Although naive lymphocytes migrate mainly through secondary lymphoid organs, effector and memory lymphocytes acquire ‘traffic’ molecules that endow them with the capacity to migrate to select extralymphoid tissues and to sites of inflammation. Of the extralymphoid compartments, the gastrointestinal mucosa and the skin are the two main body surfaces exposed to environmental antigens and are also the two paradigmatic tissues for which tissue-specific adhesion and chemoattractant receptors (also known as homing receptors) have been characterized in detail. For example, effector and memory lymphocytes migrating to the small bowel require expression of the
α4β7-integrin and CC-chemokine receptor 9 (
CCR9), whereas those migrating to the skin rely on the expression of ligands for E- and P-selectin and
CCR4 or
CCR10 (REF.
73) (). It has been demonstrated that the lymphoid microenvironment in which lymphocytes are activated determines the set of homing receptors that they acquire — for example, T cells activated in skin-draining lymph nodes acquire skin-homing receptors whereas those activated in the GALT acquire gut-homing receptors
90. In the lymphoid microenvironment, DCs are essential for efficient T-cell activation
91. Several groups have shown that DCs from Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph nodes are sufficient to induce the expression of α
4β
7-integrin and CCR9 and therefore imprint gut-homing capacity on activated mouse T cells
92–96 and mouse and human B cells
68,76, whereas lymphocytes activated by mouse DCs from peripheral lymph nodes preferentially acquire skin-homing receptors
95,96.
How do GALT-resident DCs imprint lymphocytes with a gut-homing phenotype? More than 25 years ago it was shown that rats suffering from both protein-caloric and vitamin A deficiencies exhibited impaired migration of recently activated mesenteric lymphocytes to the small intestinal mucosa
97. Protein-caloric malnutrition without vitamin A deficiency did not affect lymphocyte migration
97. Adoptive transfer experiments showed that impaired lymphocyte migration was observed only when donor lymphocytes were from protein-caloric-deficient and vitamin A-deficient rats and not when wild-type cells were transferred to protein-caloric-deficient and vitamin A-deficient recipients
97. This suggests that vitamin A deficiency mainly affected lymphocyte migratory capacity, but not the target tissues
97. More recently, it was described that vitamin A-depleted rats had a marked decrease in the number of IgA
+ ASCs and CD4
+ T cells in the ileum
83. The molecular basis for these observations was recently determined in a study that showed that mice depleted of vitamin A had decreased numbers of effector and memory T cells in the gut mucosa, but not elsewhere
15. The vitamin A metabolite retinoic acid was sufficient to induce the expression of α
4β
7-integrin and CCR9 by activated T cells, even in the absence of DCs
15. Blocking retinoic acid receptors of the RAR family significantly decreased the induction of α
4β
7-integrin expression by T cells by GALT-resident DCs, which shows that retinoic acid is essential for the gut-imprinting capacity of the DCs
15. Consistently, GALT-resident DCs, unlike DCs from other tissues, express RALDH enzymes, which are essential for retinoic acid biosynthesis
15. Together, these results indicate that retinoic acid is pivotal for the imprinting of gut-homing T cells.
Although vitamin A deficiency decreases the number of T and B cells in the small bowel lamina propria
15,76,83,97, it does not affect lymphocyte migration to the colon
97. Analogously, GALT-resident DCs imprint T and B cells with homing capacity for the small bowel, but they do not induce colon-homing T cells
93. Therefore, retinoic acid is neither necessary nor sufficient to imprint colon-homing lymphocytes. The molecular signals that are responsible for lymphocyte homing to the colon and the reasons why T-cell migration to this compartment is controlled differently from homing to the small bowel are still to be determined.
Regarding the migration of ASCs, it has been proposed that CCR10 might have a role in the homing of IgA
+ ASCs to the colon, mammary glands and probably to other mucosal compartments
73 (). However, it is currently unclear how CCR10 expression is induced by ASCs. Recent reports indicate that IgA
+ ASCs might acquire CCR10 expression in colonic patches or in iliac lymph nodes following rectal immunization
98 and that the expression of this receptor can also be induced by 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 in human ASCs
39. However, 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 does not induce CCR10 expression in murine ASCs
in vitro and VDR-deficient mice have normal numbers of CCR10
+ IgA
+ ASCs
39, which indicates that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 might not be necessary for the induction of CCR10 expression by B cells
in vivo, at least in mice.
In vitro-generated tissue-tropic lymphocytes retain marked plasticity; skin-homing T cells can be converted to gut-homing T cells and vice versa if they are re-stimulated with or without GALT-resident DCs, respectively
95,96. Similarly, previously activated B cells can be re-educated and acquire or lose gut-homing potential when they are restimulated with or without retinoic acid, respectively
76. The decrease in α
4β
7-integrin and CCR9 expression observed in T and B cells that are activated in the absence of retinoic acid might be a default differentiation mechanism. However, it is also possible that other factors can actively contribute to the downregulation of gut-homing-receptor expression by lymphocytes. As both RAR and VDR must form heterodimers with RXR to signal, it is possible that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 could actively antagonize the effects of retinoic acid by competing for the same nuclear partner
18. Consistent with this possibility, 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 blocks the retinoic acid-induced upregulation of gut-homing receptors on human T cells
6,99. However, whether this retinoic acid antagonism by 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 has a regulatory role in the imprinting of gut-homing lymphocytes
in vivo remains unknown.
In addition to imprinting a gut-homing phenotype on lymphocytes, retinoic acid and GALT-resident DCs also block the upregulation of the skin-homing receptors CCR4 and ligands for P- and E-selectin by T cells
15,95. Therefore, acquisition of a skin-homing phenotype might be the default pathway for T-cell activation in the absence of retinoic acid or when RAR signalling is blocked
100. Nonetheless, as VD
3 as well as 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 can be synthesized in the skin
101, it is conceivable that, like retinoic acid in the gut, 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 might have a reciprocal role in imprinting lymphocyte homing to the skin. In agreement with this possibility, it was recently shown that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 synergizes with IL-12 to induce the expression of skin-associated CCR10 by human T cells
6. However, it was also shown that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 actually blocks the upregulation of ligands for E-selectin
6,99 and the expression of fucosyltransferase-VII (REF.
99), an enzyme essential for the synthesis of selectin ligands
102. This was correlated with decreased homing of T cells to the inflamed skin in a model of contact hypersensitivity induced by oxazolone
99. Although these data indicate that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 might block skin-homing, it should be noted that these experiments were carried out without IL-12 supplementation, which could potentially counteract the negative effect of 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 on the expression of E-selectin ligands and skin-homing. It is also possible that 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 induces CCR10 expression by T cells after they have homed to the skin to increase their retention in this tissue. In fact, because keratinocytes express the CCR10 ligand CC-chemokine ligand 27 (CCL27), it has been proposed that CCR10 upregulation might promote T-cell trafficking to and/or retention in the epidermis
6.
Finally, 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 might also affect leukocyte migration by blocking chemokine synthesis at effector sites. For instance, 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 decreased the expression of CCL2, CCL3, CXCl10 and subsequent monocyte infiltration in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)
103. Similarly, a 1,25(OH)
2VD
3 analogue decreased the production of the chemokines CCL2, CCL5, CXCl10 and consequent T
H1-cell infiltration in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice, a model of type 1 diabetes
104.