|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The platelet-derived growth factor (Pdgf) signaling system is known to play a significant role during embryonic and postnatal development of testes in mammals and birds. In contrast, genes that comprise the Pdgf system in reptiles have never been cloned or studied in any tissue, let alone developing gonads. To explore the potential role of PDGF ligands and their receptors during embryogenesis, we cloned cDNA fragments of Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, and receptors PdgfR-α and PdgfR-β in the snapping turtle, a reptile with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD). We then compared gene expression profiles in gonads from embryos incubated at a male-producing temperature to those from embryos at a female-producing temperature, as well as between hatchling testes and ovaries. Expression of Pdgf-B mRNA in embryonic gonads was significantly higher at a male temperature than at a female temperature, but there was no difference between hatchling testes and ovaries. This developmental pattern was reversed for Pdgf-A and PdgfR-α mRNA: expression of these genes did not differ in embryos, but diverged in hatchling testes and ovaries. Levels of PdgfR-β mRNA in embryonic gonads were not affected by temperature and did not differ between testes and ovaries. However, expression of both receptors increased at least an order of magnitude from the embryonic to the post-hatching period. Finally, we characterized expression of these genes in several other embryonic tissues. The brain, heart, and liver displayed unique expression patterns that distinguished these tissues from each other and from intestine, lung, and muscle. Incubation temperature had a significant effect on expression of PdgfR-α and PdgfR-β in the heart but not other tissues. Together, these findings demonstrate that temperature has tissue specific effects on the Pdgf system and suggest that Pdgf signaling is involved in sex determination and the ensuing differentiation of testes in the snapping turtle.
The platelet-derived growth factor (Pdgf) signaling system is composed of four ligands, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-C, and PDGF-D, and two receptors, PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β. While the function of the first two lig ands and receptors is well characterized, much less is known about PDGF-C, and PDGF-D. In general, PDGF-A and PDGF-B act as paracrine signals that induce key cellular processes including proliferation, migration, and differentiation (Heldin and Westermark, 1999; Hoch and Soriano, 2003). The ligands function as homodimers (PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB) and heterodimers (PDGF-AB) that bind to and activate receptors with an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Like their ligands, the transmembrane receptors form homodimers and heterodimers, which together confer some degree of signaling specificity. To be exact, PDGF-AA only activates PDGFR-α homodimers, PDGF-AB can activate PDGFR-α homodimers or PDGFR-αβ heterodimers, while PDGF-BB activates all three receptor dimers. Moreover, the precise ligand-receptor combination has been shown to trigger slightly different intracellular signaling cascades (Heldin and Westermark, 1999).
As a consequence of these signaling differences and variation in Pdgf gene expression among tissues, knockout mice lacking individual components of the Pdgf system display distinct phenotypes (Klinghoffer et al., 2001). For example, Pdgf-B and PdgfR-β are required for normal development of the vasculature and kidneys: mice lacking functional copies of either of these genes die perinatally. Mice missing Pdgf-A die as a result of lung abnormalities, whereas PdgfR-α knockout mice have problems with myotome formation as well as craniofacial and central nervous system defects. Disruption of Pdgf signaling also has adverse effects on testis development. Studies in mammals and birds show the Pdgf system is involved in migration of cells from the mesonephros into the developing gonad, differentiation of Leydig and perimyoid cells, and vascularization of the testis (Gnessi et al., 1995; Gnessi et al., 2000; Chiarenza et al., 2000; Uzumcu et al., 2002; Brennan et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2005). Given the general importance of the Pdgf system for embryogenesis and the key role it plays during testis formation in other amniotes, we decided to characterize tissue specific patterns of expression for Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β in snapping turtle embryos and to study the influence of incubation temperature on gene expression in developing gonads.
The snapping turtle differs from birds and mammals in that it has temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) rather than genotypic sex determination (GSD). The TSD pattern in snapping turtles is female-male-female from low to high incubation temperatures (Yntema, 1976; Janzen, 1992; Rhen and Lang, 1998; Ewert et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the basic process of gonad development is similar in all amniotes, including turtles (Wibbels et al., 1991; Yao and Capel, 2005; Rhen, unpublished observations). The genital ridge initially forms as a thickening of the coelomic epithelium that overlies the mesonephros. This ridge grows and develops in an identical fashion in all embryos to form the bipotential gonad, which is composed of an inner medullary region and an outer cortex. Testes develop when the medulla grows, seminiferous tubules differentiate, and the cortex regresses. In contrast, ovaries develop when the medulla regresses and the cortex grows and differentiates. Ovarian development involves aggregation of germ cells in clusters and reorganization of germ and somatic cells into primordial follicles. In addition, several genes seem to play the same role in gonad development in all amniotes, including those species with TSD (Spotila et al. 1998; Western et al. 1999; Fleming et al. 1999; Western et al. 2000; Kettlewell et al. 2000; Valleley et al. 2001; Torres Maldonado et al. 2003; Murdock and Wibbels 2003a,b; Schmahl et al. 2003; Shoemaker et al. 2007a,b; Ramsey and Crews 2007a,b; Rhen et al. 2007; Ramsey et al. 2007; Smith et al., 2008).
A defining event occurs when the bipotential gonads commit to develop as testes or ovaries, a process referred to as sex determination. The developmental window when temperature establishes organ fate is called the temperature sensitive period (TSP) and has been defined by shifting eggs between male- and female-producing temperatures at different developmental stages and examining hatchling sex ratios. The TSP comprises 20-35% of the total embryonic period in most TSD reptiles (Mrosovsky and Pieau, 1991; Lang and Andrews, 1994; Crews, 1996), with the notable exception of the snapping turtle. In our model organism, exposure of embryos to a female-producing temperature for 5-6 days (~8% of embryogenesis) is sufficient to induce ovary development in embryos otherwise incubated at a male-producing temperature (Yntema, 1979; Rhen, unpublished observations). This relatively short TSP allows us to focus on changes in gene expression during a discrete phase of development when the fate of the bipotential gonad is established.
We recently described temperature-dependent expression patterns for nine snapping turtle genes known to play a role in sex determination in mammals (Rhen et al., 2007). Six of these genes were strongly regulated by incubation temperature during the TSP and therefore appear to play a conserved role in sex determination in the snapping turtle. Studies in birds and mammals suggest the Pdgf system may also be a conserved module in the gene regulatory network for testis formation. In the current study, we cloned cDNA fragments of Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β in the snapping turtle, compared nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences to orthologs in other vertebrates, and examined expression profiles during the TSP of gonad development. We also studied expression of these genes in several other embryonic tissues and in testes and ovaries from hatchlings. Our results suggest the Pdgf system is involved in TSD and the differentiation of testes in snapping turtles.
Snapping turtle embryos and hatchlings were treated according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of North Dakota. We collected eggs within 24 hours of laying from turtle nests along the Clearwater and Mississippi Rivers in north-central Minnesota, USA (area bounded by the following coordinates: 47°15′N to 47°45′N and 95°05′W to 95°21′W). We transported eggs to the animal quarters in the Biology Department at the University of North Dakota and held them at ~20°C for less than one week. Eggs were washed and candled to separate fertile and infertile eggs. Approximately equal numbers of eggs from each clutch were assigned to one of two temperature treatments to control for genetic variation in thermal sensitivity (Rhen and Lang, 1998; Rhen et al., 2007). Eggs were placed in containers filled with moist vermiculite and randomly positioned within foam box incubators (Rhen and Lang, 1994). Extensive details concerning incubation regime, tissue collection, RNA extraction, and the measurement of mRNA levels have already been described (Rhen et al., 2007), so we briefly summarize our procedures below.
Eggs in one treatment group were incubated at a male-producing temperature (26.5°C) throughout development. Eggs in a second treatment group were incubated at 26.5°C for most of embryogenesis, but were exposed to a female-producing temperature (31°C) for 6 days starting at stage 16. This brief exposure to 31°C is sufficient to induce ovary development in all embryos (Rhen et al., 2007). We collected gonads from embryos incubated at 26.5°C and from clutch mates incubated at 26.5°C-31°C-26.5°C on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the temperature shift. This corresponds to the period when temperature establishes the fate of the bipotential gonads (Rhen, unpublished results). Hereafter, we refer to the male-producing thermal regime as 26C and the female-producing thermal regime as 26-31-26C.
This experimental design has two advantages over incubating eggs at male- vs. female-producing temperatures throughout development. First, temperature has pervasive effects on reptiles beyond its impact on the gonads (Rhen and Lang, 2004). Thus, general temperature effects on traits like developmental rate could be confounded with specific effects involved in sex determination. By incubating embryos at the same temperature until the start of the TSP, we minimize these potentially confounding effects. Second, we can use a discrete temperature “pulse” to tease apart upstream events involved in TSD from downstream aspects of testis and ovary differentiation. For example, we see significant changes in gene expression as soon as 1-2 days after a temperature shift but there are no visible histological differences between incipient testes and ovaries until after the TSP (Rhen et al., 2007; Rhen, unpublished observations).
It is also important to point out that gonads were micro-dissected from the adrenal-kidney complex for cloning cDNA fragments and for gene expression analyses. This allows us to characterize gene expression exclusively in the gonads (Ramsey and Crews, 2007a). A subset of embryos was allowed to hatch to confirm that 26C produced males, that 26-31-26C produced females, and to compare gene expression in gonads from embryos and hatchlings. We also collected brain, heart, intestine, kidney, liver, lung, and skeletal muscle from a few embryos during the TSP to test for generalized temperature effects on Pdgf mRNA expression and tissue-specific expression patterns. All tissues were placed in RNAlater solution (Ambion, Austin TX) immediately after dissection and stored at -20°C until RNA was extracted.
Total RNA was extracted from pairs of gonads from individual embryos or hatchlings as described (Rhen et al., 2007). Total RNA was treated with DNase to eliminate trace amounts of genomic DNA. Purified total RNA was quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). Total RNA from all samples had 260/280 absorbance ratios of 1.8-2.0 in elution buffer. Total RNA from hatchlings displayed discrete 18S and 28S rRNA bands when analyzed on agarose gels. Total RNA (100 ng) from each pair of gonads was used in a 20 μl reverse transcription reaction using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit, which contains a mix of oligo dT and random hexamers (BioRad, Hercules, CA).
We designed cloning primers to hybridize highly conserved regions of Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α and PdgfR-β coding sequences. We also used nested PCR primers to increase specificity for each gene. Fresh PCR products amplified from embryonic and/or hatchling cDNA were analyzed by gel electrophoresis. PCR products were cloned using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Colonies were picked, cultured overnight in LB, and plasmids purified from 1 ml of liquid media using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Inserts were sequenced with M13 Forward and M13 Reverse primers and the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequences from multiple clones were aligned to generate consensus sequences, which were then used in nucleotide BLAST searches to retrieve orthologous sequences. Alignment of snapping turtle gene fragments with orthologs from other vertebrates was done with BioEdit software. MEGA4 software was used to produce neighbor-joining trees, which were used to infer phylogenetic relationships among snapping turtle genes and orthologs from other vertebrates. We used the online ExPASy tool (http://ca.expasy.org/tools/dna.html) for in silico translation of nucleotide sequences to examine conservation at the amino acid level.
Real time PCR was used to measure expression of Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β mRNA and 18s rRNA in pure gonads. In brief, each reaction tube contained 7.5 μl of 2X SYBER GreenER solution (Invitrogen), 200 nM of each forward and reverse primer (see Tables Tables11--44 for primer sequences), 5 μl of cDNA synthesized from gonads isolated from one individual (equivalent to 2.5 nanograms [ng] of total RNA), and water to bring the total reaction volume to 15 μl. Reactions were run on the Chromo4 Real-Time PCR System (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The thermal profile was 95°C for 10 min to activate the DNA polymerase followed by 40 cycles of two-step PCR (94°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min).
Standard curves were used to quantify mRNA expression. Real time PCR primers were used to amplify gene fragments of interest from embryonic cDNA. We gel purified PCR products and measured DNA concentration using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. Purified PCR products were then diluted to produce a series of standards. PCR products were added to reaction tubes in the following amounts: 5,000,000 attograms (ag = 10-18 gram)/tube, 500,000 ag/tube, 50,000 ag/tube, 5,000 ag/tube, 500 ag/tube, 50 ag/tube, 5 ag/tube, and 0.5 ag/tube. Standard curves produced in this manner allowed rigorous quantification of gene expression differences across 8 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, all of our samples fell within the log-linear range of the standard curve (i.e., all samples had threshold cycles above the detection limit of the assay). Standard curves were used to estimate the amount of mRNA in attograms per 2.5 ng of total RNA from a pair of gonads. More precisely, we estimate how much cDNA was synthesized from mRNA for a given gene in 2.5 ng of total RNA. This procedure was also used to measure gene expression in other tissues.
Control reactions verified that we measured cDNA synthesized from mRNA. First, there was no amplification when reverse transcriptase was not added to total RNA (no RT control). This demonstrates that input RNA was free of genomic DNA. Moreover, there was no detectable amplification of PCR products when RNA template was not added to RT reactions (no template control). This indicates that there was no contamination from exogenous RNA. Finally, there was no amplification in tubes with water added rather than template, indicating that our reagents were pure and that there was no cross contamination from any other DNA source (i.e., carryover PCR products). Finally, efficiencies of real time PCR reactions were estimated from the slope of our standard curves (efficiencies ranged from 93% to 98%: Pdgf-A = 95.0%, Pdgf-B = 97.0%, PdgfR-α = 93.1%, and PdgfR-β = 98.0%). A melting temperature analysis was added at the end of each real time PCR to verify that a single product was amplified for each gene analyzed.
We used JMP 184.108.40.206 software for all statistical analyses (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We analyzed patterns of Pdgf gene expression in embryonic gonads using three-way ANOVA: clutch, temperature treatment, sampling day, and interactions among these variables were included in the model. We used Ct values for 18S rRNA as a covariate to control for potential variation in the quality of input RNA as well as variation in the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction. We also used expression levels for each Pdgf gene as a covariate for expression of other Pdgf genes. For instance, we used expression levels for Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β as covariates for Pdgf-A expression. This was done to test the hypothesis that genes in the Pdgf system influence expression of other genes in the system via feedback loops. Given significant main effects or interactions between independent variables, we used the Dunn-Sidák method to correct for multiple comparisons among treatment groups. The nominal significance level was calculated as ’ = 1 – (1 - )1/k, where k is the number of comparisons for an experiment wise = 0.05. Simple t-tests were used to compare expression between hatchling testes and ovaries. Sample sizes for experimental groups are shown in each figure. Finally, we used discriminant function analysis to characterize tissue specific patterns of Pdgf gene expression. Discriminant analysis is conceptually related to multivariate ANOVA and is used to determine which variables distinguish two or more naturally occurring groups (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). In our case, these groups are different embryonic tissues. The canonical variable, also called a variate, is a linear combination of the original variables (mRNA levels for Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β). The canonical plot shows canonical variate for each sample and the mean for each canonical variate in the two multivariate dimensions that best separate the tissues.
We used reverse transcription and nested PCR to clone fragments of Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β cDNA from the snapping turtle (see Tables Tables11--4).4). We used BLAST to retrieve orthologous sequences from several amniotes and from frogs (or zebrafish) for sequence comparisons. All four snapping turtle genes showed greater similarity to chicken orthologs than to orthologs from other vertebrates. This relationship between turtle and bird orthologs had moderate to high bootstrap support. Snapping turtle Pdgf-A displayed 85% nucleotide identity and 95% amino acid identity with chicken Pdgf-A (Table 1). Snapping turtle Pdgf-B displayed 79% nucleotide identity and 78% amino acid identity with chicken Pdgf-B (Table 2). PdgfR-α from the snapping turtle displayed 87% nucleotide identity and 92% amino acid identity with chicken (Table 3). Snapping turtle PdgfR-β displayed 85% nucleotide identity and 91% amino acid identity with chicken PdgfR-β (Table 4).
We constructed neighbor-joining trees, which are shown in Figure 1. Putative relationships among placental mammals, marsupials, monotremes, and the turtle/bird clade were much less consistent than the relationship between turtles and birds. The platypus and opossum Pdgf-A gene grouped with turtle and chicken rather than other mammals (Figure 1A). In contrast, all mammalian Pdgf-B genes formed a single clade distinct from the turtle/bird clade (Figure 1B). Although PdgfR-α genes in mammals formed a single group, relationships among placental mammals, marsupials, and monotremes did not have strong bootstrap support (Figure 1C). Finally, the PdgfR-β gene in the turtle/bird clade grouped with placental mammals, while the platypus PdgfR-β gene was as distinct from other amniotes as the zebrafish ortholog (Figure 1D).
Temperature had no effect on Pdgf-A mRNA expression in embryonic gonads (F[1,53] = 0.21, p = 0.65; Figure 2). Pdgf-A mRNA expression varied with sampling day (F[3,53] = 3.35, p = 0.03) and the interaction between clutch and day during the TSP (F[3,53] = 2.32, p = 0.05). Expression of Pdgf-A mRNA increased significantly from day 3 to day 5 after the temperature shift (Figure 2). No other independent variables affected Pdgf-A mRNA expression during the TSP. However, there was a significant difference in Pdgf-A mRNA levels between hatchling males and females, with expression nearly three fold higher in testes than in ovaries (F[1,15] = 6.35, p = 0.02; Figure 2).
Expression of Pdgf-B mRNA was strongly influenced by incubation temperature during the TSP (F[1,53] = 21.8, p < 0.0001). Pdgf-B mRNA levels were two fold higher in gonads from embryos at 26C than in gonads from embryos at 26-31-26C on days 3, 4, and 5 of the temperature shift (Figure 3). Levels of 18S rRNA were a significant covariate (F[1,53] = 3.94, p = 0.05). No other independent variables influenced Pdgf-B mRNA abundance during the TSP. Despite the incubation temperature effect on embryonic gonads, Pdgf-B mRNA expression did not differ between hatchling testes and ovaries (F[1,16] = 0.58, p = 0.46; Figure 3).
Temperature had no influence on PdgfR-α mRNA expression in embryonic gonads (F[1,53] = 0.92, p = 0.34; Figure 4). However, PdgfR-α mRNA expression was affected by clutch (F[2,52] = 9.7, p = 0.0003) and the interaction between clutch and temperature during the TSP (F[2,52] = 3.7, p = 0.03). No other variables influenced PdgfR-α mRNA levels during the TSP. Expression of PdgfR-α mRNA diverged in male and female hatchlings, with roughly three fold higher expression in testes than ovaries (F[1,16] = 5.1, p = 0.04). Moreover, expression of PdgfR-α mRNA was ten fold higher in hatchling testes than in embryonic gonads, but only three fold higher in hatchling ovaries than in embryonic gonads (Figure 4).
Temperature had no effect on PdgfR-β mRNA expression during the TSP (F[1,53] = 0.09, p = 0.77; Figure 5). However, expression of PdgfR-β mRNA was affected by clutch (F[2,52] = 4.0, p = 0.03) and the interaction between clutch and temperature approached significance (F[2,52] = 3.0, p = 0.06). Levels of Pdgf-A mRNA were a significant covariate for PdgfR-β (F[1,51] = 5.9, p = 0.02). No other variables influenced PdgfR-β mRNA levels during the TSP. Expression of PdgfR-β mRNA did not differ between testes and ovaries at hatch (F[1,15] = 0.89, p = 0.36; Figure 5). Although there were no differences between incubation temperatures or sexes, PdgfR-β mRNA levels increased dramatically (~30 fold) from the embryonic to the post-hatching period.
Embryonic tissues were reliably classified (i.e., 83% of samples) by their Pdgf expression profiles using discriminant analysis (Pillai’s Trace = 2.03; approximate F-statistic = 3.51; df numerator = 20, df denominator = 68; p < 0.0001). A plot of the first versus second canonical variables for each sample and 95% confidence ellipses for each tissue are shown in Figure 6. The first and second canonical variables together accounted for 99.1% of the variance in gene expression among tissues (Table 5). Brain, heart, and liver samples were correctly identified in every instance by discriminant analysis. In contrast, one lung sample was misclassified as intestine and one intestine sample as lung. Two muscle samples were misclassified as intestine and lung. In summary, the heart was distinguished from all other tissues by slightly higher Pdgf-A and Pdgf-B expression and extremely low PdgfR-β expression (i.e., along the first canonical axis in Figure 6). The brain and liver also differed from each other along the first canonical axis: the brain had higher Pdgf-A and Pdgf-B and lower PdgfR-β expression than the liver (Figure 6). In addition, the brain and liver differed from all other tissues along the second canonical axis, which reflected lower PdgfR-α expression in comparison to heart, intestine, lung, and muscle (Figure 6). Although sample sizes were small, the temperature effect on PdgfR-α expression in the heart approached significance: expression was higher at 26C than 26-31-26C (student’s t test = 3.85, df = 2, p = 0.06). Temperature had a significant effect on PdgfR-β expression in the heart: expression was higher at 26C than 26-31-26C (student’s t test = 4.12, df = 2, p = 0.05). In contrast, temperature had no influence on Pdgf gene expression in any other tissue.
We report partial cDNA sequences for Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, PdgfR-α, and PdgfR-β and characterize expression of these genes for the first time in a reptile. We found tissue specific patterns of Pdgf expression in snapping turtle embryos, as well as temperature-induced variation in Pdgf expression in developing gonads. In particular, expression of Pdgf-B mRNA in embryonic gonads was higher at a male-producing temperature than at a female-producing temperature. This effect occurred when gonads commit to testicular vs. ovarian fate, which suggests that Pdgf signaling may be involved in temperature-dependent sex determination. Our findings in hatchlings further implicate Pdgf signaling in the differentiation of snapping turtle testes: expression of Pdgf-A and PdgfR-α mRNA was significantly higher in testes than in ovaries. In contrast, PdgfR-β mRNA expression did not differ between embryonic gonads at different temperatures or between hatchling testes and ovaries.
These results, in conjunction with studies in birds and mammals, suggest the Pdgf system plays a conserved, but complex, role in testis development in amniotes. For example, mouse PdgfR-α have pleiotropic defects, including disruption of male-typical embryos lacking vasculature, fewer testis cords, and drastically reduced numbers of Leydig cells (Brennan et al., 2003). Nevertheless, embryonic mice lacking Pdgf-A develop normal testes with fetal Leydig cells that secrete testosterone (Gnessi et al., 2000). Hence, another ligand besides PDGF-A must signal via PDGFR-α during early testis development. A conserved sex difference in Pdgf-B expression in embryonic gonads in mice (Puglianiello et al., 2004) and in snapping turtles (this study) points to PDGF-B as a likely candidate for activation of PDGFR-α. Indeed, addition of PDGF-B to serum free media induces formation of cords in embryonic mouse testes grown in culture (Ricci et al., 2004). The latter study also found that PDGF-B induces migration of mesonephric cells and proliferation of somatic cells within the nascent testis. Mesonephric precursors give rise to endothelial and interstitial cells, but not to myoid cells, in the mammalian testis (Wilhelm et al., 2007; Cool et al., 2008). While sex-specific movement of cells from the mesonephros into the gonad is conserved in mammals and birds, mesonephric cells do not appear to migrate into embryonic gonads in turtles (Yao et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2005; Yao and Capel, 2005). However, studies in turtles are not yet definitive with regard to this question.
Research in knockout mice indicates a developmental transition from PDGF-B signaling in embryos to PDGF-A signaling after birth. Although Pdgf-A is not needed for the initial formation or function of testes in embryos, adult Leydig cells fail to develop in Pdgf-A deficient mice (Gnessi et al., 2000). In wild-type mice, fetal Leydig cells regress after birth and are functionally replaced by a new cohort of Leydig cells that differentiate from distinct precursors at puberty. Failure to induce proliferation and differentiation of adult Leydig cell precursors results in reduced testis size and androgen titers. In short, PDGF-B signaling is sufficient for development of fetal Leydig cells, whereas differentiation of adult Leydig cells requires PDGF-A signaling. Our findings in the snapping turtle suggest a similar ontogenetic shift in signaling between embryonic and post-embryonic testes. While Pdgf-B expression was higher in embryonic gonads at a male-producing temperature, there was no difference in Pdgf-B expression between hatchling testes and ovaries. In contrast, expression of Pdgf-A and PdgfR-α did not differ in embryonic gonads at male- vs. female-producing temperatures, but was higher in hatchling testes than ovaries. While these results are suggestive, experimental manipulations will be required to test the hypothesis that Pdgf-B plays a key role in fetal Leydig cell development and that Pdgf-A is required for adult Leydig cell differentiation in the snapping turtle. Expression patterns for Pdgf-A and PdgfR-α in snapping turtle embryos were different than those reported in mouse and chicken embryos, where expression was higher in testes than in ovaries (Brennan et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2005). It is currently unclear whether this species difference has any functional consequences.
Another important question is whether the Pdgf system is involved in the development of other organs in turtle embryos. We observed tissue-specific expression patterns, which imply unique roles for different components of the Pdgf system in different tissues (Heldin and Westermark, 1999; Klinghoffer et al., 2001; Hoch and Soriano, 2003). The heart, for instance, differed from all other tissues examined in that expression of Pdgf-A and Pdgf-B was slightly higher than average whereas PdgfR-β expression was extremely low. The latter result is consistent with reports that PdgfR-β expression is faint in cardiac muscle later in mouse development (Betsholtz et al., 2001). Nevertheless, these observations are surprising because PdgfR-β knockout mice have dilated hearts, hypotrophic cardiac muscle, and defects in the ventricular septum (Betsholtz et al., 2001). This discrepancy may be biologically irrelevant if low levels of PDGFR-β are sufficient for normal cardiovascular development or if PDGFR-β expression is higher at earlier developmental stages (i.e., when precursors commit to develop as cardiac muscle). In any event, the heart was the only tissue (besides the gonads) in which temperature influenced gene expression. Expression of PdgfR-α and PdgfR-β was higher in hearts from embryos incubating at a male temperature vs. a female temperature. The functional significance of these differences is not clear, but they are associated with variation in physiology: heart rate is much lower in embryos at the male-producing temperature than in embryos at a female-producing temperature (Dane Crossley, personal communication).
Expression patterns in the liver were the opposite of expression patterns in the heart. While the liver had average PdgfR-β expression, it had the lowest Pdgf-A, Pdgf-B, and PdgfR-α expression of any tissue we studied. Information on Pdgf signaling in the liver is limited to studies showing that Pdgf-B can stimulate migration and proliferation of hepatic fibroblasts in vitro and that over expression of Pdgf-B in the liver of mice causes fibrosis (Tangkijvanich et al., 2002; Czochra et al., 2006). The brain also displayed a unique expression pattern with slightly higher Pdgf-A and Pdgf-B and lower PdgfR-β expression than the liver. Expression of PdgfR-α in the brain was also relatively low. In contrast, PdgfR-α expression was highest in intestine, lung, and muscle of snapping turtle embryos. These results are consistent with the function of Pdgf-A and PdgfR-α in formation of intestinal villi and lung alveoli and PdgfR-α in myotomes in mice (Betsholtz, 2004). In summary, our expression data suggest the Pdgf signaling system plays a conserved role in the developing testis as well as in the development of several other organs in the snapping turtle.
Finally, the Pdgf sequences we obtained have some bearing on phylogenetic relationships among amniotes. Neighbor joining trees for all four genes place turtles as a sister group to birds, rather than in a more basal position as sister group to birds and mammals. This result is consistent with recent analyses based on morphology and molecular sequences in extant species as well as the fossil record (Meyer and Zardoya, 2003). Unfortunately, Pdgf sequences are not yet available from any other reptile, which would allow us to infer evolutionary relationships among turtles, birds, and various diapsids (i.e., crocodilians, lizards, snakes, and the tuatara). Given the apparent conservation of function for the Pdgf signaling system across great evolutionary distances, sequence data from Pdgf orthologs in other reptiles could help resolve controversy surrounding the placement of turtles within the amniote tree (Meyer and Zardoya, 2003).
This work was supported by Grant #5R21HD049486 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to T. Rhen.
Grant sponsor: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Grant number: 1 R21 HD049486
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.