PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Mol Cancer Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2906253
NIHMSID: NIHMS204377

Effects of Thymoquinone in the Expression of Mucin 4 in Pancreatic Cancer Cells: Implications for the Development of Novel Cancer Therapies

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in the world, as it continues to be resistant to any therapeutic approaches. The high molecular weight glycoprotein mucin 4 (MUC4) is aberrantly expressed in pancreatic cancer and contributes to the regulation of differentiation, proliferation, metastasis, and the chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer cells. The absence of its expression in the normal pancreatic ductal cells makes MUC4 a promising target for novel cancer therapeutics. Natural products have been widely investigated as potential candidates in cancer therapies, and thymoquinone (TQ), extracted from the seeds of Nigella sativa, has shown excellent antineoplastic properties in some systems. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of TQ on pancreatic cancer cells and specifically investigated its effect on MUC4 expression. The MUC4-expressing pancreatic cancer cells FG/COLO357 and CD18/HPAF were incubated with TQ, and in vitro functional assays were done. The results obtained indicate that treatment with TQ downregulated MUC4 expression through the proteasomal pathway and induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by the activation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. In agreement with previous studies, the decrease in MUC4 expression correlated with an increase in apoptosis, decreased motility, and decreased migration of pancreatic cancer cells. MUC4 transient silencing studies showed that c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways are activated in pancreatic cancer cells, indicating that the activation of these pathways by TQ is directly related to the MUC4 downregulation induced by the drug. Overall, TQ has potential for the development of novel therapies against pancreatic cancer.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is a major problem worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Treatment against this malignancy remains a major challenge in oncology as evidenced by the unchanged overall survival (<5%) of pancreatic cancer patients over the last 25 years (1, 2). Currently, chemotherapy is the only treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, and unfortunately, there are numerous molecular factors involved in the chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer tumors (3). Therefore, novel therapies are desperately needed and alternative markers must be evaluated for their potential in improving the prognosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer patients.

Mucins are a family of large, heavily glycosylated proteins that are expressed in various epithelial tissues. Although there is no specific tumor marker for diagnosing pancreatic cancer, mucins have been researched as potential diagnostic candidates (4). It has been long suspected that alterations in mucin expression as well as the expression of aberrant forms of mucins contribute to the development of cancer by influencing growth, differentiation, and immune surveillance (5). In particular, mucin 4 (MUC4), a membrane-bound mucin, which consists of a mucin-type subunit (MUC4α) and a transmembrane growth factor–like subunit (MUC4β), contributes to the regulation of differentiation, proliferation, and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells (6, 7). It has been reported that MUC4 is aberrantly expressed in precancerous pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions, and its expression increases with the progression of the disease (8). As it is not expressed in normal pancreatic ductal cells, MUC4 is a promising target for novel anticancer therapies (9). In addition to being a good candidate for targeted therapies against several tumors, we and others have shown that MUC4 is also responsible for the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic drugs (i.e., gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and cisplatin; refs. 1012). Therefore, a logical approach for pancreatic cancer treatment would be to target MUC4 expression in pancreatic cancer cells to overcome their intrinsic resistance to apoptosis.

Among the novel anticancer drugs that are being currently studied, natural products have emerged as promising candidates that have gained considerable attention (13). It has been well documented that the seed extracts of the plant Nigella sativa (black seed), widely used for natural remedies in the Middle East, possess multiple benefits, including antitumorigenic effects (14, 15). One of the extracted compounds that has shown promising antineoplastic properties is thymoquinone (TQ). An important characteristic of TQ is that it induces cytotoxicity and apoptosis of cancer cells, whereas nonneoplastic cells are relatively resistant to the drug (1619). A comprehensive review of the multiple benefits of TQ provides evidence that, although no clinical studies testing TQ have been established yet, its anticancer properties are well supported on numerous in vitro and in vivo studies (14). Of particular importance is the finding that TQ was shown to be 4- to 5-fold more cytotoxic to cisplatin-resistant osteosarcoma cells (18) and equally sensitive in multidrug-resistant variants of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, uterine sarcoma, and leukemic cell lines (20) when compared with their respective parental controls. Additionally, a particular benefit of TQ is its relative nontoxicity, as it has been reported that the LD50 of TQ in mice and rats is more than 10 and 100 times the effective doses reported for intraperitoneal and oral ingestion, respectively (21).

Although few studies have evaluated the potential of TQ in pancreatic cancer therapy, some of the studies done in pancreatic cancer cells have shown that TQ possesses anti-inflammatory properties (22), reduces proliferation (23, 24), and sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (25). In the present study, we investigated the effect of TQ in MUC4-expressing pancreatic cancer cells. The pancreatic cancer cell lines FG/COLO357 and CD18/HPAF were incubated with TQ, and functional assays and mechanistic studies were done. The results indicate that TQ induced the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells, and specifically, the downregulation of MUC4 expression played a critical role in this process.

Materials and Methods

Drug

TQ (MP Biomedicals) was dissolved in acetone (100 mmol/L) and stored at 4°C protected from light. Subsequent dilutions were prepared in DMEM supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) without antibiotics immediately before adding to cell culture.

Cell culture

The metastatic FG/COLO357 and CD18/HPAF cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 μg/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). The cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. All the experiments were done on FG/COLO357 cells, whereas data in the CD18/HPAF cell line are included in Supplementary Data.

Antibodies

The MUC4 monoclonal antibody (8G7) used in these studies was developed by our group (26). The antibodies phospho–stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK; Thr183/Tyr185), total JNK, cleaved caspase-9 (Asp330), and caspase-3 were purchased from Cell Signaling. The antibodies Bcl-xL (H-5), Bax, phospho–signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1; Ser727), total STAT1, phospho–focal adhesion kinase (FAK; Tyr925), total FAK, total p38, and HER2 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The phospho-Crk/p38 (pY221) antibody was purchased from Epitomics, and β-actin antibody was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The secondary antibodies used were the enhanced chemiluminescence anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (GE Healthcare). The secondary antibody FITC-conjugated anti-mouse was obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch Labs, Inc.

Cytotoxicity assay

To determine the cytotoxicity of TQ on pancreatic cancer cells, 0.25 × 105 cells were seeded per well on a 96-well plate in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. After overnight incubation, TQ was added at different concentrations (10–100 μmol/L). After 24 hours, the media were replaced with media containing Alamar Blue reagent (Invitrogen), and the fluorescence (λexcitation = 570 nm, λemission = 585 nm) was measured after 4 hours of incubation. Quadruplicate wells were used for each concentration of TQ, and the cytotoxicity was calculated by substituting the corresponding mean fluorescence values in the following equation:

%Cytotoxicity=(Untreated cells)(TQtreated cells)(Untreated cells)×100

where untreated cells refer to cells that are suspended in media alone (0 μmol/LTQ). The experiment was repeated thrice.

Western blot analysis

For protein analysis, 1 × 106 of pancreatic cancer cells were seeded on each well of a six-well plate in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. After overnight incubation, fresh solutions of TQ (50 and 100 μmol/L) were prepared and added to the respective wells. Cells incubated with the corresponding amount of acetone present in the highest concentrated solution of TQ were used as a negative control (0 μmol/L). After 24 hours of incubation with the drug, protein lysates were isolated with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Samples were stored at −80°C. After several freeze-thaw cycles, the lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The concentration of the proteins was determined with the micro–bicinchoninic acid protein estimation kit (Bio-Rad). Protein concentrations were adjusted, and corresponding solutions were prepared under reducing conditions with β-mercaptoethanol. To resolve the MUC4 protein, 20 μg of protein lysates were loaded in 2% SDS agarose gels and run for 6 hours at 100 V. For all the other functional proteins, 30 to 60 μg of protein lysates were loaded in 10% SDS-PAGE gels and run at 80 mA for 1 hour. Resolved proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked in 5% fat-free dry milk in PBS, and incubated with the primary antibodies overnight. After washing four times with PBST (PBS and 0.1% Tween), the corresponding secondary antibodies were added. After washing the secondary antibodies with PBST, the proteins were detected by luminol detection reagents (Thermo Scientific) after exposure to X-ray films. The experiment for analyzing all the functional proteins after TQ treatment was repeated a minimum of three times.

Confocal microscopy

For confocal analysis, 0.5 × 106 FG/COLO357 cells were seeded on sterilized round glass coverslips, which were placed on separate wells of a 12-well plate, and incubated overnight. After cells were attached to the coverslips, TQ (50 and 100 μmol/L) was added and cells were incubated for 24 hours. For MUC4 staining, cells were washed with HBSS and fixed with cold methanol at −20°C for 2 minutes. After washing with PBS, cells were blocked with 10% goat serum (Jackson Immunoresearch Labs) in PBST for 30 minutes. Without washing, cells were incubated with anti-MUC4 monoclonal antibody (1:100) for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then washed with PBST (thrice for 5 min) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse antibody was added for 30 minutes. After repeating the washing steps, the glass coverslips were mounted on cover slides with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories).

Fluorescent phallotoxins (Invitrogen) were used for staining actin filaments. The instructions of the manufacturer were followed for formaldehyde-fixed cells. After staining was done, glass coverslips were mounted with Vectashield medium. The laser confocal microscope LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss GmbH) was used to image the cells in the respective channels at a magnification of ×63.

Measurement of MUC4 mRNA levels

The transcripts levels of MUC4 in pancreatic cancer cells after treatment with TQ were determined qualitatively by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitatively by real-time PCR. As was done for protein lysate isolation, 1 × 106 cells were seeded on each well of a six-well plate in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. After overnight incubation, fresh solutions of TQ (50 μmol/L) were prepared and cells were incubated for 24 hours. RNA was isolated and purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). The cDNA was synthesized using 2 μg RNA, oligo(dT)18 primer, and SuperScript II RNase reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). For RT-PCR, amplification was done for 30 cycles at an annealing temperature of 58°C. For MUC4 amplification, the primers used were 5′-CGCGGTGGTGGAGGCGTTCTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAAGAATCCTGACAGCCTTCA-3′ (reverse). β-Actin was used as the housekeeping gene. RT-PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Photographs were taken under UV light. The experiment was repeated at least twice.

For real-time PCR, 1 μL of cDNA was amplified using the LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics). The instrument used for real-time PCR was the LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics), and the amplification was done in a two-step cyclic process (95°C for 5 min followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 10 s). Absolute quantification was based on a calibration curve of MUC4 and β-actin. The sequences of the MUC4-specific primers used were 5′-GTGACCATGGAGGCCAGTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCATGCTCAGGTGTCCACAG-3′ (reverse). The levels of MUC4 mRNA were normalized to β-actin mRNA levels. The results are represented as the fold difference of triplicate wells in the MUC4 mRNA level in treated (50 μmol/L TQ) versus untreated (0 μmol/L TQ) cells. The experiment was repeated at least thrice.

Inhibition of proteasomal and global transcription pathways

To determine if MUC4 was downregulated at the transcriptional or translational level, 1 × 106 pancreatic cancer cells were seeded overnight on each well (six-well plate) in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. The next day, 2 hours before adding TQ solutions, the proteasomal inhibitor (PrI) MG132 (330 nmol/L; Assay Designs, Inc.) or the global gene transcription inhibitor (GGTI) garcinol (2 μmol/L; Enzo Life Sciences) was added to the respective wells. Both inhibitors were tested separately. After 2 hours, the media were replaced with fresh media containing the inhibitor and the respective concentration of TQ. The following day, the protein lysates were isolated and MUC4 expression was analyzed. Experimental samples included cells with no inhibitor, inhibitor only, TQ only, and TQ and inhibitor. The experiment was repeated twice.

Wound-healing assay

For wound-healing assays, 3 × 106 of pancreatic cancer cells were seeded in 60-mm Petri dishes in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. After overnight incubation and obtaining confluent (>90%) cultures, a wound was induced with a sterile pipette tip. Images magnified ×4 were obtained before TQ was added. Subsequently, the corresponding concentration of TQ was added (0, 50, and 100 μmol/L). Images of wound areas were obtained after 24 hours, and the motility of the cells was compared among different treatments.

Motility assay

To determine the migration of pancreatic cancer cells as a consequence of TQ treatment, a Transwell assay was done. FG/COLO357 cells (2 × 106) were suspended in 1% FBS DMEM and seeded for 24 hours in polyethylene terephthalate (PET; Becton Dickinson) membranes (pore size, 8 μm; six-well insert) with the respective concentration of TQ (0–100 μmol/L). DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the bottom of each well of the six-well plate below the PET membrane. After 24 hours of incubation, cells in the top were removed and the cells that migrated through the membrane were stained with Diff-Quick cell staining kit (Dade Behring, Inc.). The number of cells that migrated was quantified in 10 different random fields at the same magnification (×10). The results are represented as the average number of cells in one field. The experiment was repeated thrice.

Detection and quantification of apoptosis and necrosis

The Annexin V-FLUOS staining kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used to determine the number of cells undergoing apoptosis and necrosis after being incubated with 50 μmol/L TQ. Cells (1 × 106) were seeded per well (six-well plate) in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS and no antibiotics. After overnight incubation, TQ was added on triplicate wells and cells were incubated for 4 and 24 hours. Instructions of the manufacturer were followed for staining cells for flow cytometry and confocal analysis. Cells that were propidium iodide (PI) negative and Annexin V negative were considered healthy, cells that were PI negative and Annexin V positive were considered apoptotic, and cells that were positive to both PI and Annexin V were considered necrotic. Experiment was repeated thrice.

Microarray analysis

Human oligonucleotide array containing probes for 30,000 genes was constructed at the Microarray Core Facility of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Total RNA was isolated from TQ-treated (50 μmol/L) and untreated (0 μmol/L) pancreatic cancer cells by RNeasy Mini kit. Spotted microarrays were used to determine differential gene expression between these two groups. The samples were competitively hybridized to three arrays. To generate the fluorescently labeled single-stranded cDNA target, total RNA (750 ng) was reverse transcribed to generate cDNA, followed by in vitro transcription to generate aminoallyl RNA using the Amino Allyl Message Amp kit (Ambion). RNA (5 μg) was coupled with either CY5 or CY3 dye as per the manufacturer's suggestion, mixed, and cohybridized (in 20 μL of Ambion hybridization buffer) to microarray slides for 16 hours at 42°C. The slides were washed per the manufacturer's suggestions and scanned using an Axon 4000b scanner to generate .tiff images. The images were extracted using GenePix software, and resultant GPR files were used for downstream analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified using BRB Array Tools. Several filters and normalization were applied before analysis. Spots were excluded if both the red and the green channels had values <100, and if only one of the red or green channels was <100, then it was increased to the threshold of 100. Median background was subtracted and log2 transformation was applied to all ratios. Normalization was then done to “center” each array using lowess smoother, and genes were excluded if any of the spots were missing or filtered out for any of the samples. Random-variance paired t tests were used to determine which genes are differentially expressed between TQ-treated and untreated FG/COLO357 samples, comparing the log red (TQ-treated FG/COLO357; 50 μmol/L) and green (control FG/COLO357; 0 μmol/L) channel intensities. The random-variance paired t test allows sharing information among genes about variation without assuming that all genes have the same variance, which gives a more accurate estimate of the variability when sample sizes are small. A significance level of 0.001 was selected to help limit the false discovery rate due to multiple comparisons.

Transient knockdown of MUC4

To transiently knock down MUC4 on FG/COLO357 cells, 0.5 × 106 cells were seeded on each well of a six-well plate in complete media. The next day, cells were serum starved for 2 hours. The transfection reagent Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) was used. The instructions of the manufacturer were followed, and MUC4 RNAi and scramble RNAi oligonucleotides (500 pmol; Dharmacon) were added to the respective wells. The MUC4-specific sequence for the RNAi oligonucleotides used was 5′-CAGCGACACUA-GAGGGACA-3′. After 4 hours of adding the transfection solution, 0.5 mL of complete media was added to the cells. The next day, the media were replaced with fresh media and protein lysates were isolated after 24, 48, and 96 hours. The protein lysates were used for Western blot analysis. The experiment was repeated thrice. The samples from the time point where MUC4 was downregulated more significantly were used for further protein analyses (i.e., 48 h).

Results

Effect of TQ on cytotoxicity and MUC4 expression on pancreatic cancer cells

The highly metastatic pancreatic cancer cell line FG/COLO357 was incubated for 24 hours with different doses of TQ. TQ induced the cytotoxicity of FG/COLO357 cells in a dose-dependent (0–100 μmol/L) manner (Fig. 1A). The IC50 of TQ on FG/COLO357 was of 73 μmol/L after 24 hours of treatment. Further, to assess the effect of TQ on MUC4 expression, the protein lysates were analyzed by Western blot and confocal analyses. It was found that TQ downregulated the expression of MUC4 in FG/COLO357 in dose- and time-dependent manners (Fig. 1B and C). Based on these experiments, the dose and time chosen for subsequent analysis were 50 μmol/L TQ and 24 hours. Similar results were obtained in the pancreatic cancer cell line CD18/HPAF (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 1
Effect of TQ in cell viability and MUC4 expression on FG/COLO357 cells. A, cytotoxicity of TQ in FG/COLO357 cells after being incubated with the drug for 24 h. Points, mean of quadruplicate values; bars, SE. B, Western blot analysis of MUC4 expression ...

TQ downregulates MUC4 expression in pancreatic cancer cells posttranscriptionally

As the expression of MUC4 is regulated by a complex interplay of several signaling pathways, the downregulation of MUC4 expression may require simultaneous targeting of multiple signaling mechanisms. To determine the pathway of MUC4 downregulation of TQ-treated pancreatic cancer cells, the levels of MUC4 transcripts were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by RT-PCR and real-time PCR, respectively (Fig. 2A and B). The levels of MUC4 mRNA transcripts on FG/COLO357 after being incubated with TQ did not varied in untreated (0 μmol/L TQ) and TQ-treated (50 μmol/L) cells. These results suggest that TQ decreased MUC4 expression on FG/COLO357 cells posttranscriptionally. Thus, subsequently, the expression of MUC4 was analyzed on cells that were preincubated with a PrI and a GGTI before adding TQ (Fig. 2C and D). The PrI MG132 blocked the effect of TQ on MUC4 downregulation, indicating that MUC4 is targeted to the proteasomal degradation pathway in the presence of TQ (Fig. 2C). To corroborate that MUC4 was indeed not regulated transcriptionally, FG/COLO357 cells were incubated with the GGTI garcinol before adding TQ (Fig. 2D). Garcinol pretreatment had no effect on MUC4 downregulation in FG/COLO357 cells by TQ, supporting PCR data where MUC4 transcript levels did not changed significantly in the presence of TQ.

Figure 2
Downregulation of MUC4 expression on FG/COLO357 cells by TQ. A, measurement of MUC4 transcripts of cells incubated with TQ by RT-PCR. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used as a control. B, quantification of MUC4 transcripts of cells incubated ...

It has been reported that the upregulation of STAT1, rather than its phosphorylation state, plays a crucial role in MUC4 induction (27). Accordingly, the effect of TQ on the expression of STAT1 in FG/COLO357 cells was evaluated (Fig. 2E). After treatment with TQ, the phosphorylation state at Ser727 of STAT1 was decreased, whereas the total STAT1 level remained unchanged. Thus, as the levels of total STAT1 protein in the pancreatic cancer cells remained constant, it is expected that the amount of MUC4 transcripts will remain constant after treatment with TQ, supporting the results obtained with RT-PCR and real-time PCR experiments. In agreement with these results, studies done in the pancreatic cancer cell line CD18/HPAF corroborate that TQ downregulates MUC4 posttranscriptionally by the proteasomal degradation pathway (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Motility of pancreatic cancer cells decreases after treatment with TQ

The migration of epithelial cells is an important step of cancer metastasis. To evaluate TQ as a potential drug in cancer therapy, its effect on the motility and invasiveness of cancer cells needs to be evaluated. The motility of pancreatic cancer cells was analyzed by wound-healing (qualitative) and Transwell assays (quantitative), and the results showed that TQ inhibited the migration of FG/COLO357 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A and B). The wound-healing assay clearly shows that cells in the untreated group (0 μmol/L TQ) migrated across the wound much faster than cells incubated with TQ (Fig. 3A). Similarly, the Transwell assay results indicated that the number of migrating cells decreased significantly (P < 0.005) in the presence of TQ (Fig. 3B). A decreased motility of CD18/HPAF cells in the presence of TQ was also confirmed (Supplementary Fig. S3A).

Figure 3
Effect of TQ on the motility and migration of FG/COLO357 cells. A, optical microscopy images (×4) of the wound-healing assay of FG/COLO357 cells after being incubated with different doses of TQ for 24 h. Dashed yellow lines indicate the migration ...

TQ induces rearrangement of the cytoskeleton of pancreatic cancer cells

As the motility of cells is associated with the arrangement of the cortical actin network in cancer progression (28, 29), the actin filaments on TQ-treated cells in comparison with untreated cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy after phalloidin staining. It was found that TQ-treated cells had reduced cellular projections when compared with untreated cells, suggesting that FG/COLO357 cells have a decreased motility after being incubated with TQ (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4
Effect of TQ on the cytoskeleton of FG/COLO357. A, confocal microscopy images of FG/COLO357 cells after being incubated with different concentrations of TQ. Actin filaments in the cells were visualized after staining with fluorescent phallotoxins. The ...

It has been reported that MUC4 colocalizes with and stabilizes the protein HER2/ErbB2 on the cell surface (30). Specifically, HER2 expression has been linked to various types of cancer and related with tumor metastasis (3032). Not surprisingly, after incubating FG/COLO357 cells with TQ, the expression of HER2 was also decreased (Fig. 4B). These results correlated with the decrease in the phosphorylation state of FAK, which is involved in the downstream signaling of HER2 (33), after incubation with TQ (Fig. 4C). Given that FAK controls cell migration and anchorage-dependent differentiation, and is overexpressed in invasive and metastatic tumors (34), its decrease in pancreatic cancer cells after treatment with TQ indicates that the drug has potential in reducing tumor metastasis. Results were validated in the pancreatic cancer cell line CD18/HPAF (Supplementary Fig. S3B and C).

TQ induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells

Resistance to apoptosis is one of the mechanisms responsible for the survival of cancer cells. To determine if pancreatic cancer cells underwent apoptosis or necrosis as a consequence of TQ treatment, these were stained with Annexin V and PI (Fig. 5A and B). The flow cytometry results showed that after 24 hours of incubation of FG/COLO357 cells with 50 μmol/L TQ, the number of apoptotic (47%) and necrotic cells (42%) was balanced, suggesting that TQ may induce cell death by means of different pathways (Fig. 5A). The results obtained with flow cytometry were corroborated by confocal microscopy (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
Effect of TQ (50 μmol/L) in the apoptosis and necrosis of FG/COLO357 cells. A, flow cytometry results after staining cells with Annexin V and PI. Triplicate samples were analyzed after 4 and 24 h of incubation, and these were classified as healthy ...

Genes involved in tumor growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells were downregulated

The genes that were differentially regulated in FG/COLO357 cells following treatment with TQ were determined by microarray analysis (Supplementary Table S1). In general, genes involved in promoting the tumorigenic and metastatic properties of pancreatic cancer cells were downregulated in the TQ-treated cells (50 μmol/L) when compared with untreated cells (0 μmol/L). Some of the genes that were downregulated included TRIM24, S100A4, MMP7, RORA, and MMP13. The level of these genes was downregulated >65% of the original value. On the other hand, the expression of genes involved in inducing apoptosis and growth restriction was increased >4-fold in pancreatic cancer cells incubated with TQ. Several genes that were upregulated in pancreatic cancer cells after TQ treatment were STC2, IL24, TRIB3, ERRFl1, GADD45A, CYP27B1, and RND3. The function of some of the genes (i.e., TRIB3 and GADD45A) after TQ treatment involves the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, including JNK and p38 MAPK. The results from the analysis support the functional assays already discussed in this work and led us to analyze the involvement of JNK and MAPK p38 pathways.

TQ downregulates MUC4 through JNK and p38 MAPK pathways

Cancer cells can destabilize JNK and p38 MAPK pathways to facilitate the proliferation, survival, and invasion of tumor cells (35). Functional proteins were analyzed in pancreatic cancer cells after treatment with TQ, and both JNK and p38 MAPK pathways were activated (Fig. 6A), supporting the results from microarray analysis. We also found a downregulation of the cell death suppressor Bcl-xL, and an activation of the apoptotic death accelerator Bax and caspase-9, indicating that TQ activates proapoptotic pathways in FG/COLO357 cells. The levels of caspase-3, however, did not change after treatment with TQ, which implies that apoptosis could be caspase-9 dependent and caspase-3 independent, as has been published elsewhere (36).

Figure 6
Correlation of MUC4 downregulation and the induction of apoptosis in TQ-treated FG/COLO357 cells. A, Western blot analysis of functional proteins in downstream signaling pathways in cells incubated with TQ. Protein lysates (40–60 μg) were ...

To evaluate the direct association of the apoptotic effects of TQ with MUC4 in pancreatic cancer cells, transient silencing of MUC4 was done on FG/COLO357 cells. The simply transient downregulation of MUC4 on the pancreatic cancer cells was enough to activate the same apoptotic pathways (i.e., JNK and p38 MAPK) that were activated (Fig. 6B). However, the expression of Bax was decreased and the levels of Bcl-xL remained constant in the siMUC4 cells compared with cells transfected with scramble RNA.

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer treatment remains a major challenge in oncology as evidenced by the unchanged overall survival over the last 25 years (2). Numerous encouraging approaches have been developed in targeted therapies against pancreatic cancer, but results in clinical trials are not ideal and the overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients remains the same. Currently, chemotherapy is the only treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, and unfortunately, there are numerous molecular factors involved in the chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer tumors (3). Gemcitabine has been the standard chemotherapeutic drug for >10 years and, among all the therapies evaluated, the only therapeutic regimen that improved the overall survival of patients when compared with gemcitabine alone, combined the drug with erlotinib, which targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (37). One of the possible reasons for the resistance to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer are the alterations in apoptotic signaling pathways (38), which have been directly implicated in gemcitabine resistance (3). Despite all the research that has been done, there are many questions that have not been answered and no major improvement has been documented yet. It is known that novel therapies are desperately needed and alternative markers must be evaluated for their potential in improving the prognosis and therapy for pancreatic cancer patients.

The results of our present study indicate that TQ downregulates MUC4 expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Consequently, TQ reduced the motility of pancreatic cancer cells, as indicated by the reduced migration, minimized cellular projections, decreased HER2 expression, and FAK downregulation. These results agree with previous work done by our group, where it was documented that the overexpression of MUC4 is related to an increased invasiveness, migration, and motility of malignant cells (68, 30, 39).

TQ induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells by means of different pathways (Fig. 6C), and the downregulation of MUC4 was directly related to the apoptotic effect of the drug through the activation of JNK and p38 MAPK pathways. The activation of JNK and p38 MAPK pathways is not unexpected as these share upstream regulators, indicating that the activation of both pathways can be activated simultaneously, leading to the activation of a putative tumor suppressor in human cancers (35).

TQ downregulated the expression of MUC4 on pancreatic cancer cells by targeting the protein to the proteasomal degradation pathway. Interestingly, it has been recently published that the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) represses MUC4 expression by proteasomal pathway (40). Similarly, other reports indicate that MUC4 expression is inhibited posttranscriptionally by the TGF-β pathway as well (41, 42). As TGF-β induces the activation of JNK and p38 MAPK pathways (43), one possibility is that TQ induces pancreatic cancer cells to secrete TGF-β, which in turn activates the TGF-β pathway, downregulates MUC4, and, consequently, induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells (Fig. 6C). Future studies will aim to determine the role of the TGF-β signaling pathway in TQ-mediated cell signaling.

A second upstream mechanism of TQ-induced pancreatic cancer cytotoxicity is through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). It has been reported that TQ induces apoptosis by the generation of ROS and activating the JNK and extracellular signal-regulated kinase, but not p38 MAPK, pathways in colon cancer cells (19). Similarly, other natural-derived products (i.e., capsaicin) effective against pancreatic cancer cells are also known to induce apoptosis by upregulating ROS production followed by activation of the JNK pathway (44). It is possible that TQ also stimulates the generation of ROS in FG/COLO357 cells, which subsequently activates the JNK pathway and induces apoptosis (Fig. 6C). Nevertheless, further studies need to be done to establish if there is any correlation of ROS generation and MUC4 expression.

A third proposed mechanism of TQ-induced pancreatic cancer cell cytotoxicity is the Fas-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 6C), as other reports had shown that Fas-mediated apoptosis in the pancreatic cancer cell line COLO357 correlated with the activation of JNK and p38 MAPK pathways (45). As evidenced by the results shown in this work, downregulation of MUC4 and apoptosis induced by TQ are not isolated events and TQ is inducing cytotoxicity by a complex interplay between different signaling pathways, where MUC4 plays a major role.

It is important to mention that different cancer cell lines can respond differently to chemotherapeutic drugs. For example, some studies have shown that gemcitabine induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by activation of p38 MAPK and not the JNK pathway (46), whereas the activation of both pathways was directly related to apoptosis induced by TQ in the studies presented here. Furthermore, a recent published work supports the fact that different cancer cell lines can use various antiapoptotic properties of MUC4 to acquire therapeutic drug resistance (12). Although different cancer cells use different mechanisms for drug metabolism that can lead to cancer cell killing, the fact that MUC4 is involved in conferring aggressive and chemoresistant properties to malignant pancreatic tumors (8), a common denominator in pancreatic cancer therapies must be to target and downregulate this mucin to have a successful therapy.

Finally, an important aspect that need to be clarified is that, although relatively high doses of TQ were used on these experiments, it is well known that TQ is a relatively nontoxic compound as has been shown previously on in vivo experiments, where the LD50 of TQ in mice and rats is much higher than the effective doses of the drug (21). Taking into consideration these results, the concentrations used in the current study were <10% of the LD50 reported.

No study has been published yet that evaluates the effect of TQ in the expression of any mucin. Follow-up studies include the analysis of TQ in the expression of other mucins that are aberrantly expressed in tumors and evaluate its therapeutic and chemosensitizing effect in combination with other natural-derived drugs. Overall, TQ, which has a role in MUC4 downregulation among other antitumorigenic properties, has potential for the development of novel therapies against pancreatic cancer, and further studies must be done to evaluate its therapeutic value in preclinical models.

Supplementary Material

supp figures

Acknowledgments

We thank Erik Moore and Kavita Mallya for their invaluable technical support; Janice A. Tayor and James R. Talaska (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Core Facility, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Victoria B. Smith and Megan Michalak (University of Nebraska Medical Center Cell Analysis Core Facility), and the Eppley Cancer Center for their support of the core facilities; and Kristi L. Berger for editing the manuscript.

Grant Support

NIH grants CA78590, CA111294, CA133774, and CA131944.

Footnotes

Note: Supplementary material for this article is available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. [PubMed]
2. Wong HH, Lemoine NR. Pancreatic cancer: molecular pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:412–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. El Maalouf G, Le Tourneau C, Batty GN, Faivre S, Raymond E. Markers involved in resistance to cytotoxics and targeted therapeutics in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:167–74. [PubMed]
4. Rachagani S, Torres MP, Moniaux N, Batra SK. Current status of mucins in the diagnosis and therapy of cancer. Biofactors. 2009;35:509–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Hollingsworth MA, Swanson BJ. Mucins in cancer: protection and control of the cell surface. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:45–60. [PubMed]
6. Chaturvedi P, Singh AP, Moniaux N, et al. MUC4 mucin potentiates pancreatic tumor cell proliferation, survival, and invasive properties and interferes with its interaction to extracellular matrix proteins. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:309–20. [PubMed]
7. Singh AP, Moniaux N, Chauhan SC, Meza JL, Batra SK. Inhibition of MUC4 expression suppresses pancreatic tumor cell growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2004;64:622–30. [PubMed]
8. Swartz MJ, Batra SK, Varshney GC, et al. MUC4 expression increases progressively in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:791–6. [PubMed]
9. Ho JJ. Mucins in the diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2000;6:1881–96. [PubMed]
10. Bafna S, Kaur S, Momi N, Batra SK. Pancreatic cancer cells resistance to gemcitabine: the role of MUC4 mucin. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1155–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Nagy P, Friedlander E, Tanner M, et al. Decreased accessibility and lack of activation of ErbB2 in JIMT-1, a herceptin-resistant, MUC4-expressing breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 2005;65:473–82. [PubMed]
12. Workman HC, Sweeney C, Carraway KL., III The membrane mucin Muc4 inhibits apoptosis induced by multiple insults via ErbB2-dependent and ErbB2-independent mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2845–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Treasure J. Herbal medicine and cancer: an introductory overview. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2005;21:177–83. [PubMed]
14. Gali-Muhtasib H, Roessner A, Schneider-Stock R. Thymoquinone: a promising anti-cancer drug from natural sources. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38:1249–53. [PubMed]
15. Padhye S, Banerjee S, Ahmad A, Mohammad R, Sarkar FH. From here to eternity—the secret of Pharaohs: therapeutic potential of black cumin seeds and beyond. Cancer Ther. 2008;6:495–510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Ivankovic S, Stojkovic R, Jukic M, Milos M, Milos M, Jurin M. The antitumor activity of thymoquinone and thymohydroquinone in vitro and in vivo. Exp Oncol. 2006;28:220–4. [PubMed]
17. Kaseb AO, Chinnakannu K, Chen D, et al. Androgen receptor and E2F-1 targeted thymoquinone therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7782–8. [PubMed]
18. Shoieb AM, Elgayyar M, Dudrick PS, Bell JL, Tithof PK. In vitro inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis in cancer cell lines by thymoquinone. Int J Oncol. 2003;22:107–13. [PubMed]
19. El-Najjar N, Chatila M, Moukadem H, et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate thymoquinone-induced apoptosis and activate ERK and JNK signaling. Apoptosis. 2010;15:183–95. [PubMed]
20. Worthen DR, Ghosheh OA, Crooks PA. The in vitro anti-tumor activity of some crude and purified components of blackseed, Nigella sativa L. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:1527–32. [PubMed]
21. Al-Ali A, Alkhawajah AA, Randhawa MA, Shaikh NA. Oral and intraperitoneal LD50 of thymoquinone, an active principle of Nigella sativa, in mice and rats. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20:25–7. [PubMed]
22. Chehl N, Chipitsyna G, Gong Q, Yeo CJ, Arafat HA. Anti-inflammatory effects of the Nigella sativa seed extract, thymoquinone, in pancreatic cancer cells. HPB. 2009;11:373–81. [PubMed]
23. Rooney S, Ryan MF. Effects of α-hederin and thymoquinone, constituents of Nigella sativa, on human cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:2199–204. [PubMed]
24. Tan M, Norwood A, May M, Tucci M, Benghuzzi H. Effects of (−)epigallocatechin gallate and thymoquinone on proliferation of a PANC-1 cell line in culture. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2006;42:363–71. [PubMed]
25. Banerjee S, Kaseb AO, Wang Z, et al. Antitumor activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is augmented by thymoquinone in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5575–83. [PubMed]
26. Moniaux N, Varshney GC, Chauhan SC, et al. Generation and characterization of anti-MUC4 monoclonal antibodies reactive with normal and cancer cells in humans. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52:253–61. [PubMed]
27. Andrianifahanana M, Singh AP, Nemos C, et al. IFN-γ-induced expression of MUC4 in pancreatic cancer cells is mediated by STAT-1 upregulation: a novel mechanism for IFN-γ response. Oncogene. 2007;26:7251–61. [PubMed]
28. Cunningham CC. Actin structural proteins in cell motility. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1992;11:69–77. [PubMed]
29. Cunningham CC, Stossel TP, Kwiatkowski DJ. Enhanced motility in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts that overexpress gelsolin. Science. 1991;251:1233–6. [PubMed]
30. Ponnusamy MP, Singh AP, Jain M, Chakraborty S, Moniaux N, Batra SK. MUC4 activates HER2 signalling and enhances the motility of human ovarian cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:520–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Chaturvedi P, Singh AP, Chakraborty S, et al. MUC4 mucin interacts with and stabilizes the HER2 oncoprotein in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2065–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Nahta R, Yu D, Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN, Esteva FJ. Mechanisms of disease: understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3:269–80. [PubMed]
33. Mitra SK, Schlaepfer DD. Integrin-regulated FAK-Src signaling in normal and cancer cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:516–23. [PubMed]
34. Owens LV, Xu L, Dent GA, et al. Focal adhesion kinase as a marker of invasive potential in differentiated human thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:100–5. [PubMed]
35. Wagner EF, Nebreda AR. Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:537–49. [PubMed]
36. Orzechowski A, Jank M, Gajkowska B, Sadkowski T, Godlewskia MM. A novel antioxidant-inhibited dexamethasone-mediated and caspase-3-independent muscle cell death. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1010:205–8. [PubMed]
37. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960–6. [PubMed]
38. Diamantidis M, Tsapournas G, Kountouras J, Zavos C. New aspects of regulatory signaling pathways and novel therapies in pancreatic cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8:12–37. [PubMed]
39. Moniaux N, Andrianifahanana M, Brand RE, Batra SK. Multiple roles of mucins in pancreatic cancer, a lethal and challenging malignancy. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:1633–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Lomako WM, Lomako J, Soto P, Carraway CA, Carraway KL. TGFβ regulation of membrane mucin Muc4 via proteosome degradation. J Cell Biochem. 2009;107:797–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Price-Schiavi SA, Zhu X, Aquinin R, Carraway KL. Sialomucin complex (rat Muc4) is regulated by transforming growth factor β in mammary gland by a novel post-translational mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17800–7. [PubMed]
42. Soto P, Price-Schiavi SA, Carraway KL. SMAD2 and SMAD7 involvement in the post-translational regulation of Muc4 via the transforming growth factor-β and interferon-γ pathways in rat mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20338–44. [PubMed]
43. Yamashita M, Fatyol K, Jin C, Wang X, Liu Z, Zhang YE. TRAF6 mediates Smad-independent activation of JNK and p38 by TGF-β Mol Cell. 2008;31:918–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Zhang R, Humphreys I, Sahu RP, Shi Y, Srivastava SK. In vitro and in vivo induction of apoptosis by capsaicin in pancreatic cancer cells is mediated through ROS generation and mitochondrial death pathway. Apoptosis. 2008;13:1465–78. [PubMed]
45. Kornmann M, Ishiwata T, Kleeff J, Beger HG, Korc M. Fas and Fas-ligand expression in human pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2000;231:368–79. [PubMed]
46. Habiro A, Tanno S, Koizumi K, et al. Involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;316:71–7. [PubMed]