|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The herpes simplex virus Vhs endonuclease degrades host and viral mRNAs. Isolated Vhs cuts any RNA at many sites. Yet, within cells, it targets mRNAs and cuts at preferred sites, including regions of translation initiation. Previous studies have shown that Vhs binds the translation factors eIF4A and eIF4H. Here, we show that Vhs binds the cap-binding complex eIF4F. Association with eIF4F correlated with the ability of Vhs to bind eIF4A but not eIF4H. All Vhs proteins that degrade mRNAs associated with eIF4F. However, simply tethering an active endonuclease to eIF4F is not sufficient to degrade mRNAs. Binding to eIF4H may also be required.
The virion host shutoff (Vhs) (UL41) endonuclease is a component of herpes simplex (HSV) virions (2, 4, 26, 27, 32, 42) that, during lytic infections, accelerates the turnover of many host and viral mRNAs (24). At early times, copies of Vhs from infecting virions degrade many constitutively expressed host mRNAs, with a resultant decrease in translation of the proteins that they encode (9, 11, 31, 38). In addition, Vhs ensures the rapid turnover of most, if not all, viral mRNAs (13, 18, 19, 25, 38), thereby helping to determine viral mRNA levels and facilitating ordered expression of different classes of viral genes. During animal infections, Vhs plays a key role in inhibiting the interferon-mediated antiviral response as well as other components of innate and adaptive immune responses (1, 17, 20-22, 33, 34, 37, 41). As such, it is an important determinant of HSV virulence.
Isolated Vhs has broad substrate specificity. A glutathione S-transferase-Vhs fusion protein cleaves single-stranded RNA to the 3′ side of C and U residues (40). Similarly, a purified complex of recombinant Vhs and cellular eIF4H does not distinguish mRNAs from nonmessenger RNAs and cuts target RNAs at many sites (4). In contrast, within infected cells, Vhs is targeted to mRNAs (12, 18, 19, 31, 36, 38) and cuts mRNAs at preferred sites, including, for some, regions of translation initiation (2, 3, 10). A potential targeting mechanism is suggested by the observation that Vhs binds the cellular translation initiation factors eIF4H and eIF4A (7, 8), which play key roles in cap-dependent ribosome scanning. eIF4A is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that, along with eIF4E and eIF4G, forms the cap-binding complex eIF4F (28, 35). eIF4H binds to and stimulates the helicase activity of eIF4A (29). Vhs and eIF4A can be coimmunoprecipitated, and to date, every mutant or wild-type Vhs polypeptide that degrades mRNA retains the ability to bind eIF4A (8). Binding eIF4H appears to be required for Vhs cleavage since (i) Vhs mutations, which abolish the interaction, abrogate its ability to degrade housekeeping mRNAs (7, 8) and (ii) small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of eIF4H prior to infection abrogates Vhs degradation (30).
The data suggest a model in which Vhs is targeted to mRNAs and regions of translation initiation by associating with eIF4F. However, the fact that Vhs binds eIF4A and eIF4H does not necessarily imply that it is targeted through eIF4F. Within cells, eIF4A exists in a free form and as a component of eIF4F (23, 39), and it is unknown to which form or forms Vhs binds. Similarly, it is unclear whether a molecule of eIF4H that has bound Vhs can still bind eIF4A. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether Vhs associates with eIF4F cap-binding complexes isolated by binding to 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose 4B beads.
To this end, eIF4F complexes were prepared from HeLa cells 10 h after infection with 10 PFU/cell of wild-type HSV-1 (strain KOS) or mock infection. Briefly, cells were lysed by resuspension in 1 ml per 2 × 107 cells of binding buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA) containing 0.5% (vol/vol) NP-40 (6). Nuclei were pelleted, and 1-ml aliquots of the cytoplasmic supernatant were incubated for 1 h at 4°C with 300 μl (settled volume) of Sepharose 4B (Sigma). After the beads were pelleted, 150-μl aliquots of the supernatant were incubated for 1 h with 20 μl (settled volume) of either 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose 4B (Applied Biosystems) or Sepharose 4B. The beads were pelleted and washed three times with binding buffer containing 1 mM GTP. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in a small volume of SDS sample buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 2% [wt/vol] SDS, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, 5% [vol/vol] β-mercaptoethanol) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using polyclonal antiserum against a Vhs-LacZ fusion protein (26) or eIF4A2 (Novus Biologicals) or monoclonal antibody against eIF4E (BD Biosciences) or eIF4G (Cell Signaling Technologies). Vhs was isolated with material that bound 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose 4B (see Fig. Fig.1A,1A, ,2A,2A, and and3),3), as were the eIF4F components eIF4E (Fig. (Fig.1A,1A, ,2A,2A, and and3),3), eIF4G (Fig. (Fig.2A2A and and3),3), and eIF4A (Fig. (Fig.3).3). However, neither Vhs nor any of the eIF4F components bound detectably to Sepharose 4B. A similar result was observed for in vitro-synthesized Vhs. In this case, [35S]methionine-labeled Vhs was synthesized by in vitro transcription and translation using a TNT T7 coupled transcription/translation kit (Promega) and detected by autoradiography. As in infected cells, in vitro-translated Vhs associated with material that bound 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose 4B but not Sepharose 4B (Fig. (Fig.1B1B).
To check binding specificity, we determined whether soluble 7-methyl GTP would compete with 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose 4B for binding to eIF4F and reduce the amounts of Vhs and eIF4F components that bound the resin. Binding assays were performed as described for Fig. Fig.1,1, except cytoplasmic extracts or rabbit reticulocyte lysates were supplemented with various concentrations of 7-methyl GTP 10 min prior to addition of the resin. Inclusion of a soluble cap analog caused a dose-dependent reduction in the amounts of eIF4E and eIF4G that were recovered with the bound material (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A). 7-Methyl GTP significantly reduced the amounts of in vivo (Fig. (Fig.2A)-2A)- and in vitro (Fig. (Fig.2B)-synthesized2B)-synthesized Vhs associated with material that bound the resin, indicating that the association was due to binding of Vhs to eIF4F and not directly to the beads.
We next examined whether the putative Vhs-eIF4F complex exhibited characteristics expected of eIF4F in intact cells. Specifically, we examined whether hypertonic shock, an event that disrupts eIF4F, abolished the association of Vhs with material that bound 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose and whether the subsequent return of the cells to isotonic medium, with the resultant reassembly of eIF4F, restored the binding of Vhs to the beads. This is an attractive system because the disruption of eIF4F by hypertonic shock is both rapid and reversible (15, 16). Briefly, HeLa cells were infected with 10 PFU/cell of wild-type HSV-1 (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). Ten hours later, the medium was replaced with medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl in addition to that which is present in normal medium. Cells were harvested and lysed, and cytoplasmic extracts were prepared immediately or at various times thereafter. For some cultures, the medium was removed after 60 min and replaced with normal isotonic medium. Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared at various times after reversal of the shock. Binding assays were performed to analyze proteins that bound 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose. As expected, hypertonic shock disrupted eIF4F, as evidenced by the loss of eIF4A and eIF4G from material that bound 7-methyl GTP-Sepharose (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). This disruption was detectable within 15 min and complete by 60 min after exposure of the cells to hypertonic medium. eIF4E is the cap-binding component of eIF4F and continued to bind the resin, even during hypertonic stress. Restoration of isotonic conditions led to reassembly of much, although not all, of the eIF4F complex within 60 min. Of most significance, hypertonic shock caused the rapid disappearance of Vhs from material that bound the resin, followed by reassociation of some Vhs with 7-methyl GTP binding material within 60 min after reversal of the shock (Fig. (Fig.3C).3C). The results indicate that Vhs is an authentic eIF4F-interacting protein and that this interaction does not result from Vhs binding eIF4E.
Next, we examined the effect of various Vhs mutations on its association with eIF4F. Mutant and wild-type Vhs polypeptides were synthesized by in vitro transcription and translation, and equal amounts were assayed for eIF4F binding as described for Fig. Fig.1B.1B. The results are tabulated in Fig. Fig.44 to show the relative amounts of wild-type and mutant proteins that bound eIF4F, as well as their binding to eIF4A and eIF4H, and their ability to degrade housekeeping mRNAs, as determined in earlier studies (5, 7, 8). The data allow several conclusions. First, truncation of the protein from the C terminus to 382 amino acids had no detectable effect on its binding to eIF4F (Fig. (Fig.4,4, line 6). In contrast, deletion of the first 211 amino acids reduced the interaction to an undetectable level (Fig. (Fig.4,4, line 3). Thus, sequences within the first 211 amino acids of Vhs are required for eIF4F binding, and the first 382 amino acids are sufficient. Second, binding to eIF4H is not required for the association of Vhs with eIF4F since several mutations abolished Vhs binding to eIF4H but did not affect its interaction with eIF4F. Third, the association of Vhs with eIF4F correlated with its ability to bind eIF4A, since every polypeptide that associated with eIF4F bound eIF4A, and mutations that reduced or abolished eIF4A binding also reduced or abolished the eIF4F interaction. However, the data should be interpreted cautiously since, to date, every mutation we have identified that reduces eIF4A binding also affects binding to eIF4H, suggesting that these mutant proteins may contain structural changes that affect multiple functions. Finally, while the data are consistent with the idea that eIF4F binding is required for Vhs degradation of mRNAs that are translated by cap-dependent scanning, simple tethering of an active Vhs endonuclease to the cap through eIF4F cannot be sufficient for Vhs-mediated decay. The T214I mutant retains endonuclease activity (14) and binds eIF4A and eIF4F yet does not degrade housekeeping mRNAs. However, it lacks the ability to bind eIF4H. These and previous data (5, 7, 8) suggest that binding to both eIF4H and eIF4F may be required for Vhs degradation of scanned mRNAs. Clearly, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms of Vhs targeting.
We thank Lora Shiflett, Jouliana Sadek, Deepali Agarwal, and our other colleagues at the University of Missouri—Kansas City for many helpful discussions.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant R01 AI-21501 to G.S.R. from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Published ahead of print on 28 April 2010.