The current work tested the hypothesis that triclosan decreased serum T4 via upregulation of hepatic catabolism and altered expression of cellular transport proteins. Consistent with this hypothesis, we report here that triclosan upregulates both mRNA expression and activity of some phase I and phase II hepatic enzymes. Contradictory to this hypothesis was the lack of effects on any measured hepatic cellular transporters. Furthermore, the pattern of effects on hepatic mRNA for CYP and UGT isoforms suggests that the initiating event in the mode of action for triclosan-induced hypothyroxinemia is activation of hepatic CAR and PXR receptors.
Consistent with previous reports, oral exposure to triclosan produced hypothyroxinemia. Dose-responsive T4 decreases have been observed following both 4-day exposures (
Crofton et al., 2007) and 31-day exposures (
Zorrilla et al., 2009). Effective doses that reduced T4 by 20% in the 4-day exposures used in this work (BMD = 99.4 mg/kg/day) were higher compared with the smaller 4-day assay data set published previously by this laboratory (BMD = 69.7 mg/kg/day) (
Crofton et al., 2007). The effective dose that reduced T4 by 20% following a 31-day triclosan exposure (BMD = 14.5 mg/kg/day) was much lower (
Zorrilla et al., 2009) than those in the current study, likely due to the differences in exposure duration as well as the sex, age, and strain of rats used. Strain may be a particularly important uncertainty in directly comparing studies of thyroid disruption as background levels of THs and metabolic responses may differ between strains (
Lecureux et al., 2009).
T3 and TSH were also assessed to more fully characterize the impact of triclosan on circulating thyroid and pituitary hormones. The decreases (12–25%) in T3 observed at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day were consistent with the previous reports that T3 was decreased ~20% after 31 days of 200 mg/kg/day triclosan treatment (
Zorrilla et al., 2009). No change in TSH with triclosan treatment is also consistent with a previous report (
Zorrilla et al., 2009). Other chemicals including polychlorinated biphenyls and 3-methylcholanthrene have significantly decreased T4 with no effects on TSH (
Hood et al., 1999;
Liu et al., 1995); this phenomenon of decreased T4 without compensatory TSH increase, while not well understood, has been hypothesized to result from a lack of induction of T3 glucuronidation (
Barter & Klaassen, 1994;
Hood & Klaassen, 2000).
Triclosan exposure increased enzymatic and mRNA markers of activity and expression of
Cyp2b1/2 and
Cyp3a1/23, suggesting that triclosan may activate nuclear receptors CAR and/or PXR. Increased PROD activity implies increased Cyp2b1/2 protein. This is consistent with previous
in vitro and
in vivo observations of triclosan-induced PROD activity and Cyp2b1/2 protein (
Hanioka et al., 1996,
1997;
Jinno et al., 1997;
Zorrilla et al., 2009).
Zorrilla et al. (2009) also found PROD activity increases
in vivo following 31-day exposures (BMD = 14.31 mg/kg/day) (
Burke et al., 1994), compared with 70.8 mg/kg/day, obtained in the present study. Relative mRNA expression of
Cyp2b1/2 and
Cyp3a1/23 increased significantly. This suggests that triclosan may be capable of interacting with both CAR and PXR, consistent with activation of PXR
in vitro in a human (HuH7 culture) receptor reporter assay (
Jacobs et al., 2005). Currently, there are no published reports of triclosan activity toward CAR. However, our observations of increased Cyp2b1/2 activity and expression indicate potential CAR activation (
Qatanani et al., 2005;
Sueyoshi et al., 1999).
EROD activity decreased slightly, and was not dose responsive, corresponding well to the lack of significant changes to
Cyp1a1 mRNA expression; collectively, these data imply that aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation is not a key step in this mode of action. No constitutive expression of Cyp1a1 protein in rat liver and no induction of
Cyp1a1 mRNA with triclosan treatment suggest that these EROD decreases do not reflect Cyp1a1 activity inhibition but rather the inhibition of one or more of several CYPs, including Cyp2c11 (
Burke et al., 1994). Previous work with rat liver microsomes demonstrated that triclosan competitively inhibited EROD induction by 3-methylcholanthrene, a prototypical microsomal enzyme inducer of EROD and Cyp1a1 activities (
Hanioka et al., 1996). However, the failure of triclosan to induce EROD is inconsistent with a report of triclosan agonism of AhR; triclosan activated AhR to 40% of the level of activation of TCDD and inhibited TCDD activation by 30%, suggesting a competitive interaction (
Ahn et al., 2008).
Importantly, the lack of
Cyp1a1 induction demonstrates that the minor dioxin contaminates found in the triclosan sample used in this study, 2,8,-dichlorodibenzodioxin and 2,4,8-trichlorodibenzodioxin, did not induce AhR-mediated effects on phase I and phase II hepatic enzymes. 2,8-dichlorodibenzodioxin is a very weak AhR agonist
in vitro and failed to induce EROD
in vivo (
Mason & Safe, 1986).
Phase II glucuronidation and sulfation are upregulated by triclosan treatment, suggesting that triclosan treatment increases hepatic T4 conjugation. Observations of a twofold increase in glucuronidation activity of T4 and a 2.2-fold increase in
Ugt1a1 mRNA expression suggest small increases in T4-UGT activity result from triclosan exposure. Increases in glucuronidation result in increased biliary excretion of conjugated hormone (
Barter & Klaassen, 1994;
Liu et al., 1995;
Vansell & Klaassen, 2001,
2002). Previous work in this laboratory and others has found that UGT activity may not have a clear linear relationship with T4 concentrations (
Craft et al., 2002;
Hood & Klaassen, 2000). Another major uncertainty regarding the testing of UGT isoforms for mRNA expression levels is the choice of isoforms to test. This work tested isoforms responsible for hepatic conjugation of T4 in rat, Ugt1a1 and Ugt1a6 (
Vansell & Klaassen, 2002), as well as a marker of T3 glucuronidation, Ugt2b5 (
Richardson et al., 2008;
Vansell & Klaassen, 2002). Whereas mRNA expression of
Ugt1a1 and
Ugt1a6 can be found in the liver,
Ugt1a7, which also conjugates T4, appears to be constitutively expressed mainly in the intestine of rats (
Shelby et al., 2003) and inducible in liver by AhR agonists (
Metz et al., 2000). Thus,
Ugt1a7 was excluded from analysis as an amplification efficiency in the appropriate range could not be determined for analysis by qRT-PCR. No changes in expression were observed for
Ugt1a6 or
Ugt2b5. In comparing the T4-UGT activity and mRNA expression data, it appears likely that the approximately twofold increase in T4-UGT activity may be attributed to increases observed in
Ugt1a1 mRNA expression.
While increased activity and expression of UGT isoforms support the overall hypothesis that triclosan treatment induces glucuronidation of TH, these data do not confirm a particular nuclear receptor pathway as CAR, PXR, and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) all transcriptionally regulate isoform
Ugt1a1 (
Sugatani et al., 2005).
Ugt1a6 is more exclusively controlled by the AhR (
Auyeung et al., 2003); the lack of expression change for
Ugt1a6 complements the unchanged expression of
Cyp1a1 and EROD activity. This is consistent with the lack of AhR activation by triclosan and the lack of an AhR contribution to the end points measured in the current work.
Triclosan exposure increased sulfotransferase
Sult1c1 mRNA expression 2.6-fold, indicating that increased sulfation and biliary excretion of T4 may occur. Sulfation deactivates T4 and increases its biliary excretion via enhancement of inner ring deiodination and blockage of outer ring deiodination for reactivation (
Kester et al., 2003). Triclosan noncompetitively inhibits the
in vitro human hepatic microsomal sulfation of 3-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene (3-OH-BaP), bisphenol A (BPA),
p-nitrophenol, and acetaminophen with IC
50 concentrations in the low micromolar concentration range; competitive inhibition of the glucuronidation of 3-OH-BaP, BPA, and acetaminophen was also observed (
Wang et al., 2004). Thus, triclosan may exert an inhibitory action on SULT and UGT catabolic enzymes, affecting the overall activity profile of UGTs and SULTs
in vivo. An uncertainty in our analysis is choice of sulfotransferases to test; sulfation of THs is catalyzed primarily by Sult1b1 and Sult1c1 in the rat, although the preferred substrate for these enzymes is actually not the physiologically relevant TH (T3) but rather a T3 metabolite (T2) (
Kester et al., 2003). Any future use of these data in extrapolation to potential human effects is complicated by the sex dependence of
Sult1c1 expression in rats (
Wong et al., 2005), which signals a potentially sexually dimorphic response to triclosan with respect to sulfotransferase expression changes. Male-dominant expression of
Sult1c1 reflects sex-dependent T3 sulfation in rats, which is not known to occur in humans (
Kaptein et al., 1997). Our observations report mRNA expression changes in female rats; however, the major change noted in sulfotransferases activity for triclosan treatment groups was upregulation of
Sult1c1, which is expressed predominantly in male rat liver, kidney, and intestine; expression of
Sult1b1 is equivalent between rat sexes (
Kester et al., 2003; Dunn and Klaassen, 1998).
No statistically significant changes were observed in the mRNA expression of hepatic transporters, including
Oatp1a1,
Oatp1a4,
Mrp2, and
Mdr1. These particular transporters were chosen for analysis based on their functional activity and affinity for iodothyronines (
Wong et al., 2005) as well as several previous literature reports of microsomal enzyme inducer effects on these transporters (
Cheng et al., 2005;
Johnson & Klaassen, 2002b;
Klaassen & Slitt, 2005;
Kretschmer & Baldwin, 2005;
Wong et al., 2005). These mRNA expression results suggest that transporter expression changes do not contribute to the observed T4 decreases. However, these results do not exclude the possibility that hepatic transporter protein activity is altered by triclosan treatment via receptor-mediated posttranslational modifications (
Cherrington et al., 2002). The mRNA expression of
Mrp2 may not be indicative of the
in vivo protein expression as PXR ligands that induce Cyp3a have been shown to increase Mrp2 protein without increasing
Mrp2 expression (
Johnson & Klaassen, 2002a). Other PXR ligands, including DMP-904 (
Wong et al., 2005), PCN, and spironolactone (
Cheng et al., 2005), and CAR ligands, including phenobarbital (
Cherrington et al., 2002), have previously demonstrated effects on the regulation of hepatic transporter mRNA expression. Further characterization of the hepatic transporter activity of the liver in response to triclosan treatment will be necessary to conclude definitively that transporters are or are not involved in triclosan-induced hypothyroxinemia.
This work suggests that triclosan upregulates phase II glucuronidation and sulfation and that this increased catabolism may be at least partially responsible for the triclosan-induced hypothyroxinemia observed. This is consistent with other microsomal enzyme inducers including phenobarbital, polychlorinated biphenyls, pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile, dioxins, and others (
Liu et al., 1995;
Schuur et al., 1998). Correlation plots (data not shown) of T4 concentration versus UGT activity and
Ugt1a1 and
Sult1c1 expression revealed significant linear model fit (
p < 0.05), but poor
R-squared values (
R2 = 0.07–0.18), suggesting that other mechanisms contribute to the T4 decreases observed. Triclosan may exert a direct effect on the thyroid and TH synthesis; however, preliminary data in
ex vivo porcine thyroid peroxidase assays indicate no effect of triclosan (Hornung, personal communication). Other mechanisms that could contribute to the observed hypothyroxinemia, including inhibition of iodide uptake, competition with TH serum–binding proteins, and upregulation of deiodinase activity, have not been assessed.
Extrapolation of the current findings to humans should be tempered by a number of uncertainties, including the dose range used herein versus estimated human exposures. The BMDL for a 20% decrease in T4 calculated from the data presented is 65.6 mg/kg/day in a 4-day exposure scenario. This short-term exposure model is intended for use as a tool in exploring mechanisms of thyroid disruption and does not model prolonged daily human exposure. The target human population of interest due to the presence of triclosan in breast milk and its potential to disrupt TH, and subsequent adverse impacts on neurological development, is the developing neonate and infant. Human infant daily oral exposure is estimated to be 0.005 mg/kg/day (
U.S. EPA, 2008). Thus, comparing our BMDL to this daily intake yields a margin of exposure of ~13,000-fold. Note that this does not take into account uncertainty factors used in the extrapolation of data obtained in rats to human risk; pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences in triclosan metabolism between species may greatly impact the relative effects.
The present work confirms the conclusion that triclosan disrupts thyroxine and triiodothyronine in the rat. Furthermore, the effects of triclosan on hepatic mRNA and enzymatic activity point out important key events in one potential mode of action of triclosan-induced hypothyroxinemia in rats and suggest that CAR/PXR activation, with subsequent upregulation of hepatic catabolism of T4, may be one mechanism that contributes to the observed hypothyroxinemia. In order to improve the ability to extrapolate these findings to humans, future research should characterize interspecies similarities and differences in these key events.