PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2010; 5(7): e11526.
Published online 2010 July 12. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0011526
PMCID: PMC2902508

Frog α- and β-Ryanodine Receptors Provide Distinct Intracellular Ca2+ Signals in a Myogenic Cell Line

Arnold Schwartz, Editor

Abstract

Background

In frog skeletal muscle, two ryanodine receptor (RyR) isoforms, α-RyR and β-RyR, are expressed in nearly equal amounts. However, the roles and significance of the two isoforms in excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling remains to be elucidated.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this study, we expressed either or both α-RyR and β-RyR in 1B5 RyR-deficient myotubes using the herpes simplex virus 1 helper-free amplicon system. Immunological characterizations revealed that α-RyR and β-RyR are appropriately expressed and targeted at the junctions in 1B5 myotubes. In Ca2+ imaging studies, each isoform exhibited caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients, an indicative of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR). However, the fashion of Ca2+ release events was fundamentally different: α-RyR mediated graded and sustained Ca2+ release observed uniformly throughout the cytoplasm, whereas β-RyR supported all-or-none type regenerative Ca2+ oscillations and waves. α-RyR but not β-RyR exhibited Ca2+ transients triggered by membrane depolarization with high [K+]o that were nifedipine-sensitive, indicating that only α-RyR mediates depolarization-induced Ca2+ release. Myotubes co-expressing α-RyR and β-RyR demonstrated high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients which were indistinguishable from those with myotubes expressing α-RyR alone. Furthermore, procaine did not affect the peak height of high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients, suggesting minor amplification of Ca2+ release by β-RyR via CICR in 1B5 myotubes.

Conclusions/Significance

These findings suggest that α-RyR and β-RyR provide distinct intracellular Ca2+ signals in a myogenic cell line. These distinct properties may also occur in frog skeletal muscle and will be important for E-C coupling.

Introduction

In vertebrate striated muscles, depolarization of transverse (T) tubule membranes triggers Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in a process known as excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling. The Ca2+ release is mediated through the ryanodine receptor (RyR), a large homotetrameric channel complex (>2 MDa) in the SR membrane [1], [2]. In vertebrates there are three genetically distinct isoforms of RyR (RyR1–3). All the RyR channels exhibit Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR), in which Ca2+ itself activates the channel to release Ca2+ [3], [4]. In cardiac muscle, depolarization of the T-tubule activates the L-type Ca2+ channel (dihydropyridine receptor, DHPR) to enter extracellular Ca2+ into the cells. This entering Ca2+, in turn, triggers Ca2+ release from the RyR2 (predominant isoform in heart) via the CICR mechanism [5]. In skeletal muscle E-C coupling, in contrast, no extracellular Ca2+ entry is necessary. Ca2+ release from the RyR1 (predominant isoform in skeletal muscle) instead is triggered by conformational change of the voltage sensor in the DHPR upon depolarization of the T tubule (referred to as depolarization-induced Ca2+ release, DICR) [6], [7]. In DICR, some physical association between RyR and DHPR at the triad junction may be involved.

Adult mammalian skeletal muscles predominantly express RyR1. A small amount of RyR3 is also expressed in some adult muscles (diaphragm and soleus) and in most neonatal muscles [8], [9]. Functional studies with the RyR1-deficient ‘dyspedic’ mice revealed that RyR1 acts both as DICR and CICR channels, whereas RyR3 mediates CICR but not DICR [10], [11], [12]. Skeletal muscles of frog and many non-mammalian vertebrates have two isoforms of α-RyR and β-RyR, homologues of mammalian RyR1 and RyR3, respectively, in nearly equal amounts [13], [14]. β-RyR is proposed to be localized at the parajunctional position in the triad, which is adjacent to α-RyR at the junctional face [15]. In non-mammalian skeletal muscles, DICR is believed to be mediated by α-RyR because of its homology with mammalian RyR1 [16], [17], [18]. This is also suggested by the finding that some skeletal muscles of fish and chicken express α-RyR alone [19]. It has been proposed that the CICR activity of β-RyR may be >20-fold higher than that of α-RyR in frog skeletal muscle SR [20]. It was therefore hypothesized that the two isoforms may play distinct roles in Ca2+ release: DICR is mediated by α-RyR, whereas CICR is primarily supported by β-RyR [21]. However, there is no direct evidence for this hypothesis so far.

The RyR-deficient 1B5 myogenic cell line is a useful tool to investigate RyR isoforms [22]. They differentiate into multinucleated myotubes and express all of the normal key triadic proteins (e.g., DHPR complex, FKBP12, calsequestrin, junctin and triadin) but do not express any RyR isoform. Exogenous RyR can be targeted to the triad junction and restores E-C coupling in 1B5 myotubes [22], [23]. Thus, 1B5 cells provide a skeletal muscle context that is essential for proper function of RyRs. In this study, we expressed frog α-RyR and β-RyR in 1B5 myotubes to investigate physiological roles of the two RyR isoforms in muscle. We found that α-RyR but not β-RyR mediates DICR. In addition, the two isoforms demonstrated distinct Ca2+ release properties induced by caffeine. Our results suggest that the two RyR isoforms provide distinct intracellular Ca2+ signals in frog skeletal muscle.

Methods

Preparation of HSV-1 virus

cDNAs encoding the full-length bullfrog α-RyR and β-RyR (GenBank No. D21070 and D21071, respectively) were constructed from the partial cDNA clones [16] and then cloned into an HSV-1 amplicon vector pHSVprPUC [24]. The vector was co-transfected with DNA from the cosmid set into 2–2 cells to produce the HSV-1 virus using a helper virus-free packaging system [24]. Control virus lacking RyR gene was similarly produced with the amplicon vector without RyR cDNAs. Viral titers were determined immunohistochemically with BHK cells by counting the RyR-positive cells after infection of a fixed amount of the virus solution.

Cell culture and viral infection

1B5 cells were cultured in growth medium (DMEM supplemented with 20% FCS, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulphate, 100 units/ml penicillin-G) in 5% CO2 [22]. Cells were allowed to differentiate into myotubes by replacing the growth medium with differentiation medium (DMEM with 1% heat-inactivated horse serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulphate, 100 units/ml penicillin-G) in 18% CO2 for 5 days. Myotubes were then infected with the HSV-1 virus for 2 h at 5×104 virion particles per well and further cultured for 24 h. Mock infection was achieved using the control virus.

Western blotting

1B5 myotubes cultured on 60 mm dishes were infected with the HSV-1 virus as described above. After 24 h infection myotubes were scraped from plates and centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000×g. The pellet was homogenized in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% Triton X-100 and a cocktail of protease inhibitors, and the homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000×g. The protein in the supernatant was processed by SDS-PAGE with a 2–12% gradient gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. RyRs were detected by polyclonal anti-RyR antibody which was raised against synthetic peptide corresponding to a sequence that was conserved among all known RyRs [25]. The positive bands were visualized using ECL Advance Western Blotting Detection Kit (GE Healthcare).

Immunohistochemistry

1B5 cells cultured on a glass-bottom 35-mm plate were fixed in ice-cold methanol for 10 min at −20°C and then blocked for 1 hr in PBS supplemented with 1% BSA. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. RyR was detected with monoclonal anti-RyR antibody 34C (Development Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa) [26], whereas DHPR was detected with polyclonal anti-DHPR α1s subunit antibody that was raised against the synthetic peptide corresponding to 734–747 of bullfrog α1s [27]. After washing three times for 10 min with PBS, cells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa488-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and Alexa594-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes). After successive washing with PBS, the fluorescence signal was viewed on a laser scanning confocal microscope (Oz system; Noran Instruments) equipped with an Argon Krypton Ion Laser System (488 and 568 nm excitation).

Ca2+ imaging

For Ca2+ imaging, 1B5 myotubes were cultured as described above on a 96-well clear bottom plate (Corning Costar) that had been treated with Matrigel (BD Bioscience). After 24 h infection the myotubes were loaded with 5 µM fluo-4 AM (Molecular Probes) for 30 min at 37°C in a bath solution (130 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.9 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 11 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2 adjusted with NaOH). The cells were set on an inverted microscope equipped with a fluorescence imaging system (AquaCosmos, Hamamatsu, Japan). Fluo-4 was excited at 488 nm using a xenon arc lamp with a monochrometer and fluorescence emission through a band-pass filter (535/45) was recorded with a CCD camera using a 10× objective lens (AquaCosmos, Hamamatsu). All measurements were carried out at room temperature (22–25°C). The ratio signals (F/F0) of individual myotubes were determined. To stimulate the myotubes, solutions (1 ml) were perfused into the wells by suction. Solutions with different concentrations of K+ (high [K+]o, 20–130 mM) were made in order to keep [K+]× [Cl] constant by replacing chloride with methanesulfonate. Caffeine (0.2–20 mM) was dissolved in the bath solution. CaCl2 was omitted from the bath solution prior to and during stimuli to prevent Ca2+ influx via the sarcolemma.

Results

Expression of frog RyR isoforms in differentiated 1B5 myotubes

Frog RyR isoforms were expressed in 1B5 myotubes by transducing them with helper free HSV-1 amplicon virions (5×105 infectious units/ml) [24] containing either bullfrog α-RyR or β-RyR cDNA. A single band with high molecular mass was detected by anti-RyR antibody in total lysate from myotubes transduced with α-RyR or β-RyR virions, whereas no band was seen in the mock-infected myotubes (Fig. 1A). The mobility of each band corresponds to that of the native proteins from frog skeletal muscle SR, suggesting expression of full-length proteins. Immunohistochemistry with RyR specific antibody (34C) showed that myotubes were labeled by the antibody throughout the cytoplasm except for the nuclei (Fig. 1B). Closer examinations revealed that α-RyR and β-RyR exist as discrete foci that were located close to the cell surface (Fig. 1C). These foci appear to be co-localized with the DHPR (Fig. 1C). Taken together, these findings indicate that frog α-RyR and β-RyR are properly expressed and targeted at the triad junctions in 1B5 myotubes.

Figure 1
Expression of α-RyR and β-RyR in differentiated 1B5 myotubes.

Depolarization-induced and caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients of 1B5 myotubes expressing frog RyR isoforms

DICR and CICR activity of frog RyR isoforms were investigated by intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) measurements of individual cells using fluo-4 (see Materials and Methods). DICR activity was evaluated from Ca2+ release induced by high potassium in the bath solution (high [K+]o), which triggers membrane depolarization. CICR activity was assessed by caffeine-induced Ca2+ release. To exclude the possibility of Ca2+ influx via the sarcolemma, Ca2+ was omitted from the bath solution prior to and during stimuli.

In mock-infected myotubes, neither high [K+]o (up to 80 mM) nor caffeine (up to 20 mM) triggered Ca2+ transients, corresponding to a lack of detected RyRs (data not shown). The efficiency of HSV virion transduction was ~80%. All myotubes successfully transduced with α-RyR virions exhibited Ca2+ transients induced by increasing [K+]o in a dose-dependent manner and seemed to reach a plateau at 80 mM [K+]o (Fig. 2A, 2B). They also had Ca2+ transients after perfusion with 20 mM caffeine. By contrast, the myotubes transduced with β-RyR responded to caffeine, but no myotubes were responsive to high [K+]o up to 80 mM. Lack of high [K+]o response in β-RyR does not stem from improper expression or targeting of the isoform, because it was expressed as a full-length protein and co-localized with the DHPR (see Fig. 1). The [K+]o dependence of Ca2+ transients by α-RyR demonstrated that the EC50 value of [K+]o was about 28 mM (Fig. 2B), which is in good agreement with the values determined by high [K+]o-induced tension development in intact skeletal muscle fibers [28], [29]. The Increasing [K+]o also accelerated the time-dependent decline in [Ca2+]i which can be explained by inactivation of the voltage sensor (Fig. 2A). The high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients were strongly inhibited by 10 µM nifedipine, which selectively blocks the DHPR voltage sensor (Fig. 2C, 2D). This is consistent with the properties of DICR in frog and mammalian skeletal muscles [6], [7] and indicates that frog α-RyR but not β-RyR mediates DICR that is coupled to and controlled by endogenous DHPRs in 1B5 myotubes.

Figure 2
Depolarization-induced Ca2+ release.

Fig. 3 demonstrates caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients of myotubes expressing α-RyR or β-RyR. Myotubes expressing α-RyR exhibited dose-dependent Ca2+ transients in response to caffeine with only a slight decline in signal during a 30 sec exposure (Fig. 3A). The peak amplitude of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ release increased with caffeine dose and saturated around 10 mM (Fig. 3A, 3C). Myotubes expressing β-RyR exhibited Ca2+ oscillations with rapid rise and fall phases (like a burst of spikes) during exposure to caffeine (0.2–20 mM) (Fig. 3B). Notably, there are large cell-to-cell variations in threshold concentrations for caffeine. The individual Ca2+ transients tended to be longer in duration at a higher caffeine dose, and some cells exhibited long-lasting (>10 sec) Ca2+ transients when the caffeine concentration was 5 mM or higher. The peak amplitude of Ca2+ oscillations was constantly high in an all-or-none fashion, irrespective of caffeine dose (Fig. 3C). The peak amplitude of β-RyR is greater than the maximum response of α-RyR, which shows a sustained Ca2+ release (Fig. 3B, 3C). The fraction of responding cells increased with caffeine dose (Fig. 3D). This is in marked contrast to myotubes expressing α-RyR, where all expressing myotubes responded to the caffeine doses examined in a graded manner (Fig. 3A, 3D).

Figure 3
Caffeine-induced Ca2+ release.

Spatiotemporal properties of Ca2+ transients of 1B5 myotubes expressing frog RyR isoforms

The above results suggest a substantial difference in Ca2+ release properties of α-RyR and β-RyR. To deepen understanding of the Ca2+ release mechanism, we investigated spatiotemporal properties of Ca2+ transients of the two RyR isoforms. Caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients in myotubes expressing α-RyR occurred uniformly within the cell (Movie S1). Line scan analysis along their longitudinal axes of the myotubes clearly demonstrates a uniform increase in Ca2+ throughout the cell (Fig. 4A). Similar responses were also observed when myotubes were stimulated with high [K+]o (Fig. 4A, Movie S2). In contrast, myotubes expressing β-RyR exhibited Ca2+ waves, which occurred at specific sites and propagated within cells (Fig. 4B, Movie S3). At a higher caffeine doses in cells expressing β-RyR (≥5 mM), the initial Ca2+ transients occurred almost instantaneously throughout the myotubes, followed by the repetitive Ca2+ waves. Notably, velocity of the Ca2+ waves increased with caffeine dose, although substantial cell-to-cell variations were apparent (Figs. 4C). Averaged velocities of Ca2+ waves in myotubes expressing β-RyR were 15±3 µm/sec at 0.2 mM caffeine, 18±2 µm/sec at 0.5 mM caffeine, 30±4 µm/sec at 1 mM caffeine, 44±5 µm/sec at 2 mM caffeine, and 72±9 µm/sec at 5 mM caffeine (Fig. 4D). The velocities are similar with those of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ waves of frog skeletal muscle [30] as well as the other cell types [31], [32]. These findings suggest that α-RyR and β-RyR have distinct spatiotemporal properties of Ca2+ release in 1B5 myotubes.

Figure 4
Spatiotemporal properties of Ca2+ release.

Depolarization-induced and caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients of 1B5 myotubes expressing both RyR isoforms

It has been proposed that CICR of β-RyR may serve to amplify the Ca2+ signals of DICR by α-RyR [33]. To assess this possibility, we expressed both isoforms in 1B5 myotubes and examined their Ca2+ release properties. 1B5 myotubes were transduced with a mixture of α-RyR and β-RyR virions. Immunoblotting of total lysate of the infected myotubes revealed that α-RyR and β-RyR were expressed in nearly equal amounts (Fig. 5A). These myotubes exhibited caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients that consisted of Ca2+ oscillations and the sustained Ca2+ rise, which correspond to the combined phenotype of cells expressing the individual isoforms (Fig. 5B). This confirmed functional expression of both α-RyR and β-RyR in the myotubes. The two isoforms were independent of each other in their Ca2+ release fashion. The overall features of high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients in myotubes expressing the two isoforms, however, were similar to those with myotubes expressing α-RyR alone (Fig. 5C). Neither Ca2+ oscillations nor waves observed during the stimuli. The averaged amplitude and [K+]o dependence of the Ca2+ transients were not significantly different from those of myotubes expressing α-RyR alone (Fig. 5D). Thus, co-expression of β-RyR did not affect DICR of α-RyR.

Figure 5
Ca2+ release properties of 1B5 myotubes co-expressing α-RyR and β-RyR.

To further evaluate the role of β-RyR on DICR, we examined the effect of procaine, an inhibitor of CICR, on the Ca2+ transients of myotubes co-expressing α-RyR and β-RyR. Procaine (10 mM) abolished the Ca2+ oscillations induced by lower concentrations ([less, double equals]5 mM) of caffeine (Fig. 6A) and reduced the caffeine sensitivity by nearly fivefold (Fig. 6B), suggesting that CICR via β-RyR is strongly inhibited by procaine. The sustained Ca2+ rises probably caused by α-RyR were also reduced by procaine (Fig. 6A). Similar inhibition of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release by procaine was observed with myotubes expressing α-RyR or β-RyR alone (data not shown). These findings suggest that procaine effectively inhibited CICR of α-RyR and β-RyR. In contrast, procaine did not affect the peak value of high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients (Fig. 6C, 6D) but it did accelerate the subsequent decline of the Ca2+ transients (Fig. 6C). This is consistent with the reports that procaine did not inhibit activation of the DHPR voltage sensor and consequent Ca2+ release, but it accelerated the inactivation process [34], [35]. Taken together, these findings suggest that CICR by β-RyR may make only a minor contribution to Ca2+ signals of DICR on membrane depolarization in 1B5 myotubes.

Figure 6
Effect of procaine on Ca2+ release properties of 1B5 myotubes co-expressing α-RyR and β-RyR.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the functions and roles of two RyR isoforms (α-RyR and β-RyR) in frog skeletal muscle by expressing them in 1B5 myotubes. 1B5 myotubes have been derived from mouse and successfully used for functional reconstitution of mammalian RyR isoforms [12], [22], [23]. We here demonstrated that both α-RyR and β-RyR were expressed as full-length proteins and detected as discrete foci that were co-localized with the DHPR in the myotubes (Fig. 1). Both constructs formed functional Ca2+ release channels that were activated by caffeine (Fig. 3). Furthermore, α-RyR exhibited high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ release which is controlled by the endogenous DHPR (Fig. 2). This is not surprising, because the amino acid sequences of the channel forming α1S [36] and other auxiliary subunits (β1, α2/δ, andγ) (E. Suzuki and Y. Ogawa, GenBank accession No. AB043621–7) of bullfrog skeletal muscle DHPR are sufficiently homologous to those of the mammalian skeletal muscle counterparts that species differences should not have posed a problem. Thus, 1B5 myotubes provide a skeletal muscle context that is sufficient for proper function of frog α-RyR and β-RyR.

Differential Ca2+ release properties of two RyR isoforms

Our results indicate several functional differences in Ca2+ release properties between frog α-RyR and β-RyR. First, α-RyR but not β-RyR mediates high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ release, i.e., DICR (Fig. 2). This view is common to RyR homologues of other vertebrate skeletal muscles [12], [37], [38]. Second, the fashion of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release events is fundamentally different between the two isoforms: cells expressing α-RyR have uniform and sustained Ca2+ release in a graded manner, whereas cells expressing β-RyR have regenerative Ca2+ release events (Ca2+ oscillations and waves) in an all-or-none fashion (Fig. 3, ,4).4). These differences may be due to intrinsic Ca2+ release properties of the two RyR isoforms, but is not to secondary differences (e.g., [Ca2+]i or [Ca2+]SR) induced by expression of each isoform, because a combined phenotype of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release was observed when the two isoforms were co-expressed (Fig. 5). We have demonstrated previously that [3H]ryanodine binding of β-RyR is more than 20-fold higher than that of α-RyR in frog skeletal muscle SR, indicating greater CICR activity of β-RyR [20]. This might be partly responsible for occurrence of regenerative Ca2+ release events by β-RyR. Further studies would clarify the underlying mechanisms of these differences.

Ca2+ sparks are discrete and localized elevation of Ca2+ via the RyR channels [39], [40]. Based on the facts that Ca2+ sparks are readily detectable in frog muscle, but hardly detected in mammalian muscle [41], [42], it is hypothesized that β-RyR or RyR3 may produce the Ca2+ sparks. Instead, “ridge” and “ember”, a long-lasting events of steady amplitude, have also been detected in frog [43] and mammalian [44] skeletal muscles, which are believed to represent the Ca2+ release operated directly by voltage sensors. The regenerative and self-terminating fashion of Ca2+ release events by β-RyR is consistent with the properties of Ca2+ sparks, whereas the ember-type Ca2+ release could be explained by graded and sustained Ca2+ release by α-RyR.

Roles of two RyR isoforms in frog skeletal muscle

We demonstrated here that DICR is exclusively mediated by α-RyR. This clearly indicates that α-RyR is critical for E-C coupling in frog skeletal muscle. What is a role of β-RyR? It has been proposed that β-RyR might function as an amplifier of the Ca2+ signals by the CICR mechanism [33]. Contribution of CICR to physiological Ca2+ release in frog skeletal muscle, however, has been challenged by Endo [3], [45] and us [21], [46]. We here demonstrated that global Ca2+ transients induced by high [K+]o were not affected by co-expression of β-RyR (Fig. 5). In addition, procaine had no effect on high [K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients of myotubes co-expressing α-RyR and β-RyR (Fig. 6). Taken together, these findings suggest that CICR by β-RyR may make only a minor contribution to Ca2+ signals of DICR on membrane depolarization in 1B5 myotubes.

Recently, Pouvreau et al. [47] have expressed exogenous mammalian RyR3 in adult mouse skeletal muscle fibers by electroporation of its cDNA. They found that RyR3-transfected fibers exhibited abundant voltage-activated Ca2+ sparks that were not observed with non-transfected or RyR1-transfected fibers, suggesting the amplification of Ca2+ release by RyR3. Legrand et al. [48] conducted similar experiments where exogenous mammalian RyR3 was expressed, but the results were totally opposite of those found by Pouvreau: the RyR3-transfected fibers exhibited no voltage-activated Ca2+ sparks, although spontaneous Ca2+ release events were frequently observed. This is consistent with our conclusion that β-RyR makes only a minor contribution to DICR. The reason for the differences between the two studies remains unclear.

Luttgau and Oetliker [49] reported that the threshold concentration of caffeine contracture was 1–2 mM with adult frog skeletal muscle and that caffeine at 2–4 mM caused occasional oscillations of tension, although it gave rise to sustained contracture at 5 mM or higher. On the basis of our findings presented here (Fig. 3, 5),5), greater contribution of Ca2+ release through β-RyR than that through α-RyR would be a plausible explanation for tension oscillation in the presence of 2–4 mM caffeine. On the other hand, the characteristic disposition of α-RyR and β-RyR on the junctional face of the SR [15] might have to be kept in mind for interpretation of results with adult frog skeletal muscle. This arrangement may be critically important for effective activation of CICR of β-RyR [33]. In the present study we did not perform ultrastructural analysis of the arrangement of the two RyR isoforms in 1B5 myotubes. However, we demonstrated that each isoform was properly targeted to the junctions as clearly as the two studies of skeletal muscles expressing exogenous RyR3 showed [47], [48]. Further studies will be necessary to conclude the function and contribution of β-RyR to E-C coupling in frog skeletal muscle.

Differential effects of procaine on CICR and DICR

Procaine is a well-known inhibitor of CICR. Its effect on DICR, however, is controversial [34], [35], [50], [51]. The results presented here indicate that procaine has no or only weak effect on DICR under conditions free from inactivation of E-C coupling, but it inhibits DICR during the inactivated state. Thus results using procaine would depend on experimental conditions: method of stimulation or activation, the size or mass of biological specimen, the type of preparation, and experimental history.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results suggest that the two frog RyR isoforms provide distinct intracellular Ca2+ signals in 1B5 myotubes. These distinct properties may also occur in frog skeletal muscle and will be important for E-C coupling.

Supporting Information

Movie S1

Caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients of myotubes expressing α-RyR. Myotubes were stimulated by 10 mM caffeine. Images were captured at every 900 ms. The movie is 5 times faster in speed than real time.

(0.02 MB MOV)

Movie S2

[K+]o-induced Ca2+ transients of myotubes expressing α-RyR. Myotubes were stimulated by 80 mM [K+]o. Images were captured at every 300 ms. The movie is 5 times faster in speed than real time.

(0.05 MB MOV)

Movie S3

Caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients of myotubes expressing β-RyR. Myotubes were stimulated by 10 mM caffeine. Images were captured at every 900 ms. The movie is 5 times faster in speed than real time.

(0.04 MB MOV)

Acknowledgments

We thank N. Kurebayashi for valuable discussions, and Y. Wang and R. Hirsh for helping with HSV virus packaging and 1B5 cell culture.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Japan Society for Promotion of Science and National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 AR43140 (PDA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Ogawa Y. Role of ryanodine receptors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1994;29:229–274. [PubMed]
2. Franzini-Armstrong C, Protasi F. Ryanodine receptors of striated muscles: a complex channel capable of multiple interactions. Physiol Rev. 1997;77:699–729. [PubMed]
3. Endo M. Calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Physiol Rev. 1977;57:71–108. [PubMed]
4. Endo M. Calcium-induced calcium release in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:1153–1176. [PubMed]
5. Cheng H, Lederer M, Xiao R, Gómez A, Zhou Y, et al. Excitation-contraction coupling in heart: new insights from Ca2+ sparks. Cell Calcium. 1996;20:129–140. [PubMed]
6. Rios E, Pizarro G. Voltage sensor of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1991;71:849–908. [PubMed]
7. Schneider MF. Control of calcium release in functioning skeletal muscle Fibers. Annu Rev Physiol. 1994;56:463–484. [PubMed]
8. Sorrentino V, Reggiani C. Expression of the ryanodine receptor type 3 in skeletal muscle. A new partner in excitation-contraction coupling? Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1999;9:54–61. [PubMed]
9. Sorrentino V. The ryanodine receptor family of intracellular calcium release channels. Adv Pharmacol. 1995;33:67–90. [PubMed]
10. Takeshima H, Ikemoto T, Nishi M, Nishiyama N, Shimuta M, et al. Generation and characterization of mutant mice lacking ryanodine receptor type 3. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19649–19652. [PubMed]
11. Takeshima H, Iino M, Takekura H, Nishi M, Kuno J, et al. Excitation-contraction uncoupling and muscular degeneration in mice lacking functional skeletal muscle ryanodine-receptor gene. Nature. 1994;369:556–559. [PubMed]
12. Fessenden JD, Wang Y, Moore RA, Chen SR, Allen PD, et al. Divergent functional properties of ryanodine receptor types 1 and 3 expressed in a myogenic cell line. Biophys J. 2000;79:2509–2525. [PubMed]
13. Ogawa Y, Murayama T, Kurebayashi N. Ryanodine receptor isoforms of non-Mammalian skeletal muscle. Front Biosci. 2002;7:d1184–1194. [PubMed]
14. Sutko JL, Airey JA. Ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels: does diversity in form equal diversity in function? Physiol Rev. 1996;76:1027–1071. [PubMed]
15. Felder E, Franzini-Armstrong C. Type 3 ryanodine receptors of skeletal muscle are segregated in a parajunctional position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1695–1700. [PubMed]
16. Oyamada H, Murayama T, Takagi T, Iino M, Iwabe N, et al. Primary structure and distribution of ryanodine-binding protein isoforms of the bullfrog skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:17206–17214. [PubMed]
17. Ottini L, Marziali G, Conti A, Charlesworth A, Sorrentino V. Alpha and beta isoforms of ryanodine receptor from chicken skeletal muscle are the homologues of mammalian RyR1 and RyR3. Biochem J. 1996;315 (Pt 1):207–216. [PubMed]
18. Franck JP, Morrissette J, Keen JE, Londraville RL, Beamsley M, et al. Cloning and characterization of fiber type-specific ryanodine receptor isoforms in skeletal muscles of fish. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:C401–415. [PubMed]
19. O'Brien J, Meissner G, Block BA. The fastest contracting muscles of nonmammalian vertebrates express only one isoform of the ryanodine receptor. Biophys J. 1993;65:2418–2427. [PubMed]
20. Murayama T, Ogawa Y. Selectively suppressed Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release activity of alpha-ryanodine receptor (alpha-RyR) in frog skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum: potential distinct modes in Ca2+ release between alpha- and beta-RyR. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:2953–2960. [PubMed]
21. Murayama T, Ogawa Y. Roles of two ryanodine receptor isoforms coexisting in skeletal muscle. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002;12:305–311. [PubMed]
22. Moore RA, Nguyen H, Galceran J, Pessah IN, Allen PD. A transgenic myogenic cell line lacking ryanodine receptor protein for homologous expression studies: reconstitution of Ry1R protein and function. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:843–851. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Protasi F, Franzini-Armstrong C, Allen PD. Role of ryanodine receptors in the assembly of calcium release units in skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:831–842. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Wang Y, Fraefel C, Protasi F, Moore R, Fessenden J, et al. HSV-1 amplicon vectors are a highly efficient gene delivery system for skeletal muscle myoblasts and myotubes. Am J Physiol. 2000;278:C619–C626. [PubMed]
25. Chugun A, Taniguchi K, Murayama T, Uchide T, Hara Y, et al. Subcellular distribution of ryanodine receptors in the cardiac muscle of carp (Cyprinus carpio). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285:R601–609. [PubMed]
26. Airey JA, Beck CF, Murakami K, Tanksley SJ, Deerinck TJ, et al. Identification and localization of two triad junctional foot protein isoforms in mature avian fast twitch skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:14187–14194. [PubMed]
27. Kurebayashi N, Takeshima H, Nishi M, Murayama T, Suzuki E, et al. Changes in Ca2+ handling in adult MG29-deficient skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;310:1266–1272. [PubMed]
28. Hodgkin AL, Horowicz P. Potassium contractures in single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960;153:386–403. [PubMed]
29. Luttgau HC, Spiecker W. The effects of calcium deprivation upon mechanical and electrophysiological parameters in skeletal muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1979;296:411–429. [PubMed]
30. Chawla S, Skepper JN, Hockaday AR, Huang CL. Calcium waves induced by hypertonic solutions in intact frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 2001;536:351–359. [PubMed]
31. Cheng H, Lederer MR, Lederer WJ, Cannell MB. Calcium sparks and [Ca2+]i waves in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:C148–159. [PubMed]
32. Yang D, Pan Z, Takeshima H, Wu C, Nagaraj RY, et al. RyR3 amplifies RyR1-mediated Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in neonatal mammalian skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:40210–40214. [PubMed]
33. Rios E, Zhou J. Control of dual isoforms of Ca2+ release channels in muscle. Biol Res. 2004;37:583–591. [PubMed]
34. Heistracher P, Hunt CC. The effect of procaine on snake twitch muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969;201:627–638. [PubMed]
35. Thorens S, Endo M. Calcium-induced calcium release and ‘depolarisation’-induced calcium release: their physiological significance. Proc Jpn Acad. 1975;51:473–478.
36. Zhou J, Cribbs L, Yi J, Shirokov R, Perez-Reyes E, et al. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor from Rana catesbeiana. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25503–25509. [PubMed]
37. Takeshima H, Yamazawa T, Ikemoto T, Takekura H, Nishi M, et al. Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in myocytes from dyspedic mice lacking the type-1 ryanodine receptor. Embo J. 1995;14:2999–3006. [PubMed]
38. Airey JA, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Houenou LJ, Ivanenko A, et al. Crooked neck dwarf (cn) mutant chicken skeletal muscle cells in low density primary cultures fail to express normal alpha ryanodine receptor and exhibit a partial mutant phenotype. Dev Dyn. 1993;197:189–202. [PubMed]
39. Schneider MF. Ca2+ sparks in frog skeletal muscle: generation by one, some, or many SR Ca2+ release channels? J Gen Physiol. 1999;113:365–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Shirokova N, Gonzalez A, Kirsch WG, Rios E, Pizarro G, et al. Calcium sparks: release packets of uncertain origin and fundamental role. J Gen Physiol. 1999;113:377–384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Shirokova N, Garcia J, Rios E. Local calcium release in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1998;512 (Pt 2):377–384. [PubMed]
42. Conklin MW, Ahern CA, Vallejo P, Sorrentino V, Takeshima H, et al. Comparison of Ca2+ sparks produced independently by two ryanodine receptor isoforms (type 1 or type 3). Biophys J. 2000;78:1777–1785. [PubMed]
43. Gonzalez A, Kirsch WG, Shirokova N, Pizarro G, Stern MD, et al. The spark and its ember: separately gated local components of Ca2+ release in skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 2000;115:139–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Kirsch WG, Uttenweiler D, Fink RH. Spark- and ember-like elementary Ca2+ release events in skinned fibres of adult mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2001;537:379–389. [PubMed]
45. Endo M. The Mechanism of Gated Calcium Transport across Biological Membranes. New York: Academic Press; 1981. Mechanism of calcium-induced calcium release in the SR membrane. pp. 257–264.
46. Murayama T, Kurebayashi N, Ogawa Y. Role of Mg2+ in Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release through ryanodine receptors of frog skeletal muscle: modulations by adenine nucleotides and caffeine. Biophys J. 2000;78:1810–1824. [PubMed]
47. Pouvreau S, Royer L, Yi J, Brum G, Meissner G, et al. Ca2+ sparks operated by membrane depolarization require isoform 3 ryanodine receptor channels in skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5235–5240. [PubMed]
48. Legrand C, Giacomello E, Berthier C, Allard B, Sorrentino V, et al. Spontaneous and voltage-activated Ca2+ release in adult mouse skeletal muscle fibres expressing the type 3 ryanodine receptor. J Physiol. 2008;586:441–457. [PubMed]
49. Luttgau HC, Oetliker H. The action of caffeine on the activation of the contractile mechanism in straited muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1968;194:51–74. [PubMed]
50. Klein MG, Simon BJ, Schneider MF. Effects of procaine and caffeine on calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1992;453:341–366. [PubMed]
51. Brum G, Piriz N, DeArmas R, Rios E, Stern M, et al. Differential effects of voltage-dependent inactivation and local anesthetics on kinetic phases of Ca2+ release in frog skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 2003;85:245–254. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science