PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Psychosomatics. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 12, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2902246
NIHMSID: NIHMS206794
Cancer-Related Fatigue and Its Associations with Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review
Linda F. Brown and Kurt Kroenke
Linda F. Brown, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis;
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Linda F. Brown, Psychology Department, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 North Blackford Street, LD 124, Indianapolis, IN 46202
Background
Fatigue is an important symptom in cancer and has been shown to be associated with psychological distress.
Objectives
This review assesses evidence regarding associations of CRF with depression and anxiety.
Methods
Database searches yielded 59 studies reporting correlation coefficients or odds ratios.
Results
Combined sample size was 12,103. Average correlation of fatigue with depression, weighted by sample size, was 0.56 and for anxiety, 0.46. Thirty-one instruments were used to assess fatigue, suggesting a lack of consensus on measurement.
Conclusion
This review confirms the association of fatigue with depression and anxiety. Directionality needs to be better delineated in longitudinal studies.
Keywords: cancer, fatigue, depression, anxiety
Fatigue is a pervasive and vexing problem in individuals with cancer. It adds considerably to suffering and exists across all types and stages of the disease. It has been found to be a problem before, during, and after treatment, sometimes continuing long after treatment has ended, even in those believed to be disease-free (1). Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has been reported by up to 40% of patients at diagnosis, 90% of patients treated with radiation and 80% of those under chemotherapy treatment (1). In research in patients with advanced cancer, fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms (25). In view of its prevalence and detrimental impact on quality of life, fatigue is an important symptom to target in the treatment of cancer survivors.
New Focus on Understanding CRF
The mechanisms of CRF are not well understood, but it is known to occur both as a consequence of the cancer itself and as a side effect of treatment (1). Until recently, CRF was infrequently discussed or treated, partly because of focus on other symptoms such as pain, nausea, and vomiting, and partly because fatigue was considered an unavoidable symptom to be endured rather than treated (2). Fortunately, fatigue has recently caught the attention of cancer researchers who are seeking to better understand its nature in order to develop efficacious interventions. A recent state-of-the-science statement from the National Institute of Health (NIH) called for more efforts toward symptom management in cancer, with fatigue named specifically along with pain and depression as the symptoms needing attention (6). Based on a panel’s evaluation of available evidence, the report called for prospective research focused on the definition, occurrence, assessment, and treatment of these three cancer symptoms and their interrelationships.
Two of the three symptoms in the NIH call to action—fatigue and depression—are a focus of this review, along with anxiety. Their interrelationships in cancer patients are of special interest. Psychological symptoms—especially depression and to a lesser degree anxiety—have been found to have relatively high correlations with CRF. In fact, depression’s relationship to fatigue has been shown to be of greater magnitude than that of disease activity as measured by such markers as nutritional status and tumor-specific tests (7). Understanding the nature of these relationships, however, has proven elusive. Does a cancer patient become depressed and/or anxious because of the effects of being fatigued or might it be the reverse? Alternatively, is there a bidirectional relationship between the two symptoms, with each having an influence on the other? Are there external factors that independently cause both fatigue and depression and/or anxiety? Also, does the relationship of CRF with depression and anxiety differ by type and stage of cancer, by type of cancer treatment, or by differences within the individual person?
Measurement Issues
Measurement is an important issue, particularly the ability to distinguish fatigue from depression. Both fatigue and depression are heterogeneous constructs with physical, cognitive, and emotional dimensions and a high degree of overlap across the dimensions. For example, “fatigue or loss of energy nearly every day” is one of the core symptoms used in establishing a clinical diagnosis of depression (8, p. 356). Both constructs can be assessed as a single symptom, a cluster of symptoms, or as a clinical syndrome (9). Both are measured primarily by self report. Cancer patients often endorse items that could be interpreted as suggesting high levels of fatigue, high levels of depression, or both. A recent review found 26 different scales that had been used to assess CRF, some of which were developed specifically for cancer fatigue and some of which were non-specific to cancer (10).
The discriminant validity of the existing measures has been called into question by the generally high positive correlations found on continuous measures of fatigue and depression administered together (11). However, some studies have found that the correlation of fatigue and depression remains high even after removing the fatigue items from depression measures(12 -14). Furthermore, fatigue measures correlate rather strongly with measures that assess just the mood aspects of depression (15). Some have suggested that the overlap problem may be addressed by use of a single-item measure in which patients are asked to rate fatigue experience on a 1-to-10 scale, such as “to what degree have you experienced fatigue during the past week?” (10). Others have proposed that CRF is best measured as a syndrome, using a set of diagnostic criteria. Such a set has been proposed for future inclusion in the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition. To meet criteria, a cancer survivor must experience at least 6 of 11 symptoms and meet three other requirements, one of which is that the symptoms are not related to a comorbid condition such as major depression (16). Because measurement issues may confound attempts to understand the relationship between CRF and psychological variables, we include it as a secondary topic in this review.
Purposes of the Present Review
In undertaking this review, we expected to find a recent increase in the number of studies examining associations between CRF and depression and anxiety, and we expected to find consistently significant correlations. Although the association between CRF and depression has been previously reviewed (15, 1719), our current paper provides several important contributions to the literature. First, the inclusion of new studies substantially expands the number of studies evaluated. Second, it is the first systematic review of studies reporting associations between CRF and anxiety. Third, special attention is directed to methods of measurement in the effort to distinguish CRF from depression. Fourth, longitudinal studies are highlighted in order to explore potential causal relationships between CRF, depression, and anxiety.
Literature Search and Study Selection
Medline and PsychInfo databases were searched using keywords or descriptors FATIGUE and CANCER or NEOPLASMS and ANXIETY or DEPRESSION. The search was limited to English language journal articles or chapters. No date limits were imposed; the Medline database included articles from 1950 to 2007 and PsychInfo covered from 1806 to 2007. These searches yielded 160hits in Medline and 113 in PyschInfo. Each abstract was reviewed and articles were considered for inclusion if the cancer sample size was at least 25, provided that fatigue was mentioned as a primary outcome in either the title or the abstract. The selected articles were further reviewed to identify those that provided correlation or odds ratio statistics for fatigue and its association with depression, anxiety, or both. All original research articles that met these criteria were included. Articles were added that did not emerge from the database search but were located by reviewing reference lists of retrieved articles.
Data were abstracted on the following key variables: sample size; type and stage of cancer; control group if there was one; treatment status; and specific measures of fatigue, depression, and anxiety used. The correlation of fatigue with depression and/or anxiety was the primary outcome extracted from each paper.
Data Analysis
Average untransformed correlation coefficients weighted by sample size have been suggested as the preferred summary statistic in reviews of correlational studies (20). Weighted average correlations of fatigue with depression and with anxiety were computed by multiplying the sample size by the appropriate correlation coefficient for each study and dividing the sum of the products of all studies by the total sample size across all studies. For longitudinal studies reporting correlations at multiple time points, the average of the reported correlation coefficients was entered into the analysis. Confidence intervals (95%) were calculated using Fisher’s z transformation. Coefficients of determination were calculated for the summary statistics. A calculation of r2 provides the coefficient of determination, which suggests the proportion of variance in a construct that is accounted for by its associated variable. Average odds ratios weighted by sample size were calculated separately.
Fifty-nine articles were ultimately included, the earliest of which was published in 1989 (4, 5, 12, 13, 2166)(14, 6774). The majority of studies (n = 52) have been published in the last decade (1998 to 2007), indicating a marked increase in research interest in fatigue and its association with psychological variables. Fifteen of the studies had scale validation as a primary objective. The individual studies and key findings are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
Summary of Studies Examining the Relationship of Cancer-Related Fatigue with Depression and Anxiety
Study Characteristics
The total number of subjects from all studies was 12,103. Twenty-three (39%) of the studies were longitudinal, and 12 included a control or comparison group, which in most cases were individuals with no cancer history. Most studies reported correlation coefficients; five reported odds ratios. Twenty-one studies focused on a breast cancer sample, 4 on lung cancer patients, 4 on hematological disease, 2 on prostate cancer, 1 on testicular cancer, and 4 on a mix of specific cancers. The remaining 23 studies included patients with any cancer type. Studies in which treatment status was specified most commonly focused on the post-treatment period (13 studies). Ten studies included only participants who were disease-free after treatment, and 3 looked at patients characterized as “long-term survivors,” ranging from at least 1-year post-diagnosis to 10-years and beyond. Six studies focused on advanced cancer patients; three on persons in palliative care. Study attributes are presented in Table 2.
Table 2
Table 2
Characteristics of Study Samples
Fatigue and Depression
Depression was significantly associated with fatigue in every study in which the correlation was reported except one, and in some cases the magnitude was strong. The range of correlation coefficients was 0.16 to 0.84. The average correlation between fatigue and depression, weighted by sample size, was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.58) across the 51 studies reporting this statistic (see Table 3). The unweighted average was 0.57. A calculation of the coefficient of determination (r2) suggests that fatigue shared approximately 31% of its variance with depression. It should be noted that 31 different scales were used to measure fatigue, potentially contributing to some of the variation across studies. For the three studies reporting odds ratios, the weighted average association of fatigue with depression was 1.16.
Table 3
Table 3
Mean associations with CRF across studies, weighted by sample size
Fatigue and Anxiety
Anxiety was significantly correlated to fatigue in 33 of the 35 studies reporting the association, although the magnitude was not as great as for depression. The range of correlation coefficients was 0.16 to 0.73. The weighted average was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.49), and the unweighted average was 0.49. The coefficient of determination weighted by sample size indicated that fatigue shared about 23% of its variance with anxiety across all the studies. The weighted mean for the two studies reporting odds ratios was 1.19.
Measurement Issues
A lack of consensus about the best way to measure fatigue in cancer research is evident by the fact that 31 different instruments were used to assess fatigue in the 59 studies. No single scale emerged as a clear favorite. The instrument used most frequently, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, was used in only 9 studies. In contrast, two scales predominated for measuring depression—a subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)(75) was used in 24 studies, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)(76) was used in 14. Altogether, 12 depression scales were used across all studies. The HADS was also the favored instrument to measure anxiety, serving that purpose in 21 studies. Six different scales for anxiety were used across all studies. Table 4 provides details about the measures used in the 59 reviewed studies. Further information about most CRF scales, including reliability and validity data, can be found in a review by Wu and McSweeney (77).
Table 4
Table 4
Measurement Scales Used
A few investigators took steps to reduce potential measurement overlap in order to enhance discrimination between fatigue and depression. For example, two groups of researchers who chose the CES-D described its advantage of focusing on cognitive and affective symptoms of depression rather than physical symptoms, minimizing overlap with fatigue items (28, 53). Visser and Smets (72) dropped 6 items of the CES-D that measured somatic symptoms to avoid construct overlap in their analysis and nevertheless found significant correlations between fatigue and depression (range of 0.35 to 0.48 across 3 timepoints).
Some felt that an advantage of the HADS is that its depression subscale does not include any physical symptoms such as lack of energy or sleep disturbance, thereby reducing potential contamination of the relationship with a measure of fatigue (12, 38, 40). Yet item 8 of the HADS-D, “I feel as if I am slowed down,” can be deemed as similar to fatigue and was therefore dropped from the analyses of correlation with fatigue in 5 studies (1214, 66, 70). Four of these 5 studies still found significant correlations between fatigue and depression ranging from 0.46 to 0.70, with only 1 study showing a nonsignficant relationship.(70)
The Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) is another instrument that was modified to minimize overlap with fatigue measures. Passik and colleagues (31) used an abbreviated version in which 9 of 20 items were dropped because the somatic nature of the items could lead to confounding of cancer and its treatment. In another study, 3 of the 20 items were excluded because of concern the items reflected somatic symptoms of fatigue (34). Relatively high correlations of fatigue with depression were nevertheless found. Kirsh and colleagues (56) singled out an item of the SDS, “I get tired for no reason” and tested its utility as a single-item measure of CRF. They found the item to have a relatively high correlation with both the SDS (r = 0.63) and their fatigue measure (r= −.070).
Longitudinal studies
The average weighted correlation coefficients of fatigue with depression and anxiety in longitudinal studies were not significantly different compared to those statistics across all 59 studies. Of the 23 studies that were longitudinal, 15 investigated associations between fatigue and depression or anxiety at multiple time points. Of these 15 studies, 5 examined patients undergoing radiation therapy; 4 had a sample of patients receiving chemotherapy, 2 were during stem cell transplant, 1 during hormone therapy, 1 during treatment in leukemia patients, and 2 sampled cancer patients post-treatment. We examined these studies to see if patterns could be detected relative to the directional relationships between fatigue, depression and anxiety. Overall, no such pattern emerged, partly due to heterogeneity of the samples between studies and partly due to inconclusive or contradictory findings. In only 2 studies did the authors clearly assert that their findings suggest that changes in fatigue were associated with changes in depression and anxiety (13, 25). Authors of at least 4 studies concluded that no evidence of relationships in longitudinal changes had been found—2 referring to depression only (68, 72), and 2 assessing both depression and anxiety (14, 50). Authors of the remaining studies reported findings that were relatively ambiguous on this matter.
Depression is consistently moderately associated with CRF. Anxiety is also an important correlate, though at a somewhat lower magnitude than depression. Taking into account the complex and multifactorial nature of fatigue, even moderate associations are impressive. These findings support the conclusions of previous reviews of psychological correlates of CRF(15, 1719). Moreover, our systematic review included 59 studies which is nearly double that of the largest previous review of 30 studies (18). The heterogeneity of the 59 studies, however, precludes specific conclusions about the directionality or mechanisms underlying the relationships among fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, data on these constructs are inherently subjective and subject to recall bias, further limiting the potential for conclusive findings.
The consistent correlation between depression and CRF has raised questions about a common etiology. Jacobsen and Weitzner (15) discuss three possible causal relationships: that fatigue causes the cancer patient to become depressed; that cancer patients may become fatigued because they are depressed; or a third factor may cause both depression and fatigue. Although the authors cited some supporting evidence for each of these possibilities, their findings were inconclusive. Depression is a predisposing factor for the development of chronic fatigue syndrome (78, 79), but CRF may have different mechanisms. Some studies suggest that fatigue and depression are independent conditions in cancer patients with patterns that differ over the disease course (72, 78). The subset of longitudinal studies in this review assessing fatigue, depression and/or anxiety at several time points provides additional support for an interdependence among these symptoms, though the mixed findings still do not provide definitive evidence for whether fatigue is a consequence of these psychological factors, a cause, or the product of a common pathway. The development of CRF may involve several physiological, biochemical, and psychological systems (79) which in turn may vary by type of cancer, stage of disease, and type of treatment.
Further research with robust measures administered at multiple time points and more sophisticated statistical analyses such as times series or structural equation modeling might be informative. Also, translational research examining biological or physiological measures (e.g., cytokines, neuroimaging, etc.) might disclose both shared as well as disparate mechanisms underlying fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Control groups of noncancer populations (including healthy individuals), of individuals with fatigue or depression/anxiety only, or of patients with comorbid medical illnesses might further enrich our understanding of the fatigue-depression-anxiety relationship.
Intervention studies aimed at improving outcome variables that are correlated with CRF may also be helpful in teasing apart the interrelationships (7). For example, an intervention that improves cancer-related depression could be evaluated in terms of its concomitant effect on fatigue. Conversely, interventions targeting fatigue could be analyzed for effects on depression and anxiety. Along those lines, Tchekmedyian and colleagues (2003) found that improvements in fatigue in 250 lung cancer patients receiving darbepoetin alfa for treatment of anemia were associated with parallel reductions in depression and anxiety. In this type of research, it is critical to include elevated fatigue levels as an inclusion criterion.
Fewer studies have explored the relationship between anxiety and CRF and have often done so as an adjunct to investigating depression’s associations with CRF. In many studies that included both variables, depression and anxiety scores were reported as if operating as a cluster. A few studies found CRF associations that were specific to anxiety, however, such as the correlation of trait anxiety with CRF and the effects of baseline anxiety on later fatigue, depression or anxiety (38, 39, 44, 49, 51, 55). Moreover, our pooled results suggest anxiety is consistently associated with CRF. Thus, anxiety warrants inclusion as an important psychological variable in future CRF research.
The measurement challenges already described demand careful attention in future studies. The wide variety of measures that have been used to measure fatigue has been problematic. Research in this domain will benefit if the field of fatigue instruments is narrowed to a few that have been well-validated to accurately assess CRF and distinguish it from depression. Latent variable path analysis may be particularly useful in future research. In longitudinal studies, this structural equation modeling technique can support or disconfirm a priori hypotheses about directionality of causal effects The procedure may reduce effects of measurement error by assessing multiple indicators of study constructs within a single analysis (80).
In conclusion, cancer-related fatigue is an important and highly prevalent symptom that negatively affects cancer patient’s quality of life and therefore should be a high priority for treatment. Depression and anxiety are prominent among the correlates of CRF; however, the nature and direction of causality among these variables remains uncertain, despite a recent increase in research interest in this area. More longitudinal and/or intervention studies would be desirable, as well as a more uniform use of measures across multiple studies. Meanwhile, clinicians should screen for and treat the comorbid depression and anxiety that commonly accompany cancer-related fatigue.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript was partially supported by National Cancer Institute grant R25 CA 117865-01A11
Contributor Information
Linda F. Brown, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.
Kurt Kroenke, Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute.
1. Hofman M, Ryan JL, Figueroa-Moseley CD, Jean-Pierre P, Morrow GR. Cancer-related fatigue: The scale of the problem. The Oncologist. 2007;12:4–10. [PubMed]
2. Higginson IJ, Armes J, Krishnasamy M. Introduction. In: Armes J, Krishnasamy M, Higginson I, editors. Fatigue in Cancer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. xvii–xxii.
3. Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D, Groopman JE, Horning SJ, Itri LM, Johnson DH, Miaskowski C, Scherr SL, Portenoy RK, Vogelzang NJ. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: New findings from the Fatigue Coalition. The Oncologist. 2000;5:353–60. [PubMed]
4. Chan CWH, Richardson A, Richardson J. A study to assess the existence of the symptom cluster of breathlessness, fatigue, and anxiety in patients with advanced lung cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2005;9:325–33. [PubMed]
5. Respini D, Jacobsen PB, Thors C, Tralongo P, Balducci L. The prevalence and correlates of fatigue in older cancer patients. Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology. 2003;47:273–9. [PubMed]
6. Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue. NIH Consensus Statements, State-of-the-Science Statements. 2002;19:1–29. [PubMed]
7. Hotopf M. Definitions, epidemiology, and models of fatigue in the general population and in cancer. In: Armes J, Krishnasamy M, Higgenson I, editors. Fatigue in Cancer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 3–27.
8. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Press; 2000.
9. Arnold LM. Understanding fatigue in major depressive disorder and other medical disorders. Psychosomatics. 2008;49:185–90. [PubMed]
10. Jean-Pierre P, Figueroa-Moseley CD, Kohli S, Fiscella K, Palesh OG, Morrow GR. Assessment of cancer-related fatigue: Implications for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The Oncologist. 2007;12:11–21. [PubMed]
11. Jacobsen PB. Assessment of fatigue in cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 2004;32:93–7. [PubMed]
12. Smets EMA, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JCJM. Applications of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. British Journal of Cancer. 1996;73:241–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Stone P, Richards M, A’Hern R, Hardy J. Fatigue in patients with cancers of the breast or prostate undergoing radical radiotherapy. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2001;22:1007–15. [PubMed]
14. Stone P, Hardy J, Huddart RAAH, Richards M. Fatigue in patients with prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy. European Journal of Cancer. 2000;36:1134–41. [PubMed]
15. Jacobsen PB, Weitzner M. Fatigue and depression in cancer patients: conceptual and clinical issues. In: Armes J, Krishnasamy M, Higginson I, editors. Fatigue in Cancer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 223–41.
16. Cella D, Davis K, Breitbart W, Curt GA. Cancer-related fatigue: Prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001;19:3385–91. [PubMed]
17. Donovan KA, Jacobsen PB. Fatigue, depression, and insomnia: Evidence for a symptom cluster in cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 2007;23:127–35. [PubMed]
18. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Weitzner M. Distinguishing fatigue and depression in patients with cancer. Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry. 2003;8:229–40. [PubMed]
19. Servaes P, Verhagen C, Bleijenberg G. Fatigue in cancer patients during and after treatment: Prevalence, correlates, and interventions. European Journal of Cancer. 2002;38:27–43. [PubMed]
20. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of Meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
21. Hann DM, Denniston MM, Baker F. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: Further validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Quality of Life Research. 2000;9:847–54. [PubMed]
22. Blesch KS, Paice JA, Wickham R, Harte N, Schnoor DK, Purl S, Rehwalt M, Kopp PL, Manson S, Coveny SB, McHale M, Cahill M. Correlates of fatigue in people with breast or lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1991;18:81–7. [PubMed]
23. Young KE, White CA. The prevalence and moderators of fatigue in people who have been successfully treated for cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2006;60:29–38. [PubMed]
24. Tsai L-Y, Li I-F, Lai Y-H, Liu C-P, Chang T-Y, Tu C-T. Fatigue and its associated factors in hospice cancer patients in Taiwan. Cancer Nursing. 2007;30:24–30. [PubMed]
25. Tchekmedyian NS, Kallich J, McDermott A, Fayers P, Erder MH. The relationship between psychologic distress and cancer-related fatigue. Cancer. 2003;98:198–203. [PubMed]
26. Sugawara Y, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Matsuoka Y, Nakano T, Inagaki M, Imoto S, Fujimori M, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y. Occurence of fatigue and associated factors in disease-free breast cancer patients without depression. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13:628–36. [PubMed]
27. Servaes P, Gielisson MFM, Verhagen S, Bleijenberg G. The course of severe fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients: A longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16:787–95. [PubMed]
28. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Bushunow P, Matteson S, Rakita D, Andrews PLR. Temporal interrelationships among fatigue circadian rhythm and depression in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2002;10:329–36. [PubMed]
29. Reuter K, Classen CC, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Kirshner RR, Flynn PJ, Shedlock K, Spiegel D. Association of coping style, pain, age, and depression with fatigue in women with primary breast cancer. Psycho-oncology. 2006;15:772–9. [PubMed]
30. Prieto JM, Blanch J, Atala J, Carreras E, Rovira M, Cirera E, Gasto C. Clinical factors associated with fatigue in haematologic cancer patients receiving stem-cell transplantation. European Journal of Cancer. 2006;42:1749–55. [PubMed]
31. Passik SD, Kirsh KL, Donaghy K, Holtsclaw E, Theobald D, Cella D, Breitbart W. Patient-related barriers to fatigue communication: Initial validation of the Fatigue Management Barriers Questionnaire. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2002;24:481–93. [PubMed]
32. Munch TN, Stromgren AS, Pedersen L, Petersen MA, Hoermann L, Groenvold M. Multidimensional measurement of fatigue in advanced cancer patients in palliative care: An application of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006;31:533–41. [PubMed]
33. Kim Y, Hickok J, Morrow G. Fatigue and depresson in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: An emotion approach. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006;32:311–21. [PubMed]
34. Hwang SS, Chang VT, Rue M, Kasimis B. Multidimensional Independent Predictors of Cancer-Related Fatigue. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2003;26:604–14. [PubMed]
35. Haghighat S, Akbari ME, Holakouei K, Rahimi A, Montazeri A. Factors predicting fatigue in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:533–8. [PubMed]
36. Geinitz H, Zimmerman FB, Thamm R, Keller M, busch R, Molls M. Fatigue in patients with adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer: long-term follow-up. Journal of Cancer Research in Clinical Oncology. 2004;130:327–33. [PubMed]
37. Fox SW, Lyon DE. Symptom clusters and quality of life in survivors of lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2006;33:931–6. [PubMed]
38. Fossa SD, Dahl AA, Loge JH. Fatigue, anxiety, and depression in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:1249–54. [PubMed]
39. Fleer J, Sleijfer DT, Hoekstra HL, Tuinman MA, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Prevalence, changes in, and correlates of fatigue in the first year after diagnosis of testicular cancer. Anticancer Research. 2005;25:4647–54. [PubMed]
40. Fillion L, Gelinas C, Simard S, Savard J, Gagnon P. Validation evidence for the French Canadian adaptation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory as a measure of cancer-related fatigue. Cancer Nursing. 2003;26:143–54. [PubMed]
41. Fernandes R, Stone P, Andrews P, Morgan R, Sharma S. Comparison Between Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Circadian Rhythm in Cancer Inpatients and Healthy Volunteers: Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria for Cancer-Related Fatigue. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006;32:245–54. [PubMed]
42. Dimeo F, Schmittle A, Fietz T, Schwartz S, Kohler P, Boning D, Thiel E. Physical performance, depression, immune status and fatigue in patients with hematological malignancies after treatment. Annals of Oncology. 2004;15:1237–42. [PubMed]
43. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Bernaards C, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in long-term breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer. 2006;106:751–8. [PubMed]
44. Byar KL, Berger AM, Bakken SL, Cetak MA. Impact of adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy on fatigue, other symptoms, and quality of life. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2006;33:E18–E26. [PubMed]
45. Andrykowski MA, Curren SL, Lightner R. Off-treatment fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A controlled comparison. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1998;21:1–18. [PubMed]
46. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: Occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18:743–53. [PubMed]
47. Bruera E, Brenneis C, Michaud M, Rafter J, Magnan A, Tennant A, Hanson J, Macdonald RN. Association between asthenia and nutritional status, lean body mass, anemia, psychological status, and tumor mass in patients with advanced breast cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1989;4:59–63. [PubMed]
48. Dimeo F, Stieglitz R-D, Novelli-Fischer U, Fetscher S, Mertelsmann R, Keul J. Correlation between physical performance and fatigue in cancer patients. Annals of Oncology. 1997;8:1251–5. [PubMed]
49. Gaston-Johansson F, Fall-Dickson J, Nandy J, Ohly K, Stillman S, Krumm S, Kennedy MJ. The effectiveness of the Comprehensive Coping Strategy Program on clinical outcomes in breast cancer autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Nursing. 2000;23:277–85. [PubMed]
50. Geinitz H, Zimmerman FB, Stoll P, Thamm R, Kaffenberger W, Ansorg K, Keller M, Busch R, Van Beuningen D, Molls M. Fatigue serum cytokine levels and blood cell counts during radiotherapy of patients with breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology. 2001;51:691–8. [PubMed]
51. Geiser F, Hahn C, Conrad R, Liedtke R, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf I, Glasmacher A. Interaction of psychological factors and the effect of epoetin alfa treatment in cancer patients on hemoglobin and fatigue. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:273–8. [PubMed]
52. Glaus A. Fatigue in patients with cancer: Analysis and Assessment. Berlin: Springer; 1998. Construction of a new fatigue assessment questionnaire; pp. 54–76.
53. Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Martin SC, Kronish LE, Azzarello LM, Fields KK. Fatigue in women treated with bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: a comparison with women with no history of cancer. Support Care Cancer. 1997;5:44–52. [PubMed]
54. Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, Martin SC, Curran SL, Fields KK, Greenberg H, Lyman G. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Quality of Life Research. 1998:301–10. [PubMed]
55. Hann DM, Garovoy N, Finkelstein B, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, Fields KK. Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: A longitudinal comparative study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1999;17:311–19. [PubMed]
56. Kirsh KL, Passik S, Holtsclaw E, Donaghy K, Theobald D. I get tired for no reason: A single item screening for cancer-related fatigue. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2001;22:931–7. [PubMed]
57. Loge JH, Abrahamsen AF, Ekeberg O, Kaasa S. Fatigue and psychiatric morbidity among Hodgkin’s disease survivors. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2000;19:91–9. [PubMed]
58. Mock V, Dow KH, Meares CJ, Grimm PM, Dienemann JA, Haisfield-Wolfe ME, Quitasol W, Mitchell S, Chakravarthy A, Gage I. Effects of exercise on fatigue, physical functioning, and emotional distress during radiation therapy for breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1997;24:991–1000. [PubMed]
59. Morant R. Asthenia: An important symptom in cancer patients. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 1996;22:117–22. [PubMed]
60. Okuyama T, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Imoto S, Nakano T, Mikami I, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y. Factors correlated with fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients: Application of the Cancer Fatigue Scale. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8:215–22. [PubMed]
61. Okuyama T, Tanaka K, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Nishiwaki Y, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y. Fatigue in ambulatory patients with advanced lung cancer: Prevalence, correlated factors, and screening. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2001;22:554–64. [PubMed]
62. Redeker NS, Lev EL, Ruggiero J. Insomnia, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Scholarly inquiry for nursing practice. 2000;14:275–90. [PubMed]
63. Schneider RA. Concurrent validity of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 in assessing fatigue among cancer patients. Psychological Reports. 1998;82:883–6. [PubMed]
64. Smets EMA, Visser MRM, Willems-Groot AFMN, Garssen B, Oldenburger F, van Tienhoven G, de Haes JCJM. Fatigue and radiotherapy: (A) Experience in patients undergoing treatment. British Journal of Cancer. 1998;78:899–906. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Smets EMA, Visser MRM, Willems-Groot AFMN, Garssen B, Schuster-Uitterhoeve ALJ, de Haes JCJM. Fatigue and radiotherapy: (B) Experience in patients 9 months following treatment. British Journal of Cancer. 1998;78:907–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Stone P, Richards M, A’Hern R, Hardy J. A study to investigate the prevalence, severity, and correlates of fatigue among patients with cancer in comparison with a control group of volunteers without cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2000;11:561–7. [PubMed]
67. Meek PM, Nail LM, Barsevick AM, Schwartz AL, Stephen S, Whitmer K, Beck SL, Jones LS, Walker BL. Psychometric testing of fatigue instruments for use with cancer patients. Nursing Research. 2000;49:181–90. [PubMed]
68. Schumacher A, Wewers D, Heinecke A, Sauerland C, Koch OM, van de Loo J, Buchner T, Berdel WE. Fatigue as an important aspect of quality of life in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia Research. 2002;26:355–62. [PubMed]
69. Servaes P, van der Werf S, Prins J, Verhagen S, Bleijenberg G. Fatigue in disease-free cancer patients compared with fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Support Care Cancer. 2000;9:11–7. [PubMed]
70. Stone P, Hardy J, Broadley K, Tookman AJ, Kurowska A, Hern RA. Fatigue in advanced cancer: A prospective controlled cross-sectional study. British Journal of Cancer. 1999;79:1479–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Stein KD, Martin SC, Hann DM, Jacobsen PB. A mulitdimensional measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients. Cancer Practice. 1998;6:143–52. [PubMed]
72. Visser MRM, Smets EMA. Fatigue, depression and quality of life in cancer patients: how are they related? Support Care Cancer. 1998;6:101–8. [PubMed]
73. Wu H-S, Wurwich KW, McSweeney M. Assessing fatigue in persons with cancer: Further validation of the Wu Cancer Fatigue Scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006;32:255–65. [PubMed]
74. Okuyama T, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Hitoshi O, Shima Y, Maruguchi M, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y. Development and validation of the cancer fatigue scale: A brief, three-dimensional self-rating scale for assessment of fatigue in cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2000;19:5–14. [PubMed]
75. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67:361–70. [PubMed]
76. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401.
77. Wu H-S, McSweeney M. The assessment and measurement of fatigue in people with cancer. In: Armes J, Krishnasamy M, Higgenson I, editors. Fatigue in Cancer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 193–221.
78. Andrews P, Morrow GR, Hickok J, Roscoe JA, Stone P. Mechanisms and models of fatigue associated with cancer and its treatment: evidence from preclinical and clinical studies. In: Armes J, Krishnasamy M, Higgenson I, editors. Fatigue in Cancer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 51–87.
79. Ryan JL, Carroll JK, Ryan EP, Mustian KM, Fiscella K, Morrow GR. Mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. The Oncologist. 2007;12:22–34. [PubMed]
80. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.