Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(7): e11512.
Published online 2010 July 9. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0011512
PMCID: PMC2901390

Sphingosine Kinase-1 Is Required for Toll Mediated β-Defensin 2 Induction in Human Oral Keratinocytes

Roberto F. Speck, Editor



Host defense against invading pathogens is triggered by various receptors including toll-like receptors (TLRs). Activation of TLRs is a pivotal step in the initiation of innate, inflammatory, and antimicrobial defense mechanisms. Human β-defensin 2 (HBD-2) is a cationic antimicrobial peptide secreted upon Gram-negative bacterial perturbation in many cells. Stimulation of various TLRs has been shown to induce HBD-2 in oral keratinocytes, yet the underlying cellular mechanisms of this induction are poorly understood.

Principal Findings

Here we demonstrate that HBD-2 induction is mediated by the Sphingosine kinase-1 (Sphk-1) and augmented by the inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β (GSK-3β) via the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) dependent pathway. HBD-2 secretion was dose dependently inhibited by a pharmacological inhibitor of Sphk-1. Interestingly, inhibition of GSK-3β by SB 216763 or by RNA interference, augmented HBD-2 induction. Overexpression of Sphk-1 with concomitant inhibition of GSK-3β enhanced the induction of β-defensin-2 in oral keratinocytes. Ectopic expression of constitutively active GSK-3β (S9A) abrogated HBD-2 whereas kinase inactive GSK-3β (R85A) induced higher amounts of HBD-2.


These data implicate Sphk-1 in HBD-2 regulation in oral keratinocytes which also involves the activation of PI3K, AKT, GSK-3β and ERK 1/2. Thus we reveal the intricate relationship and pathways of toll-signaling molecules regulating HBD-2 which may have therapeutic potential.


Infection caused by sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in the United States [1], [2], [3]. Controlling inflammation from bacterial sepsis remains a challenge and antimicrobial peptides may have therapeutic utility [4]. Antimicrobial peptides, predominantly produced by epithelial linings, have shown broad spectrum activity against bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites [5]. Defensins are potent cationic antimicrobial peptides present in mammals and insects [6], [7], [8], [9] consisting of two classes based on their structural characteristics, namely, α-defensins and β-defensins. Human α-defensins are found in granules of phagocytes and Paneth cells, whereas human β-defensins 2 (HBD-2) are highly expressed by epithelial cells [10], [11], [12]. Epithelial cells are a first line of defense against bacterial attack and thus understanding defensin induction mechanisms in these cells is crucial.

Sphingosine kinase-1 (Sphk-1) is an important intracellular enzyme that catalyzes a novel lipid messenger Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) which regulates cellular proliferation and survival and histone acetylation [13], [14], [15] and activation implicated in cardio protection [16], [17], [18]. S1P is also a ligand for EDG1 (endothelial differentiation gene 1) receptor that regulates diverse cellular function [19]. Sphk-1 has been shown to regulate the MAPK signaling pathway and activates NF-kβ [20], and is highly expressed in various types of cancers [14] presumably associated with tumor angiogenesis. Recently, S1P has been shown to induce antimicrobial activity with both in vitro and in vivo animal infection models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis [21], [22], [23]. In the present investigation, we identified the involvement of Sphk-1 in the induction of β-defensin 2 in human gingival epithelial cells (HGECs) and also found that the inhibition of kinase glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3-β) augments HBD-2, all of which may have therapeutic application.


Ethics statement

Gingival tissue biopsies were obtained with written informed consent from periodontally healthy patients undergoing crown-lengthening procedures at the University of Louisville's School of Dentistry with an Institutional Review Board approval. The gingiva was treated with 0.025% trypsin and 0.01% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid overnight at 4°C and HGECs were isolated as previously described [24].


The cell culture medium was purchased from Invitrogen, CA. toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists namely, heat inactivated P. gingivalis was prepared as previously described [24], FSL-1 (Pam2CGDPKHPKSF), Pam3CSK4, P. gingivalis LPS, E. Coli LPS, ssRNA, Poly I:C, ODN 2006, Imiquimod, Flagellin were purchased from Invivogen, CA. Cell culture tested IL-1α, IL-1β and TNF-α cytokines were purchased from R&D Systems, S1P from Biomol International, PA. Sphk-1 (2-(p-Hydroxyanilino)-4-(p-chlorophenyl) thiazole) is a specific inhibitor for Sphk-1 that blocks the production of S1P), Wortmannin, U0126, LY 294002 and Akt inhibitors were purchased from EMD chemicals, NJ and SB 216763 was purchased from Tocris Bioscience, MO. Pre-validated siRNA specific to siSphk-1, siGSK-3β,control siRNA and transfection reagent siPORT NeoFX were purchased from Ambion, CA. Fugene 6 was purchased from Roche, IN. TransAM NF-kB p65 kit was purchased from Active Motif, CA and the ELISA kit for S1P was procured from Echelon Biosciences, UT, HBD-2 ELISA kit was from Peprotech, NJ and IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α were from BD biosciences, CA. The antibodies phospho-Glycogen synthase (Ser641), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (ERK 1/2) and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, MA and phospho-Sphk-1 (ser225) was from ECM biosciences, KY.

Cell culture and Challenge assays

HGECs were isolated and cultured as previously described [24], [25]. Briefly, when the cells were restored from frozen, they were subcultured and when reached confluence, they were pretreated for 2 h with 0.1 µM, 0.2 µM, 0.3 µM, 0.5 µM, 0.8 µM, 1.0 µM, 2.0 µM, 5.0 µM of Sphk-1 inhibitor and then challenged with FSL-1 (1 µg/ml) for 24 h. For TLR activation, heat inactivated P. gingivalis (MOI:100), FSL-1 (1 µg/ml), Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml), P. gingivalis LPS (1 µg/ml), E. Coli LPS (1 µg/ml), ssRNA (0.1 µg/ml), Poly I:C (5 µg/ml) ODN (0.5 µg/ml), Imiquimod (0.1 µg/ml), Flagellin (0.25 µg/mL), for IL-1R and TNF, IL-1α (2.5 ng/ml), IL-1β (2.5 ng/ml) and TNF-α (2.5 ng/ml) and S1P (100 nM) either in the presence or absence of Sphk-1 inhibition (2 µM). The challenge assay was performed for 24 h and culture supernatant was then collected. The secreted HBD-2 and cellular S1P was measured by ELISA. and NF-kB p65 was measured using TransAM NF-kB p65 kit in cells challenged with FSL-1 for 12 h after inhibiting Sphk-1 or GSK3.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The isolated total RNA samples were used to perform first strand cDNA synthesis (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Real-time PCR was performed by using 50 ng of cDNA with Sphk-1 (Assay ID: Hs00184211_m1), Sphk-2 (Hs00219999_m1) and GAPDH (Assay ID: 4333764F) as endogenous control as primers and probes on an ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems) in the presence of TaqMan DNA polymerase as previously described [26]. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control.


Primary epithelial cell cultures at the fourth passage were harvested, seeded at a density of 0.5×105cells/well in a 6 well culture plate coated with type-I collagen, and maintained in 2 ml of medium until they reached 50–60% confluency. The epithelial cells were transfected with 100 pmol of siGSK-3β or siSphk-1 or non-target siRNA pool. Briefly, 100 pmol of siRNA was mixed with siPORT NeoFX Transfection Agent and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The transfection mixture was then added drop wise to the respective wells and the reaction was incubated overnight. The following morning, the medium was replaced and cells were challenged as mentioned above. For pcDNA3-GSK3-β (S9A), pcDNA3-GSK3-β (K85A), pcDNA3 (empty vector control) and Sphk-1 overexpression, the plasmids were mixed with Fugene 6 transfection reagent and incubated for 15 min. The mixture was then added dropwise to the cells and transfection reaction was carried out for 24 h after which the cells were challenged as detailed above.

Western blotting

The Western blots were performed by loading 50 µg total proteins on to each lane [26]. After electrophoresis, the membranes were incubated with antibody against phospho- Sphk-1 (Ser225) antibody, phospho-ERK p42/p44 antibody, phospho-Glycogen synthase (Ser641) and β-actin used as loading control. The membranes were developed using ECL plus™ western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and exposed using KODAK Imaging station 4000 MM with chemiluminescence detection. Brightness and contrast if needed were adjusted using powerpoint.

Statistical analysis

The mRNA fold increase data was calculated according ΔΔCT method of Livak et al. [27]. Statistical analysis (analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison test) was done using GraphPad Pism 5.0 and GraphPad Instat 3.0. Statistical differences were considered significant at the p<0.05 level and indicated by an asterisk p<0.05 (*).


Dose dependent inhibition of HBD-2 by Sphk-1 inhibition

Sphk-1 catalyzes a novel lipid messenger S1P [13]. S1P regulates diverse physiological and pathological processes including cancer and inflammation involving proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in vitro and in animals [14], [28], [29]. HBD-2 is upregulated in various cancers [30], [31], [32], [33]. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that a direct link between the upregulation of Sphk-1, S1P and the induction of HBD-2 in oral keratinocytes. To address our hypothesis, we utilized the TLR2 ligand (FSL-1) to challenge HGECs as TLR2 has been shown to be an important receptor in gingival epithelial cell innate immune responses [26], [34]. First we pretreated primary HGECs with various concentrations of Sphk-1 inhibitor for 2 h followed by stimulating the cells with FSL-1 to determine the optimal dose. After 24 h of challenge, we measured HBD-2 induction by ELISA. The inhibition of Sphk-1 by a pharmacological inhibitor dose dependently inhibited the induction of HBD-2 in HGECs (Fig. 1A). We also wanted to check the phosphorylation state of Sphk-1 in the presence of Sphk-1 inhibitor to verify its kinase activity because the phosphorylation of Sphk-1 at Ser225 has been shown to elevate its kinase activity by increasing S1P production [20]. The total protein from the 60 min challenge with FSL-1 in the presence of different concentration of Sphk-1 inhibitor was subjected to immunoblot against phospho-specific Sphk-1 (Ser225). The inhibition revealed a dose dependent decrease in the level of phosphorylation of Sphk-1 at serine 225 (Fig. 1B). The phosphorylation of Sphk-1 at serine 225 by ERK 1/2 is critical for the activation of NF-kB by S1P [20]. Hence a decrease in the phophorylation level of Sphk-1 may account for decreased NF-kB activity limiting HBD-2 mRNA transcriptional activation: as NF-kB has been shown to be a critical transcription factor in the induction of HBD-2 [35].

Figure 1
Dose dependent inhibition of HBD-2 induction in HGECs upon Sphk-1 inhibition.

Inhibition of Sphk-1 abrogates HBD2 induction by keratinocytes

HBD-2 can be induced by the activation of various TLRs and possess strong antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria [36], [37], [38]. In order to see the effect of our Sphk-1 inhibition finding, we challenged HGECs with various TLR ligands either in the presence or absence of Sphk1 inhibiton for TLR2 (heat killed P. gingivalis, P. gingivalis LPS, Pam3CSK4, FSL-1) TLR3 (Poly I:C), TLR4 (E. coli LPS), TLR5 (Flagellin), TLR7 (ssRNA & Imiquimod), TLR9 (ODN) after determining the optimal doses for each of the agonists. Surprisingly, HBD-2 induction was significantly down-regulated in the presence of Sphk-1 inhibitor in cells treated with TLR ligands (Fig. 2A). This inhibition demonstrates that Sphk-1 activation is crucial in TLR mediated induction of HBD-2. It has already been shown that HBD-2 can be strongly induced by exogenous TNFα and IL-1β cytokines [35]. To address this issue and to check the effect of Sphk-1 inhibition on TNF and IL-1 receptors, we challenged the cells with IL-1α, IL-1β and TNFα in the presence or absence of Sphk-1 inhibition. We also utilized S1P, a ligand for the S1P1 receptor [19] in the presence or absence of the Sphk-1 inhibitor (sphingosine is converted to S1P by sphingosine kinase) [29]. Sphk-1 inhibitor strongly inhibited the induction of HBD-2 in cells treated with cytokines but not with the addition of extracellular S1P (Fig. 2B & C). Next, we performed a time course experiment for determining the phosphorylation state of Sphk-1 in the presence of inhibitor. The phosphorylation of Sphk-1 at Ser225 started as early as 30 min and reached its maximum at 90 min after addition of FSL-1 to the cells. However, the pharmacological inhibition of Sphk-1 down regulated its kinase activity by down regulating phosphorylation on Ser225 (Fig. 2D). We wanted to examine whether silencing of Sphk-1 mRNA with siRNA against Sphk-1 has the same effect as the pharmacological inhibition. HBD-2 induction was measured in HGECs transfected either with siRNA against Sphk-1 or non targeting siRNA, 24 h after challenge with FSL-1, Imiquimod and IL-1β. RNA silencing also revealed significant down regulation of HBD-2 in the cells transfected with siRNA against Sphk-1 confirming the results from pharmacological inhibition (Fig. 3A). We noted that the exogenous addition of S1P to the cells failed to induce HBD-2, in contrast to the data obtained in a mouse model [23], so we were compelled to examine the intracellular S1P levels both in the challenged state and also with inhibitor. Indeed, the agonist FSL-1 induced significantly higher intracellular S1P, an increase which was abrogated in the presence of Sphk-1 inhibitor (Fig. 3B) and correlated with the phosphorylation state of Sphk-1. Further, we wanted to test if Sphk-2 contributed to the increase of intracellular S1P levels in HGECs after challenging with FSL-1. Thus we performed real time PCR to determine the mRNA expression levels of both Sphk-1 and Sphk-2 in the challenged state. Sphk-1 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated compared to Sphk2 upon FSL-1 challenge (Fig. 3C). This data demonstrates that Sphk-1 is the predominant sphingosine kinase involved in the intracellular conversion of S1P in HGECs. These results clearly show intracellular S1P plays an important role in the induction of HBD-2 and also underline the importance of phosphorylated Sphk-1 at Ser225 in converting S1P when TLRs are triggered.

Figure 2
Sphk-1 inhibition down modulates agonists induced HBD-2.
Figure 3
RNAi mediated inhibition of Sphk-1 inhibits agonists induced HBD-2.

GSK-3β inhibition augments HBD-2 in oral keratinocytes

GSK3β is one of the major kinases involved in TLR signaling and is a serine threonine kinase regulating various cellular processes [39], [40]. GSK3 can be inhibited by phospho-Akt, a member of the PI3K pathway [41]. Its inhibition by lithium or SB 216763 (pharmacological inhibitor) increased the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 by driving the cells from the inflammatory pathway towards an anti-inflammatory pathway [41]. In A549 cells, PI3K has been shown to regulate HBD-2 secretion [35] and recently an antimicrobial peptide LL-37 has been shown to be upregulated by increased PI3K activity and the Akt pathway, suppressing GSK3 phosphorylation in HaCat cell lines [42]. Moreover, HBD-2 has also been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties like IL-10 [43]. Since GSK-3β is regulated by PI3K [41], we wanted to test whether the inhibitors against PI3K, AKT, MEK 1/2 and GSK3 influence HBD-2 induction in HGECs. We first pretreated HGECs with LY 294002 and Wortmannin (PI3K inhibitors), AKT inhibitor, U0126 (MEK inhibitor) and SB-216763 (GSK3 inhibitor) for 2 h followed by FSL-1 treatment for 24 h prior to measuring HBD-2 induction. The inhibitors of PI3K, AKT and U0126 abrogated the secretion of HBD-2 whereas GSK3 inhibitor induced significantly higher amounts of HBD-2 compared to FSL-1 alone. This data demonstrated that inhibition of GSK3 by SB 216763 augmented HBD-2 secretion via the PI3K dependent pathway (Fig. 4A). Our data on PI3K activity is in agreement with the HBD-2 induction reported in A549 cells [35]. We also wanted to test whether Sphk-1 is up or downstream of PI3K. If Sphk-1 is downstream of PI3K, the pharmacological inhibition of PI3K should down regulate Sphk-1 activity. To demonstrate this, the cells were pretreated with PI3K inhibitor LY294002 for 2 h and challenged with FSL-1 for 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 240 min. The total protein was collected and subjected to immunoblot against Sphk-1 phospho-specific antibody (Ser225). The immunoblot data clearly shows PI3K inhibition directly blocks the activity of Sphk-1 by decreasing the phosphorylation of Sphk-1 at Ser225 (Fig. 4B) and confirms that the Sphk-1 is downstream of PI3K in HGECs.

Figure 4
Inhibition of GSK3 augments HBD-2 induction.

The findings from the pharmacological inhibition of GSK3 compelled us to confirm if RNA silencing of GSK3-β will have similar effect to that of the inhibitor SB 216763. To address this, we transfected HGECs with siRNA against GSK3-β and challenged the cells with FSL-1 for 24 h. The silencing of GSK-3β significantly increased the induction of HBD-2 in the presence of FSL-1 demonstrating that the inhibition of GSK3-β either by siRNA or by pharmacological inhibition can augment HBD-2 induction in HGECs (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, we could not detect IL-10 in the culture supernatants of HGECs even after 96 h of post challenge with E. coli LPS, FSL-1, PAM3CSK4, Poly I:C or with heat inactivated P. gingivalis in the presence or absence of GSK3 inhibition.

The involvement of GSK-3β in regulating ERK 1/2 activation was assessed by pretreating the cells with U0126 and/or SB216763 before challenging with FSL-1 for 24 h. HBD-2 induction was dramatically upregulated in the presence of SB216763 and FSL-1. This upregulation was ablated in the presence of U0126 and SB216763 together (Fig. 4D). This data is in agreement with Rehani et al. (2008) who show that ERK 1/2 activation is mediated by the inhibition of GSK-3β [44]. We further investigated if SB216763 blocks GSK3 and functionally thus Glycogen synthase activity. To address this, the cells were pretreated with SB216763 and challenged with FSL-1 for 0, 30 and 60 min. The activity of Glycogen synthase was assessed by immunoblotting against phospho-Glycogen synthase (Ser641) antibody. The phosphorylation level of Glycogen synthase at Ser641 was significantly down regulated in the presence of SB216763 and FSL-1 demonstrating the specificity of GSK3 inhibition (Fig. 4E). Interestingly, the phophorylation levels of Sphk-1 at ser225 and ERK p42/p44 increased upon GSK3 inhibition (Fig. 4F). The increase in Sphk-1 might be due to the increase in ERK phosphorylation and its ability to phosphorylate Sphk-1 at Ser225 as observed earlier [20]. We also tested if Sphk-1 inhibition had any effect on ERK 1/2 activity. The inhibition of Sphk-1 showed no significant effect on ERK 1/2 activity as revealed by its phosphorylation at 60 min post challenge with Sphk-1 inhibition (Fig. 4G). This data demonstrates that Sphk-1 is a downstream kinase to ERK 1/2 in HGECs.

GSK3-β over-expression downregulated HBD-2 induction

Since we noted dramatic upregulation of HBD-2 following inhibition of GSK3 by a potent selective inhibitor SB 216763 and also by siRNA, we tested if the overexpression of GSK3-β downregulates HBD-2. Thus HGECs were transfected with plasmids carrying GSK3-β (K85A) expressing ‘kinase dead’ [45] (that lack kinase activity) and GSK3-β (S9A) mutated plasmid to see the effect on constitutively active GSK3-β and the contribution of serine 9 phosphorylation to the induction of HBD-2. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were challenged with FSL-1 for 24 h and HBD-2 levels were measured in the supernatants. When we over-expressed the constitutively active GSK3-β (S9A) followed by FSL-1 stimulation, the induction of HBD-2 was attenuated. However, when kinase dead GSK3-β (K85) was over-expressed, the HBD-2 induction was dramatically increased following FSL-1 challenge demonstrating GSK3-β strongly modulates HBD-2 induction in HGECs (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5
Overexpression of GSK3-β in HGECs.

Over-expression of Sphk-1 enhances HBD-2 induction

Sphk-1 has been shown to possess anti-apoptotic activity [46], in part due to increased intracellular S1P levels, because S1P regulates cellular proliferation [15]. Interestingly, HBD-2 levels have been shown to be higher in proliferating cells [47]. Since we noted the abrogation of HBD-2 by Sphk-1 inhibitor, we wanted to overexpress Sphk-1 in HGECs to check if it contributes to increase in the induction HBD-2. To demonstrate this, we over-expressed the Sphk-1 in HGECs by transient transfection. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were cultured with FSL-1 - for 24 h. The overexpression of Sphk-1 in HGECs markedly increased HBD-2 levels after FSL-1 challenge (Fig. 5B) confirming our hypothesis. Further, we also wanted to see the effect of HBD-2 induction by concomitant inhibition of GSK3 in cells overexpressing Sphk-1. First, we transfected the cells with Sphk-1 plasmid and at 24 h post transfection we pretreated the cells with SB 216763 for 2 h followed by FSL-1 treatment for 24 h. After 24 h of challenge, we noted robust increases in the induction of HBD-2 upon GSK3 inhibition in cells over-expressing Sphk-1. This data clearly demonstrates the pivotal roles of Sphk-1 and GSK3-β in the induction of HBD-2 (Fig. 5B).

We further investigated NF-kB activity by measuring p65 in cells pretreated with Sphk-1 inhibitor to check whether Sphk-1 inhibition caused NF-kB inactivation leading to down-regulated HBD-2 induction. The Sphk-1 inhibitor reduced NF-kB activity in HGECs upon FSL-1 treatment (but did not result in complete inhibition at the 2 µM concentration). This result is in agreement with the previously observed NF-kB activation following blocking of Sphk1 by anti-sense oligo [48]. Intriguingly, the inhibition of GSK3 by SB 216763 strongly upregulated NF-kB activity (Fig. 5C). The upregulation of NF-kB in the inhibition of GSK3 by SB 216763 shows that the kinase activity of GSK3 functions differently in non-myeloid cells and does not modulate IL-10 expression as it does in immune cells [41]. However, the mechanism of this increase in NF-kB activity upon inhibition of GSK3 in epithelial cells has yet to be explored. Since we noted upregulation of both ERK 1/2 and NF-kB on GSK-3 inhibition in HGECs, we wanted to see if there was any difference in proinflammatory cytokine induction. Interestingly, the induction of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNFα and IL-1β) was significantly upregulated upon GSK3 inhibition by SB 216763 (Fig. 5D). This is in marked contrast to immune cells where GSK3 inhibition down regulated proinflammatory cytokines [41]. Further investigation of the transcription factor CREB and its interaction with CBP in HGECs might uncover the mechanism for the different effects of GSK3 in non-myeloid cells.


Microbial elimination is a critical step in controlling the onset of chronic inflammation. Although this can be achieved by antibiotic treatment, development of microbial resistance is increasingly limiting antibiotic utility [49]. For this reason, a number of small molecules have been identified that may function as antimicrobial agents [50]. Short cationic peptides produced by cells with antibacterial and/or immunomodulatory activity are being heralded as novel approaches in the control of bacterial pathogenesis [51]. HBD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide that can be strongly induced by various microbial products. Stimulation of TLRs by its ligands results in the recruitment of an adaptor molecule, Myd88, which activates a downstream signaling pathway that includes interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase (IRAK) [52], which in turn activates NF-kB, p38 and JNK pathways that lead to proinflammatory cytokine and antimicrobial peptide secretion. Other than antimicrobial activity, HBD-2 has been shown to possess chemotactic properties, induce cytokines, promote DC maturation and antigen-specific B and T cell responses [53]. HBD-2 is primarily potent against Gram-negative bacteria [53] and disrupts bacterial membranes by electrostatic interaction between the HBD-2 and the negatively charged phospholipids on the bacteria or by formation of ion channels by defensin oligomers, whilst also blocking pathogen entry into host cells and inhibiting pathogen replication [53], [54], [55], [56]. There are several reports on the regulation and secretion of HBD-2 in various types of cells [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62]. However, the mechanism of HBD-2 induction by various microbial products that elicit antimicrobial defense through TLRs in epithelial cells has not been elucidated. Epithelial cell signaling is crucial in early defense against microbes as is HBD-2 regulation and secretion, in the recognition and clearance of bacteria in chronic inflammatory diseases such as periodontitis. Enhancing the production of epithelial HBD-2 to combat the pathogen attack is a valuable approach against sepsis.

It has recently been shown that the gene specific chromatin remodeling, accounts for transient silencing of proinflammatory cytokine genes and promoting antimicrobial gene activation [63]. Here we report for the first time the involvement of a novel kinase, Sphk-1 in the induction of the antimicrobial peptide HBD-2 that is augmented by suppressing GSK3-β in human oral keratinocytes independent of proinflammatory cytokine induction that involve TLRs-PI3K-Akt-GSK3-ERK1/2-Sphk-1 (Fig. 6). Moreover, we also show that the activation of various TLRs and cytokines such as IL-1α/β and TNFα can induce HBD-2, and Sphk-1 inhibition can ablate this induction. S1P has been shown to induce antimicrobial activity in a mouse model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, both in vivo and in vitro [21], [22], [23]. The host's innate immune response to M. tuberculosis is mainly elicited by TLR2 [64]. However, the mechanism of antimicrobial activity in these cases has not been explored. We have previously shown that S1P in combination with LPS cooperate in the induction of proinflammatory cytokines and the inhibition of Sphk-1 did not affect the induction of proinflammatory cytokines in HGECs [65]. Here we demonstrate that the Sphk-1 inhibitor dose dependently down-regulated HBD-2 induction through all the TLR ligands and cytokines tested. Additionally, we show that Sphk-1 is predominantly activated compared to its isoform Sphk-2 by a TLR2 ligand in HGECs. In order to confirm and extend the mechanism behind this, we carried out experiments using TLR2 as a representative receptor because TLR2 has been implicated as an important receptor in the human gingival keratinocyte innate immune response [26] and is required for innate responses to P. gingivalis [66] and its clearance in vivo [67] and also has been shown to activate PI3K [68]. It is well known that PI3K can mediate activation of various TLRs [69] hence it is plausible to focus on TLR2 as a model receptor to dissect HBD-2 induction pathway by TLRs in HGECs. Interestingly, TLR2 stimulation enhanced Sphk-1 activation by increasing its phosphorylation at Ser225. Phosphorylation events of Sphk-1 are dependent on ERK 1/2 [20]. The only phosphorylation site of Sphk-1 at Ser225 is involved not only in its catalytic activity but is also important in its translocation to the plasma membrane [29] where sphingosine is converted to S1P and this conversion leads to cell proliferation and survival which is supported by over-expression of kinase inactive enzyme [70]. In conjunction, HBD-2 has been shown to be elevated in proliferating cells [47]. Our data on phosphorylation of Sphk-1 is in agreement with the above wherein PI3K and MEK inhibitor suppressed the agonist activated phosphorylation of Sphk-1 as well as the induction of HBD-2. Moreover, Sphk-1 inhibition did not affect the activation of ERK 1/2 in HGECs. Interestingly, HBD-2 activity is also increased in some viral infections such as activity against RSV infection [71], viral haemorrhagic septicaemia rhabdovirus [72], HIV-I [73], and papilloma virus [74]. Moreover, the activity of Sphk-1 has been shown to be increased in viral infections [75]. Compatible with the above, inhibition of Sphk-1 has been shown to increase NS3 viral replication in bovine viral diarrhea [75]. Perhaps, the inhibition of Sphk-1 may result in down regulation of antimicrobial peptide synthesis which might have affected enhanced viral replication. Hence increasing HBD-2 by modulating the kinase activity of Sphk-1 and kinase inactivation of GSK3-β can be seen as a valuable intervention against viral attack.

Figure 6
Model of mechanism involved in HBD-2 secretion in gingival epithelial cells.

GSK3 is part of the PI3K signaling network and is also one of the major kinases regulating TLR signaling. Inhibition of GSK3 by lithium or SB 216763 (pharmacological inhibitor) or by siRNA increased the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 by driving the immune cells from an inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory pathway [41]. S1P has also been reported to induce anti-inflammatory activity, which is achieved by sequestering lymphocytes in lymph nodes [76]. To our surprise, the inhibition of GSK3-β augmented both HBD-2 and proinflammatory cytokines like IL-6, TNFα and IL-1β. In support of this, transient silencing of GSK3β up-regulated agonist induced HBD-2. Further, the agonist induced HBD-2 was down-regulated by ERK 1/2 inhibition. In addition inhibition of both GSK3 and ERK 1/2 at the same time down-regulated HBD-2. This indicates that the inhibition of GSK3 enhances ERK 1/2 activation. To further verify whether and if GSK3 inhibition is specific, the phosphorylation of glycogen-synthase kinase (a downstream kinase of GSK3) was assessed. The phosphorylation level of glycogen-synthase (Ser641) was markedly down regulated with SB 216763 treatment demonstrating the efficacy of GSK3 inhibition. The inhibitory role of GSK3-β was further verified by over-expression of kinase dead GSK3-β. In this case constitutively active GSK3β (S9A) inhibited HBD-2 possibly blocking the activation of ERK 1/2. But the secretion of HBD-2 was restored by kinase dead GSK3-β over-expression. Concomitant overexpression and suppression of Sphk-1 and GSK3 respectively, yielded higher HBD-2 induction.

Our present findings demonstrate that Sphk-1 regulates HBD-2 induction by TLRs at least in human oral epithelial cells. The suppression of HBD-2 by pharmacological inhibition of Sphk-1 was further confirmed with RNAi. We have also experimentally shown the increase in Sphk-1 activity by TLR activation contributes to an increase in the intracellular S1P. In contrast to intracellular S1P data, extracellular addition of S1P failed to up-regulate HBD-2 in our model. Activation of S1P1 by extracellular S1P may require TLR cooperation as demonstrated earlier [65]. However, further experimental evidence is needed to confirm the role of extracellular activation of S1P1 in gingival keratinocytes. The increase in Sphk-1 activity may be due to the up regulated ERK 1/2 phosphorylation and agonist induced GSK3-β inhibition. Additionally, PI3K involvement in increasing ERK 1/2 phosphorylation by inhibition of GSK3 has been shown previously [77], [78]. This increase might be due to the suppression of phospho-RAC1 at Ser71 and subsequent phosphorylation of PAK1 at Ser199/204 and cRaf at Ser338 activating ERK 1/2 as observed in human monocytes by Rehani et al. (2008) [44] or due to the activation of PKCδ as observed in human cell lines HT29 and Caco-2 by Wang et al. (2006) [79]. In contrast to the above findings, we observed increased NF-kB activity upon GSK3 inhibition. This show GSK3 negatively or positively affects either ERK 1/2 and/or NF-kB in a cell type specific manner. Further understanding of the involvement of different transcription factors will answer basic mechanistic questions involved in HBD-2 induction. In HGECs, ligand induced suppression of GSK3-β may induce chromatin modifications of both proinflammatory cytokine and antimicrobial peptide genes that result in higher gene activation. Activation of proinflammatory genes after GSK3 inhibition may be exclusive to non-myeloid cells such as HGECs as similar experiments with immune cells show decreased proinflammatory gene activation [41]. Moreover, the absence of IL-10 calls into question the ability of epithelial cells to dampen the inflammation caused by bacteria or viruses. Epithelium may have been evolved to induce proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to recruit immune cells to the site of infection in lieu of secreting anti-inflammatory cytokine such as IL-10 to dampen the inflammation on its own. However it can induce antimicrobial peptides to combat against invading microbes.

The present investigation identifies: i) Sphk-1 as a critical kinase involved in TLR mediated human β-defensin 2 induction and modulation in HGECs; ii) activation of TLRs induces phosphorylation of Sphk-1 and its intracellular activity by enhanced conversion of S1P; and iii) activated PI3K suppresses GSK3-β augmenting HBD-2 induction. Collectively, it is plausible to hypothesize that the modulation of Sphk-1 and GSK3-β to induce and enhance HBD-2 production may help cells combat bacterial insult and thus they have potential therapeutic value.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by United States Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, NIDCR grant DE017384 to DFK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546–1554. [PubMed]
2. Danai P, Martin GS. Epidemiology of sepsis: recent advances. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2005;7:329–334. [PubMed]
3. Danai PA, Sinha S, Moss M, Haber MJ, Martin GS. Seasonal variation in the epidemiology of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:410–415. [PubMed]
4. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002;415:389–395. [PubMed]
5. Scott MG, Hancock RE. Cationic antimicrobial peptides and their multifunctional role in the immune system. Crit Rev Immunol. 2000;20:407–431. [PubMed]
6. Lehrer RI, Ganz T. Antimicrobial peptides in mammalian and insect host defence. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;11:23–27. [PubMed]
7. Ganz T. Antimicrobial polypeptides in host defense of the respiratory tract. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:693–697. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:710–720. [PubMed]
9. Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of vertebrates. C R Biol. 2004;327:539–549. [PubMed]
10. Huttner KM, Bevins CL. Antimicrobial peptides as mediators of epithelial host defense. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:785–794. [PubMed]
11. Kaiser V, Diamond G. Expression of mammalian defensin genes. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;68:779–784. [PubMed]
12. Diamond G, Kaiser V, Rhodes J, Russell JP, Bevins CL. Transcriptional regulation of beta-defensin gene expression in tracheal epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68:113–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Hait NC, Allegood J, Maceyka M, Strub GM, Harikumar KB, et al. Regulation of histone acetylation in the nucleus by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science. 2009;325:1254–1257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Shida D, Takabe K, Kapitonov D, Milstien S, Spiegel S. Targeting SphK1 as a new strategy against cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9:662–673. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Spiegel S, Milstien S. Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a key cell signaling molecule. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:25851–25854. [PubMed]
16. Karliner JS. Sphingosine kinase and sphingosine 1-phosphate in cardioprotection. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009;53:189–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Kennedy S, Kane KA, Pyne NJ, Pyne S. Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling for cardioprotection. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:194–201. [PubMed]
18. Means CK, Brown JH. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor signalling in the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;82:193–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Lee MJ, Van Brocklyn JR, Thangada S, Liu CH, Hand AR, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate as a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor EDG-1. Science. 1998;279:1552–1555. [PubMed]
20. Pitson SM, Moretti PA, Zebol JR, Lynn HE, Xia P, et al. Activation of sphingosine kinase 1 by ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J. 2003;22:5491–5500. [PubMed]
21. Garg SK, Santucci MB, Panitti M, Pucillo L, Bocchino M, et al. Does sphingosine 1-phosphate play a protective role in the course of pulmonary tuberculosis? Clin Immunol. 2006;121:260–264. [PubMed]
22. Garg SK, Valente E, Greco E, Santucci MB, De Spirito M, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances antimycobacterial activity both in vitro and ex vivo. Clin Immunol. 2006;121:23–28. [PubMed]
23. Garg SK, Volpe E, Palmieri G, Mattei M, Galati D, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces antimicrobial activity both in vitro and in vivo. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:2129–2138. [PubMed]
24. Kinane DF, Shiba H, Stathopoulou PG, Zhao H, Lappin DF, et al. Gingival epithelial cells heterozygous for Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms Asp299Gly and Thr399ile are hypo-responsive to Porphyromonas gingivalis. Genes Immun. 2006;7:190–200. [PubMed]
25. Shiba H, Venkatesh SG, Gorr SU, Barbieri G, Kurihara H, et al. Parotid secretory protein is expressed and inducible in human gingival keratinocytes. J Periodontal Res. 2005;40:153–157. [PubMed]
26. Benakanakere MR, Li Q, Eskan MA, Singh AV, Zhao J, et al. Modulation of TLR2 protein expression by miR-105 in human oral keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:23107–23115. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [PubMed]
28. Shida D, Fang X, Kordula T, Takabe K, Lepine S, et al. Cross-talk between LPA1 and epidermal growth factor receptors mediates up-regulation of sphingosine kinase 1 to promote gastric cancer cell motility and invasion. Cancer Res. 2008;68:6569–6577. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Spiegel S, Milstien S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate: an enigmatic signalling lipid. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:397–407. [PubMed]
30. Markeeva N, Lisovskiy I, Lyzogubov V, Usenko V, Soldatkina M, et al. Expression of beta-defensin-2 in human gastric tumors: a pilot study. Exp Oncol. 2005;27:130–135. [PubMed]
31. Haider AS, Peters SB, Kaporis H, Cardinale I, Fei J, et al. Genomic analysis defines a cancer-specific gene expression signature for human squamous cell carcinoma and distinguishes malignant hyperproliferation from benign hyperplasia. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:869–881. [PubMed]
32. Arimura Y, Ashitani J, Yanagi S, Tokojima M, Abe K, et al. Elevated serum beta-defensins concentrations in patients with lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:4051–4057. [PubMed]
33. Mizukawa N, Sawaki K, Yamachika E, Fukunaga J, Ueno T, et al. Presence of human beta-defensin-2 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:2005–2007. [PubMed]
34. Eskan MA, Hajishengallis G, Kinane DF. Differential activation of human gingival epithelial cells and monocytes by Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae. Infect Immun. 2007;75:892–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Jang BC, Lim KJ, Paik JH, Kwon YK, Shin SW, et al. Up-regulation of human beta-defensin 2 by interleukin-1beta in A549 cells: involvement of PI3K, PKC, p38 MAPK, JNK, and NF-kappaB. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;320:1026–1033. [PubMed]
36. Harder J, Bartels J, Christophers E, Schroder JM. A peptide antibiotic from human skin. Nature. 1997;387:861. [PubMed]
37. Harder J, Meyer-Hoffert U, Wehkamp K, Schwichtenberg L, Schroder JM. Differential gene induction of human beta-defensins (hBD-1, -2, -3, and -4) in keratinocytes is inhibited by retinoic acid. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123:522–529. [PubMed]
38. O'Neil DA, Porter EM, Elewaut D, Anderson GM, Eckmann L, et al. Expression and regulation of the human beta-defensins hBD-1 and hBD-2 in intestinal epithelium. J Immunol. 1999;163:6718–6724. [PubMed]
39. Garcia CA, Wang H, Benakanakere MR, Barrett E, Kinane DF, et al. c-Jun controls the ability of IL-12 to induce IL-10 production from human memory CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 2009;183:4475–4482. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Garcia CA, Benakanakere MR, Alard P, Kosiewicz MM, Kinane DF, et al. Antigenic experience dictates functional role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in human CD4+ T cell responses. J Immunol. 2008;181:8363–8371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Martin M, Rehani K, Jope RS, Michalek SM. Toll-like receptor-mediated cytokine production is differentially regulated by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:777–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Carretero M, Escamez MJ, Garcia M, Duarte B, Holguin A, et al. In vitro and in vivo wound healing-promoting activities of human cathelicidin LL-37. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:223–236. [PubMed]
43. Donnarumma G, Paoletti I, Buommino E, Iovene MR, Tudisco L, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of moxifloxacin and human beta-defensin 2 association in human lung epithelial cell line (A549) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. Peptides. 2007;28:2286–2292. [PubMed]
44. Rehani K, Scott DA, Renaud D, Hamza H, Williams LR, et al. Cotinine-induced convergence of the cholinergic and PI3 kinase-dependent anti-inflammatory pathways in innate immune cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:375–382. [PubMed]
45. Eldar-Finkelman H, Argast GM, Foord O, Fischer EH, Krebs EG. Expression and characterization of glycogen synthase kinase-3 mutants and their effect on glycogen synthase activity in intact cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:10228–10233. [PubMed]
46. Olivera A, Kohama T, Edsall L, Nava V, Cuvillier O, et al. Sphingosine kinase expression increases intracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate and promotes cell growth and survival. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:545–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Markeeva N, Lysovskiy I, Zhuravel E, Soldatkina M, Lyzogubov V, et al. Involvement of human beta-defensin-2 in proliferation of transformed cells of human cervix. Exp Oncol. 2005;27:308–313. [PubMed]
48. Zhi L, Leung BP, Melendez AJ. Sphingosine kinase 1 regulates pro-inflammatory responses triggered by TNFalpha in primary human monocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2006;208:109–115. [PubMed]
49. Gould IM. Antibiotic resistance: the perfect storm. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(Suppl 3):S2–5. [PubMed]
50. Travis SM, Singh PK, Welsh MJ. Antimicrobial peptides and proteins in the innate defense of the airway surface. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001;13:89–95. [PubMed]
51. Hancock RE, Sahl HG. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1551–1557. [PubMed]
52. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:499–511. [PubMed]
53. Yang D, Biragyn A, Hoover DM, Lubkowski J, Oppenheim JJ. Multiple roles of antimicrobial defensins, cathelicidins, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in host defense. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:181–215. [PubMed]
54. White SH, Wimley WC, Selsted ME. Structure, function, and membrane integration of defensins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995;5:521–527. [PubMed]
55. Yang D, Biragyn A, Kwak LW, Oppenheim JJ. Mammalian defensins in immunity: more than just microbicidal. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:291–296. [PubMed]
56. Yang D, Chen Q, Hoover DM, Staley P, Tucker KD, et al. Many chemokines including CCL20/MIP-3alpha display antimicrobial activity. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74:448–455. [PubMed]
57. Krisanaprakornkit S, Kimball JR, Dale BA. Regulation of human beta-defensin-2 in gingival epithelial cells: the involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, but not the NF-kappaB transcription factor family. J Immunol. 2002;168:316–324. [PubMed]
58. Nakayama K, Furusu A, Xu Q, Konta T, Kitamura M. Unexpected transcriptional induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 by proteasome inhibition: involvement of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase-activator protein 1 pathway. J Immunol. 2001;167:1145–1150. [PubMed]
59. Yamaguchi Y, Nagase T, Makita R, Fukuhara S, Tomita T, et al. Identification of multiple novel epididymis-specific beta-defensin isoforms in humans and mice. J Immunol. 2002;169:2516–2523. [PubMed]
60. Biragyn A, Ruffini PA, Leifer CA, Klyushnenkova E, Shakhov A, et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent activation of dendritic cells by beta-defensin 2. Science. 2002;298:1025–1029. [PubMed]
61. Vora P, Youdim A, Thomas LS, Fukata M, Tesfay SY, et al. Beta-defensin-2 expression is regulated by TLR signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:5398–5405. [PubMed]
62. Liu L, Roberts AA, Ganz T. By IL-1 signaling, monocyte-derived cells dramatically enhance the epidermal antimicrobial response to lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 2003;170:575–580. [PubMed]
63. Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R. Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature. 2007;447:972–978. [PubMed]
64. Yoshida A, Inagawa H, Kohchi C, Nishizawa T, Soma G. The role of toll-like receptor 2 in survival strategies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophage phagosomes. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:907–910. [PubMed]
65. Eskan MA, Rose BG, Benakanakere MR, Zeng Q, Fujioka D, et al. TLR4 and S1P receptors cooperate to enhance inflammatory cytokine production in human gingival epithelial cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:1138–1147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Burns E, Bachrach G, Shapira L, Nussbaum G. Cutting Edge: TLR2 is required for the innate response to Porphyromonas gingivalis: activation leads to bacterial persistence and TLR2 deficiency attenuates induced alveolar bone resorption. J Immunol. 2006;177:8296–8300. [PubMed]
67. Burns E, Eliyahu T, Uematsu S, Akira S, Nussbaum G. TLR2-dependent inflammatory response to Porphyromonas gingivalis is MyD88 independent, whereas MyD88 is required to clear infection. J Immunol. 184:1455–1462. [PubMed]
68. Hajishengallis G, Wang M, Liang S. Induction of distinct TLR2-mediated proinflammatory and proadhesive signaling pathways in response to Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae. J Immunol. 2009;182:6690–6696. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Ruse M, Knaus UG. New players in TLR-mediated innate immunity: PI3K and small Rho GTPases. Immunol Res. 2006;34:33–48. [PubMed]
70. Pitson SM, Xia P, Leclercq TM, Moretti PA, Zebol JR, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent translocation of sphingosine kinase to the plasma membrane drives its oncogenic signalling. J Exp Med. 2005;201:49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Kota S, Sabbah A, Chang TH, Harnack R, Xiang Y, et al. Role of human beta-defensin-2 during tumor necrosis factor-alpha/NF-kappaB-mediated innate antiviral response against human respiratory syncytial virus. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:22417–22429. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Falco A, Chico V, Marroqui L, Perez L, Coll JM, et al. Expression and antiviral activity of a beta-defensin-like peptide identified in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) EST sequences. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:757–765. [PubMed]
73. Quinones-Mateu ME, Lederman MM, Feng Z, Chakraborty B, Weber J, et al. Human epithelial beta-defensins 2 and 3 inhibit HIV-1 replication. AIDS. 2003;17:F39–48. [PubMed]
74. Chong KT, Xiang L, Wang X, Jun EL, Xi LF, et al. High level expression of human epithelial beta-defensins (hBD-1, 2 and 3) in papillomavirus induced lesions. Virol J. 2006;3:75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Yamane D, Zahoor MA, Mohamed YM, Azab W, Kato K, et al. Inhibition of sphingosine kinase by bovine viral diarrhea virus NS3 is crucial for efficient viral replication and cytopathogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:13648–13659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Mandala S, Hajdu R, Bergstrom J, Quackenbush E, Xie J, et al. Alteration of lymphocyte trafficking by sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists. Science. 2002;296:346–349. [PubMed]
77. Martin M, Schifferle RE, Cuesta N, Vogel SN, Katz J, et al. Role of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-Akt pathway in the regulation of IL-10 and IL-12 by Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 2003;171:717–725. [PubMed]
78. Jiang K, Zhong B, Gilvary DL, Corliss BC, Hong-Geller E, et al. Pivotal role of phosphoinositide-3 kinase in regulation of cytotoxicity in natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:419–425. [PubMed]
79. Wang Q, Zhou Y, Wang X, Evers BM. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is a negative regulator of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Oncogene. 2006;25:43–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science