Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of intorthopspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsOpen ChoiceSubmit Online
Int Orthop. 2008 December; 32(6): 799–804.
Published online 2007 August 28. doi:  10.1007/s00264-007-0438-2
PMCID: PMC2898943

Language: | French

Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic type D medial plica


We aimed to review the results of subtotal arthroscopic resection of symptomatic type D medial plica. We retrospectively evaluated 23 knees with symptomatic type D medial plica in 22 patients without other intra-articular pathology. All patients complained of chronic knee pain that had not been alleviated by medical treatment or physical therapy. In only three (13%) of the patients studied was the plica diagnosed pre-operatively with magnetic resonance imaging. The type D medial plicae in our series were classified as fenestrated (14 knees), torn (5 knees), or reduplicated (4 knees). Fibrotic changes in the plicae and degenerative changes on the medial femoral condyle were found in 16 knees Patellofemoral chondromalacia was present in three knees Arthroscopic partial resection was performed in all patients. Comparative Lysholm Knee Scale scores before and after surgery revealed a significant clinical improvement (pre-operative status, 67.19 ± 8.05 vs. post-operative status, 90.57 ± 9.80; P < 0.001). Type D medial plica should be considered as a possible cause of chronic knee pain. Arthroscopic partial resection of the plicae in symptomatic patients gives satisfactory results.

Keywords: Medial plica, Patellofemoral pain, Arthroscopy


Nous avons revu, pour cette étude, les résultats de la résection arthroscopique des plica internes symptomatiques de type B. Cette étude rétrospective a évalué 23 genoux présentant une telle pathologie dont 22 patients sans autre anomalie intra-articulaire. Tous les patients se plaignaient de douleurs chroniques du genou non améliorées par le traitement médical ou kinésithérapique. Seulement 3 patients (13%) ont bénéficié d’un diagnostic pré-opératoire par IRM. Ceux-ci étaient classés dans notre série comme « fenestré » (14 genoux), rompus (5 genoux) et redupliqués (4 genoux). Des modifications fibreuses et dégénératives du condyle fémoral interne ont été trouvées dans 16 genoux de même qu’une chondramalasie fémoro patellaire (3 genoux). Une résection arthroscopique a été réalisée chez tous les patients. Ceux-ci ont été évalués selon le score de Lysholm en pré et post-opératoire. L’amélioration a été significative (en préopératoire, 67,19 ± 8,05, post-opératoire 90,57 ± 9,80 , P < 0,001). Le plica interne de type B peut donc être considéré comme une cause possible de douleur chronique du genou, sa résection arthroscopique entraîne des résultats parfaitement satisfaisants.


Medial plica, a normal synovial remnant of mesenchymal tissue [3, 20], has its origin on the medial wall of the knee joint, runs obliquely, and inserts onto the synovium to cover the medial infrapatellar fat pad [5]. The existence of a medial plica is a common arthroscopic finding in adults, in which population the frequency of medial plica ranges from 19% to 60% [1, 7, 13, 14, 22], but it is rarely a cause of discomfort [20, 22]. A hypertrophic medial plica is one of the causes of the anterior knee pain [8]. Repetitive mechanical injury or direct trauma may cause chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and thickening of the plica, which may then cause symptoms [5] such as pain, crepitus, snapping, popping, or effusion. The clinical picture of medial plica mimics that of medial meniscal tears or patellar maltracking [9]. The snapping plica can sometimes be palpated at the medial edge of the patella, and local compression can cause pain [12].

Medial plicae have been classified into four types according to Sakakibara [24]. Type A is a small cord-like ridge on the medial wall. Type B has a shelf-like appearance, but does not cover the anterior surface of the medial condyle. Type C is a large shelf that covers the anterior medial femoral condyle. Type D, which has the lowest prevalence, but the greatest clinical importance, has a double insertion into the medial wall [16, 24, 25]. We included only type D medial plica, which is considered most likely to cause problems [6, 16, 21]. The goals of this study were to identify the arthroscopic findings of patients with symptomatic type D medial plica and to review the results of arthroscopic surgery.

Patients and methods

Medical records of 3,138 arthroscopies were accessed from March 2000 to August 2004. Arthroscopic treatment was performed by six surgeons in two medical centres. Medical records were investigated by two examiners. Twenty-three knees in 22 patients (8 women and 14 men) with a sympomatic type D medial plica were selected for this study and evaluated retrospectively according to medical records. Plicae that were accompanied with other intra-articular pathologies such as meniscal tear and ligamentous injury were excluded from the study. All patients complained of chronic knee pain that had not been relieved by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and quadriceps exercises for at least 3 months before operation.

In all patients, clinical symptoms and physical, radiological and intra-operative findings were evaluated. Pre-operative and post-operative Lysholm Knee Scale scores were assessed from the information in medical records. Post-operative scores were calculated on the third week follow-up (18–29 days). Every patient was scaled (0–100) related with their complaints during activities. After the first day of operation, patients are allowed mobilisation and physical therapy was begun. MRI graphics of type D plica were carried out, reviewed retrospectively and searched for findings of pathological plica. The average follow-up period was 21 months (range 13–24 months). No clinical deterioration was encountered during the follow-up period.

All patients were treated with arthroscopic surgery under tourniquet. Anteromedial, anterolateral, and superolateral portals were used. The arthroscope was placed through the anterolateral portal, and each plica was partially resected with punch and shaved through the anteromedial and superolateral portals. There was no need to control bleeding. Early post-operative range of motion and weight-bearing was allowed in all patients.

Photographic documentation of plicae was evaluated retrospectively for subtyping. Type D medial plicae were further classified into three subgroups according to Matsusue’s classification as fenestrated, reduplicated, or torn [16]. The degeneration on the contact surface of the medial femoral condyle cartilage with the plica was evaluated according to the modified Outerbridge classification [21]. Statistical evaluation of Lysholm knee scores was made by using paired t test.


The mean age of the patients was 42.4 years (range, 23–60 years). Fifteen right knees and eight left knees were studied. One patient exhibited bilateral involvement. Six patients had a history of trauma, and the remaining patients described an insidious onset of symptoms. During the pre-operative physical examination, all patients reported chronic knee pain. The localisation of that pain was anterior in 5 knees, medial in 11, lateral in 2, and both anterior and medial in 5. The minimum time interval from the onset of symptoms to surgery was 3 months. The results of the patellar grinding test (manual patellofemoral compression against quadriceps contraction) were positive in seven knees. In addition to pain, one patient complained of swelling in the knee and restricted range of motion, and another reported a “giving way” sensation.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were conducted in 20 (87%) patients, and medial plica was demonstrated pre-operatively in only 3 (15%) of those individuals. A hypointense band anterior to the medial condyle was defined as medial plica on T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Grade II degeneration of the medial meniscus was found in eight patients during evaluation by MRI.

All medial plicae were identified via arthroscopic examination and were classified as torn (5 knees) (Fig. 1), reduplicated (4 knees) (Fig. 2), or fenestrated (14 knees) (Fig. 3). Hypertrophic changes of the plica, such as thickening or loss of elasticity, were found in 16 knees that exhibited degenerative changes on the medial femoral condyle. Those degenerative changes were noted on the cartilage surface of the medial femoral condyle that was in contact with the medial plica. According to the Outerbridge classification, seven knees had no degeneration, one knee had grade I degeneration, eight knees had grade II degeneration, and seven knees had grade III degeneration on the medial femoral condyle (Table 1). Four knees had softening of the patellar cartilage, which could be confirmed by palpation with probe. Three knees had no intra-articular degenerative findings and were completely normal except their hypertrophic plica. Additional intra-articular lesions that could have been a source of symptoms were not identified in any of the patients studied; all medial menisci were intact. In the early post-operative period, two patient had restriction in the range of motion because of effusion, but they resolved after 2 weeks. The patients’ complaints cleared up in the follow-up period. The functional outcome was satisfactory in 20 patients. Three knees of two patients who had a score below 75 complained of pain. One of them was the oldest patient in our group who had advanced degenerative changes in the medial femoral compartment (G2 and G3). The other patient defaulted on physical therapy. All of the patients regained a full range of motion. The paired samples t test indicated a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) between pre-operative (67.19 ± 8.05) and post-operative (90.57 ± 9.80) Lysholm Knee Scale scores.

Fig. 1
Torn medial plica with multiple perforations in a 45-year-old female patient
Fig. 2
Arthroscopic view of a reduplicated plica in the left knee of a 54-year-old male patient
Fig. 3
Right knee of a 40-year-old male patient. Note the fenestrated medial plica during the extension (A) and flexion (B) of the knee, the impingement between the plica and the femoral condyle (white arrow), and the degeneration of the cartilage on the medial ...
Table 1
Demographics, arthroscopic findings and pre-operative and post-operative Lysholm Knee Scale scores of the study subjects


The plicae are remnants of mesenchymal tissue [3, 20]. The medial plica was described by Iino in 1939 [10] and was later classified into four types by Sakakibara [24]. Type D is a large shelf that covers the anteromedial femoral condylar surface and has a double insertion on the medial wall. Matsusue and colleagues found that the rate of the symptomatic plica was 1.9% in their series and divided the type D classification into three subgroups (fenestrated, reduplicated, or torn) [16]. Our prevalence of symptomatic plica (0.73%) was not as high as their result. The discrepancy can be explained by the exclusion criteria of our study. We did not include the patient with intra-articular pathologies other than the symptomatic plica. The fenestrated plicae had the highest prevalence (70%) in their study [16]. We had similar results. Most of our patients (57%) who required surgery had a fenestrated plica.

Medial plicae usually cause no symptoms. Type D plica is less common, but is more likely to cause symptoms because it may impinge on the medial femoral condyle and the medial patellar facet [5, 22]. Type D plicae are believed to cause symptoms after acute or repetitive trauma stimulates an inflammatory reaction. Local synovitis and irritation of the nerve endings induce the subsequent knee pain [18]. All of our patients complained pre-operatively of chronic knee pain lasting more than 3 months. A history of acute knee trauma was reported by only five of our patients. We postulated that chronic repetitive injuries were probably responsible for the symptoms in our other patients, but we do not have specific data to support this conclusion.

Fibrotic changes occur in the plicae as a result of chronic inflammation [8]. A medial plica in close contact with the medial femoral condyle abrades the chondral surface during flexion of the knee [19]. This type of mechanical irritation results in degenerative changes [15]. The combination of chondral and inflammatory changes may be responsible for knee pain. Barber found that the symptoms caused by a medial plica were relieved by resection in 80% of his patients, although the noticeable articular cartilage disruptions on the medial femoral condyle were present in only one-third of the knees of those patients [1]. Chow and colleagues found no relationship between symptoms and cartilage lesions caused by a hypertrophic synovium [4]. We noted that medial femoral condyle degeneration correlated with hypertrophic changes such as thickening and stiffness in the plica. Although the chondral lesions remained in 16 patients whose lesions varied between grade 1 and grade 2, the pain was relieved in all of our patients who underwent medial plica resection. We concluded that the pain was generated by inflammatory changes caused by the medial plica and that the cartilaginous lesions did not contribute significantly to the patient’s symptoms.

Physical examination is an important diagnostic tool for medial plica. However, medial plica can mimic other intrarticular disorders such as meniscal tears, patellar chondromalacia, or patellar maltracking [7, 25]. Pain caused by medial plica is usually localised to the anteromedial part of the knee. However, Matsusue and colleagues have shown that pain was localised on the lateral side of the knees in 50% of the patients with type D plica in their series [16]. Only two patients had lateral knee pain in our series, although the cause of that pain was not clear. The pain may have been due to the effect of traction on the lateral side of capsule through the infrapatellar fat pad and plica alaris lateralis [6].

MRI may be useful in the diagnosis of plica. Jee and colleagues have reported a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 72% for the diagnosis of plica by MRI [11]. On MRI, the medial plica is seen as a hypointense medial synovial band between the medial border of the patella and the synovium. However, the decision to operate should not be made solely on the basis of MRI findings, because most plicae cause no symptoms. No imaging studies can reliably differentiate a normal plica from an abnormal plica. Furthermore, it is not possible to identify the subtypes of type D medial plica with MRI [2].

Pre-operative MRI findings were not diagnostic in 87% of our patients. However, the results of MRI were useful in excluding other intra-articular lesions, such as meniscal tears, that may have caused symptoms. We were not able to diagnose pathological plica in most of our patients before the operation. The precise diagnosis was made during the arthroscopic operation. The decision to operate was based on clinical criteria and made after the patient had undergone a minimum of 3 months of medical and physical therapy. Some authors have advocated intraplical steroid injection as the initial step of treatment [23]. We did not perform the steroid injection because we are not able to have a precise diagnosis before arthroscopic surgery. We also believe that empirical treatment with a steroid injection that is administered before the diagnosis can be confirmed via arthroscopy is unnecessary.

Excellent results have been reported after the excision of symptomatic medial plica in most of the series published in the literature [9, 12, 17]. Equally good clinical results have been achieved after total or partial resection [12]. Subtotal resection was performed in all of our patients. We retained a peripheral rim of plicae to avoid irritating the capsule and to prevent scarring. Partial resection yielded satisfactory results according to post-operative Lysholm Knee Scale scores. No revision was needed for the additional resection of the remaining crest.

We concluded that type D medial plica should be considered as a possible cause of chronic knee pain. Arthroscopic partial resection of the plica in symptomatic patients produces excellent results.


Research was performed at the Medical Faculties of Baskent University and Istanbul University.


1. Barber FA. Fenestrated medial patella plica. Arthroscopy. 1987;3(4):253–257. [PubMed]
2. Boles CA, Butler J, Lee JA, Reedy ML, Martin DF. Magnetic resonance characteristics of medial plica of the knee: correlation with arthroscopic resection. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28(3):397–401. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Calpur OU, Copuroglu C, Ozcan M. United unresorbed medial and lateral plicae as anterior mesenchymal synovial septal remnant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10(6):378–380. doi: 10.1007/s00167-002-0297-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Chow JC, Hantes M, Houle JB. Hypertrophy of the synovium in the anteromedial aspect of the knee joint following trauma: an unusual cause of knee pain. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(7):735–740. [PubMed]
5. Clarke HD, Scott WN, Insall JN. Anatomic aberrations. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, editors. Surgery of the knee. 3. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. pp. 90–93.
6. Dorchak JD, Barrack RL, Kneisl JS, Alexander AH. Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic synovial plica of the knee. Long-term followup. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(5):503–507. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900515. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Dupont JY. Synovial plicae of the knee. Controversies and review. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16(1):87–122. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70009-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Farcas C, Hargital Z, Gaspar L, Kuki A, Csernatony Z, Szepesi K. Histological changes in the symptomatic mediopatellar plica. Knee Apr. 2004;11(2):103–108. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00143-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Hardaker WT, Whipple TL, Bassett FH. Diagnosis and treatment of the plica syndrome of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(2):221–225. [PubMed]
10. Iino S. Normal arthroscopic finding of the knee joint in adult cadavers. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1939;14:467–523.
11. Jee WH, Choe BY, Kim JM, Song HH, Choi KH. The plica syndrome: diagnostic value of MRI with arthroscopic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(5):814–818. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199809000-00028. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Johnson DP, Eastwood DM, Witherow PJ. Symptomatic synovial plicae of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(10):1485–1496. [PubMed]
13. Jouanin T, Dupont JY, Halimi P, Lassau JP. The synovial folds of the knee joint: anatomical study based on the dissection of 200 knee joints. Surg Radiol Anat. 1982;4(1):47–53.
14. Kim SJ, Choe WS. Arthroscopic findings of the synovial plicae of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(1):33–41. [PubMed]
15. Lyu SR, Hsu CC. Medial plicae and degeneration of the medial femoral condyle. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(1):17–26. [PubMed]
16. Matsusue Y, Yamamuro T, Hama H, Kuzuoka K, Ueo T, Thomson N. Symptomatic type D (separated) medial plica: clinical features and surgical results. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(3):281–285. [PubMed]
17. Nottage WM, Sprague NF, Auerbach BJ, 3rd, Shahriaree H. The medial patellar plica syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(4):211–214. doi: 10.1177/036354658301100405. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. O’Connor RL, Nottage WM. The synovial folds plicae of the knee. In: Shahriaree H, editor. O’Connor’s textbook of arthroscopic surgery. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1992. pp. 201–209.
19. O’Dwyer KJ, Peace PK. The plica syndrome. Injury. 1988;19(5):350–352. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90111-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Ogata S, Uhthoff HK. The development of synovial plicae in human knee joints: an embryologic study. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):315–321. [PubMed]
21. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B:752–757. [PubMed]
22. Patel D. Plica as a cause of anterior knee pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986;17(2):273–277. [PubMed]
23. Rovere GD, Adair DM. Medial synovial shelf plica syndrome. Treatment by intraplical steroid injection. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(6):382–386. doi: 10.1177/036354658501300603. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Sakakibara J. Arthroscopic study on lino’s band (plica synovia is mediopatellaris) J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1976;50:513–522.
25. Vaughan-Lane T, Dandy DJ. The synovial shelf syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(4):475–476. [PubMed]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag