We have previously shown that SigA influences a central pathogenic property of
M. tuberculosis, namely, the ability to multiply in human monocytes (
Wu et al., 2004). Our study suggests that this effect of SigA is mediated in part through the
eis gene. We found a strong correlation between upregulation of
sigA and high expression levels of
eis in transformants and wild-type strains, and showed that SigA binds the
eis promoter in live
M. tuberculosis. Deletion of
eis reduced the capacity of
M. tuberculosis to replicate in monocytes, and this defect was restored by complementation with
eis. These findings indicate that SigA regulates expression of
eis, which contributes to the pathogenicity of
M. tuberculosis.
Understanding the mechanisms by which increasing levels of Eis affect intracellular growth requires further investigation, but the differences in expression levels may have clinical significance. In this study, we found that, during growth in monocytes,
eis is expressed at higher levels in TB294 than in H37Rv, and this may contribute to the greater intracellular growth of this isolate (
Wu et al., 2004). It has also been reported that a clinical
M. tuberculosis isolate upregulates expression of
eis in activated human macrophages, whereas H37Rv does not (
Cappelli et al., 2001). In contrast to our findings that deletion of
eis results in reduced growth of TB294 in monocytes, another study found that an
eis deletion mutant of H37Rv has no growth defect in the macrophage-like cell line U937 (
Samuel et al., 2007). However, as expression of
eis is already reduced in H37Rv, compared with TB294, during infection (Fig. 2b), it may be that further reducing its expression has little effect on host-cell interactions. Recent studies suggest that the effects of a particular gene on the host response can depend upon the background strain (
Sinsimer et al., 2008). In addition, U937 cells are relatively undifferentiated monocytoid cells, whereas the MonoMac6 cells used in the current study are more differentiated and closer in phenotype to primary human monocytes. These distinctions may result in different responses to the effects of Eis.
A role for
eis in the survival of mycobacteria in monocytes/macrophages was first recognized by Friedman and colleagues, who used an H37Rv plasmid library to identify genes that could enhance survival of
M. smegmatis in U937 cells (
Wei et al., 2000).
M. smegmatis clones transformed with a plasmid containing the
eis gene showed approximately two- to fivefold greater survival than other clones. On the basis of Southern blot analysis, the same study concluded that
M. smegmatis did not contain a native
eis gene, and suggested that
eis may be present only in pathogenic mycobacteria. However, recently available genomic sequence data (
www.tigr.org) indicate that the
M. smegmatis genome contains a homologue (gene MSMEG_3513) encoding a protein with 58

% amino acid identity to Eis. In addition to the
M. smegmatis gene, a search against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database (
http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), using the
blastp program (
Altschul et al., 1997), revealed that the environmental mycobacteria
Mycobacterium gilvum and
Mycobacterium vanbaalenii also contain genes encoding proteins with >50

% amino acid identity to Eis. It is possible that Eis of
M. tuberculosis has functions lacked by the homologous genes. Eis is a member of the GNAT superfamily of acetyltransferases (
Samuel et al., 2007), and although there are some conserved motifs within these enzymes, they also have extensive sequence variation and a broad array of roles (
Vetting et al., 2005). Comparative analyses of the mycobacterial orthologues may give insights into the regions of the
M. tuberculosis gene that are important in host–pathogen interactions, and shed light on the function of
M. tuberculosis Eis. Alternatively, it is possible that the mycobacterial enzymes have similar functions, but that the native gene of
M. smegmatis is only expressed at low levels during intracellular growth, and that, in the original study (
Wei et al., 2000), this deficiency was overcome by overexpression of
eis from the plasmid clone.
Because Eis contributes to intracellular mycobacterial growth and
eis expression varies in different strains, it is important to identify the factors that regulate
eis expression. Our analyses indicate a direct correlation between upregulation of SigA and activation of
eis. In addition, we showed that SigA binds the
eis promoter, consistent with an analysis of the
eis promoter region that found that the −10 and −35 regions were similar to those of the
E. coli σ70 consensus sequence (
Roberts et al., 2004). However, it is not clear that the
eis promoter is itself especially sensitive to SigA-RNA polymerase levels such that the upregulation would result directly from an increase in the availability of the holoenzyme for promoter binding. Changes in sigma factor levels affect the competition between the sigma factors for core RNA polymerase, and therefore can markedly affect gene activation, particularly at weak promoters, but these effects may be mediated through other transcriptional regulators (
Bernardo et al., 2006;
Farewell et al., 1998;
Grigorova et al., 2006;
King et al., 2004;
Shah & Wolf, 2004;
Typas et al., 2007). It may be that a transcriptional activator of
eis is the direct beneficiary of increased amounts of SigA-RNA polymerase and that upregulation of the activator aids in recruitment or stabilization of the holoenzyme at the
eis promoter. For example, evidence indicates that SigA regulates expression of some virulence genes through interaction with the transcription factor WhiB3 (
Steyn et al., 2002). Mutational analyses of the
eis promoter show that sequences upstream of the −35 region are required for optimal expression of a reporter gene in mycobacteria (
Roberts et al., 2004), suggesting that as yet unidentified transcriptional activators contribute to
eis expression.
In addition to
eis and the adjacent gene Rv2415c, 19 other genes were expressed at higher levels in TB294-pSigA than in TB294-pCV during growth in monocytes (Supplementary Table S1). Given that SigA is the principal sigma factor, we had anticipated that a larger number of genes would show increased expression. However, as discussed above, not all target genes will be equally affected by changes in levels of a sigma factor. Moreover,
sigA is already expressed at higher levels in TB294-pCV than in H37Rv during infection (
Wu et al., 2004), so the sensitivity of some target genes to further increases in SigA levels may be diminished. We did, however, identify at least two other genes besides
eis that may contribute to the enhanced capacity of TB294-pSigA to grow in monocytes. Rv0986 is associated with host–pathogen interactions (
Be et al., 2008;
Jain et al., 2006;
Rosas-Magallanes et al., 2007;
Talaat et al., 2004) and was upregulated by approximately 2.5-fold, and
nuoK (Rv3155), which encodes a subunit of a NADH dehydrogenase involved in inhibition of apoptosis (
Velmurugan et al., 2007), was also upregulated (Supplementary Table S1).
Another intriguing discovery was that of the 56 genes with lower expression in TB294-pSigA, 37 are predicted to be regulated by a RecA-NDp promoter, or are clustered with another gene regulated by this type of promoter (Supplementary Table S2). These genes include the DNA repair genes
recA,
recX,
radA,
ogt and
alkA. The RecA non-dependent promoter (RecA-NDp) motif was identified upstream of genes that are activated in response to DNA damage, independently of RecA and LexA (
Gamulin et al., 2004). Most DNA repair genes in
M. tuberculosis that are induced by DNA damage are regulated independently of RecA (
Rand et al., 2003), and promoter sequences containing the RecA-NDp motif have been shown to be required for the RecA-independent induction of
recA itself and Rv2719c (
Brooks et al., 2006;
Davis et al., 2002;
Gopaul et al., 2003), both of which are expressed at lower levels in TB294-pSigA.
Rv3614c–Rv3620c was another notable group of genes expressed at a lower level in TB294-pSigA (Supplementary Table S2). These genes are components of the ESX-1 secretion system, which is primarily associated with mycobacterial virulence (
Fortune et al., 2005;
MacGurn et al., 2005;
Raghavan et al., 2008), although in
M. smegmatis, the ESX-1 system is also involved in DNA conjugation (
Coros et al., 2008;
Flint et al., 2004). The basis for the downregulation of the RecA-NDp and ESX-1 genes is unknown, but we speculate that these genes are regulated by an alternative sigma factor that is at a competitive disadvantage in the presence of increased levels of SigA, or has reduced expression in TB294-pSigA. Promoters for both
sigG and
sigH contain the RecA-NDp motif (
Gamulin et al., 2004), and additional evidence links
sigG to the DNA-damage response (
Lee et al., 2008). However,
sigH actually showed a slight increase in expression (1.5-fold) in TB294-pSigA (data not shown), and
sigG (Rv0182c) expression was below detectable levels in our array analysis, although its neighbouring genes (Rv0181c, Rv0184 and Rv0185) did have lower expression levels in TB294-pSigA (Supplementary Table S2). The association between upregulation of SigA and reduced expression of genes involved in the major DNA damage response therefore remains to be determined.
A complete understanding of the factors regulating expression of eis, and of sigA itself, during intracellular growth of the W-Beijing isolate TB294 also awaits further study, but our results provide further evidence of a significant role for both genes in host–pathogen interactions.