PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Psychiatr Serv. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2896812
NIHMSID: NIHMS197165

Subjective Burden and Personal Gains among Older Parents of Adults with Serious Mental Illness

Abstract

Objective

While numerous studies have examined the long-term toll of coping with an adult child’s serious mental illness, relatively few studies have examined both the subjective burden and personal gains associated with this parenting role. The purpose of this study is to investigate the stressors and resources related to burden and gains among older parents of adults with serious mental illness.

Methods

This study involves a secondary analysis of data collected in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. The analysis is based on 111 respondents who were identified as parents of adults with serious mental illness in the study. Regression analysis was used to examine the stressors and resources associated with parental burden and gains.

Results

Stressors that were positively associated with subjective burden included the amount of care provided to a child with serious mental illness and parent-child coresidence. Parents who received more assistance from an adult with serious mental illness and those who were support group members reported less subjective burden and more gains. A higher number of confidants was also positively associated with gains. Interestingly, parents who provided more assistance with activities of daily living to their adult child reported higher levels of gains.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that recovery-oriented approaches to supporting families in later stages of the life course may involve creating opportunities for adults with serious mental illness to play positive roles in the lives of aging parents and in helping older parents recognize ways in which successfully coping with caregiving challenges may lead to personal gains.

Introduction

Parenting a child with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, presents major lifelong challenges. To be sure, parents may provide decades of extended caregiving, especially during times when their adult son or daughter’s debilitating mental health symptoms produce ongoing obstacles to social and occupational functioning and independent living(1, 2). As parents age, they confront the dual stressor of having to cope with the challenges of having an adult child with serious mental illness while dealing with their own aging-related changes in health, such as physical disability and greater vulnerability to illness (35). In addition, older age is a stage in the life course when parents become increasingly concerned about the future care of their son or daughter with mental illness (6).

Prior studies have long focused on the substantial toll of caregiving (79). This body of research suggests that older parents of adults with serious mental illness experience, on average, high levels of burden and elevated health and mental health symptoms (10,11). The impact of caring for an adult child with serious mental illness is often framed in terms of subjective burden, which is conceptualized as the range of negative emotional reactions to caregiving (12,13).

While past research has mainly concentrated on the negative impact of parenting an adult child with serious mental illness in later-life, a more balanced perspective is one that recognizes the potential for personal growth associated with the caregiving role. Indeed, while later stages of the life course may involve unprecedented difficulties for parents of adults with serious mental illness, later-life may also present unique opportunities for positive parenting experiences, including personal growth and a greater awareness of family strengths (1416).

In contrast to burden, personal gains associated with caregiving correspond to the degree to which family members experience positive transformations as a result of coping with their relative’s mental illness (17). For instance, caring for a child with mental illness has led some parents to experience a deepening sense of self-awareness and inner strength (16). Parental caregivers have reported becoming stronger, more tolerant, less judgmental, and more sensitive and empathetic toward others (18). In addition to targeting caregiver distress, interventions have aimed to enhance caregiving experiences (19). Understanding the family’s experience of personal gains and the role of the adult with mental illness in contributing to these gains has taken on a new significance with efforts to transform the mental health system of care based on recovery principles.

A number of studies have focused on the relationship between the stressors of caregiving and parental well-being (20,21). One of the major challenges for parents of adults with serious mental illness is providing ongoing support with activities of daily living, often referred to as objective caregiving burden. The research on the relationship between the objective burden associated with providing hands-on care and supervision, and subjective burden is inconclusive. Whereas some researchers report that when persons with mental illness have a greater need for help with activities of daily living their caregivers report higher levels of subjective burden (22), others report only a weak relationship between the amount of assistance or supervision needed by the family member with mental illness and the caregiver’s experience of subjective burden (2325). Living with an adult child with serious mental illness may be especially challenging for older parents. In a longitudinal study of the end of coresident caregiving among aging mothers of adults with serious mental illness, Seltzer and colleagues (9) found that stress in the caregiving context is predictive of the end of coresidence and that mothers reported significantly lower levels of subjective burden following the adult child’s move out of the house.

Whereas subjective burden tends to be most associated with the demands of caregiving, personal gains appear to be associated with parental resources, in particular their level of social support. Indeed, research has begun to raise awareness of supportive resources that promote positive family experiences in serious mental illness (1517). Family members of persons with serious mental illness have demonstrated a pattern of coping in which they first turn to other family members and close friends for support, and then seek help from others with similar experiences (26). In addition to the benefits derived from confiding in a family member or close friend, seeking support from others who are facing similar challenges can foster mutually supportive environments that promote mastery and growth. Indeed, support group participation is positively associated with caregiving gains among families that care for a member with mental illness (17). Furthermore, adults with serious mental illness can themselves be a source of support to aging parents. Greenberg (27) found that when adults with schizophrenia are able to reciprocate through the provision of instrumental and expressive support, parents experienced less subjective burden.

In the present study, we first examine the factors associated with personal gains among older parents of adults with serious mental illness. We then examine the factors predictive of subjective burden, using the same sample of parents to examine both outcomes. Based on prior literature suggesting that personal gains are associated with parental resources (i.e., level of social support), whereas burden tends to be associated with stressors in the caregiving context, we hypothesize that parental stressors (e.g., child’s poorer health, greater parental care provided, and parent-child coresidence) will be most strongly associated with parental feelings of subjective burden, while parental resources (e.g., assistance from the child to parent, availability of confidants, and support group membership) will be most strongly related to personal gains, controlling for background characteristics (e.g., parent’s age, gender, and education, and child’s gender).

Methods

This study involves secondary analysis of data drawn from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) which is a random sample of over 10,317 Wisconsin high school graduates and their randomly selected siblings who have been followed for approximately 50 years (28, 29). The WLS sample was recruited prior to becoming parents, and thus independent of their child’s mental health diagnosis. Thus, this study does not suffer from the potential selection biases that arise in studies that have recruited participants after their child has developed a mental illness.

The WLS includes four waves of data collection: 1957, 1975, 1993, and 2003–2005 for the original respondents and 1977, 1994, and 2005–07 for their siblings. Respondents averaged age 18 in 1957, and at the subsequent points of data collection they averaged ages 36, 52–53, and 64–65, respectively. We chose to focus the present analysis on the fourth wave of WLS data collection, when the respondents were on average in their mid-60s, because a major aim of our study was to examine subjective burden and personal gains among older parents of adults with serious mental illness. At this fourth wave, respondents completed a 1-hour telephone survey and a self-administered questionnaire. Informed consent was obtained for all study participants. The institutional review board of the University of Wisconsin-Madison approved all the procedures for the protection of human subjects.

Participants

Based on a series of screening procedures in the telephone interview, we identified 196 graduate and sibling respondents who were parents of an adult with serious mental illness (i.e., bipolar disorder or schizophrenia) with whom they had telephone or face-to-face contact during the year prior to the interview. We excluded 34 parents because they did not return the extended mailed questionnaire for parents of adult children with disabilities from which the dependent variables in the present study were drawn. An additional 51 parents were excluded because they had missing data on key study variables. Thus, the present study is based on 111 parents of adults with serious mental illness. These 111 parents were compared with the 85 parents who were lost to attrition because of missing items in the telephone survey and/or the mail questionnaire. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to parental age, gender, marital status, or household income and the child’s age. However, parents in the present study were more likely to be parents of adult sons with serious mental illness as opposed to daughters than were the non-participants (χ2= 5.64, df= 1, p < .05).

The parents of the adult children with serious mental illness were, on average, 63.9±3.5 years of age, and 62% (N=69) were mothers. With regard to marital status, 69% (N=77) of the parents were married, while 19% (N=21) were divorced and 12% (N=13) were widowed. The majority (N=69, or 62%) had at least some college education, while 38% (N=42) earned a college degree. The median income for the parents was $46,248, reflecting the retirement status of most respondents.

The average age of the adults with serious mental illness was 37.7±5.8 years old. Forty-one percent were females (N=45), and only 23% (N=25) were married at the time of the survey. The majority of adult children had a primary mental health diagnosis of bipolar disorder (N=76, or 69%). They began having mental health problems when they were, on average, 18.1± 8.8 years old, and were diagnosed with serious mental illness at an average age of 22.5 ± 8.08. Almost three-quarters (N=80, or 72%) of the adults had at least weekly contact with their parents by telephone or in person, however, the vast majority (N=82, or 74%) lived in independent settings (i.e., apartments or houses). The characteristics of this sample are similar to those found in other studies of adults with serious mental illness (24,30).

Measurement

We examined two dependent variables: subjective burden and personal gains. Personal gains was assessed by a scale adapted from Pearlin (31), and used in a previous study of family caregiving in mental illness (17). The scale comprises 10-items that asses the degree to which respondents experienced positive change as a result of coping with their child’s mental illness (e.g., How much have you gotten a better idea of what is important in life?; How much have you become aware of your inner strengths?). For each item, respondents indicated on a four-point Likert scale (0 = not at all to 3 = a lot). Individual items were summed to obtain a personal gains score, with higher scores indicating more personal gains (α= .95).

Subjective burden was measured by the Zarit Burden Interview (32), a measure derived from studies on the impact on families of caring for adults with mental disorders living in the community (33, 34), and since used in numerous studies to assess the caregiver’s perception about or appraisal of the burdens associated with the caregiving role (e.g., time demands, financial strains, lack of privacy, adverse health consequences) (9,10,35). Each of the 29 items is answered using a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 = not at all true to 2 = extremely true. Individual items were summed to derive a total score, with higher scores indicating greater burden (α = .87).

Parental Stressors

This study measured three potential stressors associated with characteristics of the adult child with serious mental illness. First, parents rated their child’s overall health on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = very poor to 5 = excellent. Second, parents reported on a four-point Likert scale (0 = none to 3 = a lot) the extent to which their child needed help in eight activities of daily living (e.g., preparing meals, transportation, money management, and help taking medications). For those tasks for which the adult needed help, a follow-up question asked if the parent helped with the task. The amount of parental help provided was a count of the number of daily living tasks that the parent reported providing assistance. Since few parents helped with more than three activities of daily living, each respondent was categorized as either providing: (0) no help with tasks of daily living; (1) helping with one task of daily living; (2) helping with two tasks; (3) or helping with three or more tasks. Finally, parent-child coresidence was measured by a single item indicating whether the adult lived with his or her parent (0 = living apart and 1 = coresiding).

Resources

Three measures of social support were included as indicators of parental resources. The child’s contributions to the parent’s life was adapted from the patient contribution module of The Family Burden Interview Schedule (36). Using a four point Likert scale (0 = not at all to 3 = a lot), respondents indicated how much assistance their adult child with mental illness provided to them during the past 30 days in nine areas, such as preparing meals/household chores, listening to problems and providing advice, and providing companionship. Items were summed and a mean computed to derive a total score, with higher scores indicating that the adult provided a greater degree of help to their aging parent (α = .90). Confidants was measured by summing two items in which the respondent indicated whether he or she has a family member or friend in whom they could share private feelings and concerns (0 = no confidants; 1 = one confidant; 2 = two confidants), with higher scores indicating more confidants. Finally, parents were asked to indicate whether they were members of a support group (1 = members and 0 = non-members).

Three background characteristics were included as control variables: the parent’s gender (0 = female and 1 = male), education (0 = some college; 1 = college graduate), and age, measured as a continuous variable, and the child’s gender (0 = female and 1 = male).

Analysis

Bivariate correlations were computed with the Pearson r-product moment correlation coefficient to examine the intercorrelations between the study independent variables (i.e., background characteristics, parental stressors and resources) and dependent variables (i.e., subjective burden and personal gains). To test our primary hypotheses, we ran two separate multiple regression analyses with subjective burden and personal gains as the dependent variables. Analyses were calculated using the SPSS software, version 17 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Given the relatively small sample size and large number of predictors, preliminary analyses were conducted to reduce the number of independent variables in the model. Since the background characteristics were conceptualized as control variables and not significantly correlated with the dependent variables, and dropping them from the model did not substantively change the findings, they were excluded from the final regression models.

Results

Table 1 reports the correlations between the measures of parental stressors and resources and subjective burden and personal gains. As shown in Table 1, the child’s contributions, number of confidants, and support group membership were each positively and significantly correlated with personal gains. Also, parents who provided more help to their child with mental illness reported more gains than parents who were less involved in helping their child. Interestingly, the amount of help the parent provided was significantly correlated with the amount of assistance the child provided to the parent, suggesting reciprocity in the relationships. Parental reports of better overall child health and support group membership were significantly correlated with lower levels of subjective burden, whereas the amount of parental help was significantly correlated with higher subjective burden. There was no significant correlation between subjective burden and personal gains.

Table 1
Pearson product-moment correlations of parental stressors, resources, personal gains and subjective burden

The Effect of Stressors and Resources on Personal Gains

The results of the regression analysis are shown on Table 2. The overall regression model accounted for 32 % of the variance in personal gains (F= 8.20, df = 6 and 104, p < .001). Consistent with the bivariate relationships, parents who provided more assistance to their child with daily tasks experienced higher levels of gains than those who were less involved in assisting their child.

Table 2
Regression Results for Personal Gains and Subjective Burdena

In terms resources, parents who reported their adult child with mental illness provided more assistance to them (i.e., providing help with chores or providing emotional support) experienced higher levels of personal gains. Consistent with our expectations, having more confidants was significantly associated with experiencing a higher level of personal gains. Finally, parents who participated in a support group reported significantly higher levels of gains.

The Effect of Stressors and Resources on Subjective Burden

As shown in Table 2, the overall regression model accounts for 21% of the variance in subjective burden (F= 4.64, df = 6 and 104, p < .001). Among the parental stressors, parents who provided help to their adult child with a greater of number of daily living tasks reported significantly higher levels of subjective burden. There was a trend for parents who lived with their child to report higher levels of subjective burden than parents who lived apart. In terms of resources, the child’s contributions to the parent’s life were negatively and significantly associated with subjective burden. Parents reported lower levels of subjective burden when their adult child provided higher levels of instrumental and emotional support. Parents who were members of support groups, such as NAMI reported, on average, lower levels of subjective burden.

Discussion

In the present study we identified factors associated with subjective burden and personal gains among older parents of adults with serious mental illness. The stressors that were positively associated with subjective burden included the amount of help the parent provided to the child with activities of daily living, often referred to as objective burden, and parent-child coresidence. These findings are consistent with past research (9,22), and they underscore the potential lifelong challenges of coping with a child’s mental illness. However, findings from this study also contribute to the growing evidence of the role of adults with serious mental illness as a source of support to their aging parents. The adult’s contributions to their aging parent’s life appeared to be particularly important in reducing burden and increasing gains. Receiving help from an adult child with serious mental illness may not only be an important source of tangible support for aging parents, but may also serve to promote personal gains as parents witness their child with mental illness assume increasing role responsibility within the family. Furthermore, the positive and significant association between the amount of help the parent provided to the child and the amount of support the adult child provided to the parent suggests a degree of reciprocity in the relationships between aging parents and their adult child with mental illness that has rarely been discussed in the literature. It may be especially rewarding for older parents when reciprocal relationships are formed with adult children with serious mental illness who showed little capacity to reciprocate during earlier stages of their illness.

Findings from this study have implications for recovery-oriented services that strive to improve the self-efficacy and self-esteem of persons with serious mental illness as well as enhance the coping abilities of family members. According to Anthony (37), recovery is a way of living a satisfying, hopeful, and contributing life beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness. Gingerich and Mueser (38) assert that families often play a critical role in supporting persons with serious mental illness in the process of recovery. Thus, mental health interventions that facilitate reciprocity between persons with serious mental illness and their family members may serve the dual purpose of helping persons with serious mental illness engage in meaningful life activities, while at the same time reducing feelings of subjective burden and promoting feelings of personal growth among the family members who care for them.

The finding that support group membership is positively related to personal gains and negatively related to subjective burden emphasizes their value for older parents of adults with serious mental illness. Participation in support groups (such as NAMI) through education and mutual support encourage parents to become advocates for their loved one, fight the stigma of mental illness, and take on various leadership roles. Thus, it is not unexpected that family members who participated in support groups would report greater personal gains (e.g., learning new skills, developing a greater inner strength, developing new friendships). Also, support groups provide a forum for sharing their child’s journey of recovery from mental illness, which may help parents become more aware of their own growth and development through their personal journey in coping with their child’s illness.

One of the unexpected findings in this study was the positive association between the amount of help the parent provided, often referred to as objective burden, and the parent’s perceptions of personal gains. To our knowledge, the relationship between objective caregiving burdens and personal gains among parents of adults with serious mental illness has not been examined in prior research. One plausible explanation for these findings is that the very stressors that tax parental caregivers may paradoxically challenge them to develop additional internal and external resources if they are to cope successfully. This is in line with the concept of stress-related growth which refers to the positive life changes that people make as a result of their struggles to cope with negative events and adverse situations (3942). High levels of stress-related growth characterized by improved relationships with family and friends, a clearer sense of one’s own strengths and resilience, and changed priorities and values have been documented among people facing a variety of stressful situations, including health problems (e.g., heart attacks, cancer), sexual assault, and bereavement (43). There are emerging qualitative reports of family members of persons with serious mental illness who indicate that giving care increased their feelings of resilience, improved their sense of self-worth, enhanced coping effectiveness, and provided them with a greater sense of purpose in life (18,44,45). As Diane Marsh and colleagues (16) point out, many families emerge from coping with the challenges of caregiving with a renewed sense of resiliency and personal strength. This may be especially true for older parents who may have adapted to caregiving challenges over time by acquiring the resources and skills needed to cope effectively with their child’s mental illness.

Limitations

Our study had a few limitations. Although the design of the WLS circumvents many limitations associated with self-selected samples, there are two ways in which the initial recruitment procedures of the WLS might affect the generalizability of our findings. First, the racial composition of the WLS (99% white) reflects the composition of the Wisconsin population in the 1950s. Second, because all of the graduate respondents and the vast majority of sibling recruits (93%) completed high school, they were better educated than the general population of Wisconsin 18-year olds in the 1950s, as 25% of 18 year olds in Wisconsin at that time did not complete high school. In addition, parents of children with disabilities completed the supplemental interview and self-administered questionnaire on their caregiving experience only if they had at least one telephone or face-to-face contact with their child in the year prior to the interview. Ninety-one (91%) of the respondents had at least monthly telephone or face-to-face contact with their son or daughter with mental illness, and 53% had contact at least several times a week. Thus, although there was considerable variability in the frequency and type of contact between the parents and their child with mental illness, the generalizability of study findings are limited to those parents who continue to be involved in the life of their adult child with serious mental illness. Another study limitation is the use of parental reports of a child’s diagnosis. It is possible that parents may have underreported the incidence of mental illness in their children due to the stigma associated with a mental illness diagnoses. Our sample was limited to those who self-identified as a parent of an adult with serious mental illness which we confirmed through an extensive set of follow-up questions.

Nevertheless, the randomly selected community-based sample is a major strength of this study. In addition, the study sample of parents in their mid-60s provides a rare opportunity to examine the subjective burden and personal gains experienced by parents of adults with serious mental illness in later stages of the life course. Future replications of this research should include larger samples of older parents with varying degrees and types of contact with their adult children with serious mental illness to further investigate the heterogeneity in the experience of burden and gains among this unique group of parents.

Conclusions

To-date there has been less research attention given to the experiences of older families coping with the challenges of serious mental illness and only a small number of evidence-based interventions in the published literature specialize in supporting aging parents of adults with serious mental illness. However, families, in particular older parents, often provide a critical safety net of community support to adults with serious mental illness which may become compromised as parents grow older (46,47). Empirical evidence about the strengths and vulnerabilities of families coping with serious mental illness in later life is needed to inform recovery-oriented services that can address the needs of older families.

Acknowledgments

Support for preparation of this paper was provided by grants from the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG20558, P01 AG21079), the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH65185), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30 HD03352), and the Agency for Health Care Quality and Research (T32HS000011).

Footnotes

Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Social Work and Research, New Orleans, LA. (January 2009).

Disclosures: None for any author

References

1. Mueser KT, McGurk SR. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2004;363:2063–2072. [PubMed]
2. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, et al. Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62:1322–1330. [PubMed]
3. Biegel DE, Schulz R. Caregiving and caregiver interventions in aging and mental illness. Family Relations. 1999;48:345–354.
4. Hooyman NR, Kiyak HA. Social Gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective. 5. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1999.
5. Lefley HP. In: Changing caregiver needs as persons with schizophrenia grow older in Schizophrenia into later life: Treatment, research, and policy. Cohen Carl., editor. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2003.
6. Hatfield AB, Lefley HP. Future involvement of siblings in the lives of persons with mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal. 2005;41:327–338. [PubMed]
7. Cook JA, Cohler BJ, Pickett SA, et al. Life-course and severe mental illness: Implications for caregiving within the family of later-life. Family Relations. 1997;46:427–436.
8. Pickett SA, Greenley JR, Greenberg JS. Off-timedness as a contributor to subjective burdens for parents of offspring with severe mental illness. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family & Child Studies. 1995;44:195–201.
9. Seltzer MM, Greenberg JS, Kraus MW, et al. Predictors and outcomes of the end of co- resident caregiving in aging families of adults with mental retardation or mental illness. Family Relations. 1997;46:13–22.
10. Greenberg JS, Seltzer MM, Krauss MW, et al. The differential effects of social support on the psychological well-being of aging mothers of adults with mental illness or mental retardation. Family Relations. 1997;46:383–394.
11. Seltzer MM, Greenberg JS, Floyd FJ, et al. Life course impacts of parenting a child with a disability. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 2001;106:265–286. [PubMed]
12. Lefley HP, Johnson DL. Family interventions in mental illness: International perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group; 2002.
13. Murray-Swank AB, Lucksted A, Medoff DR, et al. Religiosity, psychosocial adjustment, and subjective burden of persons who care for those with mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:361–365. [PubMed]
14. Greenberg JS, Seltzer MM, Greenley JR. Aging parents of adults with disabilities: The gratifications and frustrations of later-life caregiving. The Gerontologist. 1993;33:542–550. [PubMed]
15. Greenberg JS, Seltzer MM, Judge K. Another side of the family’s experience: Learning and growing through the process of coping with mental illness. The Journal of the California Alliance for the Mentally Ill. 2000;11:8–10.
16. Marsh DT, Lefley HP, Evans-Rhodes DD, et al. The family experience of mental illness: Evidence for resilience. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1996;20:3–12.
17. Chen FP, Greenberg JS. A positive aspect of caregiving: The influence of social support on caregiving gains for family members of relatives with schizophrenia. Community Mental Health Journal. 2004;40:423–435. [PubMed]
18. Muhlbauer SA. Navigating the storm of mental illness: Phases in the family’s journey. Qualitative Health Research. 2002;12:1076–1092. [PubMed]
19. Pickett-Schenk SA, Bennett C, Cook JA, et al. Changes in caregiving satisfaction and information needs among relatives of adults with mental illness: Results of a randomized evaluation of a family-led education intervention. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2006;76:545–553. [PubMed]
20. Schulz B, Rössler W. Caregiver burden in mental illness: Review of measurement findings and interventions in 2004–2005. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2005;18:684–691. [PubMed]
21. Saunders JC. Families living with severe mental illness: A literature review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2003;24:175–198. [PubMed]
22. Stueve A, Vine P, Strueuning EL. Perceived burden among caregivers of adults with serious metnal illness:comparison of black, Hispanic, and white families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1997;67:199–209. [PubMed]
23. Cuijpers P, Stam H. Burnout among relatives of psychiatric patients attending psychoeducational support groups. Psychiatric Services. 2000;51:375–379. [PubMed]
24. Jones SL. The association between objective and subjective caregiver burden. Archives of Psychaitric Nursing. 1996;10:77–84. [PubMed]
25. Thompson EH, Doll W. The burden of families coping with the mentally ill: An invisible crisis. Family Relations. 31:379–388.
26. Chafetz L, Barnes L. Issues in psychiatric caregiving. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1989;3:61–68. [PubMed]
27. Greenberg JS. The other side of caregiving: Adult children with mental illness as supports to their mothers in late life. Social Work. 1995;40:414–423. [PubMed]
28. Hauser RM, Sewell WH, Logan JA, et al. The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study: Adults as parents and children 50 years later. Iassist Quarterly. 1992;16:23–38.
29. Hauser RM, Warren JR. Social stratification across three generations: New evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. American Sociological Review. 1997;62:561–572.
30. Nehra R, Chakrabarti S, Kulhara P. Caregiver coping in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: A re-examination. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2005;40:329–336. [PubMed]
31. Pearlin LI. Grant NIMH R01-MH42122. San Francisco: University of California, Human Development and Aging Programs; 1988. Caregiver’s Stress and Coping Study.
32. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist. 1980;20:649–655. [PubMed]
33. Sainsbury P, Grad de Alarcon J. The psychiatrist and the geriatric patient: The effects of community care on the family of the geriatric patient. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 1970;1:23–41. [PubMed]
34. Stephens MP, Kinney JM. Caregiver stress instruments: Assessment of content and measurement quality. Gerontology Review. 1989;2:40–54.
35. Magaña SM, García JI, Ramírez H. Psychological distress among Latino family caregivers of adults with schizophrenia: The roles of burden and stigma. Psychiatric Services. 2007;58:378–384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Tessler RC, Fisher GA, Gamache GM. The Family Burden Interview Schedule. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Social and Demographic Research Institute; 1992.
37. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 1993;16:11–23.
38. Gingerich S, Mueser KT. Family intervention for severe mental illness. In: Ronen T, Freeman A, editors. Cognitive behavior therapy in clinical social work practice. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; 2007.
39. Antoni M, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM. Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology. 2001;20:20–32. [PubMed]
40. Park CL, Cohen LH, Murch RL. Assessment and prediction of stress related growth. Journal of Personality. 1996;64:71–105. [PubMed]
41. Sears SR, Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S. The yellow brick road and the Emerald City: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping, and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2003;22:487–497. [PubMed]
42. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Expert companions: Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. In: Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, editors. Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006.
43. Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2004;17:11–21. [PubMed]
44. Sartorius N, Leff J, Lopez-Ibor JJ, et al. Families and mental disorders: From burden to empowerement. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005.
45. Stein CH, Mann LM, Hunt MG. Ever onward: The personal strivings of young adults coping with serious mental illness and the hopes of their parents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2007;77:104–112. [PubMed]
46. Cohler BJ, Pickett SA, Cook JA. The psychiatric patient grows older: Issues in family care. In: Light E, Lebowitz BD, editors. The Elderly with Chronic Mental Illness. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; 1991.
47. Lefley HP, Hatfield AB. Helping parental caregivers and mental health consumers cope with parental aging and loss. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:369–375. [PubMed]