Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Eur J Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2896503

Association of the +45T>G and +276G>T polymorphisms in the adiponectin gene with insulin resistance in nondiabetic Greek women



We explored potential associations of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ; +45T>G, rs2241766 and +276G>T, rs1501299) with circulating total and high-molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin, insulin resistance (IR), and markers of obesity in a healthy Greek female population.

Design and methods

The two SNPs were genotyped in 349 women without diabetes (mean age: 47.0±12.1 years, mean body mass index: 28.9±5.6 kg/m2). Total and HMW adiponectin concentrations, body composition variables, IR parameters, and plasma lipid levels were determined.


In single SNP analysis adjusting for several potential confounders, SNP +276G>T was associated with higher fasting insulin levels (P = 0.01) and higher homeostasis model assessment index for IR (HOMA-IR; P = 0.009), and SNP +45T>G was associated with lower insulin levels and HOMA-IR (P = 0.05 and P = 0.07 respectively). No association with total or HMW adiponectin, plasma lipid levels, and body composition variables was observed; however, haplotype analysis revealed that subjects homozygous for the most common +45T/+276G haplotype had lower total adiponectin levels than did noncarriers of this haplotype (P = 0.02). The observed differences in HOMA-IR were very significant among women with a higher body fat (BF) percentage (≥ the population median of 41%; all P ≤ 0.005), but not among leaner individuals (P for interactions 0.01–0.07), thus suggesting that ADIPOQ effects on insulin sensitivity may depend upon BF status.


Our data suggest a significant role of ADIPOQ variants at positions +45 and +276 in the development of IR in healthy Greek women possibly through an interaction with BF.


Adiponectin is specifically and abundantly expressed in adipocytes and circulates in the blood at high concentrations (1). The evidence from animal models and human studies supports an important role for adiponectin in the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome and most of its individual components, namely insulin resistance (IR), obesity, and dyslipidemia (2, 3). Concentrations of adiponectin are reduced in persons who are obese compared with lean individuals (4), and prospective studies have consistently found a decreased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with increasing concentrations of total adiponectin (57). Adiponectin circulates in plasma as a trimer, hexamer, and a high-molecular weight (HMW) form (4, 5). There is considerable evidence that the HMW multimer is the active form of the hormone and it has been proposed to be a better predictor of IR, metabolic syndrome, or cardiovascular disease (CVD) than total adiponectin (8, 9). Recently, it was shown that the ratio of HMW to total adiponectin is related to risk for T2DM independent of total adiponectin, suggesting an important role of the relative proportion of HMW adiponectin in diabetes pathogenesis (7).

Several adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been shown to influence adiponectin levels and have been associated with risk for obesity, IR, T2DM, and CVD (1017). Two of the most commonly studied SNPs at the ADIPOQ locus are a silent T to G substitution in exon 2 (+45T>G, rs2241766) and a G to T substitution in intron 2 (+276G>T, rs1501299). However, association studies of these two SNPs, either independently or as a haplotype, have resulted in conflicting evidence in different populations and sample types (18). Stumvoll et al. reported a positive association between the minor +45G allele of the +45T>G polymorphism and obesity traits in a healthy German population (11), whereas in Taiwanese non-diabetic subjects the same allele was related to a lower risk of obesity (19). Recently, the presence of the +45G allele was associated with increased risk of IR in a sample of Greek women with polycystic ovary syndrome (20) and a Spanish population (21), while in a Chinese/Japanese sample it was the +45T allele that presented such an association (19). The +276G allele has been associated either with increased or decreased levels of plasma total adiponectin in different Caucasian populations (22, 23), while this allele has been positively associated with obesity in Sweden (12), but not in Finland (24). Reverse associations with IR were also observed for SNP +276G>T in Italian (25) versus Japanese (8) and Polish populations (26). Haplotypes comprised of the two SNPs have also provided evidence of association with plasma total adiponectin levels, obesity, and IR phenotypes (10, 27, 28); however, little is known regarding the effect of these two SNPs on circulating HMW adiponectin, either independently or at the haplotypic level. So far, there is only one study evaluating the variation of HMW adiponectin levels according to SNP +276G>T genotypes in Japanese populations (29).

The aim of the present study was to examine the association of SNPs +45 and +276 in the ADIPOQ gene with markers of obesity, circulating total and HMW adiponectin concentrations, and IR parameters in a group of Greek women without diabetes.

Subjects and methods


A total of 379 Greek white women without a known history of diabetes, CVD, or cancer were enrolled in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Harokopio University. Data on general health status, smoking habits, and present medications, including hormone replacement and oral contraceptive treatment, were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Menstruation status was also recorded; women were classified as premenopausal if they had regular menses, perimenopausal if they were suffering from irregular menses, and postmenopausal if they had ceased menstruating for at least 12 months. After giving written informed consent to participate, subjects provided a fasting blood sample, and underwent anthropometric and body composition measurements. Fasting glucose concentrations >126 mg/dl, cortisol treatment, and lipid-lowering medication were criteria for exclusion from the analysis. Thus, our analysis was restricted to 349 apparently healthy women without diabetes. Of those, eight were on hormone replacement therapy and three reported regular use of oral contraceptives.

Anthropometry and body composition

Anthropometric and body composition measurements were performed with the subject wearing light clothing and without shoes. For all subjects, body weight and height were measured using a scale and a wall-mounted stadiometer to the nearest 0.5 kg and 0.5 cm respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was computed as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. Waist circumference (cm) was measured in the middle between the 12th rib and the iliac crest, and hip circumference (cm) was measured around the buttocks, at the level of the maximum extension. The waist-to-hip ratio was then calculated.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used as a reference method for the assessment of body composition. Soft tissue composition was determined using a DXA total body scanner (Model DPX+, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI, USA) and the Lunar software 4.7e. Anthropometric and body composition measurements were performed in all study participants by two trained investigators (L M and M K).

Biochemical analysis

Blood samples were drawn after a 12-h fast between 0830 and 1030 h, and plasma was immediately frozen in −80 °C until biochemical analysis. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were determined using commercially available enzymatic colorimetric assays (Alfa Wassermann BV, Woerden, The Netherlands) on an automated ACE analyzer (Schiapparelli Biosystems, Inc, Fairfield, New Jersey, USA). Within-batch coefficients of variation (CV) for the determination of these biochemical variables were all below 5%. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald equation (30). Apolipoprotein (apo)A1 and apoB were determined by turbidometry at 340 nm using a specific antiserum (Randox Laboratories Ltd, Crumlin, Co. Antrim, UK). Owing to insufficient plasma samples, apoA1 and apoB levels were not available for ten subjects.

Fasting plasma total adiponectin and insulin concentrations were measured by RIA as follows: adiponectin (Linco Research, St Charles, MO, USA; sensitivity, 1 ng/ml; intraassay CV, 1.78–6.21%); insulin (Diagnostics Systems Laboratory, Webster, TX, USA; sensitivity, 1.3 μIU/ml; intraassay CV, 4.5–8.3%). In addition, plasma levels of HMW adiponectin were determined in a subgroup of the study participants using a novel ELISA test (Human Multimeric Adiponectin ELISA; ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH, USA). The sensitivity of this assay was 0.05 ng/ml. IR was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) with the following formula: HOMA-IR = fasting insulin (μIU/ml)×fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5 (31).

Genotype determination

Genomic DNA was extracted from the buffy coat fraction of centrifuged blood using a standard salting-out procedure. Polymorphisms +45T>G (rs2241766) and +276G>T (rs1501299) were genotyped on a 7900HT Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using fluorescent allelic discrimination TaqMan assays. Genotyping was performed at the Laboratory of Nutrition and Genomics, JM-USDA-HNRCA at Tufts University, Boston. Because of PCR failure, genotypes could not be determined for seven individuals at position +45 and 15 individuals at position +276. Quality control evaluations were regularly taken for all laboratory procedures.

Statistical analysis

To test whether each of the SNPs was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and investigate the strength of pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs (expressed as D′), we used the Genetic Data Analysis software HelixTree (Golden Helix, Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA). This package was also used to estimate haplotype frequencies of the most common haplotypes (frequency >1%) using the expectation-maximization algorithm (32). Allele frequencies were determined with the gene counting method. All other statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software package (version 13.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Data were log transformed when necessary to approximate a normal distribution. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to describe associations of plasma total and HMW adiponectin, and HOMA-IR with anthropometric and blood measures. To evaluate the association between adiponectin gene polymorphisms (individually or as a haplotype) and continuous variables, we performed analysis-of-covariance (ANCOVA) using a general linear model with Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons. Multiple regression analysis was also applied where appropriate. Models were adjusted for the following potential confounders: age, estrogen use, smoking status, menopausal status, and percentage body fat (BF) or BMI. Both codominant and dominant models for the minor alleles were evaluated. The statistical homogeneity of the effects by BF categories was tested using interaction terms. All P values presented are two tailed and were considered significant if they were <0.05.


Sample characteristics and frequencies of +45T>G and +276G>T SNPs, and +45/+276 haplotypes

The general characteristics of the 349 Greek nondiabetic women participating in the study are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 47.0±12.1 years (range: 18–74 years), and the mean BMI was 28.9±5.6 kg/m2 (range: 18.5–47.7 kg/m2). A high proportion of women were overweight and obese (42.1 and 34.7% respectively).

Table 1
General characteristics of study participants (n = 349).

The genotype distributions of the +45T>G and +276G>T SNPs in the adiponectin gene were as follows: at position +45, 249 subjects (72.6%) had the common T/T genotype, 87 (25.4%) were T/G heterozygotes, and 7 (2.0%) were homozygous for the rare G allele (G allele frequency = 0.15). At position +276, 172 subjects (51.3%) were G/G, 136 (40.6%) were G/T, and 27 (8.1%) were T/T (T allele frequency = 0.28). Genotype distributions did not deviate from Hardy–Weinberg expectations for both +45T>G and +276G>T SNPs (P = 0.85 and P = 0.99 respectively). Strong pairwise LD was found between the two SNPs (D′ = −0.996, P<0.001, R2 = 0.256) with estimated +45/+276 haplotype frequencies of 0.57 for haplotype TG, 0.29 for TT, and 0.14 for GG.

Pearson correlation of plasma total, HMW adiponectin, and HOMA-IR with anthropometric and metabolic parameters

Plasma total and HMW adiponectin were highly correlated (r = 0.801, P<0.001). The associations of plasma total adiponectin, HMW adiponectin, and HOMA-IR with anthropometric and metabolic parameters were all in the expected directions (Table 2). Total and HMW adiponectin concentrations were negatively correlated with BMI, BF, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting triglyceride, glucose, and insulin concentrations, as well as with HOMA-IR. In addition, plasma total and HMW adiponectin were positively correlated with HDL cholesterol and apoA1 levels. HOMA-IR exhibited reverse correlation patterns with anthropometric parameters, plasma triglycerides and HDL cholesterol concentrations (Table 2).

Table 2
Pearson correlation of plasma total adiponectin, HMW adiponectin, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) with anthropometric and metabolic parameters.

Effect of +45T>G and +276G>T SNPs on anthropometric and metabolic parameters

There were no significant genotype-related differences in anthropometric parameters, plasma concentrations of glucose, triglyceride, total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol or plasma concentrations of total and HMW adiponectin at positions +45 or +276 (Table 3). Furthermore, the ratio of HMW to total adiponectin was not different across genotypes for the two SNPs (data not shown). However, in multivariate analysis controlling for the potential confounders such as age, estrogen use, menopausal status, smoking status, and BF content (or BMI), both SNPs showed evidence of association with fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance (Table 3). Carriers of the rare +45G allele (T/G+G/G subjects) exhibited lower levels of fasting insulin compared with T/T homozygotes (7.88±4.15 vs 8.89±4.76 μIU/ml, P = 0.02) and had lower HOMA-IR index (1.86±0.99 vs 2.12±1.23, P = 0.02). SNP +276G>T was also significantly associated with fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. Compared with G/G homozygotes, carriers of the +276T allele (G/T+T/T) had higher fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR index (9.40±5.32 vs 8.07±3.96 μIU/ml, P = 0.002, and 2.25±1.34 vs 1.90±1.00, P = 0.002 respectively). Further adjustment for alcohol consumption and physical activity level (data available for 290 women) resulted in similar findings (data not shown).

Table 3
Association of adiponectin +45T>G and +276G>T variants with plasma and anthropometric measures.

Effect of +45/+276 haplotypes on circulating adiponectin concentrations

Although single SNP analysis showed no significant associations with circulating adiponectin concentrations, a significant association with plasma total adiponectin was found at the haplotypic level (P = 0.03; Fig. 1). We divided our sample into three haplotype groups according to the most common haplotype TG: i) TG/TG group (homozygous TG haplotype, i.e. individuals who were T/T at position +45 and G/G at position +276), ii) TG/X group (heterozygous TG haplotype, TG/TT+TG/GG), and iii) X/X group (all other haplotypes, GG/GG+ GG/TT+TT/TT). Homozygous carriers of the TG haplotype exhibited lower plasma total adiponectin concentrations compared with noncarriers of this haplotype (X/X group; 13.71±7.12 vs 16.40 ±6.68 μg/ml, Bonferroni P value = 0.02, Fig. 1). A similar trend was observed for HMW adiponectin, albeit not statistically significant, whereas the ratio of HMW to total adiponectin was not different between the haplotype groups (data not shown). No significant haplotype effects on any other blood or anthropometric measures were observed (data not shown).

Figure 1
Total adiponectin concentrations according to carrying status of adiponectin +45T/+276G haplotype (n = 332). Bars represent mean values±S.E.M. P values adjusted for age, estrogen use, menopausal status, smoking status, and body fat. *P = 0.020 ...

Interaction between ADIPOQ gene SNPs and BF content on insulin resistance

In regression analysis and in ANCOVA, SNPs +45 and +276 did not show an independent role on HOMA-IR, with BF (expressed either as kg or percentage) being the strongest predictor of it (P<0.001), thus suggesting that the adiponectin gene may interact with BF in determining IR. The possible interaction between the adiponectin SNP genotypes and BF on IR was tested by subdividing the study group into two categories according to % BF (i.e. below or above the median value of 41% of the entire cohort). We found a significant interaction between BF (%) and genotype at position +45 for plasma insulin levels (P = 0.013) and HOMA-IR (P = 0.017), while an interaction of borderline significance between BF and genotype at position +276 was also observed for these IR parameters (P for both interactions = 0.07). As shown in Fig. 2, the observed differences in HOMA-IR according to SNP +45 and +276 genotypes were very significant among women with a higher BF content (≥41%), but not among leaner individuals. Specifically, only in the subgroup of women with BF≥41%, a significant association of the +45G allele with lower insulin levels (GG+TG: 8.71±5.22 versus TT: 10.70±5.54 μIU/ml, P = 0.003) and HOMA-IR index (GG+TG: 2.11±1.19 versus TT: 2.63±1.42, P = 0.005) was observed, as well as a significant association of the +276T allele with higher insulin levels (TT+GT: 11.55±6.50 versus GG: 9.23 ±4.43 μIU/ml, P = 0.002) and HOMA-IR (GG+TG: 2.84±1.60 versus TT: 2.24±1.10, P = 0.002). In contrast, no difference in HOMA-IR between ‘risk’ genotype carriers and noncarriers was observed within subjects with BF<41% (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Effect of adiponectin gene +45 and +276 SNP status on HOMA-IR index according to percentage body fat categories (% BF<41 versus % BF≥41). Bars represent mean values±S.E.M. P values adjusted for age, estrogen use, menopausal status, ...


In the present study, we assessed whether SNPs +45T>G (rs2241766) and +276G>T (rs1501299) in the ADIPOQ gene are associated with total and HMW adiponectin concentrations, metabolic parameters, measures of insulin sensitivity, and obesity in a healthy nondiabetic Greek women sample. Our findings provide evidence of an association between these two variants and IR. More precisely, a significant relationship between SNP +45 and IR was found, with +45G allele carriers exhibiting lower fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR index than T/T subjects. An adverse effect of T allele at position +276 on IR was also observed, as carriers of this allele exhibited higher fasting insulin levels and had higher HOMA-IR. Interestingly, these effects were significant only in the population-specific group of women with higher BF (≥41%), thus suggesting that the ADIPOQ gene effects on insulin sensitivity are dependent upon BF status.

SNPs +45T>G and +276G>T have been studied in several populations including Europeans, Asians, and Americans (1, 33). Although there is a lack of consistency among studies, the results indicate that genetic variation in the ADIPOQ gene is associated with IR and T2DM (8, 1012, 20, 25, 28, 34, 35). Moreover, the strong LD with T2DM, insulin levels, and metabolic syndrome, found in the chromosomal region where the ADIPOQ gene is located (36, 37), suggests that somewhere in this locus common genetic variant(s) may have a measurable effect on IR-related phenotypes. In accordance with the findings of the present study, Yang et al. (37) first reported lower insulin sensitivity for +45T allele in a Chinese and Japanese population, while in a Mediterranean population of Italy +276T allele was associated with higher insulin levels and HOMA-IR (24). However, other studies have provided opposite results (8, 11, 20, 28). In nondiabetic Germans, the +45G allele was associated with higher IR indexes (11), whereas in nondiabetic Korean, as well as in Japanese men, +276T allele was found to be protective for IR (association with lower HOMA-IR) (8, 28). These conflicting association results in various populations suggest a complex relationship between ADIPOQ gene variation and IR.

Because of the fact that SNP +45T>G is a synonymous mutation (GGT→GGG, Gly15Gly) at exon 2 and SNP +276G>T locates at intron 2, the exact molecular mechanisms responsible for the biological effects on IR cannot be elucidated so far. Yang et al. (19) showed that the silent +45T>G mutation may alter RNA splicing or stability, suggesting an allele-specific differential expression of adiponectin. This finding supports the fact that SNPs with no apparent biological significance may have an effect on gene expression, although it is very plausible for SNP +45 to be in LD with some other functional genetic alterations resulting in the difference in mRNA expression of its two alleles. SNP +276G>T could influence insulin sensitivity as it has been reported that intronic SNPs may modulate gene expression levels (38), although the influence on IR may simply reflect the LD between this SNP and a functional SNP for which it acts as a marker.

We could also speculate that different LD patterns among ethnic groups might be responsible for the variation of ADIPOQ SNPs in modulating IR, but conflicting results have been reported even between samples from the same ethnicity (10, 25). Another possible explanation could be the interaction between genotype and environmental factors such as diet and physical activity level. Different metabolic environments, including obesity and diabetic or prediabetic state, could affect the regulation of the ADIPOQ gene and the influence of SNPs within it. With regard to this notion, we found that the impact of ADIPOQ +45 and +276 variations on HOMA-IR index is dependent on the degree of obesity. It is possible that the contribution of these SNPs on IR is too small to be detected in lean subjects, but significant in more obese states where the risk of diabetes is greater. Our findings are in accordance with previously published data by Jang et al. (27) where the phenotypic expression of the ‘risk’ genotype for SNP +276G>T was observed only among subjects with elevated BMI. Moreover, in nondiabetic Korean women, the association of the +45T/+276G haplotype with IR parameters was significant only among the overweight/obese subgroup (17). However, in an Italian nondiabetic population, the greater IR observed among subjects with the at-risk TT genotype was more pronounced in lean compared with obese individuals of this study (25).

In the current study, a reasonable implication is that the genetic effect of SNPs +45 and +276 on IR is mediated through an alteration of gene expression that would eventually affect circulating adiponectin levels. Nevertheless, single SNP analysis did not reveal any significant association of SNPs +45 and +276 with plasma total adiponectin levels. This discrepancy has also been shown in other studies where both SNPs did relate to IR but not to total adiponectin concentrations (8, 28). A possible explanation is that current adiponectin assays fail to differentiate between types of circulating adiponectin, as not all the circulating forms may be functional (1); however, in our study, both total and HMW adiponectin, as well as the ratio of HMW to total adiponectin, were not different across the two SNP genotype groups. In addition, two genomic scans in northern European (39) and Pima Indian (40) populations have shown that the ADIPOQ gene has only a small effect on plasma adiponectin levels. Considering that the ADIPOQ variation at positions +45 and +276 does not affect plasma adiponectin levels, we cannot rule out the hypothesis that there might be an influence on adiponectin concentration at the hormone’s action sites, such as target tissues and mainly adipose tissue, through a local autocrine and/or paracrine effect. It is interesting that, while each SNP alone did not present any effect on plasma adiponectin concentrations in the SNP +45/+276 haplotype test, we found that homozygous carriers of the common TG haplotype had significantly lower concentration of plasma total adiponectin compared with noncarriers of this haplotype, although the ‘risk’ haplotype did not associate with other components of IR. Recently published data also support a lowering effect of TG haplotype on circulating levels of adiponectin (27, 41).

In conclusion, prior data on adiponectin SNPs and IR have been inconsistent. Data of the present study suggest a significant role of ADIPOQ variants at positions +45 and +276 in the development of IR in healthy Greek women possibly through an interaction with BF. Further studies are needed to directly assess the influence of these two common variants on ADIPOQ gene expression and the potential mechanism by which they modulate susceptibility to IR.



This work was partly supported by NIH grants HL54776 and DK075030, and contracts 53-K06-5-10 and 58-1950-9-001 from the US Department of Agriculture Research Service.


Declaration of interest

There is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.


1. Gable DR, Hurel SJ, Humphries SE. Adiponectin and its gene variants as risk factors for insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2006;188:231–244. [PubMed]
2. Whitehead JP, Richards AA, Hickman IJ, Macdonald GA, Prins JB. Adiponectin – a key adipokine in the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2006;8:264–280. [PubMed]
3. Sheng T, Yang K. Adiponectin and its association with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2008;35:321–326. [PubMed]
4. Oh DK, Ciaraldi T, Henry RR. Adiponectin in health and disease. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2007;9:282–289. [PubMed]
5. Ahima RS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Obesity. 2006;14:242S–249S. [PubMed]
6. Wannamethee SG, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Cherry L, Whincup PH, Sattar N. Adipokines and risk of type 2 diabetes in older men. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1200–1205. [PubMed]
7. Heidemann C, Sun Q, van Dam RM, Meigs JB, Zhang C, Tworoger SS, Mantzoros CS, Hu FB. Total and high-molecular-weight adiponectin and resistin in relation to the risk for type 2 diabetes in women. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;149:307–316. [PubMed]
8. Hara K, Boutin P, Mori Y, Tobe K, Dina C, Yasuda K, Yamauchi T, Otabe S, Okada T, Eto K, Kadowaki H, Hagura R, Akanuma Y, Yazaki Y, Nagai R, Taniyama M, Matsubara K, Yoda M, Nakano Y, Tomita M, Kimura S, Ito C, Froguel P, Kadowaki T. Genetic variation in the gene encoding adiponectin is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population. Diabetes. 2002;51:536–540. [PubMed]
9. von Eynatten M, Humpert PM, Bluemm A, Lepper PM, Hamann A, Allolio B, Nawroth PP, Bierhaus A, Dugi KA. High-molecular weight adiponectin is independently associated with the extent of coronary artery disease in men. Atherosclerosis. 2008;199:123–128. [PubMed]
10. Menzaghi C, Ercolino T, Di Paola R, Berg AH, Warram JH, Scherer PE, Trischitta V, Doria A. A haplotype at the adiponectin locus is associated with obesity and other features of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes. 2002;51:2306–2312. [PubMed]
11. Stumvoll M, Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Staiger H, Renn W, Weisser M, Machicao F, Haring H. Association of the T-G polymorphism in adiponectin (exon 2) with obesity and insulin sensitivity: interaction with family history of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:37–41. [PubMed]
12. Vasseur F, Helbecque N, Dina C, Lobbens S, Delannoy V, Gaget S, Boutin P, Vaxillaire M, Leprêtre F, Dupont S, Hara K, Clement K, Bihain B, Kadowaki T, Froguel P. Single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in the both proximal promoter and exon 3 of the APM1 gene modulate adipocyte-secreted adiponectin hormone levels and contribute to the genetic risk for type 2 diabetes in French Caucasians. Human Molecular Genetics. 2002;11:2607–2614. [PubMed]
13. Ukkola O, Ravussin E, Jacobson P, Sjostrom L, Bouchard C. Mutations in the adiponectin gene in lean and obese subjects from the Swedish obese subjects cohort. Metabolism. 2003;52:881–884. [PubMed]
14. Qi L, Doria A, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Hunter D, Mantzoros CS, Hu FB. Adiponectin genetic variability, plasma adiponectin, and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55:1512–1516. [PubMed]
15. Tankó LB, Siddiq A, Lecoeur C, Larsen PJ, Christiansen C, Walley A, Froguel P. ACDC/adiponectin and PPAR-gamma gene polymorphisms: implications for features of obesity. Obesity Research. 2005;13:2113–2121. [PubMed]
16. Yang WS, Chuang LM. Human genetics of adiponectin in the metabolic syndrome. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2006;84:112–121. [PubMed]
17. Jang Y, Chae JS, Koh SJ, Hyun YJ, Kim JY, Jeong YJ, Park S, Ahn CM, Lee JH. The influence of the adiponectin gene on adiponectin concentrations and parameters of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic Korean women. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2008;391:85–90. [PubMed]
18. Menzaghi C, Trischitta V, Doria A. Genetic influences of adiponectin on insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:1198–1209. [PubMed]
19. Yang WS, Tsou PL, Lee WJ, Tseng DL, Chen CL, Peng CC, Lee KC, Chen MJ, Huang CJ, Tai TY, Chuang LM. Allele-specific differential expression of a common adiponectin gene polymorphism related to obesity. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2003;81:428–434. [PubMed]
20. Xita N, Georgiou I, Chatzikyriakidou A, Vounatsou M, Papassotiriou GP, Papassotiriou I, Tsatsoulis A. Effect of adiponectin gene polymorphisms on circulating adiponectin and insulin resistance indexes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:416–423. [PubMed]
21. Gonzalez-Sanchez JL, Zabena CA, Martinez-Larrad MT, Fernandez-Perez C, Perez-Barba M, Laakso M, Serrano-Rios M. An SNP in the adiponectin gene is associated with decreased serum adiponectin levels and risk for impaired glucose tolerance. Obesity Research. 2005;13:807–812. [PubMed]
22. Filippi E, Sentinelli F, Romeo S, Arca M, Berni A, Tiberti C, Verrienti A, Fanelli M, Fallarino M, Sorropago G, Baroni MG. The adiponectin gene SNP+276G>T associates with early-onset coronary artery disease and with lower levels of adiponectin in younger coronary artery disease patients (age <or = 50 years) Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2005;83:711–719. [PubMed]
23. Kyriakou T, Collins LJ, Spencer-Jones NJ, Malcolm C, Wang X, Snieder H, Swaminathan R, Burling KA, Hart DJ, Spector TD, O’Dell SD. Adiponectin gene ADIPOQ SNP associations with serum adiponectin in two female populations and effects of SNPs on promoter activity. Journal of Human Genetics. 2008;53:718–727. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Salmenniemi U, Zacharova J, Ruotsalainen E, Vauhkonen I, Pihlajamaki J, Kainulainen S, Punnonen K, Laakso M. Association of adiponectin level and variants in the adiponectin gene with glucose metabolism, energy expenditure, and cytokines in offspring of type 2 diabetic patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005;90:4216–4223. [PubMed]
25. Filippi E, Sentinelli F, Trischitta V, Romeo S, Arca M, Leonetti F, Di Mario U, Baroni MG. Association of the human adiponectin gene and insulin resistance. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2004;12:199–205. [PubMed]
26. Szopa M, Malczewska-Malec M, Wilk B, Skupien J, Wolkow P, Malecki MT, Sieradzki J. Variants of the adiponectin gene and type 2 diabetes in a Polish population. Acta Diabetologica. 2009 doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0091-2. In Press. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Jang Y, Lee JH, Chae JS, Kim OY, Koh SJ, Kim JY, Cho H, Lee JE, Ordovas JM. Association of the 276G→T polymorphism of the adiponectin gene with cardiovascular disease risk factors in nondiabetic Koreans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;82:760–767. [PubMed]
28. Jang Y, Lee JH, Kim OY, Koh SJ, Chae JS, Woo JH, Cho H, Lee JE, Ordovas JM. The SNP276G>T polymorphism in the adiponectin (ACDC) gene is more strongly associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease risk than SNP45T>G in nonobese/nondiabetic Korean men independent of abdominal adiposity and circulating plasma adiponectin. Metabolism. 2006;55:59–66. [PubMed]
29. Ishibashi K, Takamura N, Aoyagi K, Yamasaki H, Abiru N, Nakazato M, Kamihira S, Maeda T. Multimers and adiponectin gene 276G>T polymorphism in the Japanese population residing in rural areas. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2007;45:1457–1463. [PubMed]
30. Gonzalez Estrada M, Rodriguez Ferrer CR, Astarloa IR, Lahera EM. Use of serum cholesterol/triglyceride ratio to discern for which individuals the Friedewald formula can be used confidently. Clinical Chemistry. 1990;36:1673–1675. [PubMed]
31. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. [PubMed]
32. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1995;12:921–927. [PubMed]
33. Vasseur F, Meyre D, Froguel P. Adiponectin, type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: lessons from human genetic studies. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine. 2006;8:1–12. [PubMed]
34. Hu FB, Doria A, Li T, Meigs JB, Liu S, Memisoglu A, Hunter D, Manson JE. Genetic variation at the adiponectin locus and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes. 2004;53:209–213. [PubMed]
35. Richardson DK, Schneider J, Fourcaudot MJ, Rodriguez LM, Arya R, Dyer TD, Almasy L, Blangero J, Stern MP, Defronzo RA, Duggirala R, Jenkinson CP. Association between variants in the genes for adiponectin and its receptors with insulin resistance syndrome (IRS)-related phenotypes in Mexican Americans. Diabetologia. 2006;49:2317–2328. [PubMed]
36. Kissebah AH, Sonnenberg GE, Myklebust J, Goldstein M, Broman K, James RG, Marks JA, Krakower GR, Jacob HJ, Weber J, Martin L, Blangero J, Comuzzie AG. Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and 17 influence phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome. PNAS. 2000;97:14478–14483. [PubMed]
37. Vionnet N, Hani EH, Dupont S, Gallina S, Francke S, Dotte S, De Matos F, Durand E, Leprêtre F, Lecoeur C, Gallina P, Zekiri L, Dina C, Froguel P. Genomewide search for type 2 diabetes-susceptibility genes in French whites: evidence for a novel susceptibility locus for early-onset diabetes on chromosome 3q27-qter and independent replication of a type 2-diabetes locus on chromosome 1q21–q24. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2000;67:1470–1480. [PubMed]
38. Horikawa Y, Oda N, Cox NJ, Li X, Orho-Melander M, Hara M, Hinokio Y, Lindner TH, Mashima H, Schwarz PE, del Bosque-Plata L, Horikawa Y, Oda Y, Yoshiuchi I, Colilla S, Polonsky KS, Wei S, Concannon P, Iwasaki N, Schulze J, Baier LJ, Bogardus C, Groop L, Boerwinkle E, Hanis CL, Bell GI. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nature Genetics. 2000;26:163–175. [PubMed]
39. Comuzzie AG, Funahashi T, Sonnenberg G, Martin LJ, Jacob HJ, Black AE, Maas D, Takahashi M, Kihara S, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, Blangero J, Cohen D, Kissebah A. The genetic basis of plasma variation in adiponectin, a global endophenotype for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001;86:4321–4325. [PubMed]
40. Lindsay RS, Funahashi T, Krakoff J, Matsuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Kobes S, Bennett PH, Tataranni PA, Knowler WC, Hanson RL. Genome-wide linkage analysis of serum adiponectin in the Pima Indian population. Diabetes. 2003;52:2419–2425. [PubMed]
41. Shin MJ, Jang Y, Koh SJ, Chae JS, Kim OY, Lee JE, Ordovas JM, Lee JH. The association of SNP276G>T at adiponectin gene with circulating adiponectin and insulin resistance in response to mild weight loss. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30:1702–1708. [PubMed]