The task of investigating brain functions and networks is conventionally explored with studies of brain responses to carefully controlled sensory, cognitive and motor events. These responses can be measured and mapped using neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using the hemodynamic processes spatially associated with locally elevated neuronal activities. However, one major challenge of these methods is that it is difficult to determine intrinsic relations among distributed brain regions activated by designed external stimulations. This challenge has become a critical barrier to investigating selective brain networks sub-serving cognitive and emotional events.
Recently, a series of studies have demonstrated that patterned activities exist within various brain networks during resting and passive task states (
Gusnard et al., 2001b;
Fox et al., 2005). During these non-cognition-related states, distributed brain regions within functional-anatomic networks spontaneously increase and decrease their intrinsic activity together (
Fox et al., 2005). An important implication of this synchrony of intrinsic brain activity is its potential utilization in studies pertaining to functional connectivity within and across separate brain networks since spontaneous fluctuations of intrinsic activity from functionally-connected brain regions should be temporally correlated. Indeed, Biswal et al. first reported the correlation in fMRI signal fluctuations between the left and right motor cortices in the absence of any motor task (
Biswal et al., 1995). Subsequently, a large set of studies have found consistent connectivity in motor, auditory, visual and language areas (
Biswal et al., 1995;
Lowe et al., 1998;
Hampson et al., 2002). This method was later utilized by several groups to identify the connections between several brain regions referred to as default-mode network, which consistently shows higher intrinsic activities at rest (
Gusnard et al., 2001b;
Greicius et al., 2003;
Damoiseaux et al., 2006;
De Luca et al., 2006).
Besides the potential discovery of novel brain circuitries and networks, the intrinsic brain activity is tightly linked to a number of neurobiological behaviors and thus should lead to better understanding of neuronal mechanisms underlying these behaviors (
Fox and Raichle, 2007;
Fox et al., 2007). A recent study found that the spontaneous activities recorded from the hippocampus in navigating rats during the stopped periods contain structured patterns that echoed the sequential patterns that occurred when the rats were actively navigating, only much faster and in reverse order (
Foster and Wilson, 2006). This study indicates that resting-state intrinsic brain activity may be critical to understanding information gathering and processing (
Buckner and Vincent, 2007) and may constitute a general mechanism of learning and memory (
Foster and Wilson, 2006;
Albert et al., 2009). Additionally, it has been found that alterations of resting-state brain activity and networks are tightly linked to degenerative disease processes like that observed in Alzheimer’s disease (
Lustig et al., 2003;
Rombouts et al., 2005;
Tian et al., 2006;
Buckner and Vincent, 2007). Emergent data have further revealed differences in resting-state activity and networks in other disorders including autism (
Kennedy et al., 2006), depression (
Anand et al., 2005), multiple sclerosis (
Lowe et al., 2002), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (
Tian et al., 2006). Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that understanding intrinsic brain activity and functional connectivity at resting states has the potential to open a new avenue to uncover brain functions and brain networks in both normal and abnormal conditions.
To date, the vast majority of studies on intrinsic brain activity and resting-state functional connectivity are conducted on human subjects. Systematic investigations of this phenomenon in different animal models have been underexplored (
Leopold et al., 2003;
Lu et al., 2007;
Vincent et al., 2007;
Kannurpatti et al., 2008;
Pawela et al., 2008;
Zhao et al., 2008;
Kojima et al., 2009;
Majeed et al., 2009). This may be attributed largely to unknown effects of anesthetic agent used in most animal studies on functional connectivity between different brain regions. Although the anesthetized monkey study showed remarkable agreement with awake human studies (
Vincent et al., 2007), results from a recent study suggest that the functional connectivity in “default-mode” network is reduced even during conscious sedation (
Greicius et al., 2008). Moreover, Lu et al clearly demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease of cross-hemispheric functional connectivity in α-chloralose-anesthetized rats (
Lu et al., 2007). This result is in agreement with the study by Liu and colleagues who found that intrinsic BOLD fluctuations and functional connectivity in the resting rat were strongly dependent on anesthesia depth (
Liu et al., 2009). In human subjects, functional connectivity can be detected with light anesthesia but is completely ablated with deep anesthesia (
Peltier et al., 2005). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that anesthesia can be a potential confound in studying functional connectivity of animal models (
Massimini et al., 2005).
The confounding effects of anesthetics limit the full potential of investigating intrinsic brain activity and resting-state functional connectivity in various animal models. However, such ability is extremely important particularly in behavioral and cognitive neuroscience because it not only can provide invaluable information regarding cognitive and emotional tasks in animal models, but also may provide a unique window to explore comparative functional anatomy between species (
Buckner and Vincent, 2007) using translational models. Therefore, for the purpose of establishing functional connectivity studies in animal models, it is intriguing and vital to investigate intrinsic brain activity and functional connectivity in conscious animals. Technical challenges involved in imaging conscious animals in MR scanners include controlling for motion artifacts and minimizing stress induced by the scanning noise and environment. To resolve these issues, we have developed an animal model (
Ferris et al., 2006) through which animal motion and stress during MRI scanning are substantially minimized by using an entirely noninvasive system (
Lahti et al., 1998) and a routine acclimation procedure (
King et al., 2005) (See
Methods and Materials). This animal model allowed the brain activation in conscious animals to be reliably imaged using fMRI (
Lahti et al., 1999;
Ferris et al., 2001;
Brevard et al., 2003;
Sicard et al., 2003;
Tenney et al., 2004).
In the present study we have created resting-state functional connectivity maps from seed regions that are crucial to cognitive and emotional processing including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), thalamus and retrosplenium cortex in the conscious rat. The results showed strong functional connectivity to cortical and subcortical areas from these seeds. The reliability of the functional connectivity maps obtained was validated by controlling for false positive detection of correlation, the physiologic basis of the signal source, as well as qualitatively and quantitatively evaluating the reproducibility of the maps.