About 1 in 10 live births is a preterm birth. This is an enormous public health issue since many of these preterm infants survive with neurocognitive, behavioral and motor disability (
Wood et al., 2005;
Marlow et al., 2005;
Costeloe, 2006;
Limperopoulos et al., 2007;
Lindstrom et al., 2009). The precise mechanisms behind neuronal injury and dysfunction after preterm birth have not been investigated. In this study, using mouse models, we examined whether preterm parturition in the presence or absence of intrauterine inflammation influences neuronal morphology. Our novel data demonstrate that inflammation-mediated preterm birth results in altered neuronal morphology in the fetus. In particular, we observed not only subjective findings of altered neuronal morphology but also the objective finding of a decrease in the number of dendrites. This may be a clinically important finding since dendrite morphology and plasticity likely represent the cellular response to learning and memory. Importantly, our results indicate that this neuronal injury is not from the process of parturition on an immature brain but rather from activation of inflammatory pathways.
A number of animal models have been developed to elucidate the mechanisms by which preterm birth promotes fetal brain injury (
Bell and Hallenbeck, 2002;
Debillon et al., 2003;
Elovitz and Mrinalini, 2004;
Wang et al., 2006,
2007). However, all of these models of preterm birth employ an inflammatory stimulus for labor induction. From these studies, it remains unclear whether inflammation in a preterm birth was an epiphenomena or truly necessary for the observed brain injury. By comparing a model of inflammation-induced preterm birth to a non-infectious preterm birth model, we were able to demonstrate that intrauterine inflammation is a critical and necessary for fetal brain injury and altered neuronal morphology in preterm birth. While these studies cannot determine if the inflammatory biomarkers or cytokines assessed are mechanistically involved, our results do indicate that inflammatory pathways are activated in the mother, fetus and fetal brain when neuronal injury is present. Whether activation of inflammatory pathways in any or all of these compartments is necessary and/or sufficient for fetal brain injury requires further investigation.
The use of an animal model has notable limitations for the study of any disease state. Yet, this line of research is neither practical nor feasible in human pregnancy. As prenatal inflammation confers a documented risk for adverse neurobehavioral disorders, animal models of this condition are tantamount to hopes of successful interventions. Mouse models to study parturition and inflammation-induced preterm parturition are well-established in the literature; the models used herein provide acceptable models for the study of the effects of inflammation and parturition on the fetal brain. Furthermore, the use of the rodent models to investigate neuronal injury in other neuroinflammatory disorders that afflict humans is well established (
Nguyen et al., 2004;
Walter et al., 2006;
Piazza and Lynch, 2009;
Cunningham et al., 2009). While the effect of inflammation-induced preterm birth on a immature brain has been studied by others (
Bell and Hallenbeck, 2002;
Debillon et al., 2003;
Elovitz and Mrinalini, 2004;
Wang et al., 2006,
2007), the focus for most of this work has been on unraveling the pathogenesis of white matter injury from prenatal inflammation. Until now, these models have not been utilized to explore the effect of prenatal inflammation on neuronal injury and morphology.
Recent studies demonstrate that ex-preterm infants have significant behavioral, social and learning disabilities throughout childhood and adolescence (
Marlow et al., 2005;
Wood et al., 2005;
Costeloe, 2006;
Limperopoulos et al., 2007;
Lindstrom et al., 2009). Yet, most of these infants do not have overt evidence of structural injury by radiological imaging (
Rademaker et al., 2005). These findings suggest that while overt injury (e.g. cystic periventricular leukomalacia) or even WMD may be sufficient for long-term adverse outcomes, neuronal injury may play a crucial role for observed adverse neurological outcomes in ex-preterm children. While our study does not rule out WMD as an etiology for these adverse outcomes, it does provide compelling evidence that neuronal injury may be responsible for the abnormal neuronal function and communication that is observed as these ex-preterm children mature. Furthermore, recent clinical evidence, using quantitative MRI, demonstrated volume loss in the cerebral cortex, thalamus and hippocampus in children surviving preterm birth (
Inder et al., 1999,
2005). This may suggest a more subtle cortical injury, such as neuronal loss or lack of dendritic arborization (
King et al., 2006). These clinical findings of neuronal rather than just glial involvement are consistent with our laboratory data and represent a novel way of conceptualizing brain damage associated with preterm birth.
In our experiments, we used three different control groups (control, saline and RU486). None of these controls demonstrated neuronal abnormalities which strengthens our findings that inflammation in preterm birth plays an essential role in neuronal injury. In particular we found that the number of dendritic processes was reduced in neurons harvested from LPS induced preterm birth. Since dendritic morphology has been demonstrated to be vital to normal neuronal information processing and allows the neuron to receive messages and permits cortical connectivity (
Whitford et al., 2002), our findings suggest that this damage may lead to long-term adverse neurological outcomes by modulating communication between neurons and other neurons, or neurons and glia. Furthermore, we observed a decrease in MAP2 staining in LPS-exposed cultures. Previous reports demonstrate decreased MAP2 staining in cultured neurons that are fragile or exposed to excitotoxicity (
Bigot et al., 1991;
King et al., 2006).
One notable limitation in our work that primary neuronal cultures were 95% pure with the other 5% consisting of glia (
Coronas et al., 2002;
Monnerie et al., 2003;
Monnerie and Le Roux, 2007). While it is possible that microglia and astrocytes played an important role in the initiation of neuronal injury and this injury was communicated by glia within the 6 hr of exposure in vivo, the use of the NBM which is selective for neurons and does not contain fetal bovine serum is less likely to support glial growth at DIV 14 (when the neuronal injury is continued to be seen). Studies were undertaken to investigate neuronal morphology in co-cultures (neurons plus glia) as well as the expression of the marker of neuronal differentiation (MAP2) in the whole fetal brains (
Burd et al., 2009). In those studies, LPS-exposed neurons showed an abnormal morphology in co-culture with glia, demonstrating a decrease in MAP2 staining (
Burd et al., 2009). Furthermore, MAP2 mRNA expression was similarly decreased in the whole fetal brains (
Burd et al., 2009). Therefore, these studies, along with the current ones, demonstrated that glia may be involved in initiation of neuronal injury but may not be necessary for continued neuronal injury (as observed with these in vitro studies) nor did the presence of glia appear to provide a sufficient neuroprotective role.
Importantly, while LPS-exposed neurons appear dysmorphic and have a decreased number of processes, they continue to grow in culture with no significant increase in cell death. This finding is consistent with our prior work, indicating that there is no overt necrosis or apoptosis in the developing brains as well as no significant involvement of caspases (
Elovitz et al., 2006;
Burd et al., 2009). If this finding is true in vivo, in human preterm birth, then the possibility of continued survival, growth and interaction of abnormal neurons could result in significant and continued brain injury through altered neuron-neuron and neuron-glia communication leading to adverse neurobehavioral outcomes. Since at this time of gestation (E15), greater than 95 % of fetuses deliver within 24 hr (by E16–17), it was not possible to investigate the effect of longer LPS exposure on the fetal brains. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether the exposure to lower doses of intrauterine LPS, while not resulting in preterm birth, will lead to changes in neuronal morphology and neurobehavioral outcomes.
Cytokines, specifically IL-1β and TNF-α, have been demonstrated to be neurotoxic (
Yamasaki et al., 1995;
Barone et al., 1997;
Nawashiro et al., 1997;
Allan et al., 2000;
Viviani et al., 2003,
2006). The increase in cytokines in the amniotic fluid may be more reflective of the fetal inflammatory response and as such, may not indicate the immune response in the fetal brain. However, the elevation of the message expression of these cytokines in the fetal brain in our inflammation-induced PTB model but not the non-infectious model, suggests that these cytokines may be a critical mechanism in the observed neuronal injury. The demonstration that IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA are up-regulated in LPS-exposed brains is consistent with prior work from our laboratory and other animal models (
Cai et al., 2000;
Bell and Hallenbeck, 2002;
Elovitz et al., 2006;
Kumral et al., 2007). IL-1β has been demonstrated to mediate neuronal injury, potentiate excitotoxicity and to be an essential player in neuron-glia cross talk (
Ma et al., 2002). As with IL-1β, IL-6 is reported to alter NMDA receptor-mediated response and to enhance neurotoxicity (
Qiu et al., 1998). Targeting IL-1β and/or IL-6 may hold promise in preventing neuronal injury in a preterm birth. However, we acknowledge that these cytokines may represent secondary mediators and may not be essential for neuronal injury in a preterm birth. Further work is required to dissect the precise mechanisms responsible for fetal and neonatal brain injury in inflammation-induced preterm birth.
In conclusion, neuronal injury may be a critical mechanism by which inflammation-induced preterm birth leads to adverse neurological outcome. By targeting the primary mediators and precise mechanisms involved in inflammation-induced neuronal damage, new avenues for novel therapeutic options to reduce adverse neonatal outcome in ex-preterm infants can begin.