The present study provides first direct evidence for a concentration-dependent EPCR-assisted transport of circulating APC into the brain
in vivo across an intact BBB. The regional BBB PS product for
125I-APC at APC’s cerebral arterial concentration comparable to physiological plasma levels of endogenous mouse APC (
Fernandez et al, 2006) ranged from 3.1 to 4.1μL/min/g brain or two orders of magnitudes greater than for the extracellular space reference marker inulin. This suggests a significant unidirectional transport of APC from cerebral arterial blood to brain under normal conditions. The kinetic analysis revealed that the transport system for APC has a high affinity, i.e., K
m = 1.6 nM, but relatively low capacity (V
max = 7.2 fmol/min/g brain). Since plasma APC concentration in mice is close to 0.1 nM, the BBB transport system with a K
m value that is about 15-fold higher would favor a continuous delivery of small amounts of APC from plasma to brain at any time. This in turn could be of physiological importance for APC’s effects in the CNS such as immunological surveillance and/or cerebral protection, because APC’s precursor protein C is not synthesized normally in the CNS (
Jamison et al, 1995) or is expressed at very low levels, i.e., < 1% of those found in the liver (
Yamamoto and Loskutoff, 1998).
While it is established that the BBB restricts the uptake of hydrophobic molecules into the brain, several specific carrier-mediated transport systems for essential nutrients such as glucose and amino acids have been described at the luminal surface of the BBB, as well as specific receptor-mediated transport systems for different proteins and peptides (
Zlokovic, 2008). In contrast to rapidly transporting nutrients, studies of slowly penetrating peptides and proteins across the BBB require approaches that would allow for an extended exposure time of studied test-molecules to the BBB, i.e., from a few seconds to 10 min or more. This has been achieved by a brain perfusion technique (
Takasato et al, 1984;
Zlokovic et al, 1986) that has been adapted to transgenic mouse models (
LaRue et al, 2004;
Banks, 2006).
The PS product of APC obtained in the present study was comparable to PS products reported for peptides such as leucine enkephalin (
Zlokovic et al, 1989) and arginine vasopressin (
Zlokovic et al, 1990) using brain perfusion method, but was lower than for receptor-mediated BBB transport of amyloid β-peptide-40 (
Martel et al, 1996) or apolipoprotein J (
Zlokovic, 1996) by 1.4 to 1.9-fold, respectively. On the other hand, the PS product of APC was greater than the PS BBB values for insulin (
Duffy and Pardridge, 1987), apolipoprotein E4 (
Martel et al, 1997) or immunoglobulin G (
Zlokovic, 2008), by 3 to 5-fold, respectively. Therefore, the rate of APC transport into the brain falls within the middle range of values typically found for different peptides and proteins transport at the BBB.
Our study shows that two APC variants with reduced anticoagulant activity, i.e., 3K3A-APC and 5A-APC, cross-inhibit APC BBB transport and have a comparable inhibitory constants (K
i) for the APC transport system at the BBB as plasma-derived APC. Although, the Ki/Km ratios suggested somewhat lower affinity of 3K3A-APC and 5A-APC for BBB transport than of APC itself, these differences were not significant. The anticoagulant action of APC involves a cleavage site at Arg506 in factor Va which depends on positively charged residues in surface loops on APC’s protease domain including loop 37 (residues 190–193), the Ca
2+-binding loop (residues 225–235), and the autolysis loop (residues 301–316) (
Mosnier et al, 2007a). The two APC variants were generated with alanine mutation in the 37 loop, i.e., 3K3A-APC (KKK191-193AAA) (
Mosnier et al, 2004), and in the 37 and Ca
2+ binding loops, i.e., 5A-APC containing 5 Ala substitutions for 5 protease domain Arg229/230 and Lys191–193 residues (
Mosnier et al, 2007b). These APC mutants exhibited little or almost no anticoagulant activity (< 5%), but retained normal antiapoptotic activity which on endothelial cells required PAR1 and EPCR (
Mosnier et al, 2004;
Mosnier et al, 2007b). Since the Gla-domain of APC interacts with EPCR (
Mosnier et al, 2007a), one would expect that mutations in the exosite loops in APC for interactions with factor Va will not alter significantly the ability of APC to interact with EPCR at the BBB, which we show resulted in transport of circulating APC into the brain.
EPCR is expressed on endothelial cells where it binds PC and APC specifically, selectively and saturably (
Fukudome and Esmon, 1994). APC and PC bind to EPCR on the surface of isolated human umbilical vein cells with similar affinity (
Fukudome and Esmon, 1994), although soluble EPCR (sEPCR) inhibits with somewhat higher affinity binding of APC compared to PC to phospholipid vesicles (
Liaw et al, 2000). PC binding to sEPCR and phospholipids is broadly dependent on correct Gla domain folding and can be influenced by Gla domain mutations (
Preston et al, 2005). When thrombin binds to thrombomodulin on endothelial cell surface, its potent procoagulant functions are reversed, and its substrate specificity is directed to PC, which it activates (
Esmon, 2003). EPCR augments PC activation by 20-fold
in vivo by binding PC, which concentrates PC on the endothelial surface reducing the Km for PC activation by thrombin-thrombomodulin complex (
Fukudome et al, 1998).
In the present study we found that APC transport at the BBB requires EPCR. This has been confirmed both by using specific blocking antibodies for APC binding site on EPCR and severely-deficient EPCR mice with appropriate controls. In contrast to APC, PC had significantly lower affinity for this BBB transport mechanism, i.e., by > 22-fold. It is possible that APC that is normally generated from PC on the luminal side of the BBB is rapidly endocytosed after its activation by EPCR and transported across the BBB, in addition to exerting anticoagulant activity in cerebral microcirculation and/or cytoprotective activity via PAR1 (
Cheng et al, 2003). We showed that PAR1 was not involved in APC transport, but this does not rule out a possibility that some other yet to be identified co-receptors and/or intracellular mechanisms interact with EPCR to direct APC transport across the BBB and to keep PC on the endothelial surface. EPCR-mediated internalization of APC and diffusion into the nucleus has been shown in hypoxic brain endothelial cells
in vitro (
Thiyagarajan et al, 2007), which in turn might influence directly gene expression (
Joyce et al, 2001;
Riewald et al, 2002;
Riewald and Ruf, 2005). Since brain does not have thrombin and thrombomodulin to activate PC, it is possible that preferential transport of APC across the BBB might represent an important source of brain APC.
In summary our findings suggest an efficient EPCR-assisted transport of APC into the brain via a mechanism that is shared with its variants with reduced anticoagulant but normal cytoprotective activity. These findings support development of therapeutic interventions with APC and/or its analogues with reduced anticoagulant activity for different neurological disorders which might benefit from APC’s cytoprotective, neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory activities.