Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Am J Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 30.
Published in final edited form as:
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 April; 165(4): 479–489.
Published online 2008 February 15. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07081223


An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-212571-f0003.jpg
Summary of Differences in GABA-Related Transcript Expression in Subjects With Schizophrenia Across the Four Cortical Areasa

aDifferences in expression within each subject pair for each transcript are plotted as log2-transformed ratios of schizophrenia subjects to normal comparison subjects. Corresponding nontransformed schizophrenia/normal comparison expression ratios are shown on the right axis. Horizontal bars indicate the mean for all subject pairs in each cortical area.

bSignificant effect of diagnosis only for GAD67 (F=18, df=1, 6.5, p=0.005) and both diagnosis (F=11, df=1, 11, p=0.008) and area (F=20, df=3, 9.4, p<0.001) for GAD65.

cSignificant effect of both diagnosis (F=4.9, df=1, 11, p=0.048) and area (F=15, df=3, 11, p<0.001).

dSignificant effect of both diagnosis (F=21, df=1, 7.6, p=0.002) and area (F=870, df=3, 6.5, p<0.001).

eSignificant effect of both diagnosis (F=36, df=1, 9.1, p<0.001) and area (F=130, df=3, 6.5, p<0.001).

fSignificant effect of area only (F=150, df=3, 9, p<0.001).

gSignificant effect of both diagnosis and area for GABAA receptor α1 subunit (F=8.3, df=1, 9.2, p=0.018; F=220, df=3, 5.5, p<0.001, respectively) and δ subunit (F=14, df=1, 6.5, p=0.008; F=113, df=3, 7.6, p<0.001, respectively).

Images in this article

  • FIGURE 1
  • FIGURE 2
  • FIGURE 3
  • FIGURE 4
Click on the image to see a larger version.