There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (
8,
18,
20,
44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (
18,
19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (
18,
21).
The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in
Geobacter species (
34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as
Geobacter sulfurreducens and
Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (
1,
2,
12,
15,
27,
28,
31-
33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (
1,
4,
7,
15,
17,
28,
40) and electron transfer to electrodes (
5,
7,
11,
33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors
in vitro (
10,
13,
29,
38,
42,
43,
48,
49).
Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (
17,
22,
26,
35,
36,
47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (
3,
14,
26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (
26,
46).
Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (
19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in
Shewanella (
7) and
Geobacter (
41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in
Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the
c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (
7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (
24,
25,
30,
40,
43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in
Shewanella oneidensis (
44,
45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.
Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of
c-type cytochromes (
15,
28) and multicopper proteins (
12,
27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (
15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (
33), is embedded in the outer membrane (
39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (
27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (
39).
OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of
G. sulfurreducens cells (
28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (
28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (
11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.