PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of molcancBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleMolecular CancerJournal Front Page
 
Mol Cancer. 2010; 9: 147.
Published online 2010 June 15. doi:  10.1186/1476-4598-9-147
PMCID: PMC2893458

The new platinum(IV) derivative LA-12 shows stronger inhibitory effect on Hsp90 function compared to cisplatin

Abstract

Background

Cisplatin and its derivatives are commonly used anti-cancer drugs. However, cisplatin has clinical limitations including serious side effects and frequent emergence of intrinsic or acquired resistance. Thus, the novel platinum(IV) complex LA-12 represents a promising treatment modality, which shows increased intracellular penetration resulting in improved cytotoxicity in various cancer cell lines, including cisplatin resistant cells.

Results

LA-12 disrupts cellular proliferation regardless of the p53 status in the cells, however the potency of the drug is greatly enhanced by the presence of a functional p53, indicating several mechanisms of action. Similarly to cisplatin, an interaction of LA-12 with molecular chaperone Hsp90 was proposed. Binding of LA-12 to Hsp90 was demonstrated by Hsp90 immunoprecipitation followed by platinum measurement using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). An inhibitory effect of LA-12 on Hsp90 chaperoning function was shown by decrease of Hsp90-assisted wild-type p53 binding to p21WAF1 promoter sequence in vitro and by accelerated ubiqutination and degradation of primarily unfolded mutant p53 proteins in cells exposed to LA-12.

Conclusions

To generalize our findings, LA-12 induced degradation of other Hsp90 client proteins such as Cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor was shown and proved as more efficient in comparison with cisplatin. This newly characterised molecular mechanism of action opens opportunities to design new cancer treatment strategy profitable from unique LA-12 properties, which combine DNA damaging and Hsp90 inhibitory effects.

Background

Cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)] is a platinum-based anticancer drug commonly used for treatment of different types of cancer, including ovarian, testicular, head and neck or lung carcinomas [1]. Although cisplatin exerts significant anti-tumour activity, cisplatin-based therapies cause numerous side effects, such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and nausea. The intrinsic as well as acquired resistances to cisplatin-based therapy also represent substantial complications for the treatment of tumours.

For this reason, vast efforts were committed to develop novel platinum-based complexes to overcome platinum resistance, to reduce cisplatin side effects and to introduce novel mechanisms of anti-cancer action. Two derivatives, carboplatin (cis-diammine-(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II)) and oxaliplatin (trans-R,R.cyclohexane-1,2-diammine)oxalatoplatinum(II)), have been introduced [2]. Taken together, these three drugs represent all of the available platinum drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use [3]. In addition to substantial side effects, these three drugs also require intravenous administration, therefore a new generation of platinum drugs represented by satraplatin (JM216) [(OC-6-43)-bis(acetato)amminedichloro(cyclohexylamine)platinum(IV)] has been generated. JM216 represents the first orally administered platinum compound which has been evaluated in clinical trials [2,4,5].

LA-12, [(OC-6-43)-bis(acetato)(1-adamantylamine)amminedichloroplatinum (IV)], is a hydrophobic platinum(IV) complex structurally similar to JM216, which contains 1-adamantylamine instead of cyclohexylamine non-leaving ligand [6] which provides this drug different properties. LA-12 has shown a higher cytotoxicity than JM216 when tested on a panel of 14 cancer cell lines of various origin and different cisplatin sensitivity [6,7] and no cross-resistance with cisplatin [6,8]. LA-12 has also displayed (i) higher antitumor activity in comparison with cisplatin and JM216, (ii) favourable pharmacokinetics and (iii) relatively low acute toxicity in a panel of pre-clinical in vivo studies [9-11].

The cytotoxic mode of action of cisplatin is mediated by its interaction with DNA to form DNA adducts, primarily intra-strand crosslink adducts, which activate several signal transduction pathways, including those involving ATR, p53, p73, and MAPK, and culminate in the activation of apoptosis [12]. JM216 has a mechanism of action similar to that of cisplatin, inducing the formation of DNA adducts and inter- and intra-strand crosslinks and resulting in G2 arrest and induction of apoptosis [13]. The principle mechanisms of LA-12 effects are not fully understood to date, although there is some evidence that exposure to LA-12 can disrupt cell proliferation and induce apoptosis more potently than cisplatin in both p53 dependent and independent manners [14,15]. Interestingly, LA-12 induces unique changes in the profile of gene expression compared to cisplatin, indicating a distinct mode of action resulting in the differential activation of both p53-dependent and p53-independent gene targets [16].

Besides the well known cisplatin DNA-mediated effect, the other mechanism of cisplatin action was described demonstrating that cisplatin may also disrupt the function of some proteins, including heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) [17]. According to this study, cisplatin associates with the molecular chaperone Hsp90 and reduces its' chaperone activity. For example, this can result in the degradation of steroid receptors [18] and/or inhibition of interaction between Hsp90 and inositol hexakisphosphate kinase-2 (IP6K2), which disrupts the inhibitory effect of Hsp90 on IP6K2, leading to increased diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (IP7) formation and sensitisation of cancer cells to apoptosis [19,20].

Since it is supposed that LA-12 undergoes metabolic changes and serves actually as a pro-drug for chemotherapeutically active platinum analogues, it is possible that these active metabolites can interact with proteins analogous to cisplatin, resulting in stronger cytotoxic or cytostatic effects. According to this hypothesis we have analyzed whether LA-12 can bind to Hsp90 resulting in inhibition of its protective chaperoning function such as folding, stabilization, activation and assembly of its "client" proteins.

Results

Time and dose dependent accumulation of LA-12 in cancer cells in comparison with cisplatin

LA-12 and cisplatin uptake into cells was determined by AAS platinum amount measurement in lysates of cells treated with different doses of these drugs for different periods of time. We observed rapid and high initial accumulation of platinum after 0.5 hour incubation with LA-12 in all concentrations used, rising up to 4 hours of incubation. In subsequent time points, platinum level remained stable. The platinum amount in cells was also dependent on the concentration used.

In contrast, there was no platinum detected in response to 1 μM cisplatin treatment. Compared to LA-12 exposure, platinum levels were detected only when 10 μM and 50 μM cisplatin doses were administered. In response to LA-12, platinum levels were 30 to 50 times higher depending on concentration used and time interval (Figure (Figure1).1). These results demonstrate that cellular uptake of LA-12 is faster and more effective compared to cisplatin.

Figure 1
Platinum accumulation in H1299 cells. H1299 cells were treated with varying concentrations of LA-12 and cisplatin for indicated time intervals. Platinum levels in cell lysates were analysed by AAS. Results are mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. ...

LA-12 specifically interacts with Hsp90

To assess the anticipated interaction of Hsp90 with LA-12, we measured in triplicate the amount of platinum bound to Hsp90 by AAS after immunoprecipitation of Hsp90 from H1299 cells treated with 10 and 50 μM both LA-12 and cisplatin. We detected significant amounts of platinum after LA-12 treatment in contrast to cisplatin treatment, where only after using 50 μM concentration was a limited amount of platinum detected (about detection limit of AAS) (Table (Table1).1). The presence of Hsp90 in the samples after immunoprecipitation was confirmed using western blot (Figure (Figure2).2). These data show that LA-12 binds to Hsp90 more effectively than cisplatin in vivo, probably due to the higher intracellular levels of LA-12.

Table 1
Analysis of interaction of Hsp90 with LA-12
Figure 2
Detection of Hsp90 protein. The levels of Hsp90 protein in H1299 whole cell lysates and after immunoprecipitation of Hsp90 in LA-12 and cisplatin treated cells were analysed by western blotting. EEV1-2.1 mouse monoclonal antibody was used for detection ...

Inhibition of Hsp90 assisted p53 binding to promoter sequence of p21WAF1 by LA-12

The influence of LA-12 on the ability of wild-type p53 to specifically bind to its target sequence derived from the p21WAF1 gene promoter was tested using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). It is known that human wild-type p53 binding activity is facilitated by molecular chaperone Hsp90 under physiological conditions and this process is inhibited by geldanamycin [21]. Thus in 22°C wild-type p53 tetramers can bind to the p21WAF1 promoter independently of Hsp90 status. Under physiological conditions (37°C) in a control reaction without Hsp90, human wild-type p53 loses its ability to bind to the p21WAF1 promoter; however in presence of human Hsp90β and ATP, wild-type p53 can develop transcriptionally active tetramers that bind to the p21WAF1 promoter sequence. In consequence, when Hsp90β is inhibited by 17-AAG, the affinity of wild-type p53 to p21WAF1 promoter is disrupted. Similarly, in a case of LA-12 we also observed the disruption of Hsp90β activity leading to inhibition of wild-type p53 DNA binding affinity (Figure (Figure3).3). Cisplatin could not be effectively compared to LA-12 and 17-AAG in this assay, as it directly disrupts the p53 binding to promoter sequence (not shown).

Figure 3
The Hsp90-dependent binding of wild-type p53 protein to p21WAF1 gene promoter sequence is inhibited by LA-12 and 17-AAG. A) Wild-type p53 binding (0.125 μM tetramer) to the promoter sequence at 22°C (the main band) is not influenced by ...

LA-12 inhibits Hsp90 assisted folding and initiates degradation of unfolded proteins

Hsp90 is important for folding and stabilization/degradation of client proteins. In our previous work we demonstrated that particular p53 mutations show different ratios between native wild-type p53 conformations (recognized by PAb1620 antibody) and denatured conformations (recognized by PAb240 antibody) and highlighted an important role of Hsp90 to maintain the mutant p53 protein conformation and stability [22]. In the case of partially folded p53 mutants, such as R273H naturally expressed in MDA-MB-468 cells, the native conformation is maintained by Hsp90. Thus, inhibition of Hsp90 results in a decrease of R273H mutant p53 folded conformation and an increase of denatured conformation, although the overall protein levels are not changed. We found that LA-12 is also able to cause the same changes in R273H folded p53 mutant conformation without appreciably affecting the level of total p53 protein (Figure (Figure4A).4A). In the case of predominantly unfolded mutant p53 proteins, such as R175H naturally expressed in SK-BR-3 cells, inhibition of Hsp90 function results in their degradation, and the identical effect is seen after treatment with LA-12 (Figure (Figure4B4B).

Figure 4
Analysis of p53 mutant protein conformation. p53 mutant protein conformation was analysed in A) MDA-MB-468 cells containing mostly folded p53 R273H mutant and B) SK-BR-3 cells containing only unfolded p53 R175H mutant. Cells were treated for 9 hours with ...

Mechanism of mutant p53 protein degradation in response to LA-12

In our previous work we have shown that naturally unfolded mutants, such as p53 R175H in SK-BR-3 cells, form stable complexes with chaperones and that Hsp90 activity is crucial to prevent their degradation [22]. If the Hsp90 activity is blocked by 17-AAG, the denatured mutants develop complex with Hsp70 and CHIP proteins, where ubiquitin ligase CHIP is responsible for ubiquitination of unfolded p53 and ubiqutinated p53 protein is targeted for degradation in the proteasome [22,23]. To investigate whether LA-12 also initiates unfolded p53 mutant degradation via activation of CHIP ubiquitin ligase, we compared mutant p53 levels in cells transiently transfected by CHIP and a dominant-negative CHIP-TPR truncated form, which contains the TPR domain (responsible for interactions with chaperones) but lacks the ubiquitination domain. In MDA-MB-468 cells with a partially unfolded p53 mutant that is independent of Hsp90 activity, there was no effect of 17-AAG or LA-12 in the presence or absence of CHIP or CHIP-TPR (Figure (Figure5A).5A). In mock-transfected SK-BR-3 cells, we observed a decrease of mutant p53 in response to both LA-12 and 17-AAG, as well as in cells transfected by CHIP. Importantly, transfection by CHIP-TPR decreased the rate of degradation of the unfolded mutant p53, indicating the role of CHIP ubiquitn ligase in degradation of R175H p53 mutant caused by LA-12 (Figure (Figure5B5B).

Figure 5
Analysis of p53 mutant protein degradation. p53 mutant protein levels were analysed in A) MDA-MB-468 cells containing mostly folded p53 R273H mutant and B) SK-BR-3 cells containing unfolded p53 R175H mutant transfected with CHIP or CHIP-TPR protein by ...

LA-12 induces degradation of not only mutant p53 but also of other Hsp90 client proteins

Accordingly we found that LA-12 is responsible for massive decrease of p53 mutant proteins that adopt a predominantly denatured conformation (BT-474 and SK-BR-3 cells); in cells which carry both native and denatured conformations of mutant p53 (T-47D, BT-549 and MDA-MB-468), the decrease of p53 level was noticeable only after longer incubations (9 hours) with the drug. In MDA-MB-231 cells, where mutant p53 occurs predominantly in native conformation, no decrease of p53 level was observed even after prolonged incubation. Interestingly, apart from p53 protein, LA-12 also induces degradation of other Hsp90 client proteins, such as Cyclin D1 and Estrogen Receptor (Figure (Figure66).

Figure 6
Analysis of degradation of Hsp90 client proteins. Protein levels of p53, cyclin D1 (CD1) and estrogen receptor (ER) were determined in cells treated for 3, 6 and 9 hours with 10 μM cisplatin and 10 μM LA-12 by western blotting. CM-1 rabbit ...

Importantly, the 10 μM drug dose used in our experiments is equal to 1.95 mg/l platinum, which corresponds to the plasma levels of platinum shown in previous in vivo studies [10,24]. The maximum platinum plasma concentration 1.54 and 6.25 mg/l in rats was observed within 1 hour after oral administration of 38.6 and 540 mg/kg LA-12, respectively [24]. Interestingly, maximum tolerated single oral dose of LA-12 in mouse model was 1000 mg/kg [10].

Discussion

Platinum(IV) complexes represent a class of anticancer agents that are activated by reactions with reducing agents present in body liquids after their administration. Thus, the platinum(IV) complexes display potential advantages over their platinum(II) counterparts because of their greater stability and bioreductive activation, thereby allowing a greater proportion of the drug to arrive at the target intact. Thus, it is not surprising that the cellular uptake of LA-12 was faster and more effective than that of cisplatin (Figure (Figure11).

Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone and is one of the most abundant proteins expressed in cells [25]. Molecular chaperone Hsp90 is a member of the heat shock protein family, which is up-regulated in response to stress and its' in vivo function is ATP-dependent [26]. Hsp90 exists as a homodimer, which contains three domains. The N-terminal domain contains an ATP-binding site that binds the natural products geldanamycin and radicicol. Hsp90 function depends upon the ability of the N-terminal domain to bind and hydrolyze ATP, which is regulated and coupled with the conformational changes of the Hsp90 dimer [27]. The middle domain exhibits high affinity for co-chaperones as well as client proteins [28]. The structure of the C-terminus of Hsp90 contains the MEEVD sequence, which is known to bind co-chaperones that contain multiple copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR), a 34 amino acid sequence [29]. Interestingly, the middle C-terminal part of Hsp90 has been implicated biochemically as the site of a putative second cryptic ATP-binding site on Hsp90 [26]. The contribution of this site to the overall regulation of chaperone function is not clear, but novobiocin has been reported to interact with this site and alter the conformation of the chaperone [30]. Importantly, cisplatin has also been found to bind to an Hsp90 site that overlaps the putative ATP/novobiocin binding site in this region, leading to inhibition of some Hsp90 activities [17,26]. The observed higher affinity of Hsp90 to LA-12 may be explained by very specific properties of C-terminal domain of Hsp90. This domain contains several solvent-exposed hydrophobic residues, which are responsible for binding of client protein such as unligated glucocorticoid receptor [31]. Consequently the hydrophobic properties of LA-12 could explain its preferential binding to Hsp90 in contrast to cisplatin.

The ability of LA-12 to inhibit Hsp90 function was shown using several approaches. (i) EMSA, based on the fact that under physiological conditions the chaperone activity of Hsp90 is important for the transcriptional activity of genotypically wild-type p53 [21] clearly demonstrated LA-12 as potent inhibitor of Hsp90 chaperoning function. (ii) Determination of p53 conformation in cells expressing various p53 mutants, which were exposed to LA-12, revealed that the unfolded mutant p53 proteins that do not rely on Hsp90 activity are less stable than folded mutant p53 proteins that require Hsp90 activity. These findings are in agreement with previous work showing that the half-life of p53 mutant positively correlates with their conformational stability [22].

It was shown that inhibition of Hsp90 results in ubiquitination and degradation of primarily unfolded p53 mutants. This MDM2-independent degradation of unfolded p53 mutant is mediated by chaperone interacting protein CHIP. Our results show that CHIP is responsible for LA-12 mediated degradation in the same way as 17-AAG, which supports our theories finding LA-12 as a specific Hsp90 inhibitor.

Accordingly to both higher cellular uptake of LA-12 and at least 10-fold higher presence of platinum bound to Hsp90 in cells exposed to LA-12 compared to cells treated by cisplatin (Table (Table1),1), a stronger suppressive effect of LA-12 on Hsp90 activity and function in relation to cisplatin could be expected. This statement was confirmed by the ability of LA-12 to influence the stability and degradation rate of other Hsp90 client proteins, such as estrogen receptor and cyclin D1 compared to cisplatin, which did not decrease the level of these proteins.

Conclusions

In summary, our data indicate that cellular uptake of LA-12 is more effective compared to cisplatin resulting in more extensive binding of LA-12 to Hsp90 in vivo. This interaction is responsible for direct inhibition of Hsp90 chaperone function. These unique properties predict LA-12 as a novel promising anti-cancer therapeutic exploiting dual mode of action in inducing genotoxic damage and inhibiting Hsp90 activity.

Methods

Cell cultures

All human cancer cell lines were obtained from ATCC. Cell lines BT-474, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231, T-47D, BT-549 and SK-BR-3 contain different p53 mutations (E285K, R273H, R280K, L194F, R249S and R175H, respectively), whereas the wild-type allele was lost in all these cell lines. MCF-7 cells contain wild-type p53, and H1299 cells are p53-null. Cells were periodically checked for morphology by microscope and regularly screened for mycoplasma using Hoechst staining.

Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland), 300 mg/l L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland), 100 U/ml penicillin (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland) and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland), in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were grown to 80% confluence prior to experimental treatments.

Chemicals

The following anti-neoplastic drugs were used in this study: LA-12, cisplatin (Pliva-Lachema a.s., Brno, Czech Republic), 17-AAG (Alexis Biochemicals, Lausen, Switzerland). LA-12 and cisplatin were dissolved in DMSO and diluted in cell medium to 0.5 mM stock solution and 17-AAG was dissolved in DMSO to 2 mM stock solution. Stock solutions of LA-12 and cisplatin were freshly prepared before use. The final concentration of DMSO in cell culture medium did not exceed 0.2%.

SDS-PAGE and western blotting

SDS-PAGE and western blotting were performed as described previously [16]. The following antibodies were used: DO-1 mouse monoclonal antibody directed towards the epitope 20-SDLWKL-25 within the p53 N-terminal region [32], CM-1 rabbit polyclonal antibody against human p53 protein (in house antibody), CHIP-11.1 mouse monoclonal antibody recognizing full length as well as truncated CHIP protein (in house antibody), Estrogen Receptor (clone SP1) rabbit monoclonal antibody (Lab Vision, Fremont CA, USA), CD1 mouse monoclonal antibody recognizing Cyclin D1 (in house antibody), EEV1-2.1 mouse monoclonal antibody against Hsp90 protein (in house antibody) and AC-40 monoclonal antibody recognizing actin (Sigma-Aldrich Inc. St. Louis, USA), which was used as a protein loading control. Final concentration of all antibodies used for immunodetection of proteins was 1 μg/ml in 5% milk containing 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS.

Immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation of conformationally different forms of p53 protein was performed using 1 μg of mouse monoclonal antibodies PAb1620 recognizing the wild-type conformation of human p53 protein at native form [33,34] and PAb240 recognizing the mutant conformations of p53 at native form [35], as described previously [33,35]. For immunoprecipitation of Hsp90 protein for platinum amount measurement by AAS, cells were lysed in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) and 0.5% Tween 20 and sonicated. Protein concentrations were measured using Bradford's assay. 200 μl of cell lysate containing 400 μg of total protein was incubated overnight together with 2 μg of EEV2-1.1 mouse monoclonal antibody against Hsp90β protein (in house antibody) and AC88 mouse monoclonal antibody against Hsp90 protein (Stressgen Biotech Corp., Victoria, BC, Canada). 15 μl of G-protein sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, Wien, Austria) was used to precipitate the antibody. After three washes in lysis buffer, beads were resuspended in 200 μl of 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) and 0.5% Tween 20 and boiled for 10 min.

Preparation of samples for AAS platinum amount measurement

Cells were incubated for the given time intervals with different doses of LA-12 and cisplatin. Control and treated cells were collected by centrifugation, washed three times with ice-cold PBS, lysed in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) and 0.5% Tween 20 and sonicated. Protein concentrations were measured using Bradford's assay. 200 μl of cell lysate were used for platinum amount measurement by AAS.

In vitro p53 DNA Binding Assay

Human wild-type p53 and human Hsp90β were purified and activity of p53 was quantified by EMSA as described previously [36]. Simplified, the assay is based on the ability of human recombinant Hsp90 to restore the specific DNA binding activity of human recombinant p53 at 37°C in vitro. A preincubation with Hsp90 inhibitors prior to p53 inactivation at 37°C was carried out as described for geldanamycin [21].

List of abbreviations

AAS: Atomic absorption spectrometry; EMSA: Electrophoretic mobility shift assay; CHIP: Carboxy terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein; MDM2: Mouse double minute 2 homolog; Hsp90: Heat shock protein 90

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

VK designed, performed and analysed platinum accumulation experiments, performed immunoprecipitation experiments and prepared the manuscript, RH designed and performed degradation experiments and prepared the manuscript, DW performed EMSA experiments, EM performed CHIP transfection experiments, VH and DS performed AAS analysis, PM and PS contributed to the experimental design of the study, BV contributed to the conception and design of the entire study and the final editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. P. J. Coates for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by PLIVA-Lachema a. s., IGA MZ CR NS/9812-4, MZ0MOU2005 and GACR 301/08/1649.

References

  • Ho YP, Au-Yeung SC, To KK. Platinum-based anticancer agents: innovative design strategies and biological perspectives. Med Res Rev. 2003;23:633–655. doi: 10.1002/med.10038. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kozubik A, Vaculova A, Soucek K, Vondracek J, Turanek J, Hofmanova J. Novel Anticancer Platinum(IV) Complexes with Adamantylamine: Their Efficiency and Innovative Chemotherapy Strategies Modifying Lipid Metabolism. Met Based Drugs. 2008;2008:417–897. doi: 10.1155/2008/417897. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Choy H, Park C, Yao M. Current status and future prospects for satraplatin, an oral platinum analogue. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1633–1638. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2176. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fokkema E, Groen HJ, Bauer J, Uges DR, Weil C, Smith IE. Phase II study of oral platinum drug JM216 as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3822–3827. [PubMed]
  • Kelland LR. An update on satraplatin: the first orally available platinum anticancer drug. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000;9:1373–1382. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.6.1373. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zak F, Turanek J, Kroutil A, Sova P, Mistr A, Poulova A, Mikolin P, Zak Z, Kasna A, Zaluska D. Platinum(IV) complex with adamantylamine as nonleaving amine group: synthesis, characterization, and in vitro antitumor activity against a panel of cisplatin-resistant cancer cell lines. J Med Chem. 2004;47:761–763. doi: 10.1021/jm030858+. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Turanek J, Kasna A, Zaluska D, Neca J, Kvardova V, Knotigova P, Horvath V, SI L, Kozubik A, Sova P. New platinum(IV) complex with adamantylamine ligand as a promising anti-cancer drug: comparison of in vitro cytotoxic potential towards A2780/cisR cisplatin-resistant cell line within homologous series of platinum(IV) complexes. Anticancer Drugs. 2004;15:537–543. doi: 10.1097/01.cad.0000127147.57796.e5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Horvath V, Blanarova O, Svihalkova-Sindlerova L, Soucek K, Hofmanova J, Sova P, Kroutil A, Fedorocko P, Kozubik A. Platinum(IV) complex with adamantylamine overcomes intrinsic resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cermanova J, Chladek J, Soval P, Kroutil A, Semerad M, Berankova Z, Siroky P, Surova I. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of a novel oral platinum cytostatic drug ([OC-6-43]-bis[acetato][1-adamantylamine]amminedichloroplatinum [IV]) in pigs. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2004;26:679–685. doi: 10.1358/mf.2004.26.9.872565. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sova P, Mistr A, Kroutil A, Zak F, Pouckova P, Zadinova M. Preclinical anti-tumor activity of a new oral platinum(IV) drug LA-12. Anticancer Drugs. 2005;16:653–657. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200507000-00010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sova P, Mistr A, Kroutil A, Zak F, Pouckova P, Zadinova M. Comparative anti-tumor efficacy of two orally administered platinum(IV) drugs in nude mice bearing human tumor xenografts. Anticancer Drugs. 2006;17:201–206. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Siddik ZH. Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7265–7279. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206933. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mellish KJ, Barnard CF, Murrer BA, Kelland LR. DNA-binding properties of novel cis- and trans platinum-based anticancer agents in 2 human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:717–723. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910620612. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Horvath V, Soucek K, Svihalkova-Sindlerova L, Vondracek J, Blanarova O, Hofmanova J, Sova P, Kozubik A. Different cell cycle modulation following treatment of human ovarian carcinoma cells with a new platinum(IV) complex vs cisplatin. Invest New Drugs. 2007;25:435–443. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9062-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roubalova E, Kvardova V, Hrstka R, Borilova S, Michalova E, Dubska L, Muller P, Sova P, Vojtesek B. The effect of cellular environment and p53 status on the mode of action of the platinum derivative LA-12. Invest New Drugs. 2010;28(4):445–53. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9270-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hrstka R, Powell DJ, Kvardova V, Roubalova E, Bourougaa K, Candeias MM, Sova P, Zak F, Fahraeus R, Vojtesek B. The novel platinum(IV) complex LA-12 induces p53 and p53/47 responses that differ from the related drug, cisplatin. Anticancer Drugs. 2008;19:369–379. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3282f7f500. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Itoh H, Ogura M, Komatsuda A, Wakui H, Miura AB, Tashima Y. A novel chaperone-activity-reducing mechanism of the 90-kDa molecular chaperone HSP90. Biochem J. 1999;343(Pt 3):697–703. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3430697. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rosenhagen MC, Soti C, Schmidt U, Wochnik GM, Hartl FU, Holsboer F, Young JC, Rein T. The heat shock protein 90-targeting drug cisplatin selectively inhibits steroid receptor activation. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17:1991–2001. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0141. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shames DS, Minna JD. IP6K2 is a client for HSP90 and a target for cancer therapeutics development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1389–1390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711993105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chakraborty A, Koldobskiy MA, Sixt KM, Juluri KR, Mustafa AK, Snowman AM, van Rossum DB, Patterson RL, Snyder SH. HSP90 regulates cell survival via inositol hexakisphosphate kinase-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1134–1139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711168105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Walerych D, Kudla G, Gutkowska M, Wawrzynow B, Muller L, King FW, Helwak A, Boros J, Zylicz A, Zylicz M. Hsp90 chaperones wild-type p53 tumor suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48836–48845. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407601200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Muller P, Hrstka R, Coomber D, Lane DP, Vojtesek B. Chaperone-dependent stabilization and degradation of p53 mutants. Oncogene. 2008;27:3371–3383. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1211010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lukashchuk N, Vousden KH. Ubiquitination and degradation of mutant p53. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:8284–8295. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00050-07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sova P, Chladek J, Zak F, Mistr A, Kroutil A, Semerad M, Slovak Z. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of platinum in rats following single and multiple oral doses of LA-12 [(OC-6-43)-bis(acetato)(1-adamantylamine)amminedichloroplatinum(IV)] Int J Pharm. 2005;288:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.09.020. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Csermely P, Schnaider T, Soti C, Prohaszka Z, Nardai G. The 90-kDa molecular chaperone family: structure, function, and clinical applications. A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;79:129–168. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00013-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Soti C, Racz A, Csermely P. A Nucleotide-dependent molecular switch controls ATP binding at the C-terminal domain of Hsp90. N-terminal nucleotide binding unmasks a C-terminal binding pocket. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:7066–7075. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105568200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Prodromou C, Roe SM, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell. 1997;90:65–75. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hawle P, Siepmann M, Harst A, Siderius M, Reusch HP, Obermann WM. The middle domain of Hsp90 acts as a discriminator between different types of client proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:8385–8395. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02188-05. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Donnelly A, Blagg BS. Novobiocin and additional inhibitors of the Hsp90 C-terminal nucleotide-binding pocket. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:2702–2717. doi: 10.2174/092986708786242895. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yun BG, Huang W, Leach N, Hartson SD, Matts RL. Novobiocin induces a distinct conformation of Hsp90 and alters Hsp90-cochaperone-client interactions. Biochemistry. 2004;43:8217–8229. doi: 10.1021/bi0497998. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fang L, Ricketson D, Getubig L, Darimont B. Unliganded and hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptors interact with distinct hydrophobic sites in the Hsp90 C-terminal domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18487–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609163103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vojtesek B, Bartek J, Midgley CA, Lane DP. An immunochemical analysis of the human nuclear phosphoprotein p53. New monoclonal antibodies and epitope mapping using recombinant p53. J Immunol Methods. 1992;151:237–244. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90122-A. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Milner J. Structures and functions of the tumor suppressor p53. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1997;45:797–803. [PubMed]
  • Wang PL, Sait F, Winter G. The 'wildtype' conformation of p53: epitope mapping using hybrid proteins. Oncogene. 2001;20:2318–2324. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204316. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gannon JV, Greaves R, Iggo R, Lane DP. Activating mutations in p53 produce a common conformational effect. A monoclonal antibody specific for the mutant form. Embo J. 1990;9:1595–1602. [PubMed]
  • Walerych D, Olszewski MB, Gutkowska M, Helwak A, Zylicz M, Zylicz A. Hsp70 molecular chaperones are required to support p53 tumor suppressor activity under stress conditions. Oncogene. 2009;28:4284–4294. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.281. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Molecular Cancer are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central