PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Epilepsy Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2892796
NIHMSID: NIHMS179334

Language and Brain Volumes in Children with Epilepsy

Rochelle Caplan, M.D., Professor, Jennifer Levitt, M.D., Associate Professor, Prabha Siddarth, Ph.D., Research Statistician, Keng Nei Wu, B.A., Suresh Gurbani, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Clinical Professor, W. Donald Shields, M.D., Professor, and Raman Sankar, M.D., Ph.D., Professor

Abstract

This study compared the relationship of language skill with fronto-temporal volumes in 69 medically treated epilepsy subjects and 34 healthy children, aged 6.1-16.6 years. It also determined if the patients with linguistic deficits had abnormal volumes and atypical associations between volumes and language skills in these brain regions. The children underwent language testing and magnetic resonance imaging scans at 1.5 Tesla. Brain tissue was segmented and fronto-temporal volumes were computed. Higher mean language scores were significantly associated with larger inferior frontal gyrus, temporal lobe, and posterior superior temporal gyrus gray matter volumes in the epilepsy group and in the children with epilepsy with average language scores. Increased total brain and dorsolateral prefrontal gray and white matter volumes, however, were associated with higher language scores in the healthy controls. Within the epilepsy group, linguistic deficits were related to smaller anterior superior temporal gyrus gray matter volumes and a negative association between language scores and dorsolateral prefrontal gray matter volumes. These findings demonstrate abnormal development of language related brain regions, and imply differential reorganization of brain regions subserving language in children with epilepsy with normal linguistic skills and in those with impaired language.

Keywords: Language, epilepsy, development, MRI, frontal lobe, temporal lobe

Introduction

Recent studies on large samples of children with epilepsy with average intelligence with both new onset (1) and chronic epilepsy (2) demonstrate linguistic difficulties and their association with seizure variables. There is an increase in the rate of language impairment from 25% in children, aged 6 - 8 years, to 33% in 8 -12-year-old subjects, and to more than 50% in those aged 12 -15 years (2). In addition, different seizure variables are related to the presence of linguistic deficits in each age group (2). These findings suggest dissimilar age-related effects of epilepsy on language development.

Although typically developing children acquire language during the toddler period, their linguistic skills continue to mature during childhood, and undergo acceleration during adolescence with an increase in syntactic complexity, advanced use of grammar and vocabulary, as well as abstraction (3-5). In parallel, language-related brain regions, such as the frontal lobe and superior temporal gyrus, particularly the posterior superior temporal gyrus, mature by the end of adolescence through antero-posterior dynamic changes in gray matter volume, thickness, and concentration (6-8). Myelination also progresses in these brain regions, albeit simultaneously (9).

Prior neuroimaging studies of children with epilepsy report abnormal lateralization of language (10-14), as well as a relationship of syntactic impairments with reduced cortical activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (13), linguistic impairment with neuroradiological abnormalities (15), and social communication deficits with volumetric abnormalities in language-related regions (16). However, there have been no prior studies on the association of language impairment with volumes in brain regions typically associated with language.

Therefore, the study presented in this paper examined if children with epilepsy with average intelligence and age matched controls would have disparate associations of basic linguistic skill with gray and white matter volumes of language-related regions including Broca’s area (i.e., inferior frontal gyrus), Wernicke’s area (i.e., superior temporal gyrus and its anterior and posterior divisions), as well as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and orbital frontal gyrus. We also determined if compared to children with epilepsy without linguistic deficits, those with language impairment had reduced gray and white matter volumes, as well as different associations of overall language function with volumes in these brain regions. In addition, we explored if the patients with and without impaired language differed on seizure variables (i.e., seizure frequency, age of onset, duration of illness, number of antiepileptic drugs, EEG lateralization and localization, febrile convulsions, and prolonged seizures).

Methods

Subjects

The study included 103 children, 69 with and 34 without epilepsy, aged 6.1 – 16.6 years. Table 1 describes the study groups in terms of demographic variables, IQ, and psychopathology. We determined socioeconomic status using the Hollingshead 2 factor index (17), based on parental occupational and educational status, Performance IQ with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-3rd edition (WISC-III) (18), and psychiatric diagnosis with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children, the Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) (19), as described in detail in (20). Other than significantly lower Performance IQ scores (18) and higher rate of psychiatric diagnoses in the epilepsy groups, there were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

Table 1
Demographic Features of Study Groups

The epilepsy group included 45 children with cryptogenic epilepsy who had complex partial seizures (CPS) and 24 children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). A pediatric neurologist at each recruitment site made a diagnosis of CPS or CAE according to the International Classification of Epilepsy (21). The study inclusionary criteria for the epilepsy subjects included a diagnosis of CPS or CAE and at least one seizure during the year prior to participation in the study. A CPS subject had to have cryptogenic epilepsy and clinical manifestations of CPS with or without focal EEG findings. All CAE patients had EEG evidence of 3 Hz spike and wave in addition to absence seizures induced by hyperventilation.

We excluded patients with a mixed seizure disorder, previous epilepsy surgery, atypical spike and wave complexes, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, a structural MRI abnormality other than mesial temporal sclerosis, a neurological illness other than epilepsy, chronic medical illness, a metabolic disorder, a hearing disorder, mental retardation based on school/classroom placement or IQ < 70, and bilingual speakers of American English who did not attend English speaking schools or speak English at home. None of the epilepsy subjects had MRI evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis.

We recruited 37% subjects from tertiary centers (i.e., UCLA and USC based clinics) and 63% from community services (i.e., Los Angeles and Anaheim Kaiser Permanente, the Los Angeles and San Diego Chapters of the Epilepsy Foundation of America, private practices). UCLA IRB approved recruitment flyers were available for parents of the epilepsy children at each recruitment site. Parents who decided to enter their children into the study contacted the study coordinator who provided information about the study and used a UCLA IRB approved telephone script to determine if the children met the study’s inclusionary but none of the exclusionary criteria. The study coordinator also contacted the child’s pediatric neurologist to confirm that the child’s diagnosis and rule out exclusionary criteria. One UCLA pediatric neurology investigator (W.D.S.) reviewed the history, EEG records, and diagnosis of each epilepsy subject from the different recruitment sites. If he did not concur with the diagnosis or EEG findings, the child was not included in the study.

Based on information obtained from the parents and the children’s medical records, 21% of the patients had one seizure, 21% had 2-10, and 58% had more than 10 seizures during the year prior to participation in the study. Regarding antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 72% of the children were on polytherapy, 24% on monotherapy, and 14% received no AEDs. The mean age of onset and duration of illness were 6.85 (SD 2.14) and 3.02 (SD 2.41) years, respectively. Twelve percent of the epilepsy subjects had a past history of febrile convulsions and 34% of seizures that lasted more than five minutes.

Reports of EEGs conducted at the time of the children’s initial epilepsy diagnosis were available for 42 of the 45 CPS subjects with the following localization findings: non focal in 6, fronto-temporal in 13, temporal in 14, and other localization in 9. Regarding lateralization of EEG findings, 12 patients had left, 8 had right, 12 had bilateral, and 10 had no lateralized epileptic activity. All CAE subjects had 3Hz spike and wave, and none had generalized tonic clonic seizures. One CPS patient had secondarily generalized seizures. There was background slowing in 8 CPS patients and 1 CAE child. Based on the laterality index described in Soper et al. (22), 62 epilepsy subjects were right handed, 1 was left handed, and handedness information was unavailable for three subjects.

To include control children from a wide range of ethnic and socioeconomic status backgrounds similar to that of the epilepsy group, we recruited 34 control subjects, aged 6.1 – 15.8 years, from four public and two private schools in the Los Angeles community. The study coordinator screened potential participants for neurological, psychiatric, language, and hearing disorders through a telephone conversation with a parent. Given volumetric abnormalities in children without epilepsy who have attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (23), depression (24, 25), and anxiety disorders (26, 27), we excluded children with these diagnoses in the past or who met criteria for these disorders once enrolled in the study from the control group. All the subjects in the control group were right handed.

Procedures

This study was conducted in accordance with the policies of the Human Subjects Protection Committees of the University of California, Los Angeles. Informed assents and consents were obtained from all subjects and their parents, respectively.

Language

All subjects underwent testing with the Test of Language Development (TOLD)-2 (28). This test has 3 forms: the TOLD - 2 Primary normed for children aged 4 - 8 years; the TOLD - 2 Intermediate normed for children aged 8 - 12 years; and the TOAL normed for adolescents 12 - 18 years (28). Each form of the TOLD-2 consists of a series of subtests through which it assesses both vocabulary and grammar. The TOLD manual provides normative data and findings of studies indicating reliability and validity of the instruments (28). Thirty-four subjects (25 epilepsy, 9 control) did the TOLD Primary, fifty-one the TOLD Intermediate (33 epilepsy, 18 normal), and eighteen (11 epilepsy, 7 control) the TOAL. The Spoken Language Quotient (SLQ), derived from each of these tests, was the independent variable for the study’s data analyses.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Acquisition

All subjects completed MRI scanning on a 1.5 Tesla GE Signa magnetic resonance imaging scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). The imaging acquisition protocol used to obtain high resolution three-dimensional (3D) T-1 weighted spoiled grass (SPGR) sequences included a sagittal plane acquisition with slice thickness of 1.2 mm, repetition time of 24 ms, echo time of 9 ms, flip angle of 22, acquisition matrix of 256 × 192, FOV 24, and two excitations. A detailed description of the MRI procedures, image preprocessing, delineation of the prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral frontal cortex/middle frontal gyrus, dorsolateral frontal cortex/superior frontal gyrus, orbital frontal cortex, temporal lobe, and intra- as well as inter-rater reliability can be found in Daley et al. (29) and for the superior temporal lobe and its parcellations, the anterior and posterior superior temporal lobe, in Taylor et al. (30).

Data Analysis

We compared SLQ scores as well as total brain, gray and white matter volumes between the children with and without epilepsy using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Frontal and temporal volumes were compared across groups using repeated measures ANCOVAs with hemisphere (left, right) as the within-subject variable and group as the between-subject variable. Separate analyses were conducted for each of the frontal and temporal volumes. Demographic (i.e., age, gender, and ethnicity) variables and Performance IQ were used as covariates in all these analyses since both brain development (31) and the maturation of language (32) are related to these variables.

For the within group analyses of the relationship of SLQ with fronto-temporal volumes, we estimated general linear mixed models with the volumes as the dependent variables, SLQ as the predictor and age, gender, and ethnicity as covariates. We did not control for Performance IQ because SLQ and Performance IQ are highly correlated with each other in both subject groups (control: r = .57, p < .0005; epilepsy: r = .47, p < .0001). Retaining highly correlated predictors in the models leads to multicollinearity, and this can invalidate the results by skewing the individual coefficients as well as the associated tests of significance.

Given the previously described relationship of psychiatric diagnosis with fronto-temporal volumetric abnormalities (23-27) and the exclusion of control subjects with a psychiatric diagnosis, within the epilepsy group, we conducted secondary analyses to determine whether the associations between SLQ scores and the fronto-temporal volumes were moderated by the presence/type of psychiatric diagnosis. To determine this, we included psychiatric diagnosis and its interaction with SLQ scores as additional predictors in the regression. A significant interaction term would indicate a differential association between fronto-temporal volumes and SLQ scores in the groups of subjects (presence vs. absence of a psychiatric diagnosis

Within the epilepsy group, we classified subjects as having linguistic deficits if they had average language scores 1SD below the population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. These two subgroups of epilepsy subjects were compared on their seizure variables, including type of seizure (CPS vs. CAE), EEG lateralization and localization, age of onset, seizure frequency, and number of AEDs. We then compared those subjects with average language scores to those with linguistic deficits on their regional gray and white matter volumes using repeated measures ANCOVAs. Hemisphere (left, right) was used as the within-subject variable and group was used as the between-subject variable. Separate models were estimated for each of the frontal and temporal volumes. We also examined the association of SLQ with fronto-temporal volumes within each of these two subgroups of epilepsy subjects using general linear models as described before for the within-normal and within-epilepsy groups. All tests were two-tailed and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted.

Results

Mean Language Scores and Volumes

ANCOVA controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and Performance IQ scores demonstrated that the SLQ scores of the epilepsy subjects (Mean: 95, SD: 16.77) were significantly lower (F (1,97) = 7.78, p < .006) than those of the control group (Mean: 105, SD: 15.96). Repeated measures ANCOVAs of fronto-temporal volumes controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and Performance IQ demonstrated significantly smaller orbital frontal gyrus gray matter volumes in the epilepsy group compared to the control group (Table 2).

Table 2
Fronto-Temporal Volumes in Epilepsy and Healthy Control Groups

Within the control group, general linear mixed models of fronto-temporal volumes revealed an association of higher mean SLQ scores with larger total brain volumes (F (1,30) = 4.09, p < .06), both gray (F (1,30) = 5.07, p < .04) and white matter volumes (F (1,44) = 3.27, p < .08), as well as with larger gray (F (1,30) = 4.36, p < .05) and white matter dorsolateral prefrontal volumes (F (1,30) = 4.72, p < .04). In contrast, within the epilepsy group, these analyses demonstrated a significant association of SLQ with gray matter volumes of the inferior frontal gyrus (F (1,65) = 4.53, p < .04), the temporal lobe (F (1,65) = 5.23, p < .03), and the superior temporal gyrus (F (1,42) = 5.85, p < .02). Post hoc testing of the superior temporal lobe gyrus findings demonstrated a significant positive association of SLQ with gray matter volumes for the posterior superior temporal gyrus (F (1,42) = 4.27, p < .04).

To determine if the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis in 48% of the epilepsy subjects (Table 1) was related to the SLQ/volume findings in this group, we conducted secondary analyses. Mixed models of the fronto-temporal volumes did not yield a significant interaction between the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis and SLQ/volume associations.

Epilepsy Subjects With and Without Linguistic Deficits

As evident from Table 3, the 25 (36%) epilepsy subjects with mean SLQ scores one standard deviation below the general population mean were significantly older (10.8 (3.04) vs. 9.3 (2.81) years; t (67) 2.57, p < .02) than the subgroup without linguistic deficits. However, there were no significant differences in the seizure variables of the epilepsy subjects with and without impaired language.

Table 3
Seizure Variables in Epilepsy Subjects With/Without Linguistic Deficits1

Above and beyond the age differences, the children with linguistic deficits had significantly smaller gray matter volumes of the superior temporal gyrus (F (1,44) = 3.93, p < .05) than those with normal mean SLQ scores. Post hoc testing of the superior temporal gyrus findings revealed significantly smaller anterior superior temporal gyrus (F (1,44) = 3.77, p < .05) in the children with linguistic deficits compared to those without these impairments.

The epilepsy subjects with average language scores showed a significant positive association of SLQ with gray matter volumes of the inferior frontal gyrus (F (1,40) = 5.01, p < .03) and the temporal lobe (F (1,38) = 7.22, p < .01) in contrast to the previously described positive association with total brain and dorsolateral prefrontal gray and white matter volumes in the control group. For the epilepsy subjects with language deficits, on the other hand, higher SLQ scores were associated with smaller gray matter dorsolateral prefrontal volumes (F (1,21) = 4.12, p < .05).

Discussion

This first study on language and fronto-temporal volumes in children with epilepsy highlights discrepancies in brain regions associated with language skill in the children with epilepsy compared to the normal children. Thus, overall language functioning, measured by mean SLQ, was positively related to gray and white matter total brain and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volumes in the normal group but to gray matter volumes of the inferior frontal gyrus, temporal lobe, and posterior superior temporal gyrus in the epilepsy group as a whole and in the subgroup with average linguistic skills. The presence of linguistic deficits within the epilepsy group was associated with smaller anterior superior temporal gyrus gray matter volumes and a negative association between language function and dorsolateral prefrontal gyrus gray matter volumes but not with seizure variables.

The association of SLQ with total brain volume and dorsolateral prefrontal volumes, both gray and white, in the control group supports Richardson and Price’s (33) conclusion in their review of structural MRI studies of language function in the undamaged brain that “a higher quantity of the neural substrate being measured represents better performance on a given task.” In addition, the linguistic competence of normal adults (34-36) and children (37) involve executive functions subserved by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, such as attention and working memory. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of typically developing children also demonstrate increased cortical activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during syntax, semantics, and discourse coherence tasks (38, 39).

In the epilepsy group as a whole and in the subgroup with average SLQ scores the a relationship of SLQ with inferior frontal gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and temporal lobe gray matter volumes rather than with dorsolateral prefrontal volumes implies structural reorganization of the brain that subserves normal language function in these children. Several lines of evidence support this explanation of the study’s findings.

First, the inferior frontal gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and temporal lobe are involved in a wide range of linguistic skills (See reviews in (40) and (41)). Second, fMRI connectivity studies in typically developing children identify a normal age-related top down control of linguistic processing by the inferior frontal gyrus on posterior language-related regions of the temporal lobe, including the posterior superior temporal gyrus (8, 42). Third, the association of younger age of onset with atypical language representation in an fMRI study of 45 subjects with localization related epilepsy, aged 9 - 57 years, during a word definition task suggests that intra-hemispheric and inter-hemispheric reorganization of language processing occurs during childhood (43). Fourth, recent fMRI studies also demonstrate decreased left lateralization of cortical activity, particularly in the inferior frontal region during a silent verb generation task in children with benign rolandic epilepsy (13), as well as reduced resting connectivity in a language network that includes the left inferior frontal gyrus in adults with left temporal lobe epilepsy (44).

Unlike the epilepsy subjects with normal linguistic scores, the structural reorganization involving a negative rather than positive relationship of language function with dorsolateral prefrontal gyrus gray matter volumes and smaller anterior temporal gyrus gray matter volumes in the children with linguistic deficits was related to language impairment. What determines functional versus dysfunctional language-related structural reorganization is yet to be determined. However, Mbwana et al. (43) also identified limitations to the plasticity of language network reorganization in localization related epilepsy in their study of neural networks for processing language.

Thus, in addition to the previously reported abnormal lateralization of language in children with epilepsy (10-14), our findings suggest differential involvement of language-related brain regions in normal and impaired linguistic functioning of children with epilepsy. Similar to the dissociation between IQ and fronto-temporal volumes in children with recent onset (45) and chronic epilepsy (29, 46) compared to healthy control subjects, different brain regions also appear to be involved in the linguistic skill of children with epilepsy.

Smaller anterior superior temporal gyrus gray matter volumes and SLQ scores one standard deviation below the population mean and older age in the epilepsy subjects with language impairment imply abnormal maturation of this brain region in these children. Thus, there is an age-related decrease in activation of the anterior superior temporal gyrus during auditory processing of phonological tasks as healthy children use more abstract orthographic processing and invoke the posterior superior temporal gyrus and its connections with the inferior frontal gyrus (47). Functional imaging studies of typically developing children also demonstrate participation of this brain region in the generation of verbs (48) and the comprehension of an auditory narrative task (49).

No evidence for a relationship between type of epilepsy and mean language scores for the epilepsy group as a whole and between seizure variables and the presence/absence of linguistic deficits, suggests that brain reorganization is unrelated to on-going illness effects. However, a prior study on a large sample of 182 children with epilepsy found an association of SLQ with seizure frequency, duration of illness, and history of prolonged seizures, but not with type of epilepsy and EEG findings (2). Our findings in the current study, therefore, emphasize the importance of additional studies on larger samples of children with epilepsy to determine how brain structure and seizure variables affect the development of language in these children.

Despite significantly smaller orbital frontal gray matter volumes in the epilepsy compared to the normal group, we found no association of volumes in this brain region with either language skill or deficits. Yet, the orbital frontal gyrus plays a role in the propagation of complex partial seizures (50), the onset of absence seizures (51), semantics (52, 53), distinction between content and function words (54), as well as in the discourse deficits found in children with epilepsy (55). Different orbital frontal gyrus regions subserve diverse functions, including language and regulation of social behavior through the integration of factual knowledge and emotional patterns (See review in (56)). Our negative findings might, therefore, reflect measurement of total rather than regional volumes within the orbital frontal gyrus.

The findings of our study are limited by the small sample size of the normal subjects (n = 34) relative to the epilepsy subjects (n = 69), SLQ based on different age-related forms of the TOLD, higher Performance IQ scores in the control group, the exclusion of normal subjects with a psychiatric diagnosis, and multiple statistical comparisons. Computing SLQ scores from three different age-related forms of the language instrument - the TOLD primary, the TOAL Intermediate, and the TOAL - limits generalization of the study’s findings, and does not rule out undiagnosed linguistic deficits.

Although we controlled for Performance IQ in the between group comparisons of SLQ and volumes, given the significant correlation of SLQ with Performance IQ, the different patterns of relationship between SLQ and fronto-temporal volumes might not be generalizable to epilepsy and normal subjects with similar mean PIQ scores. Exclusion of children with a psychiatric diagnosis in the normal group did not contribute to the different SLQ/fronto-temporal volume associations in the normal and epilepsy groups. Finally, although we computed multiple statistical comparisons, all statistical tests were two-tailed and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted for all inferences.

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate abnormal development of language related brain regions in medically treated children with epilepsy who have with average intelligence and no neuroradiological findings. In addition, they imply differential reorganization of brain regions subserving language in children with epilepsy with normal linguistic skills and in those with impaired language.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant NS32070 (R.C.). We appreciate the technical assistance of Erin Lanphier, Ph.D., Pamela Vona, M.A., Keng Nei Wu, B.A., and Lesley Stahl, Ph.D. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Rochelle Caplan, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry.

Jennifer Levitt, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry.

Prabha Siddarth, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry.

Suresh Gurbani, Department of Pediatrics, University of California at Irvine.

W. Donald Shields, UCLA Departments of Pediatrics.

Raman Sankar, UCLA Departments of Pediatrics.

References

1. Fastenau PSP, Johnson CSM, Perkins SMP, Byars AWP, deGrauw TJMDP, Austin JKD, Dunn DWM. Neuropsychological status at seizure onset in children: Risk factors for early cognitive deficits. Neurology. 2009;73:526–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Caplan R, Siddarth P, Vona P, Stahl L, Bailey CE, Gurbani S, Sankar R, Donald WD. Language in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2397–407. [PubMed]
3. Berman R, Nir-Sagiv B. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes. 2007;43:79–120.
4. Nippold M, Hesketh LJ, Duthie JK, Mansfield TC. Conversational versus expository discourse: a study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48:1048–64. [PubMed]
5. Ravid D. Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun Scale analyses. J Child Lang. 2006;33:791–821. [PubMed]
6. Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, Nugent TF, 3rd, Herman DH, Clasen LS, Toga AW, Rapoport JL, Thompson PM. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8174–9. [PubMed]
7. Shaw P, Kaban NJ, Lerch JP, Eckstrand K, Lenroot R, Gogtay N, Greenstein D, Clasen L, Evans A, Rapoport JL, Giedd JN, Wise SP. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3586–94. [PubMed]
8. Bitan T, Burman DD, Lu D, Cone NE, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, Booth JR. Weaker top-down modulation from the left inferior frontal gyrus in children. Neuroimage. 2006;15:991–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Lenroot RK, Giedd J. Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:718. [PubMed]
10. Berl M, Balsamo L, Xu B, Moore E, Weinstein S, Conry J, Pearl P, Sachs B, Grandin C, Frattali C, Ritter F, Sato S, Theodore W, Gaillard W. Seizure focus affects regional language networks assessed by fMRI. Neurology. 2005;65:1604–11. [PubMed]
11. Gaillard W, Berl M, Moore E, Ritzl E, Rosenberger L, Weinstein S, Conry J, Pearl P, Ritter F, Sato S, Vezina L, Vaidya C, Wiggs E, Fratalli C, Risse G, Ratner N, Gioia G, Theodore W. Atypical language in lesional and nonlesional complex partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2007;69:1761–71. [PubMed]
12. Yuan W, Szaflarski JP, Schmithorst VJ, Schapiro M, Byars AW, Strawsburg RH, Holland SK. fMRI shows atypical language lateralization in pediatric epilepsy patients. Epilepsia. 2006;47:593–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Lillywhite L, Saling MM, Harvey AS, Abbott DF, Archer JS, Vears DF, Scheffer IE, Jackson GD. Neuropsychological and functional MRI studies provide converging evidence of anterior language dysfunction in BECTS. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2276–84. [PubMed]
14. Kadis D, Kerr EN, Rutka JT, Snead O Carter, III, Weiss SK, Smith ML. Pathology type does not predict language lateralization in children with medically intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2009;50:1498–504. [PubMed]
15. Byars A, deGrauw TJ, Johnson CS, Fastenau PS, Perkins SM, Egelhoff JC, Kalnin A, Dunn DW, Austin JK. The association of MRI findings and neuropsychological functioning after the first recognized seizure. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1067–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Caplan R, Levitt J, Siddarth P, Taylor J, Daley M, Wu KN, Gurbani S, Shields WD, Sankar R. Thought disorder and fronto-temporal volumes in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:593–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Hollingshead A. Medical sociology: A brief review. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973;51:531–42. [PubMed]
18. Wechsler D. Weschsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 3rd Edition (WISC-III) The Psychological Corporation; San Antonio: 1991.
19. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children Present and Lifetime version (K SADS PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:980–8. [PubMed]
20. Caplan R, Siddarth P, Gurbani S, Ott D, Sankar R, Shields WD. Psychopathology and pediatric complex partial seizures: seizure -related, cognitive, and linguistic variables. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1273–86. [PubMed]
21. Commission on classification and terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 1989;30:389–99. Commission. [PubMed]
22. Soper H, Satz P, Orsini DL, Van Groop WG, Green M. Handedness distribution in a residential population with severe or profound mental retardation 2. Amer J Ment Defic. 1987;92:94–102. [PubMed]
23. Castellanos F, Lee PP, Sharp W, Jeffries NO, Greenstein DK, Clasen LS, Blumenthal JD, James RS, Ebens CL, Walter JM, Zijdenbos A, Evans AC, Giedd JN, Rapoport JL. Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA. 2002;288:1740–8. [PubMed]
24. Caetano S, Fonseca M, Hatch JP, Olvera RL, Nicoletti M, Hunter K, Lafer B, Pliszka SR, Soares JC. Medial temporal lobe abnormalities in pediatric unipolar depression. Neurosci Lett. 2007;427:142–7. [PubMed]
25. Steingard R, Renshaw PF, Hennen J, L M, Cintron CB, Young AD, Connor DF, Au TH, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Smaller frontal lobe white matter volumes in depressed adolescents. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:413–7. [PubMed]
26. Szeszko P, Christian C, Macmaster F, Lencz T, Mirza Y, Taormina SP, Easter P, Rose M, Michalopoulou GA, Rosenberg DR. Gray matter structural alterations in psychotropic drug-naive pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: an optimized voxel-based morphometry study. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:1229–33. [PubMed]
27. De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Shifflett H, Iyengar S, Dahl RE, Axelson DA, Birmaher B, Hall J, Moritz G, Ryan ND. Superior temporal gyrus volumes in pediatric generalized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51:553–62. [PubMed]
28. Newcomer PL, Hammil DD. Test of Language Development-2 Primary. Pro-ed; Austin: 1988.
29. Daley M, Levitt J, Siddarth P, Mormino E, Hojatkashani C, Gurbani S, Shields WD, Sankar R, Toga A, Caplan R. Frontal and temporal volumes in children with complex partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;10:470–6. [PubMed]
30. Taylor JL, Blanton RE, Levitt JG, Caplan R, Nobel D, Toga AW. Superior temporal gyrus differences in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;73:235–41. [PubMed]
31. Hackman DA, Farah MJ. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13:65–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Noble K, McCandliss BD, Farah MJ. Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Dev Sci. 2007;10:464–80. [PubMed]
33. Richardson F, Price CJ. Structural MRI studies of language function in the undamaged brain. Brain Struct Funct. 2009;213:511–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Kuperberg GR, Lakshmanan BM, Caplan DN, Holcomb PJ. Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. NeuroImage. 2006;33:343. [PubMed]
35. Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:393–402. [PubMed]
36. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of Language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:151–88. [PubMed]
37. Im-Bolter N, Johnson J, Pascual-Leone J. Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Dev. 2006;77:1822–41. [PubMed]
38. Borofsky L, McNealy K, Siddarth P, Wu KN, Dapretto M, Caplan R. Semantic processing and thought disorder in childhood-onset schizophrenia: Insights from fMRI. J Neuroling Res. 2009 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Dapretto M, Lee SS, Caplan R. A functional magnetic resonance study of discourse coherence in typically developing children. NeuroReport. 2005;16:1661–5. [PubMed]
40. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2767–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Friederici AD. Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cogn Sci. 2009;13:175–81. [PubMed]
42. Bitan T, Cheon J, Lu D, Burman DD, JR B. Developmental Increase in top-down and bottom-up processing in a phonological task: An effective connectivity, fMRI Study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21:1135–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Mbwana J, Berl MM, Ritzl EK, Rosenberger L, Mayo J, Weinstein S, Conry JA, Pearl PL, Shamim S, Moore EN, Sato S, Vezina LG, Theodore WH, Gaillard WD. Limitations to plasticity of language network reorganization in localization related epilepsy. Brain. 2009;132:347–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Waites A, Briellmann RS, Saling MM, Abbott DF, Jackson GD. Functional connectivity networks are disrupted in left temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:335–43. [PubMed]
45. Hermann B, Jones J, Sheth R, Dow C, Koehn M, Seidenberg M. Children with new-onset epilepsy: Neuropsychological status and brain structure. Brain. 2006;129:2609–19. [PubMed]
46. Caplan R, Levitt J, Siddarth P, Wu KN, Gurbani S, Sankar R, Shields WD. Frontal and temporal volumes in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2466–72. [PubMed]
47. Bitan T, Cheon J, Lu D, Burman DD, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, JR B. Developmental changes in activation and effective connectivity in phonological processing. Neuroimage. 2007;38:564–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Schapiro M, Schmithorst VJ, Wilke M, Byars AW, Strawsburg RH, Holland SK. BOLD fMRI signal increases with age in selected brain regions in children. Neuroreport. 2004;15:2575–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Schmithorst V, Holland SK, Plante E. Cognitive modules utilized for narrative comprehension in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroImage. 2006;29:254–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Gloor P. The Temporal Lobe and the Limbic System. Oxford University Press; New York: 1997.
51. Holmes M, Brown M, Tucker DM. Are “generalized” seizures truly generalized? Evidence of localized mesial frontal and frontopolar discharges in absence. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1568–79. [PubMed]
52. Duffau H, Gatignol P, Mandonnet E, Peruzzi P, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Capelle L. New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: a study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. Brain. 2005;128:797–810. [PubMed]
53. Mandonnet E, Nouet A, Gatignol P, Capelle L, Duffau H. Does the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus play a role in language? A brain stimulation study. Brain. 2007;130:623–9. [PubMed]
54. Diaz MT, McCarthy G. A comparison of brain activity evoked by single content and function words: An fMRI investigation of implicit word processing. Brain Research. 2009;1282:38–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Caplan R, Levitt J, Siddarth P, Taylor J, Daley M, Wu KN, Gurbani S, Shields WD, Sankar R. Thought disorder and fronto-temporal volumes in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:593–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Gansler DA, McLaughlin NCR, Iguchi L, Jerram M, Moore DW, Bhadelia R, Fulwiler C. A multivariate approach to aggression and the orbital frontal cortex in psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2009;171:145–54. [PubMed]