Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 27.
Published in final edited form as:
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 August; 63(8): 809–812.
PMCID: PMC2892727

Association of Longer Telomeres With Better Health in Centenarians


Prior animal model studies have demonstrated an association between telomere length and longevity. Our study examines telomere length in centenarians in good health versus poor health. Using DNA from blood lymphocytes, telomere length was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 38 sex- and age-matched centenarians (ages 97–108). “Healthy” centenarians (n = 19) with physical function in the independent range and the absence of hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, cancer, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes were compared to centenarians with physical function limitations and ≥2 of the above conditions (n = 19). Healthy centenarians had significantly longer telomeres than did unhealthy centenarians (p = .0475). Our study demonstrated that investigations of the association between telomere length and exceptional longevity must take into account the health status of the individuals. This raises the possibility that perhaps it is not exceptional longevity but one's function and health that may be associated with telomere length.

Keywords: Telomere length, Centenarian, Longevity, Morbidity

TELOMERES consist of hundreds to thousands of copies of a uniform double-stranded DNA sequence that caps the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres shorten with cell division in somatic cells. In 1965, Leonard Hayflick discovered that there was a limit to the number of cell divisions that a cell could give rise to (termed the “Hayflick Limit”) (1). Telomere length, in turn, appears to be a determinant of the Hayflick Limit. Consistent with this idea, previous investigations have demonstrated an association between telomere length and longevity in animal models (23).

Human studies examining the relationship between telomere length and mortality have demonstrated mixed results. Cawthon and colleagues (4), in their study of individuals 60 years old or older, demonstrated that the overall mortality rate of persons with short telomeres was nearly double that of individuals with long telomeres. Disease-specific mortality was also associated with shorter telomere length: Among persons with heart disease or infectious diseases, mortality was 3-fold and 8-fold greater, respectively, for persons with relatively short telomeres (4). Prior studies have demonstrated that shorter telomere length is associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease (58), dementia (9,10), and insulin resistance (11). Njajou and colleagues (12) demonstrated a positive correlation between life span and telomere length, although the age range of the subsample in which this was examined was not specified.

In contrast, studies of the oldest old have not demonstrated any relationship between telomere length, mortality, and/or morbidity. The Leiden 85+ Study examined baseline and follow-up telomere length measurements in individuals 85 years old or older; they demonstrated that baseline measurements were not predictive of mortality or dementia (13). Similarly, a Danish study of individuals 73–101 years old demonstrated that age-adjusted telomere length was not predictive of survival (14).

Using samples from the New England Centenarian Study (NECS), we set out to examine the role of telomere length and health in the oldest old. More specifically, we hypothesized that the centenarians in good health would have significantly longer telomeres than centenarians in poor health and that perhaps it is not exceptional longevity but one's health and function that is associated with telomere length.


Details of the study's recruitment and enrollment methods have been previously published (15). Briefly, the NECS is a cross-sectional study of individuals (age 97–119), their family members, and a referent cohort for the centenarian offspring who live in the United States and Canada. The NECS protocol is approved and monitored by the Boston University Medical Center Institutional Review Board, and all participants or their proxies provided written informed consent.

Health and physical function data used in this analysis were previously collected by telephone interview and/or by mail. A family member or friend assisted with completion of the questionnaires in cases in which the participant was unable to complete the questionnaires independently. A validated health questionnaire (15) was used to determine the presence, history of, or absence of the following diseases: hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, cancer, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes. We used the Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Index, a validated instrument, to assess ADL (scores range from 0 to 100) (16).

“Healthy” centenarians were defined as those individuals with a Barthel score >90 (independent range) and the absence of all of the following diseases: hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, cancer, stroke, COPD, and diabetes. “Unhealthy” centenarians had Barthel scores <80 (requiring at least some assistance) and two or more of the above diseases.

Using native DNA from whole blood, we measured telomere length by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) as described by Cawthon (17), with minor modifications. In this assay, the QPCR signal from the telomere repeats, “t”, is normalized to the QPCR signal from a nuclear single copy gene, “s”, to yield a “t/s ratio,” which is proportional to the average telomere length per cell. Telomere primers were tel1b, 5′-cggtttgtttgggtttgggtttgggtttgggtttgggtt-3′, final concentration 100 nM; and tel2b, 5′-ggcttgccttacccttacccttacccttacccttaccct-3′, final concentration 900 nM. Single copy gene (β-globin) primers were hbg1, 5′-gcttctg acacaactgtgttcactagc-3′, final concentration 300 nM; and hbg2, 5′-caccaacttcatccacgttcacc-3′, final concentration 700 nM.

To obtain the average telomere length in base pairs (bp) of DNA for the reference DNA, we used this same reference DNA to determine the t/s ratios of 64 DNA samples with known mean terminal restriction fragment (TRF) lengths (17). The slope of the linear regression line through a plot of t/s ratio (x axis) versus mean TRF length (y axis) is the number of bp of telomeric DNA corresponding to a single t/s unit. Because the reference DNA has a t/s ratio of 1.0, by definition, this slope is also the average telomere length of the reference DNA sample, 4270 bp in our case. The approximate average telomere length in bp of any research participant's DNA sample can be obtained by multiplying the participant's t/s ratio by 4270 bp.

Telomere length was measured in age- and sex-matched pairs of healthy (n = 19) and unhealthy centenarians (n = 19). The participants ranged in age from 97 to 108 years (mean age 102.5 years) and consisted of 9 male and 10 female pairs. Telomere length was then compared between the two groups using conditional logistic regression, which allows for the analysis of a dichotomous trait (healthy vs unhealthy) while accounting for the 1:1 case–control matched-pair design. The regression model was adjusted for the matching variables, age and sex. Sex-specific, age-adjusted mean telomere lengths were then compared with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). All analyses were done using SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Demographic details including age, sex, mean ADL score, and mean number of comorbidities are noted in Table 1. Healthy centenarians (n = 19) had significantly longer telomeres than unhealthy centenarians had (n = 19, p = .0475). The mean telomere length among healthy centenarians was 5770.8 ± 3132.3 bp (median = 4853.46 bp), whereas the mean telomere length amongunhealthy centenarians was 3657.2 ± 2019.2 bp (median = 3397.2 bp), as shown in Figure 1. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend of female healthy centenarians having longer mean telomere length than male healthy centenarians, as shown in Table 2. There were no differences in unhealthy women versus men.

Figure 1
Mean telomere length measured in base pairs (bp) in 19 healthy versus 19 unhealthy centenarians. Bars: interquartile ranges (Q75%–Q25%) of telomere length. Diamonds: mean; horizontal line within bars: median telomere lengths. Vertical lines: overall ...
Table 1
Demographics, Health Characteristics, and Disease Prevalence in Healthy Versus Unhealthy Centenarians
Table 2
Mean Telomere Length Measured in Base Pairs in Female (N = 10) Versus Male (N = 9) Centenarians


Our results suggest that healthy centenarians have significantly longer telomeres than unhealthy centenarians have. Compared to the other studies examining telomere length in older individuals, our study was unique in that we matched pairs by both age and sex. Sex matching is important because telomere length is typically longer in women than in men of the same age (18,19). By matching pairs by age, we were able to reduce the effect of survivor bias. In addition, we were able to take into account the effect of age-related diseases and function on telomere length.

Previous studies have failed to demonstrate an association between telomere length and mortality in the oldest old. The Leiden 85+ Study of individuals 85 years old or older demonstrated that baseline measurements were not predictive of mortality or dementia (13). A Danish study of individuals 73–101 years old by Bischoff and colleagues (14) demonstrated that longer telomeres were associated with improved survival, but this association disappeared after age adjustment. In contrast to these studies, the results from this study suggest that perhaps it is not exceptional longevity but one's health and function (e.g., frailty) that is associated with telomere length. Recently, work by Epel and colleagues (20) demonstrated that women with higher levels of perceived stress have shorter telomere length. Perceived stress was not measured in our study.

Prior research by the NECS has demonstrated three subphenotypes of centenarians: survivors (develop age-related morbidities prior to age 80), delayers (develop age-related morbidities at or after age 80 and before age 100), and escapers (survive to age 100 without any major age-related morbidities) (21). Using a larger sample of healthy and unhealthy centenarians may allow one to examine the relationship of telomere length to these three subphenotypes.

One remarkable finding is that the mean telomere length measurements for the healthy participants, 5.7 kilobasepairs (kbp), in our sample of individuals 97–108 years old are at the higher end of the range and/or above the average compared to other studies that have similarly aged as well as younger individuals. The Leiden 85+ Study demonstrated an average telomere length in their 85- to 101-year-old population ranging between 2 and 10 kbp, with most individuals having an average telomere length of about 4 kbp (13). The 2006 study by Bischoff and colleagues (14) demonstrated an average telomere length of 2.6–9.5 (subtracting 2 kb for the subtelomeric portion) for individuals 73–101 years old.

Telomeres are typically longer in women compared to similarly aged men. The results of our study were no exception. The literature suggests several explanations for this difference: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) may be stimulated by estrogen, resulting in increased telomerase and longer telomeres. Another possibility is that men may experience more oxidative damage, resulting in accelerated telomere erosion (22). A third explanation has been attributed to the mode of inheritance of telomere length, although this is still a source of debate (22,23).

Ultimately, using positive associations between healthy longevity and telomere length may be critical piece of the puzzle of the genetics of exceptional longevity. Phenotyping larger samples sizes as well as the increased availability and feasibility of genome-wide chips will hopefully facilitate such investigations.


The work was supported by National Institute on Aging grants U19 AG23122 (subcontract to D.T.), K23 AG026754–Paul Beeson Physician Faculty Scholar in Aging Awards (to D.T.), and K24 AG025727 (to T.P.).

We thank Teresa Stepanek for helping Dr. Cawthon perform the telomere length assays.


1. Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1965;37:614–636. [PubMed]
2. Rudolph KL, Chang S, Lee HW, et al. Longevity, stress response, and cancer in aging telomerase-deficient mice. Cell. 1999;96:701–712. [PubMed]
3. Joeng KS, Song EJ, Lee KJ, Lee J. Long lifespan in worms with long telomeric DNA. Nat Genet. 2004;36:607–611. [PubMed]
4. Cawthon RM, Smith KR, O'Brien E, Sivatchenko A, Kerber RA. Association between telomere length in blood and mortality in people aged 60 years or older. Lancet. 2003;361:393–395. [PubMed]
5. Benetos A, Okuda K, Lajemi M, et al. Telomere length as an indicator of biological aging: the gender effect and relation with pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity. Hypertension. 2001;37(2 Part 2):381–385. [PubMed]
6. Benetos A, Gardner JP, Zureik M, et al. Short telomeres are associated with increased carotid atherosclerosis in hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 2004;43:182–185. [PubMed]
7. Brouilette S, Singh RK, Thompson JR, Goodall AH, Samani NJ. White cell telomere length and risk of premature myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:842–846. [PubMed]
8. Samani NJ, Boultby R, Butler R, Thompson JR, Goodall AH. Telomere shortening in atherosclerosis. Lancet. 2001;358:472–473. [PubMed]
9. Panossian LA, Porter VR, Valenzuela HF, et al. Telomere shortening in T cells correlates with Alzheimer's disease status. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:77–84. [PubMed]
10. Honig LS, Schupf N, Lee JH, Tang MX, Mayeux R. Shorter telomeres are associated with mortality in those with APOE epsilon4 and dementia. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:181–187. [PubMed]
11. Demissie S, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, et al. Insulin resistance, oxidative stress, hypertension, and leukocyte telomere length in men from the Framingham Heart Study. Aging Cell. 2006;5:325–330. [PubMed]
12. Njajou OT, Cawthon RM, Damcott CM, et al. Telomere length is paternally inherited and is associated with parental lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12135–12139. [PubMed]
13. Martin-Ruiz CM, Gussekloo J, van Heemst D, von Zglinicki T, Westendorp RG. Telomere length in white blood cells is not associated with morbidity or mortality in the oldest old: a population-based study. Aging Cell. 2005;4:287–290. [PubMed]
14. Bischoff C, Petersen HC, Graakjaer J, et al. No association between telomere length and survival among the elderly and oldest old. Epidemiology. 2006;17:190–194. [PubMed]
15. Terry D, Sebastiani P, Andersen S, Perls T. Disentangling the roles of disability and morbidity in survival to exceptional old age. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65. [PubMed]
17. Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e47. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Aviv A. Telomeres and human somatic fitness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:871–873. [PubMed]
19. Aviv A, Valdes AM, Spector TD. Human telomere biology: pitfalls of moving from the laboratory to epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1424–1429. [PubMed]
20. Epel E, Blackburn EH, Lin J, et al. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:17312–17315. [PubMed]
21. Evert J, Lawler E, Bogan H, Perls T. Morbidity profiles of centenarians: survivors, delayers, and escapers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:232–237. [PubMed]
22. Nawrot TS, Staessen JA, Gardner JP, Aviv A. Telomere length and possible link to X chromosome. Lancet. 2004;363:507–510. [PubMed]
23. Nordfjäll K, Larefalk A, Lindgren P, Holmberg D, Roos G. Telomere length and heredity: indications of paternal inheritance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16374–16378. [PubMed]