PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of currcardiorevLink to Publisher's site
 
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010 May; 6(2): 91–97.
PMCID: PMC2892081

Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract

Cardiovascular malformations are the most common type of birth defect and result in significant mortality worldwide. The etiology for the majority of these anomalies remains unknown but genetic factors are being recognized as playing an increasingly important role. Advances in our molecular understanding of normal heart development have led to the identification of numerous genes necessary for cardiac morphogenesis. This work has aided the discovery of an increasing number of monogenic causes of human cardiovascular malformations. More recently, studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms and submicroscopic copy number abnormalities as having a role in the pathogenesis of congenital heart disease. This review discusses these discoveries and summarizes our increasing understanding of the genetic basis of congenital heart disease.

Keywords: Congenital heart disease, genetics, cardiac development.

INTRODUCTION

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of birth defects, and accounts for more deaths in the first year of life than any other condition when infectious etiologies are excluded [1]. With an incidence ranging from 19 to 75 per one thousand live births and present in an even greater proportion of miscarriages, CHD is an important cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide [2]. Despite advances in medical and surgical care, the etiology of CHD is still not completely understood; and with more children with CHD surviving to adulthood and starting families, it becomes even more critical to understand the origins of CHD. Classic studies including the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study have found that CHD is multifactorial, due to both genetic predisposition and environmental influences [3]. Sequencing of the human genome and advances in molecular techniques has led to increasing evidence implicating a stronger role for genetic factors.

Over the past couple of decades, there has been a greater understanding of the molecular pathways regulating cardiac development. The development of gene targeting technology has led to the generation of a multitude of mouse models with cardiac developmental defects. These studies have led to the identification of numerous transcriptional regulators, signaling molecules and structural genes that are critical for normal cardiac morphogenesis. In addition, multiple genes have been identified that are controlled by these highly conserved molecular pathways. These investigations into the molecular mechanisms of cardiac development have assisted in the identification of genetic etiologies of CHD and provide evidence that many genes may have etiologic roles in human CHD.

In this review, we will discuss the evolution of knowledge regarding genetic causes of CHD, from early evidence that aneuploidy was associated with CHD, to the later use of submicroscopic techniques such as fluorescence-in-situ hybridization, and more recently the identification of single gene mutations as a cause of CHD. We will focus on new developments in the field of cardiac genetics, specifically in relation to the importance of copy number variations and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the development of CHD.

CARDIAC MALFORMATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ANEUPLOIDY AND MICRODELETIONS

While most children born with CHD do not have other birth defects, CHD occurs in association with other anomalies or as part of an identified syndrome in 25 to 40% cases [4]. In addition, approximately 30% of children with a chromosomal abnormality will have CHD [5]. Aneuploidy, or abnormal chromosomal number, accounts for a significant proportion of CHD (Table 11). Fifty percent of individuals born with Trisomy 21 have CHD, ranging from atrial and ventricular septal defects to atrioventricular canal lesions. In Trisomy 13, the incidence increases to 80%, with heterotaxy and laterality defects becoming more common, and among individuals with Trisomy 18, nearly all will have CHD, usually in the form of septal defects. Approximately one-third of females with Turner syndrome, or monosomy X, have CHD. The malformations are usually of the left-sided cardiac structures, and the most common diagnoses include bicuspid aortic valve, aortic stenosis, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and coarctation of the aorta. In males with Klinefelter syndrome, or 47, XXY, there is a fifty percent incidence of CHD, with patent ductus arteriosus and atrial septal defects prevailing [5]. These and other less common chromosomal defects are detected in patients with CHD since the advent of the chromosomal G-banded karyotype. However, conventional karyotype analysis has a resolution of only five to ten megabases, limiting this technique in its ability to detect smaller chromosomal anomalies.

Table 1.
Common Syndromes Resulting from Anueploidy and Microdeletions

With the development of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a technique in which fluorescent labeled probes are hybridized to metaphase chromosomes to detect small submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications, several syndromes caused by chromosomal abnormalities have been elucidated (Table 11). Two classic examples include the 22q11 deletion syndrome and Williams-Beuren syndrome. The 22q11 deletion syndrome (also known as DiGeorge, velo-cardio-facial and conotruncal anomaly face syndromes) is caused by a microscopic deletion on chromosome 22q11.2, and leads to cardiac malformations along with thymic and parathyroid hypoplasia and characteristic dysmorphic facies, due to abnormal pharyngeal arch development [6]. The most common cardiac malformations are interrupted aortic arch, truncus arteriosus, and tetralogy of Fallot, and routine genetic testing is now performed in patients with these heart lesions [7]. Williams-Beuren syndrome, characterized by cardiac defects, most commonly supravalvar aortic and pulmonary stenosis as well as peripheral pulmonary stenosis, in addition to typical elfin facies, infantile hypercalcemia, renal involvement, and cognitive disability, is due to microdeletion of chromosome 7p11.23 and is also detectable by FISH [8]. The cardio-vascular defects in this syndrome were found to be due to loss of elastin, and mutations in elastin were identified in individuals with isolated supravalvar aortic stenosis [9, 10]. Although FISH is a powerful technique, it can only be utilized when there is a clinical suspicion that the constellation of symptoms is caused by a specific microdeletion, allowing one to target this area of interest. As such, FISH cannot be applied genome-wide to find novel chromosomal abnormalities.

SINGLE GENE MUTATIONS

Single Gene Defects Associated with Syndromes

With advances in genetic technology and the completion of the Human Genome Project, single gene defects leading to syndromes associated with congenital heart disease have been elucidated and they are summarized in Table 22. Some of the earliest work was the discovery that mutation of Fibrillin 1 (FBN1) was the cause of Marfan syndrome, which is characterized by progressive aortic root dilation with a predisposition to dissection, lens dislocation, and skeletal anomalies [11]. The genetic etiology was discovered using traditional positional cloning approaches and required the identification of a large kindred with multiple affected members along with a unique phenotype. Since then the genetic basis of numerous syndromes have been identified and each is characterized by a unique constellation of birth defects. Holt-Oram syndrome, characterized by atrial and ventricular septal defects, progressive atrioventricular conduction system disease, and radial limb and thumb anomalies, is associated with mutations in the transcription factor, TBX5 [12]. Alagille syndrome, caused by mutations in JAG1, a gene encoding a ligand in the Notch signaling pathway, is characterized by intrahepatic bile duct paucity and cardiovascular malformations, including peripheral pulmonic stenosis, pulmonary valve stenosis, and tetralogy of Fallot [13, 14]. Consistent with this, mutations in a NOTCH receptor, NOTCH2, have also been identified in subjects with Alagille syndrome [15]. The phenotype of Noonan syndrome consists of cardiac defects, typically pulmonary valve stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as well as cognitive disability, characteristic facies, and bleeding disorders. Initially, mutations in PTPN11, a gene involved in Ras signaling, were identified to be the cause of 50% of cases [16]. Subsequent studies have found that mutations of other genes involved in the Ras signaling pathway including RAF1, SOS1, and KRAS were also associated with a similar spectrum of disease [17-20]. In addition, LEOPARD and Costello syndromes, which exhibit a similar phenotype as Noonan syndrome, are the result of mutations in Ras signaling pathway members [21-24]. Another syndrome characterized by dysmorphic facies and digit anomalies along with congenital heart disease (specifically patent ductus arteriosus) was found to be caused by mutation in the transcription factor, TFAP2β using traditional approaches after the identification of large kindreds [25]. Lastly, heterotaxy syndrome, which is randomization of cardiac, pulmonary and gastrointestinal situs, is frequently associated with congenital heart disease, specifically atrioventricular septal defects, and transposed great arteries. A subset of these cases have been identified to be caused by mutations in ZIC3, CFC1, ACVR2B, and LEFTYA, genes that regulate left-right asymmetry in the developing embryo [26].

Table 2.
Common Syndromes Associated with CHD Resulting from Single Gene Defects

Single Gene Defects Associated with Non-syndromic Cardiac Malformations

More recently, single gene defects associated with isolated or non-syndromic congenital heart disease have been discovered (Table 33). Kindred studies revealed that mutations in NKX2.5 lead to isolated atrial septal defects with atrioventricular conduction delay [27]. Mutations in GATA4, a zinc finger transcription factor known to interact with NKX2.5, have been linked to isolated atrial septal defects without conduction system abnormalities. Interestingly, a mutation in Gata4 specifically disrupted an interaction with TBX5 suggesting that mutations in any of these interacting transcription factors can lead to CHD [28]. Myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6) mutations have been identified as another cause of atrial septal defects [29]. MYH6 is known to be activated by TBX5 and GATA4, suggesting that mutations in the common downstream targets of these genes may be a cause of cardiac septation defects. Several genes have been implicated in the genetic etiology of atrioventricular septation defects including CRELD1, ALK2, and BMPR2 [30-32]. Additionally, mutations in NOTCH1 have been identified as a cause of aortic valve malformations, including bicuspid aortic valve and early aortic valve calcification, via genome-wide linkage analysis of an affected family. Interestingly, family members with trileaflet aortic valves and NOTCH1 mutations also developed early valve calcification, indicating that NOTCH1 also plays a role in valvular calcification [33]. The identification of more severe cyanotic forms of non-syndromic CHD has been limited. The gene PROSIT240 was found to be disrupted by a balanced translocation in a patient with d-transposition of the great vessels and mental retardation, and subsequently additional patients with isolated d-TGA were found to have mutations in this gene [34]. These new developments demonstrate that single-gene defects can lead to isolated congenital heart disease, and reveal more about molecular pathways important in cardiac morphogenesis.

Table 3.
Non-Syndromic CHD Resulting from Single Gene Defects

COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Despite these advances and discoveries, the vast majority of individuals with CHD do not have single gene defects. With the sequencing of the human genome, new information about genetic diversity has been revealed. One type of genetic variation, the copy number variation (CNV), consists of intermediate-size duplications and deletions that lead to changes in gene dosage and affect about 12% of the human genome [35]. CNV are considered polymorphisms when present in >1% of the population, and are more likely to be disease-associated when occurring in <1% of individuals. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), a DNA microarray-based methodology can detect these submicroscopic CNV genome-wide.

Copy Number Variation in Human Disease

The presence of CNV encompassing a variety of different genomic regions has been shown to be strongly associated with diseases such as autism, schizophrenia, and developmental delay, along with being identified in individuals with multiple anomalies. Sebat and colleagues performed whole genome array CGH on subjects with autism spectrum disorders and their unaffected siblings and found that de novo but individually rare CNVs were significantly associated with autism [36]. More recently, a microdeletion or reciprocal microduplication of chromosome 16p11.2 was identified by array CGH in a large population of families to be significantly associated with autism in 1% of cases [37]. Similar results have been obtained using array CGH in individuals with schizophrenia where rare microdeletions and microduplications are present significantly more often in individuals with schizophrenia than in related controls. These CNV predominantly modified genes involved in neurodevelopment, suggesting that they are contributing to the development of schizophrenia [38, 39]. Array CGH has also been used to study idiopathic mental retardation, as well as mental retardation associated with dysmorphism. Multiple studies have detected abnormal chromosomal copy number associated with these clinical phenotypes, ranging from 4% to 17% of those studied [40, 41]. Across a wide spectrum of diseases, array CGH has developed into a useful tool to detect submicroscopic chromosomal anomalies that lead to disease or increase disease susceptibility.

Copy Number Variation in Congenital Heart Disease

Unique copy number variations are associated with congenital cardiac malformations. Initial studies have identified CNVs in children with CHD along with multiple other congenital anomalies. CHARGE syndrome, a constellation of anomalies including coloboma of the eye, heart defects including conotruncal and aortic arch malformations, choanal atresia, growth retardation, and ear abnormalities, was recently found to be due to a microdeletion on chromosome 8p21 [42]. Whole-genome array was initially used to screen the entire genome of individuals with CHARGE syndrome and detected a 2.3 Mb microdeletion on chromosome 8p21 in one individual. Subsequent sequencing of the critical region revealed heterozygous mutations in CHD7, a gene which encodes for a chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein that is expressed during embryogenesis, in 10 subjects, suggesting that CHD7 haploinsufficiency leads to CHARGE syndrome [42]. Subsequent studies, identified pathogenic mutations in CHD7 in over 50% of a population of 110 individuals with CHARGE syndrome (Table 22) [43]. Array CGH helped to identify the gene responsible for the majority of cases of this syndrome, demonstrating the importance of this methodology in gene discovery, especially when studying rare diseases.

Using array CGH, Thienpont and colleagues studied sixty patients with CHD and other birth anomalies and normal chromosomes by standard cytogenetics and detected rare CNV in 30%. While some of these CNV were in regions known to contain genes critical for cardiac development such as NKX2.5 and NOTCH1, the majority occurred where no known cardiac genes were located [44]. Causation was supported when CNV contained genes important in cardiac development or when they arose de novo, and this analysis suggested that 17% of the patient population harbored causative CNV. The remaining 13% of CNVs were inherited from unaffected parents, so causation could not be established. This study demonstrated that CNV are associated with CHD that occurs in association with other anomalies or developmental delay.

In another study, high-resolution whole-genome array CGH was performed to detect rare CNV in 40 individuals with CHD and normal karyotypes. Twenty had CHD and other anomalies or developmental delay, while the others had isolated CHD. Large causative CNV were identified in five individuals (25%), all with CHD and neurological abnormalities or developmental delay. The risk of having disease-causing CNV increased to 45% in those with neurological abnormalities or developmental delay. These results demonstrate that large and likely causative CNV exist in individuals with CHD especially when developmental delay or neurological anomalies are also present [45]. These recent studies demonstrate that using whole-genome array CGH to detect disease-associated CNV in individuals with CHD and neurologic anomalies can be useful if conventional genetic evaluation including karyotype is normal.

Copy number variations have also been identified in individuals with isolated CHD. Erdogan and colleagues studied 105 individuals with various types of isolated CHD and no other anomalies or evidence of developmental delay to whole genome array CGH and detected 18 rare CNV. The majority were duplications, in contrast to those found in syndromic CHD, which are predominantly deletions. Additionally, 44% were familial, also occurring in parents with no evidence of CHD, perhaps indicating that these CNV increase susceptibility to CHD but require other modifying factors to manifest the phenotype [46]. This demonstrates that rare CNV may be an important genetic contributor to isolated CHD, but in light of the significant cost for array CGH and inconclusive results to provide accurate genetic counseling, it is not yet clinically indicated in cases of isolated CHD.

SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

While copy number variations represent one type of genetic diversity, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent another. SNPs are changes in single nucleotides found throughout the genome; data from the Human Genome Project estimates that 90% of human genetic variation results from SNPs [47]. These may occur in coding or non-coding regions of the genome, and each SNP does not necessarily affect gene function. A collection of SNPs in a particular genomic region each of which is highly non-randomly associated with the others is referred to as a haplotype. Some SNPs have been shown to modify response to pharmaceutical agents, while others have been implicated in susceptibility to disease. Whole genome association studies have detected SNPs that increase susceptibility to common diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and coronary artery disease, and replication studies have confirmed these associations in multiple cohorts. SNPs that influence the development of CHD have also been identified, though the field is still in the early stages of development. The number of subjects with CHD that can be studied is relatively small due to its relative infrequency, significant phenotypic variability, and the early lethality that existed only until the last couple of decades, as such the statistical power that can be generated from whole genome studies is low. As such until now, SNP association studies in CHD have focused on detecting polymorphisms in candidate genes thought to be involved in the development of CHD.

The role of folate metabolism in the development of CHD is one area where initial association studies focused. Maternal folate supplementation is known to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects in offspring, and by a similar mechanism, appears to decrease the incidence of CHD [48]. A common polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene at position 677 changes a cytosine to a thymine (C677T) and leads to decreased activity of the enzyme. This SNP, found in about 10% of individuals of Northern European origin, has been investigated in multiple studies to determine if it confers an increased risk for CHD. A recent meta-analysis examining all studies of this MTHFR polymorphism failed to find an association between the presence of the homozygous C677T allele in either mothers or offspring and increased risk for CHD [49]. Due to the small sample sizes in the individual studies, heterogeneity in types of CHD, and unknown presence of maternal folic acid supplementation, these results remain inconclusive, and further study is required.

In numerous mouse models, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to be critical for normal heart development. Three SNPs in the promoter of VEGF (C2578A, G1154A, and C634G) had previously been shown to be a modifier of 22q11 deletion syndrome in a candidate-gene based study and this haplotype is associated with lower VEGF levels in vivo [50, 51]. Following this, family based studies using 148 trios found that the low expression VEGF haplotype was transmitted more often than expected to affected children suggesting that it may play a role in the development of isolated TOF [52]. This has been followed by the examination of VEGF SNPs with other types of CHD. The polymorphism at position -634 was found to be associated with ventricular septal defects in a Chinese population [53] and two other VEGF SNPs (-460T/C and +405G/C) also associated with decreased VEGF expression have been reported to be associated with valvuloseptal defects in a small case-control study [54]. Similar to as was seen with polymorphisms in MTHFR, a recent meta-analysis failed to demonstrate an association with VEGF genetic variations and CHD [55].

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

From congenital heart defects due to chromosomal aneuploidy to single gene defects causing isolated CHD, genetics has a much greater influence on the development of various types of CHD than previously appreciated. We are just beginning to understand the significance of copy number variations in CHD, and this field will likely serve as an important mechanism for gene discovery as the resolution of array CGH improves. Although whole-genome association studies using SNPs have been useful in studies of coronary artery disease, the relatively uncommon incidence of CHD and its phenotypic heterogeneity may limit their usefulness in single institution studies due to lack of power. Candidate gene association studies for etiologic and susceptibility genes in CHD will continue to reveal new genetic variations that may modify risk, but these studies will require replication in ethnically diverse populations to be validated. As the cost of DNA sequencing decreases, we will ultimately be able to sequence the entire genome, which may lead to an increase rate of gene discovery in CHD. As new genetic abnormalities associated with CHD are identified, development of international collaborative databases with phenotypic information will allow for the study of clinical outcomes and prognosis based on genetic backgrounds. As more knowledge is gained about the influence of genetics on CHD, strategies for the prevention of CHD or prediction of outcome will develop that will prove beneficial for future generations of children affected by CHD.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr. Meenakshi Maitra for her helpful comments and V.G. is supported by grants from NIH/NHLBI, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, and the Children’s Heart Foundation.

REFERENCES

1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890–900. [PubMed]
2. Bruneau BG. The developmental genetics of congenital heart disease. Nature. 2008;451(7181):943–8. [PubMed]
3. Ferencz C, Rubin JD, Loffredo CA, Magee CM. Perspectives in Pediatric Cardiology. Vol. 4. Mount Kisco NY: Futura Publishing Co.Inc; 1993. The epidemiology of congenital heart disease, The Baltimore-Washington Infant Study (1981-1989)
4. Bernstein D. In: Evaluation of the cardiovascular system. Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics: Philadelphia, Saunders; 2004. pp. 1481–8.
5. Pierpont ME, Basson CT, Benson DW Jr, et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2007;115(23):3015–38. [PubMed]
6. Scambler PJ. The 22q11 deletion syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(16):2421–6. [PubMed]
7. Goldmuntz E, Clark BJ, Mitchell LE, et al. Frequency of 22q11 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(2):492–8. [PubMed]
8. Ewart AK, Morris CA, Atkinson D, et al. Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nat Genet. 1993;5(1):11–6. [PubMed]
9. Ewart AK, Jin W, Atkinson D, Morris CA, Keating MT. Supravalvular aortic stenosis associated with a deletion disrupting the elastin gene. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(3):1071–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Li DY, Toland AE, Boak BB, et al. Elastin point mutations cause an obstructive vascular disease, supravalvular aortic stenosis. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(7):1021–8. [PubMed]
11. Dietz HC, Cutting GR, Pyeritz RE, et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature. 1991;352(6333):337–9. [PubMed]
12. Basson CT, Bachinsky DR, Lin RC, et al. Mutations in human TBX5 cause limb and cardiac malformation in Holt-Oram syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):30–5. [PubMed]
13. Li L, Krantz ID, Deng Y, et al. Alagille syndrome is caused by mutations in human Jagged1, which encodes a ligand for Notch1. Nat Genet. 1997;16(3):243–51. [PubMed]
14. Oda T, Elkahloun AG, Pike BL, et al. Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;16(3):235–42. [PubMed]
15. McDaniell R, Warthen DM, Sanchez-Lara PA, et al. NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(1):169–73. [PubMed]
16. Tartaglia M, Mehler EL, Goldberg R, et al. Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):465–8. [PubMed]
17. Tartaglia M, Pennacchio LA, Zhao C, et al. Gain-of-function SOS1 mutations cause a distinctive form of Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(1):75–9. [PubMed]
18. Roberts AE, Araki T, Swanson KD, et al. Germline gain-of-function mutations in SOS1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(1):70–4. [PubMed]
19. Razzaque MA, Nishizawa T, Komoike Y, et al. Germline gain-of-function mutations in RAF1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):1013–7. [PubMed]
20. Pandit B, Sarkozy A, Pennacchio LA, et al. Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):1007–12. [PubMed]
21. Kratz CP, Zampino G, Kriek M, et al. Craniosynostosis in patients with Noonan syndrome caused by germline KRAS mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(5):1036–40. [PubMed]
22. Digilio MC, Conti E, Sarkozy A, et al. Grouping of multiple-lentigines/LEOPARD and Noonan syndromes on the PTPN11 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(2):389–94. [PubMed]
23. Aoki Y, Niihori T, Narumi Y, et al. The RAS/MAPK syndromes: novel roles of the RAS pathway in human genetic disorders. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(8):992–1006. [PubMed]
24. Schubbert S, Bollag G, and Shannon K. Deregulated Ras signaling in developmental disorders: new tricks for an old dog. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17(1):15–22. [PubMed]
25. Satoda M, Zhao F, Diaz GA, et al. Mutations in TFAP2B cause Char syndrome, a familial form of patent ductus arteriosus. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):42–6. [PubMed]
26. Zhu L, Belmont JW, Ware SM. Genetics of human heterotaxias. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(1):17–25. [PubMed]
27. Schott JJ, Benson DW, Basson CT, et al. Congenital heart disease caused by mutations in the transcription factor NKX2-5. Science. 1998;281(5373):108–11. [PubMed]
28. Garg V, Kathiriya IS, Barnes R, et al. GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature. 2003;424(6947):443–7. [PubMed]
29. Ching YH, Ghosh TK, Cross SJ, et al. Mutation in myosin heavy chain 6 causes atrial septal defect. Nat Genet. 2005;37(4):423–8. [PubMed]
30. Robinson SW, Morris CD, Goldmuntz E, et al. Missense mutations in CRELD1 are associated with cardiac atrioventricular septal defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(4):1047–52. [PubMed]
31. Roberts KE, McElroy JJ, Wong WP, et al. BMPR2 mutations in pulmonary arterial hypertension with congenital heart disease. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(3):371–4. [PubMed]
32. Smith KA, Joziasse IC, Chocron S, et al. Dominant-negative ALK2 allele associates with congenital heart defects. Circulation. 2009;119(24):3062–9. [PubMed]
33. Garg V, Muth AN, Ransom JF, et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature. 2005;437(7056):270–4. [PubMed]
34. Muncke N, Jung C, Rudiger H, et al. Missense mutations and gene interruption in PROSIT240, a novel TRAP240-like gene, in patients with congenital heart defect (transposition of the great arteries) Circulation. 2003;108(23):2843–50. [PubMed]
35. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006;444(7118):444–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Malhotra D, et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science. 2007;316(5823):445–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):667–75. [PubMed]
38. Walsh T, McClellan JM, McCarthy SE, et al. Rare structural variants disrupt multiple genes in neurodevelopmental pathways in schizophrenia. Science. 2008;320(5875):539–43. [PubMed]
39. Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S, et al. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature. 2008;455(7210):232–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Stankiewicz P, Beaudet AL. Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17(3):182–92. [PubMed]
41. Vissers LE, Veltman JA, van Kessel AG, Brunner HG. Identification of disease genes by whole genome CGH arrays. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14 Spec No. 2:R215–23. [PubMed]
42. Vissers LE, van Ravenswaaij CM, Admiraal R, et al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004;36(9):955–7. [PubMed]
43. Lalani SR, Safiullah AM, Fernbach SD, et al. Spectrum of CHD7 mutations in 110 individuals with CHARGE syndrome and genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(2):303–14. [PubMed]
44. Thienpont B, Mertens L, de Ravel T, et al. Submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances detected by array-CGH are a frequent cause of congenital heart defects in selected patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(22):2778–84. [PubMed]
45. Richards AA, Santos LJ, Nichols HA, et al. Cryptic Chromosomal Abnormalities Identified in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Res. 2008;64(4):358–63. [PubMed]
46. Erdogan F, Larsen LA, Zhang L, et al. High frequency of submicroscopic genomic aberrations detected by tiling path array comparative genome hybridisation in patients with isolated congenital heart disease. J Med Genet. 2008;45(11):704–9. [PubMed]
47. The International HapMap Consortium. The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426:789–96. [PubMed]
48. Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA. Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(22):1608–14. [PubMed]
49. van Beynum IM, den Heijer M, Blom HJ, Kapusta L. The MTHFR 677C->T polymorphism and the risk of congenital heart defects: a literature review and meta-analysis. Q J Med. 2007;100(12):743–53. [PubMed]
50. Stalmans I, Lambrechts D, De Smet F, et al. VEGF: a modifier of the del22q11 (DiGeorge) syndrome? Nat Med. 2003;9(2):173–82. [PubMed]
51. Lambrechts D, Storkebaum E, Morimoto M, et al. VEGF is a modifier of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in mice and humans and protects motoneurons against ischemic death. Nat Genet. 2003;34(4):383–94. [PubMed]
52. Lambrechts D, Devriendt K, Driscoll DA, et al. Low expression VEGF haplotype increases the risk for tetralogy of Fallot: a family based association study. J Med Genet. 2005;42(6):519–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Xie J, Yi L, Xu ZF, et al. VEGF C-634G polymorphism is associated with protection from isolated ventricular septal defect: case-control and TDT studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15(12):1246–51. [PubMed]
54. Vannay A, Vasarheli B, Kornyei M, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism of VEGF gene are associated with risk of congenital valvuloseptal heart defects. Am Heart J. 2006;151(4):878–81. [PubMed]
55. Griffin HR, Hall DH, Topf A, et al. Genetic Variation in VEGF Does Not Contribute Significantly to the Risk of Congenital Cardiovascular Malformation. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4978. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Current Cardiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers