In the current studies we sought to investigate the effects of dietary soy on inflammation-induced edema, primary and secondary mechanical allodynia, and heat hyperalgesia. The soy-based diet reduced aspects of mechanical allodynia, heat hyperalgesia and edema induced by intraplantar injection of 25% CFA. However, in the carrageenan model, consumption of soy attenuated only primary mechanical allodynia. Diet did not affect intra-articular CFA-induced knee swelling or the behavioral responses in the secondary hyperalgesic region. The results of these experiments suggest that soy consumption may be beneficial in reducing primary, but not secondary, hyperalgesia in inflammatory pain conditions.
Taken together with our previously published reports, our current results suggest that beneficial effects of soy are not species or strain specific (Sprague-Dawley or Wistar (
Shir et al., 1998;
Shir et al., 2001a;
Shir et al., 2001b;
Shir et al., 2002;
Zhao et al., 2004)), not dependent on the source of soy protein (Bio Source or PMI Feeds), or on the type of thermal device (CO2 laser, radiant heat (
Shir et al., 1998;
Shir et al., 2001a;
Shir et al., 2001b;
Shir et al., 2002)) used.
Our observations suggest that the soy diet has mild, but significant, anti-inflammatory properties. Because we used a mild inflammatory dose of CFA (25%), we were able to observe a significant effect of diet on primary mechanical and heat hyperalgesia and paw edema. However, the dose of carrageenan injected was a standard dose typically used by other investigators and may cause a more intense inflammatory response that makes the effect of soy less apparent. Additionally, the differences in results can be attributed in part to the fact that CFA and carrageenan have somewhat different mechanisms of action, and a soy diet may not be equally effective at reducing both types of inflammation. For example, behavioral hyperalgesia that develops following carrageenan injection is similar to that produced by CFA in that local proinflammatory mediators, such as bradykinin, and reactive oxygen species directly activate and sensitize nociceptors (
Morris, 2003). However, although carrageenan causes an immune response demonstrable by an increase in leukocyte count, it is generally considered a non-immune inflammatory stimulus, whereas CFA is specifically used as an immunostimulatory inflammatory agent (
Stein et al., 1988;
Woolf et al., 1997;
Holmdahl et al., 2001;
Morris, 2003;
Ferreira et al., 2007).
It is also important to note that the onset of the beneficial effect of soy varied in two different inflammatory models. In the carrageenan model, inflammation-induced hyperalgesia peaks earlier (4-6 hrs after injection) than after a CFA injection (typically 24 hrs after injection). We observed that soy diet reduced mechanical allodynia earlier in the carrageenan model (4 hrs and 1 day after inflammation), than in the intraplantar CFA model (day 4). However, soy diet attenuated CFA inflammation induced edema and heat hyperalgesia overall, whereas it had no effect on those variables in the carrageenan model. Future studies need to investigate the specific influence of soy diet on various stages of the inflammatory cascade.
In primates and humans, secondary hyperalgesia following a cutaneous injury is typically characterized by increased sensitivity to mechanical but not heat stimuli in a test site away from the injury (
Raja et al., 1984;
Ali et al., 1996). Secondary hyperalgesia induced by CFA (or carrageenan) injection into the intra-articular space of the knee is atypical in this regard because animals develop increased sensitivity to both mechanical and heat stimulation of the paw following inflammatory insult. The underlying mechanisms of secondary hyperalgesia following intra-articular CFA injection have been described as being driven by central sensitization of dorsal horn neurons (
Sluka and Westlund, 1993;
Wu et al., 1998). Joint inflammation leads to increased immunoreactivity for glutamate, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and both neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthase (nNOS and iNOS, respectively) in the spinal cord (
Sluka et al., 1992;
Sluka and Westlund, 1993;
Wu et al., 1998). The absence of effect of soy in the intra-articular CFA model may suggest that soy does not alter the central processing of pain signals and that its effects are predominantly peripheral. Another line of evidence for this argument is the fact that there were no contralateral differences between soy or casein fed animals after any of the inflammatory models.
A soy diet is rich with a variety of bioactive compounds that can attenuate the peripheral inflammatory response observed after intraplantar injection of CFA. Several mechanisms have been implicated as being relevant to pain processing, such as inhibition of tyrosine kinase, direct antioxidant properties, cytokine and cyclooxygenase inhibition, and interaction with estrogen receptors (
Corbett et al., 1996;
Arora et al., 1998;
Liu et al., 2004;
Mueller et al., 2004;
Ye et al., 2004;
Comalada et al., 2006). The isoflavone from soy, genistein, has tyrosine kinase-inhibiting properties that can attenuate local nerve growth factor signaling (thereby attenuating further tissue inflammation); alternatively it can directly inhibit excitability of nociceptive dorsal root ganglion neurons (
Liu et al., 2004). However, genistein could also be expected to reduce central sensitization because tyrosine kinase inhibitors (including genistein) have been shown to reduce the expression of iNOS in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Perhaps the potency of bioactive compounds in soy at the dose ingested in these experiments was not high enough to exert both peripheral and central anti-inflammatory effects via tyrosine kinase inhibition.
Reactive oxygen species participate in cell injury and promote the inflammatory process. Phytonutrients found in soy have been shown to have excellent antioxidant properties that potentially slow the recruitment of pro-inflammatory mediators to the site of inflammation (
Arora et al., 1998). In vitro studies indicate that soy proteins inhibit cytokine release and/or cyclooxygenase activity in various cell types under inflammatory conditions (
Corbett et al., 1996;
Liang et al., 1999;
Yagasaki et al., 2001;
Ye et al., 2004;
Comalada et al., 2006). A recent report indicates that genistein relieves neuropathic pain by multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of nuclear factor kB, iNOS, nNOS, and cytokines (
Valsecchi et al., 2008).
Understanding the role of estrogen-like properties of isoflavones in pain processing is complicated by the fact that the role of estrogen hormones in pain is not clear (
Craft et al., 2004). In the central nervous system, pro-estrogenic effects of soy could have pro-nociceptive effects, as central administration of estradiol produces an enhanced licking response after intraplantar formalin injection (
Aloisi and Ceccarelli, 2000). On the other hand, systemic administration of estradiol can have anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore, it is possible that in response to inflammation, soy reduces CFA-induced pain behavior by acting on peripheral estrogen receptors (
Tada et al., 2004) but this beneficial effect is attenuated by the central pronociceptive effects of phytoestrogen in soy. Future studies will help us to determine if one or more of these mechanisms are involved in reducing primary hyperalgesia associated with CFA injection.
Our observations in models of peripheral inflammation may appear discrepant to our previously published results that soy diet reduces secondary, but not primary hyperalgesia in animal models of bone cancer (
Zhao et al., 2004). Injection of sarcoma cells into the medullary cavity of the femur bone establishes a bone cancer model of secondary hyperalgesia because the affected bone is away from the test site (i.e. the paw). Behaviorally, mechanical and heat hyperalgesia following CFA-induced knee inflammation or femur bone cancer growth may appear similar, but the underlying pain mechanisms are not the same (
Luger et al., 2002). Osteoclast mediated bone-destruction is a major mechanism suggested in bone cancer pain (
Honore et al., 2000a;
Honore et al., 2000b). Although some bone destruction may be a long term result of intraplantar CFA administration (
Chan et al., 1999), this is clearly not the primary source of CFA-induced pain behavior. Furthermore, CFA-induced primary hyperalgesia and cancer-induced primary hyperalgesia (calcaneus bone cancer model) also seem to be governed by different underlying mechanisms. The lack of lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration and the absence of obvious neuropathology at and around the tumor site suggest that cancer-induced primary hyperalgesia is not purely inflammatory or neuropathic in origin (
Wacnik et al., 2001;
Cain et al., 2001). Rather, it has been argued that the release of endothelin evokes pain in calcaneus bone cancer model (
Wacnik et al., 2001).
The fact that a soy diet reduced edema in the paw but not in the knee may potentially be attributable to differences in tissue type at the site of injection. Paws are composed mostly of soft tissue that expands much more upon inflammation than the restricted space of the knee synovium. Similarly, knee diameter might not be a sensitive measure of changes in knee edema because it is based on two points as an indication of swelling. Perhaps measuring knee volume or biochemical markers of cartilage degradation would be more accurate and would reveal a difference between soy- and casein-fed animals. For example, Arjmandi et al found a significant improvement in serum markers of cartilage degradation (glycoprotein 39 and insulin-like growth factor-I) in osteoarthritic men who consumed soy protein for 90 days compared to men who consumed milk protein (
Arjmandi et al., 2004). The results of our studies suggest that a soy rich diet may reduce primary, but not secondary, hyperalgesia in inflammatory pain conditions.