PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Chem Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2891540
NIHMSID: NIHMS106304

Nonpolar Nucleoside Mimics as Active Substrates for Human Thymidine Kinases

Abstract

We describe the use of nonpolar nucleoside analogs of systematically varied size and shape to probe the mechanisms by which the two human thymidine kinases (TK1 and TK2) recognize and phosphorylate their substrate, thymidine. Comparison of polar thymidine with a nonpolar isostere, 2,4-difluorotoluene deoxyriboside, as substrates for the two enzymes establishes that TK1 requires electrostatic complementarity to recognize the thymine base with high efficiency. Conversely, TK2 does not, and phosphorylates the hydrophobic shape mimic with efficiency nearly the same as the natural substrate. To test the response to nucleobase size, thymidine-like analogs were systematically varied by replacing the 2,4 substituents on toluene with hydrogen and the halogen series (H,F,Cl,Br,I). Both enzymes showed a distinct preference for substrates having the natural size. To examine the shape preference, we prepared four mono- and difluorotoluene deoxyribosides with varying positions of substitutions. While TK1 did not accept these nonpolar analogs as substrates, TK2 did show varying levels of phosphorylation of the shape-varied set. This latter enzyme preferred toluene nucleoside analogs having steric projections at the 2 and 4 positions, as is found in thymine, and strongly disfavored substitution at the 3-position. Steady-state kinetics measurements showed that the 4-fluoro compound (7) had an apparent Vmax/Km value within 14-fold of the natural substrate, and the 2,4-difluoro compound (1), which is the closest isostere of thymidine, had a value within 2.5-fold. The results establish that nucleoside recognition mechanisms for the two classes of enzymes are very different. Based on this data, nonpolar nucleosides are likely to be active in the nucleotide salvage pathway in human cells, suggesting new designs for future bioactive molecules.

Introduction

As nucleosides enter the cell from the outside, they are recognized and phosphorylated by enzymes that are involved in the cellular nucleotide salvage pathway. Initial monophosphorylation by nucleoside kinase enzymes (Scheme 1) is an important rate limiting step leading to their biological activity.1 The monophosphates are then further phosphorylated by the actions of a lower-selectivity nucleotide kinase followed by nucleotide diphosphate kinase, ultimately entering the nucleoside triphosphate pool from which DNA polymerases can select during replication and repair of the genome. There are two human cellular thymidine kinases: TK1 (the cytosolic kinase) and TK2 (the mitochondrial kinase). TK1 expression is upregulated in rapidly dividing cells, while TK2 is constitutively expressed in the mitochondria, where metabolism is always ongoing. The known substrate specificity of TK1 is restricted to thymidine and deoxyuridine, while that of TK2 also includes deoxycytidine. Although an x-ray crystal structure of human TK1 was published recently, thymidine triphosphate was bound as a feedback inhibitor rather than as a phosphoryl accepting substrate.2 No structure of TK2 is yet available. Thus details of possible differential nucleoside recognition mechanisms by these enzymes are lacking.

Scheme 1
Reaction catalyzed by thymidine kinase.

Understanding the specificity of kinases is important for several reasons. First, these enzymes help achieve correct steady-state concentrations and balances of nucleotides for DNA replication; thus the enzymes are central to proper cellular function. Second, numerous clinically important nucleoside drugs are recognized and phosphorylated by the nucleoside kinases.3 For example, AZT and stavudine (d4T) are important antiviral compounds used in treatment of AIDS, and telbivudine is a recently approved therapeutic agent for HBV infection.4 Similarly, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine is an agent long used to treat breast cancer.5 All of these compounds are activated by thymidine kinases.

In addition to therapeutics, isotopically labeled thymidine derivatives are increasingly important as imaging agents; for example, 3’-18F-dT is now under wide study as a PET imaging agent,6 and 123I-deoxyuridine is being investigated as a gamma-emitting tumor imaging agent.7 These are also dependent on thymidine kinase for their activities. A better understanding of how such compounds are recognized by TK1 and TK2 can give basic insight into their useful biological activities, and may lead to new ideas for future bioactive nucleoside design.

With these goals in mind, here we use nonpolar nucleoside mimics to study the influences of nucleobase electrostatics and sterics on nucleobase recognition by human thymidine kinases. In human thymidine kinases, a range of nucleoside analogs has been previously studied in vitro,1,8 although the large majority of these analogs involve modifications to the sugar, and only a small number contain modifications to the base.8

Few studies have been carried out to systematically probe the hydrogen bonding face of thymidine, despite the fact that it is this surface that is commonly believed to give thymidine its biochemical identity. Here we show that one human TK can accept nonpolar nucleosides with high efficiency, and that the two human thymidine kinases differ markedly from one another in their recognition mechanisms. Exploiting this mechanism of recognition could have important implications in future drug design, since the two kinases have distinct biological roles.1 In addition, the results have bearing on the future use of unnatural nucleobases in synthetic genetic systems.9

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-f0002.jpg

Experimental Section

Synthesis of nucleoside analogs

The synthesis of nucleoside analogs 1−5 was carried out as described previously.10 Fluorinated analogs 6, 7, 8, and 9 were prepared according to Scheme 2 (details below).

Scheme 2
Synthetic scheme for preparation of nucleoside analogs 6−9

5-Bromo-3,4- difluorobenzaldehyde (8b) and 5-Bromo-2,3-difluorobenzaldehyde (9b)

3,4-difluorobenzaldehyde (8a) 7.00 g, 49.23 mmol) was dissolved in concentrated H2SO4 (22.3 mL) and heated to 60° C. To this was added N-bromosuccinimide (10.55 g, 59.10 mmol) in three portions over a period of 30 minutes. After heating for ~ 3 hours under N2, the reaction mixture was poured into ice water. The product was extracted with hexanes, washed with water and brine, then dried over Na2SO4.11 Purification by silica gel column chromatography (0−10% EtOAc in hexanes) yielded an orange liquid as product 8b in 50% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 10.23 (d, 1H, JHF=2.5168), 7.77 (dd, 1H, JHF=9.2 Hz), 7.51 (dd, 1H, JHF = 7.5 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −124.89 (JFF= 15.2 Hz), −135.98 (JFF=11.3 Hz)

13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 189.45 (JCF= 9.8 Hz), 155.00 (JCF= 17. 7 Hz), 152.92 (JCF= 12.7 Hz), 151.30 (JCF= 10.2 Hz), 149.30 (JCF= 8.9 Hz).

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 219.9335 for [C7H3BrF2O], found 219.9321 for [M]+

The same procedure was done with 2,3-difluorobenzaldehyde (9a) to prepare 9b in 45% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 10.29 (s, 1H), 7.77 (m, 1H), 7.59 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ −148.51, (m, JFF= 15.4), −133.71 (m, JFF = 15.4); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 184.55, 152.96, 151.69, 150.93, 149.62, 126.31.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 219.9335 for [C7H3BrF2O], found 219.9327 for [M]+

5-Bromo-3,4- difluorobenzylalcohol (8c) and 5-Bromo-2,3-difluorobenzyl alcohol (9c)

8b (3.00 g, 13.57 mmol) was dissolved in 215 mL ethanol, to which was added 1.30 g (39.60 mmol) of ammonium carbonate followed by 0.51 g (15.53 mmol) of sodium borohydride. Reaction monitored by TLC was complete after ~30 min stirring.12 The reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and the filtrate was concentrated to give the white solid 8c in 80% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 7.37 (m, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −137.79 (JFF=20.5 Hz), −138.60 (JFF=20.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 126.38 (JCF=5.0 Hz), 121.51, 121.38, 117.27, 117.00, 115.53, 115.40.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 221.9492 for [C7H5BrF2O], found 221.9423 for [M]+

The same procedure was done with 9b to give 9c in 73% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.36 (m, 1H, JHH=0.9 Hz), 7.25 (m, 1H, JHF= 2.9 Hz), 4.73 (d, 2H, JHF= 6.5 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −135.77 (JFF= 19.5, 10.6 Hz), −146.05 (JFF=19.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 151.12, 149.12, 148.31, 146.35, 131.88, 126.42, 119.69.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 221.9492 for [C7H5BrF2O], found 221.9478 for [M]+

5-bromo-3,4-difluoro-5-(iodomethyl)benzene (8d) and 5-bromo-2,3-difluoro-5-(iodomethyl)benzene (9d)

Cesium iodide (6.55 g, 25.23 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL anhydrous acetonitrile, to which was added 8c (1.86 g, 8.41 mmol) dissolved in 5 mL anhydrous acetonitrile and AlCl3 (3.36 g, 25.2 mmol) dissolved in 5 mL anhydrous acetonitrile. The orangish-yellow solution was allowed to stir 24 h and was then quenched with ice water and extracted with hexanes.13 The organic layer was washed with water, brine, and dried over Na2SO4 to give 6.68 grams of yellow product in 87% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.39 (t, 1H, JHF=9.5 Hz), 7.30 (t, 1H, JHF=8.5 Hz), 4.42 (s, 2H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −134.68, −137.17 ; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 150.61 (JCF=12.9 Hz), 148.62 (JCF=7.0 Hz), 135.35 (JCF=5.7 Hz), 122.43, 122.27, 118.85, 118.67.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 331.8509 for [C7H4BrF2I], found 331.8496 for [M]+

The same procedure was done with 9c to give 9c in 80% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.25 (m, 2H, JHF=10.3 Hz), 4.35 (s, 2H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −134.28, −142.23; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 151.99, 139.24, 128.57, 120.77, 120.64, 115.55, 55.15

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 331.8509 for [C7H4BrF2I], found 331.8502 for [M]+

5-bromo-3,4-difluorotoluene (8e) 5-bromo-2,3-difluorotoluene (9e)

8d (1.67 g, 5.02 mmol) was dissolved in 100 mL THF to which was added 16.70 g of a slurry of aqueous Raney Nickel. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hour and filtered through a pad of Celite.14 The solvent was evaporated to yield the reduced compound 8e in 65% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 7.34 (t, 1H, JHF=8.6), 7.04 (t, 1H, JHF=10.0 Hz), 2.33 (s, 3H) 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −124.41 (dd, JFF=22.4 Hz, 9.6 Hz), −136.63 (dd, JFF=22.4 Hz, 11.4 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz, ppm) δ 150.69, 148.21, 134.82, 125.70, 121.26 (JCF=15.7 Hz), 118.99, 104.98.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 205.9543 for [C7H5BrF2], found 205.9536 for [M]+

The same procedure was done with 9d to give 9e in 46% yield:

1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 7.14 (t, 1H, JHF=8.0), 7.09 (t, 1H, JHF=7.1), 2.28 (d, 3H, JHF=2.4); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −136.23 (dd, JFF=20.1 Hz, 9.0 Hz), −143.95 (d, JFF=20.1 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 151.95, 149.97, 149.45, 149.29, 147.57, 147.44, 30.55.

HRMS (EI+) calcd mass 205.9543 for [C7H5BrF2], found 205.9535 for [M]+

General procedure for C-nucleoside couplings

A previously described method of C-nucleoside coupling15 was used to yield new fluorinated aromatic nucleosides 6b, 7b, 8f, and 9f as the tetraisopropyl disiloxane intermediate. The synthesis involves the reaction of aryllithium derivates of the fluorinated aromatic compounds with 3’,5’-O-((1,1,3,3-tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-2’deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone in pentane at −78°C to give a hemiketal which is then reduced to give a disiloxane intermediate. This intermediate was then deprotected using tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) to give the free nucleoside compounds 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Procedure for Lactone Coupling Reaction to Yield Protected Nucleoside Analogs

6a (0.250 g, 1.32 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous pentane (2 mL) and cooled to −78°C. t-Butyllithium (1.5M in pentane, 1 eq.) was added slowly to the mixture and stirred for 30 minutes under Ar. 3’,5’-O-((1,1,3,3-tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-2’deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone dissolved in anhydrous THF (2 mL) was added slowly to the mixture and allowed to stir at −78°C for 3 hours. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl at −78°C and allowed to warm to room temperature. The solution was extracted with ether (2×10 mL) and washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl, water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated as a yellow oil.

The crude product was allowed to dry overnight and was then dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (4 mL) and cooled to −78°C under argon. Triethylsilane (3 eq.) and boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (3 eq.) were slowly added to the mixture and the reaction proceeded for 4 hours. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and allowed to warm to room temperature. The solution was extracted with ether and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, concentrated as a yellow oil, and purified by flash silica gel chromatography (5:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate) to yield 3’, 5’ –O- ((1,1,3,3-Tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(2-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (compound 6b) in 26% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.28 (m, 1H), 7.00 (m, 1H, JHF = 8.2 Hz), 6.88 (t, 1H, JHF = 9.3 Hz), 5.30 (t, 1H, JHF = 7.5 Hz, H-1’), 4.50 (dd, 1H, JHF = 13.4, 6.5 Hz, H-3’), 4.12 (dd, 1H, H-5’), 3.98−3.92 (m, 1H, H-5’), 3.87−3.83 (m, 1H, H-4’), 2.46−2.40 (m, 1H, H-2’α), 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.10−2.04 (m, 1H, H-2’β), 1.03 (m, 28H, 4x-CH(CH3)2); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −124.88 ; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 159.09, 157.12, 133.73, 129.34, 127.52, 115.07, 114.92, 85.93, 73.22, 72.56, 63.22, 42.00, 29.94, 21.02, 17.84, 17.50, 17.34, 17.26, 13.73, 13.60, 13.16, 12.79.

HRMS (EI+, Na+) calcd mass 491.2425 for [C24H40F2O4Si2+Na]+ found 491.2423 for [M+Na]+ 3’, 5’ –O- ((1,1,3,3-Tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(4-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (compound 7b) in 21% yield.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.15 (d, 1H, JHF = 7.9 Hz), 7.11 (m, 1H), 6.94 t, 1H, JHF = 8.9 Hz), 5.02 (t, 1H, JHF = 7.0 Hz, H-1’), 4.52 (m, 1H, H-3’), 4.12−4.09 (m, 1H, H-5’), 3.92−3.86 (m, 1H, H-5’), 2.36−2.30 (m, 1H, H-2’α), 2.26 (d, 3H, CH3, JHF = 2.0 Hz), 2.07−2.01 (m, 1H, H-2’β), 1.06 (m, 28H, 4x-CH(CH3)2); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −119.92; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 137.61, 129.16, 125.06, 115.11, 114.88, 89.89, 86.65, 78.80, 73.38, 63.78, 43.31, 29.98, 17.82, 17.70, 17.68, 17.48, 17.35, 14.79, 13.74, 13.63, 13.24, 12.74.

HRMS (EI+, Na+) calcd mass 491.2425 for [C24H40F2O4Si2+Na]+ found 491.2424 for [M+Na]+

3’, 5’ –O- ((1,1,3,3-Tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(2,3-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (compound 8f) in 20% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.38 (dd, 1H, JHF = 9.9 Hz), 6.94 (dd, 1H, JHF = 10.4 Hz), 5.17 (t, 1H, JHF = 6.0 Hz, H-1’), 4.51−4.47 (m, 1H, H-3’), 4.14 (dd, 1H, H-5’), 4.03−3.94 (m, 1H, H-5’), 3.87−3.84 (m, 1H, H-4’), 2.45−2.40 (m, 1H, H-2’α), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.2−2.06 (m, 1H, H-2’β), 1.12−1.02 (m, 28H, 4x-CH(CH3)2); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −141.87 (JFF= 12.2 Hz), −142.19 (JFF= 12.2 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 149.52, 148.46, 138.35, 130.51, 127.20, 125.83, 123.37, 112.25, 105.62, 86.47, 72.82, 63.41, 43.29, 17.80, 17.68, 17.47, 17.32, 17.19, 14.75, 14.37, 13.73, 13.64, 13.20, 12.75.

HRMS (EI+, Na+) calcd mass 509.2331 for [C24H40F2O4Si2+Na]+ found 509.2346 for [M+Na]+

3’, 5’ – O- ((1,1,3,3-Tetraisopropyl)disiloxanediyl)-1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(3,4-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (compound 9f from 9e) in 18% yield

1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.00 (m, 1H, JHF = 5.2 Hz), 6.90 (m, 1H, JHF = 7.2 Hz), 4.99 (t, 1H, JHF = 8.1 Hz), 4.49 (b, 1H, H-3’), 4.12 (m, 1H, H-5’), 4.09 (m, 1H, H-5’), 3.90−3.85 (m, 1H, H-4’), 2.37−2.31 (m, 1H, H-2’α), 2.28 (d, 3H, CH3, JHF = 2.1 Hz), 2.02−1.95 (m, 1H, H-2’β), 1.03 (m, 28H, 4x-CH(CH3)2); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −139.18 (JFF = 21.2, 10.3 Hz), −144.58 (JFF = 21.2 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 148.46, 138.34, 130.51, 127.20, 125.83, 123.37, 86.47, 72.82, 70.56, 63.41, 43.29, 17.8, 17.47, 17.32, 14.75, 13.73, 13.20, 12.75 .

HRMS (EI+, NH3) calcd mass 504.2777 for [C24H40F2O4Si2+NH4]+ found 504.2775 for [M+NH4]+

Procedure for Deprotection of Nucleoside Analogs

6b (0.06 g, 0.12 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF (3 mL). Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.0 M, THF, 0.36 mL) was added dropwise and the solution was allowed to stir for 2 hours at room temperature. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with 5% potassium bicarbonate (1 mL) and extracted twice with ether. The organic layer was washed with 5% potassium bicarbonate, water and brine and then concentrated to give a yellow oil. Silica gel chromatography (0−10% CH3OH in CH2Cl2) gave a white, crystalline solid, 1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(2-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (6) from 6b in 67% yield: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.21 (d, 1H, JHF = 7.5 Hz), 7.04 (m, 1H), 6.92 (dd, 1H, JHF = 9.8 Hz), 5.34 (dd, 1H, JHF = 16.5, 5.5 Hz), 4.48 (br, 1H), 4.04−4.01 (m, 1H), 3.89−3.75 (m, 2H), 2.33−2.29 (m, 1H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.12−2.04 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −123.88; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 129.71, 127.87, 124.60, 115.80, 107.72, 87.29, 74.04, 63.56, 40.56, 29.96, 24.02, 21.03.

HRMS (EI+, NH3) calcd mass 244.1349 for [C12H15FO3+NH4+] found 244.1347 for [M+NH4]+

1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(4-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (7) from 7b in 70% yield, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.16 (d, 1H, JHF = 8.5 Hz), 7.12 (m, 1H, JHF = 7.5 Hz), 6.97 (t, 1H, JHF = 6.5 Hz), 5.11 (dd, 1H, JHF = 9.8, 6.5 Hz), 4.45 (m, 1H), 4.02−3.99 (m, 1H), 3.87−3.83 (m, 1H), 3.78−3.73 (m, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H, JHF = 2.0 Hz), 2.26−2.21 (m, 1H), 2.07−1.98 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −119.33 Hz; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 129.44, 125.27, 115.20 (JCF=23.7 Hz), 87.47, 79.88, 74.04, 63.63, 59.29, 44.34, 29.92, 24.36, 20.02.

HRMS (EI+, NH3) calcd mass 244.1349 for [C12H15FO3+NH4+] found 244.1348 for [M+NH4]+

1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(2,3-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (8) from 8f in 67% yield, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.26 (1H), 6.94 (dd, 1H, JHF = 8.8 Hz), 5.25 (dd, 1H, JHF = 15.1, 4.8 Hz), 4.47 (br, 1H), 4.00 (m, 1H), 3.86−3.82 (m, 2H), 2.28−2.21 (m, 1H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.89−1.81 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −141.11, −144.53; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 138.72, 136.54, 128. 07, 118.36, 114.05, 104.53, 86.94, 63.25, 55.91, 42.93, 29.79, 18.56.

HRMS (EI+, NH3) calcd mass 262.1255 for [C12H14F2O3+NH4+] found 262.1253 for [M+NH4]+

1’-2’-dideoxy-β-1’-(3,4-fluoro-5-methylphenyl)-D-ribofuranose (9) from 9f in 60% yield, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 6.98 (dd, 1H, JHF = 10.7, 7.7 Hz), 6.90 (d, 1H, JHF = 6.3 Hz), 5.07 (m, 1H, JHF = 9.8, 5.8 Hz), 4.43 (m, 1H), 4.02−3.99 (m, 1H), 3.85−3.73 (m, 2H), 2.38−2.33 (m, 1H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 1.99.1.93 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm) δ −138.36 (JFF=11.6 Hz), −143.97 (JFF=21.4 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 137.09, 127.32, 123.60, 112.28, 111.28, 84.50, 79.10, 73.67, 63.37, 44.29, 29.79, 19.8.

HRMS (EI+, NH3) calcd mass 262.1255 for [C12H14F2O3+NH4+] found 262.1254 for [M+NH4]+

Methods for preparation of kinases TK1 and TK2

Recombinant human TK1 and TK2 were expressed and purified using a bacterial vector system E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS.16,17 This vector allows efficient purification of target proteins with an affinity tag of six histidines giving a rapid and complete purification in one step. The vector also contains a thrombin cleavage site fused to the N-terminus of the coding sequence. The His-tag could be effectively removed using Thrombin (Pharmacia Biotech). Addition of 10 mM DTT and 20% glycerol to samples were done directly after elution. The purity of the enzymes and the extent of digestion with Thrombin were determined using SDS-PAGE.

Kinetics Methods

The adenosine 5’-triphosphate transfer assay was performed with 0.05 μM [γ32-P]-ATP (10 μCi/μL), 100 μM ATP, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 mg/mL BSA, 10 mM DTT and different concentrations of nucleoside analogs. The reaction was initiated by adding enzyme followed by incubation at 37°C and terminated by boiling after 20 minutes. Two μL of the supernatant was applied to PEI cellulose FTLC plates. Chromatography was performed for 8−12 hours with isobutyric acid: NH4OH: H2O (66:1:33) (v/v) as the mobile phase. The products of the kinase reaction were detected by autoradiography or phospho-imager analysis. The spots were excised and eluted with 0.5 mL of 0.2 mL KCl/ 01 M HCl (1:1, v/v) and quantified by liquid scintillation counting or by phosphorimager (Fuji BAS 25000/LAS 1000, FUJIFILM, 1 &1-Imaging & Information) with Image Reader V 1.7E. The apparent Km and Vmax values were determined using the Michaelis-Menten equation and nonlinear regression analysis with SigmaPlot 2001 program (Enzyme Kinetics from SPSS Science). Kinetics values were obtained using a single enzyme preparation, and were repeated at least twice with similar values.

Results

First we investigated the effects of nucleobase electrostatics on TK1 and TK2 substrate recognition by comparing the natural substrate thymidine with the isosteric difluorotoluene deoxynucleoside (Fig. 1).18

Figure 1
Comparison of structures and electrostatics for thymidine (T) and low-polarity nucleoside isostere 1. Bond lengths (Å) and calculated atomic charges are taken from reference 18a.

The latter has nearly identical size and shape as the natural compound, but with considerably lower local atomic charge densities, and a greatly attenuated ability to undergo hydrogen bonding.18a,e We evaluated phosphorylation of the nucleosides in vitro (using purified kinases) by use of γ-32P-ATP and thin layer chromatographic (TLC) analysis of products, with quantitation by autoradiography. Table 1 shows data from one time point at varied nucleoside concentrations. The results showed (see first and second entries in the Table) that TK1 phosphorylated the nonpolar isostere 1 at 3.8% of the yield of the natural compound (at 100 μM substrate, 20 min), which suggests a substantial dependence of this enzyme on electrostatics of the nucleobase. In contrast to this, TK2 phosphorylated the analog 1 at nearly as high a yield as the natural compound (in agreement with a preliminary study that included 1)8c, indicating that this mitochondrial enzyme requires little electrostatic charge or hydrogen bonding ability to efficiently recognize and phosphorylate a substrate.

Table 1
Yields for 5'-phosphorylation of nucleoside analogs by human thymidine kinases 1 and 2 (TK1 and TK2).a

A polar substrate such as thymidine might be recognized by enzymes either by use of complementary electrostatics, or by providing a sterically complementary active site pocket, or both. To probe steric selectivity of the two kinases, we employed a series of nonpolar thymidine mimics with systematically varied size.19 In these nucleoside analogs, the projecting groups at the 2 and 4 positions (which are carbonyl groups in thymine) are varied by substituting toluene with H, F, Cl, Br, and I substituents (Fig. 2). Thus the range of compounds varies by 1 Å in size across the series. In electrostatic terms, the new compounds (25) are even less polar than the difluoro compound (1), which is measurably quite hydrophobic as a result of its hydrofluorocarbon aromatic “nucleobase” ring. Thus electrostatic effects across the series are expected to be quite small.

Figure 2
Variably-sized thymidine mimics as substrates for human thymidine kinases. (A) Analog sizes as measured by C-X bond length (R=2-deoxyribose). (B) Phosphorylation activities with TK1 and TK2 as a function of analog size; data are taken from Table S1, 200 ...

The results of phosphorylation with these variably-sized compounds are presented graphically in Figure 2B, and yields are tabulated in Supporting Table S1. The data establish that both TK1 and TK2 show substantial steric preferences for the difluoro analog, which is the analog closest in size to natural thymidine. Both smaller (H) and larger substituents (Cl,Br,I) lead to lower phosphorylation yields. This size preference may be attributed to both enzymes having relatively rigid active sites that best accommodate the size of the natural substrate.

The above data showed that while TK1 is sensitive to electrostatics, TK2 is not, thus allowing it to accept a nonpolar nucleobase analog readily. Our data show that both enzymes have a distinct size preference for a difluoro-substituted benzene relative to smaller or larger variants. However, since all analogs have substituents at the 2,4 positions, the above data did not address whether the active site is most sensitive simply to the size/volume of the nucleobase, or rather its shape20 (i.e., the steric projections in specific locations) during substrate recognition. To test this explicitly for TK2, which accepts nonpolar analogs readily, we prepared a third set of nonpolar nucleoside analogs (69) as possible substrates. In the first two of these (6,7) there is a single fluorine substituent at the 2 or 4 position to test individually the importance of the two steric projections associated with the natural substrate.

The remaining two compounds (8,9) are the same size as the high-activity substrate 1, but with the 2- or 4-substituent moved to the 3-position. These latter two test variations in shape without substantially altering size or electrostatic charge on the substituents. Details of the synthetic preparation and characterization of these compounds are given in the Experimental section. The data for phosphorylation yields with these substrates are shown in Table 1; as expected, they were not measurably substrates for TK1, but were accepted with varying efficiency by TK2.

The experimental results for these analogs with TK2 show that a single substituent at the 2 or 4 position is beneficial to activity, and that the 4-substituent is more important for activity than the 2-substituent. Indeed, the 4-fluorotoluene analog 7 is a relatively efficient substrate for this enzyme, although not as good as compound 1, which has both of these substitutions. Importantly, compounds 8 and 9, which have shapes altered from the original 1, are relatively poor substrates. Thus we conclude that the human TK2 enzyme clearly prefers benzene (pyrimidine-like) substrates in which there is a steric projection at both the 2- and 4-positions, and in which there is no projection (even a small fluorine) at the 3-position, which, of course, is the steric definition of thymine itself. What is surprising is how sensitive the enzyme is to small steric changes: altering a hydrogen substituent to fluorine results in only a ~0.25 Å increase in steric size, yet the enzyme clearly senses this difference at all three positions on the hydrogen bonding edge of the pyrimidine.

To gather more information on the effects of sterics in recognition by TK2, we carried out more in-depth studies of nucleoside phosphorylation at varied nucleotide concentration for the series 1,6,7,8,9, and fit the data to obtain apparent Michaelis-Menten parameters (see Figure 3 and Experimental section). The results are shown in Table 2, and detailed data are given in Table S1. Limited solubility of some of the nonpolar substrates prevented us from using high enough concentrations to achieve true saturation for most of the analogs except 1, thus increasing uncertainty in the kinetic parameters. Given that limitation, the data for 1,7,8,9 show that in general, the differences between the substrates are in most cases reflected in altered Km values rather than in changes in Vmax. The better substrates (e.g., 1,7) show apparent Vmax values close to or higher than natural thymidine; however, apparent Km values are less favorable by a factor of 3 to 27.

Figure 3
Concentration curves for phosphorylation of 2,4-diF An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-ig0007.jpg, 4-F An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-ig0008.jpg, 2-F An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-ig0009.jpg, 2,3-diF An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-ig0010.jpg and 3,4-diF An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-106304-ig0011.jpg analogs by TK2, using 0.05 μM [γ32-P]-ATP (10 μCi/ μL), 100 μM ATP, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 mg/mL ...
Table 2
Apparent Michaelis-Menten kinetics parameters for 5'-phosphorylation of nucleoside analogs by human thymidine kinase 2 (hTK2).

Interestingly, the altered-shape analogs 8,9 do show a lowered apparent Vmax value, suggesting that substitution at the 3-position may result in some misalignment in the active site, hindering the reaching of a rate-limiting competent complex. Remarkably, the two best analogs are quite efficient substrates, with the 4-fluoro analog 7 showing apparent efficiency (Vmax/Km) within 14-fold of the natural substrate, and the 2,4-difluoro analog 1 within 2.5-fold of natural thymidine.

Discussion

The current experiments establish clearly that the two human thymidine kinases recognize their substrates by very different chemical criteria. Examination of the nucleoside binding site of human TK12 (with analogy to the related U. urealyticum enzyme structure21) suggests that polar protein backbone groups form hydrogen bonds to all three polar groups (the two carbonyls and imino proton) of thymine (see SI Figs. S1-S3). The substrate nucleobase is well buried, with no access to solvent. The current results with TK1 suggest that loss of these hydrogen bonds with concomitant desolvation of these sidechain groups is costly, making nonpolar structures poor substrates. Interestingly, combined analysis of the sequence of TK2 along with the homologous dNK structure22 suggests that TK2 also makes hydrogen bonds to the base, in this case from a glutamine to the O4 and NH groups of thymine. However, the base binding pocket of this latter enzyme appears to be more solvent accessible than that of TK1, and direct solvent access near O2 appears possible in TK2 (see Figs. S1-S3). Thus for TK2 it seems reasonable that a nonpolar substrate can occupy the active site without invoking full desolvation costs. Moreover, greater solvent accessibility would be expected to lower the energetic contribution of H-bonds by presenting a higher local dielectric.

A previous study of the phosphorylation of unnatural nucleosides (primarily with modified indole nucleobases) by a fruit fly kinase, Dm-dNK, demonstrated the flexibility of that enzyme's active site and the small influence of electronic effects.23 However, that study also concluded that hydrogen bonding is necessary for effective enzymatic activity. This is in contrast to the current results with human TK2, which show that hydrogen bonding is not essential for effective phosphorylation. This difference is somewhat surprising, given the homology of dNK with TK2, but it is possible that small sequence differences are the cause, or that steric constraints in Dm-dNK were too restrictive for the analogs tested.

The current results have potentially useful implications for future nucleoside design. For example, there is the possibility of selectively targeting one of the two classes of thymidine kinases over the other.24 Knowing the mechanisms of TK1 and TK2 substrate selectivity might enable design of antiviral therapeutics, where mitochondrial toxicity resulting from unintended phosphorylation by TK2 and subsequent incorporation of the analog nucleotide into mitochondrial DNA can be avoided. In addition, ways to prevent inhibition of TK2 phosphorylation of the natural mitochondrial thymidine substrate by the presence of a competing antiviral analog is desirable, since such a mechanism of mitochondrial toxicity has been demonstrated in case of AZT.25

Interestingly, some related difluorobenzene nucleoside analogs have been shown to be relatively nontoxic in human cell lines.26 The current data suggests that they may well have been phosphorylated by kinases in these cells. Their fate after this potential phosphorylation remains unknown, but the possibility of their activity in additional cellular nucleotide-processing pathways is intriguing and merits further study.

The current data also have implications in design of bases and base pairs for augmenting the natural genetic system. Future nucleobase designs, if meant to function in the nucleotide salvage pathway, will need to address what types of cells are to be the host, and to determine whether TK1 or TK2 will be the intended target. Polar designs may be best suited to TK1 in rapidly dividing cells, and nonpolar designs should be targeted to TK2. Alternatively, one may need to engineer kinases with new selectivities.27 The current data suggest some molecular strategies that may alter this selectivity, and the current nucleoside analogs may be useful as probes of new enzymes that use thymidine as substrate.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by NIH grant GM072705 and by grants to SE from the Swedish Research Council.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Data for kinetics analysis of kinases; NMR spectra of nucleoside analogs; active site models.

References

1. Al-Madhoun AS, Tjarks W, Eriksson S. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2004;4:341–50. [PubMed]
2. Welin M, Kosinska U, Mikkelsen NE, Carnrot C, Zhu C, Wang L, Eriksson S, Munch-Petersen B, Eklund H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:17970–17975. [PubMed]
3. Van Rompay AR, Johansson M, Karlsson A. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003;100:119–39. [PubMed]
4. Qi X, Xiong S, Yang H, Miller M, Delaney WE., 4th Antivir. Ther. 2007;12:355–62. [PubMed]
5. van Laar JA, Rustum YM, Ackland SP, van Groeningen CJ, Peters GJ. Eur. J. Cancer. 1998;34:296–306. [PubMed]
6. Herrmann K, Wieder HA, Buck AK, Schoffel M, Krause BJ, Fend F, Schuster T, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Wester HJ, Duyster J, Peschel C, Schwaiger M, Dechow T. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:3552–8. [PubMed]
7. Toyohara J, Hayashi A, Sato M, Gogami A, Tanaka H, Haraguchi K, Yoshimura Y, Kumamoto H, Yonekura Y, Fujibayashi Y. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003;30:687–96. [PubMed]
8. a. Hakimelahi GH, Ly TW, Moosavi-Movahedi AA, Jain ML, Zakerinia M, Davari H, Mei HC, Sambaiah T, Moshfegh AA, Hakimelahi S. J. Med. Chem. 2001;44:3710–20. [PubMed] b. Katona C, Timar F, Jeney A, Fischel JL, Milano G, Pandi E, Kralovanszky J. Anticancer Drugs. 1999;10:561–7. [PubMed] c. Al-Madhoun AS, Eriksson S, Wang ZX, Naimi E, Knaus EE, Wiebe LI. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucl. Acids. 2004;23:1865–1874. [PubMed]
9. a. Sismour AM, Benner SA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5640–5646. [PubMed] b. Henry AA, Romesberg FE. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003;7:727–733. [PubMed] c. Hirao I. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006;10:622–627. [PubMed] d. Krueger A, Lu H, Lee AH-F, Kool ET. Accts. Chem. Rev. 2007;40:141–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Rajesh K, Somasundaram M, Saiganesh R, Balasubramanian KK. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:5867–5869. [PubMed]
12. Mohanazadeh F, Hosini M, Tajbakhsh M. Monatsh. Chem. 2005;136:2041–2043.
13. Khan KM, Zia-Ullah S, Perveen S, Maharvi GM, Shah STA, Ambreen N, Choudhary MI, Atta-ur-Rahman, Voelter W. Lett. Org. Chem. 2005;2:644–647.
14. Barrero AF, Alvarez-Manzaneda EJ, Chahboun R, Meneses R, Romera JL. Synlett. 2001;4:485–488.
15. Wichai U, Woski SA. Org. Lett. 1999;1:1173–1175. [PubMed]
16. Usova EV, Eriksson S. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997;248:762–766. [PubMed]
17. Chottiner EG, Shewach DS, Datta NS, Ashcraft E, Gribbin D, Ginsburg D, Fox IH, Mitchell BS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:1531–1535. [PubMed]
18. a. Kool ET, Morales JC, Guckian KM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:990–1009. [PubMed] b. Kool ET, Sintim HO. Chem. Commun. 2006:3665–3675. [PubMed] c. Schweitzer BA, Kool ET. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:7238–7242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] d. Guckian KM, Kool ET. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998;36:2825–2828. [PMC free article] [PubMed] e. Wang X, Houk KN. Chem. Commun. 1998:2631–2632.
19. Kim TW, Delaney JC, Essigmann JM, Kool ET. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15803–15808. [PubMed]
20. Sintim HO, Kool ET. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:1974–1979. [PubMed]
21. Kosinska U, Carnrot C, Eriksson S, Wang L, Eklund H. FEBS J. 2005;272:6365–6372. [PubMed]
22. Johansson K, Ramaswamy S, Ljungcrantz C, Knecht W, Piskur J, Munch-Petersen B, Eriksson S, Eklund H. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001;8:616–620. [PubMed]
23. Wu Y, Fa M, Tae EL, Schultz PG, Romesberg FE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:14626–14630. [PubMed]
24. Hannigan BM, Barnett YA, Armstrong DB, McKelvey-Martin VJ, McKenna PG. Cancer Biother. 1993;8:189–97. [PubMed]
25. Lynx MD, McKee EE. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006;72:239–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Wang ZX, Duan W, Wiebe LI, Balzarini J, De Clercq E, Knaus EE. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucl. Acids. 2001;20:41–58. [PubMed]
27. Gerth ML, Lutz S. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;370:742–751. [PMC free article] [PubMed]