|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) is an enzyme that first hydrolyzes the sn-2 position of phospholipids, preferentially a diacylphosphocholine, and then transfers the fatty acid to cholesterol to yield a cholesteryl ester. HDL ApoA-I is the principal catalytic activator for LCAT. Activity of LCAT on nascent or lipid-poor HDL particles composed of phospholipid, cholesterol and ApoA-I allows the maturation of HDL particles into lipid-rich spherical particles that contain a core of cholesteryl ester surrounded by phospholipid and ApoA-I on the surface. This article reviews the recent progress in elucidating structural aspects of the interaction between LCAT and ApoA-I. In the last decade, there has been considerable progress in understanding the structure of ApoA-I and the central helices 5, 6, and 7 that are known to activate LCAT. However, much less information has been forthcoming describing the 3D structure and conformation of LCAT required to catalyze two separate reactions within a single monomeric peptide.
It has been almost 8 years since reviews covering the activation of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), EC 220.127.116.11, also called phosphatidylcholine-sterol acyltransferase, by HDL ApoA-I were published [1,2]. While reviews covering HDL ApoA-I structure continue to be published yearly [3–7], studies covering LCAT activation via HDL ApoA-I helices 5, 6 and 7 have only recently gained the attention of a number of investigators. Therefore, our emphasis will be to review the recent advances in both LCAT structure and its interaction with the central helices of ApoA-I.
Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase synthesizes HDL cholesteryl esters by transferring a phospholipid-derived fatty acid to cholesterol when bound to ApoA-I . Unique among enzymes, LCAT is responsible for catalyzing two distinct steps in the formation of plasma-derived cholesteryl esters. First, LCAT hydrolyzes an sn-2 fatty acid from phosphatidylcholine to form an acyl enzyme intermediate, while in the second step the fatty acid is transferred to cholesterol to form a cholesteryl ester. Functionally, LCAT is the major source of plasma-derived cholesteryl esters and is responsible for transforming nascent or lipid-poor HDL into spherical HDL containing a core of cholesteryl ester with an exterior composed of ApoA-I and phospholipid. The second step of the reaction has been shown to be reversible and may play a role in regulating cholesterol ester production , while sphingomyleins are known to inhibit the overall process [10–12]. ApoA-I, the principal protein component of HDL, is a potent activator of LCAT, and if not present little to no spherical HDL is formed [1,13]. Therefore, LCAT and ApoA-I appear to be essential for maintaining whole-body cholesterol homeostasis and essential components of reverse cholesterol transport, a process that is critical for removing cholesterol from the body .
The LCAT enzyme is a 416 amino acid protein with a molecular mass of approximately 47 kDa. LCAT undergoes post-translational glycosylation adding four N-linked and two O-linked complex glycans [15,16], giving a final molecular weight of approximately 58 kDa . The specific role of the glycan chains has not been identified, but they are known to be important for LCAT activity . Several mutagenesis studies have either reported inhibition, no effect or enhancement of LCAT reactivity, compared with wild-type LCAT, after replacing Asn residues within LCAT with amino acids that are not recognized for glycosylation [19–22]. Mutants without Asn residues at position 84 or 384 were unstable and lost catalytic activity , suggesting that glycosylation was essential for conformational stability of LCAT.
Assuming that LCAT belongs to the α/β hydrolase fold family, Peelman et al. proposed a structure using threading methods that aligned the sequence of LCAT with solved 3D structures . The final structure, based on fitting half of the LCAT sequence, suggested that it has seven β-strands connected together with loops and four α-helices. Among other defined structural elements in LCAT are two sets of disulfide bridges between Cys50–Cys74 and Cys313–Cys356. The Cys50–Cys74 disulfide was reported to be essential for the binding of LCAT to lipoprotein surfaces  and appears to be located in the putative ‘lid’ region that may cover the active site . Peelman reported that deletion of amino acids at positions 56 to 68 gave a mutant LCAT that was not active with any substrate .
The first five N-terminal amino acids are highly conserved and Vickaryous et al. demonstrated that deletion mutations of these hydrophobic amino acids had a dramatic effect on LCAT activity . Their scheme involved preparing mutant LCAT molecules lacking the first amino acid, then the first two amino acids, and so on, until they had deleted the first five amino acids. Deletion of the first amino acid through the first five N-terminal amino acids caused an almost complete loss of ApoA-I cofactor-dependent LCAT-catalyzed phospholipase activity and cholesterol esterification, or α-LCAT activity. More extensive N-terminal deletion caused an almost complete loss of phospholipase activity. Mutants lacking the first N-terminal amino acid could still esterify LDL-C (β-LCAT activity), but all other deletions resulted in a significant loss in all cholesterol esterification α- and β-LCAT activity. N-terminal deletions of the first and the first and second N-terminal amino acids did not affect binding of LCAT to recombinant HDL (rHDL) , similar to reports for other LCAT mutants . The loss of esterification activity suggests that these deletions cause conformational change(s) that reduce or eliminate the access of the phospholipid substrate to the catalytic site , but not the affinity of LCAT for rHDL. Peelman et al. demonstrated that the N-terminal conserved basic residues, Arg80, Arg147 and Asp145, if altered, would reduce LCAT activity and suggested that the mutations prevented intra-molecular salt-bridge formation, which is essential for LCAT activity . Another substitution in this region, the mutant Thr123 to Ile was also reported to be inactive with HDL [29,30]. Murray et al. found that amino acids at positions 121 to 136 of LCAT were highly conserved among six different species and that LCAT activity is sensitive to mutations in this region . They explored this observation by measuring antibody binding to this region when LCAT was bound to a hydrophobic surface or to plasma HDL coated onto microtiter plates. They found that the amino acid region at position 121 to 136 is unavailable for binding a polyclonal antibody specific for this region  when LCAT is bound to lipid. Based on predictions that the amino acid region at position 154–171 of LCAT could form an amphiphthic α-helix, Peelman et al. demonstrated that the synthetic peptide had a strong affinity for phospholipids . Increasing the hydrophobicity increased lipid affinity, while increasing the hydrophilicity decreased lipid affinity. These results support their hypothesis that the 154–171 region participates in the interaction of LCAT with lipid surfaces.
Investigations of LCAT’s active site have revealed only one nucleophilic amino acid, Ser181 [33,34], involved in catalysis, through the systematic mutation of LCAT serines. Further analysis has suggested that the catalytic site is composed of a catalytic triad [35,36], containing Asp345, His377 and Ser181, respectively . However, the some-what poor homology with other serine lipases and esterases has hindered more detailed predictions of LCAT’s structure. Nevertheless, assuming that LCAT did belong to the α/β hydrolase fold family, Peelman et al. proposed a structure using threading methods that aligned the sequence of LCAT with solved 3D structures . These studies also identified Phe103 and Leu182 as putative oxyanion hole residues . Subsequent studies identified Trp61, believed to be part of the putative lid region, as essential for catalytic activity . Using the proposed model for LCAT, Vanloo et al. showed that three natural mutations, Asn131 to Asp, Thr123 to Ile, and Asn391 to Ser, are located within 12 Å of one another. Natural and engineered mutations at Thr123 substantially reduced LCAT activity with rHDL. Other mutations caused a moderate reduction in LCAT activities as an acyltransferase and a phospholipase or PLA2 . Replacement of either Tyr120 or Phe382 with Ala resulted in a substantial reduction of rHDL-dependent acyltransferase activity. The model depicted by Peelman suggests that these two residues at positions 120 and 382 may lie close to one another .
ApoA-I, a 28 kDa protein, is synthesized by the liver and small intestine and plays a key role in the formation, metabolism and catabolism of HDL . The plasma concentration of HDL is highly correlated with protection against the development of coronary artery disease, even in patients with very low LDL-C levels . Lipidation of ApoA-I by the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) is essential for the formation of plasma HDL particles [40–42]. Lipid-free or lipid-poor ApoA-I acquire small amounts of phospholipid and cholesterol from membrane-bound ABCA1, generating several classes of nascent HDL particles  carrying one or more molecules of ApoA-I [44–46].
Maturation of HDL requires a second lipidation step, the synthesis of HDL cholesteryl esters catalyzed by LCAT , which provides a hydrophobic core by transforming lipidated, ABCA1-derived HDLs into spherical lipid-rich HDLs. In humans, if either ABCA1 or LCAT are inactive, the plasma concentrations of HDL ApoA-I are low because lipid-poor HDL is rapidly removed from the circulation [13,48]. These two ApoA-I lipidation steps are crucial to the formation of mature plasma HDL and whole-body cholesterol homeostasis [49–51]. Based on molecular models, an illustration showing the activation of LCAT  is shown in Figure 1, both before its docking (Figure 1A), and after docking (Figure 1B), onto a 96 Å diameter rHDL particle . LCAT is shown in yellow. The rHDL is composed of 150 molecules of palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) and two molecules of ApoA-I. The conformation of LCAT depicted in Figure 1 was derived from a model containing amino acids at position 9 through position 420 of the mature protein . Figure 1B illustrates that after LCAT docks or binds to ApoA-I helix 6 (purple), the LCAT domain corresponding to amino acids at positions 121–136 (blue) are shielded and are no longer accessible, as suggested by Murray et al., owing to their interaction with the surface of the rHDL . LCAT belongs to the α/β hydrolase fold family and there is a ‘gate or lid’ that may be involved in controlling substrate specificity. For neutral lipases, Dolinsky et al. suggest that in an aqueous environment the lid covers the active site . When the enzyme contacts a hydrophobic surface, such as a lipid, the lid opens making the catalytic site accessible to the lipid substrate. X-ray crystal analysis of substrates bound to bacterial lipases, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase that is in the same α/β hydrolase fold family, show that this ‘gate’ must move aside for the enzyme to bind and then react with lipid . Jonas proposed a simple hypothetical model for the actions of LCAT on rHDL in which LCAT first interacts with the lipid bilayer and subsequently interacts with ApoA-I to activate its catalytic function . Consistent with Jonas’s hypothetical model, Figure 1 shows the lipid-binding region, indicated by the arrow, interacting with phospholipid while part of LCAT interacts with ApoA-I helix 6.
From the conformation of ApoA-I on discs and the estimated size of LCAT it would appear that as many as two LCAT molecules could bind at one time to rHDL, however, there is presently no experimental evidence supporting the simultaneous binding of two LCAT molecules. Because most kinetic studies are conducted under conditions where the LCAT concentration is much lower, approximately 105-fold lower, than the rHDL concentration, statistical considerations suggest that there is only a small probability that two molecules of LCAT to simultaneously reside on a single disc.
The primary structure of ApoA-I consists of 243 amino acids with secondary structural motifs that are similar to other apolipoproteins. Lipid-free ApoA-I has been shown to have at least two regions or domains, N-terminal (position 1–187) and C-terminal (position 188–243), and each is reported to have unique interactions with lipids and proteins. The solution structure of lipid-free ApoA-I has been described as ‘molten globular’ , a state where the α-helical regions usually remain intact but β-sheets and connecting regions are more disordered. In molten globular proteins the hydrophobic regions are believed to face inward, with the hydrophilic faces interacting with the aqueous environment. Recent studies have shown that the N-terminal domain appears to be more compact than originally thought . These findings, along with the well known propensity of lipid-free ApoA-I to oligomerize , has led to the suggestion that ApoA-I may possess a more well-ordered structure  than has been inferred from its description as a ‘molten globular’ structure.
The first 43 residues of the N-terminal region are believed to be relatively disordered, but residues at positions 8–33 have been identified as a G* amphipathic α-helical region . Amino acids at positions 44–243, comprising approximately 80% of the protein, are composed of a series of ten tandem amphipathic α-helical repeating units with considerable amino acid conservation. Eight repeats contain 22 amino acids, while repeats 3 and 9 are composed of 11 amino acids. Seven of the ten repeats are separated by the helix-breaking amino acid proline . These ‘breaks’ have been suggested to impart flexibility to the protein allowing it to ‘bend’ around the periphery of HDL particles [62,63]. Two crystal forms of ApoA-I have been studied by x-ray crystallography. The first report was for an ApoA-I mutant that lacked the first 43 amino acids  and crystallized in a saddle conformation. This report stimulated additional studies into the structure of ApoA-I carried by rHDL. A later report by Ajees et al. on native ApoA-I showed that full-length, lipid-free ApoA-I crystallized as a four-helix bundle, similar to what has been reported for ApoE [64–66].
The type A amphipathic α-helix , first described by Segrest in 1974 , is a unique feature of lipoproteins. Each helical repeat of ApoA-I has one face enriched in hydrophobic amino acids while the opposing face is enriched with negatively charged amino acids. To enhance lipid solubility, the hydrophobic face of each amphipathic helix interacts with the phospholipid acyl chains in HDL, while the negatively charged hydrophilic face of each helix supports solvation by the aqueous phase. The function of the highly conserved positively charged amino acids that lie between the ‘faces’ of the helices remains speculative. It has been suggested that these positively charged residues interact with the negatively charged oxygen of the phospholipid head group [68,69]; this is termed the snorkel hypothesis. Although NMR evidence from a model amphipathic peptide associated with dodecylphosphatidylcholine (DDPC) micelles does not support the hypothesis , an NMR study of ApoC-II associated with DDPC micelles was consistent with the snorkel hypothesis .
Studies employing a variety of techniques have suggested that the central region of ApoA-I is essential for binding and activation of LCAT [13,72–74]. Analysis of the amino acid conservation among species within ApoA-I helices 5, 6 and 7 (or residues at positions 121–142, 143–164 and 165–186, respectively) has identified a large number of highly conserved, charged amino acids in this region. It has been hypothesized that these residues function by either forming electrostatic interactions directly with LCAT or forming intrahelical salt bridges within the ApoA-I central domain that interact with LCAT [75,76]. In Figure 1A, a 96 Å diameter rHDL composed of 150 molecules of POPC and two molecules of ApoA-I (green, orange and purple) is shown . The ApoA-I region corresponding to position 140–170 is colored in orange, with helix 6 amino acids at positions 143–164 colored in purple, and all other ApoA-I amino acids are shown in green. Based on structural models of LCAT, amino acids at positions 9–420 of the pro-form of LCAT  are shown.
In support of these models, Maiorano et al. suggested that ApoA-I helices 5, 6 and 7 (amino acids at positions 130–174) were important for the activation of LCAT since they were more solvent exposed when compared with other helices within lipid-bound ApoA-I . Sorci-Thomas et al. demonstrated that removing either helix 6 or 7 (amino acids at position 143–164) [13,72,73], or by replacing helix 6 with helix 10 (amino acids at position 220–241) , or by inverting helix 6’s hydrophobic face , caused a reduction in LCAT binding to rHDL, as well as reducing the apparent Vmax of the reaction. Sviridov et al. also explored the role of ApoA-I helix 6, specifically amino acids position 140–150, on rHDL’s ability to activate LCAT . Their results suggested that amino acids at position 140–150 were essential for LCAT activation .
All of these models depend on determining the 3D conformation of lipid-bound ApoA-I. Several advances have occurred over the past 10 years as experimental methods have been refined and used to investigate the conformation of ApoA-I on lipidated particles, including: mass spectrometry [6,53,80–83], electron paramagnetic resonance , fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) [58,84–86], and NMR . New insights into how the conformation of ApoA-I adapts to increases in lipid content have come from molecular dynamics simulations [88–91]. There is considerable agreement among the various reports. For example, in all of the models the central region of lipid-bound ApoA-I assumes an antiparallel ‘double belt’ with a helix 5 to 5 registry, that is, the central amphipathic helices 5 on each ApoA-I strand are situated side-by-side on the edge of the particle. Both Wu et al.  and Martin et al.  suggest that the two ApoA-I monomers do not wrap completely around the edge of the lipid particle as a smooth belt and present evidence for additional protein structures that appear to be important for LCAT activation. The ‘solar flares’ model proposed by Wu et al. was derived from the protruding loops consisting of residues at position 159–178 (parts of helices 6 and 7) . This region displayed significantly reduced exchange in the presence of LCAT , suggesting that the presence of the enzyme binding to this site blocked exchange. Although the concept for these loops within helices 5, 6 and 7 (amino acids at position 130–174) was first suggested by Maiorano et al. , Martin et al.  refined the analysis using a series of ApoA-I variants with cysteines engineered into the loop region. They found a single loop region protruding from the rest of the rHDL, located between amino acids at position 133–146 (portions of helices 5 and 6) through the use of nitroxide spin probes and FRET analysis. The effect of changes in registry on LCAT activation have not been systematically studied, but cysteine substitution mutants of ApoA-I have the ability to ‘lock’ the relationship of the two strands in other than a 5 to 5 registry. Studies using rHDL made from natural mutations, such as ApoA-IMilano  and ApoA-IParis , and engineered mutants  have suggested that these mutant ApoA-Is are poorer substrates for LCAT than wild-type ApoA-I.
The principal differences among the proposed 3D models of lipid-bound ApoA-I are related to the conformation of the C- and N-terminal ends . Bhat et al. proposed a lipid-bound conformation for ApoA-I on 96 Å diameter POPC rHDL (75 POPC/ApoA-I) using chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry . In this study they discovered the generation of two crosslinked ApoA-I dimers with unique electrophoretic mobility. These two dimers corresponded to distinct intermolecular crosslinks that involve either terminus or the central region of the protein and this information helps identify the regions where crosslinking has occurred . Their studies suggested that the N- and C-terminal ends were folded back and interact with each other forming a ‘buckle’ [53,82]. Bhat et al. later demonstrated that 80 Å diameter POPC rHDL assumed a conformation similar to that proposed for 96 Å diameter rHDL, except that the N- and C-terminal ends appeared to be further folded onto the ‘belt’ . Later analyses have indicated that the ends on 96Å rHDL show some flexibility and that the N-terminal end can also fold back over the C-terminal end. Wu et al. employed hydrogen-deuterium exchange (H/DX) with mass spectrometry to study ApoA-I structure on approximately 104 Å POPC rHDL (100 POPC/ApoA-I) . Solvent accessibility of different regions was assessed across the entire sequence of ApoA-I. The H/DX data were combined with the ‘double belt’ model  as a starting point for computational modeling of ApoA-I structure. The ‘solar-flares’ model predicts that the N-termini of two ApoA-I molecules form a symmetric, globular domain with amino acids at position 14–18 of both ApoA-I’s interacting. This model contrasts with the ‘belt buckle’ model where the C- and N-terminal ends fold back onto the edge of the disc. Recently, molecular dynamics simulations were used to rigorously test the ‘solar flares’ model and found that the model was not stable with these simulations .
Other recent studies have shown that the diameter of rHDL particles plays a highly significant role in LCAT activation. Cavigiolio et al. demonstrated that the catalytic efficiency, Vmax/Km(Apparent), for LCAT increases in proportion to the rHDL particle diameter . The increase in catalytic efficiency was primarily due to decreases in the binding of LCAT to the rHDL or Km. However, the lowest apparent Km was associated with rHDL particles having the largest diameter, which contain three to four ApoA-I monomers per particle . Since composition, lipid packing and the number of ApoA-I molecules per particle vary as the rHDL size changes, the interplay of each of these variables on LCAT activation will likely be the subject of future studies.
The size of rHDL particles is an important determinant of LCAT activation and ApoA-I helices 7 and 8 have been shown to act as determinants of HDL subclass distribution . Human ApoA-I binds almost equally well to both HDL2, an approximately 102 Å diameter particle, and HDL3, an approximately 84 Å diameter particle. However, murine ApoA-I (unlike the human ApoA-I sequence that has proline punctuation between helical regions 7 and 8) shows greater affinity for HDL3 compared with HDL2 . Systematically replacing amino acids at positions 184–190 with a seven amino acid transition sequence from each of the seven proline-punctuated interhelical regions from human ApoA-I to give mutant ApoA-Is, provided evidence for fourfold difference in affinities for HDL2 compared with HDL3 that depended on which proline-punctuated sequence was used . These results suggest that the effect-specific ‘helix-breaking’ regions are important for determining the size of the particle, and thus its ability to activate LCAT.
Consistent with the LCAT-activation properties of amino acids at positions 140 to 150 within helix 6, Shao et al. reported that the oxidation of one of the three methionine residues in ApoA-I – Met148 – to a sulfoxide completely obliterates LCAT activity on both rHDL and HDL3 . These conclusions are supported by other reports showing that mild oxidation of ApoA-I severely retards both HDL remodeling , as well as its 3D structure . In addition, earlier work on the effects of methionine oxidation also suggests that this process produces serious structural changes in ApoA-I conformation, as determined by altered chromatographic mobility [102–104] or denaturation with guanidine hydrochloride . In 2005, Panzenbock et al. published a review of methionine sulfoxide formation in oxidized HDL and concluded that owing to the large structural and functional consequences associated with this modification, it could be used as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis in humans . Since that time, other investigators have shown that oxidation of ApoA-I’s methionines appear to be more frequent in the plasma from diabetic patients  and from the plasma of mice with hepatocellular carcinoma .
In addition to the formation of methionine sulfoxide, the modification of other ApoA-I residues has been systematically studied to determine their effects on ApoA-I function . ApoA-I lysine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine residues were all studied to determine their susceptibility to myeloperoxidase modification. From these studies it was determined that loss of ApoA-I function was mediated primarily through the alteration of tryptophan residues , while the modification of methionine residues Met86 and Met112 may actually play a protective role, as previously suggested by Garner et al. [106,110]. Recent studies with myoglobin have suggested that although both methionine and tryptophan are oxidized by hypochlorite/myeloperoxidase, methionine appears to be somewhat more susceptible to oxidation .
Structural studies of lipidated ApoA-I have emphasized the use of rHDL that can be prepared with homogenous size and composition. Borhani et al. suggested that ApoA-I floats on the lipid surface of spherical HDL  with the hydrophobic faces of each helix interacting with the fatty acid acyl chains [69,112]. The α-helix content, tryptophan fluorescence and antibody binding of ApoA-I on 93 Å diameter POPC spheres were reported to be similar to that of 96 Å POPC rHDL, suggesting that the secondary structure of ApoA-I was similar on both . Although spherical HDL particles made in vitro carried three to four molecules of ApoA-I, FRET analysis of cholesteryl ester-containing HDL spheres prepared from dye-labeled ApoA-I POPC rHDL particles showed that the labeled helical repeats were significantly farther apart than those on original rHDL . Similar findings have also been reported from studies employing chemical crosslinking . However, the assignment of specific distance relationships between the helices was not possible . Recently, HDL with a cholesteryl ester core has been the subject of theoretical computations using a model particle composed of two ApoA-Is, 56 POPC and 16 molecules of cholesteryl oleate. These analyses suggested a shape that resembles a prolate ellipsoid , not unlike that reported for smaller HDL particles ; moreover, they suggested that the cholesterol component of the cholesteryl oleate core was in contact with ApoA-I and that this contact may contribute to the stabilization of the particle.
Future studies on the physiologic roles of LCAT should cover several different topics. Our first suggestion is a more intense analysis of the interaction between LCAT and ApoA-I. There are three facets to these studies, the first of which is to refine the structure of ApoA-I by defining the conformation its N- and C-terminal ends and obtaining a detailed conformation of the central looped region. The second issue is to more specifically define where LCAT interacts with, and is activated by, ApoA-I. The last issue in this set, and likely the most difficult, is to determine the 3D structure of LCAT so that the overall relationship between LCAT, ApoA-I and the lipid surface can be defined. As these issues are resolved using well-defined rHDL prepared by cholate dialysis, they should be followed up by the analysis of these interactions using small HDL generated by ABCA1.
A final understanding of the 3D relationship between LCAT, ApoA-I and phospholipid will come when we know how ApoA-I interacts with phospholipid in rHDL and small HDL particles from ABCA1. As alluded to in the text there is good theoretical justification of a phospholipid–ApoA-I interaction, which is described by the snorkel hypothesis. The snorkel hypothesis elegantly explains how the protein and phospholipid could form more thermodynamically stable particles by the combination of hydrophobic binding between lipid acyl chains and hydrophobic faces of the amphipathic helices and ionic interactions between the charged phospholipid head group and charged amino acids. The hypothesis has been studied using NMR, but at this time there have been mixed results. Resolution might be achieved by obtaining an x-ray structure of phospholipid–ApoA-I particles or by further analysis using more sophisticated NMR techniques.
HDL has been shown to carry oxidized lipids and reverse cholesterol transport may be a principal pathway for removing oxidized lipids from circulation when LCAT remodels ABCA1-derived particles. Previous studies have demonstrated that the lipids of HDL and LDL are equally susceptible to in vitro oxidation . It will be important to determine how the transport of oxidized lipids does not promote the oxidation of HDL phospholipids.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
These studies were supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, NIH (HL-49373 and HL-64163 to Mary Sorci-Thomas) and an International HDL Pfizer Award to Michael J Thomas.
The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Mary G Sorci-Thomas, Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1016, USA, Tel.: +1 336 716 2147, Fax: +1 336 716 6279, Email: ude.cmbufw@samohtsm.
Shaila Bhat, Department of Pathology, Lipid Sciences Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA, Tel.: +1 336 716 6062, Fax: +1 336 716 6279, Email: ude.cmbufw@tahb.
Michael J Thomas, Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA, Tel.: +1 336 716 2313, Fax: +1 336 716 6279, Email: ude.cmbufw@samohtm..
Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
• of interest
•• of considerable interest