Recent study of F. tularensis has yielded surprisingly little advancement concerning the characterization and function of virulence-associated proteins. Although many virulence factors have been discovered, particularly within the FPI, several of these proteins have proven to be very difficult to study due to toxicity issues and low expression levels. This research represents the first examples of PdpA protein characterization and has investigated the virulence of a non-polar, markerless, in-frame, pdpA deletion mutant.
Immediately downstream of
pdpA lies the
pdpB gene, and the
pdpB ribosome-binding site overlaps the 3′ end of
pdpA. This tight translational coupling of
pdpA and
pdpB, and between most other adjacent FPI genes, is consistent with mRNA expression studies that indicate that FPI genes are controlled by the same global regulators, including MglA, SspA, PmrA and FevR, or by the same environmental cues, such as low iron concentration (
Brotcke et al., 2006;
Brotcke & Monack, 2008;
Charity et al., 2007;
Deng et al., 2006;
Lenco et al., 2007;
Mohapatra et al., 2007). Data presented in this work on the effect of MglA and iron concentration on expression of PdpA and other FPI-encoded proteins provide evidence that expression extends to the protein level. The MglB protein has been presumed to be involved in expression, and in this work we provided evidence supporting this idea, as PdpA, PdpB and IglB expression was virtually undetectable in an
mglB mutant background.
It is also apparent that the allelic replacement of
pdpA has polar effects on expression of the downstream gene
pdpB, as there is considerably less PdpB protein present in strain NZ9 (Δ
pdpA
:

:

Em
R). This polarity may account for the increased attenuation of NZ9 in chicken embryos compared to Δ
pdpA (data not shown).
One central biological question regarding the FPI-encoded proteins involves their possible role in secretion or as effector proteins that interact with host-cell components. Using macrophage-grown
F. novicida we found PdpA in the bacterial cytoplasm. Although macrophage-grown
F. novicida cells are more difficult to analyse than broth-grown cells, we reasoned that they would provide better evidence of the biologically relevant localization of PdpA than analysis of broth-grown
F. novicida. Localization of PdpA to the bacterial cytoplasm may lead one to believe that the protein is not a component of the T6SS, as most proteins involved in assembling a secretion apparatus are membrane associated. However, this is not always the case; T6SS proteins have been shown to localize to both membrane and cytoplasmic fractions (
Wu et al., 2008) so our results have to be interpreted carefully. As a soluble protein, PdpA may function as a chaperone component of the T6SS or may be a secreted effector protein. We believe that PdpA might be a secreted effector protein as it does not appear to play a role in secretion as defined by our recently described criteria (
Ludu et al., 2008a), yet its absence profoundly decreases virulence in both chicken embryos and adult mice. Also, the deduced PdpA amino acid sequence shows low-level similarities to fragments of multiple proteins involved in the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and such molecular mimicry has been observed in virulence effectors of other intracellular pathogens (
Angot et al., 2007). One of the motifs that we identified is a possible F-box motif in the N-terminal region of PdpA. In eukaryotic cells F-box-containing proteins are involved in protein–protein interactions, most commonly in proteins in the ubiquitin–ligase complex (
Kipreos & Pagano, 2000). Inspection of the Pfam tree of F-box proteins (PF00646;
http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/family?acc=PF00646) reveals several prokaryotic F-box-containing proteins, and F-box regions have been shown to be important in two bacterial plant pathogens (
Angot et al., 2006;
Tzfira et al., 2004). Attempts to express domains that showed similarity to those found in ubiquitin–ligase complexes have been unsuccessful due to apparent toxicity involved in expressing PdpA protein domains, particularly those located within the amino terminus of the protein. Also, the introduction of alanine substitutions into key residues of the putative F-box failed to affect virulence of the resultant
F. novicida mutants (data not shown). All efforts to detect PdpA in the host-cell cytoplasm have been unsuccessful. Although we believe PdpA is a secreted effector protein, the current tools and methodologies available have been unable to confirm this. Clearly, extensive analysis of PdpA will be required to surmise its function in virulence. The accompanying paper (Schmerck
et al., 2009) reports studies on the intracellular growth phenotype of the Δ
pdpA mutant and the effect of the mutation on the macrophage gene expression response to
F. novicida infection.