PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 21.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2889144
NIHMSID: NIHMS146033

Antiretroviral Therapy Exposure and Insulin Resistance in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggesting an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected individuals has heightened the need to understand the relation of HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy use, and non–HIV-related factors with insulin resistance (IR).

Methods

Prospective study of 1614 HIV-infected and 604 HIV-uninfected participants from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study between October 2000 and March 2007. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)–estimated IR at 11,019 semiannual visits.

Results

HIV-infected women reporting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had higher median HOMA than HIV-uninfected women {1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11 to 1.30] times higher for those reporting protease inhibitor–containing HAART; 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.20) times higher for those reporting non–protease inhibitor–containing HAART}. Among HIV-infected, cumulative exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) of >3 years was associated with HOMA 1.13 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.25) times higher than the HOMA without any cumulative NRTI exposure. Cumulative exposure to the NRTI stavudine of >1 year was associated with HOMA 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.27) times higher than the HOMA without any cumulative stavudine use. Family history of diabetes, hepatitis C virus seropositivity, higher body mass index, or reporting menopause was associated with higher HOMA.

Conclusions

Longer cumulative exposure to NRTI; in particular, stavudine is associated with greater IR in HIV-infected women.

Keywords: antiretroviral therapy, HIV, HOMA, insulin resistance, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Insulin resistance (IR) has been increasingly recognized in HIV-infected individuals since the introduction of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). The protease inhibitor (PI) class of ART has most often been studied because early reports suggested an association between PIs and disorders of glucose metabolism.13 Some recent studies have shown an association between the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) class, which is considered the mainstay of effective ART and IR.4,5

Few studies have investigated the interplay of HIV infection, ART use, and non–HIV-related factors with IR. An understanding of the relationship of these factors with IR is imperative, given recent evidence suggesting an increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected individuals. 69 IR is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. To our knowledge, only 1 published prospective study investigated factors associated with IR within the context of HIV infection and relative to HIV-uninfected individuals, but that study was primarily limited to white men.4

We examine the association of both the type and duration of ART exposure and non–HIV-related factors with IR using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) from October 2000 to March 2007 among participants from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), a large ethnically diverse prospective cohort of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women.

METHODS

Setting and Participants

The WIHS is a multicenter prospective cohort study established in 1994 to investigate the progression of HIV in women with and at risk for HIV. A total of 3766 women (2791 HIV-infected and 975 HIV-uninfected) were enrolled in either 1994–1995 (n = 2623) or 2001–2002 (n = 1143) from 6 US cities (Bronx, Brooklyn, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC). Baseline sociodemographic characteristics and HIV risk factors were similar between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women.10,11 An institutional review board approved study protocols and consent forms, and each study participant gave written informed consent.

Every 6 months, participants complete a comprehensive physical examination, provide biologic specimens for CD4 cell count and HIV RNA viral load determination, and complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire, which collects information on demographics, disease characteristics, and specific ART use.

Beginning in October 2000, fasting glucose (FG) and insulin levels were measured after participants had fasted for ≥8 hours (except for intake of prescribed ART). Of the 2870 women with a visit between October 2000 and March 2007, 2583 had at least 1 FG and insulin measurement at the same visit; the first visit with both FG and insulin data available will be referred to as the index visit. Of the 2583 women with an index visit, 68 were excluded due to either a positive (n = 60) or missing (n = 8) report of pregnancy at the index visit. Of the remaining 2515 women, 284 were excluded due to prevalent diabetes mellitus (DM) (defined as a FG ≥ 126 mg/dL or self-reported DM or self-reported anti diabetic medication use, all at or before the index visit). Thirteen women who were HIV-uninfected at WIHS study entry and seroconverted during follow-up were also excluded. Our final study population consisted of 2218 women (1614 HIV-infected and 604 HIV-uninfected) who contributed a total of 11,019 visits with FG and insulin data. The median number of visits with FG and insulin data available for both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women was 5 (interquartile range: 3 –7). One hundred thirty-six HIV-infected women (8% of 1614 HIV-infected women) and 51 HIV-uninfected women (8% of 604 HIV-uninfected women) with incident DM after the index visit were censored at the visit of DM diagnosis and only contributed data to analyses from the index visit through the visit immediately before incident DM. Incident DM was considered to have occurred at the first follow-up visit after the index visit at which: FG ≥ 126 mg/dL, anti-diabetic medication use was reported, or DM was reported with subsequent confirmation by either an FG ≥ 126 mg/dL or report of anti-diabetic medication use.12

Assessment of IR Outcome

IR was quantified using the HOMA, defined as (insulin × glucose)/405 with insulin measured in µIU/mL and glucose measured in mg/dL.13 Fasting specimens for glucose determination were collected in tubes with glycolytic inhibitors. Serum for insulin determination was obtained at the same time, and all specimens were stored at −70°C until the day of assay. Plasma glucose was measured using the hexokinase method, and insulin was measured using the IMMULITE 2000 assay at a central laboratory.

Assessment of ART Use

At each semiannual visit, HIV-infected participants were shown photo-medication cards and were asked the names of specific ART medications used since the previous visit. The WIHS uses a standard definition of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)14 adapted from the Department of Health and Human Services/Kaiser Panel guidelines.15 All non-HAART combination therapy regimens were classified as combination therapy; reports of a single NRTI, PI, or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) were classified as monotherapy.

At each visit from index through the end of follow-up, participants were categorized into 1 of 5 groups based on HIV status and self-reported ART since the previous visit: (a) HIV-uninfected, (b) HIV-infected with no ART, (c) HIV-infected with monotherapy or combination therapy, (d) HIV-infected with PI-based HAART, or (e) HIV-infected with non–PI-based HAART. HIV-infected women reporting no ART use at a particular visit may have been exposed to ART at earlier visits or be completely ART-naive.

At each visit from index through the end of follow-up, we also determined drug-years of exposure to NRTI, PI, and NNRTI as the product of the time (in years) between the current and previous visit and the number of drugs that were reported within a given class of ART (ie, NRTI, PI, and NNRTI) since the previous visit. For each class of ART, drug-years of exposure from the current visit were added to the total drug-years from all previous visits from the index visit forward to measure the duration of cumulative exposure. Drugs within each class were considered exchangeable and additive. Finally, we determined the cumulative drug-years of exposure to the 5 most commonly used NRTIs (ie, lamivudine, zidovudine, stavudine, abacavir, and tenofovir) in our cohort from index visit to the end of follow-up in the same way that we defined the duration of cumulative exposure for NRTI, PI, and NNRTI.

For analyses, we categorized the cumulative exposure to each class of ART and the 5 NRTIs at all person-visits as:(a) unexposed (reference category); (b) exposed and less than or equal to the median; or (c) exposed and greater than the median. In separate analyses, we treated cumulative exposure to each class of ART and the 5 NRTIs as continuous exposures to assess the change in IR per drug-year. In multivariable analyses, we also adjusted for the cumulative duration of exposure to each ART class that was reported from WIHS study entry through the visit immediately before the index visit.

Statistical Analyses

Comparisons of continuous and categorical characteristics among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women at the visit immediately before the index visit were made by Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Pearson χ2 tests, respectively. Linear regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to quantify the association of HIV infection and ART exposures with IR while accounting for the statistical dependence incurred by repeated HOMA over time on the same individual.16 The logarithm of HOMA was modeled as the outcome variable in regression models because the log-transformed HOMAs were more normally distributed than the raw HOMA. Relative median HOMA levels between 2 groups with different exposures were obtained by exponentiation of select model coefficients and used as the measure of association.17 Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) were used as a measure of precision.

Regression models were used to adjust for the potentially confounding effects of variables measured at the visit immediately before the index visit (if data at the visit immediately before index were missing, then data concurrent with the index visit were used). Specifically, we adjusted for race; body mass index (BMI); smoking status (current versus noncurrent); hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status; self-reported family history of DM; menopause; an interaction between HIV infection and CD4 cell count (so that the association between CD4 and HOMA was only assessed in HIV-infected women in adjusted analyses that included both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women); history of ART use before the index visit (defined as the total number of drugs reported within each class of ART at all visits from WIHS baseline until the visit immediately before the index visit; in analyses, we defined exposure before index categorically as no exposure, exposed less than or equal to the median, or exposed greater than the median); and enrollment cohort (2001–2002 versus 1994–1995). To explore changes in body size as a possible pathway through which ART may affect IR, in separate analyses, we further adjusted for time-varying waist and hip size evaluated at the visit concurrent with HOMA assessment. The association of cumulative exposure to different ART exposure groups with HOMA was assessed for different ages in separate analyses by including age-by-ART exposure–interaction terms in indicated multivariable models. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Characteristics of Study Population

At the visit immediately before the index visit, the 1614 HIV-infected women were older, more likely to be post-menopausal, and more likely to be HCV antibody positive than the 604 HIV-uninfected women (Table 1). The distribution of race/ethnicity and the proportion with a family history of DM were similar by HIV status. Both BMI and hip circumference were lower in HIV-infected women, but waist circumference was similar. Median FG levels were similar in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women (83 mg/dL; P = 0.69), but HIV-infected women had higher median insulin levels (11 versus 9 µIU/mL; P < 0.001) and therefore higher median HOMA (2.19 versus 1.83; P < 0.001) at index visit compared with HIV-uninfected women.

TABLE 1
Characteristics at the Study Visit Immediately Before the Index Visit by HIV Status of 2218 Participants of the WIHS*

Thousand five hundred seventy-eight (71.1%) of the 2218 women completed follow-up. One hundred sixty-two of the 1578 women died (150 HIV-infected/12 HIV-uninfected), and the remaining 1416 either had an observed HOMA between April 2006 and March 2007 (876 HIV-infected/353 HIV-uninfected) or were censored at the visit immediately before incident DM (136 HIV-infected/51 HIV-uninfected). The 640 (28.9%) participants who did not complete follow-up had their last HOMA before April 2006 (452 HIV-infected/188 HIV-uninfected).

Recent ART Exposure

The 2218 women contributed a total of 11,019 visits (7983 HIV-infected/3036 HIV-uninfected) with FG and insulin data ( 2 visits contributed by HIV-infected women did not have ART data available, yielding a total of 11,017 visits for analyses). Among women reporting recent ART use, ≥95% adherence to ART was reported at 76.5% of person-visits. Table 2 presents both the unadjusted and adjusted analyses of characteristics potentially associated with IR. HIV-infected women regardless of ART reported since the previous visit had higher HOMA compared with HIV-uninfected women even after adjustment for possible confounders. Relative to the median HOMA of 1.91 in HIV-uninfected women, HIV-infected women reporting a PI-containing HAART regimen demonstrated a median HOMA 1.20 times higher (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.30) and those reporting a non–PI-containing HAART regimen a 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.20) times higher median HOMA. Those women reporting no therapy or either recent monotherapy or combination therapy had HOMA similar to HIV-uninfected women. The 1325 person-years included in the no therapy group in Table 2 were contributed by women who reported no therapy since their last visit but could have reported ART or HAART at prior visits (62% of 1325 person-years) or be completely ART-naive at all prior visits (38% of 1325 person-years).

TABLE 2
Comparison of HOMA Values Among 2218* Women by HIV Infection Status, Most Recent ART Reported, and Demographic and Clinical Factors

Table 2 also shows the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with HOMA. Compared with the respective reference groups, being HCV antibody positive, having a family history of diabetes, having a higher BMI, or reporting menopause were associated with higher HOMA. Being Hispanic was associated with a 1.13-fold higher median HOMA compared with the median HOMA of African American women.

Cumulative ART Exposure

Table 3 presents the unadjusted and adjusted associations between IR and the cumulative number of NRTI-years, PI-years, and NNRTI-years during follow-up among HIV-infected women on any ART regimen. NRTI exposure was associated with a higher median HOMA compared with reporting no NRTI use in the adjusted analysis. Specifically, report of >0 to 3 years of NRTI use had a median HOMA 1.06 times higher (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.16), and report of >3 years of NRTI use had a median HOMA 1.13 times higher (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.25) than the median HOMA of 2.07 when no NRTI was reported. Each additional year of NRTI use was associated with a 2% increase in median HOMA (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.03). Cumulative exposure to PI or NNRTI did not seem to be associated with HOMA. Further adjustment for time-varying changes in hip or waist size did not attenuate the association between cumulative exposure to NRTI and HOMA (results not shown). The effect of the cumulative exposure to each class of ART on HOMA was not modified by age (results not shown).

TABLE 3
Comparison of HOMA Values Among 1614* HIV-Infected Women by Cumulative Amount of Exposure to Each Class of ART Reported At Each Visit

Cumulative Exposure to Zidovudine, Abacavir, Stavudine, Lamivudine, and Tenofovir

Because cumulative NRTI exposure seemed to be most associated with increased HOMA, we evaluated the association between IR and each of the 5 most commonly used NRTIs: lamivudine, zidovudine, stavudine, abacavir, and tenofovir (Table 4). In the multivariable analysis, cumulative exposures of >0 to 1 year or >1 year to stavudine were associated with median HOMA that were 1.07 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.16) and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.27) times higher, respectively, than the median HOMA of 2.15 among those reporting no stavudine use. Each additional year of stavudine use was associated with a 6% increase in median HOMA (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.11). Further adjustment for time-varying changes in hip or waist size did not decrease the association between cumulative exposure to stavudine and HOMA (results not shown). No elevated association between cumulative exposure to lamivudine, zidovudine, abacavir, or tenofovir and HOMA was substantial or were any associations precise enough to rule out chance.

TABLE 4
Comparison of HOMA Values Among 1614* HIV-Infected Women by Cumulative Amount of Zidovudine, Abacavir, Stavudine, Lamivudine, and Tenofovir Reported at Each Visit

DISCUSSION

In this prospective study of IR as measured by the HOMA, we found that among HIV-infected women, longer cumulative NRTI exposure was associated with greater IR in HIV-infected women. Our findings corroborate the results of small studies which have shown an association between duration of NRTI use and fasting hyperinsulinemia18 or IR as measured by HOMA5 and are consistent with those from a large prospective study of HIV-infected men.4 The latter study, which was one of the few studies to examine the independent associations between specific NRTI and IR in HIV-infected men, observed that cumulative use of stavudine and lamivudine was associated with IR.4 In our study, cumulative use of the NRTI, stavudine, was associated with greater IR.

An association between NRTI and IR was also suggested in a study that randomized antiretroviral-naive patients to a PI-containing HAART regimen, an NNRTI-containing HAART regimen, or a PI-containing and NNRTI-containing HAART regimen. That study found that IR increased similarly in all 3 treatment groups over a median of 5 years. In that study, the NRTIs most frequently used as part of the HAART regimen were zidovudine plus lamivudine or stavudine plus lamivudine.19

NRTI-induced mitochondrial dysfunction has been postulated as a mechanism by which NRTI may cause IR.20 A recent study in healthy HIV-uninfected volunteers demonstrated that short-term administration of stavudine reduced insulin sensitivity and decreased mitochondrial DNA in muscle, suggesting that altered mitochondrial function in muscle may be an important factor in the development of IR.21 Stavudine has also been associated with lipoatrophy,2227 and lipoatrophy in turn has been associated with IR.28,29 We observed, however, that after further adjustment for changes in hip (which we have previously demonstrated to be the most affected body site in this cohort30), the association between either NRTI or stavudine use and IR was not attenuated. An alternative hypothesis suggested in another study is that elevations in lactate levels (which have been associated with NRTI use and mitochondrial dysfunction) may negatively influence insulin sensitivity.18

When compared with HIV-uninfected women, HIV-infected women who reported using any HAART regimen at the last visit had greater IR. The strongest association was observed in those reporting recent use of a PI-containing HAART regimen. These findings suggest that both an HAART-associated restoration to health phenomenon and a direct effect of PI may play a role in the observed greater IR in HIV-infected women. Indeed, the association between recent (but not cumulative) PI use and IR is noteworthy. PI use has been associated with IR in HIV-infected individuals in several studies.1,2,31,32 Acute decreases in insulin sensitivity were observed in HIV-uninfected volunteers after a single dose of either indinavir33 or lopinavir/ritonavir,34 a commonly used PI in our study population. However, more recent data suggest that longer PI use may ameliorate the acute induction of IR observed in HIV-uninfected volunteers. In one study, although an acute decrease in insulin sensitivity was observed after a single dose of lopinavir/ritonavir, no change in insulin sensitivity from baseline was observed after 4 weeks on lopinavir/ritonavir.34 Similarly, the acute decrease in insulin sensitivity observed after a single dose of indinavir was ameliorated after 4 weeks of indinavir.35 A possible explanation for the amelioration of IR in these studies was the observed increases in levels of the adipocyte hormone, adiponectin from baseline after 4 weeks of therapy. Adiponectin is associated with increased insulin sensitivity.

Although we found that ART, including class of drug and specific drug, was associated with IR, several non–HIV-related factors were also associated with IR. Factors including family history of diabetes, increased BMI, and HCV seropositivity are recognized risk factors for IR, and these risks are replicated here. We also observed an association between menopause and greater IR; menopause has been associated with increased visceral adipose tissue, a key risk factor for IR. Interestingly, African American race, which has been shown to be associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in HIV-uninfected women,36 was not associated with higher IR compared with white women. A recent study in HIV-infected women found that African American women had less visceral fat than white women,23 which may partly explain our findings. On the other hand, being Hispanic was associated with higher IR when compared with African American or white women.

There are limitations of the current study. First, we defined IR using the HOMA, a surrogate marker, and not the gold standard euglycemic insulin clamp technique.37 Given the nature of our large, multicenter, prospective cohort, detailed testing using a clamp technique was not feasible. Furthermore, HOMA has been shown to be a reasonable marker of IR in large epidemiologic studies.38,39 Second, as with all prospective studies, our findings are subject to possible informative censoring. Third, as with all observational studies, our findings are subject to possible unmeasured confounding. Finally, the design of this cohort study, which examines participants every 6 months, only allows us to coarsely define cumulative exposure to specific ART.

In summary, we conclude that in HIV-infected women, recent use of any HAART regimen was associated with higher IR when compared with HIV-uninfected women. Among HIV-infected women, cumulative exposure to NRTI, but not PI or NNRTI, was independently associated with higher IR. Study of the biologic mechanisms by which exposure to individual ART and classes of ART might induce disorders in glucose metabolism is needed. In addition to antiretroviral drug effects, non–HIV-related factors must also be considered in the development of IR among HIV-infected persons.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Data in this article were collected by the WIHS Collaborative Study Group with centers (principal investigators) at New York City/Bronx Consortium (Kathryn Anastos); Brooklyn, NY (Howard Minkoff); Washington DC Metropolitan Consortium (M. Y.); The Connie Wofsy Study Consortium of Northern California (Ruth Greenblatt); Los Angeles County/Southern California Consortium (A.M.L.); Chicago Consortium (M.C.); and Data Coordinating Center (Stephen J. Gange). Participating institutions approved this study, and consent forms provided to study participants. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation and review of the article.

The Women’s Interagency HIV Study is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, with additional supplemental funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, the National Center for Research Resources, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U01-AI-35004, U01-AI-31834, U01-AI-34994, U01-AI-34994, U01-AI-34989, U01-HD-32632 (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development), U01-AI-34993, U01-AI-42590, M01-RR00079, and M01-RR00083. Dr. P.C.T. is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through K23 AI 66943-01 and currently has a research grant from Gilead.

Footnotes

Dr. P.C.T. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

REFERENCES

1. Behrens G, Dejam A, Schmidt H, et al. Impaired glucose tolerance, beta cell function and lipid metabolism in HIV patients under treatment with protease inhibitors. AIDS. 1999;13:F63–F70. [PubMed]
2. Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S, et al. A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS. 1998;12:F51–F58. [PubMed]
3. Walli R, Herfort O, Michl GM, et al. Treatment with protease inhibitors associated with peripheral insulin resistance and impaired oral glucose tolerance in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 1998;12:F167–F173. [PubMed]
4. Brown TT, Li X, Cole SR, et al. Cumulative exposure to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors is associated with insulin resistance markers in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS. 2005;19:1375–1383. [PubMed]
5. Hadigan C, Meigs JB, Corcoran C, et al. Metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and lipodystrophy. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:130–139. [PubMed]
6. Currier JS, Taylor A, Boyd F, et al. Coronary heart disease in HIV-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:506–512. [PubMed]
7. Friis-Moller N, Sabin CA, Weber R, et al. Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1993–2003. [PubMed]
8. Klein D, Hurley LB, Quesenberry CP, Jr, et al. Do protease inhibitors increase the risk for coronary heart disease in patients with HIV-1 infection? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30:471–477. [PubMed]
9. Vittecoq D, Escaut L, Chironi G, et al. Coronary heart disease in HIV-infected patients in the highly active antiretroviral treatment era. AIDS. 2003;17 Suppl 1:S70–S76. [PubMed]
10. Bacon MC, von Wyl V, Alden C, et al. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study: an observational cohort brings clinical sciences to the bench. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:1013–1019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Barkan SE, Melnick SL, Preston-Martin S, et al. WIHS Collaborative Study Group. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study. Epidemiology. 1998;9:117–125. [PubMed]
12. Tien PC, Schneider MF, Cole SR, et al. Antiretroviral therapy exposure and incidence of diabetes mellitus in theWomen’s Interagency HIV Study. AIDS. 2007;21:1739–1745. [PubMed]
13. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. [PubMed]
14. Cole SR, Hernan MA, Robins JM, et al. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:687–694. [PubMed]
15. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1 Infected Adults and Adolescents. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health; 1998. Panel on clinic practices for treatment of HIV infection. US Department of Health and Human Services and Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
16. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, et al. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002.
17. Cox C, Chu H, Schneider MF, et al. Parametric survival analysis and taxonomy of hazard functions for the generalized gamma distribution. Stat Med. 2007;26:4352–4374. [PubMed]
18. Lo JC, Kazemi MR, Hsue PY, et al. The relationship between nucleoside analogue treatment duration, insulin resistance, and fasting arterialized lactate level in patients with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1335–1340. [PubMed]
19. Shlay JC, Bartsch G, Peng G, et al. Long-term body composition and metabolic changes in antiretroviral naive persons randomized to protease inhibitor-, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-, or protease inhibitor plus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based strategy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:506–517. [PubMed]
20. Shikuma CM, Day LJ, Gerschenson M. Insulin resistance in the HIV-infected population: the potential role of mitochondrial dysfunction. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord. 2005;5:255–262. [PubMed]
21. Fleischman A, Johnsen S, Systrom DM, et al. Effects of a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, stavudine, on glucose disposal and mitochondrial function in muscle of healthy adults. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;292:E1666–E1673. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. FRAM Study Investigators. Fat distribution in men with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40:121–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Fat distribution in women with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:562–571. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Carr A, Workman C, Smith DE, et al. Abacavir substitution for nucleoside analogs in patients with HIV lipoatrophy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;288:207–215. [PubMed]
25. John M, McKinnon EJ, James IR, et al. Randomized, controlled, 48-week study of switching stavudine and/or protease inhibitors to combivir/abacavir to prevent or reverse lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:29–33. [PubMed]
26. Mallal SA, John M, Moore CB, et al. Contribution of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors to subcutaneous fat wasting in patients with HIV infection. AIDS. 2000;14:1309–1316. [PubMed]
27. Martin A, Smith DE, Carr A, et al. Reversibility of lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients 2 years after switching from a thymidine analogue to abacavir: the MITOX Extension Study. AIDS. 2004;18:1029–1036. [PubMed]
28. Meininger G, Hadigan C, Rietschel P, et al. Body-composition measurements as predictors of glucose and insulin abnormalities in HIV-positive men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:460–465. [PubMed]
29. Mynarcik DC, McNurlan MA, Steigbigel RT, et al. Association of severe insulin resistance with both loss of limb fat and elevated serum tumor necrosis factor receptor levels in HIV lipodystrophy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;25:312–321. [PubMed]
30. Tien PC, Schneider MF, Cole SR, et al. Relation of stavudine discontinuation to anthropometric changes among HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:43–48. [PubMed]
31. Dube MP, Edmondson-Melancon H, Qian D, et al. Prospective evaluation of the effect of initiating indinavir-based therapy on insulin sensitivity and B-cell function in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;27:130–134. [PubMed]
32. Walli R, Goebel FD, Demant T. Impaired glucose tolerance and protease inhibitors. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:837–838. [PubMed]
33. Noor MA, Seneviratne T, Aweeka FT, et al. Indinavir acutely inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in humans: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. AIDS. 2002;16:F1–F8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Lee GA, Seneviratne T, Noor MA, et al. The metabolic effects of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-negative men. AIDS. 2004;18:641–649. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Noor MA, Lo JC, Mulligan K, et al. Metabolic effects of indinavir in healthy HIV-seronegative men. AIDS. 2001;15:F11–F18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Torrens JI, Skurnick J, Davidow AL, et al. Ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in premenopausal or early perimenopausal women without diabetes: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Diabetes Care. 2004;27:354–361. [PubMed]
37. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:E214–E223. [PubMed]
38. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:57–63. [PubMed]
39. Hanson RL, Pratley RE, Bogardus C, et al. Evaluation of simple indices of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion for use in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:190–198. [PubMed]