|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The research was designed by K.Y. and M.J. K.Y. and T.Y. oversaw experimental design of biochemical studies, largely performed by S.A. Protein expression and optimization was performed by M.T. Generation of antibodies for protein detection was performed by T.S. P.C. assisted with data collection and interpretation. Psr purification, crystallization, data collection, and structure determination was performed by M.J. Initial phasing and structure interpretation was performed by M.J. and S.I. Preparation of the manuscript was done by M.J. and S.I., while all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Bacterial polysulfide reductase (PsrABC) is an integral membrane protein complex responsible for quinone coupled reduction of polysulfide, a process important in extreme environments such as deep-sea vents and hot springs. We determined the structure of polysulfide reductase from Thermus thermophilus at 2.4 Å resolution, revealing how the PsrA subunit recognizes and reduces its unique poly anionic substrate. The integral membrane subunit PsrC was characterized using the natural substrate menaquinone-7 and inhibitors, providing a comprehensive representation of a quinone binding site and revealing the presence of a water filled cavity connecting the quinone binding site on the periplasmic side to the cytoplasm. These results suggest that polysulfide reductase could be a key energy-conserving enzyme of the T. thermophilus respiratory chain, utilizing polysulfide as the terminal electron acceptor and pumping protons across the membrane via a previously unknown mechanism.
Thermus thermophilus is an obligate aerobe that resides in geothermal hot springs and has received considerable attention due to its biotechnological potential1. The energy coupling enzymes of this organism have been characterized, and several characteristic components of an aerobic electron transfer chain have been identified; a proton-translocating NADH:quinone oxidoreductase composed of 15 subunits with menaquinone-7 (MK-7) as the endogenous electron acceptor2,3, a soluble cytochrome c552 (ref. 4), a bc1 complex5, and two terminal enzymes: a ba3- and a caa3-type heme-copper oxidase6,7. The former is a high-affinity oxidase expressed during low oxygen tension8,9, while the latter is observed during normal oxygen levels10. Interestingly, in addition to these enzymes, sequencing of the T. thermophilus (HB27) genome revealed the presence of a gene cluster encoding a polysulfide reductase1 (Psr).
Psr is the enzyme responsible for quinone-coupled reduction of polysulfides, a class of compounds composed of chains of sulfur atoms, which in their simplest form are present as an anion with general formula Sn2−. In nature, polysulfides are found in particularly high concentrations in extreme environments, usually volcanic or geothermically active, such as deep-sea vents and hot springs11. Here, the reduction and oxidation of polysulfides are vital processes for many bacteria and are essential steps in the global sulfur cycle. In particular, the reduction of polysulfide to hydrogen sulfide in these environments is usually linked to energy-generating respiratory processes, supporting growth of many microorganisms, particularly hyperthermophiles12,13.
Psr is a membrane bound enzyme belonging to a well studied molybdenum (Mo) or tungsten (W) containing enzyme family; the Mo/W bis-MGD oxidoreductases14. The bis-MGD enzymes are generally composed of two membrane associated subunits and one integral membrane subunit with five to nine membrane spanning helices (TMs). Psr has an integral membrane subunit predicted to have eight TMs15, which does not contain any redox centres, such as the heme b molecules found in many other membrane-bound bis-MGD enzymes16,17.
During the reaction cycle of Psr, two electrons and two protons are released from the bound substrate, MK-7, and the electrons are transferred via five 4Fe-4S iron-sulfur clusters to the bis-MGD cofactor to reduce polysulfide. The reactions Psr catalyzes are summarized as follows (also see Fig. 1);
Previously, it has been shown that another bis-MGD enzyme, the periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap), is coupled to aerobic respiration in Rhodobacter sphaeroides18, where it is suggested to play a key role in redox balancing and protecting the cell from over-reduction of the quinone pool19. Recently it was also revealed that, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) reductase, a bis-MGD enzyme, is expressed in high levels in Escherichia coli during aerobic growth. This enzyme was proposed to be involved in pH homeostasis20. Taken together, these results suggest that bis-MGD enzymes have more versatile and diverse roles in cellular homeostasis and physiology than previously thought.
High expression levels of Psr have been detected in T. thermophilus during aerobic growth. Hence, the existence of a classically anaerobic sulfur enzyme in T. thermophilus raises intriguing questions with regard to physiological function, and what potential importance it plays in cellular respiration. Furthermore, whereas enzyme activity involving oxygen atom transfer to or from substrate has been well characterized for bis-MGD enzymes21-23, the precise mechanism by which microorganisms reduce sulfur remain unclear.
In an effort to answer these questions, and to define the architecture of polysulfide reductases and related enzymes, we have determined the high-resolution structures of native and quinone-bound polysulfide reductase from T. thermophilus. The structures provide comprehensive insight into quinone-linked polysulfide reduction, and we propose a possible key link to T. thermophilus energy conservation via a previously uncharacterized proton pumping mechanism.
We have solved crystal structures of the native T. thermophilus Psr and complexes of Psr with three quinone analogs. The crystal packing reveals an (ABC)2 dimer configuration, with a total molecular weight of ~260 kDa (Fig. 1). The dimer is likely to be physiological. This is supported by an extensive interface between the two heterotrimeric (ABC) monomers (2,614 Å2), and an intricate hydrogen bond network between the PsrB subunits in the dimer. A dimeric configuration was also found to be physiological for nitrate reductase (NarGHI), another membrane-bound enzyme in the bis-MGD oxidoreductase family17. The overall molecular organization of PsrABC resembles those of formate dehydrogenase-N (FdnGHI) and NarGHI16,17, with two membrane associated (PsrA and PsrB) and one integral membrane subunit (PsrC).
The PsrA and PsrB subunits are situated on the same side of the inner membrane as the N- and C-terminus of the PsrC subunit, which hydropathy analyses indicate to be situated in the periplasm15,24. In addition, the N-terminus of PsrA contains a ‘twin arginine translocase’ (TAT) motif, indicating that this subunit is a substrate of the TAT translocase machinery25. N-terminal sequencing and the structure of the PsrA subunit illustrate an absence of the first 28 amino acids (including the TAT signal motif), suggesting that this signal has been processed and that the PsrAB dimer is situated in the periplasmic space.
The PsrA subunit (733 residues) contains two molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide cofactors (bis-MGD), designated P and Q following the DMSO reductase nomenclature26, and a cubane-type [4Fe-4S] cluster.
The subunit folds into four distinct domains that are related by an internal pseudo two-fold symmetry. Domain I includes four Cys residues coordinating the [4Fe-4S] cluster, designated FeS-0. Domains II and III form α/β sandwiches, anchoring the bis-MGD cofactor through multiple hydrogen-bonding interactions. The fourth domain is a β-barrel structure and participates in the coordination of the bis-MGD cofactor. The four domains can be superimposed on the corresponding domains of the FdnG subunit from E. coli FdnGHI with an r.m.s. deviation of 1.84 Å for 525 Cα atoms, using the program O27. The major differences between the two structures are found in the channel leading from the periplasm to the active site. The region is shaped like a ‘funnel’, formed by the α/β sandwiches in Domains II and III, with the active site situated at the bottom (Fig. 2a, b). The opening of the funnel is narrow, and residues (predominantly with basic side chains) lining the entrance are possibly important for substrate selectivity, as has been suggested for other bis-MGD enzymes28.
The crystals of Psr were obtained under oxidizing (aerobic) conditions. The Mo is therefore likely to be present in its oxidized MoVI state. In the crystal structure of the native enzyme, the Mo ion is coordinated by the sulfur group of CysA173, and a water molecule (w73), in addition to the four sulfurs provided by the cis-thiolate groups of the bis-MGD cofactor (Fig. 2a). The average distance between the cis-thiolate S and Mo is 2.35 Å, while the distances between Mo and S (CysA173), and Mo to w73 are 2.24 Å and 2.14 Å respectively. The coordination geometry of the Mo ion resembles that of a trigonal prism, in agreement with previous bis-MGD structures14. The distance between w73 and Mo indicates that it is an oxo (O=) group and not a hydroxide (OH-) group. An additional water molecule (w201) is situated 2.52 Å from w73 (Fig. 2a). In our structure, ArgA332 provides hydrogen bonds to the two water molecules.
This ligation pattern where an Arg residue is coordinating two water molecules is a common feature among peroxidases29,30, although it has previously not been observed in bis-MGD enzymes. In peroxidases, an Arg residue coordinates two water molecules that are generated through the reduction of H2O2, a reaction that is catalyzed by a His residue and heme Fe29,30. By structural analogy, it is possible that the two water molecules (w73, w201) in our structure represent the positions of two sulfur atoms in the polysulfide substrate, and that ArgA332 is key to the coordination of the substrate at the active site. In addition, Nε2 of HisA145 lies in close proximity to w201 and could be involved during substrate turnover, possibly acting as a general acid-base catalyst in the reaction, as observed in peroxidases29.
Other residues in close proximity to the active site include PheA48, ArgA50, SerA169, ThrA174, and HisA215, which may be involved in substrate specificity or in the catalytic cycle (Fig. 2). PheA48 corresponds to Trp116 in R. capsulatus DMSO reductase, a residue that has been shown to be important for substrate coordination31. In addition, HisA215 may be involved in proton delivery to the active site; a highly structured solvent chain leads from this residue to the exterior of the protein (Fig. 2b).
Previously, structural determination of bis-MGD enzymes has illustrated details of catalytic reactions involving transfer of an oxygen atom32. In contrast, the tetrathionate-, thiosulfate-, and polysulfide reductases catalyse reactions involve either sulfur transfer (rather than oxygen transfer) or reductive cleavage of an S–S bond33. In these reactions it has been postulated that the substrate remains directly ligated to the Mo center during the catalytic cycle, giving a Mo[S]6 core34. Assuming that S atoms replace water molecules w73 and w201, we can postulate that Mo is indeed hexa-coordinated by S atoms during the catalytic cycle, and that ArgA332 is acting as a direct ligand to the substrate. Hence, binding of the substrate would cleave the polysulfide, releasing S(n-1)2− and leaving a Mo[S]6 core. The delivery of electrons and protons would thereafter generate H2S and leave a Mo[S]5 core.
The PsrB subunit is composed of 194 residues and belongs to a superfamily of [4Fe-4S] containing electron transfer subunits that are commonly found in oxidoreductases35. Accordingly, PsrB shows high sequence identity with the corresponding subunits of tetrathionate and membrane bound DMSO reductases, and has a similar fold to the corresponding subunit of Nar and Fdh-N.
The four FeS clusters in PsrB and FeS-0 (in PsrA) are aligned in a single chain, and the distances between the adjacent redox centers are well within the 14 Å limit for physiological electron transfer36 (Fig. 1). The redox potentials for the Psr clusters are not known; however, those for E.coli DMSO reductase and Nar have been determined to −50/180 (FeS-4), −120/−50 (FeS-3), −330/−420 (FeS-2), and −240/130 (FeS-1) mV, respectively37. The clusters for both of these enzymes show a similar distribution of redox potentials. Therefore it is possible that the Psr clusters follow the same pattern. It has been observed that these enzymes show much faster enzymatic turnovers than the calculated electron transfer rates based on the measured redox potentials and distances36. This is explained by the re-organization of charges during the electron transfer, which affects the redox potentials of the clusters. This also seems to be the case for Psr as the reported kcat, ca 3,000 s−1 for polysulfide reduction using tetrahydrobiopterin38, is considerably faster than the estimated electron transfer rate (several 100 ms) based on the distances for Psr and the redox potentials for DMSO reductase36,37.
In DMSO reductase, the FeS-4 of DmsB (corresponding to PsrB) has been shown to be the first electron acceptor in the electron transfer pathway from MKH2 to Mo36, and mutations to residues in the immediate environment of FeS-4 were shown to have a marked effect on the electron transfer from MKH2 to the cluster. The DmsB mutant Pro80His/Pro80Asp rendered the enzyme incapable of accepting electrons from the MKH2 site37. The corresponding residue in our structure (ProB71) lies proximal to FeS-4 and in the direct pathway of electrons from MKH2 to FeS-4. Mutations to these residues could therefore lead to structural rearrangements in the local environment, impairing electron transfer from the quinone binding pocket (see below) to the FeS-4.
The PsrC subunit (250 residues) is composed of eight transmembrane helices, (labeled tmI-tmVIII), which are divided into two four-helix bundles designated hb1 (N-terminal) and hb2 (C-terminal) (Fig. 3). PsrC contains the MKH2 oxidation site, but lacks other redox centres. The two four-helix bundles are tilted approximately 15° to the membrane normal in opposite directions, resembling the letter ‘X’. Both the N- and C-termini are situated in the periplasmic space, and are tethered to the rest of the protein through an intricate hydrogen-bonding network. The loops connecting the eight TMs of PsrC are shorter than in homologous subunits (see below), a typical property of thermostable proteins39. Two C subunits form a very stable dimer through the extensive hydrophobic interactions between the hb2 domains (buried surface ~745 Å2). The sequences of hb1 and hb2 show a considerable (26%) identity indicating that PsrC is a product of a gene duplication event. However, the two domains differ in the lengths and tilt angles of the individual helices, preventing superimposition of their 3D structures.
The overall tertiary fold of the subunit is very different from the membrane anchors of other structurally characterized quinone-oxidoreductases. Previous structures of membrane-bound bis-MGD enzymes have revealed five TMs16,17, while succinate dehydrogenases and fumarate reductases contain six TMs40-44. The Psr structure is the first representative of the ‘NrfD-type’ family (Pfam 03916) of membrane-bound bis-MGD quinone-oxidoreductases. This includes tetrathionate-, DMSO-, polysulfide, and nitrite reductases (NrfD). These enzymes have in common a subunit with 8 or 9 predicted TMs and have an active site on the periplasmic side of the membrane, which receives electrons from quinol oxidation sites situated in membrane embedded subunits33.
The quinone binding site was characterized by co-crystallization experiments using (i) MK-7, the only known quinone of T. thermophilus3, (ii) an inhibitor pentachlorophenol (PCP) and (iii) ubiquinone-1 (UQ1). In the crystal structures, all three compounds were found in the same pocket, suggesting this site is the physiological quinone-binding site (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1 and 2 online). The pocket is situated on the periplasmic side of the membrane in the N-terminal four-helix bundle (hb1), and in close proximity to FeS-4 (Fig. 3). It is composed of residues from tmII, tmIII and the horizontal helix between tmII and tmIII (hII-III) of hb1 and from a short loop region (residues B91-B95) of the PsrB subunit.
The pocket is mainly hydrophobic, with the quinone sandwiched between LeuC64 and IleC89, and surrounded by the side chains of TrpC14, PheC22, LeuC79, AlaC93, LeuC96, and IleB91. The three quinone analog complexes exhibit slight variations with respect to the hydrogen bonding of the substrate (Fig. 4). In the MK-7 bound structure, the side chain of TyrC130 is a direct ligand of the O1 carbonyl group. The nearby HisC21 is too far away to provide an additional hydrogen bond (O1- HisC21 4.1 Å). However, in the PCP bound structure, both TyrC130 and HisC21 act as ligands to the hydroxyl group of PCP, which is equivalent to O1 in MK-7. Hence, we cannot exclude the possibility that HisC21 takes part in quinone binding. Histidine residues are often involved in quinone coordination16,17. Interestingly, the equivalent residue to T. thermophilus HisC21 is a Tyr residue in all homologous enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 3 online). Replacement of this residue with a phenylalanine in PsrC of W. succinogenes (Y23F) causes loss of enzyme activity38, indicating that a polar or ionizing residue at this position is essential for activity and/or quinone binding. The O4 carbonyl of MK-7 is un-coordinated in the crystal structure. However, it is possible that water molecules not resolved in the electron density map are acting as ligands, as was suggested for Nar, Fdh-N, and Sqr16,17,40. It is also possible that the reduced MK-7 binds slightly differently in the binding pocket during the oxidation cycle, as proposed for Sqr45. In the UQ1-Psr complex structure, AsnC18 is hydrogen bonded to the methoxy1 group of UQ1, thus this residue could also be involved in the substrate specificity or form a part of the proton ejection pathway to the periplasm.
Other residues in the quinone binding pocket, which may play a role in the oxidation cycle of MKH2, are the ionisable residues AspC60 and GluC67. AspC60 is not found in other NrfD type enzymes; AspC60 is in hydrogen bonding distance to HisC21, and sequence alignment shows that the hydrogen bonded pair of AspC60 and HisC21 are in all related enzymes replaced by a tyrosine residue (Supplementary Fig. 3). GluC67 is invariantly a carboxyl or histidine residue in NrfD type enzymes and some mutants of this residue have reduced activity in W. succinogenes, indicating that it could be involved in proton transfer from the Q-site to periplasm38.
In the C-terminal four-helix bundle, hb2, no binding pocket for quinone or any other cofactor was found. However, the domain contains several conserved residues that could be of functional importance. A charged residue, ArgC239 (tmVIII; Fig. 3), is in close proximity to the MK-7 binding site. This residue is strictly conserved in polysulfide-, tetrathionate-, nitrite-, and DMSO reductases. The corresponding residue in the homologous W. succinogenes PsrC subunit was mutated (R305K; W. succinogenes numbering) and resulted in an inactive enzyme38. It was suggested that the Arg residue stabilizes the deprotonated quinone38. However, in our structure the guanidinium group is situated ~ 10 Å from the quinone (ArgC239- MK-7 O1) and approximately 5 Å toward the cytoplasmic side of the membrane median. Although the residue could still be coupled to the charge of the quinone, it is too far away to be directly involved in quinone binding. One possible role for ArgC239 is in stabilization of the helices close to the MK binding site. The guanadinium group of ArgC239 is hydrogen bonded to the main chain carbonyl groups of PheC22 and PheC152, bridging tmI and tmV. In Fdh-N a histidine residue (Hisβ275) was proposed to play a similar role16.
A more intriguing proposal would be that ArgC239 is part of a conformational proton pump. Psr has been reported to have an H+/e− ratio of 0.5 (ref. 38,46). In other words, Psr could translocate one H+ from the cytoplasm to the periplasm during the two electron reduction of polysulfide using MKH2. Our Psr structure reveals that the MKH2 binding site is on the periplasmic side. This means that there is no charge/proton transfer during the reactions, given that both protons from MKH2 are released into the periplasm (two protons and two electrons are released from MKH2 and received by polysulfide on the same side of the membrane).
In addition, the Psr structure reveals that PsrC accommodates a possible proton relay network. Central to this is a hydrophilic cavity partially occupied by water molecules (Fig. 3). This is similar to proton pathways observed in cytochrome c oxidases47,48. The relay network starts from GluC224 and ArgC177 on the cytoplasmic surface of hb2, and leads through hb2 to ArgC239 via ThrC220, SerC183, a water molecule and ThrC155 (Fig. 3). The pathway from this point is less clear. One possibility is that it reaches the periplasmic surface through several polar residues in the hb2. More likely the pathway crosses over to hb1 and connects to AspC60 and HisC21, via three water molecules observed around ArgC239 (Fig. 3). Taken together, this suggests that Psr could incorporate an additional proton-translocation-machinery, energized by redox reactions in the quinone site as proposed for Complex I (ref. 49,50). Such proton-translocation-machinery based on redox reactions coupled to conformational changes would provide an attractive mechanism for efficient energy conservation in T. thermophilus.
Confirmation of the precise nature and functional role of this proposed proton pathway awaits future experiments. In these, mutagenesis work should be paralleled with the development of reliable activity assay systems for both polysulfide reduction by MKH2 and proton pumping, which to date has been difficult due to fast self-oxidation of MKH2 and high proton permeability of liposomes at the physiological temperature of the enzyme (ca 440K). Also, the key residues shown in this paper are, despite a general low homology between thermophilic and mesophilic organisms, conserved in homologous enzymes in other bacteria. Therefore, comparative studies with other members of the ‘NrfD-type’ family would be very informative, as it has (for example) been reported that E. coli DMSO reductase does not translocate protons51.
The crystal structure of Psr presented here provides molecular insight into sulfur reduction by bis-MGD enzymes. The proximate environment of the active site in PsrA indicate that ArgA332 is critical for substrate coordination, and comparison with peroxidase reveal a plausible reaction mechanism for reduction of polysulfide. Furthermore, the structural information provided by the quinone analog complexes presents a major contribution to the limited number of available structures of quinone-interacting membrane complexes. Analysis of the complexes provides a detailed characterization of the MK-7 binding site in PsrC (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 2). A number of residues were identified as important for quinone coordination and proton removal, although the relative importance of the individual residues is difficult to establish, as there could be conformational flexibility during the quinone turnover. However, mutants of equivalent residues to HisC21, TyrC130, and GluC67 in W. succinogenes38 nearly abolished activity, indicating that these are of particular importance.
The structure of Psr unveiled a new architecture of the membrane anchor protein. The detailed structural analyses lead to the proposal of a proton pump scheme utilizing conformational change in the membrane domain. Previous studies of membrane bound bis-MGD enzymes have shed light on anaerobic proton motive force generation by the redox loop mechanism and provided details with regard to their catalytic mechanisms16,17. Psr has previously only been discussed in anaerobic respiratory pathways where they have been implicated as a component of redox loops. However, high expression levels of an electroneutral Psr under aerobic conditions contradicts previous observations and it raises questions with regard to its coupling to respiration in T. thermophilus. One explanation is that in hot springs, where the dissolved oxygen level is low, presence of an alternative oxidase system that can utilize abundant polysulfide for proton pumping would provide a selective advantage.
In summary, our structural studies represent an important first step towards a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism and function of polysulfide reductase and provide a framework for further investigations. Importantly the structure not only confirms many previous functional and mechanistic proposals, but also engenders a number of new experimentally testable hypotheses.
We cultured T. thermophilus cells as described in ref. 52. After harvesting, cells were run twice through a French press and membranes were harvested by centrifugation for 3 hours at 45k × g. Membranes were resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, before addition of Triton-X100 (Tx100) to a final concentration of 10 % (v/v). Unsolubilized protein and debris were pelleted by centrifugation at 45,000 × g, and the supernatant containing the solubilized membrane protein was applied to a pre-equilibrated (buffer A; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 + 0.1 % (v/v) Tx100) Q-Sepharose FF column (Pharmacia, Sweden). Protein was eluted using a linear gradient from buffer A to buffer B (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 0.1 % (v/v) Tx100), with Psr eluted at approximately 250 mM NaCl.
Psr containing fractions were concentrated and diluted with buffer A until the NaCl concentration was approximately 100 mM. The sample was then applied to a DEAE column (Merck, Germany), pre-equilibrated with buffer C (buffer A + 100 mM NaCl), and eluted with a linear gradient from 100-280 mM NaCl. Psr fractions were pooled, concentrated, and loaded onto a Superdex-200 gel filtration column (Pharmacia, Sweden). The column was pre-equilibrated and run at 0.5 ml min−1 with buffer containing 30 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.05 % (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM). Psr eluted from the gelfiltation step was buffer exchanged to 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 containing 0.05 % (w/v) DDM using an Amicon Ultra-15 with 100 Mw cut-off filter and concentrated to approximately 15 mg ml−1. The purity of the sample was approximately 95 %, as estimated by SDS-PAGE, and individual subunits were confirmed by mass spectrometry.
The native complex was crystallized at 20°C by the hanging drop vapour diffusion method, by mixing 1 μl of protein solution with 1 μl of reservoir solution containing 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 30-34 % (v/v) PEG400, and 200 mM CaCl2. Crystals appeared within 48 hours and grew to full size in approximately 2 weeks. The contents of the crystals were confirmed by analyzing washed and dissolved crystals on SDS-PAGE. Data for menaquinone- or inhibitor-bound structures were obtained from co-crystallization experiments, where the menaquinone/inhibitor was added to the reservoir solution before mixing with protein solution. Concentrations for inhibitors in co-crystallization setups were 0.5 mM for PCP, and 1mM for UQ1 and MK-7 (all from Sigma).
The data collection and structure refinement statistics are presented in Table 1. Three wavelength MAD data near the Fe K-edge were collected with a MARmosaic 225 CCD detector at beamline ID23-1 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, Grenoble). PCP-inhibitor data were collected with an ADSC Q4 CCD detector at beamline ID14-2 at ESRF, while native (high-resolution), Q1- and MK-7 complex data were collected using a MARmosaic 300 detector at beamline ID23-D at the Advanced Photon Source (APS, Chicago). All image data were collected at 100K and processed using Denzo & Scalepack53 or Mosflm54 and Scala55. Crystals belonged to the orthorhombic space group P212121 with cell dimensions a = 115.3 Å, b = 163.6 Å, and c = 238.9 Å containing two molecules in the asymmetric unit. The positions of the ten iron-sulfur clusters in the asymmetric unit were initially determined using MAD peak data in SnB56. The phasing power values (acentric/centric) were 0.76/0.26 and 0.85/0.26 for the Fe peak and inflection data sets, respectively. The ‘superclusters’ were refined using MLPHARE55, followed by 100 cycles of density modification in DM55, using two-fold non-crystallographic symmetry averaging and 72 % solvent content. DM was furthermore used for phase extension to 2.8 Å resolution (high resolution native data; Table 1), after which the density was readily interpretable (Supplementary Fig. 4 online).
The model was manually built into the experimental density map using the program O28. Refinement was carried out with alternating cycles of REFMAC55 and manual rebuilding. Water molecules were found using the program ARP57, and final refinement rounds were performed using the program CNS58, with the native structure refined to 2.4 Å resolution with Rwork of 0.249 and Rfree of 0.253. The final model contains two molecules with a total of 2,346 residues, ten [4Fe-4S] clusters, two Mo-bis-MGD cofactors, and 1306 water molecules. The geometry of the model was checked using the program PROCHECK59. For the final refined structure, 84.7% and 15.3% of the residues were in the favored and allowed regions, respectively, of the Ramachandran plot.
Structures of inhibitor bound complexes and native high-resolution structure were obtained by rigid body refinement using REFMAC55, and final refinement in CNS58. All water molecules from the native high-resolution structure were kept for the quinone analog complexes as this gave the lowest R-values.
This study was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC; DP0666970 to M.J.), Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (No. 18370055 and 19042008 to K.Y.). M.J. was recipient of the EMBO Long-term Fellowship. Data collection was done at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and GM/CA-CAT at Advanced Photon Source (APS). The authors acknowledge support of Stephen Corcoran, Nagarajan Venugopolan, and Michael Becker at GM/CA-CAT, and beamline scientists at ID23-1, ESRF, for scientific support and assistance with data collection. GM/CA-CAT beamline (ID23) is supported by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of General Medical Science. Visits to APS were supported by Australian Nuclear Science Technology Organization (ANSTO). A part of the work was performed at the Diamond Membrane protein Laboratory supported by the Wellcome trust. M.J. has been a European Molecular Biology Organization Long-Term Fellow. We thank U. Kappler, M. Maher, M. Rapp, B. Byrne, and L. Carpenter for critical assessment of the manuscript.
Accession codes. Protein Data Bank: Coordinates and structure factors for the native and quinone analog complexes have been deposited with accession codes 2VPW (MK-7), 2VPX (UQ1), 2VPY (PCP), and 2VPZ (native).