|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Vertebrates show clear asymmetry in left-right (L-R) patterning of their organs and associated vasculature. During mammalian development a cilia driven leftwards flow of liquid leads to the left-sided expression of Nodal, which in turn activates asymmetric expression of the transcription factor Pitx2. While Pitx2 asymmetry drives many aspects of asymmetric morphogenesis, it is clear from published data that additional asymmetrically expressed loci must exist.
A L-R expression screen identified the cytoskeletally-associated gene, actin binding lim protein 1 (Ablim1), as asymmetrically expressed in both the node and left lateral plate mesoderm (LPM). LPM expression closely mirrors that of Nodal. Significantly, Ablim1 LPM asymmetry was detected in the absence of detectable Nodal. In the node, Ablim1 was initially expressed symmetrically across the entire structure, resolving to give a peri-nodal ring at the headfold stage in a flow and Pkd2-dependent manner. The peri-nodal ring of Ablim1 expression became asymmetric by the mid-headfold stage, showing stronger right than left-sided expression. Node asymmetry became more apparent as development proceeded; expression retreated in an anticlockwise direction, disappearing first from the left anterior node. Indeed, at early somite stages Ablim1 shows a unique asymmetric expression pattern, in the left lateral plate and to the right side of the node.
Left LPM Ablim1 is expressed in the absence of detectable LPM Nodal, clearly revealing existence of a Pitx2 and Nodal-independent left-sided signal in mammals. At the node, a previously unrecognised action of early nodal flow and Pkd2 activity, within the pit of the node, influences gene expression in a symmetric manner. Subsequent Ablim1 expression in the peri-nodal ring reveals a very early indication of L-R asymmetry. Ablim1 expression analysis at the node acts as an indicator of nodal flow. Together these results make Ablim1 a candidate for controlling aspects of L-R identity and patterning.
While vertebrates are externally mirror symmetrical between their left and right sides, internally the positioning and patterning of their organs and vasculature show marked left-right (L-R) asymmetry. The heart and its associated vasculature, the lungs and various elements of the gut show distinct L-R asymmetric patterning. The importance of correctly establishing L-R asymmetry is evident when the association between situs defects and disease is analysed. A strong association is evident with congenital heart disease  while links also exist with ciliary dyskinesia, cystic kidney disease and extrahepatic biliary atresia [2,3].
During mammalian development, the first morphological sign of L-R asymmetry is the looping of the primitive heart tube, initially to the right. Shortly after this the embryo begins to undergo embryonic turning, the process that results in the embryo taking up the classic foetal position. This occurs in a L-R asymmetric manner such that the caudal-most region of the embryo passes to the right side of the head. These morphological asymmetries are, however, prefigured by molecular asymmetries. Work over the past decade has resulted in a broadly accepted model explaining how L-R asymmetry is established in the mammalian embryo (reviewed ).
Initial asymmetry is believed to be established when posteriorly tilted cilia within the embryonic node rotate to drive a leftwards flow of liquid (nodal flow). The role of flow in establishing situs was demonstrated in elegant experiments applying artificial flow to embryos in culture; flow reproducibly directed normally left-sided gene expression downstream of the direction of flow . The question of how the embryo perceives nodal flow remains unresolved, although various models exist. One model argues that a morphogen is carried leftwards by the flow . A second, the two cilia model , argues that mechanosensory cilia directly sense nodal flow, resulting in a left-sided intracellular calcium signal. The third model argues that membrane bound vesicles, termed nodal vesicular parcels (NVPs), are carried leftwards by the flow, breaking on the left side of the node to release a cargo of morphogens . At present no one model fully explains all the existing experimental data . The resulting signal at the left side of the node is then communicated several cell diameters to the left lateral plate, possibly through intracellular calcium signalling .
In the left lateral plate, the gene encoding the signalling molecule Nodal is asymmetrically activated downstream of nodal flow. Little is known of the mechanism of this activation. Nodal is at the top of a left-sided genetic cascade, auto-activating its own expression as well as that of its antagonist Lefty2 and the downstream transcription factor Pitx2 (reviewed ). All are asymmetrically expressed prior to the appearance of morphological asymmetry . While Nodal and Lefty2 are expressed for only 6-8 hours , asymmetric Pitx2 expression is maintained into organogenesis and has been argued to be the ultimate effecter of left identity [11,12]. However, Pitx2 null embryos do not lose all aspects of left sidedness, making it clear that additional uncharacterised signals help distinguish the left and right sides of the early embryo .
We set out to identify additional asymmetric genes using a micro array based approach. This resulted in the identification of asymmetric expression of actin binding lim protein 1 (Ablim1), a gene showing asymmetry of expression in both the left LPM and the node. The lateral plate expression broadly mirrors that of Nodal, yet uniquely for a left LPM expressed locus, we demonstrate that it can be asymmetrically expressed in the absence of detectable LPM Nodal. This makes it clear that there is an additional uncharacterised asymmetric LPM signal. Initial Ablim1 expression in the ventral node was downregulated and peri-nodal expression upregulated in a flow and Pkd2-dependent manner, revealing an asymmetry independent role for flow in regulating gene expression within the node. The first node asymmetry was seen at the late headfold stage, earlier than any previously characterised L-R asymmetry in the mouse. Subsequently, the peri-nodal ring of expression retreated asymmetrically, moving around the node in a clockwise direction. Together these results reveal a Nodal-independent asymmetric LPM signal and make Ablim1 a candidate for controlling aspects of L-R identity and patterning.
To identify genes asymmetrically expressed between left and right sides in the developing embryo we compared gene expression using the MRC Mouse Known Gene Oligo Array printed array slides (Mm_SGC_Av2), which identify 7455 known loci. Left and right lateral plate tissue was dissected from 3-6 somite embryos and pools from 4 embryos were used to prepare RNA. Following SMART PCR amplification, hybridisation and analysis were performed as described in the Materials and Methods. The results from 4 replicates were analysed, and lists ranking the apparent degree of left or right sided asymmetry were generated (see Additional file 1). The presence, at the top of the left-sided list of the known left specific gene, Pitx2, demonstrated the validity of the approach. Significantly, Nodal, though present on the array, was not identified; Lefty2 was not present on the array. We further analysed expression of 7 loci from the left-sided and 6 from the right sided list by RNA wholemount in situ hybridisation (WISH) on 8.5 dpc embryos. Of the 13 loci examined, only one, Ablim1, showed apparent L-R asymmetry of expression (Fig. (Fig.11 and data not shown). Expression in the left LPM was clearly stronger and more extensive than in the right, while a second asymmetric domain was visible at the node. Initial analysis of a few embryos showed expression predominantly on the right hand side of the node.
Performing WISH using the full cDNA, we examined Ablim1 expression in a developmental series of embryos, from 6.5 dpc to 9.5 dpc (Fig. 1b-e). Expression was detected in the yolk sac of 6.5 dpc embryos, initially as patches (Fig. (Fig.1b)1b) that became a distinct ring of expression by 7.5 dpc (Fig. (Fig.1c),1c), consistent with it marking the prospective blood islands. At 7.5 dpc, expression was also seen in the developing head folds (Fig. (Fig.1c),1c), an expression pattern maintained through 9.5 dpc (Fig. 1d, e). Ablim1 expression in the node was seen from 7.5 dpc (Fig. (Fig.1c).1c). By 8.5 dpc L-R symmetric expression was evident in the developing heart. Strikingly, asymmetric expression was also seen in the LPM; stronger and more extensive on the left than the right (Fig. (Fig.1d).1d). By 9.5 dpc expression was evident in the head, the somites and portions of the heart, but no L-R asymmetry was seen at this stage (Fig. (Fig.1e,1e, data not shown).
Analysis of the published data  and ESTs http://www.ensembl.org demonstrates the existence of multiple Ablim1 transcripts, exhibiting both alternative splicing and multiple alternative first exons. Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis confirmed the existence of Ablim1 transcripts in 7.5 and 8.5 dpc embryos (data not shown). While multiple protein isoforms of Ablim1 exist, they comprise two major classes; long forms containing lim domains and a villin head piece (VHP) and a short form lacking the lim domains  (Fig. (Fig.1a).1a). We investigated the temporospatial distribution of the transcripts encoding these isoforms using WISH probes hybridising to different portions of the Ablim1 message; probes corresponding to the beginning (Ex 2-6), the common region (Ex 8-25) and the 3'UTR (3'UTRa and b; Fig. Fig.1).1). The Ex 2-6 probe, encompassing the lim domains, revealed expression in the developing heart (Fig. (Fig.1f)1f) as well as the right side of the node when WISH colour development was extended for longer times (Fig. (Fig.1j),1j), but not in the lateral plate. The Ex 8-25 probe revealed asymmetric expression to the right side of the node and in the left lateral plate; symmetric expression was evident in the head and heart (Fig. 1g, k). The 3'UTRa probe showed similar expression to Ex8-25, although node expression was significantly weaker when compared to the other expression domains (Fig. 1h, l). The terminal 3'UTR probe, 3'UTRb, showed similar expression, but failed to detect node expression, arguing for a shorter 3'UTR in the node transcripts (Fig. 1i, m). Together these results argue that a transcript encoding a long isoform containing both lim domains and VHP is present in the node, while a shorter isoform (with no lim domains) is present in the left lateral plate; it is not possible to say from our WISH or RT-PCR analysis whether the short isoform is also present in the node.
Nodal, often thought of as the master gene controlling left-sided gene expression, is expressed in the left but not right lateral plate from 3-6 somite stages [14,15]. If asymmetric Ablim1 expression is directly controlled by Nodal, it would be expected to exhibit similar temporospatial expression and not be expressed asymmetrically prior to asymmetric Nodal expression. We therefore examined the temporospatial expression of Ablim1 from the late headfold to the 10 somite stage by WISH (using the 3'UTRa probe). Up to and including the 2 somite stage, bilaterally symmetrical expression was seen in the anterior lateral plate, contiguous with expression in the heart (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). By 3 somites expression in the LPM became clearly asymmetric, with expression in the left lateral plate being both stronger and stretching noticeably further posteriorly than in the right (Fig. (Fig.2b).2b). This asymmetric expression was highly evident at 5 somites, being particularly obvious when the WISH is developed for a short time (Fig. (Fig.2c).2c). By 7 somites, after lateral plate Nodal expression has ceased, asymmetric left lateral plate expression of Ablim1 was strongly downregulated, although still evident at a low level in some embryos (Fig. (Fig.2d).2d). By 8 somites, no sign of asymmetric lateral plate expression was evident (Fig. (Fig.2e).2e). Analysis of sections revealed that lateral plate expression was present throughout the lateral plate mesoderm (Fig. 2f, g) similar to Nodal. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that Nodal activates Ablim1. As with our previous results, expression of Ablim1 in the node was apparent when the WISH colour development was left for longer periods of time (Fig. 1h, l, ,2b2b).
To further test the hypothesis that Nodal activates asymmetric Ablim1 expression, Ablim1 lateral plate expression was analysed in mutants with abnormal L-R patterning. Dnahc11 encodes a dynein heavy chain required for nodal cilia motility: the point mutant Dnahc11iv (iv) results in immotile nodal cilia, absence of nodal flow, and randomisation of both situs and Nodal lateral plate expression [15-18]. When Ablim1 lateral plate expression was analysed in iv mutants, a mixture of expression patterns were seen (Table (Table1),1), similar to those previously reported for Nodal in the iv mutant , including left-sided (Fig. (Fig.3a),3a), bilateral (Fig. (Fig.3b)3b) and right sided (Fig. (Fig.3c)3c) expression. These data show that Ablim1 asymmetry is downstream of nodal flow, similar to Nodal asymmetry and is consistent with Ablim1 asymmetry being downstream of Nodal. This hypothesis was further supported by analysis of Shh mutant embryos; Shh mutants do not express the Nodal antagonist Lefty1 in the midline, resulting in bilateral Nodal expression . Consistent with a role for Nodal upstream of lateral plate Ablim1 expression, bilateral Ablim1 expression was seen in Shh-/- embryos (data not shown and Table Table11).
We sought to analyse Ablim1 expression in embryos where Nodal LPM expression was strongly downregulated. Nodal contains an intronic enhancer (ASE) that is responsible for positive feedback regulation of its asymmetric expression in the left LPM. The NodalD600 allele lacks this ASE and consequently NodalD600/D600 embryos express extremely low levels of Nodal in the LPM [20,21]. This results in delayed and posteriorised activation of the Nodal target Pitx2, leading to L-R patterning defects. When Ablim1 expression was analysed in NodalD600/D600 embryos, ~50% of embryos showed asymmetric expression in left LPM (Fig. (Fig.3d;3d; Table Table1);1); the remainder were symmetrical, showing no LPM expression. However, the frequency at which no lateral plate Ablim1 expression was detected in NodalD600/D600 embryos was far higher than in wild type (Table (Table1).1). It is possible that the change in Ablim1 expression is a consequence of the delayed activation of the transcription factor Pitx2 in the NodalD600/D600 embryos. Therefore, we analyzed Ablim1 expression in Pitx2 mutants; Pitx2c is the isoform expressed asymmetrically in the left lateral plate mesoderm and Pitx2c-/- embryos show defects in L-R patterning . All 5 Pitx2c-/- embryos analysed showed wild type Ablim1 expression (Table (Table1;1; Fig. Fig.3e)3e) demonstrating that Pitx2c expression is not required for Ablim1 asymmetry.
It seemed possible that the low level of LPM Nodal expressed in NodalD600/D600 embryos is borderline for activating asymmetric expression of Ablim1 in the left LPM and therefore leads to stochastic activation of the locus. To determine whether the 50% of NodalD600/D600 embryos that expressed asymmetric LPM Ablim1 resulted from low level Nodal expression, we analysed lateral plate Ablim1 expression in NodalΔnode/- embryos. The NodalΔnode allele lacks the enhancer that drives Nodal expression in the node . NodalΔnode/- embryos have no, or occassionally a minimal ammount of Nodal expression at the node and no detectable Nodal, Lefty2 or Pitx2 in the LPM . When Ablim1 expression was analysed in NodalΔnode/- mutant embryos, of 25 analysed, 6 (24%) showed clear asymmetric left LPM expression (Table (Table1,1, Fig. Fig.3g).3g). The remaining 19 (76%) showed no LPM Ablim1 expression on either the right or left sides (Table (Table1,1, Fig. Fig.3f).3f). These data clearly demonstrate that Ablim1 can be asymmetrically expressed in the LPM in the absence of detectable LPM Nodal signalling and therefore suggests that this asymmetric expression is regulated by signalling cues that are independent of the Nodal cascade. The reduced frequency of asymmetric Ablim1 expression in NodalΔnode/- embryos, however, suggests a role for Nodal in the robustness of Ablim1 lateral plate asymmetry. When we re-analysed these data with respect to the stage of development (Table (Table2),2), we saw no asymmetric LPM Ablim1 expression before 4 somites. Approximately 30% of 4-5 somite embryos showed asymmetric LPM Ablim1 expression. This increased to 50% when the 6-7 somite embryos were analysed. Together these data demonstrate that detectable LPM Nodal is required for early asymmetric left LPM Ablim1 expression, but, that in its absence a second asymmetric system can activate Ablim1 asymmetry.
In the lateral plate, Nodal's auto-activation of its own expression, as well as its activation of Lefty2 and Pitx2 expression, is mediated by binding of FoxH1 to asymmetric elements (ASEs). ASEs contain two or three FoxH1 binding sites (TGT G/T T/G ATT) within a 30-200 bp region. The random frequency of a pair of binding sites within such a region is once every 350 kb. When ASE-like sequences were sought around the mouse and human Ablim1 loci, 7 sequences were identified in mouse and 3 in humans (see Additional file 2), although position and overall sequence was not conserved. To address whether Nodal might be interacting with Ablim1 through these elements, the sequences plus 100 bp on either side were PCR amplified and cloned into luciferase reporter vectors. These were transfected into HepG2 cells together with FoxH1 and a constitutively active Alk4 construct. While a control fragment from the mouse Pitx2 ASE activated luciferase, as previously reported , all the Ablim1 derived fragments failed to activate expression above background levels, arguing that Nodal does not activate Ablim1 through FoxH1 binding to an ASE (data not shown).
When temporospatial Ablim1 expression was analysed in the node, utilising the Ex2-6 probe, transcript was detected from when the node is first patent (Fig. 4a, b). Intriguingly, this first expression is of a salt and pepper pattern stretching across the pit of the node. This resolved to give a ring surrounding the node by the mid-headfold stage (Fig. (Fig.4c);4c); the first indication of asymmetry was evident at this stage, with a higher level of expression on the right than the left hand side of the node (Fig. (Fig.4c).4c). During the next few hours of development, expression on the anterior left side of the node was lost, while expression was activated in the midline cells anterior to the node, resulting in a question mark-like expression pattern (Fig. (Fig.4d).4d). By 4 somites, the remaining left-sided expression was lost, resulting in solely right-sided expression at the node (Fig. (Fig.4e).4e). This abrogation of expression continued in a clockwise direction around the node (Fig. (Fig.4f),4f), until by 7 somites peri-nodal expression was restricted to midline cells anterior to the node (Fig. (Fig.4g).4g). By 8 somites midline expression has also been lost (Fig. (Fig.4h).4h). Sections through these embryos reveal that expression in the node is restricted to the ventral layer (Fig. (Fig.4i4i).
The early dynamic expression pattern of Ablim1 in the node correlates with the changes in nodal cilia motility and nodal flow described by Okada . The loss of Ablim1 expression from the pit corresponds to the stage when local vortices form, while the loss of expression from the left side of the node correlates with the establishment of a strong leftwards flow. In conjunction with the very early asymmetry of Ablim1, this suggests that expression may be responding directly to nodal flow. To test this hypothesis we next examined Ablim1 node expression in iv mutants, where there is no nodal flow. Of 40 mutant embryos analysed, no asymmetry was detected at any stage of development. Indeed, the robust peri-nodal ring of expression was never detected. There was, however, a rise in the number of embryos where expression was not detected, from 12% in wt to 42% in iv/iv mutants (Table (Table3).3). Intriguingly, in the 58% of embryos where expression was detected, the pattern of expression was the same patchy expression seen in the very earliest wild type nodes (Fig. (Fig.5a).5a). This pattern was maintained well through the period that leftwards laminar flow is normally detected and that strong asymmetry of Ablim1 is normally seen at the node. These data demonstrate that nodal flow is required for the upregulation of Ablim1 expression in the peri-nodal region and is involved in downregulation of Ablim1 expression in the pit of the node.
The two cilia hypothesis argues that nodal flow is directly detected by nodal cilia, through the activity of Pkd2 , resulting in a left-sided Ca2+ signal. To test whether Ablim1 may be responding to these asymmetric Ca2+ signals, we analysed expression in Pkd2 mutants. Surprisingly, very similar result were obtained to those for the iv mutant. From 9 mutants analysed, 4 (44%) showed no detectable expression, while 5 showed the same patchy expression we detected in the embryos lacking nodal flow (Fig. (Fig.5b).5b). Once again, no L-R asymmetry was detectable. Together, these data demonstrate a requirement for both nodal flow and Pkd2 within the pit of the node for the loss of Ablim1 expression as well as for the establishment of asymmetric expression surrounding the node.
In this paper we describe the novel L-R asymmetric expression pattern of Ablim1, a gene that can be expressed independently of detectable Nodal in the left lateral plate mesoderm. A separate asymmetric expression domain in the embryonic node reveals both that Ablim1 expression is the earliest known marker of mammalian L-R asymmetry, and that flow (most likely mediated through Pkd2-dependent Ca2+ signalling) is directly affecting gene expression in the node, prior to any effects on asymmetry.
Work from many research groups over the past decade has established a generally accepted pathway underlying establishment of L-R patterning in mammals (reviewed ). The activation of the Nodal signalling cascade in the left LPM results in asymmetric, left-sided, expression of Pitx2 that is maintained into organogenesis (Fig. (Fig.6).6). In light of misexpression experiments in chick and Xenopus, Pitx2 has been argued to specify left sidedness [11,12]. Yet, while Pitx2 mutant mouse embryos demonstrate right pulmonary and atrial isomerism [25-28], the initial direction of embryonic turning and heart looping are Pitx2-independent . In contrast, analysis of mice lacking or unable to respond to Nodal signalling in the lateral plate showed a randomised direction of heart looping [23,29]; the direction of embryonic turning was also randomised in Cryptic (MGI: Cfc1) mutants, but not reported for the Nodal mutants [23,29]. These data argue that heart looping and embryonic turning are controlled by Nodal expression, however, it is not possible to distinguish the role of Nodal at the node from its role in the lateral plate in these experiments. Our results clearly show Ablim1 asymmetry is independent of Pitx2 expression. More significantly, Ablim1 is capable of being asymmetrically expressed in the absence of detectable LPM Nodal signalling. Quite clearly, another L-R asymmetric signal is present in the embryo, that for the sake of discussion we shall refer to as "signal X".
While it is clear from our analysis that Ablim1 can be asymmetrically expressed in the absence of detectable Nodal and Pitx2, asymmetric Nodal obviously does play a role. The strong reduction of lateral plate Nodal expression in NodalD600/D600 embryos results in ~50% of embryos with detectable asymmetric LPM Ablim1 expression, while the total removal of LPM Nodal expression in the NodalΔnode/- embryos reduces this level to 24% (Table (Table1).1). The level of LPM Nodal expression therefore directly affects asymmetric Ablim1 expression. This relationship is underlined when the temporal activation of Ablim1 is analysed; strong reduction of Nodal signalling is known to result in delayed target gene activation . At early somite stages no Nodal-independent Ablim1 expression is seen, compared to expression in 30% of embryos by 4-5 somites and 50% by 6-7 somites (Table (Table2).2). It is therefore clear that two signals, a Nodal-dependent and the Nodal-independent "signal X" influence asymmetric lateral plate Ablim1 (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). While we have drawn "signal X" and Nodal both directly acting on Ablim1, we cannot rule out the possibility that "signal X" is in part regulated by Nodal. It is also possible that there is a temporal offset between Nodal signalling and "signal X", with Nodal acting first. The data neither argue for nor against these scenarios and in the absence of identifying and interfering with "signal X" it is impossible to distinguish between them.
A signal acting on the left side of the embryo may reflect either a left-sided activator or a right sided repressor of Ablim1 expression. Work from various groups has revealed additional lateral plate asymmetries in gene expression. BMP signalling, as assessed by Smad1 phosphorylation, is L-R asymmetric and this asymmetry is driven by asymmetric expression of the BMP antagonists chordin and noggin, which in turn are controlled by Nodal . Therefore, it seems unlikely that BMP signalling lies upstream of Ablim1 asymmetry. Similarly, the Nkx3-2 (or BapX1) homeodomain locus shows right sided asymmetric expression, but again is thought to act downstream of Nodal . In contrast, little is known about control of the right sided transcription factor Snail (Snai1), which temporally mirrors Nodal . Conditional deletion leads to randomised embryonic turning and heart looping and bilateral activation of the Nodal signalling cascade, arguing that it normally inhibits right sided Nodal expression. It is therefore possible that Snai1 inhibits Ablim1 expression on the right side of the embryo. Indeed the role of the snail family of genes as transcriptional repressors is well documented . A formal possibility exists that "signal X" in fact represents a very low level Nodal signal, below that capable of activating the known LPM targets of Nodal. While no Nodal expression is detected in the LPM, low level ectopic Nodal expression was reported in a few cells in the pit of the node in a small proportion of NodalΔnode/- embryos . Such a localised signal would be expected to first activate expression close to the node, in a manner similar to that reported for initial Nodal activation [discussed in . No such localised expression was evident for Ablim1 in NodalΔnode/- embryos (Fig. (Fig.3g3g and data not shown). Indeed, such putative low level Nodal signalling falls outside of the known activity of Nodal and it too would arguably constitue a novel asymmetric signal.
Wild type Ablim1 expression in the node changes markedly at the mid-late headfold stage, from a low level broad pan-node expression to a robust peri-nodal ring (Fig. (Fig.4).4). This reflects two changes; upregulation in the crown cells surrounding the node and downregulation within the pit of the node. Developmentally this corresponds to when nodal cilia are driving vortical fluid motion , suggesting that cilia driven fluid flow plays a role in these expression changes. This is supported by the failure of iv and Pkd2 mutant embryos to express the peri-nodal ring of Ablim1 expression (Table (Table3).3). Moreover, almost 60% of these embryos maintain the same low level pan-node expression seen in early wild type embryos. We detected no expression in nodes of the remaining mutant embryos and argue that this reflects either failure to maintain low level pan-node expression over time and/or technical limitations in detecting low level gene expression by WISH. The role of nodal cilia motility in generating nodal flow and L-R asymmetry is so central to thinking that little consideration has been given to any earlier role for fluid flow. Our data, however, reveals an early and previously unrecognised function for nodal flow in modulating symmetrical gene expression within the node, separate from the role of nodal flow in L-R determination.
The first L-R asymmetry in Ablim1 expression is evident in the node by the late headfold stage (Fig. (Fig.4c),4c), several hours before the 1-2 somite stage at which asymmetry is evident for the other known asymmetric loci Nodal, Cerl2 (MGI: Dand5) and Lplunc1 [14,15,34-36]. This argues that Ablim1 is responding to very early asymmetric signals. Nodal flow is argued to be the initial asymmetric signal in the mouse (reviewed ) and is clearly driving fluid flow leftwards by early somite stages . However, the first Ablim1 asymmetry is evident at a stage when beads introduced into a node in vitro are carried leftwards only inefficiently and on average, hopping from vortex to vortex . Whether such an inefficient flow could affect sensory cilia sufficiently to fulfil the requirements of the two cilia hypothesis is unclear. Presumably NVPs could be carried leftwards in a similar manner to the beads, although whether they would break efficiently in such a flow is uncertain.
By the early somite stages a completely novel and very distinctive asymmetry of Ablim1 expression becomes evident at the node. The peri-nodal ring "retreats" around the node in a clockwise direction between 3 and 7 somites. This asymmetry of expression is very different from that seen for other asymmetrically expressed loci at the node; these show bi-lateral expression flanking the node, with stronger expression on one side than the other.
While the control of Ablim1 node asymmetry is not addressed by this study, the speed of the changes in Ablim1 expression suggests that this is an active process. In chick an anti-clockwise migration of cells around the node underlies gene asymmetry [37,38]. However, in mice, cre-loxP based lineage analyses of both node crown and pit cells did not reveal such cell migration [23,39]. The role of flow in controlling earlier changes in Ablim1 expression makes flow a mechanism we must contemplate. Yet for flow to control Ablim1 asymmetry, the following objections must be taken into account. (1) How could leftwards flow initially affect just the anterior node? At early somite stages the anterior node is shallower than the posterior [40,41] and this may influence the ability of flow to impact on the crown cells in the anterior versus the posterior. (2) How does flow subsequently affect the posterior node? As the embryo grows the node remodels, becoming more even in depth between anterior and posterior. At the same time leftwards flow becomes laminar. A combination of these two events may then allow flow to also affect posterior left-sided node crown cells. (3) How does flow subsequently affect the right side of the node? In vivo, fluid flow within the node recycles being drawn downwards on the right hand side . A combination of growth, node remodelling and perhaps temporal accumulation of signalling may allow the right side of the node to respond to the recycled flow as it is pulled back into the right hand side of the node (Fig. (Fig.6B6B).
While there is strong evidence for nodal flow in many vertebrates [43-45], earlier, pre-flow events have been demonstrated to influence L-R patterning in non-mammalian species. Vg1 can influence situs determination and its putative co-receptor, Syndecan-2, becomes asymmetrically phosphorylated in pre-flow Xenopus embryos [46-49]. Pharmacolgical experiments have implictaed H+K+ATPase, VATPase, Serotonin and 14-3-3 family member E in Xenopus situs determination [50-52]. In the resulting serotonin model, an electric field drives serotonin through gap junctions in Xenopus, resulting in higher right than left sided localisation [52-54]. The H+K+ATPase mRNA similarly becomes asymmetrically localised in Xenopus and perturbed expression disrupts L-R patterning in both Xenopus and chick . Therefore the question must be raised as to whether such early mechanisms also exist in mammals and may be controlling Ablim1 asymmetry, either at the node or in the LPM.
That there is asymmetry of Ablim1 expression at both the node and the LPM bears comparison to the expression pattern of Nodal. Nodal asymmetry at the node slightly predates that in the LPM and is required for LPM expression in the mouse . It has even been argued, in light of the ability of Nodal to autoactivate, that Nodal at the node might be carried to left LPM to activate expression there . In striking contrast, Ablim1 asymmetry is on opposite sides in the node and LPM. So while there is Ablim1 asymmetry at the node when LPM asymmetry is first detected, the expression domains are on opposite sides of the embryo (Fig. (Fig.1g).1g). Moreover, while Nodal is a signalling molecule, Ablim1 is a structural, cell autonomously acting protein. It is difficult to envisage how a cytoskeletal protein would be acting to repress its own expression across many cell diameters. More likely, the two expression domains are independently regulated. Indeed, the long isoform of the protein seen at the node but not detected in the LPM originates at an alternate first exon, consistent with different promoter enhancer combinations controlling the two expression domains.
Uniquely, for mammalian asymmetric genes, Ablim1 encodes a structural protein. As its name suggests, Ablim1 protein binds to actin and when first identified, the presence of lim domains led the authors to suggest that it might act as an adaptor protein, bringing other proteins to the actin cytoskeleton . The homologue in C. elegans, unc-115, similarly binds actin , and when mutated leads to an uncoordinated phenotype and defects in axon guidance . Expression of a dominant negative Ablim1 in chick embryos leads to similar axonal phenotypes . Yang and Lundquist  further demonstrated that expression of unc-115 in mammalian fibroblasts led to the formation of peripheral actin conglomerations at the expense of stress fibres. One possible explanation that they suggest is that Ablim1 protein may have different roles at the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm, acting to abrogate stress fibre formation when cytoplasmic. This raises the possibility that asymmetric Ablim1 expression might prove permissive for asymmetric morphogenetic changes in the embryo. However, when an isoform specific deletion of Ablim1 was made, for the isoform seen in the eye, no defects were reported . This deletion, however, seems unlikely to affect the expression that we have described. Indeed many additional alternative first exons are now annotated that were not evident to Lu and colleagues.
We have identified Ablim1 as a L-R asymmetrically expressed LPM gene that also shows a highly novel asymmetric expression pattern in the node. Through study of Ablim1, we provide definitive evidence that in addition to the recognised Nodal-Pitx2 asymmetric pathway in the left LPM, a second LPM Nodal-independent pathway must exist.
In the node we reveal a previously unrealised role for flow and Pkd2 in the control of early symmetrical Ablim1 expression within the node. This provides a novel, expression based readout of nodal flow. It seems reasonable to speculate that other genes expressed within the node may also be modulated by fluid flow.
Ablim1 expression within the early node becomes asymmetric at the head fold stage, several hours previous to other asymmetrically expressed loci. This is the earliest marker of L-R asymmetry in the mouse. Subsequent asymmetric node expression proceeds in an entirely novel pattern, retreating around the node. While we do not understand how this is controlled, future study of this seems likely to shed light on the mechanisms of L-R patterning.
Ablim1 is a candidate for processes controlling L-R morphogenesis and identity and future study of mutants will reveal it role in L-R patterning.
To collect staged embryos, mating was assessed by monitoring for copulation plugs. The day of plug was designated day 0.5. Wild type embryos were (C3H/HeH × 101/H)F1s. Mutant lines were: iv- Dnahc11iv [61,62]; Pkd2lrm4 ; NodalD600, Nodaltm2Rob ; Nodal- is the Nodal-LacZ allele Nodaltm1Rob ; NodalΔnode is the Nodal node del, Nodaltm3Rob ; Pitx2c null, Pitx2tm3.1Jfm ; Shh, Shhtm1Chg .
All animals were used in accordance with UK Home Office regulations.
Tissue for micro-array analysis was dissected in cooled PBS, then snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was produced by Qiagen RNeasy mini kit and quality assessed by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Reverse transcription and amplification were conducted according to the SMART mRNA Amplification Kit (Clontech). The resulting samples were labelled with Cy3 and Cy5 and used to hybridise MRC Mouse Known Gene Oligo Array printed array slides (Mm_SGC_Av2), identifying 7455 known genes, according to standard protocols. Results from 4 experimental repeats were analysed using GeneSpring (Agilent Technologies). Genes were ranked for differences in left versus right sided expression. The data from these experiments has been submitted to ArrayExpress, reference E-MEXP-2277.
The following IMAGE clones (IC) were used to produce anti-sense WISH probes: IC1-3995027 Oaz1, IC2-4457726 Agtrl1, IC3-4935411 Ablim1, IC4-5042041 Tssc3, IC5-5123607 F10, IC6-5291579 Fkbpla, IC7-5329923 Cts1, IC8-5716506 Plk, IC9-6335891 Hmgi, IC10-6390454 Aqp3, IC11-3963483 Tpm1, IC12-5715646 tuba1, IC13-5685601 Hyal1.
IC3 represents a full length Ablim1 clone. Clones portions of Ablim1 sequence, exons 2-6, 8-25 and 3'UTR sequences, were produced by restriction digest or PCR amplification and cloned into pBluescript2. Antisense RNA probes were produced and used for wholemount in situ hybridisation, according to standard protocols.
Putative ASE sequences were amplified by PCR from BALB/c mouse and commercial human DNA, TA cloned into pGL3-Promoter vector (Promega). The sequence cloned into pGL3 was confirmed by sequencing. Luciferase assays were carried out as previously described .
ASE: asymmetric element; EST: expressed sequence tag; LPM: Lateral plate mesoderm; L-R: Left-Right; UTR: untranslated region; VHP: villin headpiece; WISH: wholemount in situ hybridisation.
JS carried out the majority of dissections, genotyping and molecular genetic analysis. AE carried out additional practical work and contributed to experimental design. HH and PU performed and analysed the microarray experiment. JB and SB planned and performed the luciferase analysis. NB provided genotyped mutant embryos for analysis. DN conceived, designed and supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
L-R micro array data. The top asymmetric expressing genes as indicated by the micro-array analysis. Data from 4 experiments has been averaged and genes ranked for stronger left (top) or right (bottom) sided expression. Genes subsequently analysed by in situ are highlighted.
ASE containing sequences around Ablim1. Sequences containing two or more FoxH1 binding sites (TGT G/T T/G ATT) within a 30-200 bp region, in and surrounding the mouse and human Ablim1 loci.
We would like to thank Aimee Ryan for discussion of the data and critical reading of the manuscript. Debbie Williams for submitting the microarray data to ArrayExpress. Jenny Murdoch, Andy Greenfield, Paraskevi Goggolidou and members of the laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript. NB is funded by BHF Programme Grant RG/03/012. DN is funded by the UK MRC. SB is funded by the Wellcome Trust and BHF.