Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of spsJournal HomeThiemeInstructions for AuthorsSubscribeAboutEditorial Board
Semin Plast Surg. 2009 February; 23(1): 40–47.
PMCID: PMC2884893
Aesthetic Surgery in Asians
Guest Editors Yu-Ray Chen M.D. Léonard Bergeron M.D., C.M., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.(C)

The Asian Face Lift

Léonard Bergeron, M.D., C.M., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.(C)1 and Yu-Ray Chen, M.D.1


The face-lift procedure (rhytidectomy) is increasingly popular in Asia. There is extensive literature on different techniques in Western patients. Cultural and anthropomorphologic differences between Asian and Caucasians require the adaptation of current techniques to obtain a satisfactory outcome for both the patient and the surgeon. This article therefore attempts to define important differences between Asians and Caucasians in terms of signs of facial aging, perception of beauty, and surgical goals. Our face-lift technique, a modified deep-plane face lift for Asians, is detailed and cases are presented.

Keywords: Asian, Oriental, aesthetic surgery, face lift, rhytidectomy, modified deep-plane face lift

Facial rejuvenation surgery is increasingly popular in Asia. Whereas there is extensive literature about Oriental blepharoplasty procedures,1,2,3 discussions pertaining to the particularities of Asian face lifts have been scarce.4,5,6,7,8 Specific cultural and anthropomorphologic differences require a different approach to restore facial youthfulness and attractiveness. This article attempts to define important differences between Asians and Caucasians in terms of signs of facial aging, perception of beauty, and surgical goals. Our face-lift technique, a modified deep-plane face lift for Asians, is detailed and cases are presented.


Current face-lift techniques must be adapted to the Asian population. Signs of facial aging in Asians are often different than in Caucasians (Table 1). Skin thickness and quality remains fairly good with aging. Rhytides and skin laxity are less present than in Caucasians, lessening the need to redrape and excise excessive skin. Rejuvenation procedures must therefore focus more on subcutaneous tissue repositioning, which often involves variants of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and deep-plane face lifts. Furthermore, concepts of beauty and youthfulness are different. The outcome of surgery must therefore be adapted. This section discusses the Asian perception of beauty, perception of facial aging, and technical points to take into account when performing a face lift on an Asian patient.

Table 1
Facial Aging Signs in Asians

Asian Perception of Beauty

Because of the subjective nature of beauty, it is particularly difficult to provide a single description of a beautiful Asian face. Different regions of Asia have different tastes regarding the matter.9 There are, however, some facial characteristics that are generally regarded as favorable: large bright eyes, some degree of nasal dorsum and tip projection, an oval facial shape, and a smooth mandibular outline. A square jaw with prominent mandibular angles and high cheek bones are generally considered as unfavorable traits10 as they are perceived as harsh and severe.

Frequent Complaints and Treatment Expectations

Although complaints of patients about signs of aging are the same (nasolabial folds, marionette line, jowling, loss of mandibular definition, platysmal banding, etc.), their expectations from surgery are often quite different. In contrast with Caucasians, more emphasis is placed on correction of the nasolabial fold, and less on aggressive neck correction. The mandibular line and jowls are also important to treat, but the end point is different. There should be a smooth oval facial outline with moderate correction of neck laxity instead of a sharp, more angular mandibular contour with a perfectly tightened neck. Neck dissection is therefore often much less extensive. Dissection 2 to 4 cm below the mandible and submental liposuction are often the only procedure required. This limited neck dissection often spares the need for the retroauricular incision of classic rhytidectomies. Platysmal banding, when present, is expected to be treated the same way as in Caucasians.

Difference in Techniques

Subcutaneous, “mini” face lifts (S-lift,11 minimal access cranial suspension [MACS],12 and others6), SMAS, deep-plane13,14 and subperiosteal face lifts5,8,15 can all be performed safely in Asians. There are, however, a few technical points that must be taken into account (Table 2). Planes of dissection are similar, but the extent of dissection differs. A wide neck undermining is less frequent than that in Caucasians. The nasolabial folds are very important to address during surgery. The modified deep-plane technique presented later is particularly well suited to address this concern. Because skin laxity is often minimal compared with that in Caucasians, more emphasis must be made on repositioning the SMAS adequately to achieve facial rejuvenation. By corollary, a skin-only face lift will likely not address the problem and produce unfavorable results. Restoring a smooth mandibular outline is important, but angularity and excessive definition is not considered attractive.

Table 2
Important Points Concerning the Asian Face Lift


This section introduces the modified deep-plane face lift for Asians. It addresses the nasolabial fold, restores cheek fullness, and smooths the mandibular line. Preserving the masseteric ligaments prevents Bichat's fat herniation, which would give an unfavorable definition of the zygomas in Asians. Figure Figure11 introduces the facial ligaments that need to be addressed during the modified deep-plane technique presented.

Figure 1
Ligaments, septum, and adhesions relevant to the modified deep-plane face lift. Temporal and periorbital area: superior temporal septum, inferior temporal septum, temporal ligamentous adhesion (TLA), supraorbital ligamentous adhesion ...


As with other face-lift procedures, the typical patient is in his or her fifties and presents nasolabial fold deepening, jowling, loss of mandibular line, submental lipodystrophy, and neck laxity. A more aggressive neck dissection and redraping is usually performed when platysmal band are present. Brow ptosis and frontal rhytides are indications to perform a concomitant bicoronal forehead lift with corrugator resection.


Figure Figure22 illustrates the incisions used. A slightly curved temporal incision is used and is extended superiorly to allow later repositioning of the lateral eyebrow. If a concomitant forehead lift is performed, the bilateral temporal incisions are joined superiorly to perform a formal bicoronal incision. Anterior to the ear, a retro-tragal incision is preferred. Inferiorly, the incision often ends a few millimeters behind the lobule tip. If an extensive neck redraping is planned, the incision can be extended close to the concho-mastoid groove, on the mastoid skin and into the hair-bearing scalp.

Figure 2
Skin incision and extent of subcutaneous dissection. The temporal incision is hidden behind the hairline. A retro-tragal incision is performed. The retro-auricular incision is extended superiorly as necessary. The subcutaneous dissection (light ...

Extent of Subcutaneous Dissection

Figure Figure22 illustrates the typical extent of the subcutaneous dissection. Superiorly, the dissection extends 1 cm above the zygomatic arch. Inferiorly, the dissection extends a few centimeters below the mandibular angle. Anteriorly, the dissection stops roughly at a “vertical line” dropped from the lateral orbital rim, where the orbicularis muscle fibers are seen.

Extent of Subgaleal Dissection

In the temporal area, a subgaleal dissection is carried superior to the zygomatic arch. The undermining is performed anteriorly to the lateral eyebrow. To mobilize the lateral eyebrow (Fig. 1), one needs to release the superior temporal septum, inferior temporal septum, temporal ligamentous adhesion, lateral brow thickening, and lateral orbital thickening of the periorbital septum.16

If forehead rhytides and brow ptosis are present, a formal bicoronal forehead lift is performed. The supraorbital ligamentous adhesion is released as well. Partial corrugator resection is performed. A monopolar cautery with a Colorado-type needle is used to score the undersurface of the frontalis. One needs to identify by transparency from the undersurface of the frontalis the two supraorbital nerves. Scoring of the frontalis is made with transverse cautery lines in between the two nerves, stopping ~1 cm from each nerve to avoid forehead anesthesia.

Extent of Sub-SMAS Dissection and “Deep-Plane” Dissection

Figure Figure33 illustrates the extent of the sub-SMAS dissection. To facilitate the exposure for the following dissection, it is suggested to ligate and divide the superficial artery and vein. Releasing 1.5 to 2 cm of the superficial temporal fascia, which now separates the upper subgaleal dissection from the lower subcutaneous dissection, will allow the skin flap to be reclined anteriorly.

Figure 3
Modified deep-plane dissection. The SMAS is incised along the dotted line. The shaded area is the zone that is undermined. The superior dissection starts under the SMAS in the cheek area. It proceeds superiorly and anteriorly until the lateral border ...

The SMAS is incised below the zygomatic arch, 1.5 to 2 cm anterior to the ear. The dissection proceeds anteriorly, between the SMAS and the parotid fascia. It stops at the masseteric ligaments, which are preserved. Releasing these cutaneous ligaments and dissecting further will likely cause Bichat's fat to herniate, complicate the procedure, and give too much definition to the zygomas.

Inferiorly, the dissection extends anteriorly along the mandibular border, deep to the platysma. Once the mandibular cutaneous ligaments are visualized, they are released. Liposuction of the submental area can be performed at this time if required.

Superiorly, the sub-SMAS dissection is continued until the lateral border of the zygomaticus major is seen, at its confluence with the orbicularis muscle fibers. At this point, the dissection plane changes to a more superficial plane, following the surface of the zygomaticus major. This plane change is necessary to prevent injury to the facial nerve branch to the zygomaticus major muscle, which enters the muscle belly from its undersurface. The dissection proceeds until the zygomaticus minor is seen. The tip of the scissors are used to bluntly free the nasolabial fold. At this point, it is critical to adequately free the zygomatic ligament (see Fig. Fig.1)1) from the SMAS. An adequately released SMAS will move freely upon traction and provide a smooth cheek contour, without skin dimpling or irregular waving at the nasolabial fold.

Repositioning the Tissues

Pulling on the mobilized SMAS in a superolateral direction will allow smoothing of the nasolabial fold as well as reposition cheek soft-tissues. Fibrin glue is applied. The SMAS is then anchored to the zygomatic arch with 3-0 PDS sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Traction on the lower part of the SMAS is used to smoothen the mandibular border. The SMAS/platysma flap is sutured to the mastoid area. Excessive skin in the cheek area is resected. Note that skin resection is often very minimal compared with that in Caucasians. Fibrin glue is applied in the subcutaneous plane, and final skin closure is performed.

Particular attention is paid to the tragal and lobule area. The tragal skin flap is thinned. A deep suture is then used to re-create the pre-tragal sulcus. The retro-tragal incision is then closed normally. When closing the skin incisions around the earlobe, no tension should be placed on it to prevent the pixie ear deformity.

In the temporal area, the scalp is pulled to reposition the lateral brow in the desired position. Excessive scalp is trimmed, and skin closure is performed with subcutaneous sutures and staples.


Figures Figures44 and and55 illustrate a female and a male Asian face lift, respectively. In both cases, note the improvement of nasolabial folds, restoration of cheek fullness, and the smoothing of the mandibular line, which restores the desired oval facial shape.

Figure 4
Asian female face lift. Combined face lift and forehead lift. (A, B) Preoperative; (C, D) postoperative. Note the improvement of the nasolabial folds. The mandibular line is smoothed without excessive definition. An attractive, ...
Figure 5
Asian male face lift. Face lift and lower eyelid blepharoplasty. (A, B) Preoperative; (C, D) postoperative. Nasolabial folds are improved, cheek fullness is restored, and a smooth, youthful mandibular outline is obtained. ...

Postoperative Course

Antibiotics are given at induction time, as well as for 3 days postoperatively. Sutures are removed at 5 days, and scalp staples are removed at 2 weeks. Cold packs are applied for 15 minutes every hour while awake during the first 48 hours. Warm packs are then applied three times daily for 2 weeks. Patients are instructed to refrain from performing activities that can increase blood pressure or increase blood flow to the face for 2 weeks. Social activities can be resumed at soonest at 1 week. The final result is obtained at 3 to 6 months postoperatively when most of the healing process has occurred.


As with other face-lift techniques, possible complications can include wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, facial nerve palsy, and asymmetries. Tragal deformation, lobule lengthening, and hypertrophic scars are also possible unfavorable outcomes. The rate of complications, however, is similar to that of other techniques, with the exception of hypertrophic scarring, which is believed to occur more often in the Asian population.

The fibrin glue is used to reduce both the postoperative hematoma rate and the extent of swelling.17 The avoidance of drains is both comfortable for the patient and convenient for the surgeon.


The Asian face lift requires an adaptation of current techniques to achieve the desired aesthetic outcome. Cultural differences and differences in anthropomorphologic features alter the patient's vision of beauty and youthfulness. The modified deep-plane face-lift technique presented in this article is particularly well suited for Asian patients. The less aggressive neck dissection provides a smooth mandibular line without excessive definition. Sparing of the masseteric ligaments prevents Bichat's fat herniation, prevents undesirable zygoma overdefinition, and restores cheek fullness to provide a smooth face. However, one should not assume that all Asians have a similar concept of beauty. Patients from different regions of Asia have subtle aesthetic taste differences, and immigrants to other continents might be greatly influenced by local aesthetic traits. A careful discussion with the patient to define his or her concerns as well as detailing the goals of surgery is therefore mandatory for a successful treatment.


  • Chen S H, Mardini S, Chen H C, et al. Strategies for a successful corrective Asian blepharoplasty after previously failed revisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1270–1277. discussion 1278–1279. [PubMed]
  • Watanabe K. Measurement method of upper blepharoplasty for Orientals. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17:1–8. [PubMed]
  • Kikkawa D O, Kim J W. Asian blepharoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1997;37:193–204. [PubMed]
  • Shirakabe Y, Suzuki Y, Lam S M. A new paradigm for the aging Asian face. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:397–402. [PubMed]
  • Lee Y, Hong J J. Multiplane face lift with the subperiosteal dissection for orientals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:237–244. discussion 245–236. [PubMed]
  • Onizuka T, Hosaka Y, Miyata M, Ichinose M. Our mini-facelift for Orientals. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19:49–58. [PubMed]
  • Onizuka T, Takasu K. Rhytidectomy in orientals. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1983;12(Suppl):452–455. [PubMed]
  • Kim I G, Oh J K, Baek D H. Personal experiences and algorithm of endoscopically assisted subperiosteal face lift in orientals for 5 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1768–1779. discussion 1780–1781. [PubMed]
  • Soh J, Chew M T, Wong H B. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:18–24. [PubMed]
  • Morris D E, Moaveni Z, Lo L J. Aesthetic facial skeletal contouring in the Asian patient. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34:547–556. [PubMed]
  • Saylan Z. The S-lift: less is more. Aesthetic Surg J. 1999;19:406–409.
  • Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2074–2086. [PubMed]
  • Hamra S T. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:1–13. [PubMed]
  • Hamra S T. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:53–61. discussion 62–63. [PubMed]
  • Tessier P. Subperiosteal face-lift. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34:193–197. [PubMed]
  • Moss C J, Mendelson B C, Taylor G I. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1475–1490. discussion 1491–1498. [PubMed]
  • Kamer F M, Nguyen D B. Experience with fibrin glue in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1045–1051. discussion 1052. [PubMed]

Articles from Seminars in Plastic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers