Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jbtJBT IndexAssociation Homepage
J Biomol Tech. 2010 July; 21(2): 97–102.
PMCID: PMC2884315

Optimization of Protocol for Sequencing of Difficult Templates


In this paper, we have fine-tuned a DNA sequencing protocol suitable for a wide range of difficult templates. The primary goal was to evaluate a number of parameters—such as various dye terminator mixes in the presence or absence of additives, the amount of DNA or primer, and cycling protocols—about the effectiveness of reading through complex regions. We showed that the modification of a published protocol leads to significant (75%) cost reduction without forfeiting quality of the data. In the recommended protocol, we used betaine as a standard additive, but better results can be obtained when betaine and Reagent A are mixed in an equivalent ratio.

Keywords: complex DNA regions, additives, dGTP


Although in the last 5 years, new platforms in next generation sequencing technology have become the focus for sequencing advancement, Sanger sequencing is still far from obsolete. In fact, a DNA Sequencing Research Group (DSRG) survey published in 2007 in the Journal of Biomolecular Techniques,1 consisting of data from 61 laboratories (along with personal communication, J. Kieleczawa, unpublished), indicates that as of now, the number of Sanger reactions performed in many individual core sequencing facilities is still increasing. For example, over the last 3 years, our laboratory has experienced a yearly increase of over 50% in demand for DNA sequencing services. However, the number of capillary instruments decreased dramatically, in some cases, by 90%, in almost all big sequencing centers. Once the reference sequence of an organism of interest is known, one of the next-generation platforms can now be used to sequence the same or similar species relatively quickly without relying on capillary machines. Recently, Roche released a “junior” version of its 454 platform, suited ideally for smaller, individual, next-generation sequencing projects. Coupled, for example, with Life Technology's (Foster City, CA, USA) ABI 3500, an efficient combination may be created to solve many types of sequencing projects.

In general, we believe that the Sanger technology will be viable for many years to come. A relatively straightforward and simple process to obtain good quality and long reads is invaluable for many applications (e.g., gap-closing, resequencing of individual genes), and in many cases, this technology is irreplaceable.

However, certain sequence motifs in DNA templates may interfere with long read lengths, and in these cases, the expert laboratory technician must use one of alternate protocols to yield longer reads through such regions. In our laboratory, the number of reactions requiring enhancement to the standard ABI protocol2 is 7–10%, at about 10,000–15,000 reactions/year. The protocol we use most often for many types of difficult templates is similar to one from a 2008 DSRG study,3 which uses two different big dye terminators (BDT) at a specific ratio and in the presence of a zwitterion, betaine. The DSRG study found that the use of full-strength BDT 3.1/dGTP3.0 at a ratio of 3:1 (v/v) in the presence of 1 M betaine (at a cost of $6–7/reaction) will sequence through the widest range of difficult templates.

In this study, we take a more comprehensive approach by studying 16 difficult regions (eight DNA templates, each sequenced in forward and reverse direction around the difficult region). The following variables were evaluated: different BDT 3.1:dGTP3.0 ratios at various dilution strength; various additives; amount of DNA and primers; and cycling conditions. Through optimizing ratios of BDT, using various sequencing additives and modifying cycling conditions, we were able to develop an optimal protocol costing only approximately $1.50/reaction, a savings of $4.50–5.50/reaction, resulting in total savings of $45,000–$55,000/year.


All materials and methods used in this paper were described extensively in earlier publications.39 The most difficult DNAs were obtained internally from Wyeth scientists during a normal course of submissions and selected based on a region's difficulty. The following cycling conditions were used in all experiments unless otherwise stated: Combine 150 ng DNA; 1 μl 5 μM primer; 10 mM Tris, 0.01 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 (TEsl); and additive (if used), followed by a heat-denaturation step for 5 min at 98°C. If the heat-denaturation step was omitted, it is so noted later in the text or legend. The reaction volume at this stage was set at 7 μl. The enzyme terminator mix (3 μl at different dilution strength) was then added and cycled 40 times: 96°C/10 s, 50°C/5 s, 60°C/2 min. If different cycling parameters were tested, they are indicated later in the text.

The BDT V3.1, dGTPV3.0, Sequence Enhancer Reagent A, and 5× sequence dilution buffer were from Life Technologies. The other additives that we used were betaine and DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and GC Melt (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Following cycle sequencing, unincorporated dye terminators and salts were purified using Performa Dye Terminator Removal V3 96-well plates (EdgeBioSystems, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and run on an ABI 3730 genetic analyzer using default run parameters.

For each sequencing condition, the quality read lengths (Q>20, 10) were calculated using Sequence Scanner V1.0 software (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies).


DNA Templates Used in This Study

Characteristics of difficult regions for DNAs used in this study are shown in Table 1. The descriptions were derived using Examine Repeats module in DNASeq DB LIMS developed in the DNA sequencing group at Wyeth/Pfizer.11 This module is capable of predicting up to seven different sequence motifs, which from a DNA-sequencing standpoint, may be difficult to read through.

Characteristics of Difficult Regions Used in This Study

Effect of Dye-Terminator Strength and Dye Mixes on the Ability to Sequence through Difficult Regions

The first condition that we examined was the amount (referred to in relation to 8 μl called for in the original protocol2; 8 μl undiluted BDT=1×dilution, regardless of the reaction volume) of the BDT 3.1 used alone and/or in conjunction with dGTPV3.0 mixed in different (v/v) ratios. For each difficult region, we used full-strength BDT 3.1, along with 2, 4, and 8× dilutions. When dGTPV3.0 was present, the following ratios (v/v) were tested: 4:1, 3:1, and 2:1, all at dilutions mentioned above. The dilutions were made using 5× sequence dilution buffer, and the final concentration of MgCl2 was kept at 2 mM. In total, we evaluated 16 different dye terminator ratio/dilution combinations that were used in triplicate for each difficult region.

Figure 1A–C shows that reaction conditions with 3:1 and 4:1 ratios of BDT 3.1:dGTPV3.0 in the presence of betaine resulted in the longest read length for the majority of difficult regions, and there was no significant decrease in read length when the reactions contained the full-strength 2 or 4× dye dilution. In some cases, read lengths dropped significantly at 8× dilution; hence, the rest of the tests were conducted using 4× dilutions of BigDye 3.1 and dGTPV3.0 at a 3:1 (v/v) ratio. We refer to this combination in the text as a “mix”. Table 2A (no betaine) and andBB (with betaine) summarizes all data from these experiments. Adding betaine to 1 M final concentration almost always improved read length and data quality.

Examples of Q ≥ 20 read length (RL) values for different dye dilution strengths in the presence or absence of betaine (Bet). (A) DNA #1 sequenced with forward primer. (B) DNA #5 sequenced with reverse primer. (C) DNA #6 sequenced with forward ...
Q ≥ 20 Read Length for Forward and Reverse Primers at Different Dye or Dye Mix Dilutions in the Absence of Betaine
Q ≥ 20 Read Length for Forward and Reverse Primers at Different Dye or Dye Mix Dilutions in the Presence of Betaine

Effect of Additives

To enhance further the effectiveness of the above sequencing mix, we tested various commercially available additives on the quality of reads for three most difficult regions from our DNA panel. Adding 1 μl Reagent A and 1 μl betaine to a mix produced the best quality data. Using Reagent A or GC Melt only was also effective. Routinely, however, we recommend using betaine as a result of its lower cost. Table 3 summarizes all data.

Effect of Various Additives on Q ≥ 20 Read Length for Three Most Difficult DNA Regions

Effect of the Amount of DNA and Primer

Anecdotal information heard at various meetings suggested that the amount of DNA and/or primer may have some influence on the ability to read through some difficult regions. To evaluate such a possibility, we selected three DNA templates and varied the amount of DNA from 50 to 450 ng/reaction (Fig. 2A) and then set the amount of DNA at 150 ng/reaction and varied the amount of 5 μM primer from 0.5 to 3 μl (Fig. 2B). In both cases, there was no significant effect of the amount of DNA or primer on the read length. The data for DNA #3 (R primer) were misleading and were a result of the inability of Phred to call Q ≥ 20 values accurately for difficult DNAs.3 Visual inspection of these data indicated that in each case, only 90–100 bases can be called accurately.

Effect of amount of DNA (A) or primer (B) on Q ≥ 20 read-length values. Four different templates were sequenced at three levels of DNA or primer. Template #3 was sequenced in both directions, as this is the most difficult template in this series. ...

Testing Various Cycling Conditions

Six different cycling regimes were evaluated on six different DNA templates to come up with the most efficient protocol suitable for the widest array of difficult regions. The details/descriptions of these protocols are below:

  • Protocol #1. Combine DNA, primer, additive, and TEsl. Total volume at this point was 7 μl. Heat-denature this mix for 5 min at 98°C. Cool down on ice. Add 3 μl dye terminator (or dye mix), and cycle: [(96°C/10 s) (50°C/5 s) (60°C/2 min)] × 40.4 The additive can be present during the heat-denaturation step or can be added as a part of dye mix.4 For convenience reasons, we prepared dye-additive mix and stored it at −20°C for a few weeks without loss of its effectiveness (data not shown).
  • Protocol #2. Combine all components of sequencing reactions (10 μl), and hold this mix for 1 min at 96°C. Then cycle: [(96°C/10 s) (50°C/5 s) (60°C/4 min)] × 30. This is essentially the standard ABI-like sequencing protocol.2
  • Protocol #3. Similar to Protocol #1, but the extension is set at 65°C (not 60°C).
  • Protocol #4. Similar to Protocol #1, but the extension is set at 70°C (not 60°C).
  • Protocol #5. Similar to Protocol #3, but the transition time between annealing temperature (50°C) and extension temperature (65°C) was slowed down to 30 s as opposed to a typical time of approximately 5 s.
  • Protocol #6. Similar to Protocol #4, but the transition time between annealing temperature (50°C) and extension temperature (70°C) was slowed down to 30 s as opposed to a typical time of approximately 5 s.

Figures 3A (forward primer) and B (reverse primer) show Q ≥ 20 data for all tested DNA templates. In eight of 12 cases, Protocol #1 gave reads that are slightly longer, and the visual inspection in Sequencher indicated that they have overall better quality. Only in two cases did Protocol #2 give longer reads compared with Protocol #1. For the remaining two cases, data generated using either protocol gave data of similar read length. All other protocols produced data that gave significantly shorter than Q ≥ 20 reads, with the possible exception of Protocol #5, which gave comparable read length; however, the quality of data was generally worse, as illustrated in Figure 4A and B. In addition, this protocol added approximately 20 min more time to the cycling regime, and we do not recommend using it.

Testing various cycling conditions on six different DNAs with forward (A) or reverse (B) primers.
Comparison of data quality using cycling Protocol #1 (A) or Protocol #5 (B). Note that the amount of dark-blue bases is higher (and starts earlier) in the example sequenced with Protocol #5. In Sequencher's notation, the light-blue color indicates bases ...


In this study, we have tested an extensive range of parameters to develop the most efficient yet cost-effective protocol for sequencing a wide range of difficult templates. The most optimal protocol included a mixture of BDT 3.1 and dGTPV3.0 at a v/v ratio of 3:1 and in the presence of 1 μl betaine and 1 μl Reagent A. However, taking into account the cost factor/reaction ($0.02 for betaine only and $1.01 for betaine/Reagent A mix), we recommend using betaine only.


We thank many Wyeth scientists who provided us with DNA templates with a variety of difficult regions. We also recognize our appreciation to our colleagues at the DNA Sequencing Group in Cambridge for valuable suggestions and discussions. Finally, we express our gratitude to Global Biological Technologies management for creating an environment where such studies are encouraged and possible.


1. Needleman D, Adam D, Detwiler M, et al. DNA Sequencing Research Group: 2006 General Survey of DNA Sequencing Facilities. J Biomol Tech 2007;18:113–119 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. ABI PRISM® BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit. Protocol Foster City, CA, USA: Applied Biosystems, 2002;Part number 4337035 Rev. A
3. Kieleczawa J, Adam D, Bintzler D, et al. Identification of optimal protocols for sequencing difficult templates: the results of the ABRF DSRG Difficult Template Study 2008. J Biomol Tech 2009;20:116–127 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Kieleczawa J. Sequencing of difficult DNA templates. In Kieleczawa J, editor. (ed): DNA Sequencing: Optimizing the Process and Analysis, Sudbury, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett, 2005;27–34
5. Kieleczawa J. Simple modifications of the standard DNA sequencing protocol allow for sequencing through siRNA hairpins and other repeats. J Biomol Tech 2005;16:220–223 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Kieleczawa J. Controlled heat-denaturation of DNA plasmids. In Kieleczawa J, editor. (ed): DNA Sequencing: Optimizing the Process and Analysis Sudbury, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett, 2005;1–10
7. Yie Y, Wei Z, Tien P. A simplified and reliable protocol for plasmid DNA sequencing: Fast miniprep and denaturation. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:361 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Kieleczawa J, Wu P. Prolonged storage of plasmid DNAs under different conditions: effects on plasmid integrity, spectra characteristics, and DNA sequence quality. In Kieleczawa J, editor. (ed): DNA Sequencing II: Optimizing the Preparation and Clean Up, Sudbury, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett, 2005;99–115
9. Kieleczawa J, Li T, Wu P. Preparation of difficult DNA templates using seven different commercial methods. In Kieleczawa J, editor. (ed): DNA Sequencing II: Optimizing the Preparation and Clean Up, Sudbury, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett, 2006;1–14
10. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998;8:175–185 [PubMed]
11. Kieleczawa J, Koffman D, Lakshmanan B, Kitzmiller A. Bioinformatics tools to aide sequencing of difficult templates In Kieleczawa J, editor. (ed): DNA Sequencing III: Dealing with Difficult Templates, Sudbury, MA, USA, Jones and Bartlett, 2008;163–177

Articles from Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT are provided here courtesy of The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities