1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
2. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784–92. [PubMed] 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) National Health Interview Survey. [cited 2009 Sep 25]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. 4. CDC (US) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. [cited 2009 Sep 25]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss.
5. Department of Health and Human Services (US) 2nd ed. Washington: DHHS, Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2000. Healthy People 2010: understanding and improving health.
6. Legler J, Breen N, Meissner H, Malec D, Coyne C. Predicting patterns of mammography use: a geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:929–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 7. Wells BL, Horm JW. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 1988;88:1484–9. [PubMed] 8. Andersen MR, Yasui Y, Meischke H, Kuniyuki A, Etzioni R, Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:199–207. [PubMed] 9. Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, Taplin SH, Tangka FK, Tiro JA, et al. Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer. 2007;109:2405–9. [PubMed] 10. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. Vital Health Stat 2. 2003;(130) [PubMed]
11. Elliott MR, Davis WW. Obtaining cancer risk factor prevalence estimates in small areas: combining data from two surveys. J Royal Stat Soc Ser C. 2005;54:595–609.
12. Raghunathan TE, Dawei X, Schenker N, Parsons VL, Davis WW, Dodd KW, et al. Combining information from two surveys to estimate county-level prevalence rates of cancer risk factors and screening. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102:474–86.
13. Kish L. Statistical design for research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
14. Anderson JE, Nelson DE, Wilson RW. Telephone coverage and measurement of health risk indicators from the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 1988;88:1392–5. [PubMed]
15. Frankel MR, Srinath KP, Battaglia MP, Hoaglin DC, Smith PJ, Wright RA. Proc Surv Res Methods Sec Am Stat Assoc. 2000. Using data on interruptions in telephone service to reduce nontelephone bias in a random-digit-dialing survey; pp. 647–52.
16. Frankel MR, Srinath KP, Hoaglin DC, Battaglia MP, Smith PJ, Wright RA, et al. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialing surveys. Stat Med. 2003;22:1611–26. [PubMed]
17. de Leeuw E, de Heer W. Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison. In: Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJA, editors. Survey nonresponse. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. pp. 41–54.
18. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005;69:87–98.
19. Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A, Groves RM, Presser S. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:125–48. [PubMed]
20. Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70:646–75.
21. Nelson DE, Powell-Griner E, Town M, Kovar MG. A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1335–41. [PubMed]
23. Schenker N, Gentleman JF. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2001;55:182–6.
24. Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1837–46. [PubMed] 25. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer. 2002;94:2801–12. [PubMed] 26. Dailey AB, Kasl SV, Holford TR, Calcocoressi L, Jones BA. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2293–303. [PubMed] 27. Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:260–75. [PubMed]
28. Goyder J, Warriner K, Miller S. Evaluating socio-economic status (SES) bias in survey nonresponse. J Official Stat. 2002;18:1–11.
29. Groves RM, Couper MP. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
30. Breiman L, Spector P. Submodel selection and evaluation in regression—the X-random case. Int Stat Rev. 1992;60:291–319.
32. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spielgelhalter D. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1995.
33. Lindley DV, Smith AFM. Bayesian estimates for the linear model. J Royal Stat Series B. 1972;34:1–41.
34. Fay RE, III, Herriot RA. Estimation of income from small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to Census data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:269–77.
35. Weisberg HF. The total survey error approach: a guide to the new science of survey research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
36. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML, Frankel MR. , editors. Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Recent trends in household telephone coverage in the United States. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, de Leeuw ED, Japec L, Lavrakas PJ, et al pp. 56–86.
37. Tucker C, Brick JM, Meekins B. Household telephone service and usage patterns in the United States in 2004: implications for telephone samples. Public Opin Q. 2007;71:3–22.
38. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:926–31. [PubMed]
39. Link MW, Mokdad AH. Can Web and mail survey models improve participation in an RDD-based national health surveillance? J Official Stat. 2006;22:293–312.
40. Link MW, Mokdad AH. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with Web, mail, and telephone. Epidemiology. 2005;16:701–4. [PubMed] 41. Link MW, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Osborn L, Mokdad AH. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:1019–25. [PubMed] 42. Fahimi M, Link M, Mokdad A, Schwartz DA, Levy P. Tracking chronic disease and risk behavior prevalence as survey participation declines: statistics from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and other national surveys. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 43. Groves RM, Miller PV, Cannell CF. Chapter II: differences between the telephone and personal interview data. Vital Health Stat 2. 1987;2:11–9. [PubMed]
44. Groves RM. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
45. Mickey RM, Worden JK, Vacek PM, Skelly JM, Costanza MC. Comparability of telephone and household breast cancer screening surveys with differing response rates. Epidemiology. 1994;5:462–5. [PubMed]
47. St-Pierre M, Beland Y. Mode effects in the Canadian Community Health Survey: a comparison of CAPI and CATI. Proc Surv Res Methods Sec Am Stat Assoc. 2004:4438–44.
48. Holbrook AL, Green MC, Krosnick JA. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opin Q. 2003;67:79–125.
49. Van Goor H, Rispens S. A middle class image of society. Quality and Quantity. 2004;38:35–49.
50. Rao RS, Link MW, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Giambo P, Mokdad AH. Proc Surv Res Methods Sec Am Stat Assoc. 2005. Assessing representativeness in RDD surveys: coverage and nonresponse in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; pp. 3495–501.
51. Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Link MW. Improving standard poststratification techniques for random-digit-dialing telephone surveys. Surv Res Methods. 2008;2:11–9.
52. Muthen B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1985;38:171–89.
53. Muthen B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: a note on the size of the model. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1992;45:19–30.