PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nat Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online 2010 May 9. doi:  10.1038/nm.2143
PMCID: PMC2882530
NIHMSID: NIHMS193229

ERK activation drives intestinal tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice

Abstract

TLR signaling is essential for intestinal tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice, but the mechanisms by which this protein enhances tumor growth are unknown. Here we show that the Microflora-MyD88-ERK signaling in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) promotes tumorigenesis by increasing the stability of the c-myc oncoprotein. Activation of ERK phosphorylates c-myc that prevents its ubiquitination and its subsequent proteasomal degradation. Accordingly, Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice display reduced levels of pERK and c-myc proteins in IEC, and a low incidence of IEC tumors. A MyD88-independent activation of ERK by EGF increases pERK and c-myc levels and restores the Min phenotype in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice. Administration of an ERK inhibitor suppressed intestinal tumorigenesis in EGF-treated Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- and in Apcmin/+ mice and increased their survival. Our data reveal a new facet of oncogene-environment interaction, where the microflora-induced TLR activation regulates the expression of an oncogene that leads to IEC tumor growth in a susceptible host.

Introduction

The gastro-intestinal tract is constantly exposed to a vast number of commensal bacteria and their inflammatory products. Essential to intestinal homeostasis are pattern recognition receptors (PRR) such as TLR1. Engagement of TLR with their cognate ligands in the intestinal mucosa provokes the production of pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic and growth factors that support IEC differentiation and proliferation2. In a genetically susceptible host, an on-going intestinal inflammation provokes an uncontrolled growth of IEC leading to neoplasia3,4,5. Likewise, it was proposed that signaling through TLR regulates IEC tumor development, in mice heterozygous for a mutant form of the tumor suppressor gene, adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc)6. However, the molecular mechanisms and its relationship to intestinal inflammation have not been identified. The Apcmin/+ mouse is an animal model of human familial adenomatous polyposis7. These mice develop multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min), after they lose the heterozygote wild type Apc allele and consequently die when they reach 6 months of age8.

The survival and growth of certain tumors are dependent on the continued activation of certain oncogenes. This phenomenon that was termed “oncogene addiction”, explains tumor suppression due to the inactivation of a single gene product9. The oncogene c-myc is critical for Apc-mediated tumorigenesis10,11. The genetic deletion of c-myc results in the inhibition of tumor growth 11 and as low as a two-fold reduction in c-myc expression in IEC is sufficient to inhibit tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice12-14. Here we identified that a MyD88-dependent activation of ERK in IEC is essential to drive intestinal tumor growth in Apcmin/+ mice. Consequently, the inhibition of pERK abrogates the Min phenotype in these animals.

Results

MyD88 signaling is essential for polyp growth in Apcmin/+ mice

TLRs signal mainly through either MyD88 or TRIF. To explore the potential impact of TLR signaling on IEC tumors we crossed Apcmin/+ mice to Myd88-/- or TrifLps2/Lps2 (Lps2) mice 15. The average survival was 23 weeks for Apcmin/+ mice and 28 weeks for Apcmin/+/Lps2 mice. In contrast, all of the Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice survived the 45-week study (Supp. Fig. 1A). We then determined the role of each adapter protein on tumor (polyp) formation at 20 weeks of age. Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice had fewer polyps throughout the small and large intestines compared to Apcmin/+ or Apcmin/+/Lps2 mice (Supp. Fig. 1B and Supp. Fig. 1C), but they displayed circular raised lesions (microadenomas) in both the distal small intestine (DSI) and the colon (Supp. Fig. 1C-1F).

MyD88 signaling enhances IEC proliferation and suppresses IEC apoptosis in Apcmin/+ mice

As the polyps in the Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice failed to grow (Supp. Fig. 1C), we investigated whether the deletion of Myd88 affected IEC proliferation. The proliferation and the migration rate of IEC along the crypt-villus axis, as analyzed by BrdU incorporation, were decreased as compared to those in Apcmin/+ mice (Fig. 1A). We also observed a significantly higher number of apoptotic IEC in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- (Fig. 1B) as well as increased levels of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), a substrate of caspase-316 (Fig. 1C). Taken together, these data indicate that TLR signaling via MyD88 enhances IEC proliferation and inhibits IEC apoptosis, and suggest that these two effects synergize in enhancing IEC tumor growth in the Apcmin/+ mice.

Figure 1Figure 1Figure 1
Genetic disruption of Myd88 in Apcmin/+ mice suppresses proliferation and enhances apoptosis of IEC

Myd88 signaling in IEC, but not in hematopoietic cells, controls IEC tumor growth in Apcmin/+ mice

In the intestinal mucosa, both IEC and bone marrow (BM)-derived cells have functional TLR that utilize MyD88 for signaling 17,18,19. To further identify the role of BM-derived cells in IEC tumorigensis, we generated BM chimeras: both Apcmin/+ and Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- recipients were reconstituted with BM harvested from either WT or Myd88-/- donors 20. Reconstitution of Apcmin/+ recipients with either Myd88-/- or WT BM did not significantly alter polyp count and growth in either the DSI or the colon. Similarly, the number of polyps did not significantly change in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- recipients reconstituted with WT or Myd88-/- BM (Fig. 2A). These results indicate that polyp growth in Apcmin/+ mice does not depend on TLR-MyD88 signaling in BM-derived cells and highly suggests its dependence on TLR-MyD88 activation of IEC.

Figure 2Figure 2
Myd88 signaling in hematopoietic cells is not required for tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice

To explore whether host-derived or microbial-derived TLR ligands play a role in IEC tumorigenesis, we crossed Apcmin/+ mice with Il1r1-/- or with Caspase1-/- mice, which are limited in processing IL-1 and IL-18 21. As presented in Fig. 2B, there was no significant difference in the numbers of polyps in Apcmin/+/Il1r1-/- or Apcmin/+/Caspase1-/- as compared to Apcmin/+ mice. In addition, administration of the IL-1R antagonist, Anakinra, did not affect the extent of IEC tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice (Fig. 2C). Collectively, these data strongly suggest that MyD88-dependent TLR activation by microbial ligands is responsible for IEC tumor growth in Apcmin/+ mice.

A MyD88-dependent TLR signaling upregulates c-myc in IEC

The decrease in IEC proliferation and the increase in IEC apoptosis in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice suggested the involvement of a MyD88-dependent oncogene or mitogen in IEC tumorigenesis. Since c-myc is essential for tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice 11,12,14, we tested whether MyD88 regulates the expression of c-myc. MyD88-deficiency resulted in a significant decrease in the c-myc protein level in IEC. While c-myc was expressed throughout the crypt in both the DSI and the colon of Apcmin/+ mice, its expression in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice was restricted to the base of the crypt (Fig. 3A). Immunoblotting analysis of c-myc in isolated IEC (DSI) confirmed the reduced expression of not only c-myc, but also pERK in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 3B and Supp. Fig. 2A). The decreased c-myc level in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- IEC was observed in both normal and tumor regions (Supp. Fig. 2B). However, the c-myc mRNA levels in IEC did not differ significantly between Apcmin/+ and Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 3C). Inactivation of Apc activates β–catenin, which induces transcription of c-myc. The deletion of MyD88 did not affect the β-catenin level in vivo (Fig. 3B) or Wnt3-induced activation of β-catenin in vitro (Fig. 3D). Collectively, these data indicate that MyD88 signaling affects tumorigenesis independently of the Wnt-APC-β-catenin pathway.

Figure 3Figure 3Figure 3
MyD88 regulates c-myc expression levels

A posttranslational modification of c-myc by TLR-MyD88-ERK pathway stabilizes c-myc expression

The data suggested that MyD88-mediated signaling in IEC provokes tumor growth. Since IEC express functional TLRs 18,19 and Supp. Fig. 3A, we tested whether activation of a TLR-MyD88 pathway directly induces c-myc. Indeed, activation of TLR2 enhanced the protein level of c-myc in an IEC line RKO (Apc wild type) (Fig. 4A) in a MyD88-dependent manner (Supp. Fig. 3B). TLR5 (a MyD88-dependent TLR) activation in RKO produced a similar result (Supp. Fig. 3C). Consistent with the results obtained in vivo (Fig. 3C), the level of c-myc mRNA was not affected by TLR2 triggering, while the levels of IL-8 and IκBα were increased 19 (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4Figure 4Figure 4
TLR signaling via MyD88 stabilizes c-myc protein in IEC through activation of ERK

The increase in c-myc protein level without a concomitant increase in mRNA level upon TLR stimulation, suggested that c-myc protein is subjected to post-translational modifications 22. Indeed, inhibition of proteasomal function by MG-132 enhanced the c-myc protein levels in RKO cells without affecting the mRNA level (Fig. 4B), indicating a steady state degradation of c-myc. We therefore tested whether TLR stimulation in IEC stabilizes c-myc protein. While the c-myc-ubiquitin conjugates were easily detected even in the absence of a proteasome inhibitor in RKO cells, they rapidly disappeared upon TLR2 stimulation with a concomitant increase in unconjugated c-myc protein (Fig. 4C). These data indicate that the TLR-MyD88-mediated signaling pathway stabilizes c-myc protein in IEC by inhibiting its proteasomal degradation.

MEK/ERK pathway phosphorylates c-myc on Serine 62, which stabilizes c-myc by preventing ubiquitin/proteasomal degradation 23,24,25. We examined whether Myd88-mediated activation of ERK is responsible for the stabilization of c-myc. Indeed TLR2 activation induced the phosphorylation of ERK as well as of c-myc on Serine 62 (Fig. 4A). In addition, blocking ERK activation with pharmacological inhibitors rapidly reduced c-myc level (Fig. 4D). Caco-2, another IEC line, expresses a truncated APC protein similar to that observed in Apcmin/+ mice 26. We therefore tested whether MyD88-dependent ERK activation can stabilize c-myc in these Apc mutant cells. Indeed, TLR2 stimulation increased the c-myc protein level with concomitant ERK activation and a decrease in the polyubiquitinated c-myc (Supp. Fig. 4A and B). Similarly, stimulation of either TLR2 or EGFR in a non-transformed IEC line derived from the small intestine (RIE-1) also activated ERK and c-myc (Supp. Fig. 4C). These data indicate that c-myc level in Apcmin/+ mice is maintained by two independent mechanisms, 1) a transcriptional activation of c-myc by β-catenin signaling initiated by Apc inactivation and 2) a post-translational stabilization of c-myc by MyD88-dependent ERK activation.

ERK signaling drives the Min phenotype

We tested whether a MyD88-independent activation of ERK increases c-myc protein level in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice and restores the Min phenotype. As EGF activates ERK and enhances c-myc levels in non-transformed IEC (Supp. Fig. 4C), we treated Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice with either EGF alone or with EGF plus a MEK1/2 inhibitor (PD0325901, PD). The latter is a specific and an effective pharmacological inhibitor of ERK 27 and is in phase II clinical trials. The administration of EGF significantly increased the number of polyps in the DSI (for comparison see Supp. Fig. 1B), and this induction was abrogated by PD treatment (Fig. 5A). Serum hemoglobin and body weights drop significantly in Apcmin/+ mice over time, due to the increase in numbers and the sizes of the exophytic polypoid intestinal tumors minimizing food absorption, with subsequent intestinal obstruction and intestinal bleeding 28. The inhibition of tumor growth in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/-, PD-treated animals coincided with increased serum hemoglobin levels (Fig. 5B) and increased body weight (Fig. 5C), indicating that these were healthier animals. As expected, EGF administration enhanced levels of c-myc and pERK in IEC, which was reversed by PD treatment (Fig. 5D). Taken together, the inhibition of IEC tumors in PD treated mice further validated the regulatory role of ERK on tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 3B) and could suggest that TLR-MyD88 pathway contributes significantly to ERK activation in Apcmin/+ mice, under the steady state conditions.

Figure 5Figure 5
Activation of ERK restores the Min phenotype in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice

These results indicated a pivotal role for ERK activation in the Min phenotype. We therefore tested its tumorigenic role in 10-week old Apcmin/+ mice. PD treatment for 14 weeks of these animals resulted in complete inhibition of polyp growth (Fig. 6A) with the concomitant increase in serum hemoglobin levels (Fig. 6B) and body weight (Fig. 6C). PD treatment inhibited the levels of both c-myc and pERK in IEC of these mice (Fig. 6D and 6E). Furthermore, PD treatment resulted in 100% survival whereas treatment of control animals with vehicle resulted in 100% mortality during the 17 weeks treatment period of Apcmin/+ mice (Fig. 6F). To detect the long-term effects of PD treatment, we delivered it or vehicle to already 17-week PD-treated Apcmin/+ mice, for additional 15 weeks. Continuous PD treatment inhibited tumorigenesis while its discontinuation provoked high tumor count (Fig. 6G). Collectively, these results indicate that the regulation of ERK pathway in Apcmin/+ mice controls intestinal tumorigenesis and the subsequent manifestation of the Min phenotype, most likely via post-translational modifications of c-myc protein.

Figure 6Figure 6Figure 6Figure 6
Activation of ERK is essential for the Min phenotype in Apcmin/+ mice

Discussion

Overt inflammation can promote neoplasia 29,30,31,32. TLR activation of innate immune cells (e.g., macrophages) in the intestinal mucosa provokes the production of various pro-inflammatory mediators 3,5. This mechanism was proposed to enhance tumorigenesis in the Apcmin/+ mice 6. However, our study indicates that MyD88 in non-hematopoietic cells, such as IEC, is required for intestinal tumor growth in the Apcmin/+ mouse. Furthermore, we identified that TLR ligands presumably from intestinal flora (Fig. 4), and not from the host (Fig. 2), mediate IEC tumor growth under the steady-state conditions. In this setting, MyD88-mediated signaling, induces ERK activation that stabilizes and hence, increases the protein level of the oncogene c-myc in IEC 23. This sequence of events enhances IEC proliferation and reduces IEC apoptosis and therefore promotes IEC tumor growth in Apcmin/+ mice.

The oncogene c-myc is a Wnt target gene 33,34. While β-catenin/TCF signaling induces c-myc transcriptionally, its expression levels are heavily regulated by ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation 35,36 which can be antagonized by pERK phosphorylation of c-myc 23,24,25. Our findings indicate that Myd88-dependent, ERK activation is essential to stabilize c-myc levels (Fig. 4), that the activation of ERK by a MyD88-independent ligand, EGF 37, increases c-myc levels and restores the Min phenotype in the Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 5), and that treatment with a specific ERK inhibitor suppresses tumor development in both Apcmin/+ and EGF-treated Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6). Collectively, these data indicate that 1) the loss of heterozygosity of Apc is insufficient to drive the Min phenotype in the Apcmin/+ mouse, 2) that the synergy between c-myc transcription and post-translational modifications are required for tumor growth in this model, 3) activation of ERK is essential for IEC tumorigenesis in the Apcmin/+ mouse and 4) that ERK functions as a major regulator of c-myc expression in the intestinal epithelium (Fig. 6H).

One mechanism that explains tumor suppression due to the inactivation of a single gene product is termed oncogene addiction. This phenomenon occurs when tumors require sustained activation of a single oncogene for their growth and survival, despite other oncogenic events 9. Our data reveal that the IEC tumor growth in the Apcmin/+ mice is due to pERK “addiction”. ERK addiction was shown recently to drive the survival of certain intestinal epithelial cell lines in vitro 38, although via a different pathway. Activation of ERK in this setting is most likely induced by a TLR-MyD88-dependent pathway (e.g., microfora, Fig. 3) and by a TLR-Myd88-independent pathway (e.g, growth factors) (Fig. 5). Consequently, the inhibition of ERK prevents tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice, most likely via the generation of an unstable c-myc protein (Fig. 5--6)6) leading to low c-myc levels in IEC (Fig. 3). Although the regulation of the ERK-c-myc pathway is sufficient for the inhibition of the Min phenotype under the steady state conditions, and its reversal upon EGF administration, in Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice, we can't rule out other anti-apoptotic effects provoked by pERK 38 in IEC of these animals.

The dichotomy in tumor numbers between Apcmin/+ and Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice (Supp. Fig. 1), as well as the biochemical evidence presented above in vitro (Fig. 4) and in vivo (Fig. 5--6),6), highly suggest the inductive role of microflora-derived MyD88 signaling on IEC tumorigenesis in Apcmin/+ mice. These observations reveal a new facet of oncogene-environment interactions, which might explain why a germline mutation in Apc results primarily in tumors originating from the intestinal epithelium (Fig. 6H) and not in other organs. Since pERK is a major player in the induction of the Min phenotype (Fig. 5--6),6), we propose that interventions aimed at inhibiting ERK activation in IEC (Fig. 6) may help suppress the induction of IEC neoplasia in humans with variant Apc genes.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The following antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA): anti-phospho ERK1/2, anti-ERK1/2, anti-c-myc, anti-PARP, anti-β-catenin, anti-PCNA and anti-MyD88. Anti-ubiquitin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-phospho-c-myc (Ser62) antibody for IB and anti-c-myc antibody for immunohistochemistry from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). InSolution™ MG-132 was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA), the MEK1/2 inhibitor (U0126) from Promega (Madison, WI) and the MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD0325901, from Stemgent (San Diego, CA). Anakinra was purchased from Amgen (Kineret®, CA), recombinant mEGF from PeproTech, Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ), the TLR2 ligand, Pam3Cys (P3C) from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA) and the Wnt3a from R&D system (Minneapolis, MN).

Mice

C57Bl/6J, Apcmin/+ and Il1r1-/- mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Myd88-/- mice were kindly provided by Dr. S. Akira (Osaka University, Japan), and were backcrossed 10 generations onto C57Bl/6, Lps2 by Dr. B. Beutler (TSRI, San Diego, CA) and Caspase1-/- mice by Dr. R. Flavell (Yale University, CT). All these mice strain were crossed to Apcmin/+ mice. All animal protocols received prior approval by the Institutional Review Board.

In vivo treatment with Anakinra

Eight to 10 week-old mice Apcmin/+ mice were injected i.p with 50 mg/kg of Anakinra, 5 times/week for ten weeks and analyzed when they reached 20 weeks of age.

In vivo treatment with EGF

Eight to 10 week-old mice were injected i.p with EGF (2 μg/mouse), 3 times/week for 10 weeks and analyzed when they reached 20 weeks of age.

In vivo treatment with an ERK inhibitor

PD0325901 was dissolved initially in DMSO (50 mg/ml) as a stock solution. The stock solution was then diluted fresh in water containing 0.05% (Hydroxypropyl)methycellulose and 0.02% Tween 80. The formulation containing PD0325901 in 250 μl at the 25 mg/kg dose was administered by gavage three times a week to EGF-treated Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice or five times a week to Apcmin/+ mice, for the duration of each study. Controls mice were treated with vehicle (gavage).

Bone marrow (BM) chimeras were generated by reconstituting irradiated (9 Gy of γ-radiation) 6-10 week-old Apcmin/+ and Apcmin/+/Myd88-/- mice with BM cells (1.5 × 107, i.v.) from sex-matched WT or Myd88-/- donor mice. Chimerism was verified by qPCR of peripheral blood cells. Polyp counts were performed when mice reached 20 weeks of age.

BrdU staining was performed using a BrdU in situ staining kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Mice were injected i.p. with 2 mg of BrdU solution. Intestinal tissue samples were fixed with formalin and embedded in paraffin. Immunostaining for labeled BrdU was performed according to the manufacturer's instruction. The enumeration of BrdU positioning was performed as described 39.

TUNEL assay was performed on paraffinized intestinal tissues according to the manufacturer's instruction (BD Biosciences). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Isolation of intestinal epithelial cells, RT-PCR, Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation were performed as previously described 19.

Cell Culture

The human IEC cell lines RKO and Caco-2 were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 4.0 mM glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin.

siRNA-mediated knockdown

Myd88 siRNA or c-myc siRNA from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Briefly, siRNA (40 μM) in 50 μl of Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) was mixed with 5 μl of Dharmafect 4 (Dharmacon, Chicago, IL) in 50 μl of Opti-MEM. After 30 min incubation at RT, the transfection mixture was combined with 1 × 106 cells in culture medium. Non-targeting siRNA #2 (luciferase targeting siRNA) from Dharmacon was used as a control.

Histology and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

DSI and colon were fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin embedded, and sectioned at 3 to 6 μm for H&E staining or immunostaining. The tissue sections were incubated with rabbit anti-c-myc ab (1:50), rabbit anti-pERK ab, or with control ab, overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated in HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for an hour and the staining was visualized with AEC peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA), with hematoxylin nuclear counterstaining.

Blood hemoglobin was measured on a MS9 Blood Analyzer (Melet Schloesing Laboratories, El Cajon, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test for paire samples or two-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and by log-rank analysis for survival curves. Data are presented as means ± s.d.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Patty Charos for animal breeding and Steve Shenouda for tissue processing.

This work was supported by NIH grants AI068685, CA133702, DK35108 and DK080506.

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interest.

Author contributions. E.R. designed the study, S.H.L. and J.L. performed the signaling experiments, C.S., L.H., S.H. and G.S.S. performed the in vivo studies, M.C. generated the bone marrow chimeras, J.B., J.L. and J.G. performed immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, S.H.L., M.P.C, N.V., J.L. and E.R. analyzed the data, and S.H.L., J.L. and E.R. wrote the manuscript.

References

1. Michelsen KS, Arditi M. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity in gut homeostasis and pathology. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007;14:48–54. [PubMed]
2. Sanderson IR, Walker WA. TLRs in the Gut I. The role of TLRs/Nods in intestinal development and homeostasis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G6–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:24–37. [PubMed]
4. Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006;441:431–436. [PubMed]
5. Lin WW, Karin M. A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1175–1183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Medzhitov R. Regulation of spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis through the adaptor protein Myd88. Science. 2007;317:124–127. [PubMed]
7. Oshima M, et al. Loss of Apc heterozygosity and abnormal tissue building in nascent intestinal polyps in mice carrying a truncated Apc gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:4482–4486. [PubMed]
8. Moser AR, Pitot HC, Dove WF. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science. 1990;247:322–324. [PubMed]
9. Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes--the Achilles heal of cancer. Science. 2002;297:63–64. [PubMed]
10. Hurlin PJ, Huang J. The MAX-interacting transcription factor network. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:265–274. [PubMed]
11. Wilkins JA, Sansom OJ. C-Myc is a critical mediator of the phenotypes of Apc loss in the intestine. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4963–4966. [PubMed]
12. Sansom OJ, et al. Myc deletion rescues Apc deficiency in the small intestine. Nature. 2007;446:676–679. [PubMed]
13. Yekkala K, Baudino TA. Inhibition of intestinal polyposis with reduced angiogenesis in Apcmin/+mice due to decreases in c-Myc expression. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:1296–1303. [PubMed]
14. Ignatenko NA, et al. Role of c-Myc in intestinal tumorigenesis of the Apcmin/+mouse. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:1658–1664. [PubMed]
15. Beutler B, et al. Genetic analysis of host resistance: Toll-like receptor signaling and immunity at large. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:353–389. [PubMed]
16. Boulares AH, et al. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in apoptosis. Caspase 3-resistant PARP mutant increases rates of apoptosis in transfected cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:22932–22940. [PubMed]
17. Kelsall BL, Rescigno M. Mucosal dendritic cells in immunity and inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:1091–1095. [PubMed]
18. Cario E, et al. Commensal-associated molecular patterns induce selective toll-like receptor-trafficking from apical membrane to cytoplasmic compartments in polarized intestinal epithelium. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:165–173. [PubMed]
19. Lee J, et al. Maintenance of colonic homeostasis by distinctive apical TLR9 signalling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:1327–1336. [PubMed]
20. Cho HJ, et al. IFN-alpha beta promote priming of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes by immunostimulatory DNA-based vaccines. J Immunol. 2002;168:4907–4913. [PubMed]
21. Apte RN, et al. The involvement of IL-1 in tumorigenesis, tumor invasiveness, metastasis and tumor-host interactions. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:387–408. [PubMed]
22. Pedersen G, Andresen L, Matthiessen MW, Rask-Madsen J, Brynskov J. Expression of Toll-like receptor 9 and response to bacterial CpG oligodeoxynucleotides in human intestinal epithelium. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;141:298–306. [PubMed]
23. Sears R, et al. Multiple Ras-dependent phosphorylation pathways regulate Myc protein stability. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2501–2514. [PubMed]
24. Sears RC. The life cycle of C-myc: from synthesis to degradation. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:1133–1137. [PubMed]
25. Vervoorts J, Luscher-Firzlaff J, Luscher B. The ins and outs of MYC regulation by posttranslational mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34725–34729. [PubMed]
26. Chang WC, et al. Sulindac sulfone is most effective in modulating beta-catenin-mediated transcription in cells with mutant APC. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1059:41–55. [PubMed]
27. Barrett SD, et al. The discovery of the benzhydroxamate MEK inhibitors CI-1040 and PD 0325901. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:6501–6504. [PubMed]
28. Seo TC, Spallholz JE, Yun HK, Kim SW. Selenium-enriched garlic and cabbage as a dietary selenium source for broilers. J Med Food. 2008;11:687–692. [PubMed]
29. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860–867. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2002;16:217–26. 229. discussion 230-2. [PubMed]
31. Fox JG, Wang TC. Inflammation, atrophy, and gastric cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:60–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Pikarsky E, et al. NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature. 2004;431:461–466. [PubMed]
33. He TC, et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 1998;281:1509–1512. [PubMed]
34. Dang CV, et al. The c-Myc target gene network. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:253–264. [PubMed]
35. Hann SR. Role of post-translational modifications in regulating c-Myc proteolysis, transcriptional activity and biological function. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:288–302. [PubMed]
36. Gregory MA, Hann SR. c-Myc proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: stabilization of c-Myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:2423–2435. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Dakour J, Li H, Chen H, Morrish DW. EGF promotes development of a differentiated trophoblast phenotype having c-myc and junB proto-oncogene activation. Placenta. 1999;20:119–126. [PubMed]
38. Wickenden JA, et al. Colorectal cancer cells with the BRAF(V600E) mutation are addicted to the ERK1/2 pathway for growth factor-independent survival and repression of BIM. Oncogene. 2008;27:7150–7161. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Sansom OJ, et al. Loss of Apc in vivo immediately perturbs Wnt signaling, differentiation, and migration. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1385–1390. [PubMed]
40. Dove WF, et al. Intestinal neoplasia in the ApcMin mouse: independence from the microbial and natural killer (beige locus) status. Cancer Res. 1997;57:812–814. [PubMed]