Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Schizophr Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 June 7.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2881633

Specificity of emotion-related effects on attentional processing in schizotypy



In the schizophrenia spectrum, cognitive functions such as perception, language, and attention have been shown to be adversely influenced by negative affect. The present study addressed three issues of specificity and one issue of mechanism regarding affect-related attentional disruption in schizotypy: (1) Is attentional disturbance from negative affective stimuli specific to positive (PS) but not negative schizotypy (NS)? (2) Do positive affective stimuli also foster attentional disturbance? (3) Are anxiety and depression differentially related to PS and NS? (4) Whatever the degree of specificity in these relationships, does anxiety mediate the relationship between schizotypy and attentional disturbance?


Nonpatient participants (N=162) provided responses on scales of schizotypy, anxiety, and depression and performed an emotional Stroop task, judging the ink color of positive, neutral, and negative words.


PS but not NS was associated with poorer attentional performance. This attentional disturbance was specific to negative words. PS was associated with anxiety and depression, whereas NS was associated only with depression. Finally, anxiety and depression did not fully mediate the relationship between PS and attentional interference related to negative affective stimuli.


Findings of attentional disturbance in the presence of negative affective stimuli, particularly in positive schizotypy, have substantial theoretical implications. They provide a path by which the interplay of cognitive and affective phenomena could lead to the formation, maintenance, and exacerbation of positive symptoms, including delusions and hallucinations. Findings from this study also underscore the importance of examining the differential contribution of comorbid anxiety and depression to cognitive and affective function in the schizophrenia spectrum.

Keywords: Schizotypy, Positive schizotypy, Emotional Stroop, Anxiety, Depression

1. Introduction

Cognitive functions such as perception and language are adversely influenced by negative affect in the schizophrenia spectrum (Asarnow et al., 1978; Burbridge and Barch, 2002; Docherty et al., 1994a, b; Kerns and Berenbaum, 2000). The interaction between cognitive and emotional function provides a possible mechanism for the formation and exacerbation of positive symptoms of schizophrenia (Bentall et al., 2001; Freeman et al., 2002; Garety et al., 2007). A critical aspect of cognitive function that is well established as impaired in schizophrenia-spectrum samples is selective attention (Braver et al., 1999; Lubow and Gewirtz, 1995). However, the disruption of attention by negative affective distractors and its relation to positive and negative symptoms has received much less systematic study.

Using a selective attention paradigm in which emotional valence and arousal properties of distractors were manipulated, the present study examined three aspects of the relationship between positive and negative schizotypy dimensions and attention. Studies using the emotional Stroop task in schizophrenia-spectrum samples have demonstrated that paranoid symptoms are associated with interference from threat-related words (Bentall and Kaney, 1989; Epstein et al., 1999; Fear et al., 1996; Leafhead et al., 1996). However, these studies did not examine two important issues. First, they did not examine whether the emotional interference is a broad effect associated with positive and negative dimensions of the schizophrenia spectrum or a narrower effect specific to the positive dimension. Second, research examining the effect of emotion on cognition in the schizophrenia spectrum has utilized only negative stimuli, confounding valence and arousal, which are often distinguished as aspects of emotion. In the present study, the differential relationship of positive and negative schizotypy with attentional interference from emotional stimuli was examined. By using three sets of stimuli (positive, neutral, and negative), the present study was able to distinguish valence and arousal as conceptually orthogonal dimensions (Bradley and Lang, 1998) and examine whether the emotional stimulus induced attentional disturbance in schizotypy is a broad effect of emotion or specific to negative emotion.

A third uncertainty in the available literature is the diagnostic specificity of the emotional interference effects. Thus, distinct from the emotional nature of the immediate task and its relationship to positive and negative symptoms, anxiety and depression may have an important impact on cognitive and affective function in the schizophrenia spectrum. Studies focusing on such relationships have typically relied solely on depression scales or combined depression and anxiety indices (Norman et al., 1998). Very few studies have systematically examined the relationship of dimensions of anxiety and depression to dimensions of schizotypy or schizophrenia (e.g., Lewandowski et al., 2006), and none has systematically explored potentially distinct relationships involving different aspects of anxiety or depression. This is important because psychometrically discernable constructs of anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, and anhedonic depression (Nitschke et al., 2001) differ in the cognitive and neural mechanisms that implement them (Engels et al., 2007; Heller and Nitschke, 1998; Nitschke et al., 1999, 2000) and hence are likely to have different behavioral, personality, and clinical implications for specific aspects of schizotypy and schizophrenia. Thus, as a third goal, the present study examined the relationship between dimensions of schizotypy and dimensions of anxiety and depression.

Finally, because similar attentional biases toward threat-related stimuli are seen in anxiety and schizophrenia-spectrum samples (Bentall and Kaney, 1989; Bentall et al., 1995; Blackwood et al., 2001; Fear et al., 1996; Green et al., 2001; Williams et al., 1996), it has been hypothesized that attentional disturbance in schizotypy and schizophrenia is largely a function of high levels of anxiety associated with them. For example, a study showed that, although anxiety and schizotypy scores independently accounted for variance in attentional dysfunction in a selective attention task, the contribution of anxiety was greater (Braunstein-Bercovitz, 2000; Braunstein-Bercovitz et al., 2002). However, the proposed mediating role of anxiety has not been tested systematically using a formal mediating variable analysis. Thus, the present study examined whether different dimensions of anxiety (anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, trait anxiety, and anxiety sensitivity) mediate the relationship between dimensional schizotypy and attentional interference.

2. Method

2.1. Participants

One-hundred and sixty-two (92 female) unselected, right-handed, native-English-speaking psychology undergraduate students (Mean/SD age=18/.73 years) participated in the study for course credit. Participants were screened to ensure that they were not color-blind and gave informed consent prior to participation approved by the campus IRB.

2.2. Questionnaires

The Chapman scales for psychosis proneness (Chapman et al., 1976, 1978; Eckblad and Chapman, 1983) were used to measure positive schizotypy with the perceptual aberration (PerAb) and magical ideation (MagId) subscales and negative schizotypy with the physical anhedonia (PhyAn) and social anhedonia (SocAn) subscales (see Chmielewski et al., 1995, for normative data, and Edell, 1995, for reliability and validity data on the Chapman scales, which have similar reliabilities). Since PerAb and MagId scales share up to half of their variance (here correlating .662, p<.001), select many of the same subjects, and possibly identify the same syndrome (Eckblad and Chapman, 1983), a positive-schizotypy index was computed as the sum of PerAb and MagId z scores. Similarly, PhyAn and SocAn (r=.464, p<.001) were combined by summing PhyAn and SocAn z scores (see Barrantes-Vidal et al., 2003, for similar combination). The positive and negative schizotypy composite scores provide essentially orthogonal measures (r=.14, n.s.; see Table 2). In addition to schizotypy measures, the present study utilized measures of anxiety, depression, and substance use listed in Table 1.

Table 1
Questionnaire measures of anxiety, depression, and substance use
Table 2
Correlations between schizotypy, RT interference, and anxiety and depression measures

2.3. Stimuli and task

The emotional Stroop interference task consisted of four blocks of positive or negative affective words alternating with eight blocks of neutral words. Stimuli were blocked on emotional valence due to greater ecological validity and evidence from pilot studies and published evidence indicating more robust behavioral effects for blocked than intermixed trials (Compton et al., 2000; Dalgleish, 1995; Holle et al., 1997). Each block consisted of 16 trials with one trial occurring every 2000 ms. Stimulus presentation and collection of response times (RT) were controlled by STIM software from James Long Co. A trial began with the presentation of a word for 1500 ms, followed by a fixation cross for 500 ms. The word was presented in one of four ink colors (red, yellow, green, and blue), with each color occurring equally often with each word type (positive, neutral, and negative). Trials were pseudorandomized such that no more than two trials featuring the same color appeared in a row. Using two button boxes (one for the left and other for the right hand), participants were asked to ignore the meaning and respond with the ink color of the words as quickly and accurately as possible. The mapping of the four colors to the first and second fingers of each hand was counterbalanced in order to control for possible laterality-related effects in reaction time. The first and third blocks presented were neutral words, with positive and negative blocks presented either second or fourth (a four-block pattern that was repeated for the total of 16 blocks) and with valence order counterbalanced across participants. Words were carefully selected on the basis of established norms for valence, arousal, and frequency of usage in the English language (Bradley and Lang, 1998) as well as for number of letters (three to eight). Of the 256 words, 64 were positive (e.g., birthday, ecstasy, laughter), 64 were negative (e.g., suicide, war, victim), and two sets of 64 were neutral (e.g., hydrant, moment, carpet). The positive and negative words did not differ in arousal ratings, frequency (p<.05). The two sets of neutral words did not differ from each other (p<.05) but differed intentionally from the positive and negative words in valence and arousal ratings (p<.05).

2.4. Procedure

After providing informed consent, participants completed the questionnaires in group sessions and the emotional interference task in individual half-hour computer sessions. The delay between questionnaire and individual lab sessions ranged from two to eight weeks. In the computer session, participants were seated 115 cm from the computer monitor at eye level in a semi-darkened room and instructed to identify the ink color of each word while ignoring the word’s meaning. Participants were given 24 practice trials prior to the experimental task. The principal measures during this task were emotional interference for positive (positive-word RT minus neutral-word RT) and negative (negative-word RT minus neutral-word RT) words. From the full N of 162 participants, RT data were unavailable for two participants, and questionnaire data were unavailable from one participant.

3. Results

The mean scores obtained by the participants on the four scales of psychosis proneness, PerAb (M=4.98, SD=5.57), MagId (M = 8.05, SD = 5.40), PhyAn (M = 10.41, SD=6.19), and SocAn (M=6.78, SD=5.07), were similar to each other in range and distribution and similar to scores obtained in a very large undergraduate sample (Chmielewski et al., 1995). The emotion interference manipulation was successful: emotional words were associated with delayed responses, with both positive words and negative words reliably showing interference (positive interference mean=9 ms, SD=42 ms, t(159)=2.63, p=.009; negative interference mean=19 ms, SD=49 ms, t(159)=4.84, p<.001). Table 2 presents zero-order correlations between the self-report measures and RT interference.

Table 3 presents the results of seven sets of hierarchical regressions conducted with schizotypy measures as predictors and RT interference, anxiety, or depression as dependent variables (DV). In each set of regressions, positive schizotypy was entered alone as a predictor, then negative schizotypy was entered alone, and finally both positive and negative schizotypy were entered together (full model). Of primary interest was the increment in variance accounted for (ΔR2) when each was added second, as a means of evaluating the unique variance each contributed.

Table 3
Positive and negative schizotypy predicting RT interference, anxiety, and depression

Centrally relevant to the goals of the study, higher positive but not negative schizotypy scores were associated with greater negative-word interference (p =.007). Examination of positive schizotypy and attentional interference suggested a nonlinear relationship. Dividing the sample into quartiles of positive schizotypy score, Fig. 1 illustrates a monotonic relationship between positive schizotypy and negative-word interference, with the greatest interference for the highest-scoring group, F(3, 156)=2.72, p<.05. This group showed more negative-word interference than the other three groups, which did not differ, as confirmed by a Newman–Keuls test (p<.05). Parallel examination of the other combinations of positive vs. negative schizotypy and positive vs. negative stimuli showed no such relationship. Education, gender, and substance abuse were not associated with negative-word interference and did not mediate the relationship between positive schizotypy and negative-word interference (all ps nonsignificant).

Fig. 1
Nonlinear relationship between positive schizotypy (x-axis, subjects grouped by quartile) and negative-word interference (y-axis, negative-word RT minus neutral-word RT).

Table 3 shows that positive schizotypy was also uniquely associated with measures of anxiety and depression. Only for depression did negative schizotypy, added second, also provide unique variance. To evaluate a possible mediating role of anxiety in the relationship between positive schizotypy and interference for negative words, the regression procedure of Baron and Kenny (1986) was followed. The procedure requires, first, that the independent variable, IV (positive schizotypy) correlate with the DV (negative-word interference; p<.01 in Table 2). Second, the potential mediator (anxiety or depression) must correlate with the IV. As Table 3 and Fig. 2 show, all potential mediators correlated significantly with positive schizotypy scores. Third, the mediator should predict the DV even when the variance associated with the IV is removed. Anxious apprehension and anxiety sensitivity met this criterion. Finally, for complete mediation, the correlation of IV and DV, with mediator variance removed, should not differ from zero. Fig. 2 shows that the relationship of positive schizotypy to negative-word interference remained significant even when the variance associated with anxious apprehension or anxiety sensitivity was removed. Thus, none of the anxiety or depression measures completely mediated the relationship between positive schizotypy and attentional interference for negative words. Anxious apprehension and anxiety sensitivity met three of the four requirements and thus partially mediated the relationship.

Fig. 2
Results of analyses conducted to evaluate a possible mediating role for anxiety in the relationship between positive schizotypy (IV) and interference for negative words (DV). The numbers in bold correspond to the potential mediators depicted in the center ...

4. Discussion

The present study addressed three issues of specificity and one issue of mechanism regarding attentional disturbance in schizotypy: (1) Given that negative affect fosters positive symptoms, is attentional disturbance associated with negative affective stimuli specific to positive schizotypy or also associated with negative schizotypy? (2) Given that negative affect fosters cognitive disturbance, do positive affective stimuli also foster cognitive disturbance? (3) Are anxiety and depression differentially associated with positive and negative schizotypy? (4) Whatever the degree of specificity in these relationships, does anxiety mediate the relationship between schizotypy and attentional disturbance?

Negative-word interference was predicted by positive but not negative schizotypy indicating that it is specific to positive schizotypy. The relationship between positive schizotypy and negative-word interference, though monotonic and significant in linear regressions, was skewed, carried by high scores on positive schizotypy. Thus, this relationship is likely to be evident only with large samples or toward the clinically significant end of this dimension. It is notable that the 37 ms negative-word interference for the high positive-schizotypy group is in line with 30–40 ms reported by Matthews and Harley (1996) for similar words in clinical groups (e.g., PTSD), so the present sample adequately represented clinical levels of severity with respect to this phenomenon.

The second issue was whether this attentional interference from negative affective stimuli would extend to positive stimuli. Results found no evidence that positive stimuli foster attentional interference. The zero-order correlations in Table 2 show that positive-word interference was unrelated to all other variables. With the largest correlation of .04 and a substantial sample size, lack of statistical power is not a plausible explanation for this null result. Thus, present results strongly indicate that only negatively valenced stimuli contribute to attentional interference in schizotypy. Furthermore, supplementary tests indicated that attentional interference was not due to an overall effect of arousal: analyses examining the relationship of positive and negative schizotypy to emotional arousal ([positive RT plus negative RT] minus [2*neutral RT]) were not significant.

Several factors could account for the increased attentional disturbance related to negative affective stimuli in schizotypy. This relationship could be mediated by heightened responsivity to stressors in the schizophrenia spectrum as evidenced by personality (Berenbaum and Fujita, 1994), neuroendocrine (Breier et al., 1991; Walker et al., 1996), psychophysiological (Fernandes and Miller, 1995; Kring, 1999; Kring and Neale, 1996; Nuechterlein and Subotnik, 1998; Simons et al., 1993), and experience-sampling (Myin-Germeys et al., 2000, 2001) studies. Similar affect processing abnormalities noted in nonpatients with elevated positive-schizotypy scores (Fernandes and Miller, 1995) may account for the cognitive impairment related to negative affective stimuli seen in the present study and elsewhere (Kerns and Berenbaum, 2000). Increased attentional disturbance related to negative affective stimuli in schizotypy may also be related to deficits in executive function. For example, a recent neuroimaging study reported that nonpatients high in positive schizotypy showed poorer recruitment of cognitive control mechanisms implemented in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the presence of negative distractors (Mohanty et al., 2005). In addition, positive schizotypy was associated with abnormal activity in ventral striatal and limbic areas (nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, and amygdala) that constitute a circuit believed to play a crucial role in the interaction and integration of cognitive and affective processes. Dysfunction in any component of this circuit has been hypothesized to contribute to cognitive/affective dysfunction commonly seen in schizophrenia (Grace and Moore, 1998).

The present finding that attentional function is compromised in the presence of negative affective stimuli, even in nonpatients, has substantial theoretical implications. It provides a path by which the interplay of cognitive and affective phenomena could lead to the formation, maintenance, and exacerbation of positive symptoms, including delusions and hallucinations (Freeman et al., 2002; Garety et al., 2001). Disturbance in contextual processing due to an attentional bias toward negative stimuli may play an important role in the development and maintenance of delusional conviction, loosening of associations, and flight of ideas. Present findings also support the prediction that attentional impairment due to negative affect accounts for affect-related disruptions in other cognitive processes in schizotypy and schizophrenia. For example, reasoning errors in schizophrenia have been shown to be a product of inappropriate discrimination between relevant and irrelevant data, a deficit that is accentuated in the context of negative stimuli (Mujica-Parodi et al., 2000).

The third issue motivating the present study was an examination of the relationship between dimensions of anxiety, depression, and schizotypy. Positive schizotypy was associated with measures of anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, trait anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and depression. In contrast, negative schizotypy was associated only with depression. This pattern of results is particularly important because of extensive evidence indicating that components of anxiety and depression differ in cognitive and neural mechanisms (Engels et al., 2007; Keller et al., 2000; Nitschke et al., 1999, 2000). Thus, cognitive processes distinguishing anxious apprehension and anxious arousal may have different implications for how symptoms of psychosis manifest and respond to treatment (Garety et al., 2001). Anxious arousal may play an important role in triggering psychotic symptom onset and exacerbation. For example, it has been reported that vulnerable individuals experience a period characterized by sympathetic nervous system hyperarousal prior to an active phase of schizophrenia and psychotic symptom exacerbation (Hazlett et al., 1997; Nuechterlein and Dawson, 1984; Nuechterlein and Subotnik, 1998). Similarly, anxious arousal, panic attacks, and psychostimulants have been reported to trigger symptom onset and exacerbation of psychotic symptoms (Allen and Argus, 1968; Janowsky et al., 1973; Sandberg and Siris, 1987). Depression during the acute phase of schizophrenia may be associated with a favorable course and outcome (Vaillant, 1964), whereas depression during the residual phase is associated with worse prognosis (Johnson, 1988). Finally, anxious apprehension shares features (e.g., attentional bias to threat), themes (e.g., anticipation of danger), and maintenance factors (e.g., safety behaviors) with certain positive symptoms such as persecutory delusions (Freeman and Garety, 2003), which might contribute to the association of negative affect-induced cognitive disturbance with positive symptoms.

Finally, the present study investigated whether anxiety mediates the relationship between positive schizotypy and attentional interference. Although Braunstein-Bercovitz (2000) reported that anxiety accounts for greater variance in attentional disruption in high schizotypy scorers than do schizotypy measures, the role of anxiety as a mediator was not tested. Present results showed that although anxious apprehension and anxiety sensitivity partially mediated the relationship between positive schizotypy and attentional interference, none of the anxiety or depression measures fully mediated the relationship. These findings are consistent with an fMRI study showing that abnormal brain activity in response to negative affective stimuli in a positive-schizotypy sample is not fully mediated by anxiety (Mohanty et al., 2005).

Berenbaum (1995) suggested that the intricate relationship between emotion and cognition seen in individuals with schizophrenia or with vulnerability to it is as noteworthy as the relationship between emotion and cognition in individuals with emotional disorders. Present findings demonstrate the impact of affective factors on attentional function in the schizophrenia spectrum and highlight the importance of examining the role of cognitive/affective interactions in the development and maintenance of symptoms in schizophrenia.


We thank Emily Cahill for her assistance in formatting and proofreading the manuscript.

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by NIH grants R01 MH61358, F31 MH068123, T32 MH14257, and T32 MH19554; the NIMH had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.


Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


All authors were involved in data collection. Aprajita Mohanty designed the study, conducted literature searches and statistical analyses, and was the primary author of the manuscript. Gregory Miller and Wendy Heller contributed to writing it and provided laboratory resources, funding, and oversight. Nancy Koven was also involved in designing the study. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.


  • Allen TE, Argus B. Hyperventilation leading to hallucinations. Am J Psychiatr. 1968;125 (5):632–637. [PubMed]
  • Asarnow RF, Cromwell RL, Rennick PM. Cognitive and evoked response measures of information processing in schizophrenics with and without a family history of schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1978;166 (10):719–730. [PubMed]
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51 (6):1173–1182. [PubMed]
  • Barrantes-Vidal N, Fananas L, Rosa A, Caparros B, Riba M Dolors, Obiols JE. Neurocognitive, behavioral and neuro-developmental correlates of schizotypy clusters in adolescents from the general population. Schizophr Res. 2003;61 (2–3):293–302. [PubMed]
  • Bentall RP, Corcoran R, Howard R, Blackwood N, Kinderman P. Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical integration. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21 (8):1143–1192. [PubMed]
  • Bentall RP, Kaney S. Content specific information processing and persecutory delusions: an investigation using the emotional Stroop test. Br J Med Psychol. 1989;62 (4):355–364. [PubMed]
  • Bentall RP, Kaney S, Bowen-Jones K. Persecutory delusions and recall of threat-related, depression-related and neutral words. Cognit Ther Res. 1995;19 (4):445–457.
  • Berenbaum H. Toward a definition of schizophrenia. In: Miller GA, editor. The Behavioral High-risk Paradigm in Psychopathology. Springer; New York: 1995. pp. 181–196.
  • Berenbaum H, Fujita F. Schizophrenia and personality: exploring the boundaries and connections between vulnerability and outcome. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103 (1):148–158. [PubMed]
  • Blackwood NJ, Howard RJ, Bentall RP, Murray RM. Cognitive neuropsychiatric models of persecutory delusions. Am J Psychiatr. 2001;158 (4):527–539. [PubMed]
  • Bradley MM, Lang PJ. The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention. University of Florida; Gainesville, FL: 1998. Affective norms for English words (ANEW)
  • Braunstein-Bercovitz H. Is the attentional dysfunction in schizotypy related to anxiety? Schizophr Res. 2000;46 (2–3):255–267. [PubMed]
  • Braunstein-Bercovitz H, Rammsayer T, Gibbons H, Lubow RE. Latent inhibition deficits in high-schizotypal normals: symptom-specific or anxiety-related? Schizophr Res. 2002;53 (1–2):109–121. [PubMed]
  • Braver TS, Barch DM, Cohen JD. Cognition and control in schizophrenia: a computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function. Biol Psychiatr. 1999;46 (3):312–328. [PubMed]
  • Breier A, Wolkowitz OM, Pickar D. Stress and schizophrenia. In: Tamminga CA, Schulz CS, editors. Schizophrenia Research: Advances in Neuropsychiatry and Psychopharmacology. Vol. 1. Raven Press, Ltd; New York: 1991. pp. 141–152.
  • Burbridge JA, Barch DM. Emotional valence and reference disturbance in schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111 (1):186–191. [PubMed]
  • Chapman LJ, Chapman JP, Raulin ML. Scales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976;85 (4):374–382. [PubMed]
  • Chapman LJ, Chapman JP, Raulin ML. Body-image aberration in schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978;87 (4):399–407. [PubMed]
  • Chmielewski PM, Fernandes LOL, Yee CM, Miller GA. Ethnicity and gender in scales of psychosis-proneness and mood disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1995;104 (3):464–470. [PubMed]
  • Compton RJ, Heller W, Banich MT, Palmieri PA, Miller GA. Responding to threat: hemispheric asymmetries and inter-hemispheric division of input. Neuropsychology. 2000;14 (2):254–264. [PubMed]
  • Dalgleish T. Performance on the emotional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert, and control subjects: a comparison of computer and card presentation formats. Cognit Emot. 1995;9 (4):341–362.
  • Docherty NM, Evans IM, Sledge WH, Seibyl JP, Krystal JH. Affective reactivity of language in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994a;182 (2):98–102. [PubMed]
  • Docherty NM, Sledge WH, Wexler BE. Affective reactivity of language in stable schizophrenic outpatients and their parents. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994b;182 (6):313–318. [PubMed]
  • Eckblad M, Chapman LJ. Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51 (2):215–225. [PubMed]
  • Edell WS. The psychometric measurement of schizotypy using the Wisconsin scales of psychosis-proneness. In: Miller GA, editor. The Behavioral High-risk Paradigm in Psychopathology. Springer; New York: 1995. pp. 3–46.
  • Engels AS, Heller W, Mohanty A, Herrington JD, Banich MT, Webb AG, Miller GA. Specificity of regional brain activity in anxiety types during emotion processing. Psychophysiology. 2007;44 (3):343–351. [PubMed]
  • Epstein J, Stern E, Silbersweig D. Mesolimbic activity associated with psychosis in schizophrenia: symptom-specific PET studies. In: McGinty JF, editor. Advancing from the Ventral Striatum to the Extended Amygdala: Implications for Neuropsy-chiatry and Drug Use: in Honor of Lennart Heimer. New York Academy of Sciences; New York: 1999. pp. 562–574. [PubMed]
  • Fear C, Sharp H, Healy D. Cognitive processes in delusional disorders. Br J Psychiatr. 1996;168 (1):61–67. [PubMed]
  • Fernandes LOL, Miller GA. Compromised performance and abnormal psychophysiology associated with the Wisconsin scales of psychosis proneness. In: Miller GA, editor. The Behavioral High-risk Paradigm in Psychopathology. Springer; New York: 1995. pp. 47–87.
  • Freeman D, Garety PA. Connecting neurosis and psychosis: the direct influence of emotion on delusions and hallucinations. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41 (8):923–947. [PubMed]
  • Freeman D, Garety P, Kuipers E, Fowler D, Bebbington PE. A cognitive model of persecutory delusions. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002;41 (4):331–347. [PubMed]
  • Garety PA, Kuipers E, Fowler D, Bebbington PE. A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis. Psychol Med. 2001;31:189–195. [PubMed]
  • Garety PA, Bebbington PE, Fowler D, Freeman D, Kuipers E. Implications for neurobiological research of cognitive models of psychosis: a theoretical paper. Psychol Med. 2007;37 (10):1377–1391. [PubMed]
  • Grace AA, Moore H. Regulation of information flow in the nucleus accumbens: a model for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In: Lenzenweger F, Dworkin RH, editors. Origins and Development of Schizophrenia: Advances in Experimental Psychopathology. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC: 1998. pp. 123–157.
  • Green MJ, Williams LM, Davidson DJ. Processing of threat-related affect is delayed in delusion-prone individuals. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001;40 (2):157–165. [PubMed]
  • Hazlett H, Dawson ME, Schell AM, Nuechterlein KH. Electrodermal activity as a prodromal sign in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatr. 1997;41 (1):111–113. [PubMed]
  • Heller W, Nitschke JB. The puzzle of regional brain activity in depression and anxiety: the importance of subtypes and comorbidity. Cognit Emot. 1998;12 (3):421–447.
  • Holle C, Neely JH, Heimberg RG. The effects of blocked versus random presentation and semantic relatedness of stimulus words on response to a modified Stroop task among social phobics. Cognit Ther Res. 1997;21 (6):681–697.
  • Janowsky DS, El-Yousef MK, Davis JM, Sekerke JH. Antagonistic effects of physostigmine and methylphenidate in man. Am J Psychiatr. 1973;130 (12):1370–1376. [PubMed]
  • Johnson DAW. Significance of depression in the prediction of relapse in chronic schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatr. 1988;152 (3):320–323. [PubMed]
  • Keller J, Nitschke JB, Bhargava T, Deldin PJ, Gergen JA, Miller GA, Heller W. Neuropsychological differentiation of depression and anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109 (1):3–10. [PubMed]
  • Kerns JG, Berenbaum H. Aberrant semantic and affective processing in people at risk for psychosis. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109 (4):728–732. [PubMed]
  • Kring AM. Emotion in schizophrenia: old mystery, new understanding. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1999;8 (5):160–163.
  • Kring AM, Neale JM. Do schizophrenic patients show a disjunctive relationship among expressive, experiential, and psychophysiological components of emotion? J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105 (2):249–257. [PubMed]
  • Leafhead KM, Young AW, Szulecka TK. Delusions demand attention. Cognit Neuropsychiatr. 1996;1 (1):5–16. [PubMed]
  • Lewandowski KE, Barrantes-Vidal N, Nelson-Gray RO, Clancy C, Kepley HO, Kwapil TR. Anxiety and depression symptoms in psychometrically identified schizotypy. Schizophr Res. 2006;83 (2–3):225–235. [PubMed]
  • Lubow RE, Gewirtz JC. Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychol Bull. 1995;117 (1):87–103. [PubMed]
  • Maller RG, Reiss S. Anxiety sensitivity in 1984 and panic attacks in 1987. J Anxiety Disord. 1992;6 (3):241–247.
  • Matthews G, Harley TA. Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias. Cognit Emot. 1996;10 (6):561–600.
  • Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28 (6):487–495. [PubMed]
  • Mohanty A, Herrington JD, Koven NS, Fisher JE, Wenzel EA, Webb AG, Heller W, Banich MT, Miller GA. Neural mechanisms of affective interference in schizotypy. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114:16–27. [PubMed]
  • Molina S, Borkovec TD. The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In: Davey GCL, Tallis F, editors. Worrying: Perspectives on Theory, Assessment and Treatment. Wiley Series in Clinical Psychology. Wiley Publishing; Chichester, NY: 1994. pp. 265–283.
  • Mujica-Parodi LR, Malaspina D, Sackheim HA. Logical processing, affect, and delusional thought in schizophrenia. Harv Rev Psychiatr. 2000;8 (2):73–83. [PubMed]
  • Myin-Germeys I, Delespaul PAEG, deVries MW. Schizophrenia patients are more emotionally active than is assumed based on their behavior. Schizophr Bull. 2000;26 (4):847–853. [PubMed]
  • Myin-Germeys I, van Os J, Schwartz JE, Stone AA, Delespaul PA. Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 2001;58 (12):1137–1144. [PubMed]
  • Nitschke JB, Heller W, Imig JC, McDonald RP, Miller GA. Distinguishing dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognit Ther Res. 2001;25 (1):1–22.
  • Nitschke JB, Heller W, Miller GA. Anxiety, stress, and cortical brain function. In: Borod JC, editor. The Neuropsychology of Emotion. Series in Affective Science. Oxford University Press; New York: 2000. pp. 298–319.
  • Nitschke JB, Heller W, Palmieri PA, Miller GA. Contrasting patterns of brain activity in anxious apprehension and anxious arousal. Psychophysiology. 1999;36 (5):628–637. [PubMed]
  • Norman RMG, Malla AK, Cortese L, Diaz F. Aspects of dysphoria and symptoms of schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 1998;28 (6):1433–1441. [PubMed]
  • Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME. A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophr Bull. 1984;10 (2):300–312. [PubMed]
  • Nuechterlein KH, Subotnik KL. The cognitive origins of schizophrenia and prospects for intervention. In: Wykes T, Tarrier N, Lewis S, editors. Outcome and Innovation in Psychological Treatment of Schizophrenia. John Wiley; New York: 1998. pp. 17–41.
  • Peterson RA, Heilbronner RL. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index: construct validity and factor analytic structure. J Anxiety Disord. 1987;1 (2):117–121.
  • Peterson RA, Reiss S. Anxiety Sensitivity Index Manual. 2. International Diagnostic Systems; Worthington, OH: 1992.
  • Sandberg L, Siris SG. “Panic disorder” in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987;175 (10):627–628. [PubMed]
  • Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De La Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88 (6):791–804. [PubMed]
  • Simons RF, Fitzgibbons L, Fiorino E. Emotion-processing in anhedonia. In: Birbaumer N, Ohman A, editors. The Organization of Emotion. Hogrefe, Toronto: 1993. pp. 288–306.
  • Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. 1982;7 (4):363–371. [PubMed]
  • Spielberger C, Gorusch R, Lushene R, Vagg P, Jacobs G. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; Palo Alto, CA: 1983.
  • Vaillant GE. Prospective prediction of schizophrenic remission. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1964;21 (11):509–518. [PubMed]
  • Walker EF, Neumann CC, Baum K, Davis DM. The developmental pathways to schizophrenia: potential moderating effects of stress. Dev Psychopathol. 1996;8 (4):647–665.
  • Watson D, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Clark LA, Strauss ME, McCormick RA. Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. J Abnorm Psychol. 1995;104 (1):3–14. [PubMed]
  • Williams JMG, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull. 1996;120 (1):3–24. [PubMed]