PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of comintbioLink to Publisher's site
 
Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Jan-Feb; 3(1): 60–63.
PMCID: PMC2881244

Multisensory integration for odor tracking by flying Drosophila

Behavior, circuits and speculation

Abstract

Many see fruit flies as an annoyance, invading our homes with a nagging persistence and efficiency. Yet from a scientific perspective, these tiny animals are a wonder of multisensory integration, capable of tracking fragmented odor plumes amidst turbulent winds and constantly varying visual conditions. The peripheral olfactory, mechanosensory, and visual systems of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, have been studied in great detail;14 however, the mechanisms by which fly brains integrate information from multiple sensory modalities to facilitate robust odor tracking remain elusive. Our studies on olfactory orientation by flying flies reveal that these animals do not simply follow their “nose“; rather, fruit flies require mechanosensory and visual input to track odors in flight.5,6 Collectively, these results shed light on the neural circuits involved in odor localization by fruit flies in the wild and illuminate the elegant complexity underlying a behavior to which the annoyed and amazed are familiar.

Key words: vision, olfaction, mechanosensory, antennae, visual processing, motor control, insect behavior, behavioral neuroscience, neuroethology, sensory ecology

We used a free-yaw magnetic tether flight simulator surrounded by a circular LED arena and equipped with a spatially discreet odor plume6,7 to determine the influence of multiple sensory stimuli on olfactory orientation: a hungry fly actively turning toward an attractive apple cider vinegar stimulus. When flies are positioned, for example, 90 degrees to the right of an odor plume they execute a series of left turns, or saccades, directed toward the plume5 (Fig. 1A) indicating that these animals are capable of detecting and responding to a spatial odor gradient in flight. This seemingly simple task requires the perception of the odor gradient and a resulting asymmetrical activation of thoracic steering muscles underlying saccades. However, it is currently unclear whether olfactory circuits influence steering behavior independently and parallel to other sensory modalities or if pre-motor neurons controlling olfactory mediated saccades receive multi-modal sensory input.

Figure 1
Olfactory orientation in flight requires multisensory input. (A, top) In a free-yaw magnetic tether flight arena,7 flying flies were positioned with an oscillating vertical stripe 90° to the right (blue arrows) of a 20° apple cider vinegar ...

Olfactory orientation begins when odor molecules bind to olfactory receptors in the dendritic membranes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs, Fig. 2A, orange) housed in sensilla on the surface of the 3rd antennal segments (a3) and maxillary palps.8,9 We found that eliminating olfactory input to, for example, the left antennal ORNs by occluding the left a3 with glue abolishes leftward olfactory orientation5 (Fig. 1B). This suggests that antennal ORNs, rather than maxillary palp ORNs, are critical for detecting the spatial odor gradient. Although some ORNs project unilaterally9 and could theoretically preserve gradient information, the ORNs thought to underlie behavioral responses to apple cider vinegar project bilaterally to both the left and right antennal lobes10 suggesting that these ORNs might have an as yet uncharacterized capacity to relay gradient information to second order olfactory projection neurons (PNs). PNs innervate higher order olfactory processing centers, namely the mushroom body (MB) and the lateral horn11 (LH, Fig. 2A, orange). However anatomical studies on Drosophila have not revealed robust connections between these centers and premotor interneurons that relay information from the brain to the thoracic motor centers.12,13 This suggests that olfactory information follows an indirect route to influence flight behavior, a route possibly mapped by the peculiar requirement of the wind sensing mechanosensory system for olfactory orientation in flight.

Figure 2
Anatomical model for olfactory orientation. (A) Odor activates first-order olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) housed in the 3rd antennal segment (a3) which connect unilaterally, or bilaterally to specific second-order olfactory projection neurons (PNs) ...

Flying Drosophila readily fly upwind,14 a behavior mediated through hundreds of stretch sensitive neurons housed in the second antennal segment (a2) known collectively as the Johnston’s organ (JO).15,16 JO neurons encode the rotation of a3 relative to a2 induced by external wind, gravity and sound1,3,17 and project to defined stimulus specific regions of the antennal motor and mechanosensory centers (ammc).18 Removing input to the left JO, for example, by immobilizing the left a3 relative to a2, impairs upwind orientation to the left.16 Based on this study and existing neural models for wind sensation we speculate that wind mediated saccades to the left are elicited by the passive clockwise rotation of the a3s by wind (Fig. 2B-1) and the resulting activation of zones C and E of the ammc ipsilateral and contralateral to the wind, respectively1 (Fig. 2B-2). The requirement of the JO ipsilateral to a wind stimulus suggests that the activation of zone C by JO neurons and possibly through the subsequent activation of pre-motor interneurons arising in the ammc3,19,20 triggers directed saccades (Fig. 2B-3).

Likewise, we found that immobilizing the left JO abolishes leftward olfactory orientation in the absence of wind5 (Fig. 1C), suggesting that the olfactory system recruits the wind sensing mechanosensory system to initiate olfactory driven saccades. We propose that the active olfactory recruitment of this system is mediated through a class of neurons found in the Drosophila brain which appear to connect the axon terminals of PNs in the ventral LH to possible regions of interest in the ammc13 (Fig. 2A, maroon). We further believe the comparatively higher activation of the left ORNs and PNs, in response to an odor on the left (Fig. 2C-1) and through LH-ammc interneurons (Fig. 2C-2), triggers a leftward saccade mediated by the left ammc. However, the requirement of the JO ipsalateral to the odor stimulus suggests that asymmetrical olfactory cues must activate first-order JO neurons to initiate saccades, possibly through asymmetrical activation of motor neurons arising from the ammc and terminating in muscles in the a2s21 (Fig. 2A, yellow, and Fig. 2C-3). We speculate that these muscles serve to actively rotate the a3s to mimic a passive wind stimulus (Fig. 2C-4) and trigger an ammc mediated saccade (Fig. 2C-5).

This hypothesis is perhaps not as speculative as it may seem since similar systems exist in other insects.22,23 However, little is known about the actual motor neurons which arise from the Drosophila ammc, the muscles in the a2s, and the actual antennal movements in flight. Coupling of the olfactory and mechanosensory systems seems ethologically advantageous for a fly given that an odor source will generally be located upwind.24 Additionally, upwind flight is enhanced in the presence of an odor14 and both a headwind and attractive olfactory cues trigger increases in wing beat frequency and amplitude.25,26 Most interesting, however, is that the ventral LH is not only a site of olfactory and mechanosensory integration but might receive visual input as well.13

Curiously, flies require visual feedback to localize an odor source in free flight27 and consistent with this study and our previous results,6 we found that flies generally fail to direct saccades toward an attractive odor plume in the absence of panoramic visual feedback (Fig. 1D). We suggest that, despite their unknown polarity,11 this dependence is due to a class of neurons in Drosophila that connect the optic glomeruli of the ventrolateral protocerebrum (vlpr) to the ventral LH13 (Fig. 2A, green). We posit that these neurons, similar to those in other insects,28,29 gate incoming olfactory information to the ammc and, considering that the rate of saccade initiation increases in the absence of visual cues,6 might also modulate the frequency of ammc mediated saccades. This also raises the intriguing possibility that, similar to bees,28 visual input might directly activate antennal movements in flies. Furthermore, as the most prominent site for the multisensory convergence relevant to olfactory orientation in Drosophila, the LH might also be involved in the olfactory influence on optomotor flight behavior30 and the cross-modal enhancement of visual and olfactory memory in flies.31 Contrary to the idea that each sensory modality influences behavior independent of one another via separate and parallel descending tracts, our results are converging upon the notion that olfactory orientation, whether in the wild or in the kitchen, relies heavily on tightly integrated multi-modal reflexes.

Footnotes

References

1. Yorozu S, Wong A, Fischer BJ, Dankert H, Kernan MJ, Kamikouchi A, et al. Distinct sensory representations of wind and near-field sound in the Drosophila brain. Nature. 2009;458:201–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Stocker RF. The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;275:3–26. [PubMed]
3. Kamikouchi A, Inagaki HK, Effertz T, Hendrich O, Fiala A, Gopfert MC, et al. The neural basis of Drosophila gravity-sensing and hearing. Nature. 2009;458:165–171. [PubMed]
4. Rister J, Pauls D, Schnell B, Ting CY, Lee CH, Sinakevitch I, Morante J, et al. Dissection of the peripheral motion channel in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron. 2007;56:155–170. [PubMed]
5. Duistermars BJ, Chow DM, Frye MA. Flies require bilateral sensory input to track odor gradients in flight. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1301–1307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Duistermars BJ, Frye MA. Crossmodal visual input for odor tracking during fly flight. Curr Biol. 2008;18:270–275. [PubMed]
7. Duistermars BJ, Frye M. A magnetic tether system to investigate visual and olfactory mediated flight control in Drosophila. J Vis Exp. 21:(pii):1063. doi: 10.3791/1063. [PubMed]
8. Vosshall LB, Amrein H, Morozov PS, Rzhetsky A, Axel R. A spatial map of olfactory receptor expression in the Drosophila antenna. Cell. 1999;96:725–736. [PubMed]
9. Stocker RF, Lienhard MC, Borst A, Fischback K-F. Neuronal architecture of the antennal lobe in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 1990;262:9–34. [PubMed]
10. Semmelhack JL, Wang JW. Select Drosophila glomeruli mediate innate olfactory attraction and aversion. Nature. 2009;459:218–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Jefferis GS, Potter CJ, Chan AM, Marin EC, Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, et al. Comprehensive maps of Drosophila higher olfactory centers: spatially segregated fruit and pheromone representation. Cell. 2007;128:1187–1203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Ito K, Suzuki K, Estes P, Ramaswami M, Yamamoto D, Strausfeld NJ. The organization of extrinsic neurons and their implications in the functional roles of the mushroom bodies in Drosophila melanogaster meigen. Learn Mem. 1998;5:52–77. [PubMed]
13. Tanaka NK, Asasaki T, Shimada T, Ito K. Integration of chemosensory pathways in the Drosophila secondorder olfactory centers. Curr Biol. 2004;14:449–457. [PubMed]
14. Budick S, Dickinson M. Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:3001–3017. [PubMed]
15. Eberl DF, Boekhoff-Falk G. Development of Johnston’s organ in Drosophila. Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51:679–687. [PubMed]
16. Budick S, Reiser MB, Dickinson M. The role of visual and mechanosensory cues in structuring forward flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:4092–4103. [PubMed]
17. Todi SV, Sharma Y, Eberl DF. Anatomical and molecular design of the Drosophila antenna as a flagellar auditory organ. Microsc Res Tech. 2004;63:388–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Kamikouchi A, Shimada T, Ito K. Comprehensive classification of the auditory sensory projections in the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Neurol. 2006;499:317–356. [PubMed]
19. Burdohan JA, Comer CM. Cellular organization of an antennal mechanosensory pathway in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5830–5843. [PubMed]
20. Ye S, Comer CM. Correspondence of escape-turning behavior with activity of descending mechanosensory interneurons in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5844–5853. [PubMed]
21. Hartenstein V. Sink Helen., editor. The muscle pattern of Drosophila. 2006 Landes Biosciences / Eurekah.com Springer Science + Business Media ISBN: 0-387-30053-30058.
22. Kloppenburg P. Anatomy of the antennal motoneurons in the brain of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) J Comp Neurol. 1995;363:333–343. [PubMed]
23. Homberg V, Montague RA, Hildebrand JG. Anatomy of antenno-cerebral pathways in the brain of the Sphinx Moth, Manduca sexta. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;254:255–281. [PubMed]
24. Vickers NJ. Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. Biol. Bull. 2000;198:203–212. [PubMed]
25. David CT. Compensation for height in the control of groundspeed by Drosophila in a new ‘barber’s pole’ wind tunnel. J. Comp Physiol. 1982;147:485–493.
26. Frye MA, Dickinson MH. Motor output reflects the linear superposition of visual and olfactory inputs in Drosophila. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:123–131. [PubMed]
27. Frye MA, Tarsitano M, Dickinson MH. Odor localization requires visual feedback during free flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:843–855. [PubMed]
28. Maronde U. Common projection areas of antennal and visual pathways in the honeybee brain, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol. 1991;309:328–340. [PubMed]
29. Strausfeld NJ, Sinakevitch I, Okamura JY. Organization of local interneurons in optic glomeruli of the dipterous visual system and comparisons with the antennal lobes. Dev Neurobiol. 2007;67:1267–1288. [PubMed]
30. Chow DM, Frye MA. Context-dependent olfactory enhancement of optomotor flight control in Drosophila. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:2478–2485. [PubMed]
31. Guo FZ, Guo AK. Crossmodal interactions between olfactory and visual learning in Drosophila. Science. 2005;309:307–310. [PubMed]

Articles from Communicative & Integrative Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis