Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Genes Immun. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2880217

Multiple sclerosis susceptibility alleles in African Americans


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease characterized by complex genetics and multifaceted gene-environment interactions. Compared to whites, African Americans have a lower risk for developing MS, but African Americans with MS have a greater risk of disability. These differences between African Americans and whites may represent differences in genetic susceptibility and/or environmental factors. SNPs from 12 candidate genes have recently been identified and validated with MS risk in white populations. We performed a replication study using 918 cases and 656 unrelated controls to test whether these candidate genes are also associated with MS risk in African Americans. CD6, CLEC16a, EVI5, GPC5, and TYK2 contained SNPs that are associated with MS risk in the African American dataset. EVI5 showed the strongest association outside the MHC (rs10735781, OR = 1.233, 95% CI = 1.06–1.43, P value = 0.006). In addition, RGS1 appears to affect age of onset whereas TNFRSF1A appears to be associated with disease progression. None of the tested variants showed results that were statistically in-consistent with the effects established in whites. The results are consistent with shared disease genetic mechanisms among individuals of European and African ancestry.


Multiple sclerosis (MS, OMIM 126200) is the most common cause of non-traumatic chronic neurological disability in young adults.1 The incidence of MS seems to have increased considerably over the last century,2 but ancestry remains an important modifier of the global burden of MS; disease prevalence is substantially higher in populations of northern European decent. Other populations, including Asians, Africans, and North and South Amerindians, have a pronounced lower frequency of MS.3 Although African Americans have a higher disease risk compared to black Africans, they have a lower relative risk compared to northern Europeans and white Americans (relative risk of 0.64).4 On the other hand, African Americans with MS appear to have a greater risk of ambulatory disability and more often have symptoms restricted to the spinal cord and optic nerve compared to white patients.510 The differences in the clinical phenotype between African Americans and whites with MS may be due to the influence of genetic and/or environmental factors.

MS is a prototypic multifactorial disease with a complex genetic component. Multiple studies yielded convincing evidence for the presence of a major susceptibility gene or genes in the MHC locus on chromosome 6p21.3, but also indicated a polygenic mode of inheritance with each non-MHC gene contributing only a modest effect to the overall risk.11 Spearheaded by the recent remarkable progress in high-throughput genotyping technologies, hypothesis-neutral genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in MS led to the identification of true susceptibility genes and loci of interest, including CD25 Antigen (CD25), CD58 Antigen (CD58), C-type lectin domain family 16, member A (CLEC16a). Interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (IL2RA). Interleukin-7 receptor (IL7R), Glypican 5 (GPC5), Regulator of G protein signaling 1 (RGS1) and Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2).1214 A meta-analysis of GWAS data identified additional susceptibility SNPs in or next to Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A), Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) and CD6 antigen (CD6).15 The distribution and penetrance of these genetic variations in non-white MS groups is unknown.

In African Americans, previous studies have demonstrated the association of MHC class II HLA-DRB1*15 alleles with disease susceptibility and progression.16, 17 In addition, the presence of HLA-DRB1*15 alleles in African American patients correlates with the disseminated MS phenotype compared to opticospinal MS.18 However, the HLA effect in disease risk may not be as strong as in whites, suggesting a more prominent role for non-HLA genes. To better describe the MS susceptibility genetic profile in African Americans, the objectives of this study were to confirm in this population the previously identified susceptibility genes in whites affected with MS and to test whether these genes are associated with disease phenotypes. We tested, in 918 well characterized cases and 656 controls, the allele frequencies of 19 SNPs in 12 MS loci.1315, 19, 20 CD6, CLEC16a, Ecotropic viral integration site 5 (EVI5), GPC5, and TYK2 contained SNPs that are significantly associated with MS in African Americans. In addition, a preliminary analysis suggests that RGS1 may be associated with age of onset, whereas TNFRSF1A may affect disease severity.


The African American dataset used in this study is comprised of 918 cases and 656 controls. Baseline clinical characteristics of this dataset are listed in Table 1. The female to male ratio in cases was 3.7:1 and 2.4:1 in controls. The gender ratios are significantly different (χ2, P = 0.0002). Gender, therefore, is fit into the model for all subsequent analyses, thus minimizing the effect of this difference. The average age of onset of MS was 32.4 years and the mean age at time of analysis was 44 years for cases and 43 years for controls (t test, P = 0.081). The majority of the cases (85%) had either relapsing remitting or secondary progressive MS. We genotyped all individuals for the presence of DRB1*1501 or *1503, since these alleles are associated with MS in African Americans.16, 17 DRB1*1501 and *1503 are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Pearson’s χ2 test, P =0.26).

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of study participants.

We used logistic regression analysis to test 19 SNPs in 12 genes, previously identified in MS datasets of northern European ancestry, for association with MS in African Americans (Table 2). The average genotyping failure rate was 0.43% for all SNPs tested. None of the SNPs deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p > 10−2) in controls. Seven of the SNPs in five genes were significantly associated with MS in the African American dataset: CD6 rs11230563 (P= 0.012, OR= 1.203, 95% CI= 1.042–1.388), CLEC16a rs12708716 (P= 0.029, OR= 1.173, 95% CI= 1.016–1.357), CLEC16a rs6498169 (P= 0.028, OR= 1.142, 95% CI= 0.923–1.416), EVI5 rs10735781 (P= 0.006, OR= 1.233, 95% CI= 1.063–1.431), EVI5 rs6680578 (P= 0.025, OR= 1.185, 95% CI= 1.021–1.375), GPC5 rs553717 (P= 0.007, OR= 1.281, 95% CI= 1.025–1.602), and TYK2 rs34536443 (P=0.045, OR= 2.037). Due to the low minor allele frequency (0.01) of rs34536443, the results of this association may be inaccurate and warrant further testing. All P values are uncorrected, but we considered the present study as a replication of previously validated findings. Sex was not found to significantly interact with any of the SNPs tested. However, DRB1 status was found to possibly interact with EVI5 (rs10735781, P= 0.0493) and CD226 antigen (CD226) (rs763361, P= 0.0041) (Table 3). The minor alleles are susceptible for both SNPs in the DRB1 non-carriers group. A recent GWAS study performed using cases from Australia and New Zealand also identified the EVI5-DRB1 interaction.21

Table 2
Results from association analysis of MS risk.
Table 3
DRB1*15 stratified odds ratios for interacting loci.

Although most of the tested SNPs failed to show significant association in this dataset, those that were significant had slightly larger odds ratios when compared to previous studies in whites (Table 2 and Figure S1). However, none of the tested SNPs showed significant differences in a Cochrane heterogeneity Q test, signifying no difference in the association between African Americans and whites. Global association between MS and each SNP across the 2 populations, are also shown in Table 2.

Because the major MS susceptibility gene HLA-DRB1 was previously shown to affect some important aspects of the phenotype, we next tested the above 19 SNPs for association with age of onset and multiple sclerosis severity scale (MSSS) using linear regression analysis with relevant covariates placed in the model (Table 4). As expected, DRB1*1501/*1503 were significantly associated with age of onset (P = 7.496 × 10−7).18 Individuals with 0 copies of the DRB1 risk allele had a mean age of onset of 33.3 years. One copy of the DRB1 risk allele reduced the mean age of onset by 2.7 years and two copies of the DRB1 risk allele reduced the mean age of onset by 6.02 years. RGS1 may also influence the age of onset (P = 0.006). Individuals with two copies of the rs2760524 minor allele had a reduced mean age of onset of 23.0 years from 32.1 years. TNFRSF1A appears to modify MSSS metrics (P = 0.014). One copy of the TNFRSF1A minor allele reduced the mean MSSS by 0.86. With the exception of the HLA, none of these modifier associations survive statistical correction for multiple comparisons. Given the low prior odds that these SNPs are associated with MS phenotypes and the failure of these SNPs to survive correction for multiple comparisons, we consider this data to be preliminary and further testing will be necessary to confirm the association of RGS1 and TNFRSF1A to age of onset and MSSS, respectively.

Table 4
Genotype-Phenotype analysis in African Americans.


Previous studies have determined an association between HLA and MS in African Americans, albeit not as strong as in whites,16, 17 suggesting common immunological mechanisms underlying the diseases across ethnic backgrounds. In the present study, we report the first evidence of genetic association between non-HLA genes and MS risk in this population. CD6, CLEC16a, EVI5, GPC5, and TYK2 convincingly replicated in the African American dataset. On the other hand, CD226, CD58, IL7R, IL2R, IRF8, RGS1, TNFRSF1A failed to show evidence of association. Two primary explanations exist for this difference: first the study may have been underpowered to detect these associations, and second it is possible the different linkage disequilibrium patterns across populations may render the selected SNPs less effective in tagging putative causative variants in African Americans. It is also conceivable that some of the genes that influence MS in whites do not do so in African Americans.

With a sample size of 1574 African Americans, one would expect only some of the genetically relevant loci to show statistically significant evidence of association, even if an association exists. Also for a majority of the markers, the minor allele frequencies were lower in this African American dataset compared to previous studies in whites. Therefore, this study may have indeed been underpowered to detect associations for some of the SNPs. For example, the minor allele frequencies for SNPs such as rs12044852 (CD58, MAF 0.07), rs2104286 (IL2Ra, MAF 0.07), rs17445836 (IRF8, MAF 0.05), rs2760524 (RGS1, MAF 0.06), rs1800693 (TNFRSF1A, MAF 0.08), and rs34536443 (TYK2, MAF 0.01) are lower than in whites (all MAFs are greater than 0.1 in CEU, To illustrate this effect, power was plotted as a function of minor allele frequency (Supplementary Figure 2). For the SNPs, rs12720222 (TYK2), rs17445836 (IRF8), rs1800693 (TNFRSF1a), rs2816316 (RGS1), rs17424933 (CD6), rs34536443 (TYK2) and rs12044852 (CD58) the power to detect a true association in this dataset was low.

However, for SNPs rs2760524 (RGS1), rs2104286 (IL2Ra), rs6897932 (IL7Ra), rs763361 (CD226) and rs9533762 (GPC5) there appears to have been sufficient statistical power but an association was not identified. In addition, the linkage disequilibrium data in HapMap ( suggests that SNPs used to detect association may be less powerful in African Americans, and even if the association of a gene with MS is the same in African Americans and whites, significantly larger datasets may be needed. It should be noted, however, that very large datasets, currently only available for high-risk white populations, may be necessary to categorically exclude or replicate MS susceptibility markers.13 Based on US Census figures and the relative risk of MS, the current dataset represents an estimated 5% sample of African Americans with MS. It is plausible nevertheless, that differences in genetic susceptibility SNPs between whites and African Americans may represent true differences in disease heritability and that these SNPs do not influence MS risk in African Americans.

Of the genes associated with MS risk in African Americans, EVI5 displayed the most significant association outside the MHC. The association of EVI5 with MS was first detected in a GWAS performed using 12,360 non-Hispanic whites from the US and the UK, (SNPs rs10735781; OR=1.14, p = 3.35 × 10−4 and rs6680578; OR= 1.11, p =5.00 × 10−4).13 The association was confirmed through the analysis of 240 case-control individuals from a genetically isolated Dutch population (rs10735781; OR= 2.01, p = 0.01, and rs6680578 OR= 1.9, p = 0.01) and in a larger dataset comprised of 2825 individuals from multi-case Canadian families (rs10735781; OR= 1.15, p = 0.03; and rs6680578; OR= 1.15, p = 0.04).20 EVI5 is an oncogene implicated in T cell lymphomas, is a common site of retroviral integration22, and facilitates cell septation during mitosis.23 EVI5 has been shown to physically bind the small GTPase binding protein RAB11 in cell culture.24, 25 RAB11 is required for the endocytic recycling of cell surface molecules26 including transferrin,27 IgA,28 and CXCR2 chemokine receptors,29 and has also been implicated in the regulation of cytokinesis,30, 31 neurite extension,32 and the formation of the immune synapse.33 EVI5 competes with RAB effector proteins to bind with RAB11, which suggests a role for EVI5 regulation of downstream RAB11 pathways.25 In CD4+ T cells, Uncoordinated 119 (UNC119) activates RAB11 to transport Lymphocyte cell-specific protein-tyrosine kinase (LCK) to the plasma membrane.33 Upon binding of the antigen-MHC complex from the antigen presenting cell, LCK initiates signaling from the T cell receptor leading to T cell activation.34, 35 Allelic differences in EVI5 may contribute to altered function of RAB11 and altered formation of the immunological synapse, thus contributing to MS susceptibility. This hypothesis may explain the underlying genetic interaction between EVI5 and DRB1. Further studies will be needed to determine the functional effect of EVI5 allelic variants on RAB11 and the immune synapse.

CD6, CLEC16a, and GPC5 are also associated with MS risk in African Americans. CD6 is a T cell surface protein involved in the activation of T cells.36 Allelic variants at rs11230563 may result in altered activation of T cells, thereby affecting an individual’s susceptibility to MS. CLEC16a has been associated with disease susceptibility in white MS patients13, 15, 21, 37, 38 as well as other autoimmune diseases.3840 Although the function of CLEC16a is unknown, CLEC16a is expressed on B cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells.41 GPC5, a member of the glypican family, is a cell surface molecule and is a type of heparan sulfate proteoglycan.42 These molecules are implicated in axon guidance and growth, and synapse formation.43, 44 Interestingly, heparan sulfate proteoglycans have been identified in active MS brain lesions where they may contribute to the sequestering of proinflammatory cytokines.45 GPC5 is expressed in neurons46 and is known to interact with chemokines, extracellular matrix proteins, and growth factors.47 Allelic variants of GPC5 may affect neuronal repair and contribute to differences in MS susceptibility.

The RGS1 SNP, rs2760524, did not show evidence of association with MS risk in African Americans, but our preliminary analysis suggests an effect on age of onset that warrants follow-up in large northern-European datasets. RGS1 is involved in the trafficking of B cells into and out of lymph nodes.48 B cell-mediated antigen presentations and antibody responses appear to be necessary for the full development of demyelination, both in humans and in experimentally induced disease. B cells from RGS1 knockout mice have increased homing to lymph nodes, increased adhesion to lymph nodes, and faster movement within lymph nodes compared to wild-type B cells.48 In humans with MS, polymorphisms in RGS1 may conceivably lead to changes in B cell mobility, leading to altered recruitment of B cells to the central nervous system, thereby affecting the initiation of MS. Recent studies associated polymorphisms in RGS1 to Celiac disease and type I diabetes, further supporting a key role for RGS1 in the initiation and development of autoimmunity.4951

The association of TNFRSF1A-rs1800693 with MS was recently identified through a GWAS meta-analysis.15 The present data suggests that TNFRSF1A, one of the major receptors for TNF-α, which is involved in apoptosis, inflammation, and under certain conditions immunosuppression,52, 53 may also affect disease progression. Polymorphisms in TNFRSF1A may cause altered signaling of TNF-α in the CNS, leading to increased activation of T cells, demyelination and inflammation, thereby affecting the severity of MS.5457

In conclusion, in a large African American dataset we have tested a selected number of polymorphisms in candidate genes recently shown to be associated with MS in white populations. SNPs in CD6, CLEC16a, EVI5, GPC5, and TYK2 replicated the association with MS risk in African Americans. This is the first observation of an effect by non-HLA genes in a non-white MS group. The data is consistent with a commonality in disease mechanisms among individuals of European and African ancestry, and suggest the prominent role of environmental factors in explaining the paucity of MS in Africa.

Materials, subjects and methods

Study participants

The data set studied consisted of 1574 African American individuals, including 918 MS cases, and 656 unrelated control individuals. All study participants are self-reported African Americans, but European ancestry was documented in 985 of the individuals based on the genotyping of 186 SNPs highly informative for African versus European ancestry as previously described (mean European ancestry = 21%).58 All MS subjects met established diagnostic criteria.59 MS phenotypes were characterized by systematic chart review as described.7 Ascertainment protocols and clinical and demographic characteristics were summarized elsewhere.7, 17 Eight individuals with Aquaporin-4 seropositivity were excluded from this study as they have met new diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica.60 Informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to participation in the study.


Genotyping of SNPs was performed using validated TaqMan® SNP genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA) for all SNPs except rs9523762, which was performed using a custom TaqMan® SNP genotyping assay (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Each PCR reaction contained 10ng DNA, 1x; TaqMan® Genotyping Master Mix (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA), and 1xSNP assay (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Amplification was performed in an ABI 9700 GeneAmp® PCR system (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). The PCR program consisted of 95°C for 10min, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15s and 62°C for 1min. The plates were then read on an ABI prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System using SDS 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). For DRB1, a PCR locus-specific amplification was used as previously described.16 The average genotyping failure rate was 0.43% for all SNPs tested.

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics in table 1 were performed using R v2.8.1 ( All SNP genotypes were tested for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in cases and controls using SNP Stats ( To determine SNP associations with MS risk, logistic regression was performed using SAS v.9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) with sex and DRB1 status as covariates in the regression model. Positive DRB1 status was defined as at least one copy of either the DRB1*1501 or *1503 allele. Two statistical models were tested for each SNP and DRB1*1501/*1503. The genotypic model tested the dominant/recessive/additive allele model and the trend model tested additive allelic effects for each SNP. The model that best fit the data is reported. Since this is a replication study, uncorrected P values are reported. SNP interactions with gender and DRB1 status were tested using SNP Stats ( The Cochrane Heterogeneity Q test was performed using the rmeta package in R. The Q test measures the existence of differences between the individual study effects and the pooled effect across studies. The global odds ratio was calculated under a fixed effect model using the inverse variance weighting method.

Genotype-phenotype correlations were tested for age of onset and MSSS. Linear regression was performed using SAS v.9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). For age of onset, the data followed a normal distribution and was not transformed. For all SNPs tested, gender and DRB1 status were covariates in the linear regression model. For DRB1, only gender was fit into the model. For MSSS, the data was transformed using the “normal score transformation” (yi=[var phi]−1(ri−3/8)/(n+1/4)) to yield a normally distributed dependent variable for regression analysis.62 Gender, age of onset, and treatment status (Y/N/unknown) were fit into the linear regression model for all SNPs and DRB1. Uncorrected P values are reported.

Supplementary Material


We thank the MS patients and controls that participated in this study. We thank R.R. Lincoln, R. Guerrero, H. Mousavi, and A. Santaniello for sample and database management. We thank R. Gomez for recruitment of participants. We also thank J. McElroy for insightful discussions. This work was funded by grants from the National Institute of Health (R01 NS046297) and National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG3060C8). PLD is a Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar Award of the National MS Society.


Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available at Genes and Immunity’s website.


1. Hauser SLaG DS. Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. In: Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AD, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, editors. Harrsion's principle of internal medicine. 16th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. pp. 2461–2471.
2. Orton SM, Herrera BM, Yee IM, Valdar W, Ramagopalan SV, Sadovnick AD, et al. Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in Canada: a longitudinal study. Lancet neurology. 2006;5(11):932–936. [PubMed]
3. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci. 2001;22(2):117–139. [PubMed]
4. Wallin MT, Page WF, Kurtzke JF. Multiple sclerosis in US veterans of the Vietnam era and later military service: race, sex, and geography. Annals of neurology. 2004;55(1):65–71. [PubMed]
5. Buchanan RJ, Martin RA, Wang S, Kim M. Racial analyses of longer-stay nursing home residents with multiple sclerosis. Ethnicity & disease. 2006;16(1):159–165. [PubMed]
6. Buchanan RJ, Martin RA, Zuniga M, Wang S, Kim M. Nursing home residents with multiple sclerosis: comparisons of African American residents to white residents at admission. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2004;10(6):660–667. [PubMed]
7. Cree BA, Khan O, Bourdette D, Goodin DS, Cohen JA, Marrie RA, et al. Clinical characteristics of African Americans vs Caucasian Americans with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;63(11):2039–2045. [PubMed]
8. Marrie RA, Cutter G, Tyry T, Vollmer T, Campagnolo D. Does multiple sclerosis-associated disability differ between races? Neurology. 2006;66(8):1235–1240. [PubMed]
9. Naismith RT, Trinkaus K, Cross AH. Phenotype and prognosis in African-Americans with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective chart review. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2006;12(6):775–781. [PubMed]
10. Weinstock-Guttman B, Jacobs LD, Brownscheidle CM, Baier M, Rea DF, Apatoff BR, et al. Multiple sclerosis characteristics in African American patients in the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2003;9(3):293–298. [PubMed]
11. Oksenberg JR, Baranzini SE, Sawcer S, Hauser SL. The genetics of multiple sclerosis: SNPs to pathways to pathogenesis. Nature reviews. 2008;9(7):516–526. [PubMed]
12. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Burton PR, Clayton DG, Cardon LR, Craddock N, Deloukas P, et al. Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants. Nature genetics. 2007;39(11):1329–1337. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Hafler DA, Compston A, Sawcer S, Lander ES, Daly MJ, et al. Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genome-wide study. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357(9):851–862. [PubMed]
14. Baranzini SE, Wang J, Gibson RA, Galwey N, Naegelin Y, Barkhof F, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis. Human molecular genetics. 2009;18(4):767–778. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. De Jager PL, Jia X, Wang J, de Bakker PI, Ottoboni L, Aggarwal NT, et al. Meta-analysis of genome scans and replication identify CD6, IRF8 and TNFRSF1A as new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci. Nature genetics. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Caillier SJ, Briggs F, Cree BA, Baranzini SE, Fernandez-Vina M, Ramsay PP, et al. Uncoupling the roles of HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DRB5 genes in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 2008;181(8):5473–5480. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Oksenberg JR, Barcellos LF, Cree BA, Baranzini SE, Bugawan TL, Khan O, et al. Mapping multiple sclerosis susceptibility to the HLA-DR locus in African Americans. American journal of human genetics. 2004;74(1):160–167. [PubMed]
18. Cree BA, Reich DE, Khan O, De Jager PL, Nakashima I, Takahashi T, et al. Modification of Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypes by African Ancestry at HLA. Archives of neurology. 2009;66(2):226–233. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Ban M, Goris A, Lorentzen AR, Baker A, Mihalova T, Ingram G, et al. Replication analysis identifies TYK2 as a multiple sclerosis susceptibility factor. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Hoppenbrouwers IA, Aulchenko YS, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM, et al. EVI5 is a risk gene for multiple sclerosis. Genes and immunity. 2008;9(4):334–337. [PubMed]
21. Australia and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Bahlo M, Booth DR, Broadley SA, Brown MA, Foote SJ, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci on chromosomes 12 and 20. Nature genetics. 2009
22. Liao X, Buchberg AM, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Evi-5, a common site of retroviral integration in AKXD T-cell lymphomas, maps near Gfi-1 on mouse chromosome 5. Journal of virology. 1995;69(11):7132–7137. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Faitar SL, Sossey-Alaoui K, Ranalli TA, Cowell JK. EVI5 protein associates with the INCENP-aurora B kinase-survivin chromosomal passenger complex and is involved in the completion of cytokinesis. Experimental cell research. 2006;312(12):2325–2335. [PubMed]
24. Dabbeekeh JT, Faitar SL, Dufresne CP, Cowell JK. The EVI5 TBC domain provides the GTPase-activating protein motif for RAB11. Oncogene. 2007;26(19):2804–2808. [PubMed]
25. Westlake CJ, Junutula JR, Simon GC, Pilli M, Prekeris R, Scheller RH, et al. Identification of Rab11 as a small GTPase binding protein for the Evi5 oncogene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(4):1236–1241. [PubMed]
26. Ullrich O, Reinsch S, Urbe S, Zerial M, Parton RG. Rab11 regulates recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome. The Journal of cell biology. 1996;135(4):913–924. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Green EG, Ramm E, Riley NM, Spiro DJ, Goldenring JR, Wessling-Resnick M. Rab11 is associated with transferrin-containing recycling compartments in K562 cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1997;239(2):612–616. [PubMed]
28. Wang X, Kumar R, Navarre J, Casanova JE, Goldenring JR. Regulation of vesicle trafficking in madin-darby canine kidney cells by Rab11a and Rab25. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275(37):29138–29146. [PubMed]
29. Fan GH, Lapierre LA, Goldenring JR, Sai J, Richmond A. Rab11-family interacting protein 2 and myosin Vb are required for CXCR2 recycling and receptor-mediated chemotaxis. Molecular biology of the cell. 2004;15(5):2456–2469. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Fielding AB, Schonteich E, Matheson J, Wilson G, Yu X, Hickson GR, et al. Rab11-FIP3 and FIP4 interact with Arf6 and the exocyst to control membrane traffic in cytokinesis. The EMBO journal. 2005;24(19):3389–3399. [PubMed]
31. Wilson GM, Fielding AB, Simon GC, Yu X, Andrews PD, Hames RS, et al. The FIP3-Rab11 protein complex regulates recycling endosome targeting to the cleavage furrow during late cytokinesis. Molecular biology of the cell. 2005;16(2):849–860. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Saita S, Shirane M, Natume T, Iemura S, Nakayama KI. Promotion of neurite extension by protrudin requires its interaction with vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284(20):13766–13777. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Gorska MM, Liang Q, Karim Z, Alam R. Uncoordinated 119 protein controls trafficking of Lck via the Rab11 endosome and is critical for immunological synapse formation. J Immunol. 2009;183(3):1675–1684. [PubMed]
34. Molina TJ, Kishihara K, Siderovski DP, van Ewijk W, Narendran A, Timms E, et al. Profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking p56lck. Nature. 1992;357(6374):161–164. [PubMed]
35. Straus DB, Weiss A. Genetic evidence for the involvement of the lck tyrosine kinase in signal transduction through the T cell antigen receptor. Cell. 1992;70(4):585–593. [PubMed]
36. Hassan NJ, Simmonds SJ, Clarkson NG, Hanrahan S, Puklavec MJ, Bomb M, et al. CD6 regulates T-cell responses through activation-dependent recruitment of the positive regulator SLP-76. Molecular and cellular biology. 2006;26(17):6727–6738. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. The expanding genetic overlap between multiple sclerosis and type I diabetes. Genes and immunity. 2009;10(1):11–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Zoledziewska M, Costa G, Pitzalis M, Cocco E, Melis C, Moi L, et al. Variation within the CLEC16A gene shows consistent disease association with both multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes in Sardinia. Genes and immunity. 2009;10(1):15–17. [PubMed]
39. Awata T, Kawasaki E, Tanaka S, Ikegami H, Maruyama T, Shimada A, et al. Association of type 1 diabetes with two Loci on 12q13 and 16p13 and the influence coexisting thyroid autoimmunity in Japanese. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2009;94(1):231–235. [PubMed]
40. Marquez A, Varade J, Robledo G, Martinez A, Mendoza JL, Taxonera C, et al. Specific association of a CLEC16A/KIAA0350 polymorphism with NOD2/CARD15(−) Crohn's disease patients. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Robinson MJ, Sancho D, Slack EC, LeibundGut-Landmann S. Reis e Sousa C. Myeloid C-type lectins in innate immunity. Nature immunology. 2006;7(12):1258–1265. [PubMed]
42. Veugelers M, Vermeesch J, Reekmans G, Steinfeld R, Marynen P, David G. Characterization of glypican-5 and chromosomal localization of human GPC5, a new member of the glypican gene family. Genomics. 1997;40(1):24–30. [PubMed]
43. Lee JS, Chien CB. When sugars guide axons: insights from heparan sulphate proteoglycan mutants. Nature reviews. 2004;5(12):923–935. [PubMed]
44. Van Vactor D, Wall DP, Johnson KG. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans and the emergence of neuronal connectivity. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2006;16(1):40–51. [PubMed]
45. van Horssen J, Bo L, Dijkstra CD, de Vries HE. Extensive extracellular matrix depositions in active multiple sclerosis lesions. Neurobiology of disease. 2006;24(3):484–491. [PubMed]
46. Chernousov MA, Rothblum K, Stahl RC, Evans A, Prentiss L, Carey DJ. Glypican-1 and alpha4(V) collagen are required for Schwann cell myelination. J Neurosci. 2006;26(2):508–517. [PubMed]
47. Worapamorn W, Haase HR, Li H, Bartold PM. Growth factors and cytokines modulate gene expression of cell-surface proteoglycans in human periodontal ligament cells. Journal of cellular physiology. 2001;186(3):448–456. [PubMed]
48. Han SB, Moratz C, Huang NN, Kelsall B, Cho H, Shi CS, et al. Rgs1 and Gnai2 regulate the entrance of B lymphocytes into lymph nodes and B cell motility within lymph node follicles. Immunity. 2005;22(3):343–354. [PubMed]
49. Hunt KA, Zhernakova A, Turner G, Heap GA, Franke L, Bruinenberg M, et al. Newly identified genetic risk variants for celiac disease related to the immune response. Nature genetics. 2008;40(4):395–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Romanos J, Barisani D, Trynka G, Zhernakova A, Bardella MT, Wijmenga C. Six new coeliac disease loci replicated in an Italian population confirm association with coeliac disease. Journal of medical genetics. 2009;46(1):60–63. [PubMed]
51. Smyth DJ, Plagnol V, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Downes K, Yang JH, et al. Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;359(26):2767–2777. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Probert L, Eugster HP, Akassoglou K, Bauer J, Frei K, Lassmann H, et al. TNFR1 signalling is critical for the development of demyelination and the limitation of T-cell responses during immune-mediated CNS disease. Brain. 2000;23(Pt 10):2005–2019. [PubMed]
53. Kassiotis G, Kollias G. Uncoupling the proinflammatory from the immunosuppressive properties of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at the p55 TNF receptor level: implications for pathogenesis and therapy of autoimmune demyelination. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2001;193(4):427–434. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. The Lenercept Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. TNF neutralization in MS: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Neurology. 1999;53(3):457–465. [PubMed]
55. Fromont A, De Seze J, Fleury MC, Maillefert JF, Moreau T. Inflammatory demyelinating events following treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor. Cytokine. 2009;45(2):55–57. [PubMed]
56. Mohan N, Edwards ET, Cupps TR, Oliverio PJ, Sandberg G, Crayton H, et al. Demyelination occurring during anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2001;44(12):2862–9286. [PubMed]
57. Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR. Onset of multiple sclerosis associated with anti-TNF therapy. Neurology. 2001;57(10):1885–1888. [PubMed]
58. Patterson N, Hattangadi N, Lane B, Lohmueller KE, Hafler DA, Oksenberg JR, et al. Methods for high-density admixture mapping of disease genes. American journal of human genetics. 2004;74(5):979–1000. [PubMed]
59. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 2001;50(1):121–127. [PubMed]
60. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2006;66(10):1485–1489. [PubMed]
61. Sole X, Guino E, Valls J, Iniesta R, Moreno V. SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006;22(15):1928–1929. [PubMed]
62. Blom G. Statistical estimates and transformed beta-variables. New York: Wiley; 1958.