Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Inorg Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 6.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2878390

Isolation and Structural Characterization of Two Very Large, and Largely Empty, Endohedral Fullerenes: Tm@C3v-C94 and Ca@C3v-C94


The structures of two newly synthesized endohedral fullerenes - Tm@C3v-C94 and Ca@C3v-C94 - have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction on samples co-crystallized with NiII(octaethylporphyrin). Both compounds exhibit the same cage geometry and conform to the isolated pentagon rule (IPR). The metal ions within these rather large cages are localized near one end and along the C3 axis. While the calcium ion is situated over a C-C bond at a 6:6 ring junction, the thulium ion is positioned above a six-membered ring of the fullerene.


The chemistry of fullerenes is not confined to C60 and C70 but also includes much larger cages. Fullerenes are generally prepared by vaporization of graphite in an electric arc in a low-pressure atmosphere.1 Under these conditions, C60 and C70 are the dominant products. However, larger, all-carbon clusters with even numbers of atoms up to C500 have been successfully extracted from the carbon soot produced by the arcing process.2,3 Empty fullerene cages obey the isolated pentagon rule (IPR), which requires that each of the twelve pentagons in the carbon cage be surrounded by hexagons.4 For C60 there is only one isomer that satisfies the IPR, and similar situation pertains for C70. But as the size of the fullerene cage increases, the possibilities for the existence of multiple isomers also increase. Thus, for C80 there are 7 isomeric structures that conform to the IPR, for C90 there are 46 such isomers, and for C100 there are 450 possible isomers.

Endohedral fullerenes with carbon cage sizes of 80, 82 and 84 atoms have received extensive study in recent years.5 With the development of endohedral fullerenes encapsulating M3N units, of which Sc3N@Ih-C80 is the prototypical example,6 there has been a concerted effort to determine the range of sizes of carbon cages that can surround these M3N units.7,8,9 Particular attention has been paid to the effect of metal ions size in determining the cage size for endohedral fullerenes of the M3N@C2n class. In that regard, Echegoyen and coworkers have observed that large metal ions like cerium favor the formation of large cages with species as large as Ce3N@C104 detectable by mass spectroscopy.10,11 Some of the largest endohedral fullerenes to be fully structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction - Tb3N@D2(35)-C88 and Tb3N@ D3(19)-C86 - belong to this M3N@C2n class.

While considerable efforts have gone into expanding the number of endohedral fullerenes of the M3N@C2n class, there also has been significant development in expanding the range and sizes of endohedrals containing other atomic groupings as well. Recently, the detection of an extensive family of di-gadolinium endohedrals that extends from Gd2C90 to Gd2C124 has been reported and the structure of one of these, Gd2C2@D3(85)-C92, has been established crystallographically.12 Prior to the work reported here, Gd2C2@D3(85)-C92 involved the largest fullerene cage whose structure has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

There also has been significant development in detecting large endohedrals containing just a single metal ion. For example, several calcium containing endohedral fullerenes have been isolated including: Ca@C60,13 Ca@C72,14 Ca@C74,13 Ca@C76, 15 four isomers of Ca@C82,16,17,18, two isomers of Ca@C84,14 Ca@C88,13 and two isomers of Ca@C90.13 Here, we report the preparation, isolation and structural characterization of a new calcium-containing endohedral Ca@C3v-C94. Endohedral fullerenes containing only a single metal ion are frequently encountered during the preparation of endohedrals of the trimetallic nitride - M3N@C2n - class. The incorporation a number of different lanthanide ions into endofullerenes allows the preparation of molecules with a wide, but controllable, variation in properties and potential uses.19,20 For example, thulium compounds are luminescent and paramagnetic. Thus, there is current interest in using thulium compounds in developing new lasers21 and in magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.22 The preparations and crystallographic characterization of the thulium-containing endohedrals, Tm3N@Ih-C80,23 Tm3N@D5h-C80, and Tm3N@Cs(51365)-C84,24 have recently been reported. The procedure responsible for the formation of these thulium-containing trimetallic nitride endohedrals also produces Tm@C3v-C94. Here, we shall compare the properties and structures of Ca@C3v-C94 and Tm@C3v-C94.


Preparation and Purification of Ca@C3v-C94

Carbon soot containing Ca@C3v-C94 was obtained by the DC arc vaporization of graphite rods filled with CaO/graphite powder (1:80 atomic ratio). The soluble fullerenes were extracted from the soot, and two isomers, Ca@C94(I) and Ca@C94(II), were separated via multiple stages of chromatography. Relevant HPLC chromatograms from the purification process are shown in the Supporting Information. The major isomer was the more rapidly eluting Ca@C94(I) with a retention time of 27 min. on a Buckyprep-M column with toluene as the mobile phase at flow rate of 4.5 mL/min. Insufficient quantities of the minor isomer, Ca@C94(II) with a retention time of 34 min. under similar conditions, were obtained to allow crystallization and structural characterization. The mass spectrum of the purified Ca@C94(I) is shown in Figure 1. A sample of Ca@C94(I) was co-crystallized with Ni(OEP) and utilized in the crystallographic work. This procedure allowed us to identify Ca@C94(I) as Ca@C3v-C94.

Figure 1
Laser desorption time of flight mass spectrum of Ca@C3v-C94. A, an expansion of the experimental spectrum. B, calculated isotope distributions for Ca@C94.

The Structure of Ca@C3v-C94·Ni(OEP)·2(CH3C6H5)

Although there is disorder in this structure, the features of the major orientation are particularly well determined. In the major orientation, the cage resides with the crystallographic mirror plane coincident with one of the mirror planes of the endohedral fullerene. The total fractional occupancy of this orientation is 0.64. There is also one calcium ion site located on this mirror plane, and it, too, has 0.64 total occupancy. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the nickel porphyrin and the endohedral fullerene in the major orientation, while Figure 3 presents two orthogonal views Ca@C3v-C94 alone.

Figure 2
A view showing the orientation of the endohedral Ca@C3v-C94 and the nickel porphyrin in crystalline Ca@C3v-C94·Ni(OEP)·2(CH3C6H5). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50 % level.
Figure 3
Two orthogonal views of Ca@C3v-C94. A, a view down the non-crystallographic three-fold axis of the carbon cage. B, a side view with the three-fold axis denoted by the horizontal, dashed line.

The crystallographic work clearly shows that the fullerene cage has C3v symmetry. For a carbon cage with 94 atoms, there are 134 isomers that obey the isolated pentagon rule (IPR). Among these, only one, the one found in Ca@C3v-C94, has C3v symmetry; all of the others have lower symmetry.

Remarkably, in the major orientation there is only a single position for the calcium ion, which is located over one of the 6:6 ring junctions that radiate from the C3 axis. Figure 4 presents some details regarding the location of the calcium ion. The closest Ca-C distances are 2.358(8) and 2.445(7) Å. These distances are significantly shorter than the Ca-C distances in traditional calcium containing organometallic molecules. A search of the Cambridge Crystallographic Database reveals that the Ca-C distances in complexes containing the Ca(C5H5-nRn)2 fragment range from 2.574 to 2.865 Å with a mean distance of 2.678 Å. For example, in (η5-C5Me5)2Ca the average Ca-C distance is reported to be 2.64(2) Å.25 This shortening of the Ca-C distances in Ca@C3v-C94 may result from the unusual nature of the calcium ion coordination in Ca@C3v-C94. The calcium ion makes contact with the fullerene along one side only, the rest of the [C94]2− ion is devoid of any interaction with the metal ion.

Figure 4
Drawings showing the location of the (A) calcium ion relative to the neighboring carbon atoms in Ca@C3v-C94 and (B) the thulium ion in Tm@C3v-C94.

In addition to the major orientation, there are two other, symmetry-related minor orientations with 0.18 fractional occupancies for the cage. In these locations the crystallographic mirror plane is not coincident with a mirror plane of the fullerene cage. Likewise, there are two other sites for the calcium ion on opposite sides of the mirror plane with 0.18 fractional occupancy of each site. As with the major orientation, the calcium ions in the minor orientations also lie over a pair of carbon atoms at a 6:6 ring junction of the cage.

Electronic Structure Computations for Ca@C3v-C94

The electronic distribution for calcium-containing endohedral fullerenes may be represented by an ionic model, Ca2+@(C2n)2−. This formulation requires that two electrons be transferred to the carbon cage. These electrons will fill the LUMO orbital(s) of the corresponding empty fullerene cage. Poblet and coworkers have proposed that the stability of various isomeric cages for a particular cage size can be estimated from computations of the empty cages. For endohedrals encapsulating (M3N)6+ units, they proposed that a large (LUMO-4)-(LUMO-3) gap in the corresponding empty cage would provide a large HOMO-LUMO gap in the corresponding hexa-anion.26,27 Similarly, the most stable endohedral fullerene encapsulating (M2C2)4+ units would be expected to have the largest (LUMO-3)-(LUMO-2) gap in the corresponding neutral fullerene.28 Consequently, for Ca@C94 we explored the magnitude of the (LUMO-2)-(LUMO-1) gaps for empty cage C94. Table 1 shows relevant computational results. The first column shows the ten neutral C94 isomers with the largest (LUMO-2)-(LUMO-1) gaps. Of these ten, C3v-C94 has the largest gap. The molecular orbital energies for the frontier orbitals for C3v-C94, which has a triplet ground state, are shown in Figure 5 along with the orbital energies for the corresponding dianion. Computations were also performed to determine the relative stabilities of the dianions of the empty cage C94, as done previously by Popov and Dunsch for other endohedrals.29 Table 1 show the values of ΔE and the HOMO-LUMO gaps for the ten most stable anions. In this situation, the most stable isomer is C2(124)-C94. The C3v-C94 isomer is the third most stable, although it still has the largest HOMO-LUMO gap. Additional computations were conducted on the entire molecule. These were restricted to examination of the 15 cage geometries that produced the most stable dianions. The results are shown in the final columns of Table 1. The C3v-C94 isomer emerges as the most stable, but the C1(132)-C94 isomer is very close in energy, only 0.002 eV less stable.

Figure 5
Molecular orbital energies (in eV) for neutral C3v-C94 and for the dianion, [C3v-C94]2
Table 1
Relative Energies (E, kJ/mol) and HOMO-LUMO Gaps (gap, eV) of the Most Stable Isomers of C94, C942−, and Ca@C94

The Preparation and Purification of Tm@C3v-C94

Core-drilled graphite rods packed with a mixture of Tm2O3, graphite powder, and iron nitride were vaporized in Krätschmer-Huffman arc-discharge fullerene generator as described previously.30 Extraction procedures and chromatographic purification, utilizing a cyclopentadiene functionalized Merrifield peptide resin column,31 also followed an established route.18,19 Figure 6 shows the mass spectrum of the purified product.

Figure 6
Negative ion mode LD-TOF mass spectrum of the pure Tm@C3v-C94. The insert panel is the experimental and theoretical isotopic distribution of Tm@C3v-C94.

Figure 7 shows the UV/vis absorption spectra of Ca@C3v-C94 and Tm@C3v-C94. The two spectra show some general similarity but also a number of distinct differences. The spectrum of Tm@C3v-C94 in particular is very similar to the spectrum reported previously for Yb@C94,32 and these two endohedral fullerenes are likely to have the same structure.

Figure 7
Absorption spectra. (A) Ca@C3v-C94 in benzene solution. (B) Tm@C3v-C94 in toluene solution.

The Structure of Tm@C3v-C94·2Ni(OEP)·3.65(C6H6)

Unlike all of the other endohedral fullerenes that have been cocrystallized with Ni(OEP), Tm@C3v-C94 forms crystals with a stoichiometry of two molecules of Ni(OEP) to one molecule of Tm@C3v-C94, rather than the usual stoichiometry of one molecule of the endohedral and one molecule of Ni(OEP).33 As a result, each molecule of Tm@C3v-C94 is surrounded by two molecules of Ni(OEP) as can be seen in Figure 8. This view shows the major orientation of the C94 cage and the three most abundant sites for the Tm ion. As is the case with the calcium endohedral, this thulium endohedral utilizes the unique C94 isomer with C3v symmetry. The two different porphyrin molecules exhibit different interactions with the fullerene. Both porphyrin molecules have low average deviations from planarity, as measured from the NiN4 plane, but the porphyrin containing Ni1 is slightly more planar. This porphyrin interacts with a relatively flat face of the endohedral fullerene. The porphyrin containing Ni2 interacts with a more pyramidalized area of the fullerene, and has the shorter NiN4 plane-to-ball distance, 2.855(3)Å.

Figure 8
A view showing the orientation of the endohedral Tm@C3v-C94 and the two nickel porphyrins in crystalline Tm@C3v-C94·2Ni(OEP)·3.65(C6H6). The fractional occupancies of the three Tm sites are: Tm1, 0.40; Tm2, 0.26; and Tm3, 0.21. For clarity, ...

Figure 9 shows two orthogonal views of Tm@C3v-C94 with the three major sites for the Tm ions shown. The C94 cage is disordered. Two orientations with occupancies of 0.5 and 0.4 were identified and refined. A third minor orientation may be present but the data were insufficient to allow it to be modeled. In addition to the three major sites for Tm ions, there are several sites with less than 0.1 occupancy. In the major cage orientation, the Tm ions are situated over the centers of six-membered rings as can be seen in Figure 4 for Tm1. Similar situations pertain for Tm2 and Tm3. This orientation of Tm ions over six-membered rings has been seen before for Tm3N@Ih-C80.18

Figure 9
Two orthogonal views of Tm@C3v-C94. A, a view down the non-crystallographic three-fold axis of the carbon cage. B, a side view with the three-fold axis in the horizontal direction. The major Tm site is shown in orange, while the other two prominent sites ...

In order to allow appreciation of the size of the C3v-C94 cage, Figure 10 shows drawings of C60 in C60·2ZnII(OEP)·CHCl323 and Tm@C3v-C94 in crystalline Tm@C3v-C94·2Ni(OEP)·3.65(C6H6) on the same scale. The larger size of Tm@C3v-C94 is readily apparent.

Figure 10
Drawings comparing the sizes of (A) C60 in C60·2ZnII(OEP) ·CHCl3 and (B) Tm@C3v-C94 in crystalline Tm@C3v-C94·2Ni(OEP) ·3.65(C6H6) with only the major Tm site shown. Only one porphyrin is shown for each structure.


At this time, Ca@C3v-C94 and Tm@C3v-C94 are the largest fullerenes that have been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Both obey the IPR. In each of these molecules, the preferred sites for the metal ions are positions near the site where the three-fold axis intersects the fullerene surface at a rather curved end. However, while the calcium ion prefers to lie above a single C-C bond, the thulium ion resides over a six-membered ring. This localization of the metal ions leaves a considerable amount of empty space, ca. 70 Å3, on the other side of the cage. In contrast to the M3N@C2n class of endohedrals, in which the internal cluster geometry partially dictates the relative positions of the metal and carbon atoms, the M@C2n class, with its internal simplicity, offers fewer constraints on the positioning of the metal atom. The localization of the metal ions seen for Ca@C3v-C94 and Tm@C3v-C94 also contrasts markedly with the metal ion placement in Er@C2v-C82 where there are 23 partially occupied sites for the erbium ions34 and in Er@C3v(8)-C82 where there are also erbium ions in 23 fractionally populated positions.35

The similarities in the structures of these two endohedral fullerenes suggest that they may have similar electronic structures. For Ca@C3v-C94, an ionic structure Ca2+[C94]2− is expected and has been utilized in our computational studies. For Tm@C3v-C94 the alternative structures are Tm2+[C94]2− or Tm3+[C94]3−. Compounds containing Tm2+ are now known for organometallic complexes36,37,38 and also for endohedral fullerenes.39 As an example of the latter, the three isomers of Tm@C82 have been formulated with the electronic distribution, Tm2+ [C82]2−.40,41 For Tm@C3v-C94, the use of the same C3v-C94 cage structure as found for the calcium compound suggests that the Tm2+[C94]2− electronic distribution is probable. However, the differences in the electronic spectra of Tm@C3v-C94 and Ca@C3v-C94 seen in Figure 6 and the different metal ion placements seen in Figure 4 suggest that the alternative formal electronic distribution, Tm3+[C94]3−, may contribute to a larger extent than is the case for Ca@C3v-C94.

Given the 134 IPR isomers available for a C94 cage and the possibility that a non-IPR cage could form as well, we find it remarkable that the procedures reported here for making Ca@ C3v-C94 and Tm@ C3v-C94 lead to the formation of the same cage isomer for both molecules.


Synthesis of Ca@C3v-C94

A 6 × 150 mm graphite rod filled with CaO/graphite powder (1:80 atomic ratio) was vaporized as the anode in a DC arc under optimized conditions.42 The raw soot that resulted was extracted repeatedly in o-dichlorobenzene with ultrasonication until the extract solution was colorless, without special nitrogen protection. After removing the solvent with a rotary evaporator, chlorobenzene was added to re-dissolve the dry powder. The extract was subjected to a four-stage HPLC isolation process that did not involve recycling.

The first, second and third steps were carried out on three complementary columns Buckyprep-M (with chlorobenzene as eluent), Buckyprep (with toluene as eluent) and 5PBB (10×250mm Nacalai Tesque, with xylene as eluant) at a flow rate of 4.5 mL/min. The final stage, which produced isomer-free Ca@C94, utilized a Buckyprep-M column with toluene as eluent.

The purity and composition of Ca@C94 was determined by laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LD-TOF-MS). UV-4100 spectrophotometer (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) was used to characterize its ultraviolet-visible-near infrared (UV-Vis-NIR) spectrum in benzene solvent.

Synthesis of Tm@C3v-C94

The core-drilled graphite rods (6.5 mm dia.) were packed with a mixture of Tm2O3, graphite powder, and iron nitride according to weight ratio of 2.1: 1.0: 0.4, respectively, and vaporized in Krätschmer-Huffman arc-discharge fullerene generator as described previously. The fullerene containing soot was collected in a thimble and extracted in a Soxhlet extractor using toluene as solvent for about 20 hours. The first stage of HPLC of the flash eluant from the chemical separation using a cyclopentadiene-functionalized Merrifield peptide resin (CPDE-MPR) revealed the presence of seven thulium-containing fractions on 5PBB column, similar to those of the terbium-based elution using same method. The sixth fraction contained Tm@C94 and Tm3N@C88. A pure sample of Tm@C94 was obtained from the second stage of HPLC using a 5PYE column.

Crystal Growth

Co-crystals of Tm@C3v-C94 and NiII(OEP) were obtained by layering a solution of ca. 0.5 mg of Tm@C3v-C94 in 0.5 mL benzene over a red benzene solution of NiII(OEP) in a glass tube. Over a 14 day period, the two solutions diffused together and black crystals formed. Co-crystals of Ca@C3v-C94 and NiII(OEP) were obtained by layering a saturated solution of NiII(OEP) in 0.5 mL toluene over a toluene solution of Ca@C3v-C94 in a glass tube.

Tm@C3v-C94·2 Ni(OEP) ·3.65 C6H6

A black needle of dimensions 0.12 × 0.03 × 0.02 mm3 was mounted in the 90(2) K nitrogen cold stream provided by an Oxford Cryostream low temperature apparatus on the goniometer head of a Bruker D85 diffractometer equipped with an ApexII CCD detector, on beamline 11.3.1 at the Advanced Light Source in Berkeley, CA. Diffraction data were collected using synchrotron radiation monochromated with silicon(111) to a wavelength of 0.77490(1). A full sphere of data was collected using 0.3° ω scans. A multi-scan absorption correction was applied using the program SADABS 2007/4.43 Upon inspection of scattering intensities, the data were truncated to 1 Å resolution, yielding 125844 reflections collected, of which 11978 were unique [R(int) = 0.0944] and 10015 were observed [I>2σ (I)]. The structure was solved by dual-space methods (SIR-2004)44 and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 (SHELXL97)31 using 1246 parameters. The experimental crystal is a merohedral twin that was treated using a 180° rotation about [1 1 0]. This treatment yielded a twin ratio of 52:48.

The C94 cage is disordered. Two orientations were identified and refined. The occupancies of these two cages were 0.5 and 0.4. At least one more orientation was present, but could not be modeled due to a deficit of data. Due to the overlap of cage orientations, distance restraints were used to control the cage geometries. The thulium atom within the C94 cage is disordered over numerous sites. Occupancies were initially determined by refinement and were subsequently fixed at their refined values. The structure was refined primarily isotropically due to the low data to parameter ratio. Only the thulium sites Tm1, Tm2 and Tm3 with occupancies of 0.40, 0.26, and 0.21, respectively, were refined anisotropically. The other thulium sites, which had occupancies less than 0.10, were refined isotropically. The hydrogen atoms on carbon atoms were generated geometrically and refined as riding atoms with C-H = 0.95–0.99 Å and Uiso(H) =1.2 times Ueq(C) for CH and CH2 groups and Uiso(H) =1.5 times Ueq(C) for CH3 groups. The maximum and minimum peaks in the final difference Fourier map were 2.013 and −0.676 eÅ−3. The maximum lies on a special position, and is probably an artifact of the twinning. Crystal data: C181H103N8Ni2Tm, Mw= 2676.01, tetragonal, I41/a, a = 25.672(4) Å, b = 25.672(4) Å, c = 69.62(2) Å, V= 45884(17) Å3, T= 90(2) K, Z= 16, R1 [I>2σ (I)] = 0.0934, wR2 (all data) = 0.2539, GOF (on F2) = 1.035.

Ca@C3v-C94·2 Ni(OEP) ·2 CH3C6H5

A black block of dimensions 0.24 × 0.34 × 0.46 mm3 was mounted in the 91(2) K nitrogen cold stream provided by Cryo Industries low temperature apparatus on the goniometer head of a Bruker SMART diffractometer equipped with an ApexII CCD detector. Data were collected with the use of MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). A multi-scan absorption correction was applied using the program SADABS 2008/1.31 A total of 56378 reflections were collected to 2θmax of 61°, of which 12968 were unique [R(int) = 0.0238] and 10427 were observed [I>2σ (I)]. The structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXS97) and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 (SHELXL97) using 1997 parameters.31 There are two orientations of the C94 cage in the structure. The first residue contains 51 C atoms, of which 8 reside on the crystallographic mirror plane. The second contains 94 C atoms, which comprise a ball that is disordered with respect to the crystallographic mirror plane. The coordinates of the second cage were adjusted by a rigid group refinement. This group was taken from the atoms (including those generated by symmetry) of the first cage. The major orientation is the first cage, with refined occupancy of 0.3204(15); the second cage has occupancy of 0.1796(15). There are two Ca atoms in the asymmetric unit, and due to their refined occupancies and positions, Ca1 was associated with the first ball and Ca2 was associated with the second. Ca1 was refined with anisotropic thermal parameters and Ca2 was kept isotropic. Carbon atoms of the first cage were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters while those of the second cage were kept isotropic. Similarity restraints of 0.02 Å2 were applied to the thermal parameters of the carbon cages and the two Ca atoms. There are two toluene sites in the structure, and they also exhibit some disorder with a total of 0.5 occupancy in each of the two sites.

The hydrogen atoms on carbon atoms were treated as for the Tm structure. The maximum and minimum peaks in the final difference Fourier map were 1.494 and −1.510 eÅ−3. Crystal data: C144H60CaN4Ni, Mw= 1944.75, monoclinic, C2/m, a = 25.740(5) Å, b = 15.106(3) Å, c = 21.320(4) Å, β = 96.77(3)°, V= 8232(3) Å3, T= 91(2) K, Z= 4, R1 [I>2σ (I)] = 0.0824, wR2 (all data) = 0.2521, GOF (on F2) = 1.035.

Supplementary Material




We thank the National Science Foundation [CHE-0716843 to ALB and MMO, CHE-0443850 (H.C.D.), DMR-0507083 (H.C.D.)] and the National Institute of Health [1R01-CA119371-01 (H.C.D.)] for support, the Advanced Light Source, supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, for beam time, and Dr. Simon J. Teat for assistance. We thank Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China for the mass spectrometry determinations. Hua Yang thanks Mudanjiang Normal College, Heilongjiang, China, for admission to full time graduate study.


Supporting Information Available: The HPLC chromatograms, UV-vis, and MS spectra of the purified samples of Ca@C3v-C94 and Tm@C3v-C94 are shown in the Supporting Information. X-ray crystallographic files in CIF format for Ca@C3v-C94·Ni(OEP)·2(CH3C6H5) and C3v-Tm@C94·2 Ni(OEP)·3.65 C6H6. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at


1. Krätschmer W, Lamb LD, Fostiropoulos K, Huffman DR. Nature. 1990;347:354.
2. Shinohara H, Sato H, Saito Y, Izuoka A, Sugawara T, Ito H, Sakurai T, Matsuo T. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1992;6:413.
3. Beer F, Gugel A, Martin K, Rader J, Mullen K. J Mater Chem. 1997;7:1327.
4. Fowler PW, Manolopoulos DE. An Atlas of Fullerenes. Clarendon Press; Oxford: 1995.
5. Akasaka T, Nagase S, editors. Endofullerenes: A New Family of Carbon Clusters. Springer; 2002.
6. Stevenson S, Rice G, Glass T, Harich K, Cromer F, Jordan MR, Craft J, Hadju E, Bible R, Olmstead MM, Maitra K, Fisher AJ, Balch AL, Dorn HC. Nature. 1999;401:55.
7. Yang S, Dunsch L. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:12320. [PubMed]
8. Yang S, Dunsch L. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:413. [PubMed]
9. Zuo T, Beavers CM, Duchamp JC, Campbell A, Dorn HC, Olmstead MM, Balch AL. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2035. [PubMed]
10. Chaur MN, Melin F, Elliott B, Kumbhar A, Athans AJ, Echegoyen L. Chem Eur J. 2008;14:4594. [PubMed]
11. Melin F, Chaur MN, Engmann S, Elliott B, Kumbhar A, Athans AJ, Echegoyen L. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:9032. [PubMed]
12. Yang H, Lu C, Liu Z, Jin H, Che Y, Olmstead MM, Balch AL. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:17296. [PubMed]
13. Wang LS, Alford JM, Chai Y, Diener M, Zhang J, McClure SM, Guo T, Scuseria GE, Smalley RE. Chem Phys Lett. 1993;207:354.
14. Wan TSM, Zhang HW, Nakane T, Xu Z, Inakuma M, Shinohara H, Kobayashi K, Nagase S. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:6806.
15. Zhang Y, Xu JX, Hao C, Shi ZJ, Gu ZN. Carbon. 2006;44:475.
16. Xu Z, Nakane T, Shinohara H. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:11309.
17. Slanina Z, Kobayashi K, Nagase S. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:3397. [PubMed]
18. Kodama T, Fujuu R, Miyake Y, Sakaguchi K, Nishikawa H, Ikemoto I, Kikuchi K, Achiba Y. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;377:197.
19. Dorn HC, Iezzi EB, Stevenson S, Balch AL, Duchamp JC. In: Endofullerenes: A New Family of Carbon Clusters. Akasaka T, Nagase S, editors. Kluwer; Dordrecht: 2002. pp. 121–129.
20. Dunsch L, Yang S. Small. 2007;3:1298. [PubMed]
21. Voron’ko Yu K, Zharikov EV, Lis DA, Popov AV, Smirnov VA, Subbotin KA, Khromov MN, Voronov VV. Optics Spect. 2008;105:538.
22. Suchy M, Li AX, Bartha R, Hudson RHE. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16:6156. [PubMed]
23. Zuo T, Olmstead MM, Beavers CM, Balch AL, Wang G, Yee GT, Shu C, Xu L, Elliott B, Echegoyen L, Duchamp JC, Dorn HC. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:5234. [PubMed]
24. Zuo T, Walker K, Olmstead MM, Melin F, Holloway BC, Echegoyen L, Dorn HC, Chaur MN, Chancellor CJ, Beavers CM, Balch AL, Athans AJ. Chem Commun. 2008:1067. [PubMed]
25. Williams RA, Hanusa TP, Huffman JC. Organometallics. 1990;9:1128.
26. Campanera JM, Bo C, Poblet JM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:7230. [PubMed]
27. Valencia R, Rodriguez-Fortea A, Poblet JM. Chem Comm. 2007:4161. [PubMed]
28. Valencia R, Rodriguez-Fortea A, Poblet JM. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112:4550–4555. [PubMed]
29. Popov AA, Dunsch L. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11835–11849. [PubMed]
30. Zuo T, Olmstead MM, Beavers CM, Balch AL, Wang G, Yee GT, Shu C, Xu L, Elliot B, Echegoyen L, Duchamp JC, Dorn HC. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:5234. [PubMed]
31. Ge Z, Duchamps JC, Cai T, Gibson HW, Dorn HC. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16292. [PubMed]
32. Xu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Gu Z. Chem Phys Lett. 2005;409:192.
33. However, C60 does form cocrystals with a 2:1, porphyrin:C60 stoichiometry: C60·2CoII(OEP)·CHCl3 and C60·2ZnII(OEP) ·CHCl3. Olmstead MM, Costa DA, Maitra K, Noll BC, Phillips SL, Van Calcar PM, Balch AL. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:7090.
34. Olmstead MM, de Bettencourt-Dias A, Stevenson S, Dorn HC, Balch AL. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:4172. [PubMed]
35. Olmstead MM, Lee HM, Stevenson S, Dorn HC, Balch AL. Chem Commun. 2002:2688. [PubMed]
36. Evans WJ, Allen NT, Ziller JW. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:359. [PubMed]
37. Jaroschik F, Nief F, Le Goff XF, Ricard L. Organometallics. 2007;26:3552.
38. Bochkarev MN. Coord Chem Rev. 2004;248:835.
39. Hino S, Wanita N, Iwasaki K, Yoshimura D, Ozawa N, Kodama T, Sakaguchi K, Nishikawa H, Ikemoto I, Kikuchi K. Chem Phys Lett. 2005;402:217.
40. Kirbach U, Dunsch L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1996;35:2380.
41. Kodama T, Ozawa N, Miyake Y, Sakaguchi K, Nishikawa H, Ikemoto I, Kikuchi K, Achiba Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:1452. [PubMed]
42. Sun DY, Liu ZY, Guo XH, Xu WG, Liu SY. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:3927.
43. Sheldrick GM. Acta Crystallographica Sect A. 2008;64:112. [PubMed]
44. Burla MC, Camalli M, Carrozzini B, Cascarano GL, Giacovazzo C, Polidori G, Spagna R. J Appl Cryst. 2003;36:1103.