Our studies provide insight into the
in vivo functions of mitochondrial fusion in mammals. Mitochondrial fusion plays an essential role in skeletal muscle fibers, in spite of its compact subcellular architecture and precise placement of mitochondria. In the absence of mitochondrial fusion, a pathological profile emerges that bears striking similarities to human mitochondrial myopathies, particularly those associated with mtDNA depletion syndromes (
Copeland, 2008).
Our studies indicate that mitochondrial fusion safeguards mtDNA function through three distinct pathways. First, mitochondrial dynamics maintains cellular health by stabilizing mtDNA copy number. In budding yeast, loss of the mitofusin Fzo1 results in rapid and complete loss of mtDNA (
Hermann et al., 1998;
Rapaport et al., 1998), resulting in absence of respiratory function. In contrast, deletion of mammalian mitofusins or OPA1 results in loss of mtDNA nucleoids from only a subpopulation of mitochondria (
Chen et al., 2007). Here, we show that this unequal distribution of nucleoids is caused, at least in part, by long-term mtDNA depletion. The dramatic reduction of mtDNA levels to 7% of wildtype levels at 2 months is likely a key cause for the mitochondrial myopathy observed in mitofusin-deficient mice. Consistent with a causative role for mtDNA depletion, the reduction in mtDNA levels is found prior to overt histological evidence for muscle fiber dysfunction. Moreover, whereas wildtype muscle shows a rapid post-natal increase in mtDNA from weeks 1 to 7, mitofusin-deficient muscle fail to increase mtDNA levels (), suggesting a possible defect in mtDNA replication. For comparison, MLC-Cre/
Tfam mice--which lack a key DNA-binding protein involved in mtDNA packaging, transcription, and replication--retain greater than 30% mtDNA levels at 4 months of age (
Wredenberg et al., 2002). The MLC-Cre/dm mice therefore provide an animal model for human mtDNA depletion syndromes associated with mitochondrial myopathy (
Copeland, 2008). We do not, however, think that mtDNA depletion solely accounts for the mitochondrial dysfunction in mutant muscle; it is likely that the inability to mix mitochondrial contents further undermines mitochondrial function.
Second, we discovered that loss of mitochondrial fusion in skeletal muscle leads to an increase in mtDNA point mutations and deletions. In double mutant mice, the absolute levels of mutations are too low to account for the severe physiological defects. For comparison, double mutant mice have a several-fold increase in mtDNA point mutations, whereas
PolgAD257A/D257A mutator mice have a 2–3 orders-of-magnitude increase (
Vermulst et al., 2007). In old
Mfn1 mutant mice, mtDNA deletion levels are comparable to that of
PolgAD257A/D257A mice (
Vermulst et al., 2008a). Although their relationship to the physiological phenotypes is unclear, these substantial increases in point mutations and deletions demonstrate the importance of mitochondrial fusion for mtDNA fidelity. It is interesting to note that some cases of dominant optic atrophy caused by dysfunction of the mitochondrial fusion gene OPA1 are associated with respiration-deficient muscle fibers and accumulation of mtDNA deletions (
Amati-Bonneau et al., 2008;
Hudson et al., 2008).
This accumulation of mtDNA mutations could be driven by multiple mechanisms. In principle, the accumulation of mtDNA mutations can be due to an increase in mtDNA damage, a failure to repair damaged mtDNA, or perhaps a failure to clear mitochondria with damaged mtDNA. Our finding that Mfn-double null cells have great protein heterogeneity, from one mitochondrion to another, provides a plausible mechanism that may contribute to each of these processes. If protein stoichiometries are improperly balanced, protein complexes critical for mtDNA replication, maintenance, repair, and clearance may operate inefficiently or with lower fidelity. We anticipate that additional mechanisms leading to mtDNA instability will be uncovered with future studies.
The demonstration of a link between mitochondrial fusion and mtDNA fidelity raises the issue of whether mitochondrial fusion plays a protective role in conditions associated with mtDNA mutations. For instance, age-related neurodegeneration and muscle atrophy are closely associated with mtDNA mutations (
Chomyn and Attardi, 2003;
Krishnan et al., 2007). It will be interesting to examine whether mitochondrial fusion in humans is a modifying factor that affects the rate at which mtDNA mutations occur.
Finally, our finding that loss of Mfn1 is incompatible with an error-prone mtDNA polymerase suggests that mitochondrial fusion can dramatically dampen the deleterious effects of pre-existing mtDNA mutations to preserve respiratory function. The synthetic lethality of mice containing
PolgAD257A/D257A and
Mfn1−/− mutations indicates that a critical cell type has been compromised. Previous experiments show that Mfn1 and Mfn2 play largely redundant roles in mitochondrial fusion, and it is the expression patterns of the two proteins that often dictate which tissues are selectively affected by the deletion of either gene (
Chen et al., 2003;
Chen et al., 2007;
Chen et al., 2005). Therefore, the affected cells in
PolgAD257A/D257A Mfn1−/− mice may express Mfn1 more highly than Mfn2. Alternatively, they may be exquisitely sensitive to changes in mitochondrial function and may be affected by deletion of either mitofusin.
Our findings may be applicable to the pathogenesis of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies caused by mtDNA point mutations and deletions. Such diseases typically show a “threshold effect”, in that clinical signs manifest only when the level of pathogenic mtDNA in a particular cell lineage breaches a critical level (
DiMauro and Schon, 2003;
Rossignol et al., 2003). From studies of patient samples and experimental cybrids, the threshold level for mtDNA deletions is around 60%, whereas the threshold for point mutations can be as high as 90% (
Rossignol et al., 2003;
Chomyn, 1998;
Chomyn et al., 1992). It has been proposed that protection in the face of mtDNA mutations might result from the ability of mitochondrial fusion, through content mixing, to allow mtDNA genomes with distinct mutations to complement each other (
Nakada et al., 2009;
Nakada et al., 2001). Such complementation would be possible even if genomes within a single mitochondrion do not physically interact (
Gilkerson et al., 2008). Our results provide strong experimental support for this hypothesis and suggest that mitochondrial fusion may ameliorate the clinical severity of inherited mtDNA encephalomyopathies. In future work, it will be important to address whether mitochondrial fusion plays an analogous protective role against age-associated mtDNA deletions, which similarly cause cellular dysfunction only upon clonal expansion to high levels (
Bender et al., 2006;
Kraytsberg et al., 2006;
Wanagat et al., 2001).