Morphological and Molecular Characterizations of Psychrophilic Fungus Geomyces destructans from New York Bats with White Nose Syndrome (WNS)

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010783

PLoS One. 2010; 5(5): e10783.

Published online 2010 May 24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010783

PMCID: PMC2875398

Copyright Chaturvedi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Morphological and Molecular Characterizations of Psychrophilic Fungus Geomyces destructans from New York Bats with White Nose Syndrome (WNS)

Vishnu Chaturvedi,^1,²^* Deborah J. Springer,^1,²^¤a Melissa J. Behr,³^¤b Rama Ramani,^1,²^¤c Xiaojiang Li,¹ Marcia K. Peck,¹^¤d Ping Ren,¹ Dianna J. Bopp,⁴ Britta Wood,⁵^¤e William A. Samsonoff,⁶ Calvin M. Butchkoski,⁷ Alan C. Hicks,⁸ Ward B. Stone,⁹ Robert J. Rudd,⁵ and Sudha Chaturvedi^1,²

¹Mycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

²Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, New York, United States of America

³Anatomic Pathology Core, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

⁴Bacteriology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

⁵Rabies Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

⁶Electron Microscopy Core, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

⁷Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America

⁸Bureau of Wildlife, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York, United States of America

⁹Wildlife Pathology Unit, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York, United States of America

Eleftherios Mylonakis, Editor

Massachusetts General Hospital, United States of America

* E-mail: vishnu/at/wadsworth.org

Conceived and designed the experiments: VC DJS MJB RR WAS ACH WBS RJR SC. Performed the experiments: VC DJS MJB RR XL MKP PR DJB BW SC. Analyzed the data: VC DJS MJB RR XL MKP PR DJB BW WAS CMB RJR SC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VC MJB DJB WAS CMB ACH WBS RJR SC. Wrote the paper: VC SC.

^¤aCurrent address: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America

^¤bCurrent address: Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America

^¤cCurrent address: Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

^¤dCurrent address: Biodefense Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America

^¤eCurrent address: Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

Received March 14, 2010; Accepted April 29, 2010.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Background

Massive die-offs of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) have been occurring since 2006 in hibernation sites around Albany, New York, and this problem has spread to other States in the Northeastern United States. White cottony fungal growth is seen on the snouts of affected animals, a prominent sign of White Nose Syndrome (WNS). A previous report described the involvement of the fungus Geomyces destructans in WNS, but an identical fungus was recently isolated in France from a bat that was evidently healthy. The fungus has been recovered sparsely despite plentiful availability of afflicted animals.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have investigated 100 bat and environmental samples from eight affected sites in 2008. Our findings provide strong evidence for an etiologic role of G. destructans in bat WNS. (i) Direct smears from bat snouts, Periodic Acid Schiff-stained tissue sections from infected tissues, and scanning electron micrographs of bat tissues all showed fungal structures similar to those of G. destructans. (ii) G. destructans DNA was directly amplified from infected bat tissues, (iii) Isolations of G. destructans in cultures from infected bat tissues showed 100% DNA match with the fungus present in positive tissue samples. (iv) RAPD patterns for all G. destructans cultures isolated from two sites were indistinguishable. (v) The fungal isolates showed psychrophilic growth. (vi) We identified in vitro proteolytic activities suggestive of known fungal pathogenic traits in G. destructans.

Conclusions/Significance

Further studies are needed to understand whether G. destructans WNS is a symptom or a trigger for bat mass mortality. The availability of well-characterized G. destructans strains should promote an understanding of bat–fungus relationships, and should aid in the screening of biological and chemical control agents.

Introduction

Bats, which are ‘keystone species’ in many ecosystems, play notable roles in plant pollination, forest regeneration and control of insect populations [1], [2]. Bats are important to human health as they are reservoirs or carriers for rabies and other viruses, parasites, and pathogenic fungi [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Hibernation is believed to be an important adaptation in bats that may contribute to their exceptional longevity [8]. The common little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) hibernates, along with the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), in many hibernacula in the Northeastern United States, including caves and mines in upstate New York [9], [10]. Hibernating bats can suffer significant mortality due to adverse environmental conditions such as freezing or flooding, as well as human activities including visitation and pesticide applications [11], [12]. No mass mortality was reported until recently from bat sites that had been surveyed for almost three decades by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Recently, however little brown bats have been found to be dying in large numbers at many hibernation sites in upstate New York [13]. This problem has spread to other States in the Northeastern US (Figure S1).

The first noticeable bat declines in winter hibernacula were observed in 2006 from Hailes and Knox Caves, and Gage and Schoharie Caverns, situated within a 12-km radius of the Albany metropolitan area in upstate New York. In 2007, the Rabies Laboratory at the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health also received unusually large number of bat submissions for rabies testing. The large numbers of bat deaths were considered alarming, because no exceptional events, whether environmental or anthropogenic, were reported from the affected areas during this period. Most diseased animals displayed what came to be known as ‘white nose syndrome’ (WNS), which includes a prominent sign of white cottony growth around the snout. These animals were examined by a number of laboratories for the recovery of pathogenic microbes and/or the presence of toxic chemicals, and a number of animals were selected for necropsy to establish the cause of death. An important breakthrough in these investigations was reported by Blehert et al. [14], who cultured a fungus similar to Geomyces species from tissues of bats afflicted with WNS. Subsequently, this fungus was named as a new species, Geomyces destructans [15], although it is closely related to other psychrophilic (cold-loving) species of Geomyces [16]. A recent publication described the recovery of the fungus and related findings from bats in New York and Connecticut [17]. Very recently, Puechmaille et al. [18] described the isolation of G. destructans from an apparently healthy bat (M. myotis) in France. A common theme of these mycological investigations is the relatively sparse isolations of the fungus from bats despite the ready availability of bats with WNS. Also, no details were provided in the aforementioned publications as to why recovery rates are so low, or what specific requirements (if any) are needed, other than incubation at 4°-7°C to recover this fungus in pure cultures. Thus, mycological investigations of WNS are still in their infancy. An alternative approach for confirming the diagnosis of WNS in bats was recently proposed by means of histopathological criteria [19]. The approach allows diagnosis to be established in symptomatic animals, and it should prove valuable in future surveys that seek to estimate the extent of disease among bat populations. Similar availability of genetic and possibly serological tools can be used for convenient and alternate confirmations of WNS in the affected bats. However, the recovery of the fungus in pure culture, and subsequent characterizations of the fungus, will be critical for achieving an understanding of WNS and bat mortality, and if we are to devise control measures.

Our group has engaged in mycological investigations, parallel to the studies of Blehert et al. [14]. Our findings provide strong evidence for an etiologic role of G. destructans in bat WNS. (i) Direct smears from bat snouts, Periodic Acid Schiff-stained tissue sections from infected tissues, and scanning electron micrographs of bat tissues all showed fungal structures similar to those of G. destructans (ii) G. destructans DNA was directly amplified from infected bat tissues (iii) Isolations of G. destructans in cultures from infected bat tissues showed 100% DNA match with the fungus present in positive tissue samples (iv) RAPD patterns for all G. destructans cultures isolated from two sites were indistinguishable (v) The fungal isolates showed psychrophilic growth (vi) We identified in vitro proteolytic activities suggestive of known fungal pathogenic traits in G. destructans. These findings should help underpin further study of the role of G. destructans in bat WNS and mass mortality.

Results

Microscopy of affected tissues

Skin scrapes were taken from the muzzles of four little brown bats from the Graphite Mine on April 4, 2008. Lactophenol cotton blue mounts of these specimens showed curved conidia characteristic of ascomycetes fungi (Fig. 1A). Sections of skin from muzzles of four humanely euthanized little brown bats collected from the Williams Hotel Mine on March 27, 2008, showed epidermal colonization with focal dermatitis including a few neutrophils in the underlying dermis and fungal hyphae and spores intermixed with bacteria near the surface (Fig. 1Bi, ii). Pathology and virology studies carried out in parallel did not reveal any known bacterial, viral, or parasitic pathogens (details not shown). The evidence for the presence of a mycelial fungus in affected areas of the infected bats was obtained when tissue samples from the Williams Hotel Mine were examined by SEM; this imaging method revealed abundant fungal growth on skin and hair shafts (Fig. 1Ci-iv). The above observations led us to focus on the recovery of the mold from bat tissues and environmental samples.

Figure 1

Microscopic and histopathological evidence of G. destructans in bats with WNS.

Fungal isolations

Initially, all submitted specimens were processed according to the protocols routinely followed by the Mycology Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center, for the recovery of human pathogenic fungi. Thus, Sabouraud agar with antibiotics and Mycosel agar were used for isolation of fungi at 30°C. All of the cultures were either quickly overgrown with bacterial contaminants or yielded common saprobic fungi that did not match the spore pattern seen in the initial microscopic analysis of bat specimens. We obtained similar results when environmental samples were processed on the above media or on Rose Bengal agar. Thereafter, we decided to fortify Sabouraud agar with multiple antibacterials, to discontinue the use of cycloheximide, and to incubate all inoculated tubes at 4°C, in an effort to simulate conditions in caves. After 4 weeks, a few tubes yielded evidence of a slow-growing fungus; the fungus covered the entire tube by 8 weeks (Fig. 2A). Six inoculated tubes yielded identical isolates. However, these tubes still carried a few contaminant fungi and bacteria (Fig. 2B). Fungal isolates were purified by dilution plating of fungal growth from initial culture tubes so as to obtain pure colonies; bacterial contaminants were removed by hydrochloric acid treatment per a procedure customarily followed in the Mycology Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center (Fig. 2C). Finally, we were able to purify five of the six isolates of the fungus from bat tissues; the sixth isolate was lost due to contamination of stock cultures.

Figure 2

G. destructans in culture from bat tissues.

Fungal identification

Initial observations of purified fungal colonies from bat tissues, on Sabouraud dextrose agar and potato dextrose agar, showed septate hyphae with abundant conidia borne directly on hyphae without any fruiting bodies (Fig. 3B). We compared the colony characteristics and spore formation against standard identification keys, and concluded that the isolates most closely resembled hyphomycete fungus classified as Geomyces sp. [16], [20]. Further evidence for involvement of Geomyces sp. in WNS was obtained frin SEM: hyphae and spores from the pure cultures showed exact matches with the fungal hyphae and spores imaged by SEM in tissues from an infected bat (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, one member of the genus, G. pannorum, was already suggested to be involved in some humans and animal mycoses [21], [22], [23], [24]. However, the curved conidia seen in bat isolates were distinct from the club-shaped conidia of G. pannorum, and no arthrospores were seen [20]. All of our initial identifications were tentatively termed Geomyces sp. More recently, the fungus has been delineated as a new species G. destructans [15]. Because the features in our isolates were identical to those of type specimen, we re-named all of our strains as G. destructans. We have deposited a representative strain (G. destructans MYC80251) in the CBS Fungal Collection, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Figure 3

G. destructans in bat tissues and culture are similar.

DNA amplification, nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analyses

Of 17 bat skin tissue samples available for DNA extraction and ITS PCR, 15 proved to be positive for fungal DNA (Table 1). When the PCR products were sequenced and BLAST-searched against GenBank, the closest identity (98%) was seen with G. pannorum strains. Therefore, we initially deposited our sequences in the database as G. pannorum (GenBank EU877917 –EU877931). For four bat samples, identical DNA band patterns were obtained for ITS-PCR analysis from matching tissues and pure cultures (Fig. 4A). Additional information, in Table 1 and Fig. 4B, indicates that 10 bat tissue samples comprising five untreated samples plus five paraffin-embedded samples were positive for G. destructans DNA. No corresponding culture isolations of G. destructans could be made from five untreated tissue samples, because the initial incubations in our laboratory had been at 30°C. Table 1 and Fig. 4B also show that five of 10 bat tissue samples yielded an amplicon beside the expected band for G. destructans. Each of these bands was approximately 650–700 bp in size. Sequencing and BLAST searching revealed that four of these amplicons matched a sequence from Helicostylum elegans, and the fifth amplicon matched a GenBank sequence deposited as Mortierella species. The significance of these additional bands is not clear at present.

Table 1

G. destructans work done at the Mycology Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center.

Figure 4

Molecular analysis of bat tissues and fungal cultures.

Initial phylogenetic analyses of fungal ITS sequences from bat- derived pure cultures and from tissue samples supported close relationship with G. pannorum sequences in GenBank, but the sequences from these samples formed a distinct clade with high bootstrap values (Fig. 5A). Our sequences from bat isolates and from bat tissue samples also showed perfect matches with sequences deposited earlier by Blehert et al. [14] and with more recent sequences from France, deposited by Puechmaille et al. [18]. All of our isolates are now identified in GenBank as G. destructans. Additional evidence for the taxonomic grouping is provided by phylogenetic analyses, based on 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequences that again yielded distinct but related clades of G. pannorum and G. destructans (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5

Phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences from G. destructans.

Molecular typing by RAPD

RAPD molecular typing was used to assess whether single or multiple strains of G. destructans were involved in the local occurrence of bat WNS. Genotyping with five different primers showed that all six G. destructans culture isolates obtained from two sites, approximately 200-km apart, had indistinguishable band patterns. These band patterns were distinct from two G. pannorum isolates used as an outgroup in this analysis (Fig. 4C). Our preliminary results raised the possibility of involvement of a single strain of G. destructans in the outbreak of WNS in bats in upstate NY.

G. destructans characterization

The psychrophilic nature of the recovered fungal strains was tested at -10°C, 4°C, 15°C and 25°C by incubation of point-inoculated colonies on Sabouraud dextrose agar and potato dextrose agar. Good growth was seen both at 4°C and 15°C (Fig. 6) while no growth was visible either at -10°C or 25°C (data not shown). A comparison of growth rates, between 4°C (Fig. 6Aiii) and 15°C (Fig. 6Biii), revealed that the latter was optimal for fungal growth. The ability of the fungus to produce proteolytic and hydrolyzing enzymes was tested by API-ZYM tests. Geomyces destructans isolates produced acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, N-acetyl- β-glucosaminidase, β- glucosidase, esterase, esterase lipase, lipase, leucine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-B1-phophohydrolase, and vailine arylamidase. The fungus did not produce cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucoronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. Plate assays showed that G. destructans secreted proteinases when albumin, casein or gelatin was used as substrates; the fungus was also positive for urease on urea agar (Fig. 7). Surprisingly, no growth was seen on egg yolk agar, which was used to test for phospholipase activity (data not shown).

Figure 6

Growth characteristics of G. destructans isolates.

Figure 7

G. destructans proteolytic activities.

Discussion

The current study has provided a set of complementary observations that strengthen the evidence for an etiologic role of G. destructans in bat WNS. (i) Direct smears from bat snouts, Periodic Acid Schiff-stained tissue sections from infected tissues, and scanning electron micrographs of bat tissues all showed fungal structures similar to those of G. destructans (ii) G. destructans DNA was directly amplified from infected bat tissues (iii) Isolations of G. destructans in cultures from infected bat tissues showed 100% DNA match with the fungus present in positive tissue samples (iv) RAPD patterns for all G. destructans cultures isolated from two sites were indistinguishable (v) The fungal isolates showed psychrophilic growth (vi) We identified in vitro proteolytic activities suggestive of known fungal pathogenic traits in G. destructans. Our findings that G. destructans in bat tissues can be verified by DNA analysis and culture from the same sample, suggest that PCR- nucleotide sequencing can suffice as a screening test for confirming the presence of fungus in bats with WNS.

It is striking that the successful isolations of G. destructans were very few in number, relative to the large number of bat samples examined in this study. Similarly, no fungal isolations could be made from many environmental samples that had been collected from various sites. The low recovery is consistent with the isolations rates documented in previous brief reports on G. destructans from bats both the USA and France [14], [18]. It is possible that the initial processingof skin and environmental samples at 30°C, a temperature that is optimal for recovery of human and animal pathogenic fungi, proved deleterious to any G. destructans that was present in these samples. Additionally, the use of routine culture media appeared inadequate for G. destructans recovery, and so that additional measures were needed before colonies could be purified. It is additionally possible that the particular soil and debris samples analyzed were not optimal for the isolation of G. destructans; many human and animal pathogenic fungi have narrow, specific environmental niches, such that and their natural isolations still remain a rare event despite the development of selective media [25], [26], [27], [28]. Use of selective isolation media incubated under psychrophilic condition, or additional processing of samples prior to inoculation, could be necessary if we are to consistently recover G. destructans from the infected animals and their surroundings. Our present findings provide clues as to the modifications that could facilitate future investigations.

Our data on genotyping suggest the existence of a clonal G. destructans population in our sampled areas over a 200-km distance. The next logical step would be to find out whether G. destructans isolates were native to the hibernacula, or instead a recent ‘hitch-hiker’ into new environment, as is known to be the case for some fungi in Antarctica [29]. Such a study would be important, to account for why WNS suddenly appeared in hibernacula that had no prior history of it across three decades of recorded observations. Some strains of fungi found in the Antarctic strains have been shown to have clonal populations, an attribute not seen in strains collected from other environments such alpine, temperate or tropical areas [30], [31]. We are currently engaged in studies of fungal population genetics, to delineate the likely origin of our G. destructans isolates. The results from these studies should aid in the evaluation of potential control measures, and in the selection of ‘host strain’ for detailed laboratory experiments.

A wide variety of psychrophilic fungal species have been reported from surveys carried out in Arctic and Antarctic environments, and permafrost zones in Russia [29], [32], [33], [34]. Additional lineages of psychrophilic fungi certainly exist as some of them are distributed more widely among temperate climates [35], [36]. No known primary human or animal pathogenic fungi number among the known psychrophiles. However, a number of Chrysosporium species and Geomyces species recovered from extreme low temperatures are known to be capable of degrading hair, skin, and nails [37]. Similarly, a few reports describe Geomyces species, especially G. pannorum, as causal agents of human and animal infections [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [38]. As yet, no human ailments have been reported from areas with WNS and bat mortality. We do not know whether the psychrophilic or the psychrotolerant fungi are pathogenic, or whether their adaptation to the cold is important in the maintenance or enhancement of any pathogenic attributes. In view of our preliminary data, G. destructans proteolytic attributes could play a role in pathogenesis of WNS. It is relevant to recall that grooming, including the allogrooming and nose rubbing common among bats, could enhance traumatic entry of the fungus into affected tissues of bats within a given colony [39]. In such a scenario, the G. destructans proteolytic enzymes identified in the present study could enhance fungal growth and dissemination. Importantly, many of the secretory proteases identified in G. destructans are implicated as virulence traits in a wide variety of microbial pathogens [40]. The skin lesions of WNS-affected bats that were observed by us and others differed from dermatophytosis (ringworm) in animals; the latter condition presents with few to scant fungal elements internal or external to hair shafts, and pronounced inflammation, most commonly granulomatous folliculitis [19], [41]. In contrast, the bats in the current outbreak showed numerous fungal hyphae and spores in their skin, but with scant inflammation. Possibly, such lack of pronounced inflammation associated with fungal invasion observed in this study could be due to differences in general immune responses in bats relative to other mammals or more likely due to a dormant immune system in hibernating animals, which prevents mounting of such a response [42], [43], [44].

Currently, WNS is thought to cause a major disturbance of deep torpor or hibernation; the affected animals are seen to repeatedly groomed areas around their nostrils [14], [18], [19]. Active grooming is a normal behavior for ectoparasite removal, but not during hibernation [39], [45]. It is possible that abnormal grooming could affect the animal's general fitness by depleting energy reserves, and this could decrease long-term survival [46]. Another contributing factor to decreased survival could be that disturbance of the normal hibernation pattern leads to pre-mature departure of the affected animals from the hibernacula. Since insects would not yet have appeared in the surrounding areas, there was no quick replenishment of nutrients and many animals would starve. However, this scenario appears insufficient to account for the great number of dead animals; many carcasses are found deep inside the affected caves and caverns. Therefore, the results obtained thus far, by us and others, do not provide a direct explanation for the observed mass mortality of bats nor do they establish a direct causal link between WNS and bat deaths. It is also not known if the fungus causing WNS produces a toxin or other metabolites that could cause systemic organ failures or malfunctions in the infected bats. Not all bats examined from the affected hibernacula show all signs of WNS, thus raising the possibility that there exists a subclinical form or stage of WNS, which may or may not have originated in the hibernacula. Moreover, the carriage of G. destructans by a healthy M. myotis without any discernible deleterious effects, as documented in the recent report from France raises issues related to host immunity, fungal and other microbial flora, and the role of environmental factors [18]. Further investigations are warranted to establish whether WNS is a symptom of or a trigger for mass mortality in bats.

Materials and Methods

Bat specimens

Seventy-four bat specimens were processed for histology and mycology studies including 55 little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), two northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis); two small-footed bats (Myotis leibii), and one Eastern Pipistrelle (Perimyotis subflavus). Twenty-three of 47 bats whose sex was recorded were females, and 24 were males. The collection sites were Hailes Cave, Williams Hotel Mine, Williams Preserve Mine, Williams Lake Mine, Clarksville Cave, Bitting House, Martins Mine, and Graphite Mine within a 200-km radius from Albany, NY (Fig. S1). Twenty-six environmental samples, comprising mainly soil and debris, were collected from some of these sites and also processed. Lactophenol- cotton blue wet mounts were made from gross skin lesions of the muzzles of four bats from Graphite Mine. DNA from 17 of these bat skin tissue samples were processed for fungal identification by PCR –nucleotide sequencing. All bats were tested for rabies by fluorescent antibody (FA) staining of brain smears at the Rabies Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center.

Fungal isolation and characterization

Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), Mycosel ® agar, SDA fortified with an enhanced panel of antibacterials (amikacin, ampicillin, carbenicillin, cephelixin, cefazolin, colistin methanesulfonate, kanamycin, ofloxacin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin), and Rose Bengal agar were used for the isolation and purification of fungi from the bat tissues and environmental specimens. Potato dextrose agar (PDA) was used to induce spore formation. Standard mycology techniques were used for the study of fungal growth on culture media, temperature requirements, and microscopic studies [20], [47], [48]. Proteolytic enzyme activities were tested with an API ZYM test kit (bioMerieux SA, 69280 Marcy-l'Etoile, France); another medium used was based upon 2% agar containing either 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, casein or gelatin [49], [50]. Phospholipase activity was measured by a plate method using 8% sterile egg yolk [51]. Light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were carried out per protocols routinely used in our laboratory [52].

DNA Isolation, PCR, sequencing and analysis

Genomic DNA from various isolates of Geomyces destructans, and from Geomyces pannorum (University of Alberta Mold Herbarium, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada), were isolated in a BSL-2 cabinet. In brief, fungal growth (approximately 2–5 mm) was suspended in 0.5 ml of DNA extraction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl Ph 7.5; 1% SDS; 100 mM EDTA; 2% TritoN X 100, and 100 mM NaCl) containing 2 g of acid-washed glass beads. The fungal-glass bead suspension was incubated at 70°C for 1 h and then disrupted in a cell disrupter (Vortex-Genie 2; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 20 min. DNA was extracted by a conventional phenol-chloroform procedure, followed by ethanol precipitation. The DNA was purified with 70% ethanol, air-dried, and re-suspended in 50 µl of sterilized MilliQ water containing 200 µg/ml RNase. DNA was finally passed through a PERFORMA® spin column (Edge BioSystems, Gaithersburg, MD), to remove any trace amount of solvents, fungal pigments, and low molecular weight reagents encountered during DNA precipitation steps. DNA from bat skin tissue samples (untreated and paraffin fixed) was extracted with the QIAamp DNA FFPE kit (Quiagen, Valencia, CA) per manufacturer's instructions with minor modifications. After the tissue lysis step, glass beads were added, and the mixture was disrupted in a cell disrupter for 20 min. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions (ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2) and D1/D2 region of the gene encoding 28S RNA of the large subunit (LSU) were amplified using the respective primer sets V47 (ITS1) 5′- TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG – 3′, and V50 (ITS4) 5′ – TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC – 3′ and primer set V1798 5′ – GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′, and V1799 5′ – GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG -3′[53]. PCR was performed in 25 µl of a reaction mixture containing 2 µl of DNA (10–50 ng/µl), 1× buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.02% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.4 µM of each primer, and 0.5 U JumpStart™ KlenTaq® LA DNA polymerase (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO). PCR set up included initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 68°C for 1 min and a final extension step of 68°C for 3 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer, pH 8.3, and amplification products were stained with ethidium bromide and photographed with a visible-UV imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Amplicons were purified with ExoSAP-IT (USB Corp., Cleveland, OH) and subjected to nucleotide sequencing of both strands, with the primers listed above. The Wadsworth Center Molecular Genetics Core facility performed dideoxy sequencing, using an ABI BigDye Terminator version 3.1 cycle sequencing kit with an ABI 3130 or 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The nucleotide sequences were assembled and edited for accuracy with the Sequencher Software 4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI). Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted with the MEGA version 4.1 [54].

Molecular typing by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)

Molecular typing was done with five random probes: a 15-bp minisatellite probe from M13 bacteriophage (5′ GAGGGTGGCGGTTCT 3′); a microsatellite repeat (GACA)₄ probe; and three 10-mer probes namely, OPA 1 (5′-AATCGGGCTG-3′), OPA 2 (5′-GTGATCGCAG-3′) and OPA 3 (5′-GACCGCTTGT), from Eurofins MWG Operon (Huntsville, AL) [55]. PCR was performed in a 20-µl reaction volume containing 2 µl of DNA (50 ng/µl), 1× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.02% BSA, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 2.5 µl of each primer, and 0.4 U of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Single primers were used in the PCR, according to the protocol of Meyer et al.[56]. The PCR steps were initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 50°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and final extension step of 72°C for 8 min. For each of the OPA primers, 45 cycles were used, with annealing at 38°C. PCR amplicons were separated on a 2% agarose gel in TBE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed with a visible-UV imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The PCR amplicon patterns were analyzed with Bionumerics software (Applied Maths Inc., Austin, TX). Dendrograms were created by use of unweighted pair group similarity and arithmetic mean with Dice coefficients, and the position tolerance was set at 1.1% [57].

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Current estimates of the origin and spread of WNS and bat mortality in the United States. Counties are categorized as “Confirmed” or “Likely” by each State agency. All states have confirmed the initial detection within their jurisdiction through submission of specimens validated by a laboratory. Continued confirmation of new counties within a state includes laboratory validation of specimens and/or confirmed by observed clinical field signs within a hibernaculum by state biologists. The “Likely” category is often used prior to receiving confirmation of submitted lab specimens or when unusual winter bat activity is observed on the landscape but observed clinical signs or laboratory specimens cannot be confirmed.

(4.55 MB DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.3M, doc)}

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Wadsworth Center Media and Glassware Unit for specialized culture media, Molecular Genetics Core for DNA sequencing, and Applied Light Microscopy and Electron Microscopy Cores for photography. Mr. Dave Pincus of bioMerieux USA is thanked for providing the API-ZYM kits. Dr. Adrina Verschoor is thanked for editorial comments.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported with funds available as part of the Clinical Laboratory Reference System of the Wadsworth Center. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

References

1. Kunz TH, Fenton MB. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003. Bat Ecology.

2. Williams-Guillen K, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J. Bats limit insects in a neotropical agroforestry system. Science. 2008;320:70. [PubMed]

3. Jülg B, Elias J, Zahn A, Köppen S, Becker-Gaab C, et al. Bat-associated histoplasmosis can be transmitted at entrances of bat caves and not only inside the caves. J Travel Med. 2008;15:133–136. [PubMed]

4. Calisher CH, Childs JE, Field HE, Holmes KV, Schountz T. Bats: Important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:531–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Chaturvedi VP, Randhawa HS, Khan ZU, Singh N, Kini S. Prevalence of Basidiobolus ranarum Eidam in the intestinal tract of an insectivorous bat, Rhinopoma hardwickei hardwickei Gray, in Delhi. Sabouraudia. 1984;22:185–189. [PubMed]

6. Trimarchi CV, Debbie JG. Naturally occurring rabies virus and neutralizing antibody in two species of insectivorous bats of New York State. J Wildl Dis. 1977;13:366–369.

7. Lampo M, Feliciangeli MD, Marquez LM, Bastidas C, Lau P. A possible role of bats as a blood source for the Leishmania vector Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:718–719. [PubMed]

8. Wilkinson GS, South JM. Life history, ecology and longevity in bats. Aging Cell. 2002;1:124–131. [PubMed]

9. Griffin DR. Notes on the life history of New England cave bats. J Mammal. 1940;21:181–187.

10. Hicks AC, Novak PG. History, status, and behaviour of hibernating populations in the Northeast; In: Kurta A, Kennedy J, editors. Austin, TX: Bat Conservation International; 2002. pp. 35–47.

11. Johnson SA, Brack V, Rolley RE. Overwinter weight loss of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) from hibernacula subject to human visitation. Am Mid Nat. 1998;139:255–261.

12. DeBlase AF, Humphrey SR, Drury KS. Cave flooding and mortality in bats in Wind Cave, Kentucky. J Mammal. 1965;46:96.

13. Kelly T. Bats perish, and no one knows why. 2008. The New York Times. New York, NY. 1.

14. Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, et al. Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science. 2009;323:227. [PubMed]

15. Gargas A, Trest MT, Christensen M, Volk TJ, Blehert DS. Geomyces destructans sp.nov. associated with bat white-nose syndrome. Mycotaxon. 2009;108:147–154.

16. Rice AV, Currah RS. Two new species of Pseudogymnoascus with Geomyces anamorphs and their phylogenetic relationship with Gymnostellatospora. Mycologia. 2006;98:307–318. [PubMed]

17. Courtin F, Stone WB, Risatti G, Gilbert K, Van Kruiningen HJ. Pathologic findings and liver elements in hibernating bats with White-Nose Syndrome. Vet Pathol: 2010;47(2):214–219. [PubMed]

18. Puechmaille SJ, Verdeyroux P, Fuller H, Gouilh MA, Bekaert M, et al. White-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) in bat, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:290–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Meteyer CU, Buckles EL, Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Green DE, et al. Histopathologic criteria to confirm white-nose syndrome in bats. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009;21:411–414. [PubMed]

20. de Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gene J, Figueras MJ. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures/Universitat Rovira i Virgili; 2000. Atlas of Clinical Fungi.

21. Christen-Zaech S, Patel S, Mancini AJ. Recurrent cutaneous Geomyces pannorum infection in three brothers with ichthyosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:S112–113. [PubMed]

22. Erne JB, Walker MC, Strik N, Alleman AR. Systemic infection with Geomyces organisms in a dog with lytic bone lesions. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;230:537–540. [PubMed]

23. Gianni C, Caretta G, Romano C. Skin infection due to Geomyces pannorum var. pannorum. Mycoses. 2003;46:430–432. [PubMed]

24. Zelenkova H. Geomyces pannorum as a possible causative agent of dermatomycosis and onychomycosis in two patients. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2006;14:21–25. [PubMed]

25. Carvajal Zamora JR. Isolation of Histoplasma capsulatum from soil in the Aguas Buenos Caves, Aguas Buenos, Puerto Rico. I. An ecological approach. Mycopathologia. 1977;60:157–161. [PubMed]

26. Baptista-Rosas RC, Hinojosa A, Riquelme M. Ecological niche modeling of Coccidioides spp. in western North American deserts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1111:35–46. [PubMed]

27. Klein BS, Vergeront JM, Weeks RJ, Kumar UN, Mathai G, et al. Isolation of Blastomyces dermatitidis in soil associated with a large outbreak of blastomycosis in Wisconsin. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:529–534. [PubMed]

28. Franco M, Bagagli E, Scapolio S, da Silva Lacaz C. A critical analysis of isolation of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis from soil. Med Mycol. 2000;38:185–191. [PubMed]

29. Ruisi S, Barreca D, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S. Fungi in Antarctica. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2007;6:127–141.

30. Möller C, Weber G, Dreyfuss MM. Intraspecific diversity in the fungal species Chaunopycnis alba: Implications for microbial screening programs. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;17:359–372.

31. Murtagh GJ, Dyer PS, Furneaux PA, Crittenden PD. Molecular and physiological diversity in the bipolar lichen-forming fungus Xanthoria elegans. Mycolo Res. 2002;106:1277–1286.

32. Gilichinsky D, Rivkina E, Bakermans C, Shcherbakova V, Petrovskaya L, et al. Biodiversity of cryopegs in permafrost. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;53:117–128. [PubMed]

33. Connell L, Redman R, Craig S, Scorzetti G, Iszard M, et al. Diversity of Soil Yeasts Isolated from South Victoria Land, Antarctica. Microb Ecol. 2008;56:448–459. [PubMed]

34. Malosso E, Waite I, English L, Hopkins D, O'Donnell A. Fungal diversity in maritime Antarctic soils determined using a combination of culture isolation, molecular fingerprinting and cloning techniques. Polar Biol. 2006;29:552–561.

35. Schmidt S, Wilson K, Meyer A, Gebauer M, King A. Phylogeny and ecophysiology of opportunistic “Snow Molds” from a subalpine forest ecosystem. Microb Ecol. 2008;56:681–687. [PubMed]

36. Robinson CH. Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol. 2001;151:341–353.

37. Marshall WA. Aerial transport of keratinaceous substrate and distribution of the fungus Geomyces pannorum in Antarctic soils. Microb Ecol. 1998;36:212–219. [PubMed]

38. Schonborn C, Schmoranzer H. [Mold infections of the toe nails] Untersuchungen uber Schimmelpilzinfektionen der Zehennagel. Mykosen. 1970;13:253–272. [PubMed]

39. Kerth G, Almasi B, Ribi N, Thiel D, Lüpold S. Social interactions among wild female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii) living in a maternity colony. Acta Ethologica. 2003;5:107–114.

40. Lοpez-Otan C, Bond JS. Proteases: Multifunctional enzymes in life and disease. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:30433–30437. [PubMed]

41. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000. Muller and Kirk's Small Animal Dermatology.

42. Hatten BA, Allen R, Sulkin SE. Studies on the immune capabilities of Chiroptera: I. Quantitative and Qualitative Nature of the Immune Responses in Bats to Bacteriophage {varphi}X174. J Immunol. 1970;105:872–878. [PubMed]

43. Carey HV, Andrews MT, Martin SL. Mammalian hibernation: Cellular and molecular responses to depressed metabolism and low temperature. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:1153–1181. [PubMed]

44. Kurtz CC, Carey HV. Seasonal changes in the intestinal immune system of hibernating ground squirrels. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007;31:415–428. [PubMed]

45. ter Hofsted HM, Fenton MB. Relationships between roost preferences, ectoparasite density, and grooming behaviour of neotropical bats. J Zool. 2005;266:333–340.

46. Giorgi MS, Arlettaz R, Christe P, Vogel P. The energetic grooming costs imposed by a parasitic mite (Spinturnix myoti) upon its bat host (Myotis myotis). Proc Biol Sci. 2001;268:2071–2075. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

47. Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; 2004. Introduction to Food- and Airborne Fungi.

48. Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JA. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1992. Medical Mycology.

49. Symonds EP, Trott DJ, Bird PS, Mills P. Growth characteristics and enzyme activity in Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis isolates. Mycopathologia. 2008;166:143–147. [PubMed]

50. De Bernardis F, Mondello F, San Millan R, Ponton J, Cassone A. Biotyping and virulence properties of skin isolates of Candida parapsilosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3481–3486. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

51. Price MF, Wilkinson ID, Gentry LO. Plate method for detection of phospholipase activity in Candida albicans. Sabouraudia. 1982;20:7–14. [PubMed]

52. Chaturvedi V, Fan J, Stein B, Behr MJ, Samsonoff WA, et al. Molecular genetic analyses of mating pheromones reveal intervariety mating or hybridization in Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 2002;70:5225–5235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

53. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, diagnostics and forensics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand D.H, Sninsky J.J, White T.J, editors. PCR Protocols:A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990.

54. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. [PubMed]

55. Dyavaiah M, Ramani R, Chu D, Ritterband D, Shah M, et al. Molecular characterization, biofilm analysis and experimental biofouling study of Fusarium isolates from recent cases of fungal keratitis in New York State. BMC Ophthalmol. 2007;7:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

56. Meyer W, Marszewska K, Amirmostofian M, Igreja RP, Hardtke C, et al. Molecular typing of global isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-a pilot study to standardize techniques on which to base a detailed epidemiological survey. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:1790–1799. [PubMed]

57. Gente S, Sohier D, Coton E, Duhamel C, Gueguen M. Identification of Geotrichum candidum at the species and strain level: proposal for a standardized protocol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33:1019–1031. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science