p97/VCP interacts with aggregated proteins (
25,
26). This suggests that p97/VCP may be involved in protein inclusion formation or aggregate clearance from the cell. p97/VCP binds to histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) (
35). HDAC6 is a cytosolically localized deacetylase (
36). One of its functions is to bind ubiquitinated proteins and facilitate their delivery to the aggresome in times of proteotoxic stress (
36). An aggresome is an actively generated, microtubule-dependent, perinuclear cellular structure (
37). It contains ubiquitinated and aggregated proteins as well as the machinery needed to degrade them (e.g. proteasomal subunits and autophagic components). p97/VCP is also needed for aggresome formation (
17). The loss of p97/VCP activity via RNA interference or following expression of an ATP hydrolysis-deficient mutant which can serve as a potent dominant-negative inhibitor of p97/VCP results in dispersed aggregates of ubiquitinated proteins and prevents aggresome formation following proteasome inhibition (
17,
24,
38).
IBMPFD mutant p97/VCP expression has a similar effect on aggresome formation (
24). In cells expressing IBMPFD mutant VCPs R155H, A232E or R95G, proteasome inhibition failed to induce a single perinuclear aggresome as was seen in control or p97/VCP-WT expressing cells (
24). Similarly, in IBMPFD mutant cell lines, expression of an expanded polyQ failed to generate a larger perinuclear aggresome (
24). Instead, smaller ubiquitin-positive polyQ aggregates were found throughout the cytoplasm as opposed to them consolidating in an aggresome. These smaller cytosolic inclusions did not co-localize with autophagic machinery such as LC3, p62 and HDAC6 (
24). This resulted in the accumulation of insoluble polyQ protein, a decrease in the clearance of polyQ inclusions and cell death in IBMPFD mutant expressing cells (
24). The decrease in polyQ aggregate clearance was also found in IBMPFD mutant expressing transgenic mouse muscle (
24,
39).
Although autophagic proteins did not co-localize to the inclusion in IBMPFD mutant expressing cells, p97/VCP did localize to polyQ aggregates both at the aggresome in control and p97/VCP-WT cells and at the smaller non-aggresomal polyQ inclusions in IBMPFD mutant expressing cells (
24). This raises the question; what is the role of p97/VCP on protein aggregates and how do IBMPFD mutants on these aggregates affect degradation. One possibility is that p97/VCP is ‘triaging’ an aggregated protein to the aggresome and autophagic pathways. Or, p97/VCP may be actively delivering aggregated proteins to the autophagosome. Alternatively, it is conceivable that p97/VCP is trapped within the polyQ inclusions in a futile attempt to disaggregate or deliver them to the UPS. To address this question and distinguish between the function of VCP-WT and the dysfunction of IBMPFD mutant VCP, fluorescently tagged p97/VCPs were co-expressed in polyQ expressing cells and visualized via live imaging (
24). p97/VCP-WT protein was found to rim polyQ aggresomes (
24). In addition, the aggregate-associated p97/VCP-WT protein was freely diffusible with cytosolic p97/VCP. This was in contrast to IBMPFD mutant p97/VCPs which associated with a polyQ inclusion but remained stuck on the aggregate (
24). An analogous finding was seen via co-immunoprecipitation in which IBMPFD mutant VCPs bound more polyQ protein than VCP-WT. This was similar to what was seen when a hydrolysis-deficient p97/VCP was evaluated on a polyQ aggregate (
24).
p97/VCP requires ATP binding at the D2 domain to engage with substrates and cofactors. ATP hydrolysis then provides the energy necessary for substrate disengagement (
15). Therefore, point mutations in the Walker B motif of the D2 domain can generate a p97/VCP that binds substrate but fails to release; effectively serving as ‘substrate-trap’ mutant (
18). These data suggest that IBMPFD mutants behave similarly to a hydrolysis-deficient mutant and bind substrate (e.g. protein aggregates) but fail to release or deliver them to the UPS, autophagy or aggresomal pathways. However,
in vitro ATPase activity assays show that IBMPFD mutants are actually ‘hyperactive’ and have higher basal activity rates (
30). This would be inconsistent with a ‘substrate-trap’ mutant that is unable to hydrolyze ATP. There are several plausible explanations for this discrepancy. For example,
in vitro basal ATPase activity does not reflect the ‘stimulated’ ATPase activity that likely occurs with substrate engagement. Many AAA+ proteins have low basal ATPase activity that increases several fold with the addition of substrate and/or cofactors. A potentially suitable
in vitro substrate for VCP has been recently identified and is a fragment of synaptotagmin-1 (
40). This peptide stimulates the ATPase activity of VCP by 4-fold (
40). Whether IBMPFD mutants have a similar stimulation remains to be determined. Another possibility is that IBMPFD mutations lead to a structural uncoupling of the D2 and N domains during the ATP hydrolysis cycle. This scenario could in fact result in a VCP protein with increased ATPase activity since the steric hindrance of the N domain would be removed. One could imagine that IBMPFD disease mutations within the linker region between the N and D1 domains or at the N–D1 domain interface would lead to a poorly moving N domain that could bind substrate but fail to release.