PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2010; 5(5): e10707.
Published online 2010 May 19. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0010707
PMCID: PMC2873411

Cell Therapy of Congenital Corneal Diseases with Umbilical Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Lumican Null Mice

Che John Connon, Editor

Abstract

Background

Keratoplasty is the most effective treatment for corneal blindness, but suboptimal medical conditions and lack of qualified medical personnel and donated cornea often prevent the performance of corneal transplantation in developing countries. Our study aims to develop alternative treatment regimens for congenital corneal diseases of genetic mutation.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from neonatal umbilical cords were transplanted to treat thin and cloudy corneas of lumican null mice. Transplantation of umbilical mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved corneal transparency and increased stromal thickness of lumican null mice, but human umbilical hematopoietic stem cells failed to do the same. Further studies revealed that collagen lamellae were re-organized in corneal stroma of lumican null mice after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Transplanted umbilical mesenchymal stem cells survived in the mouse corneal stroma for more than 3 months with little or no graft rejection. In addition, these cells assumed a keratocyte phenotype, e.g., dendritic morphology, quiescence, expression of keratocyte unique keratan sulfated keratocan and lumican, and CD34. Moreover, umbilical mesenchymal stem cell transplantation improved host keratocyte functions, which was verified by enhanced expression of keratocan and aldehyde dehydrogenase class 3A1 in lumican null mice.

Conclusions/Significance

Umbilical mesenchymal stem cell transplantation is a promising treatment for congenital corneal diseases involving keratocyte dysfunction. Unlike donated corneas, umbilical mesenchymal stem cells are easily isolated, expanded, stored, and can be quickly recovered from liquid nitrogen when a patient is in urgent need.

Introduction

There are growing interests in the use of stem cells, e.g., embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, etc. in treating human congenital diseases caused by genetic mutation and acquired diseases [1][8]. Especially, transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells has drawn much attention in regenerative medicine in the past decade [9], [10]. Since mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are first isolated from bone marrow, these plastic adherent cells have been identified and cultivated from many connective tissues, e.g., umbilical cord, amniotic membrane, cartilage, adipose tissue, and conjunctiva [11][14]. MSCs are multipotent and are capable of differentiating into various progenitor cells that form connective tissues such as bone, bone marrow, cartilage, adipose tissue, etc. Thus, there have been growing interests in the application of MSC transplantation in regenerative medicine to repair and restore normal function of diseased and injured tissues. For example, bone marrow MSCs have been used in treating diseases in animal models as well as in human clinical trials in areas such as autoimmune diseases, solid organ allograft survival, hepatic cirrhosis, kidney diseases, neuro- and muscle-degenerative diseases, myocardial infarction, and spinal cord injury [15][21]. Reports using stem cells isolated from individuals have demonstrated that the number of cells as well as the differentiation and proliferation potential of MSCs decreases with the donors' age [22], [23]. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UMSCs) from newborns are presumably young and therefore are likely to have a more potent proliferation and differentiation capability. Other advantages to the use of UMSCs is that the availability of umbilical cords from newborn babies is almost unlimited and the cells can be expanded and stored in liquid nitrogen in a tissue bank and thawed for use. However, the utilization of human UMSCs in treating disease is surprisingly rare in comparison to the use of bone marrow MSCs. Only a limited number of publications have reported on the success of using human UMSCs to treat liver fibrosis and spinal cord injury in animal models [24][27].

Dr. Eduard Zirm performed the first corneal transplantation in 1905 and to date this technique remains the most effective way for treating corneal blindness caused by microbial infection, mechanical and chemical injuries, and congenital defects due to genetic mutation [28]. For example, trachoma is the number one cause of corneal scarring worldwide, particularly in developing countries where hygiene and public health services are inadequate. In developed countries, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, congenital hereditary corneal defect, e.g., congenital corneal stromal dystrophy, corneal lattice dystrophy, keratoconus, etc., and corneal injuries are frequent corneal diseases requiring corneal transplantation [29]. In the United States, there are only enough donated corneas suitable for transplantation for the patients in the direst need; however, this number is expected to decrease as the number of individuals receiving LASIK (laser in situ keratomileusis) increases. Worldwide, there is a shortage of suitable corneas for transplantation because of religious and/or regional customs. Corneal blindness in developing countries is exacerbated by the shortage of trained medical personnel (e.g., qualified corneal surgeons) and adequate medical facilities to perform corneal transplantation. Thus, many children do not receive proper treatment leading to permanent visual impairment that can ultimately lead to a substantial burden on both the family and society as a whole. It should be noted that currently there is no effective alternative procedure in lieu of keratoplasty in treating corneal blindness. Therefore, it is necessary to develop alternative treatment regimens to replace conventional corneal transplantation, which can be performed in the suboptimal medical conditions found in developing countries as well as under emergency situations, e.g., battle field, disastrous regions, earthquake, etc. One such alternative treatment is the transplantation of multipotent MSCs.

Lumican and keratocan, belonging to the family of small leucine rich proteoglycans, are the major keratan sulfate proteoglycans in the corneal stroma, which are required for corneal transparency [30]. Lumican null (Lum-/-) mice manifest thin and cloudy corneas due to disorganization of stromal extracellular collagen matrix and down-regulated expression of keratocan [31], [32]. In this study, we used Lum-/- mice as an experimental model to test the efficacy of UMSCs transplantation in treating congenital corneal diseases. Our results indicate that human UMSCs transplantation greatly improved corneal stromal thickness and transparency in Lum-/- mice with little or no host graft rejection.

Results

Characteristics of UMSCs isolated from human umbilical cord

Two populations of stem cells, UMSC and umbilical cord-derived hematopoietic stem cells (UHSCs) were isolated from human umbilical cord and cord blood, respectively. To characterize the stem cells, flow cytometry was used to determine the expression pattern of CD markers. The results showed that >95% of the fibroblast-like plastic-adherent cells expressed characteristic CD markers of mesenchymal stem cells, e.g., CD105/SH2 (endoglin), CD73/SH3 (NT5E), CD90 (Thy1), CD29 (integrin β1), CD44 (HA receptor), CD13 (alanine aminopeptidase); and <1% of cells were positive for hematopoietic cell CD markers, e.g., CD45 (leukocytes), CD34 (hematopoietic stem cells), CD14 (co-receptor of TLR4 and MD-2), HLA-DR (MHC-II), and CD31 (endothelial cells) (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1
FACS analysis of UMSCs and UHSCs.

The plastic adherent UMSCs were multipotent and capable of differentiation into adipocytes, osteoblasts and chondrocytes when they were cultured in adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic medium, respectively [27], [33], [34]. To demonstrate differentiation into these cell types, staining with oil-red O, alkaline phosphatase, and toluidine blue were performed. Oil-red O staining showed large amounts of lipid droplets indicating induction of adipogenesis (Fig. 1B). Osteogenesis was confirmed by expression of alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 1C) while the synthesis of chondroitin sulfate verified by toluidine blue staining demonstrated induction of chondrogenesis (Fig. 1D).

To assess the percentage of CD34 positive cells after the volume reduction of cord blood, flow cytometry was employed to examine the characteristics of cord blood [35]. The results showed that the cord blood cells were positive to CD34, CD45, CD59, CD133, and BCRP1 (Fig. 1E).

To verify the expression pattern of UMSCs and UHSCs prior to transplantation, immunofluorescent staining was performed with selected CD markers for MSCs and HSCs, as well as to keratocan and lumican. The results showed that both human UMSCs and UHSCs did not express keratocan and lumican, and UMSCs were CD34 negative (Fig. 1F).

Corneal stromal transplantation of UMSCs increased stromal thickness and decreased corneal haze in Lum-/- mice

To examine the possibility whether human UMSC transplantation can be used as a treatment regimen for congenital corneal diseases of genetic mutation, UMSCs were transplanted into the left corneas (OS) of 6 week-old Lum-/- mice (n = 11), the right corneas (OD) served as contra-lateral controls. In vivo confocal microscopy with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph-HRTII Rostock Cornea Module (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was employed to capture through-focus/serial images by a continuous Z-axis laser scanning of the entire corneal stroma starting at the corneal epithelium and ending at the endothelium, at various time points including before transplantation and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after transplantation. Five different regions of each corneal center were scanned. Corneal stromal haze was determined by measuring total pixel intensity of light scattering through the 3D volume while corneal stromal thickness was measured by calculating the axial distance from the anterior to posterior stroma, as previously described [36]. Fig. 2A and 2B respectively displayed 3-dimensional corneal images of a Lum-/- mice before and 12 weeks after transplantation. It is clear to see that less corneal haze and thicker stroma were observed in UMSC transplanted corneas. Through calculating corneal stromal depth by Z-stacks from in vivo confocal microscopy, stromal thickness significantly increased in the corneas transplanted with UMSCs as early as 8 weeks after surgery (Fig. 2C). Although there was only an average of a 4.1 micron increase in corneal stromal thickness, this represents approximately a 10% increase when compared to the full stromal thickness of un-transplanted corneas. It should be noted that transplantation of human UHSCs failed to improve the corneal transparency and stromal thickness in Lum-/- mice (data not shown).

Figure 2
Corneal stromal thickness and transparency in Lum-/- mice was improved by the transplantation of UMSCs.

To more closely assess the changes of stromal light-scattering, total pixel intensity of 3-dimensional volume was divided by stromal thickness and the average of light scattering per micron thickness of the corneal stroma was calculated. In untransplanted corneas, light scattering in the corneal stroma showed a slight increase with age; in contrast, corneal light scattering decreased in transplanted corneas, which became statistically significant after 8 weeks (Fig. 2D).

Studies have shown that increased light scattering in the posterior stroma of Lum-/- mice is associated with the assembly of abnormal corneal collagen fibrils leading to increased fibril size and spacing [37]. To further analyze the effect of UMSCs transplantation on light scatting, corneal stromal volume was divided in half and the average pixel intensity per micron thickness of the anterior and posterior cornea calculated. The data indicate that the scattering increases in the anterior stroma with age, and that transplantation has a significant effect on this age-related scattering than the original. The results revealed a significant decrease in the anterior stroma 8 weeks after transplantation as compared to that of untreated corneas, while stromal haze was not significantly improved in the posterior until after 12 weeks (Fig. 2E,F). These findings suggest that in order to rescue severely disorganized corneal collagen as is found in the posterior stroma of Lum-/- mice may require longer than 12 weeks. Transplantation of UHSCs failed to improve the transparency and stromal thickness of Lum-/- corneas (data not shown)

Stromal collagen of Lum-/- mice was re-organized through the transplantation of UMSCs

Non-linear optical imaging (NLO) of second harmonic generated signals (SHG) from collagen is a novel method for assessing collagen matrix organization in normal and diseased corneas [38]. To determine whether the improvement of corneal transparency is associated with a change in the organization of collagen fibers in Lum-/- mice after UMSCs transplantation, 5 transplanted and 2 un-transplanted corneas from Lum-/- mice were stained with Syto 59 and subsequently examined by NLO microscopy using the methods previously described [39]. In comparison to wild type corneas, the images of forward-scattered SHG signals revealed that longer, larger, and more organized collagen fibers were present in the transplanted posterior corneal stroma compared to that of un-transplanted corneas, albeit the structure of the collagen matrix did not fully recover to that of wild type corneas. For example, the wide bundles of collagen fibers that form the wide posterior collagen lamellae in the wild type cornea were completely disrupted in the Lum-/- mouse (Fig. 3A). By comparison, UMSC transplanted corneas showed a partial recovery with longer and more intact collagen fibers compared to the Lum-/- mice but not as broad as in the wild type cornea. This suggests that more time or transplantation into the posterior stroma may be required to get full restoration of corneal transparency in these corneas. Similarly, images from back scattered SHG signals also showed better organized collagen lamellae in the posterior stroma of wild type mice, which was completely disrupted in the Lum-/- mouse (Fig. 3B). Transplantation of UMSCs also appeared to partially restore this organized pattern.

Figure 3
Improved collagen fiber organization in the corneal stroma of Lum-/- mice 12 weeks after UMSC transplantation.

Taken together, our findings suggest that a xenograft of human UMSCs into the mouse cornea was capable of improving corneal transparency and stromal thickness in Lum-/- mice. It is worthy to note that the success of this therapeutic strategy may depend on several factors: 1. improvement of cell function by UMSCs transplantation; 2. survival of UMSCs in the new tissue environment; 3. differentiation of UMSCs into specific cell types of the target tissue; 4. maintenance under the same cell cycle control as the host tissue without causing tumorigenesis. Herein, these results revealed that UMSCs transplantation can improve corneal transparency and stromal thickness through the improvement of the collagen matrix. Therefore, the following experiments were performed to determine whether UMSCs transplanted into Lum-/- mice corneas survive, differentiate and maintain cell cycle control similar to host keratocytes.

Human UMSCs assume dendritic cell morphology in the mouse corneal stroma

Human UMSCs in suspension appear small, have a round cell shape with a few cell processes, and have large and round nuclei with a prominent nucleolus [40]. For tracing the morphological changes of UMSCs in the corneal stroma, UMSCs were ex vivo labeled with DiI or DiO prior to transplantation into the cornea and examined by fluorescent stereomicroscopy. Initially, UMSCs stayed at the site of injection and then gradually migrated to the corneal periphery. Morphologically, UMSCs displayed a round cell shape in the first week after transplantation. Three weeks later, transplanted UMSCs were homogeneously distributed in the cornea and concurrently underwent morphological changes to assume a dendritic cell shape as revealed by fluorescent stereomicroscopy (Fig. 4A). These morphological changes were better illustrated by confocal microscopy after phalloidin staining with the whole mount Lum-/- mouse cornea (Fig. 4B). Z-stack confocal images revealed that transplanted UMSCs after 5 weeks displayed a dendritic and flat cell shape and formed a three dimensional network of cell-cell contacts between host stromal cells and donor cells via their extensive dendritic processes, which is similar to those of native keratocytes (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4
Transplanted UMSCs undergoing morphological changes resembling that of host dendritic keratocytes.

Survival and proliferation of transplanted UMSCs in mouse corneal stroma

Successful xenograft of human UMSCs into the mouse cornea requires that the transplanted cells escape from host immune rejection and are able to continue to survive in the mouse corneal stroma. To compare the survival rates of UMSCs and UHSCs in the corneal stroma, UMSCs and UHSCs labeled by DiI or DiO were transplanted into the corneal stroma of Lum-/- mice. At different time points, the nuclei were stained with DAPI and the number of transplanted cells was determined by counting DiI or DiO-labeled cells in confocal Z-stack images. The results revealed that immediately after transplantation the number of UMSCs underwent a rapid decrease, leveling off by two weeks and of these cells half of them survived for more than 12 weeks in the stroma. By contrast, the number of transplanted UHSCs in recipient corneas rapidly and continuously decreased (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5
The apoptosis of transplanted UMSCs and UHSCs in the recipient Lum-/- corneal stroma.

A TUNEL assay was performed to examine if apoptosis may account for the cell loss after transplantation. As shown in Figure 5B and 5C, the rate of apoptosis after UHSCs transplantation differed from that of UMSCs. The apoptotic rate of UMSC derived cells was initially higher than that of transplanted UHSCs within the first 48 hours of transplantation; however, this rate markedly decreased 1 week after transplantation (Fig. 5B,C). The decreased apoptotic rate of UMSC-derived cells was associated with a slower decrease in cell number after 3 weeks and 5 weeks. By contrast, UHSC-derived cells showed a marked increase in the rate of apoptosis after 1 week and remained high for up to 5 weeks (Fig. 5B,C), which is consistent with the continued decline in cell numbers noted earlier.

It has been reported that MSCs suppress the host immune response [41], which might explain why UMSCs survive in the mouse stroma; in addition to the fact that the cornea is an immune privileged tissue. Thus, immunofluorescent staining with anti-CD45, anti-CD90, and anti-F4/80 antibodies were used to determine the host immune and inflammatory response after UMSC and UHSC transplantation. The results showed that there were more CD45+ leukocytes, CD90+ (Thy-1 cells), and F4/80+ macrophages presented in UHSC transplanted corneas than those transplanted with UMSCs (Fig. 6A–D), indicating that UHSC transplantation triggered a strong host immune rejection.

Figure 6
The recipient inflammatory response after UMSCs and UHSCs transplantation into Lum-/- cornea.

It should be noted that the fluorescence intensity of individual DiI- or DiO-labeled UMSCs appeared to decrease slightly over time (Fig. 4B), suggesting that transplanted UMSCs proliferate. To verify this possibility, BrdU labeling was performed 2 hours prior to sacrifice. The corneas were then subjected to whole mount immunostaining with an anti-BrdU antibody. As expected, transplanted UMSCs underwent proliferation evidenced by the presence of BrdU-positive cells within the first few weeks after transplantation (Fig. 7A,B). The transplanted UMSCs became quiescent (no BrdU positive UMSCs) 8 weeks after transplantation, a characteristic feature of adult corneal keratocytes.

Figure 7
UMSCs-derived cells changed to be quiescent in Lum-/- cornea after the transplantation.

Expression of keratocyte markers by UMSCs transplanted into the corneal stroma

As mentioned above, one of the criteria for successful cell therapy is that donor cells must differentiate and assume a native (host) phenotype and express genes specific to the target cells. To verify that UMSCs could indeed assume a keratocyte phenotype, the synthesis of KS-lumican and KS-keratocan was determined. We have previously generated a keratocan null (Kera-/-) mouse, which does not express keratocan, a cornea-specific keratan sulfate proteoglycan, and displays a thinner corneal stroma than that of a wild type mouse [42]. For these studies, we took advantage of keratocan and lumican null mice whose expression of keratocan and lumican by UMSCs could be determined by immunofluorescent staining and western blot analysis. Fig. 8A shows the presence of keratocan in the corneal stroma of Kera-/- mice detected by rabbit anti-human keratocan antibody 5 weeks after transplantation of UMSCs. Western blot analysis indicated that a single 45 kD protein was detected after treatment with keratanase and/or endo-β-galactosidase (Fig. 8B). These observations are consistent with the notion that the newly synthesized human keratocan expressed by transplanted UMSCs is keratan sulfate proteoglycan. Similar results were obtained when UMSCs were transplanted into corneas of Lum-/- mice (Fig. 8C,D). Immunostaining with anti-CD34 antibodies, a known marker of human keratocytes [43], [44], was also performed. Fig. 8E demonstrated that transplanted human UMSCs in the stroma were CD34-positive 5 weeks after transplantation.

Figure 8
The synthesis of KS-keratocan, KS-lumican, and expression of CD34 by transplanted UMSCs.

Improved host keratocyte function by UMSCs transplantation in Lum-/- mice

Our previous studies suggest that lumican is a matrikine and plays a pivotal role in regulating multiple cellular functions, e.g., cell migration, cell proliferation, survival, and gene expression in addition to serving as a regulator of collagen fibrillogenesis [30], [45], [46]. Thus, it is likely that UMSCs transplantation into Lum-/- corneas may improve overall tissue function by up-regulating keratocyte specific genes, i.e., keratocan and aldehyde dehydrogenase that are down regulated in Lum-/- corneas [45]. To examine this possibility, semi-quantitative western blot analysis was employed to determine the levels of keratocan and aldehyde dehydrogenase expression in Lum-/- mouse corneas 5 weeks after UMSC transplantation. Fig. 9A–D show that keratocan and aldehyde dehydrogenase levels were increased 2–3 folds after UMSC transplantation.

Figure 9
Up-regulation of keratocan and ALDH3A1 was observed in the Lum-/- mouse cornea after UMSC transplantation.

Discussion

Although penetrating keratoplasty (corneal transplantation) has been the most successful organ transplantation, the supply of donor corneas suitable for transplantation is diminishing because of the increased popularity of laser refractive surgery, which leaves the cornea unsuitable for later organ transplantation. Thus, alternatives to organ transplantation for treating corneal blindness are needed. Use of keratoprostheses has achieved some success as one of the final solutions when an ordinary keratoplasty is not possible [47], [48]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that transplantation of human corneal stromal stem cells can improve corneal transparency in Lum-/- mice [49]. It should be noted however that the number of corneal stromal stem cells that can be obtained from human corneas is quite limited and very technically demanding.

The present study is the first to provide the evidence demonstrating that UMSCs transplantation improved corneal transparency and stromal thickness in Lum-/- mice. The observed increase in corneal function appears to be associated with improved organization of the collagen matrix when compared to that of untransplanted Lum-/- corneas. We have subsequently provided data demonstrating that transplanted UMSCs: can survive and escape host rejection, showing a reduced host infiltration of immune cells; assume a keratocyte-like phenotype, having a dendritic morphology that forms a three dimensional network and cell-cell contacts with host stromal cells; and acquire a unique gene expression pattern similar to that of corneal keratocytes, e.g., synthesis of KS-keratocan and KS-lumican, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and CD34 and became quiescent after 8 weeks.

Further studies are certainly needed to elucidate molecular and cellular mechanisms that govern the differentiation of UMSCs within the stroma of recipient Lum-/- mice. For example, does the improved organization of the collagen matrix in treated Lum-/- corneas require de novo synthesis of collagen or is the presence of human lumican produced by the donor cells sufficient? Our studies indicated that transplantation of human UHSCs elicited a significant immune response, which coincided with the loss of transplanted UHSCs within a few weeks of transplantation. In contrast, transplantation of human UMSCs into mouse corneas caused little or no host immune response. The molecular and cellular mechanisms by which MSCs suppress the host immune response are not known, albeit co-transplantation of MSCs has been widely used in regenerative medicine [50], [51]. Likewise, bone marrow derived mesenchymal cells have been co-transplanted with bone marrow cells in cancer patients and other solid organ transplantation to reduce graft versus host reaction [52]. It has been recently demonstrated that bone marrow MSCs produce nitrous oxide (NO) when stimulated by leukocyte cytokines, which then inhibits T-cell proliferation [53]. Thus, it is possible that a similar mechanism is involved in UMSCs survival. Interestingly, there was a high rate of UMSCs apoptosis in the first 48 hours after transplantation with very low apoptosis after 1 week. We propose that the early encounter of UMSCs with cytokines produced by inflammatory cells causes UMSCs apoptosis shortly after transplantation, and subsequently up-regulates the expression of iNOS (inducible nitrous oxide synthetase and the production of NO that in turn suppress T-cell proliferation. It should be noted, however, the mechanism that triggers UMSC apoptosis in the early phase of transplantation is not known. It is possible that heterogeneity of UMSCs population may account for the observation. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to test these possibilities.

Taken together, our data showed that xenograft of human UMSCs into mouse corneas did not trigger graft rejection. Thus, allograft of human UMSCs into human corneas is likely to be tolerated and is of great potential for being successful in treating human corneal blindness. Therefore, cell based therapy with umbilical mesenchymal stem cells is a promising medical procedure to treat congenital corneal diseases involving keratocytes dysfunction.

Based on the data provided, we suggest that UMSC transplantation may be used as an alternative treatment to corneal transplantation for genetic and acquired corneal diseases. Unlike donated corneas, the supply of human UMSCs is almost unlimited. They are easily isolated from umbilical cord and can be expanded in cell culture, and can be stored by tissue banking and quickly recovered-from liquid nitrogen in preparation for transplantation. In addition, intrastromal injection is a simple surgical procedure and can be performed by adequately trained medical personnel under even suboptimal medical conditions in developing countries, areas of natural disaster, and/or the battle field.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and culture of umbilical cord derived UMSCs

After disinfection with 75% ethanol, the fresh umbilical cord was transferred to PBS where excess blood on the surface was removed. After removal of blood vessels, the tissue was sliced into very small pieces followed by treatment with 0.05% trypsin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) and 300U collagenase (Stem Cell Technologies) in alpha-MEM (Gibco) for 1 hour at 37°C. The solid parts were filtered and the filtrate was centrifuged at 400G to collect the cells. After removing the supernatant, the cells were cultured in alpha-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Waltham, MA) in 5% CO2 in a 37°C incubator. On the next day, non-adherent cells were removed. The medium was changed every 3–4 days until the plastic adherent cells reached to near confluence. At this point, the cells were harvested with Trypsin/EDTA and subcultured at a density of 3–6×103 cells/cm2

According to the current regulation of the Department of Health of Taiwan, only parent's consent is required for the collection of umbilical cords from the newborn baby. Such parents' written consent forms acknowledging tissue donation were obtained prior to the collection of umbilical cords. In the present studies, no human subject was involved, thereby no IRB is required. However, the animal protocol (#Kao 05-01-11-02) for the use of these cells in experimental mice were reviewed and approved on February 11, 2008 by IACUC of the University of Cincinnati.

Characteristics of human UMSCs by flow cytometry

Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated or phythoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antibodies against CD14, CD34, CD45, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD166, HLA-ABC, HLADR (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and CD105 (Southern Biotech) were used. The plastic adherent cells were detached with trypsin/EDTA in PBS and incubated (30 min) with the antibodies. In each case, 1×104 events were acquired and analyzed with Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

In vitro UMSC differentiation

The plastic adherent cells were seeded at a density of 1×105 cells/well (6-well plate) and incubated overnight. Osteogenic differentiation was induced using the STEMPRO® Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit (Gibco). Medium was changed twice a week over a period of 14~21 days. To visualize osteogenic differentiation, cells were stained for alkaline phosphatase. Adipogenic differentiation was induced using the STEMPRO® Adipogenesis Differentiation Kit (Gibco). Induction medium was changed every 3–4 days and cells were cultured for at least 21 days. To demonstrate the presence of adipocytes-like cells, cells were fixed with 10% neutral buffered 3.7% formalin for 10 min, and then cytoplasmic inclusions of neutral lipids were stained with oil-red O (3 mg oil red/ml 60% isopropanol) for 15 min. Chondrogenic differentiation was induced using the STEMPRO® Chondrogenesis Differentiation Kit (Gibco) for 14 days and toluidine blue staining was employed to visualize proteoglycans.

Cell processing prior to transplantation

Following the thawing of UMSCs from liquid nitrogen in a 37°C water bath, UMSCs were washed by centrifugation and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM, Invitrogen Corporation, Grand Island, New York). UMSCs were labeled by incubation in 1[ratio]200 diluted DiO (green fluorescence) in DMEM for 3 hours at room temperature or DiI (red fluorescence) in DMEM for 30 min at 37°C. After washing, UMSCs were resuspended in PBS and a10 µl of cell suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 0.4% trypan blue to determine the total number of viable cells using a hemacytometer. The fluorescent intensity might decrease, if the labeled cells underwent proliferation.

Intrastromal injection of stem cells

To determine the stromal haze and thickness, mice (n = 11) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine hydrochloride (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). The eyes were rinsed with PBS and topically anesthetized with a drop of proparacaine. A corneal intrastromal tunnel into the stroma was created with a 33-gauge needle. 1×104 cells in 2 µl PBS were injected into each cornea. After injection, the eyes were treated once with ophthalmic antibiotic ointment. For immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis, the numbers of mice used for each condition and time point were indicated in legends of individual figures.

Analysis of corneal stromal haze and thickness

In vivo analysis of corneal stromal thickness and haze was performed with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph-HRTII Rostock Cornea Module (HRT-II, Heidelberg Engineering Inc., Germany) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, a drop of GenTeal® Gel (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, New Jersey) was applied to the tip of the HRT-II objective as immersion fluid. Subsequently, a series of images were collected to cover the whole stromal thickness as a continuous z-axis scan through the entire corneal stroma at 1–3 µm increments starting from the basal layer of corneal epithelium and ending at the corneal endothelium (the lens of HRTII has a working distance of 77 µm). A depth intensity profile from scans was generated by plotting the average pixel intensity per plane as a function of corneal depth. Corneal light scattering was then measured as previously described [54] by calculating the total pixel intensity as measured by the area under the curve. Corneal thickness was determined by measuring the axial distance from the anterior to posterior cornea.

Fluorescence and non-linear optical imaging of second harmonic generation (SHG)

Briefly, following nuclear staining with Syto 59, the corneal button was mounted onto the slide with Mowiol medium (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and imaged using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope platform with an 40×water immersion objective lens (numerical aperture, 1.2). The fluorescent signal detection from DiO and Syto 59 were obtained using 488 nm and 633 nm laser lines from the argon and red He-Ne lasers, respectively. Emitted light was detected using a 500 nm to 550 nm and 650 LP filters for green and Syto 59, respectively. Non-linear optical imaging of second harmonic generated signals (SHG) of collagen organization was performed using mode-locked titanium (MaiTai; Spectra-Physics Lasers Division, Mountain View, CA). The SHG forward-scattered signals were collected using a 0.8 NA condenser lens with a narrow band-pass filter (400/50) placed in front of the transmission light detector. Backward scattered SHG signals were detected with the Meta detector on the Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope.

BrdU administration and tissue preparation for morphology

Two hours prior to euthanasia the mice (n = 16) were given an i.p. injection of 80 mg/kg BrdU (Sigma) in PBS. Following euthanasia and the eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (PB).

Staining of cryosections and whole mount tissues

For conventional immunostaining, cryosections (10 µm thickness) were used. For the whole mount immunostaining, corneas were incubated with conjugated antibody in 0.3% Triton X-100 buffered solution overnight; for whole mount BrdU immunostaining, the whole cornea was treated by 4N HCl for 30 min, washed with PBS at room temperature, and then incubated with conjugated anti-BrdU antibody in 0.3% Triton X- 100 buffered solution overnight. After incubation, corneas were washed in 0.02% Triton X-100 in PBS for 3 to 6 hours followed by washing in PBS overnight. Finally, the corneas were mounted on slides with Mowiol medium for confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Western blotting

A cornea was cut into small pieces under a stereomicroscope and suspended in 100 µl alkali extraction buffer containing 250 u/ml Benzonase nuclease (Novagen, WI) and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 50 mM Tris (NaOH) pH 12 at 4°C overnight. After being clarified by centrifugation, the supernatant was neutralized with 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH = 6.0) to pH 7–8 and digested in 0.5 u/ml Keratanase at 37°C overnight. The protein was separated on a 4–20% SDS-PAGE mini gel and then transferred to an immobilon transfer membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The membrane was subjected to western blot analysis as described previously (45). Immune reactivity was visualized with DAB (secondary peroxidase conjugates) or with fluorescence imaging (secondary fluorescence conjugates) using Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska).

Apoptotic analysis

Cryosections were processed by proteinase K solution and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then subjected to TUNEL assay with DeadEndTM Fluorometric kit (Promega Corp, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, after incubation with equilibration buffer, the specimens were incubated in a solution of Nucleotide Mix and rTdT enzyme in equilibration buffer at 37°C; and then unincorporated fluorescein-12-dUTP was removed by washing with PBS. The number of green fluorescence-labeled cells in the specimen was then determined.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-side paired or non-paired student's t-test was used to compare the mean values of two sets of data. ANOVA tests were used to analyze the mean values of multiple group data. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Dr. Mindy Call for her assistance in the preparation and proof reading the manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: Bionet Corp. is a funder and has provided resources for the preparation of umbilical mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells used in the present study. The authors confirm that this affiliation does not alter their adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Funding: This study was in part supported by grants NIH/NEI EY 011845, EY016663, Research to Prevent Blindness Inc. and Ohio Lions Eye Res. Foundation. Dr. Martin Sieber and Mr. John Chang are employees of Bionet Corp., Taipei, Taiwan. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, except the initial characterizations of the stem cells.

References

1. Darabi R, Gehlbach K, Bachoo RM, Kamath S, Osawa M, et al. Functional skeletal muscle regeneration from differentiating embryonic stem cells. Nature Medicine. 2008;14:134–143. [PubMed]
2. Fraidenraich D, Stillwell E, Romero E, Wilkes D, Manova K, et al. Rescue of cardiac defects in Id knockout embryos by injection of embryonic stem cells. Science. 2004;306:247–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001;410:701–705. [PubMed]
4. Brazelton TR, Rossi FMV, Keshet GI, Blau HM. From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. Science. 2000;290:1775–1779. [PubMed]
5. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keenek CD, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–49. [PubMed]
6. Lee J, Jeyakumar M, Gonzalez R, Takahashi H, Lee P, et al. Stem cells act through multiple mechanisms to benefit mice with neurodegenerative metabolic disease. Nature Medicine. 2007;13:439–447. [PubMed]
7. Zakrzewski JL, Kochman AA, Lu SX, Terwey TH, Kim TD, et al. Adoptive transfer of T-cell precursors enhances T-cell reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nature Medicine. 2006;12:1039–1047. [PubMed]
8. Camargo FD, Green R, Capetenaki Y, Jackson KA, Goodell MA. Single hematopoietic stem cells generate skeletal muscle through myeloid intermediates. Nature Medicine. 2003;9:1520–1527. [PubMed]
9. Miyahara Y, Nagaya N, Kataoka M, Yanagawa B, Tanaka K, et al. Monolayered mesenchymal stem cells repair scarred myocardium after myocardial infarction. Nature Medicine 12: 2006;459 – 465 [PubMed]
10. Aurich I, Mueller LP, Aurich H, Luetzkendorf J, Tisljar K, et al. Functional integration of hepatocytes derived from human mesenchymal stem cells into mouse livers. Gut. 2007;56:405–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for non-hematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276:71–74. [PubMed]
12. Haniffa MA, Collin MP, Buckley CD, Dazzi F. Mesenchymal stem cells: the fibroblasts' new clothes? Haematologica. 2009;94:258–263. [PubMed]
13. Mobasheri A, Csaki C, Clutterbuck AL, Rahmanzadeh M, Shakibaei M. Mesenchymal stem cells in connective tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: applications in cartilage repair and osteoarthritis therapy. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:347–366. [PubMed]
14. Nadri S, Soleimani M, Kiani J, Atashi A, Izadpanah R. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human eye conjunctiva stromal cells. Differentiation. 2008;76:223–231. [PubMed]
15. Ikehara S. The future of stem cell transplantation in autoimmune disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009 doi July21:10.1007/s12016-009-8159-5.
16. Popp FC, Eggenhofer E, Renner P, Geissler EK, Piso P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells can affect solid organ allograft survival. Transplantation. 2009;87:S57–62. [PubMed]
17. Dai LJ, Li HY, Guan LY, Ritchie G, Zhou JX. The therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on hepatic cirrhosis. Stem Cell Res. 2009;2:16–25. [PubMed]
18. Chhabra P, Brayman KL. The use of stem cells in kidney disease. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009;14:72–78. [PubMed]
19. Kitada M, Dezawa M. Induction system of neural and muscle lineage cells from bone marrow stromal cells; a new strategy for tissue reconstruction in degenerative diseases. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:631–642. [PubMed]
20. Lasala GP, Minguell JJ. Bone marrow-derived stem/progenitor cells: their use in clinical studies for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18:171–180. [PubMed]
21. Vaquero J, Zurita M. Bone marrow stromal cells for spinal cord repair: a challenge for contemporary neurobiology. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:107–116. [PubMed]
22. D'Ippolito G, Schiller PC, Ricordi C, Roos BA, Howard GA. Age-related osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal stem cells from human vertebral bone marrow. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1115–1122. [PubMed]
23. Rao MS, Mattson MP. Stem cells and aging; expanding the possibilities. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122:713–734. [PubMed]
24. Tsai PC, Fu TW, Chen YM, Ko TL, Chen TH, et al. The therapeutic potential of human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells from Wharton's jelly in the treatment of rat liver fibrosis. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:484–495. [PubMed]
25. Yang CC, Shih YH, Ko MH, Hsu SY, Cheng H, et al. Transplantation of Human Umbilical Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Wharton's Jelly after Complete Transection of the Rat Spinal Cord. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10):e3336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003336. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Wagner W, Wein F, Seckinger A, Frankhauser M, Wirkner U, et al. Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:1402–1416. [PubMed]
27. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglasa R, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 284:143–147. [PubMed]
28. Moffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005;33:642–657. [PubMed]
29. Garg P, Krishna PV, Stratis AK, Gopinathan U. The value of corneal transplantation in reducing blindness. Eye. 2005;19:1106–1114. [PubMed]
30. Kao WW, Funderburgh JL, Xia Y, Liu CY, Conrad GW. Focus on molecules: lumican. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:3–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Saika S, Shiraishi A, Liu CY, Funderburgh JL, Kao CW, et al. Role of lumican in the corneal epithelium during wound healing. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:2607–2612. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass JH. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:1277–1286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Kassis I, Zangi L, Rivkin R, Levdansky L, Samuel S, et al. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from G-CSF-mobilized human peripheral blood using fibrin microbeads. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2006;37:967–976. [PubMed]
34. Chen J, Wang C, Lü S, Wu J, Guo X, et al. In vivo chondrogenesis of adult bone-marrow-derived autologous mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;319:429–438. [PubMed]
35. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J. Hematother. 1996;5:213–226. [PubMed]
36. Jester JV, Ghee Lee Y, Li J, Chakravarti S, Paul J, et al. Measurement of corneal sublayer thickness and transparency in transgenic mice with altered corneal clarity using in vivo confocal microscopy. Vision Res. 2001;41:1283–1290. [PubMed]
37. Chakravarti S, Petroll WM, Hassell JR, Jester JV, Lass JH, et al. Corneal opacity in lumican-null mice: defects in collagen fibril structure and packing in the posterior stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3365–3373. [PubMed]
38. Han M, Giese G, Bille JF. Second harmonic generation imaging collagen fibrils in cornea and sclera. Optics Express. 1991;13:5791–5797. [PubMed]
39. Morishige N, Petroll WM, Nishida T, Kenney MC, Jester JV. Noninvasive corneal stromal collagen imaging using two-photon-generated second-harmonic signals. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1784–1791. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Raimondo S, Penna C, Pagliaro P, Geuna S. Morphological characterization of GFP stably transfected adult mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells. J Anat. 2006;208:3–12. [PubMed]
41. Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110:3499–3506. [PubMed]
42. Liu CY, Birk DE, Hassel JR, Kane B, Kao WW. Keratocan-deficient mice display alterations in corneal structure. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:21672–21677. [PubMed]
43. Joseph A, Hossain P, Jham S, Jones RE, Tighe P, et al. Expression of CD34 and L-selectin on human corneal keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4689–4692. [PubMed]
44. Espana EM, Kawakita T, Liu CY, Tseng SCG. CD-34 expression by cultured human keratocytes is downregulated during myofibroblast differentiation induced by TGF-β1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;45:2985–2991. [PubMed]
45. Carlson EC, Liu CY, Chikama T, Hayashi Y, Kao CK, et al. Keratocan, a Cornea-specific Keratan Sulfate Proteoglycan, Is Regulated by Lumican. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25541–25547. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Carlson EC, Lin M, Liu CY, Kao WW, Perez VL, et al. Keratocan and lumican regulate neutrophil infiltration and corneal clarity in lipopolysaccharide-induced keratitis by direct interaction with CXCL1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:35502–35509. [PubMed]
47. Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, Dohlman CH. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007;47:61–71. [PubMed]
48. Myung D, Duhamel PE, Cochran JR, Noolandi J, Ta CN, et al. Development of hydrogel-based keratoprostheses: a materials perspective. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24:735–741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Du Y, Carlson EC, Funderburgh ML, Birk DE, Pearlman E, et al. Stem cell therapy restores transparency to defective murine corneas. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1635–1642. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Nasef A, Ashammakhi N, Fouillard L. Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stromal cells: possible mechanisms. Regen Med. 2008;3:531–546. [PubMed]
51. Moioli EK, Clark PA, Chen M, Dennis JE, Erickson HP, et al. Synergistic actions of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in vascularizing bioengineered tissues. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(12):e3922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003922. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Isaikina Y, Shman T. Influence of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow of children with oncohematological diseases on proliferation and self-renewal of hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Exp Oncol. 2008;30:121–128. [PubMed]
53. Ren G, Zhang L, Zhao X, Xu G, Zhang Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression occurs via concerted action of chemokines and nitric oxide. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:141–150. [PubMed]
54. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Measurement of tissue thickness using confocal microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 1999;307:230–245. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science