PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Fire Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Fire Technol. 2010 April 1; 46(2): 275–289.
doi:  10.1007/s10694-008-0070-8
PMCID: PMC2873202
NIHMSID: NIHMS122218

Recent Advances in Cigarette Ignition Propensity Research and Development

Abstract

Major U.S. cigarette companies for decades conducted research and development regarding cigarette ignition propensity which has continued beyond fire safety standards for cigarettes that have recently been legislated. This paper describes recent scientific advances and technological development based on a comprehensive review of the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences, public health, and trade literature, U.S. and international patents, and research in the tobacco industry document libraries.

Advancements since the first implementation of standards have made been in: a) understanding the key parameters involved in cigarette smoldering combustion and ignition of substrates; b) developing new cigarette and paper wrapper designs to reduce ignition propensity, including banded and non-banded cigarette paper approaches, c) assessing toxicology, and d) measuring performance. While the implications of manufacturers’ non-safety related aims are of concern, this research indicates possible alternative designs should experience with fire loss and existing technologies on the market suggest need for improvement.

Keywords: ignition propensity, smoldering combustion, oxygen transfer, cigarette extinction test, consumer product safety

1. Introduction

Cigarettes and other lighted tobacco products are a leading cause of fire deaths and fire-related injuries in the U.S. and throughout the world. Estimated costs of smoking material caused fires in the U.S. in 2005 were 82,400 fires, 800 civilian deaths, 1,660 civilian injuries, $575 million in direct property damages and other economic loss including health care costs, lost productivity, and use of fire and emergency services. [1] A significant proportion of the deaths, injuries and destruction of property could be prevented through the introduction of fire safety standards for cigarettes, which would require cigarettes to be either self-extinguishing, i.e. would go out when not actively puffed, or have altered smoldering characteristics making a fire less likely. Twenty-seven states, Canada, and Australia have mandated ignition performance standards for cigarettes modeled after New York’s Fire Safety Standards for Cigarettes, which was implemented in 2004. New Zealand, South Africa and members of the European Union are also moving towards cigarette fire safety legislation modeled after the standard used by the state of New York with planned introduction in some countries as early as 2009.

A Technical Study Group convened by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission under auspices of The Cigarette Safety Act of 1984 reported to Congress in 1987 that developing a cigarette with a minimum ignition propensity was technically and apparently economically feasible. [2] In 1990, the Technical Study Group was renamed the Technical Advisory Group and given the primary mandate of developing tests to establish standards for reducing the ignition propensity of cigarettes. This group conducted a regression analysis that showed that the cigarette characteristics filter length, porosity, and pack type were associated with cigarette fire incidence rates, when controlling for smoker characteristics. [3]

The New York performance standard requires that a cigarette brand exhibit no more than 25% full-length burns on 40 tests by the Cigarette Extinction Test (CET) method, which was developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and adapted and published by American Society of Testing and Materials as ASTM E2187 Standard Test Method for Measuring the Ignition Strength of Cigarettes. Cigarettes that are designed to comply with this standard are commonly referred to as reduced ignition propensity cigarettes and have been shown to have a lower statistical probability of igniting upholstered furniture mockups. [4]

The New York performance standard does not require any particular cigarette design for achieving reduced ignition propensity. Numerous approaches have been pursued over more than 80 years of combined industry research and government research focusing on relations between cigarette design features, the thermo-physical properties of the smoldering cigarettes, and cigarette ignition propensity, and over 300 patents obtained despite industry public comments that fire safe cigarettes were not feasible. The major U.S. cigarette companies, Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard each had extensive testing programs that began in the late 1970s or early 1980s. [5] While over 90% of the cigarettes brands sold in the U.S. were certified by the New York Office of Fire Prevention and Control as compliant upon implementation of the performance standard in 2004, the tobacco industry has since continued its cigarette ignition propensity research and development.

The aims of ongoing industry research have been to: 1) advance the fundamental understanding of cigarette combustion and ignition of substrates; 2) identify new technologies that may be useful in designs for reducing cigarette ignition propensity; 3) improve manufacturing and quality assurance processes for producing reduced ignition propensity cigarettes; 4) identify potential improvements in reduced ignition propensity performance measurement; and 5) pursue consumer satisfaction and other non-safety-related commercial concerns so that sales will not be lowered. Since the effectiveness of existing standards for reducing fires and fire losses has yet to be determined based on population data, and new advances in ignition propensity research could potentially lead to less ignition-prone cigarettes than those on the market, a comprehensive review is needed of the state-of-the-art in cigarette ignition propensity research and development. This paper summarizes the science of cigarette ignition propensity prior to the New York performance standard, and describes the recent advances in research and technological development following the New York performance standard based on a systematic review of the public health, scientific, technological, trade literatures and internal industry information made available to the public following the Master Settlement Agreement between U.S. states and tobacco companies.

2. Methods

A comprehensive multidisciplinary review was conducted of the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences, and public health literature in addition to U.S. and international patents, and trade literature pertaining to the tobacco and pulp and paper manufacturing industries. Information sources researched were: abstracting and indexing databases (Chemical Abstracts®, Applied Science and Technology Abstracts®, Academic Search Premier®, Science Citation Index®, Pubmed®, and Web of Science®), issued patents and patent applications databases available from the United States Patent and Trademark Office [6] and the World Intellectual Property Organization (PatentScope®) [7]; business and trade literature (OneSource®, Factiva®, LexisNexis Academic®, Business Source Complete®, Thomson Research®), an annual reports database (Mergent®), and internal industry documents in the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library [8] and the British American Tobacco Documents Archive [9] (each containing more than 6–8 million documents created by major tobacco companies related to their advertising, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and scientific research activities. Information research was conducted based on subject areas, keyword, and names of authors, other persons, and organizations.

3. Reducing ignition propensity

3a. Smoldering combustion of cigarettes and ignition of substrates

The science of cigarette ignition propensity is based on an understanding of the thermo-physical properties of cigarette smoldering combustion described by Ohlemiller [10] and by Gann [11]. Smoldering combustion is a flameless, slow, low-temperature, oxidation of the tobacco rod and the paper wrapper in a burning cigarette not being actively smoked. [10] It is sustained by heat generated by the oxidation and thermal degradation of the tobacco and the paper wrapper at the thermal front, or burning ember, of the cigarette. The burning cigarette requires continued transfer of oxygen to the coal as oxygen within the tobacco rod is depleted. Oxygen is transferred from the surrounding air by diffusion across the paper wrapper by the force of partial pressure and by convection through the spaces between discrete pieces of tobacco in the rod. [10, 11]

A smoldering process is generated in substrate materials such as the fabric of upholstered furniture when the smoldering cigarette remains in contact long enough to heat the substrate to its ignition threshold temperature. [12] The distribution of the thermal field and the surrounding partial pressure of oxygen determine whether the substrate material continues smoldering combustion or transitions to flaming combustion. The latter occurs when the gases released by pyrolysis of the cigarette mix with surrounding oxygen in flammable concentrations and a heat flux raises this mixture’s temperature above its threshold for ignition. [10, 12]

3b. Cigarette ignition propensity

Since heat transport within a cigarette is a function of static burn rates, most approaches to lowering cigarette ignition propensity aim to modify the rates sufficiently to result in self-extinguishment prior to the cigarette’s ignition of a substrate. The heat impinging on the substrate is a function of the mass burn rate, the effective heat of combustion of the cigarette, the nature of the contact of the cigarette with the substrate, and the area, temperature, and shape of the cigarette coal. The linear burn rate is an indicator of how fast the cigarette coal moves, and reflects the length of time that heat flux impinges on given point on the substrate. [10, 14] All other things being equal, cigarette heat output increases with higher mass burn rate (a faster burning cigarette) [15], while a high linear burn rate exposes the substrate to a shorter period of more intense heat. [13]

Philip Morris scientists noted in 1977 that burn rates are primarily affected by cigarette paper wrapper attributes (porosity and burn additives), tobacco characteristics (type, cut width, additives, and moisture content), and cigarette construction (tobacco rod geometry and density). [16] Theoretical modeling of the relationship between cigarette design and smoldering suggests that aside from paper wrapper properties, cigarette circumference is the primary factor affecting mass burn rate, and tobacco density is the primary factor affecting linear burn rate, heat flux, and the total heat released. [17] The Technical Study Group similarly found the factors associated with ignition propensity to be paper wrapper properties such as permeability and porosity; chemical additives such as citrate, whose role is purportedly to have the paper burn at the same rate as the tobacco column, other additives to the tobacco; cigarette circumference; and tobacco density. [2]

3c. Role of the cigarette paper wrapper

Industry’s main focus in the technological development of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes has been the composition and construction of the paper wrapper, particularly with respect to reducing permeability in order to reduce mass burn rate. Paper wrapper permeability regulates the diffusion of oxygen from outside of the cigarette to the inside and is thereby a major determinant of ignition propensity. The diffusive capacity of the paper wrapper, i.e. its resistance to the flow of an electric current when immersed in a non-aqueous solution of electrolyte and placed between two electrodes, has been found to be a direct indication of cigarette static burn rate and ability to sustain continuous smoldering combustion. [1820] Cigarette paper wrappers’ inherent permeability is based on composition and thickness, and is commonly designated in CORESTA units, measured in terms of volumetric flow rate of air (cm3/min) per unit area of paper (cm2) per unit pressure drop of water. [21] Paper filler materials such as CaCO3 are used in some designs to provide either relatively high or low permeability depending on median particle size, and methods for calibrating filler concentrations and particle size in order to achieve designated paper wrapper permeability are described in a number of patents. [22, 23]

Various designs for reducing ignition propensity incorporate in the paper wrapper burn altering chemical additives, which can either accelerate or retard burn rate, such as potassium citrate and other alkali metal salts, metals, or metal oxides [24]or permeability reducing constituents, such as additional paper, cellulose [25, 26], or aqueous film-forming solutions (e.g., alginate, starch, tapioca, carrageenan, guar gum, pectin) [27, 28], or various other polymers. Burn altering constituents are used either singly or in conjunction with paper permeability modifiers. [29] An early reduced ignition propensity cigarette design for example added potassium citrate in discrete amounts to paper that had a low diffusive capacity and inability to burn which was made by enhanced flax refining and adjustment of CaCO3 content. [30] The potassium citrate caused the paper cellulose structure to begin to degrade at a lower temperature, increased the width of paper burn line, and allowed more oxygen to reach the coal and sustain smoldering combustion. Cigarette paper wrappers such as roll-your-own and small cigars are made without burn promoters and normally result in self-extinguishment apart from any other design modification. [31]

3d. Banded cigarette paper approaches

The most frequently patented and commonly recognized reduced ignition propensity design is cigarette paper banding in which circumferential bands generally comprised of permeability reducing substances such as those described above are placed periodically along the rod. Band permeability has a direct correlation with cigarette self-extinguishment rates [32]. Bands may reduce ignition propensity by disrupting heat transfer to an underlying substrate. [33] Theoretical analyses and empirical research have demonstrated that self-extinguishment rates are related to the porosity of the non-banded paper regions in banded paper, width and location of the bands, and additives used for other purposes as well such ash appearance. [3436] Banded paper wrapper designs often also incorporate in the paper alkali metal burn promoters, burn retardants, and calcium carbonate fillers of various sizes and proportions.

Two methods are generally used in the manufacture of banded cigarette paper: a) water-or solvent-based print banding, in which film forming materials are typically applied using gravure or flexographic printing; and b) water-based paper banding, an online process in which additional cellulose fibers or paper are added as a fibrous slurry. [14, 32] Early development and commercialization of banded paper technologies was carried out by Kimberly-Clark Corporation and its later spin-off Schweitzer Mauduit International, and by PM. [36, –38] PM’s PaperSelect® wrapper used in its Merit® brand cigarettes beginning in 2000 is the first known banded cigarette paper on the market and was made with cellulose fiber bands. [39] These cigarettes anteceded New York’s Fire Safety Standards for Cigarettes and were therefore not designed to meet reduced ignition propensity requirements. Schweitzer Mauduit International has patented a water-based print banding paper method that is intended for cigarettes to comply with reduced ignition propensity standards. This technology uses a film-forming alginate water-based solution, such as sodium or potassium alginate. [40]

RJ Reynolds has developed alternative banded paper approaches using a) formulations of inulins and/or guar guam [41]; b) two or more layers of bands, consisting of ethylcellulose or another film-forming material; and c) calcium carbonate [42] or magnesium hydroxide filler materials. [43, 44] Lorillard has patented a banded paper approach using polybasic organic acid or other film- forming compounds in the band which also act to restrict the flow of air to the burning coal. [45]

3e. Non-banded cigarette paper approaches

RJ Reynolds and Brown & Williamson prior to its acquisition by RJ Reynolds developed non-banded paper wrapper approaches that rely on longitudinal, or co-axial, orientation of permeability-reducing materials with respect to the tobacco column, [4648] in contrast to the circumferential orientation of paper banding. Specific longitudinal designs include: a) double wrapping of the tobacco rod in layers of regular cigarette paper and/or paper made from reconstituted tobacco; b) partial double wrapping of the paper wrapper by widening the region along the tobacco rod where the wrapper overlaps at the seam; and c) adding strips of reconstituted tobacco sheets to the interior of the wrapper.

4. Other research and development goals

4a. Assessing toxicology

A concern has been the possibility that reduced ignition propensity cigarette designs may result in changes in exposure to smokers due to burn temperature, changes in emissions, or smoker behavior and topography. Internal testing by Philip Morris and other companies found that banded cigarettes were substantially the same as regular cigarettes on a number of important measures of toxicology, including a range of chemical and biological assays despite decades of industry claims the reduced ignition propensity cigarettes would cause more harm [4951]. Under the Fire-Safe Cigarette Act of 1990, the National Institute for Standards and Technology found no significant differences in levels of tar, nicotine, and CO in the smoke of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes brand and those of fourteen best selling commercial cigarette brand types. [4] Two recent scientific publications by RJ Reynolds, a company that had long opposed reduced ignition propensity regulations claiming increased risk, reported that toxicological testing of cigarettes representative of current marketed banded cigarette paper technologies show no significant differences. [52, 53] Academic researchers at Harvard School of Public Health and Roswell Memorial Cancer Institute evaluated the effects of switching smokers from a conventional cigarette to an reduced ignition propensity version of their current brand and found no significant changes in numbers of cigarettes smoked or increases in carbon monoxide exposure. [54]

4b. Non safety-related goals

Industry research and development pertaining to cigarette ignition propensity generally include a range of commercial non-ignition propensity and non-safety-related aims. These typically aim to maximize consumer acceptability in terms of: a) maintaining the cigarette in a burning state when not in contact with a substrate; b) improving or optimizing the taste of the cigarette; c) masking the perception of secondhand smoke; d) providing appealing ash properties of the cigarette, such as white appearance and uniformity; and e) minimizing the cost of production.

Maintenance of the cigarette in a burning state when not in contact with a substrate is typically measured as the free-air self-extinguishment rate. Cigarettes with low free-air self extinguishment rate are intended to appeal to consumers by minimizing the need for relighting, even though this feature would not serve to reduce ignition propensity or promote fire safety. Recent Schweitzer Mauduit International patents describe the use of film-forming substances in combination with burn promoting agents with the aim to lower the rate of free-air self-extinguishment, and improve the taste, uniformity, and ash properties of the cigarette while reducing ignition propensity. [40, 55] Free-air self extinguishment rate is lowered in these patents by the inclusion of a burn promoter such as citrate in the film-forming composition used for the bands. One Rothman’s and Benson & Hedges patent has the aim to maintain the cigarette free-burn for up to two minutes even when the cigarette is set down on a surface. [24] A metal oxide is used in this patent in order to sustain smoldering combustion in lower permeability regions of the paper for a designated period of time or until the burning reaches a higher permeability region. [24] A Lorillard patent also describes the use of a combination of burn additives, burn retardants, and permeability reducing substances, such as polysaccharides, aiming to minimize free-air self extinguishment rates and provide uniform smoke taste and perception while reducing ignition propensity. [29]

Additional non-safety related goals pertain to efficiency and economics of production. PM’s Moving Orifice Device for example is equipment designed to apply uniform and continuous fiber slurry bands while using an optical inspection to inspect, measure, and control band width and spacing. [56, 57] The effect on cigarette ignition propensity of manufacturing processes to provide band uniformity has not been demonstrated. Inventors with a firm Mebtec Technology, Inc. have patented an alternative method for controlled placement of brands and claim that a cigarette with a single band of zero porosity or two such bands can increase self-extinguishment rates to 100%. [58, 59].

4c. Performance measurement

The New York performance standard uses the ASTM 2187-04 based on the Cigarette Extinction Test first developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Cigarette Extinction Test determines whether a cigarette laying on multiple layers of filter paper acting as a heat absorbing substrate generates enough heat to continue burning without self-extinguishing. [4] National Institute of Standards and Technology reported that both the CET, and an alternative measure of ignition propensity, the Mock-Up Ignition Method, produced similar results for routine measurement of the propensity of cigarettes to ignite soft furnishings. [4, 60] Performance under both methods was linked with reduced ignition behavior in full-scale real fabric upholstered furniture. [61]

Manufacturers have explored the use of infrared imaging for cigarette ignition propensity research and development and performance measurement. Infrared imaging provides a direct measure of radiant coal power, i.e. the heat energy radiated per unit time, from a cigarette in non-contact free smolder. Advantages of infrared imaging for measuring temperature include: a) avoiding physical contact which could affect precision of measurement, b) providing full-field, direct measurement of radiant power, and c) rapidity. Philip Morris used radiant coal power measurements by infrared imaging to develop a semi-empirical model of ignition propensity and found agreement between the percentages of total burns predicted by the model and cigarette ignition propensity as measured by the Cigarette Extinction Test and proposed using the semi-empirical model to increase reliability and efficiency of measuring cigarette ignition propensity. [61]

5. Recent advanced research and development

Cigarette manufacturers’ and pulp and paper suppliers’ ongoing research has included development of various mathematical and computer-based models to understand the factors related to cigarette ignition propensity and smoldering. Muramatsu [62] and by Eitzinger and Pirker [63] recently reviewed modeling approaches taken since the earliest theoretical research by Sir Alfred Egerton in 1962. [64]. One model formulated by Japan Tobacco International scientists is based on the assumptions that the interaction between tobacco shreds and the paper wrapper plays an important role in the burning cigarette and that the burn rate at the cigarette periphery controls burning propagation. [65] Burn propagation in the Japan Tobacco International model consists of these steps: a) The paper wrapper burns continuously until it is extinguished at the point where the paper makes contact with the tobacco shreds, charring the paper and the tobacco; b) An oxidation reaction then begins in the tobacco shreds below the burnt paper and generates heat; c) The paper wrapper near the charred point is then heated by the burning tobacco shreds and ignites. Japan Tobacco International researchers concluded that the rate of temperature increase near the charred line and the time required to ignite the charred paper is the rate-determining step.

A mathematical model of cigarette smoldering recently developed by Philip Morris scientists predicts linear burn rate and temperature and density profiles in the pyrolysis zone of a smoldering cigarette and estimates the coal length and the maximum coal temperatures during free smoldering. [66] Philip Morris proposed that the model could serve as a tool for exploring important parameters of the cigarette smoldering processes, including heat generation in the burning zone and its dependence on the mass burn rate.

Muramatsu of the Tobacco Institute of Japan [62] and scientists at WFT Research, a paper manufacturer affiliated with Trierenberg [63] developed other mathematical models of cigarette smoldering including simulation of the thermodynamics of cigarettes during smoldering and puffing in free air and when lying on a substrate and prediction of linear burn rate. This model suggests that low diffusion coefficients are required for high self-extinguishment rates in print-banded papers.

RJ Reynolds scientists recently developed an apparatus for testing printed bands and measuring the gas diffusion capacity of cigarette paper. They found that the gas diffusion coefficient is an intrinsic property of paper independent of the paper thickness and concluded that both the diffusion coefficient and thickness of the paper can contribute to burn rate and ignition propensity. [18] They also observed that the diffusion capacity of paper was determined by small pores which are occluded by low permeability bands, and found that diffusion capacity values varied much less than permeability measurements.

Philip Morris S.A. (in Switzerland) obtained a 2007 patent for a “slit-banded paper” approach to reducing cigarette ignition propensity in which the banded regions of the paper have “gaps” of higher permeability situated between discrete areas of lower permeability. [67] The lower permeability areas of the bands are comprised of constituents typical of other banded papers, while the higher permeability “slits” have perforations that become occluded by a filler material which melts when in proximity to the burning coal, creating a zone with increased permeability. The patent notes that various banding configurations of this design exhibited average full-length burn rates of 2.5% or less, although the cigarette with a certain banding configuration (three 2 mm zones of low permeability separated by 1 mm zones of higher permeability) exhibiting the highest full-length burn rate was considered to provide the best results since its free-air self extinguishment rate was the lowest (20%). [67]

RJ Reynolds recently further developed its non-banded paper approach by using longitudinal inner wrapper strips comprised of alkali metal salts, such as sodium alginate or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. [68] The alkali metal content was noted to be correlated with higher self-extinguishment rates and higher threshold ignition temperatures; cigarettes with strips having sodium content greater than 27.2 mg per gm generally exhibited 80% or greater self-extinguishments. [68]

Miquel Y Costas & Miquel, a cigarette paper manufacturer in Spain obtained a recent patent for reducing paper wrapper permeability with a gum arabic or acacia gum coating on the internal side of the wrapper applied either over the total surface area or in bands, and use of fire-retardant filler such as aluminum hydroxide, calcium sulfate, or magnesium hydroxide. [69]

A researcher at University of Jena in Germany obtained a recent patent for a cigarette designed to meet the ASTM E2187-04 standard with an alternative approach to paper wrapper modification. [70] The tobacco is mixed with dihydrate calcium sulfate or gypsum which dehydrates from the heat of the burning cigarette releasing water from the endothermic reaction and lowering the temperature from between 742 and 863°C to between 610 and 691°C.

6. Reduced ignition propensity cigarette and paper market

Eighteen percent of the cigarettes sold in North America are now produced with reduced ignition propensity cigarette paper according to Schweitzer Mauduit International, and the proportion is expected to rise to 40% with increasing legislation by the third quarter of 2008 and to national distribution by as early as 2010. [71] The cigarette paper industry has recently consolidated, with ignition propensity remaining an active and competitive area of research and development. Schweitzer Mauduit International’s banded papers using water-based alginate solution and the burn promoter citrate are currently sold on the market under the trade name Alginex. [72] Although the companies that use this paper if any are not known, Schweitzer Mauduit International presently has an exclusive supply arrangement with Philip Morris USA obligating the cigarette company to purchase their jointly-developed reduced ignition propensity paper for 100 percent of its banded cigarette paper requirements for a minimum period of seven years. [71] Schweitzer Mauduit International is also obligated by this agreement to supply the paper to Philip Morris USA for a minimum of thirteen years. [71]

RJ Reynolds and Lorillard reportedly had in-house reduced ignition propensity cigarette technologies at the time the New York law came into effect and they may now each be purchasing from Schweitzer Mauduit International and/or other paper suppliers. U.S. cigarette manufacturers have begun to commit to voluntarily compliance nationwide with reduced ignition propensity standards, including Nat Sherman (as of February, 2007), [73] New Century Tobacco Group (FACT brand as of June, 2007), [74] Liggett (as of January 2009) [75], and RJ Reynolds (as of end of 2009). [76]. Lorillard, Commonwealth, and Philip Morris are the largest U.S. cigarette manufacturers that have not yet made this commitment possibly due to complications of distribution, and may soon follow. Cigarette paper manufacturers in Europe, such as MYC have recognized the potentially increasing demand from the emerging North American reduced ignition propensity cigarette paper market and the possibility of legislation mandating reduced ignition propensity cigarettes in the European Union. MYC announced plans to produce at least two varieties of reduced ignition propensity cigarette paper beginning in early 2009. [77] Other possible suppliers or entrants into the market include Trierenberg Holding Company in Austria, DelfortGroup, and Swiss Quality Paper (formerly Papierfabrik).

7. Summary and Conclusions

Following decades of research and development, cigarette and cigarette paper manufacturers were readily able to comply with cigarette ignition propensity standards by the time of first implementation in New York [2]. They have since continued to advance the scientific research of cigarette combustion and ignition propensity despite public claims that it is not possible. This article describes further advances that have been made with respect to: a) understanding the key parameters involved in cigarette combustion and ignition of substrates; b) developing new cigarette and paper wrapper designs for reduced ignition propensity; c) improving reduced ignition propensity cigarette manufacturing and quality assurance processes; and d) identifying infrared imaging as a potential enhancement for ignition propensity performance measurement.

Many of the cigarette ignition propensity approaches identified are designed around existing performance standards and include various other non-safety-related goals, such reducing free-air self extinguishment rate, improving taste characteristics and ash appearance, minimizing cost or other factors. The effects on fire safety of various goals related to the commercial interest of maintaining consumers are not determined.

Reduced ignition propensity cigarettes presently on the market all use a paper wrapper based approach, predominantly banded paper. The band composition and geometry may vary between products of the various manufacturers and the amounts of burn additives such as citrate, and other permeability reducing constituents, such as calcium carbonate filler also vary from brand to brand. An increasing number of potential approaches to reduce cigarette ignition propensity with potentially less fire risk are described in patents and the scientific literature.

Further research is needed to better define the relative roles of the common design parameters and to determine which technologies are most effective in reducing fires and fire losses. As population data become available to assess their effects further research should examine the relative effectiveness of reduced ignition propensity technologies on the market and to recommend changes in design or performance standards should they be needed.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research assistance of Vincent Panzano. Funding for this research was provided by U.S. National Cancer Institute Grant Number: R01 CA117108-01A1.

Contributor Information

Hillel R. Alpert, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark Building, Floor 3E, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02135, Email: ude.dravrah.hpsh@treplah, Telephone: 617-998-1086, Fax: 617-495-8543.

Richard J. O’Connor, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263.

Ron Spalletta, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark Building, Floor 3E, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02135.

Gregory N. Connolly, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark Building, Floor 3E, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02135.

References

1. Hall JR., Jr . The smoking-material fire problem. National Fire Protection Association; Quincy, MA: 2007.
2. Toward a Less Fire-Prone Cigarette: Final Report to the Congress (1987) Technical Study Group on Cigarette and Little Cigar Fire Safety, Cigarette Safety Act of 1984.
3. Harwood, B., Kissinger, T.L., Karter, Jr., M.J., Miller, A.L., Fahy, R.F., Hall, Jr., J.R., Eisenhower, D., Forbes, P., and Hall, J., “Cigarette Fire Incident Study,” Report No. 4, Technical Advisory Group, Fire Safe Cigarette Act of 1990, 1993.
4. Ohlemiller TJ, Villa KM, Braun E, et al. Test Methods for Quantifying the Propensity of Cigarettes to Ignite Soft Furnishings. National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg, MD: 1993. Special Publication 851.
5. Gunja M, Wayne G, Landman A, Connolly G, McGuire A. The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. Tob Control. 2002;11:346–353. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. United States Patent and Trade Office ( http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html)
7. World Intellectual Property Organization ( http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en)
8. Legacy Tobacco Industry Documents Library, University of California, San Francisco ( http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu)
9. British American Tobacco Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco ( http://bat.library.ucsf.edu)
10. Ohlemiller TJ. Smoldering Combustion. In: Dienno PM, et al., editors. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 2. 1995. Chapter 11, Section 2, 2/171–179.
11. Gann RC et al (1987) The Effect of Cigarette Characteristics on the Ignition of Soft Furnishings, Section 4: Thermophysics of the Ignition Process, Technical Study Group on Cigarette and Little Cigar Fire Safety, Center for Fire Research, National Bureau of Standards
12. Krasny JF (1987) Technical Study Group. Cigarette Ignition of Soft Furnishings a Literature Review with Commentary. Center for Fire Research, National Bureau of Standards.
13. Spears AW, Rhyne AL, Norman V. Factors for consideration in a test for cigarette ignition propensity on soft furnishings. J Fire Sci. 1996;13:59–84.
14. Ihrig A, Zawadzki M. An historical overview of cigarette ignition propensity research and patents. Lorillard Tobacco Company. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fire Safety; White Sulphur Springs, WV. 2002. pp. 147–173.
15. Waymack BE, Kellog DS, McRae DD, Dwyer RW. Watts in a cigarette: thermophysical properties of smoldering cigarettes. Tob Sci. 1997;41:74–81.
16. Resnik FE, Houck WG, Geiszler WA, Wickham JE. Factors Affecting Static Burning Rate. Tob Sci. 1977;26:103–107.
17. Yi SC, Song ES, Oh SG, Bae SY, Moon SK, Hajaligol MR. Theoretical Analysis of the Effects of Cigarette Design Parameters on the Smoldering Rates, Heat Flux, and Total Heat Released during Smoldering of a Cigarette. Journal of Fire Sciences. 2001;19:18–30.
18. Norman AB, Caudle JC, Henderson CW. Measurement of Gas Diffusion Capacity of Cigarette Papers. Contrib Tob Res. 2005;21:425–434.
19. Miura K. Oxygen Diffusion through cigarette paper. Contrib Tob Res. 2001;19:205–208.
20. Drake DG, Riley DS, Baker RR, Kilburn KD. On a cell to measure diffusion coefficients of gases through cigarette papers. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1980;23:127–134.
21. CORESTA Recommended Method No. 40 (1994). Determination of air permeability of materials used as cigarette papers, filter plug wrap and filter joining paper including materials having an oriented permeable zone..
22. Hampl V., Jr Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc, assignee. Method for Controlling the Permeability of a Paper. US patent 5888348. 1999 March 30; inventor.
23. Hampl V, Jr, Snow LD, Kraker T. Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc, assignee. Paper Wrapper for Reduction of Cigarette Burn Rate. US patent 6568403. 2003 May 27; inventors.
24. Finlay W, Snaidr SM. Rothmans Benson & Hedges Inc., assignee. A Low Ignition Propensity Cigarette Having an Oxygen Donor Metal Oxide in the Cigarette Wrapper. WIPO patent 2003/088771. 2003 October 30; inventors.
25. Peterson RM, Goodrow JH, Kucherovsky JS. Schweitzer-Mauduite International, assignee. Smoking Article Wrapper for Controlling Ignition Proclivity of a Smoking Article. US Patent 5878754. 1999 March 9; inventors.
26. Matthews JH, Durocher DF, Hampl V., Jr Kimberly-Clark Corporation, assignee. Reduced Ignition Proclivity Smoking Article Wrapper and Smoking Article. US Patent 4622983. 1986 November 18; inventors.
27. Baker RR, Green SJ, Kilburn D. Smoking Articles. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, assignee. US Patent 4077414. 1978 March 7; inventors.
28. Sherwood TS, Rasouli F, Li P, Miser DE, Mahajer JY, Waymack BE, Phan TA, Madison TL, Tilley JR, Pithawalla YB. Gravure-printed, Branded Cigarette Paper. US Patent Application US 2007/0102071. 2007 May 10; inventors.
29. Zawadski MA, et al. Lorillard Licensing Company, LLC, assignee, Reduced Ignition Propensity Smoking Article. US patent 6837248. 2005 January 4; inventors.
30. Schweitzer Papers For Cigarettes Which Self-Extinguish or Have Reduced Ignition Proclivity/324. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (1983) Research Development & Engineering Meeting Report, August 22, 1983. Bates No. 620348647-6849
31. Laugesen M, Duncanson M, Fraser T, McClellan V, Linehan B, Shirley R. Hand rolling cigarettes as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety. Tob Control. 2003;12:406–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Garg R, Reynolds B, Phan T. The development of banded cigarette paper to reduce fabric ignition propensity. Philip Morris USA, RD&E Operations Center; Richmond, VA: 2000. Bates number 2062954842–4849.
33. Zawadzki M, Ihrig A. Understanding the physical basis for effectiveness of reduced ignition propensity cigarettes in the marketplace. Presented at the 34th International Conference on Fire Safety; January 15, 2002; White Sulphur Springs, WV. 2002.
34. Eitzinger B. A simulation study of self-extinguishing cigarettes. Contrib to Tob Res. 2006;22:79–87.
35. Hirschler MM. Mathematical Models to Analyse the Effect of Physical Properties of Cigarettes on the Propensity of the Cigarette to Ignite Cellulosic Fabrics. Fire and Mater. 1997;21:33–39.
36. Goodman B, Greene R. (1983) Kimberly-Clark Wrappers. Philip Morris. September 7, 1983. Bates No. 1002814036/4046
37. Greene R. Ignition Propensity Study: Status Report. Philip Morris. October 14, 1981. Bates No. 1002800939/0940
38. Collins G. Paper Maker to Spin Off Tobacco Units. New York Times. 1995 May 10;
39. Philip Morris (2000) Philip Morris, U.S.A. Banded Cigarette Paper Licensing Offer. Philip Morris. September 26, 2000. Bates No. 2078403355/3514
40. Wanna JT. Free Air Burning Articles With Reduced Ignition Proclivity Characteristics. US Patent 2007/0295348. 2007 December 27;
41. Oglesby RL. Smoking articles and wrapping materials therefore. US Patent Application Publication No. US2007/0246055 A1. 2007 October 25; inventor.
42. Chapman PS, et al. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, assignee. Wrapping Materials for Smoking Articles. US patent 6976493. 2005 December 20; inventors.
43. RJ Reynolds (2001) Memorandum Re: Ignition Propensity Testing of PD9011-Redesign of Wattens Low Permeability Papers and Ecusta Magnesium Hydroxide Banded Paper. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. February 12, 2001. Bates No. 53287 8202
44. RJ Reynolds (2001) Memorandum Re: Ignition Propensity Testing of GN22818AA-AD, Ecusta Magnesium Hydroxide Banded Papers. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. May 22, 2001. Bates No. 53288 6079
45. Vello N, Ihrig AM. Loews Corporation, assignee. Smoking articles having a reduced free burn time. US Patent 4452259. 1984 June 5; inventors.
46. Fitzgerald J, Oglesby RL. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, assignee. Cigarette and Wrapping Materials Therefor. US Patent 7234471. 2007 June 26; inventors.
47. Wanna JT, Hicks DR. Cigarette with burn rate modification. US Patent 6827087. 2004 December 7; inventors.
48. Crooks EL, Taylor JN. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, assignee. Reduced ignition propensity smoking article. US Patent 6606999. 2003 August 19; inventors.
49. Patskan G, Hsu F, Meisgen T, Stabbert R, Vanscheeuwijck P, Veltel D. Toxicological Characterization of a Novel Cigarette Paper. The Toxicolog. 2000;54:398.
50. Appleton, Krautter GR, Lauterbach JH. Toxicological evaluation of a new cigarette paper designed for lowered ignition propensity. 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference.2003.
51. Misra M, Leverette RD, Hamm JT, Bennett MB, Heck JD, Morrissey R, Rajendran N. Toxicological evaluation of a cigarette paper with reduced ignition propensity: in vitro and in vivo tests. The Toxicolog. 2005;84(S-1):1186.
52. Theophilus EH, et al. Toxicological Evaluation of Cigarettes with Two Banded Cigarette Paper Technologies. Exp and Toxicolog Pathol. 2007;59(1):17–27. [PubMed]
53. Theophilus EH, et al. Comparative 13-week Cigarette Smoke Inhalation Study in Sprague-Dawley Rats: Evaluation of Cigarettes with Two Banded Cigarette Paper Technologies. Food and Chem Toxicolog. 2007;45:1076–1090. [PubMed]
54. Rees V, O’Connor RJ, Norton KJ. Short-Term Effects of Switching to Cigarettes With Reduced Ignition Propensity. Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; Portland, Oregon. February 27–March 1, 2008.2008.
55. Hampl V, Gu A, Rossi-Espagnet J. Wrappers For Smoking Articles Having Reduced Diffusion Leading to Reduced Ignition Proclivity Characteristics. US Patent Application 20080202542. 2008 August 28; inventors.
56. Philip Morris USA (2000) History of Project Tomorrow. July 6, 2000 Bates No. 2078402941
57. Guatam N, Lanzillotti HV, Murray TW, Phan DA, Butt Sr JR, Clark E, Dougherty TE Fillio TL, Hampl Jr. V, Ursery PL, Cutright EL, Edwards RL (1999) Method and Apparatus for Applying a Material to a Web. US Patent 5997691. December 7, 1999.
58. Jadot P, Badan C. Low Ignition Propensity (LIP) Paper Smoking Articles, inventors (2005). US Patent Application 2005/0172977, August 11, 2005.
59. Mebtec Technology, Inc. ( http://www.mebtec.com)
60. Gann RG, Steckler KD, Ruitberg S, Guthrie WF, Levenson MS (2001) Relative Ignition Propensity of Test Market Cigarettes: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Technical Note 1436
61. Sherwood TS, Isaac JC, Murthi RM, Wiedemann KE, Janardhan S, Jones JS. Semi-empirical model using radiant coal power to predict cigarette ignition strength as measured by extinction test. Fire Technol. 2006;42:233–251.
62. Muramatsu M. An Approach to Modeling a Burning Cigarette. Contrib Tob Res. 2005;21(5):286–293.
63. Eitzinger B, Pirker S. Numerical Simulation of a Cigarette during Smoking. Contrib Tob Res. 2005;21(7):402–416.
64. Egerton A, Gugan K, Weinberg FJ. The mechanism of smouldering in cigarettes. Combusti Flame. 1963;7:63–78.
65. Miura K, Kitao Y, Nishiyama N, Ueyama K. Propagation of cigarette static burn. Contrib Tob Res. 2001;19:277–287.
66. Chen P. A Mathematical Model of Cigarette Smoldering Process. Contrib Tob Res. 2002;20:265.
67. Garg RK, Phan TA. Philip Morris Products S.A., Slit banded paper. World Intellectual Property Organization. International Publication Number WO 2007 113693. 2007 November 11; inventors.
68. Mua JP, Arzonico BW, Clark MA, Monsalud LR, Norman AB, Schluter RD. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. Smoking articles comprising inner wrapping strips. US Patent Application US2007/0157940. 2007 July 12; inventors.
69. Fuentes AT, Ruigomez PD. Miquel Y. Costas & Miquel SA, assignee. Method of Preparing Paper for Self-Extinguishing Cigarettes. US patent 7219672. 2007 May 22; inventors Z.
70. Anger I. Fachhochschule Jena. Cigarette with reduced flammability, World Intellectual Property Organization. 2008 February 21;International Publication Number WO 2008/019646 A1 inventor.
71. Schweitzer-Mauduit International (2008) Form 10-K, United States Securities and Exchange Commision, March 7, 2008
72. Schweitzer Mauduit International. http://www.schweitzer-mauduit.com (Accessed May 2, 2008)
73. Shannon JM (2007) Hats off to Nat Sherman. National Fire Protection Association. http://nfpa.typepad.com/firesafecigarettes/2007/02/hats-off-to-nat.html (Accessed April 2, 2008)
74. New Century Tobacco Group (2008) New Century Tobacco Group to Launch Reduced Ignition Propensity Cigarette Paper Nationwide on its New FACT Brand of cigarettes. June 5, 2006. http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/06-05-2006/0004374755&EDATE= (Accessed April 16, 2008)
75. Vector Group Ltd (2008) Liggett Group To Make All Cigarettes Fire Standards Compliant. Vector Group Ltd. March 25, 2008. http://www.vectorgroupltd.com/newsArticleGroup.asp?pvNewsId=215 (Accessed April 2, 2008)
76. Shannon JM (2007) RJ Reynolds says it will make safer cigarettes. National Fire Protection Association. October 25, 2007. http://nfpa.typepad.com/firesafecigarettes/2007/10/rj-reynolds-say.html (Accessed April 2, 2008)
77. Miquel y Costas: la compania lanzara el papel ‘anti-incendio’. Expansion. June 27, 2007. p8