PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jvetsciJournal of Veterinary ScienceAbout J Vet SciInstructions to AuthorsSubmission of ManuscriptThis Article
 
J Vet Sci. 2007 March; 8(1): 21–25.
Published online 2007 March 31. doi:  10.4142/jvs.2007.8.1.21
PMCID: PMC2872693

Disposition kinetics and urinary excretion of cefpirome after intravenous injection in buffalo calves

Abstract

We investigated the disposition kinetics and urinary excretion of cefpirome in buffalo calves after a single intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg. Also, an appropriate dosage regimen was calculated. At 1 min after injection, the concentration of cefpirome in the plasma was 57.4 ± 0.72 µg/ml, which declined to 0.22 ± 0.01 µg/ml at 24 h. The cefpirome was rapidly distributed from the blood to the tissue compartment as shown by the high distribution coefficient values (8.67 ± 0.46/h), and by the drug's rate of transfer constant from the central to the peripheral compartment, K12 (4.94 ± 0.31/h). The elimination halflife and the volume of distribution were 2.14 ± 0.02 h and 0.42 ± 0.005 l/kg, respectively. Once the distribution equilibrium was reached between the tissues and plasma, the total body clearance (ClB) and the ratio of the drug present in the peripheral to the central compartment (T/P ratio) were 0.14 ± 0.002 l/kg/h and 1.73 ± 0.06, respectively. Based on the pharmacokinetic parameters we obtained, an appropriate intravenous cefpirome dosage regimen for treating cefpiromesensitive bacteria in buffalo calves would be 8.0 mg/kg repeated at 12 h intervals for 5 days, or until persistence of the bacterial infection occurred.

Keywords: buffalo, cefpirome, cephalosporins, dosage, pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Cefpirome is a cephalosporin that was recently introduced, and is frequently used for empirical therapy in severely ill patients in the intensive care, oncology, and transplantation units [20]. It has potent bactericidal activity against a broad range of gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus spp. It is also highly active against Haemophillus influenzae type B and many members of the Enterobacteriaceae family [3]. Cefpirome, however, does not target anaerobic bacteria; hence, it spares the intestinal flora, unlike other antibiotics [7]. The disposition kinetics of cefpirome have been investigated in humans [18], rabbits [13], rats [8], dogs [11], and monkeys [12]. However, there is no information available on cefpirome's pharmacokinetics in buffaloes. Given the marked species variations that are found in the kinetic data of antimicrobial drugs, the present study was undertaken to determine the disposition kinetics, urinary excretion, and appropriate dosage regimen for cefpirome in buffalo calves, following a single intravenous administration.

Materials and Methods

The experiment was performed on 5 healthy male buffalo calves, 6-12 months old and weighing 90-122 kg. The animals were adapted to the laboratory conditions for 2 weeks prior to the study's commencement, and were provided seasonal green fodder, wheat straw, and water ad libitum. The average daytime temperature in the shed was approximately 25[degree celsius] during the experimental period. The experimental protocol followed the ethical guidelines on the proper care and use of animals. Cefpirome (Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals, India) was administered at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg of body weight into the left jugular vein. Blood samples were then drawn from the contra lateral jugular vein into heparinized glass centrifuge tubes at 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 24 h after administration of drug. The plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm at room temperature and stored at -20[degree celsius] until analysis, which usually took place the day after collection.

To examine the urinary excretion of cefpirome, the same animals were placed into metabolic stalls designed in such a way that all the urine voided by the animals was collected without contamination or spillage. The urine samples were collected after predetermined time intervals of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 24 h after drug administration. The volume of urine was measured, and after filtration, 10 ml samples were taken for analysis.

The concentrations of cefpirome in the plasma and urine samples were determined by a standard microbiological bioassay technique [2] using Escherichia coli (MTCC 739) as the test organism. The test organisms were cultured on medium No. 1 at 37[degree celsius] for 24 h, and a suspension was prepared in sterile normal saline. The assay plates were prepared by putting a seed layer (25 ml) of medium No. 11 on the flat bottoms of assay Petri dishes that had 100 ml capacities. A desired amount of bacterial suspension was added to the seed layer to obtain clear bacterial growth and the required zone of inhibition dimensions using a cefpirome reference concentration of 0.25 µg/ml. Preliminary experiments were conducted to determine the actual amount of bacterial suspension to be used in the preparation of the seed layer. After solidification of the media, 6 wells were punched at equal distances using a punching machine (designed and standardized in our laboratory). Three alternating cylindrical wells were filled with one plasma or urine sample and the remaining 3 cylindrical wells were filled with a standard solution of cefpirome (0.25 µg/ml). These assay plates were incubated at 32[degree celsius] for 6 h. At the end of incubation the diameter of the zone of inhibition of each well was measured with Antibiotic Zone Reader (Fisher Scientific, USA). For each sample, 9 replicates were analyzed. This method could detect a minimum of 0.05 µg/ml of cefpirome.

The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated manually by the computed least-square linear regression technique [6]. Different estimates of the distribution volume were obtained from the following equation:

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is jvs-8-21-e001.jpg

The priming (D) and maintenance (D') doses of cefpirome at various dosage intervals for maintaining different MICs was calculated from the equations:

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is jvs-8-21-e002.jpg

Where β is the elimination rate constant, τ is the dosage interval, and Cp(min)[proportional, variant] is the minimum inhibitory concentration of cefpirome against common animal pathogens.

Results

The plasma levels of cefpirome at different time intervals are presented in Fig. 1. The plasma concentration of cefpirome at 1 min after a single intravenous injection was 57.4 ± 0.72 µg/ml, which declined rapidly to 13.5 ± 0.11 µg/ml at 1 h. The drug was detected in plasma for up to 24 h after dosing (0.22 ± 0.01 µg/ml). The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters that described the distribution and elimination pattern of cefpirome are presented in Table 1. Table 2 summarizes the urinary excretion data of cefpirome after a single intravenous administration. The optimum cefpirome doses were calculated using the various dosage intervals, the different desired plasma concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 µg/ml, and the values for β and Vdarea from Table 1. These optimum doses are presented in Table 3.

Fig. 1
Semilogarithmic plot of the plasma concentration-time profile of cefpirome in buffalo calves following a single intravenous dose of 10 mg/kg body weight. Values given are mean ± SE of 5 animals. The data were analyzed using a two-compartment open ...
Table 1
Disposition kinetic parameters of cefpirome in buffalo calves following a single intravenous administration
Table 2
Urinary excretion of cefpirome in healthy buffalo calves following a single intravenous administration
Table 3
Doses of cefpirome (mg/kg) at various intervals for different MICs in buffalo calves

Discussion

In buffalo calves, the disposition of cefpirome in plasma after IV administration was best described by a 2-compartment open pharmacokinetic model. Similarly, cefpirome was reported as best fitting a 2-compartment open model after intravenous administration in humans [14]. Also, this model has been described for the disposition of ceftazidime in cows [17], and cefepime in foals [5], and dogs [15].

At 1 min after injection, the plasma level (57.4 ± 0.72 µg/ml) was approximately 147-fold higher than the minimum therapeutic level of cefpirome (0.39 µg/ml), and the drug was detected above the MIC for up to 14 h. In humans, a high serum level of 44.4 µg/ml was attained at 0.2 h following a 1 g intravenous dose of cefpirome [10]. Similarly, a peak serum level of 47-49 µg/ml was reported in humans receiving 1 g of cefpirome intravenously [16]. A Cmax of 2.13 µg/ml in the pouch exudate of rats was achieved after intravenous administration of cefpirome at a dose rate of 40 µg/kg [1]. The minimum therapeutic plasma concentration of cefpirome against most common pathogens in animals has been reported as 0.05-0.39 µg/ml [1,9]. Due to the influence of certain unavoidable factors in vivo, and to cover most of the susceptible microorganisms, the higher MIC range (0.39 µg/ml) of cefpirome has been taken into consideration for this discussion.

The low distribution half-life (τ1/2α) value of cefpirome (0.08 ± 0.004 h) indicated the drug's rapid distribution from the central to peripheral compartments in buffalo calves. The rapid distribution of cefpirome was further confirmed by the high K12/K21 ratio (1.56 ± 0.05).

The low Vdarea (0.42 ± 0.005 l/kg) in buffalo calves indicated the limited distribution of cefpirome into various body fluids and tissues. Low values of Vdarea have been also reported in mice (0.26 l/kg) and dogs (0.22 l/kg) after single intravenous administration of cefpirome [11]. However, our results are in contrast to the high Vdarea (1.3 ± 0.06 l/kg) value that was reported after the repeated administration of cefotaxime in buffalo calves [19]. Furthermore, the T/P ratio of 1.73 ± 0.06 that we observed when the distribution equilibrium was reached between tissues and plasma reflected higher cefpirome concentrations in the body fluids and tissues as compared to the plasma of the buffalo calves.

The high AUC (73.2 ± 0.90 µg • h/ml) and AUMC (211.2 ± 3.21 µg • h2/ml) values reflected that a vast body area was covered by cefpirome in the buffalo calves. Similarly, high AUC values following single intravenous injection of cefpirome were reported to be 75.6 µg • h/ml in rabbits [9], 20.1 µg • h/ml in mice, 103 µg • h/ml in dogs [11], 18.9 µg • min/ml in rabbits [13], and 16.5 g • min/l in humans [18].

The total body clearance (ClB) of cefpirome, which represents the sum of the metabolic and excretory processes, was 0.14 ± 0.002 l/kg/h in the buffalo calves. Comparable values of ClB were reported for cefpirome in dogs (3.2 ml/kg/min), guineapigs (1.57 ml/kg/min), and humans (1.8 ml/kg/min) following single intravenous injections [11]. Also, similar value of ClB was reported after intravenous injection of ceftriaxone (0.26 l/kg/h) in buffalo calves [4].

The elimination half-life of cefpirome in the buffalo calves was 2.14 ± 0.02 h. Previously reported values of τ1/2β have been 0.47 h in rabbits [9], 0.4 h in rats [8], 0.19 h in mice [11], 0.9 and 1.1 h in dogs [8,11], and 1.95 h in humans [16].

The elimination rate constant of cefpirome from the central compartment (Kel) was 0.89 ± 0.02/h for the buffalo calves. The values of MRT and tCther of cefpirome were 2.89 ± 0.01 h and 6.95 ± 0.06 h, respectively. Others have reported Kel, MRT, and tCther values for ceftriaxone in buffalo calves as 2.28/h, 2.04 h, and 25.1 h, respectively, [4].

The highest urinary excretion amount of the drug was at 0-2 h (356.5 ± 55.3 mg), which gradually declined to 12.4 ± 0.95 mg at 14-24 h. About 58.5% of the administered dose was recovered in the urine within 24 h of administration. In contrast, very high amounts of cefpirome were detected in the urine of dogs (80%) and rats (90%) within 24 h after IV dosing of cefpirome [8, 12]. However, Mrestani et al. [13] reported a very low amount of cefpirome, only 2%, in rabbit urine within 6 h after intraduodenal administration. A similar level of urinary excretion was reported for ceftriaxone in buffalo calves, where 49% of the administered dose was recovered in the urine within 8 h [4].

The main objective of this pharmacokinetic study was to compute the most appropriate dosage regimen of cefpirome for buffalo calves. The most appropriate priming and maintenance doses of cefpirome to maintain a MIC of 0.39 mg/ml at a dosage interval of 12 h would be 8.05 and 7.88 mg/kg, respectively. Under field conditions, a dose of 8.0 mg/kg may be needed at repeated 12 h intervals for 5 days, or until persistence of the bacterial infection occurs.

Acknowledgments

The senior author duly acknowledges the financial assistance received from Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University in the form of a University Merit Scholarship to pursue this study.

Footnotes

Footnote: MIC; minimum inhibitory concentration, AUC; area under the plasma concentration-time-curve, AUMC; area under the first moment of the plasma concentration-time-curve, Cp = plasma drug concentration, Vdarea, VdB, and Vdss; volume of distribution from AUC, elimination phase, and steady state plasma level, respectively.

References

1. Arai S, Kobayashi S, Hayashi S, Sakaguchi T. Distribution of cefpirome (HR 810) to exudate in the croton oil-induced rat granuloma pouch and its therapeutic effects on experimental infections in the pouch. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:1396–1399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Arret B, Johnson DP, Kirshbaum A. Outline of details for microbiological assays of antibiotics: second revision. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60:1689–1694. [PubMed]
3. Bertram MA, Bruckner DA, Young LS. In vitro activity of HR 810, a new cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;26:277–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Dardi MS, Sharma SK, Srivastava AK. Pharmacokinetics and dosage regimen of ceftriaxone in buffalo calves. Vet Res Commun. 2004;28:331–338. [PubMed]
5. Gardner SY, Papich MG. Comparison of cefepime pharmacokinetics in neonatal foals and adult dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2001;24:187–192. [PubMed]
6. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982. pp. 433–444.
7. Hancock RE, Bellido F. Factors involved in the enhanced efficacy against gram-negative bacteria of fourth generation cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29(Suppl A):1–6. [PubMed]
8. Isert D, Klesel N, Limbert M, Markus A, Seibert G, Schrinner E. Pharmacokinetics of cefpirome administered intravenously or intramuscularly to rats and dogs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29(Suppl A):31–37. [PubMed]
9. Jafari HS, Saez-Llorens X, Ramilo O, Shelton SL, McCracken GH., Jr Pharmacokinetics and antibacterial efficacy of cefpirome (HR 810) in experimental Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:220–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Kavi J, Ashby JP, Wise R, Donovan IA. Intraperitoneal penetration of cefpirome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;8:556–558. [PubMed]
11. Kita Y, Yamaaki T, Imada A. Comparative pharmacokinetics of SCE-2787 and related antibiotics in experimental animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2481–2486. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Klesel N, Seeger K. Pharmacokinetic properties of the new cephalosporin antibiotic HR 810 in animals. Infection. 1983;11:318–321. [PubMed]
13. Mrestani Y, Bretschneider B, Hartl A, Neubert RHH. In-vitro and in-vivo studies of cefpirom using bile salts as absorption enhancers. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55:1601–1606. [PubMed]
14. Muller M, Rohde B, Kovar A, Georgopoulos A, Eichler HG, Derendorf H. Relationship between serum and free interstitial concentrations of cefodizime and cefpirome in muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue of healthy volunteers measured by microdialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;37:1108–1113. [PubMed]
15. Nakanomyo H, Esumi Y, Takaichi M, Seki H, Ninomiya S, Okamura Y, Sudo Y. Study on the pharmacokinetics of cefepime (II) Jap J Antibiot. 1992;45:938–942. [PubMed]
16. Paradis D, Vallee F, Allard S, Bisson C, Daviau N, Drapeau C, Auger F, LeBel M. Comparative study of pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities of cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2085–2092. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Rule R, Quiroga GH, Rubio M, Buschiazzo HO, Buschiazzo PM. The pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in lactating and non-lactating cows. Vet Res Commun. 1996;20:543–550. [PubMed]
18. Sauermann R, Delle-Karth G, Marsik C, Steiner I, Zeitlinger M, Mayer-Helm BX, Georgopoulos A, Muller M, Joukhadar C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefpirome in subcutaneous adipose tissue of septic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:650–655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Sharma SK, Srivastava AK. Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in male buffalo calves following multiple dosing. Vet Arh. 2003;73:191–197.
20. Wisemann LR, Lamb HM. Cefpirome. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections and febrile neutropenia. Drugs. 1997;54:117–140. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Veterinary Science