Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of sartSubstance Abuse: Research and Treatment
Subst Abuse. 2010; 4: 9–20.
Published online 2010 April 7.
PMCID: PMC2872246

Metabolic Abnormalities in Abstinent Methamphetamine Dependent Subjects



Chronic methamphetamine use results in persistent neuropsychological deficits in abstinent methamphetamine dependent (AMD) subjects. We examined the hypothesis that elevated concentration of cerebral glutamate (Glu), an excitatory neurotransmitter and neurotoxin, occurs in human AMD.

Materials and Methods:

We examined 40 subjects, 18 of whom were AMD, abstinent more than 3 weeks and 22 were age matched controls. A Structured Clinical Interview was applied to exclude AMD with comorbid depression. We used TE-Averaged technique of MRS to uniquely identify and quantify the glutamate resonance at 2.35 ppm on a 3T clinical MR scanner. Statistics, including Bonferroni correction for multiple MRS variables were applied.


Glu was significantly higher in frontal white matter of AMD (+19%, P = 0.01) and N-acetylaspartate (NAA), an axonal marker, was lower (−14%, P = 0.004). No significant MRS abnormalities were detected in posterior gray matter. Significant correlations were observed between NAA and Glu (P = 0.002 for AMD and P = 0.06 for controls in the posterior gray matter and P = 0.01 for controls and not significant for AMD in the frontal white matter).


Our results demonstrate a significant excess of glutamate in frontal white matter of AMD subjects and offer support for the hypothesis that methamphetamine abuse may exert its long-term neuro-toxicity via glutamate.

Keywords: (3–5) methamphetamine, proton MRS, glutamate, white matter, TE-average


Methamphetamine, an increasingly prevalent drug of abuse in humans, is an excitatory neural stimulant. Direct evidence that glutamate (Glu), the dominant excitatory neurotransmitter in the human brain, plays any role in addiction or contributes to the long-lasting neuropsychological effects of methamphetamine abuse is lacking.14 However, in preclinical studies, the vesicular glutamate transporter has been shown to facilitate accumulation of Glu after exposure to methamphetamine.5 Attempts to explore the impact of methamphetamine abuse on human brain glutamate have been hampered by the absence of a reliable technique for glutamate quantification. Most early studies used proton MRS which at low magnetic fields (typically 1.5 Tesla) relies upon a combined measurement of glutamate and glutamine (termed Glx). These two brain metabolites, although closely linked in the glutamine-glutamate cycle of glutamate neurotransmission, represent separate cell populations and their cerebral concentrations can change independently and in opposite directions.6,7 The detection of uncontaminated Glu has improved with high field 1H MRS811 and the MRS-Glx assay has now been superseded by a specific improvement in proton MRS at higher magnetic fields, such as 3 Tesla, whereby brain glutamate can be clearly separated.8,11

While the acute neuropsychological effects of methamphetamine are global and include psychosis, mania and delirium,12 the long-term deleterious effects of methamphetamine appear to be regionally selective. Neuroimaging studies with positron emission tomography (PET) and functional MRI reveal metabolic and physiological abnormalities in the frontal brain of substance abusers,1316 and it has been suggested that the frontal brain structures are closely involved in craving and continued drug use.17,18

In addition, it has been hypothesized that brain damage resulting from methamphetamine abuse outlives the duration of drug use and can be documented objectively by structural and chemical changes in abstinent methamphetamine dependent subjects.1924 Specifically, enlarged brain volume was observed in recently abstinent (<4 months) methamphetamine users and relatively normal volume with longer than 20 months of abstinence. MRS of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), an axonal marker in white matter and a neuronal marker in gray matter, indicates a significant decrease in NAA levels in abstinent methamphetamine dependent subjects20,2426 whose abstinence periods were between 8 to 20 weeks, consistent with neuronal and/or axonal damage which lasts beyond the immediate period of drug abuse. Furthermore, reduction of Glx (glutamine plus glutamate), in the frontal brain was observed in early abstinent methamphetamine users, followed by relatively normal Glx concentration after 2 months of abstinence.19

If glutamate is an important component of the cycle of methamphetamine abuse, craving, abstinence, and recovery, then significant changes in brain glutamate concentration should be detectable and may persist when drug abuse ends. This study aimed to determine whether brain glutamate is increased in frontal white matter of AMD subjects.

Materials and Methods


The study was approved by the Internal Review Boards of Huntington Memorial Hospital and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California. All subjects gave their written consent before participating in the study. A total of 25 AMD subjects were recruited, 7 subjects were excluded from the study due to depressive symptoms (N = 6) and HIV seropositive (N = 1). Twenty-two age and gender-matched controls with no history of drug abuse were also recruited.

Participants who completed the entire study received modest cash compensation to cover their transportation and other inconveniences. Based on prior studies on the effects of drug abstinence on brain metabolite concentrations, referenced in the Introduction section, AMD subjects were subdivided according to duration of abstinence, defined as ‘short-term’ (3–8 weeks: N = 7) and ‘long-term’ (more than 20 weeks: N = 11). All subjects were recruited by the principle investigator (NS) and were screened for eligibility by a research psychiatrist (OA).

Control subjects

Non-drug users were recruited from the local community by word-of-mouth and excluded if they reported any lifetime alcohol or other substance abuse or met DSM-IV criteria for any other axis I diagnosis, including depression.

Methamphetamine dependence and abstinence

Subjects were recruited from local drug rehabilitation centers and Drug Enforcement Administration Centers in Los Angeles County (“half-way houses”) created for individuals recently released from incarceration for drug-related charges. Other sources of subject recruitment were drug counseling centers, which have random and routine weekly urine screenings. Methamphetamine can be detected in the urine between 2–7 hours after intake and up to 4 days. Accurate determination of abstinence was nevertheless subjective relying on a self-reporting questionnaire and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID).27 Drug-use history was obtained by an additional questionnaire that inquired about the number of years of methamphetamine use, frequency of use, amount used each time, the last time of usage (abstinence period), as well as any other illicit drug use. Consistent with the majority of clinical surveys, a small minority, 4 of 18 AMD subjects, reported occasional use of other recreational drugs cocaine (N = 1), marijuana (N = 2) and alcohol (N = 1). In each case, the second drug use was minor and abstinence period was longer than a one-year. Thus, all abstinent methamphetamine dependent participants in the present study, listed methamphetamine as their primary drug of choice, and none met the DSM-IV criteria for dependence on any other substance within the past year. Current methamphetamine users were intentionally excluded from our cohort to avoid druginduced psychosis, a common feature of active methamphetamine users, which is a possible confound in MRS results. Also excluded were any AMD subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for any major depressive disorder. Co-morbid depression could have introduced a significant confound, since in several prior published studies a variety of MRS abnormalities, including Glx, have been reported.28

Neuropsychological testing was conducted by a trained, supervised research coordinator (MH). Test battery was designed to test the following cognitive domains: pre-morbid intelligence using the National Adult Reading Test (NART); attention and psychomotor speed using Symbol Digit Modalities, the Grooved pegboard, and the Trail Making A tests; cognitive flexibility and response inhibition, using the Trail Making Test B and the Stroop Interference; learning and memory, using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).29

MR spectroscopy

Examinations were performed on a GE 3T whole body MR scanner, as previously described11 using an 8-channel head coil for signal reception and body coil for transmission. High resolution, axial T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo images were acquired and used for image segmentation of voxel composition, and for prescription of single voxel MR spectroscopy. Two 8 cc volumes were placed in the right frontal white matter (FWM) and the posterior gray matter (PGM). For the specific purposes of the present study, brain glutamate and other metabolites were determined by using multiple echo times (TE) single voxel PRESS sequence (TE-Averaged PRESS, GE HealthCare, software version 12.0) with acquisition of 32 echo times in one scan session starting from TE = 35 ms and ending at TE = 190 ms. Spectral bandwidth was set to 5000 Hz (standard for GE 3T) with the number of spectral points at 2048 and the repetition time at 1.5 s. Sixteen scans of unsuppressed water free induction decays (FIDs) were acquired together with the suppressed FIDs (eight averages for each echo time) and used for eddy current correction and internal water scaling. Total acquisition time for MRI and two voxel MRS examinations was 40 minutes per subject. To avoid chemical shift dependent spatial mis-registration for Glu, the transmit frequency was centered close to that of the refocused glutamate C4 proton resonance, at 2.35 ppm. Magnetic field homogeneity within the prescribed voxel was performed using the manufacturer’s AUTOSHIM routine and accepted when line width at half maximum height of unsuppressed water resonance was 6–10 Hz. This was within accepted limits for both voxels in all of the 40 subjects, so that no MRS data was rejected on the grounds of poor shimming. Modern MRI employs parallel imaging technology, which results in added complexity for MRS studies. The present study employed the standard 8-channel head coil. As a result, there were eight separate single-voxel TE-Averaged point-resolved spectroscopy data sets for each brain location. To maximize the MRS signal, these raw data sets were then combined in the time domain30,31 on the basis of coil sensitivity. Coil sensitivity was determined from the unsuppressed water signal intensities of the individual coils and weighted by the sum of the squares of the signal intensity from each coil.

MRS data analysis

After MRI and MRS, raw data was stored for quantitative analysis. The eighty spectra were processed blind to their diagnosis. Twenty-two controls (10 F, 12 M; 31.9 ± 9.7 years) provided a single group. The eighteen AMD subjects (7 F, 11 M; 35.0 ± 9.3 years) were analyzed initially as a single group.

Quantitative MRS assay of glutamate

Metabolite concentrations were quantified using a modification of the standard LCModel32 developed in this Laboratory and also previously described.11 A set of in vitro reference solutions (basis sets) was prepared from which spectra were acquired using the same MRS data acquisition as in vivo. The standard solutions were 50 mM N-acetylaspartate (NAA), 100 mM creatine (Cr), 50 mM choline (Cho), 100 mM glutamate, 100 mM glutamine (Gln), and 150 mM myo-inositol (mI). All standard solutions were adjusted to pH 7.2 with 0.1 M NaOH. To allow for differences in MR-scanner characteristics, which include variations in hardware and software, between the acquisition of the basis sets and the in vivo spectra, the LCModel uses a calibration factor to scale the in vitro basis set to the in vivo spectra. The calibration factor was obtained by using the LCModel to estimate the known concentration of the NAA solution employing the same basis set that was used for in vivo quantification. The same calibration factor was then used for all data sets. Metabolite concentrations were corrected for T2 relaxation using the following correction factor: f = exp (TE avg* (1/T2 met–1/T2 in vitro)), where TE avg is the averaged TE (112.5 ms), T2 met is T2 relaxation of the metabolite, and T2 in vitro is the T2 of the in vitro reference solution. A total of six spectra were excluded from the final analysis due to glutamate signal-to-noise ratio ≤4 (insufficient information), percent standard deviation (%SD) >30%, and technical failures.

MRI segmentation

Because the metabolite concentrations of white and gray matter are known to differ, it was necessary to define possible differences in voxel composition between AMD subjects and controls from which a correction could be applied, based upon the relative contributions of each tissue type to the nominal ‘white’ and ‘gray’ matter. An automated MRI thresh-old segmentation tool BioImage Suite from Oxford Center for Functional MRI of the Brain (FAST33,34) was applied to the images of each subject. The MRI-segmentation method also allowed for the calculation of the contribution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), yielding similar results to that of the T2–7 point technique.35 Brain metabolite concentrations in the voxel were corrected for CSF-partial volume, within which the important metabolite concentrations were deemed to be zero on the basis that cerebral metabolites are below the limits of MRS-detection, using Glucorr = (Glu *100)/(100 — percent CSF).

Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was conducted using Statview software (version 5.0, SAS Institute). For comparison of the mean values of the metabolite concentrations between AMD subjects and controls, the Student’s t-test was used. The Bonferroni correction was then applied to the MRS data to correct for possible Type 1 error where metabolite measurements are potentially interdependent. Nonparametric correlations techniques were used to examine the relationship between metabolite concentrations for each of the voxel locations and years of methamphetamine use, total methamphetamine use and duration of abstinence. In addition, correlations between neurochemical abnormalities and abnormalities in individual neuropsychological tests were performed. In all analyses, the level of significance was set at P < 0.05.


Demographic characteristics of study participants are given in Table 1. There were no significant differences is age (mean = 35 years old, 95% Confidence interval = 30.7–39.4 for AMD subjects and mean = 31.9 years old, 95% Confidence interval = 27.9–35.9 for controls) and sex composition (P = 0.47) between AMD subjects and healthy controls.

Table 1
Demographics of participants in MRS study.

Figure 1 illustrates the locations of the FWM and the PGM voxels examined in this study. Representative TE-Averaged MRS brain spectra from a control and an AMD subject are shown in Figure 2. The resulting spectra differ in overall appearance from the conventional single echo time acquisitions at short (TE 35 ms) echo times. In the TE-Averaged data acquisition of the present study, myo-inositol was the only resonance of importance which was not captured, while the glutamate resonance at 2.35 ppm appears as a well-resolved single peak in all four spectra. Glutamate appears more prominent in the representative spectrum from the FWM of an AMD subject (Fig. 2D) than in the FWM of a representative control subject (Fig. 2C).

Figure 1
Axial images showing locations of the MRS voxels. 2 × 2 × 2cm3 voxels were reproducibly prescribed using MRI landmarks in axial slices. Posterior gray matter (left) and frontal white matter (right). Segmentation indicates the fractional ...
Figure 2
Representative TE-Averaged MRS spectra from an abstinent methamphetamine dependent (AMD) subject and a control. MRS was performed in localized brain regions indicated on axial MRI as frontal white matter and posterior gray matter. The expected differences ...

Differences between AMD and control subjects, which were not readily discerned in individual spectra, became apparent and statistically significant after quantitative MRS analysis (Table 2). Glutamate was significantly increased by 19% in the FWM of the AMD group compared to controls (6.8 mM vs. 5.7 mM, P = 0.01). NAA was significantly reduced (8.0 mM vs. 9.3 mM, P = 0.004). No significant differences between AMD and control subjects were found in the PGM. There were no significant differences between controls and AMD subjects for Cho and Cr in the FWM or the PGM.

Table 2
Cerebral metabolite concentrations in the frontal white matter and the posterior gray matter of abstinent methamphetamine dependent subjects and controls.

Clinical characteristics and metabolite concentrations

The effects on brain glutamate found for the AMD group as a whole was observed. However, when the group was subdivided on the basis of duration of abstinence, only short-term abstinence reach statistical significance after the Bonferroni correction was applied (Table 2). During short-term abstinence 3–8 weeks; (8.2 vs. 9.3; P = 0.03), the 12% reduction of NAA of the FWM was significant, but the 16% reduction was persistently observed after >20 weeks long-term abstinence (P = 0.01) suggesting, as others have observed, a long-term axonal (or neuronal) deficit in AMD subjects. The impression that both neurochemical changes persist and are directly related to the duration of abstinence is supported by a plot of metabolite concentration versus weeks of abstinence for AMD subjects (Fig. 3) which shows a significant correlation for Glu (Spearman correlation, r = −0.49, P = 0.05) and a trend for NAA (r = −0.31, P = 0.21). No correlation was observed for years of usage. In addition no significant correlations were observed between the posterior gray matter with either years of usage or abstinent period.

Figure 3
Correlations between MRS determined cerebral metabolites and duration of abstinence in weeks. Glutamate in the frontal white matter (Fig. 3, top) which is elevated in AMD subjects decreased significantly and was weakly correlated (P = 0.05) with duration ...

Relationship between NAA and Glu

Since both of the metabolites impacted in the FWM are believed to be at their highest concentrations in neuronal and axonal tissue, rather than glia, a possible relationship exists between NAA and Glu. In the FWM (Fig. 4) of AMD subjects and of controls, plots of Glu vs. NAA were parallel but different. When plotted on the same axes, NAA was markedly reduced in AMD subjects compared to controls (Pearson correlation, r = 0.15, P = 0.57 in AMD and r = 0.59, P = 0.01 in controls). There were no significant correlations in the PGM of AMD subjects and controls. Interestingly, when all subjects were combined a significant correlation between the two metabolite concentrations (rho = 0.78, P = 0.001) was found as expected, since both glutamate and NAA are predominantly concentrated in neurons (and axons).

Figure 4
Correlation between concentrations of glutamate and NAA in the frontal white matter (top) and posterior gray matter (bottom) of AMD subjects and controls. In the frontal white matter, there are no correlations between NAA and Glu in AMD subjects (P = ...

Correlations between neuropsychological tests and cerebral glutamate concentration

As previously reported by others,36 there is a significantly positive correlation between the FWM NAA and memory tasks of RAVLT [the delayed recall: rho = 0.6, P = 0.03, N = 12, and long-term retention: rho = 0.7, P = 0.003, N = 12]. However, there are no significant correlations between neuropsychological test results and glutamate concentration in the FWM or the PGM in AMD subjects.

Gray-white matter composition within voxels of interest

The size and locations of the two voxels studied are shown in Figure 1. FWM and PGM voxels differed significantly in their relative composition with greater contribution from CSF in GM (14% ± 2%, comparable to a previous report by Zhang and colleagues33 accounted for by the mid-line prescription of the posterior cingulated gyrus which includes the cerebral falx). The CSF contribution to the selected FWM voxel was much lower (5% ± 1%). Corrections were applied to the MRS findings as described in the methods section assigning zero concentrations for both NAA and Glu to CSF.

MRI segmentation showed the altered proportions of white and gray matter in each of the prescribed brain location: the FWM comprised = 77% WM and 18% GM, <5% CSF and the PGM comprised = 68% GM and 20% WM, 12% CSF. When groups were compared, there was no increase in WM contribution to the FWM or PGM voxels of AMD subjects, compared to controls. Therefore no corrections were applied to the metabolite concentrations.

Correction for transverse relaxation time (T2)

T2 relaxation times determined from eighteen AMD and eight control subjects were comparable. Averaged transverse relaxation times in the FWM (T2 in ms, standard deviation in parentheses) were NAA = 214 ms,41 Cr = 143 ms,28 Cho = 196 ms;61 and for the PGM: 181 ms,8 133,10 173 ms.21 In vitro T2 relaxation times for NAA = 472 ms, Cr = 302 ms and Cho = 212 ms. These values were used to correct for T2 relaxations for these three metabolites. However, due to strong J coupling of Glu resonances, it was not possible to determine T2 of Glu directly using a single exponential decay fit. A two-dimensional fitting procedure has been reported for calculating T2 from the multiple echo times data set.37 Glu concentration was corrected for in vivo T2 using previously reported values38 and assuming identical T2 in AMD subjects and controls.


To examine the hypothesis that excess glutamate may contribute to dysfunction in methamphetamine dependent subjects and that the effect of methamphetamine dependence may persist during abstinence, glutamate concentration was determined in the FWM of AMD subjects. We measured N-acetyl aspartate, a well recognized MRS-marker of neurons and axons in white matter as a surrogate for neuronal/axonal injury. A novel feature of this study was the use of an MRS technique which has been optimized for single-line detection of glutamate resonance at 2.35 ppm to quantify cerebral glutamate concentration in the same brain locations. To avoid the psychosis, mania, and other psychiatric confounds associated with active methamphetamine use, we chose to examine methamphetamine dependent subjects during a carefully documented period of abstinence and to compare them to age-matched healthy, non-drug users as controls. The choice of brain locations was dictated by the use of the ‘posterior’ brain as a control for the expected principal target of neuropsychological and neurochemical deficits in AMD subjects, the frontal brain.

The main findings of this study were a statistically significant elevation (+19%) of Glu in the FWM of AMD subjects and a statistically significant reduction (−14%) in NAA, confirming an observation by others of long-term neuronal/axonal injury in AMD subjects. The abnormalities in both metabolites appear to be confined to the FWM. No statistically significant differences exist in concentrations of either metabolite in the PGM. Although statistically weaker, abnormal metabolites in AMD subjects appear to persist in proportion to the duration of abstinence. A rich clinical literature reports various neurocognitive impairments associated with short and long-term exposure to methamphetamine, including deficits in decision-making, 39,40 learning difficulties, problem-solving, and difficulty in maintaining attention.36,41,42 It is also suggested that these impairments are largely the result of frontal and subcortical damage. A significant correlation between low NAA concentration in the FWM and memory tasks was observed in the AMD subjects. Although neuropsychological deficits have been reported in methamphetamine users,36,43 limited studies correlate such deficits with metabolite concentrations. Salo and colleagues44 found a significant correlation between low NAA/Cr ratio and attention control. Taylor and his colleagues45 also observed a poorer neurocognitive performance in stimulant dependent subjects with lower NAA levels. These observations reflect the impact of methamphetamine on cognition. No correlation of neuropsychological test results with elevated brain glutamate was found in the present study.

Previous studies reported abnormal Cho level in abstinent methamphetamine dependent subjects. Sekine and colleagues26 found evidence of abnormally high Cho/Cr ratio in the basal ganglia of 13 AMD subjects compared with 11 controls. Nordahl and colleagues43 also found evidence of elevated Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios in the anterior cingulate cortex in 16 AMD subjects. The lack of congruity between the studies was probably reflecting a different voxel of interest location.

This is the first report of increased glutamate concentration in the FWM of human brain associated with dependence on an excitatory drug, methamphetamine, although animal studies have predicted such a finding. 46,47 NAA is often reported as a neuronal marker; therefore reduction of NAA indicates reduced neuronal integrity, the result of either neuronal cell death or functional impairment. Such a view is based on previous immunohistochemical studies on the whole brain using NAA-specific antibodies.48 NAA is also a major metabolite in axons, where it is concentrated, after being synthesized in and transported from the neuron. We observed significant positive correlations between NAA and Glu in AMD subjects and controls suggest that the majority of Glu, measured by proton MRS, is of neuronal and axonal origin. However, the significant correlation was lost in the FWM of AMD subjects, in which we observed reduced NAA and increased Glu compared to normal subjects. It is not known with certainty within which structures of white matter the impact of brain injury on the distribution of glutamate may be. Because of the cross-sectional design of the present study, we cannot address the issue of causality. Longitudinal studies, covering the period of methamphetamine abuse and abstinence, are urgently required to answer the tempting speculation as to whether in AMD subjects the persistent elevation of glutamate in white matter may be the cause of neuronal and axonal injury, noted here as a reduction in the MRS marker NAA. However, it is possible that our observation reflects abnormalities in non-neuronal cells, microglia and macroglia (astrocytes), within the FWM brain region. White matter abnormalities have been well documented in AMD subjects.15,21,4952 In a study by Sung and colleagues, elevated myo-inositol, a marker of glial cells, was observed in AMD subjects, from which glial cell proliferation in response to the neuronal toxicity from methamphetamine was concluded. In our recent study,52 using a novel 13 C MRS method, we reported direct evidence of abnormalities in glial oxidative mechanism in frontal brain of AMD subjects.

Another explanation for the present findings concerns the current view of white matter function that axons communicate with the neurons of gray matter via chemical messengers, has recently been amplified by the discovery of transmitter function of oligodendrocytes, the glial cells which are responsible for myelin formation.53 One of these messengers is Glu. Glu is released in an activity-dependent manner from white matter; glial cells within fiber tracts express Glu receptors and Glu transporters which are present to remove Glu, preventing Glu excitotoxicity. 54,55 Therefore, a possible explanation for elevated Glu in the white matter could be a result of impairment of Glu receptors or Glu transporters in white matter. Recently, a dysfunction of Glu transporters was reported in preclinical studies after exposure to methamphetamine.54 Based upon our present findings, when the putative neurotoxin, glutamate, returns to normal further neurological damage will be limited. As part of the process of glutamatergic neurotransmission, Glu releases from the neuron and is taken up by astrocytes, where it is converted to glutamine (Gln) by a glutamine synthetase enzyme, glutamine is then transported back to the presynaptic neuron, and reconverted to Glu.56 Elevation of the Glu level indicates less conversion of Glu to Gln, and therefore suggests less glutamatergic activity. Increased Glu has been demonstrated in preclinical studies in repeated injections of methamphetamine in rodent striatum.46,57 In a recent study, McFarland et al47 demonstrated that increased Glu release in the pre-frontal cortex and accumbens is required for the reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Our observations provide preliminary evidence in humans, which supports regional cerebral impairment in glutamate metabolism or in glutamatergic neurotransmission, as a contributor to the persistent neurochemical abnormalities and cognitive deficits, which result from long-term methamphetamine dependence.

Limitation in MRS study

Our study has a number of limitations. Glu concentrations reported in this study are approximate concentrations due to: first, we did not measure T1 of Glu using the TE-Averaged method, we had to compromise between measurement time and signal-to-noise for glutamate detection. Using TR = 6 s (for expected T1 of 1.2 s) and longer for T1 measurement would not have been feasible because scan time would have been too long. In addition, our simplifications approach to perform T2 correction. Second, possible confounding factors in our results are the characteristics of AMD subjects which include an average of 10 years of drug use, a wide range in the estimated amount of drug use of 4448 ± 5120 g and abstinence ranging from 3 weeks–122 weeks. In addition, AMD subjects had an average of 3 years of education less than the controls. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). We noted this difference and discussed its possible impact on our MRS neurochemical results, since it has been shown that subjects’ educational levels contributed to a small and significant increase in NAA concentration of white matter.58 No equivalent data relating brain glutamate with education level is available. We conclude that this difference in education levels between the AMD subjects and controls is unlikely to be the explanation for the substantial and statistically significant elevation in Glu of the FWM, which appears to recover towards normal over the duration of abstinence.


The present results define increased concentrations of glutamate, a known neurotoxin and may, therefore, offer a novel mechanism for neurological injury in methamphetamine abuse. This study lends support to the growing body of data available from studies in animals, implicating glutamate in a methamphetamine-dependent neurological and neuropsychiatric disorder.


This work was performed during tenure of NIDA K25 DA021112 award to NS. The authors thank Ms. Colleen Oinuma for assistance in preparation of this manuscript and the Rudi Schulte Research Institute for additional funding. We also thank Ms. Thao Tran and Dr. Kent Harris for their assistance in statistical analysis.



This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. This paper is unique and is not under consideration by any other publication and has not been published elsewhere. The authors and peer reviewers of this paper report no conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that they have permission to reproduce any copyrighted material.


1. Boireau A, Bordier F, Dubedat P, Doble A. Methamphetamine and dopamine neurotoxicity: differential effects of agents interfering with glutamatergic transmission. Neurosci Lett. 1995;195:9–12. [PubMed]
2. Ohmori T, Abekawa T, Koyama T. The role of glutamate in the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;801:315–26. [PubMed]
3. Davidson C, Gow AJ, Lee TH, Ellinwood EH. Methamphetamine neurotoxicity: necrotic and apoptotic mechanisms and relevance to human abuse and treatment. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;36:1–22. [PubMed]
4. Miyatake M, Narita M, Shibasaki M, Nakamura A, Suzuki T. Glutamatergic neurotransmission and protein kinase C play a role in neuron-glia communication during the development of methamphetamine-induced psychological dependence. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1476–88. [PubMed]
5. Mark KA, Quinton MS, Russek SJ, Yamamoto BK. Dynamic changes in vesicular glutamate transporter 1 function and expression related to methamphetamine-induced glutamate release. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6823–31. [PubMed]
6. Kreis R, Farrow N, Ross BD. Diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lancet. 1990;336:635–6. [PubMed]
7. Bluml S, Moreno-Torres A, Ross BD. [1–13C]glucose MRS in chronic hepatic encephalopathy in man. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:981–93. [PubMed]
8. Hurd R, Sailasuta N, Srinivasan R, et al. Measurement of brain glutamate using TE-averaged PRESS at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:435–40. [PubMed]
9. Kickler N, Krack P, Fraix V, et al. Glutamate measurement in Parkinson’s disease using MRS at 3 T field strength. NMR Biomed. 2007;20:757–62. [PubMed]
10. Griffith HR, Okonkwo OC, O’Brien T, Hollander JA. Reduced brain glutamate in patients with Parkinson’s disease. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:381–7. [PubMed]
11. Sailasuta N, Shriner K, Ross B. Evidence of reduced glutamate in the frontal lobe of HIV-seropositive patients. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:326–31. [PubMed]
12. Albertson TE, Derlet RW, Van Hoozen BE. Methamphetamine and the expanding complications of amphetamines. West J Med. 1999;170:214–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. London ED, Stapleton JM, Phillips RL, et al. PET studies of cerebral glucose metabolism: acute effects of cocaine and long-term deficits in brains of drug abusers. NIDA Res Monogr. 1996;163:146–58. [PubMed]
14. London ED, Ernst M, Grant S, Bonson K, Weinstein A. Orbitofrontal cortex and human drug abuse: functional imaging. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:334–42. [PubMed]
15. Kim SJ, Lyoo IK, Hwang J, et al. Frontal glucose hypometabolism in abstinent methamphetamine users. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1383–91. [PubMed]
16. Fishbein DH, Eldreth DL, Hyde C, et al. Risky decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23:119–36. [PubMed]
17. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1642–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Lubman DI, Yucel M, Pantelis C. Addiction, a condition of compulsive behaviour? Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence of inhibitory dysregulation. Addiction. 2004;99:1491–502. [PubMed]
19. Ernst T, Chang L. Adaptation of brain glutamate plus glutamine during abstinence from chronic methamphetamine use. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2008;3:165–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ernst T, Chang L, Leonido-Yee M, Speck O. Evidence for long-term neurotoxicity associated with methamphetamine abuse: A 1H MRS study. Neurology. 2000;54:1344–9. [PubMed]
21. Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, Simon SL, et al. Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6028–36. [PubMed]
22. Jernigan TL, Gamst AC, Archibald SL, et al. Effects of methamphetamine dependence and HIV infection on cerebral morphology. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1461–72. [PubMed]
23. Volkow ND, Chang L, Wang GJ, et al. Loss of dopamine transporters in methamphetamine abusers recovers with protracted abstinence. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9414–8. [PubMed]
24. Nordahl TE, Salo R, Possin K, et al. Low N-acetyl-aspartate and high choline in the anterior cingulum of recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects: a preliminary proton MRS study. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Psychiatry Res. 2002;116:43–52. [PubMed]
25. Chung A, Lyoo IK, Kim SJ, et al. Decreased frontal white-matter integrity in abstinent methamphetamine abusers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007;10:765–75. [PubMed]
26. Sekine Y, Minabe Y, Kawai M, et al. Metabolite alterations in basal ganglia associated with methamphetamine-related psychiatric symptoms. A proton MRS study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:453–61. [PubMed]
27. A compendium of Neuropsychological Test 2006: Administration, Norm, and Commentary. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;
28. Yildiz-Yesiloglu A, Ankerst DP. Review of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2006;147:1–25. [PubMed]
29. DSM-I.V.-T.R. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edn Text version. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
30. Brown MA. Time-domain combination of MR spectroscopy data acquired using phased-array coils. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:1207–13. [PubMed]
31. Wright SM, Wald LL. Theory and application of array coils in MR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1997;10:394–410. [PubMed]
32. Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:672–9. [PubMed]
33. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:45–57. [PubMed]
34. Duncan JS, Papademetris X, Yang J, et al. Geometric strategies for neuroanatomic analysis from MRI. Neuroimage. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S34–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Kreis R, Ernst T, Ross BD. Development of the human brain: in vivo quantification of metabolite and water content with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:424–37. [PubMed]
36. Salo R, Nordahl TE, Possin K, et al. Preliminary evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Psychiatry Res. 2002;111:65–74. [PubMed]
37. Schulte RF, Boesiger P. ProFit: two-dimensional prior-knowledge fitting of J-resolved spectra. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:255–63. [PubMed]
38. Choi C, Coupland NJ, Bhardwaj PP, et al. T2 measurement and quantification of glutamate in human brain in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:971–7. [PubMed]
39. Rogers RD, Everitt BJ, Baldacchino A, et al. Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;20:322–39. [PubMed]
40. Kalechstein AD, Newton TF, Green M. Methamphetamine dependence is associated with neurocognitive impairment in the initial phases of abstinence. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;15:215–20. [PubMed]
41. Nordahl TE, Salo R, Leamon M. Neuropsychological effects of chronic methamphetamine use on neurotransmitters and cognition: a review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;15:317–25. [PubMed]
42. Simon SL, Domier C, Carnell J, et al. Cognitive impairment in individuals currently using methamphetamine. Am J Addict. 2000;9:222–31. [PubMed]
43. Nordahl TE, Salo R, Natsuaki Y, et al. Methamphetamine users in sustained abstinence: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:444–52. [PubMed]
44. Salo R, Nordahl TE, Natsuaki Y, et al. Attentional control and brain metabolite levels in methamphetamine abusers. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61:1272–80. [PubMed]
45. Taylor MJ, Alhassoon OM, Schweinsburg BC, Videen JS, Grant I. MR spectroscopy in HIV and stimulant dependence HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:83–5. [PubMed]
46. Nash JF, Yamamoto BK. Methamphetamine neurotoxicity and striatal glutamate release: comparison to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Brain Res. 1992;581:237–43. [PubMed]
47. McFarland K, Lapish CC, Kalivas PW. Prefrontal glutamate release into the core of the nucleus accumbens mediates cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3531–7. [PubMed]
48. Moffett JR, Namboodiri MA, Cangro CB, Neale JH. Immunohistochemical localization of N-acetylaspartate in rat brain. Neuroreport. 1991;2:131–4. [PubMed]
49. Berman S, O’Neill J, Fears S, Bartzokis G, London ED. Abuse of amphetamines and structural abnormalities in the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1141:195–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Oh JS, Lyoo IK, Sung YH, et al. Shape changes of the corpus callosum in abstinent methamphetamine users. Neurosci Lett. 2005;384:76–81. [PubMed]
51. Sung YH, Cho SC, Hwang J, et al. Relationship between N-acetyl-aspartate in gray and white matter of abstinent methamphetamine abusers and their history of drug abuse: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88:28–35. [PubMed]
52. Sailasuta N, Abulseoud O, Harris KC, Ross BD. Glial dysfunction in abstinent methamphetamine abusers. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.261.. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Ziskin JL, Nishiyama A, Rubio M, Fukaya M, Bergles DE. Vesicular release of glutamate from unmyelinated axons in white matter. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:321–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Hassel B, Boldingh KA, Narvesen C, Iversen EG, Skrede KK. Glutamate transport, glutamine synthetase and phosphate-activated glutaminase in rat CNS white matter. A quantitative study. J Neurochem. 2003;87:230–7. [PubMed]
55. Karadottir R, Cavelier P, Bergersen LH, Attwell D. NMDA receptors are expressed in oligodendrocytes and activated in ischaemia. Nature. 2005;438:1162–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Danbolt NC. Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;65:1–105. [PubMed]
57. Abekawa T, Ohmori T, Koyama T. Effects of repeated administration of a high dose of methamphetamine on dopamine and glutamate release in rat striatum and nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 1994;643:276–81. [PubMed]
58. Jung RE, Haier RJ, Yeo RA, et al. Sex differences in N-acetylaspartate correlates of general intelligence: an 1H-MRS study of normal human brain. Neuroimage. 2005;26:965–72. [PubMed]

Articles from Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications