Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(5): e10645.
Published online 2010 May 14. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0010645
PMCID: PMC2871037

A Single Immunization with Soluble Recombinant Trimeric Hemagglutinin Protects Chickens against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus H5N1

Ralph Tripp, Editor



The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus H5N1 causes multi-organ disease and death in poultry, resulting in significant economic losses in the poultry industry. In addition, it poses a major public health threat as it can be transmitted directly from infected poultry to humans with very high (60%) mortality rate. Effective vaccination against HPAI H5N1 would protect commercial poultry and would thus provide an important control measure by reducing the likelihood of bird-to-bird and bird-to-human transmission.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the present study we evaluated the vaccine potential of recombinant soluble trimeric subtype 5 hemagglutinin (sH53) produced in mammalian cells. The secreted, purified sH53 was biologically active as demonstrated by its binding to ligands in a sialic acid-dependent manner. It was shown to protect chickens, in a dose-dependent manner, against a lethal challenge with H5N1 after a single vaccination. Protected animals did not shed challenge virus as determined by a quantitative RT-PCR on RNA isolated from trachea and cloaca swabs. Also in mice, vaccination with sH53 provided complete protection against challenge with HPAI H5N1.


Our results demonstrate that sH53 constitutes an attractive vaccine antigen for protection of chickens and mammals against HPAI H5N1. As these recombinant soluble hemagglutinin preparations can be produced with high yields and with relatively short lead time, they enable a rapid response to circulating and potentially pandemic influenza viruses.


Influenza A viruses are enveloped, negative-strand RNA viruses with a segmented genome. They infect a large variety of animal species, although birds are considered to constitute the reservoir from which all influenza A viruses in other species originate [1], [2]. On the basis of the antigenic properties of their two surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), influenza A viruses are classified into 16 HA (H1–16) and 9 NA (N1–9) subtypes. The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus H5N1 causes multi-organ disease and death in poultry, resulting in significant economic losses in the poultry industry. HPAI H5N1 also poses a major public health threat as it can be transmitted directly from infected poultry to humans with very high (60%) mortality rate. It is widely accepted that continued human exposure to influenza viruses circulating in wild and domestic avian species poses a permanent pandemic threat [3], [4]. Effective vaccination against HPAI H5N1 would protect commercial poultry and would thus provide an important control measure by reducing the likelihood of bird-to-bird as well as bird-to-human transmission. Therefore, the development of efficacious influenza vaccines is of high veterinary and public health importance.

Conventional vaccine preparations against HPAI H5N1 are produced by propagating virus in embryonated chicken eggs or mammalian cells. The vaccine viruses used are either reassortants or low pathogenic wild-type avian viruses. Either way, the viruses need to be selected for their ability to multiply in eggs or cultured cells, which may preclude the best genetic match to the circulating HPAI H5N1 strains. In addition, these vaccines have several other limitations as reviewed elsewhere [5], [6]. Hence, other vaccine strategies against HPAI H5N1 have been explored including the use of, among others, live attenuated influenza vaccines [7], [8], live vaccines based on heterologous viral vectors such as pox virus [9], adenovirus [10], baculovirus [11] and Newcastle disease virus [12], and DNA vaccination [13]. While these different strategies often showed promising results, their applicability ultimately will depend on various important issues including safety, efficacy, production and costs [5].

Protective immunity against influenza virus infection and disease is primarily conferred through HA via the induction of anti-HA antibodies. As protection from influenza virus infection correlates with anti-HA titers, nearly all vaccine approaches aim to induce high levels thereof. Therefore, the HA protein is the antigen of choice for the development of recombinant subunit vaccines to protect against HPAI H5N1. An influenza vaccine based on recombinant purified HA could offer the following advantages: I) The HA antigen can be produced using safe, quality-controlled and scalable conditions. II) There will be no need for virus cultivation, thus avoiding the necessity a) to obtain viruses that replicate efficiently in eggs or cell culture, b) to use biocontainment facilities and c) to inactivate the virus using procedures that may affect antigenicity and raise safety concerns. III) The recombinant HA protein can be highly purified thereby limiting adverse reactions caused e.g. by the presence of egg contaminants. IV) Immunization with recombinant HA will allow the serological differentiation of naturally infected from vaccinated animals/flocks (the so-called DIVA principle; [14]). IV) Recombinant HA vaccines are manufactured with a relatively short lead time, allowing an accelerated response to emerging influenza strains.

Recombinant HA can be produced using different expression systems. When expressed in E. coli the resulting HA protein gave rise to the induction of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers upon immunization of mice [15]. However, as proper folding and trimerization of the HA protein requires multiple posttranslational modifications including glycosylation and disulfide bond formation, expression of the HA protein in higher eukaryotic systems is likely to result in superior antigenicity. Thus, mammalian cell-derived HA trimers were found to induce much higher levels of neutralizing antibodies than similarly produced monomeric HA protein [16]. The baculovirus expression system has been used to produce strain specific HA antigens in insect cells, which were shown to protect against a HPAI H5N1 challenge [17]. Such full-size HA proteins may, however, be limited in their efficacy because the membrane proteins may not retain their native membrane-bound structure upon purification [18]. Hence, the production of recombinant, soluble, stable HA trimers that are secreted from the cells seems like an attractive alternative approach. Such HA trimers, expressed either in insect or mammalian cells, were indeed shown to elicit neutralizing antibodies [16] and to partially protect mice against HPAI H5N1 challenge infection [19].

In view of their promising potential we have evaluated recombinant soluble HA trimers in chickens and mice for their ability to induce protective immunity against infection with HPAI H5N1. To this end, recombinant soluble H5 proteins provided with a GCN4 trimerization motif and a STREP-tag II, the latter for purification purposes, were expressed in mammalian cells. The recombinant soluble H5 trimers (sH53) were purified from the culture supernatants using a simple one-step purification protocol and characterized with respect to their oligomeric state and bioactivity. Subsequently, vaccination with the sH53 preparation was shown to provide complete protection against challenge with HPAI H5N1 both in mice and in chickens, in the latter already after a single immunization.

Materials and Methods

Genes and expression vectors

A cDNA clone corresponding to residues 18 to 523 (H3 numbering) of the HA from A/Viet Nam/1203/2004 (H5N1) (Genbank accession no. ABW90137.1) was synthesized using human-preferred codons by GenScript USA Inc. In this clone the predicted HA ectodomain protein lacks a multibasic cleavage site. The cDNA was cloned into the pCD5 expression vector for efficient expression in mammalian cells [20]. The pCD5 vector had been modified such that the HA-encoding cDNA was cloned in frame with DNA sequences coding for a signal sequence, an artificial GCN4 isoleucine zipper trimerization motif (KRMKQIEDKIEEIESKQKKIENEIARIKK) [21] and the Strep-tag II (WSHPQFEK; IBA, Germany). The resulting vector encodes the soluble trimeric H5 protein designated as sH53.

Protein expression and purification

pCD5 expression vectors containing the HA ectodomain-encoding sequences were transfected into HEK293S GnTI(−)cells [22] using polyethyleneimine I (PEI) in a 1[ratio]5 ratio (µg DNA[ratio] µg PEI). At 6 h post transfection, the transfection mixture was replaced by 293 SFM II expression medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with sodium bicarbonate (3.7 g/liter), glucose (2.0 g/liter), Primatone RL-UF (3.0 g/liter), penicillin (100 units/ml), Streptomycin (100 µg/ml), glutaMAX (Gibco), and 1,5% dimethyl sulfoxide. Tissue culture supernatants were harvested 5–6 days post transfection. HA protein expression and secretion was confirmed by sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) followed by western blotting using a mouse anti-Strep-tag antibody (IBA, Germany). HA proteins were purified using Strep-tactin Sepharose beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (IBA, Germany). The concentration of purified protein was determined by using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Isogen Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Biological characterization of recombinant HA

The oligomerization status of the sH53 proteins was determined by analyzing the elution profile using a Superdex200GL 10–300 column (GE Healthcare). Sialic acid-binding activity of sH53 was assessed using a fetuin solid phase assay. 1 µg/ml fetuin per well was used to coat 96-well Nunc MaxiSorp plates. When indicated in the figure legend, fetuin was treated with Vibrio Cholera derived neuraminidase (VCNA; Roche) followed by three washing steps. sH53 was pre-complexed with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked anti-Strep-tag antibody (2[ratio]1 molar ratio) for 30 min at 0°C prior to incubation of limiting dilutions on the fetuin-coated plates (60 min, room temperature [RT]). HA-binding was subsequently detected using tetramethylbenzidine substrate (BioFX) in an ELISA reader (EL-808 [BioTEK]), reading the OD at 450 nm.

Vaccination-challenge experiments in chickens

Animal studies were conducted at the Central Veterinary Institute (CVI), Lelystad, under BSL3 conditions and after approval by the Animal Ethic Committee. In the first chicken experiment, 6 weeks old SPF white Leghorn chickens (Lohmann, Cuxhaven, Germany) were used (10 chickens per group). One group of animals was immunized twice (on day 0 and 21) by intramuscular (i.m.) injection (0.5 ml) of 10 µg sH53 adjuvanted with Stimune as recommended by the manufacturer [Prionics, Lelystad]). As a challenge control, the other group received an equal volume of PBS in Stimune (mock vaccinated). Three weeks after the vaccination (day 42), the birds were challenged by inoculation with 105 median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of A/Viet Nam/1194/04 virus (0.1 ml intranasally [i.n.] and 0.1 ml intratracheally [i.t.]) and monitored over a period of 14 days for signs of disease. Blood samples were collected at 3 weeks after each immunization (on day 21 and 42 post infection [p.i.]).

For the next experiment, 70 one-day-old layer hens (white Leghorn) were purchased from a local breeder. The chickens had been vaccinated against Newcastle disease virus and infectious bronchitis virus at the age of one day according to the farm's routine and were raised in CVI's animal facility. At the age of 6 weeks, the birds were transported to the BSL-3 facility and allocated to 7 experimental groups of 10 birds each. The animals of six groups were immunized once (on day 21) or twice (on day 0 and 21) by i.m. injection of 10, 2 or 0.4 µg sH53 antigen adjuvanted with Stimune. When immunized twice, the same doses were given on day 0 and 21. As a challenge control, one group was mock-vaccinated twice (on day 0 and 21) with PBS in Stimune. Four weeks after vaccination (day 49), blood samples were taken and the chickens were challenged as above and observed daily for clinical signs during 14 days. Trachea and cloaca swabs were taken from each chicken on day 2, 4 and 7 p.i.

Vaccination-challenge experiment in mice

Female, specified pathogen-free (SPF) 9-week-old BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories; 10 animals per group) were immunized once (on day 21) or twice (on day 0 and 21) by i.m. injection (0.2 ml) of 2 µg sH53 adjuvanted with Stimune. As a challenge control, one group of mice was mock vaccinated. Three weeks after the vaccination, mice were anaesthetized with ketamin/xylazin by intraperitoneal injection and inoculated intranasally with 50 µl of H5N1A/Viet nam/1194/04 containing ~10 median lethal dose (LD50; 3.7 10log TCID50; provided by Dr. Alan Hay from the WHO Influenza Centre at the National Institute for Medical Research, London). The mice were weighed daily and examined for signs of illness during the next 14 days. Clinical signs were recorded using a scoring system (0 = no clinical signs; 1 = rough coat; 2 = rough coat, less reactive, passive during handling; 3 = rough coat, rolled up, laboured breathing, passive during handling; 4 = rough coat, rolled up, laboured breathing, unresponsive). Animals reaching a score of 4 were euthanized. Surviving animals were bled and sacrificed on day 14 p.i.

Virus detection assay

Trachea and cloaca swabs were stored in cold tryptose phosphate broth supplemented with antibiotics. The medium was clarified by low-speed centrifugation and the supernatant was harvested, aliquoted and stored at −70°C. Upon thawing, trachea and cloaca swabs sampled from the same bird on the same day were pooled and the viral RNA was extracted from 200 µl using a MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Roche). Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized using reverse primer 5′-CACTGGGCACGGTGAGC-3′ and part of the M1 gene was amplified by running 45 cycles of Light Cycler PCR using primer 5′-CTTCTAACCGAGGTCGAAACGTA-3′ as the reverse primer in the presence of the TaqMan fluorescent probe 5′-6FAM-TCAGGCCCCCTCAAAGCCGA-X-ph. Negative and positive control samples were tested in parallel. The lower limit of detection was determined to be approximately 500 TCID50. Some samples gave inconclusive results, meaning that they gave only a very weak signal (fluorescence<0.07) after >31 cycles.

Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay

Heat-inactivated immune sera from chicken blood samples were tested for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) activity with 1% chicken red blood cells and 4 hemagglutinating units (HAU) of H5N1 (A/Viet Nam/1194/04 NIBRG-14). In addition, the chicken sera were tested for HI activity using 8 HAU (67 ng) of recombinant soluble trimeric HA protein. To this end the recombinant proteins were precomplexed with the anti-Strep-tag antibody as described above, mixed with limiting dilutions of the chicken sera and incubated with 0.5% chicken red blood cells. Red button formation was scored as evidence of hemagglutination. Antibody titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution showing HI. Immune sera prepared from mouse blood samples were treated with VCNA, heat-inactivated at 56°C for 30 min and tested by HI assay using 8 HAU of sH53 as described above.


Total antibody titers against sH53 were determined by using a sH53-specific ELISA. To this end, 96-well Nunc MaxiSorp plates coated with 0.5 µg sH53 per well were incubated with limiting dilutions of chicken or mouse sera. After extensive washing, the plates were incubated with goat-anti-chicken or goat-anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with HRP. Peroxidase activity was visualized using tetramethylbenzidine substrate (BioFX) and an ELISA reader (EL-808 [BioTEK]), reading the OD at 450 nm. The OD values of the 250-fold diluted samples, which were in the logarithmic phase of the curve, were plotted.


Expression, purification, and characterization of sH53

In order to express soluble trimeric subtype 5 HA (sH53) in mammalian cells, the H5 ectodomain-coding sequence was first cloned into an appropriate expression vector. In the pCD5 vector used, the H5-sequence was preceded by a signal peptide-encoding sequence, to allow efficient secretion of the recombinant protein, and followed by sequences coding for the GCN4 isoleucine-zipper trimerizaton motif [21] and the Strep-tag II, the latter for purification purposes (Fig. 1A). Expression of the H5 ectodomain was achieved by transient transfection of the expression plasmid into HEK cells. Expression and secretion of the H5 protein was verified by subjecting cell culture supernatant to gel electrophoresis followed by western blotting using an antibody directed against Strep-tag II (Fig. 1B). The results show that the recombinant H5 protein could be readily detected in the cell culture supernatant after transfection of the cells with the expression plasmid, but not after mock transfection. The secreted H5 protein was purified in a single step protocol by using Strep-tactin sepharose beads. Protein yields varied between 0.4–1 mg of recombinant protein per 100 ml cell culture medium. After purification of the H5 protein from the cell culture supernatant, the oligomeric state of the H5 protein was analyzed by gel filtration column chromatography (Fig. 1C). The bulk of the H5 protein eluted with the velocity of an oligomer, while only a minor fraction was found as aggregates in the void volume. The trimeric nature of the H5 oligomer was confirmed using blue-native gel electrophoresis followed by western blotting (Fig. 1D). When the H5 preparation was heat-denatured for increasing time periods prior to electrophoresis, the initially trimeric HA species dissociated into dimers and monomers. The biological activity of the purified sH53 was studied using a solid phase-binding assay with the sialylated blood glycoprotein fetuin. Binding of sH53 was measured by means of the HRP conjugated to the anti-Strep-tag II antibody as detailed in the Material and Methods section. The H5 preparation exhibited a concentration dependent binding to the fetuin. This binding was sialic acid-dependent, as no binding was observed when the fetuin had been treated with neuraminidase (VCNA; Fig. 1E). In conclusion, biologically active sH53 was efficiently produced using a mammalian expression system and readily purified.

Figure 1
Expression, purification and biological activity of recombinant, soluble trimeric H5 protein.

Efficacy of sH53 as a vaccine against lethal HPAI H5N1 infection in chickens

To examine the immunogenicity of sH53 and its potential as a vaccine a first experiment in chickens was performed, in which 10 chickens were vaccinated twice (on day 0 and 21) i.m. with 10 µg of Stimune-adjuvanted sH53 and challenged 3 weeks later by i.n./i.t. inoculation of a lethal dose of A/Viet Nam/1194/04 virus. Another 10 birds were mock-vaccinated to serve as challenge controls. As shown in Fig. 2, the boost vaccination with 10 µg sH53 conferred complete protection. None of the vaccinated chickens died or showed symptoms indicative of influenza-related disease, whereas all mock-vaccinated chickens succumbed within 2 days. Serological analysis showed that none of the mock-vaccinated animals contained antibodies against sH53 as determined by a sH53-specific ELISA (Fig. 2B). In contrast, all immunized animals demonstrated appreciable levels of HA antibodies already after a single immunization and these levels increased further after the boost. These total antibody levels against sH53 correlated nicely with the HI titers against H5N1 (Fig. 2C). All mock-vaccinated chickens had a HI titer below the detection limit. HI antibody titers observed after the sH53 boost reached with a maximum of 1024 and a minimum of 64, which was apparently still sufficient to protect the animal against the lethal challenge. Interestingly, 50% of the birds developed HI antibody titers equal to 64 or higher already three weeks after the first vaccination. In addition, HI titers were also determined by using sH53 rather than H5N1 virus as the hemagglutinating agent, which gave essentially similar results (compare Fig. 2D and 2C), demonstrating the reliability of the assay. In summary, the results show that chickens vaccinated twice with sH53 are protected against a lethal challenge with H5N1. The HI titers observed suggested that one vaccination might already be sufficient to confer protection against HPAI H5N1.

Figure 2
sH53 vaccination in chickens.

Vaccination efficacy in chickens: effect of antigen dose and vaccination booster

These results prompted us to determine the minimal sH53 dose required to confer protection and to examine whether a single dose could already be sufficient. In the second vaccination-challenge experiment, chickens were thus vaccinated with 10, 2 or 0.4 µg of sH53 either once or twice and challenged four weeks later by infection with a lethal dose of A/Viet Nam/1194/04 as described above. The results are shown in Fig. 3. Again, all mock-vaccinated birds succumbed to the infection within 2 days. Vaccinating twice with a dose of 0.4 µg of sH53 was sufficient to protect 90% of the chickens against mortality, while all chickens survived when a dose of 2 or 10 µg was similarly administered (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, also single vaccination with sH53 could induce sufficient immunity to protect chickens against lethal infection (Fig. 3B); when a dose of 2 µg was given only one chicken died (90% protection), whereas a dose of 10 µg was protective to all birds. Even after a single dose of 0.4 µg, 60% of the chickens were protected against death.

Figure 3
sH53 dose titration after a single or boost vaccination in chickens.

Serological analysis showed that protection against the lethal H5N1 challenge correlated well with the observed antibody levels against sH53 as determined by ELISA (Fig. 3C–D) and by HI assay (Fig. 3E–F). Both assays revealed a dose-dependent antibody response, which was substantially enhanced after the booster immunization. Relatively high HA antibody levels were observed after two immunizations, even with the lower dose, except in two animals, one of which did not survive the challenge (Fig. 3C). Also after a single immunization, significant antibody levels were measured, except again in the low dose group. Here, 5 animals had hardly measurable ELISA titers. Consistently, 4 of these animals succumbed to the challenge. Also the one animal that died after a single immunization with 2 µg of sH53 did not have detectable sH53 antibodies. Essentially the same results as with the ELISA were obtained with the HI assay using sH53 as the hemagglutinating agent (Fig. 3E–F). Thus, the animals that succumbed to the lethal challenge after a single immunization also exhibited the lowest HI titers.

Shedding of challenge virus from vaccinated chickens

We analyzed whether vaccination with sH53 decreased or prevented chickens from shedding challenge virus. For practical reasons, virus shedding was analyzed by a quantitative RT PCR rather than by measuring infectious virus titers. To this end, trachea and cloaca swabs were taken from the chickens of the vaccine dose titration experiment of Fig. 3 at 2, 4 and 7 days after the challenge inoculation. The tracheal and the cloacal swab sampled from each chicken at each particular day were pooled and the presence of viral RNA in the pooled swabs was analyzed using a quantitative RT PCR assay detecting the M1 gene. The results are shown in Table 1. Of the chickens that received a booster vaccination, only 2 birds, both of which had received the lowest amount of antigen, tested positive. Notably, these were the two animals that developed the lowest sH53-specific antibody titers (Fig. 3C). One of these animals did not survive the challenge. Virus shedding could not be detected in any of the other birds, although 3 swabs gave inconclusive results. Of the chickens vaccinated only once, all animals that died tested positive. None of the birds vaccinated with 10 µg sH53 tested positive. Of the chickens vaccinated with a lower dose and surviving, two tested positive, but only at day 2 p.i. In conclusion, the vaccinated birds that could control the lethal HPAI H5N1 challenge infection exhibited minimum or no virus shedding.

Table 1
Virus detection in tracheal and cloacal swabs collected from vaccinated chickens after challenge with H5N1.

Efficacy of sH53 vaccine against a lethal HPAI H5N1 infection in mice

Finally we examined whether sH53 would also confer protection in mice. Therefore, 2 groups of 10 mice were vaccinated either once (on day 21) or twice (on day 0 and 21) with 2 µg of sH53 adjuvanted with Stimune and challenged three weeks later by intranasal inoculation with ~10 LD50 of H5N1 A/Viet Nam/1194/04. The percentage of mice surviving the infection, median clinical scores and body weights per group observed after the challenge inoculation are shown in Fig. 4. All mock-vaccinated mice succumbed to infection or had to be euthanized by day 9 p.i.. These mice showed severe clinical signs, including respiratory distress and significant weight loss, which continued until the animals died. A booster vaccination with sH53 provided 100% protection against the lethal dose of A/Viet Nam/1194/04; none of the mice showed significant signs of disease and their body weights remained constant. A single vaccination with sH53 did not protect mice against disease and concurrent weight loss; yet 40% of the mice survived. These mice started to recover from day 9 p.i. onwards as demonstrated by their regain of body weight. (Fig. 4C). Fig. 4D shows the pre-challenge anti-sH53 antibody levels in individual serum samples,as determined by ELISA. Such antibodies could be detected in most vaccinated animals. However, after a single immunization, these levels remained very low compared to those in animals that received a booster vaccination. These results were essentially confirmed by determining the HI titers against sH53 in the same serum samples. With the exception of one animal, the serum of which demonstrated high levels of auto-agglutination, all mice displayed high HI titers when vaccinated twice and low HI titers when vaccinated once. Thus, mice vaccinated twice with sH53 were protected against a lethal challenge with HPAI H5N1, while a single vaccination provided partial protection. The differences in protection correlated with the observed serum HI titers.

Figure 4
sH53 vaccination of mice.


Despite all the-understandable-attention drawn in the past year by media and scientific community to the new pandemic influenza A virus H1N1, a large influenza threat continues to be posed by HPAI H5N1. In 2009, HPAI H5N1 was found in wild birds in Germany, China, Mongolia and the Russion Federation, several outbreaks of the virus in poultry were reported in Viet Nam, Hong Kong, Nepal, India, Bangladesh, Egypt, Lao DPR, and Cambodia, while H5N1 remained endemic in large areas of Indonesia. That same year also dozens of confirmed human cases were reported (WHO timeline of major events; Even though the virus has so far remained restricted in its ability to infect humans and initiate efficient human-to-human transmission, its persistence and spread among wild birds and poultry holds a continual risk of the emergence of a pandemic strain. This threat can be reduced by vaccination of poultry against H5N1 as this would limit the propagation of the virus and minimize the risk of bird-to-human transmission. In addition, in case a human pandemic H5N1strain would emerge, there would be an immediate need for effective and reliable vaccines matching the pandemic strain. In the present study we evaluated the vaccine potential of a recombinant soluble H5 protein (sH53) to protect chickens and mice against a lethal infection with HPAI H5N1. The recombinant HA vaccine, which has a short development cycle, proved to be protective after a single immunization in its natural host, while a booster vaccination was needed to confer complete protection in a mammalian model. In addition, the sH53 induced immunity prevented viral shedding from chickens. These promising results warrant further research into the development of recombinant soluble HA as a fast, safe and effective alternative vaccine not only against H5N1, but against other influenza A viruses as well.

The recombinant HA expression cassette was constructed such that the HA protein was produced and secreted by cells in high yields as a bioactive trimer. The importance of the oligomeric state of the HA protein for the induction of neutralizing antibodies has recently been demonstrated [16]. High-molecular-weight oligomers and trimers, but not monomers, were found to efficiently induce neutralizing antibodies in mice. This difference was attributed to the preferential induction of antibodies against epitopes present in the monomeric, but not in the trimeric form [16]. While the soluble recombinant HA trimers were purified using metal affinity chromatography followed by ion-exchange chromatography in previous studies [16], [19], we used a protocol based on the Strep-tag system [23]. Proteins with a Strep-tag exhibit high affinity towards Strep-tactin, an engineered form of streptavidin. By exploiting this highly specific interaction, Strep-tagged proteins can be isolated in one step. Furthermore, because the Strep-tag elutes under gentle, physiological conditions it is especially suited for the generation of native proteins [24], a characteristic that in the case of HA may contribute to the ability of the recombinant protein to induce neutralizing antibodies.

The efficacy of the sH53 vaccine was first studied in chickens. Adjuvanted with Stimune, a water-in-oil adjuvant also known as Specol, the sH53 protein formulation induced an immunity that was completely protective against a lethal H5N1 challenge after administration of two doses (≥2 µg sH53/dose). Importantly, our vaccine preparation also protected chickens after a single immunization. While 100% of the chickens were protected after vaccination with 10 µg sH53, 90% were protected when using 2 µg. Similar HA doses were previously needed to protect chickens with a vaccine preparation consisting of full length HA proteins, which had been purified from insect cell cultures infected with recombinant baculovirus expressing the H5 gene, emulsified in a water-in-oil adjuvant [17]. These results are consistent with the observation that mammalian cell-produced HA trimers elicited similar levels of neutralizing antibodies as trimeric HA produced in insect cells [16]. The efficacy of our sH53 vaccine preparation was furthermore demonstrated by the absence of viral RNA in the protected birds. This would imply that a vaccinated flock can pose a barrier against further spread of circulating virus.

Most conventional influenza vaccines require two vaccination rounds to produce antibody titers sufficiently high to confer full protection to chickens. In this regard, vaccination with sHA3 provides potential advantages over other vaccine approaches. However, the production costs per dose of sHA3 compared to egg-cultured inactivated whole-virus vaccines might be higher, even though recombinant protein expression in mammalian cell culture systems has been shown to be highly scalable and productive, with expression levels up to the order of grams of protein per liter [25], [26]. sHA3 vaccination could however be economically feasible in epidemic situations when millions of chickens have to be vaccinated individually, provided that a single preventive vaccination would suffice. Moreover, vaccinated flocks housed in endangered regions rapidly achieve a state of protective immunity. This may be a particularly valuable feature in the event of a pandemic, when the virus transmission cycle needs to be interrupted as soon as possible and the risk of exposure of farmers, veterinarians and people in monitoring teams to potentially zoonotic HPAI should be limited to the upmost extent.

The efficacy of the sH53 vaccine was also studied in mice. The vaccine preparation was completely protective against a lethal H5N1 challenge after 2 doses. Immunization with a single dose resulted in 40% survival. These differences in protection levels correlated with the observed anti-sH53 titers in the animals' sera. As the dose (2 µg) received by the mice is at least comparable, relative to their body weights, to the dose that conferred complete protection in chickens after a single immunization (10 µg), these results appear to suggest that the sH53 is more effective in conferring a protective immune response in chickens than in mice. The reason for this apparent discrepancy is unclear and warrants further investigations. In the only other study so far that used soluble HA trimers as a vaccine preparation in mice, much less protection against challenge with H5N1 was observed after two immunizations [19]. Although the H5 trimer produced in this latter study differed from the one that we used, with respect to the trimerization motif (t4 foldon vs GCN4 trimerization motif) and the purification tag (His tag vs Strep tag II), the difference is more likely to be explained by the different adjuvant used (Alum vs Stimune). Alum is known to induce low antibody titers when used with subunit vaccines [27], while Stimune has been reported to generate long-lasting, functional antibody responses [28], [29], [30]. Stimune is however not licensed for human use.

In conclusion, we have shown that the sH53 protein produced in mammalian cells elicited protective immune responses in mice and chickens when adjuvanted with Stimune. Chickens protected against the lethal H5N1 challenge also did not shed the virus at day 7 post infection. As these recombinant HA vaccines can be manufactured with high yields and a relatively short lead time, they offer an attractive alternative vaccination strategy, which will allow a rapid response to circulating and potentially pandemic influenza viruses.


The authors would like to thank Marius Dwars for providing us with chicken erythrocytes and the groups of Peter van Rossum and Simon Riemersma for assistance with the animal experiments.


Competing Interests: The authors P.J.M.R. and C.A.M.d.H. have filed a patent application based on findings reported in this study. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Funding: This work has been financially supported by the Economic Structure Enhancing Fund: “Impulse Veterinary Avian Influenza Research in the Netherlands”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:152–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Munster VJ, Fouchier RA. Avian influenza virus: of virus and bird ecology. Vaccine. 2009;27:6340–6344. [PubMed]
3. Uyeki TM. Global epidemiology of human infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses. Respirology. 2008;13(Suppl 1):S2–9. [PubMed]
4. Yen HL, Webster RG. Pandemic influenza as a current threat. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;333:3–24. [PubMed]
5. Ellebedy AH, Webby RJ. Influenza vaccines. Vaccine. 2009;27(Suppl 4):D65–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Safdar A, Cox MM. Baculovirus-expressed influenza vaccine. A novel technology for safe and expeditious vaccine production for human use. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16:927–934. [PubMed]
7. Keitel WA, Atmar RL. Vaccines for pandemic influenza: summary of recent clinical trials. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;333:431–451. [PubMed]
8. Mueller SN, Langley WA, Carnero E, Garcia-Sastre A, Ahmed R. Immunization with live-attenuated influenza viruses expressing altered NS1 proteins results in potent and protective memory CD8+T cells responses. J Virol. 2010;84:1847–1855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Kreijtz JH, Suezer Y, van Amerongen G, de Mutsert G, Schnierle BS, et al. Recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara-based vaccine induces protective immunity in mice against infection with influenza virus H5N1. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:1598–1606. [PubMed]
10. Gao W, Soloff AC, Lu X, Montecalvo A, Nguyen DC, et al. Protection of mice and poultry from lethal H5N1 avian influenza virus through adenovirus-based immunization. J Virol. 2006;80:1959–1964. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Wu Q, Fang L, Wu X, Li B, Luo R, et al. A pseudotype baculovirus-mediated vaccine confers protective immunity against lethal challenge with H5N1 avian influenza virus in mice and chickens. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2210–2217. [PubMed]
12. Dinapoli JM, Nayak B, Yang L, Finneyfrock BW, Cook A, et al. Newcastle disease virus-vectored vaccines expressing the hemagglutinin or neuraminidase protein of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus protect against virus challenge in monkeys. J Virol. 2010:1489–1503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Rao S, Kong WP, Wei CJ, Yang ZY, Nason M, et al. Multivalent HA DNA vaccination protects against highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza infection in chickens and mice. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. van Oirschot JT. Present and future of veterinary viral vaccinology: a review. Vet Q. 2001;23:100–108. [PubMed]
15. Biesova Z, Miller MA, Schneerson R, Shiloach J, Green KY, et al. Preparation, characterization, and immunogenicity in mice of a recombinant influenza H5 hemagglutinin vaccine against the avian H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 influenza virus. Vaccine. 2009;27:6234–6238. [PubMed]
16. Wei CJ, Xu L, Kong WP, Shi W, Canis K, et al. Comparative efficacy of neutralizing antibodies elicited by recombinant hemagglutinin proteins from avian H5N1 influenza virus. J Virol. 2008;82:6200–6208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Crawford J, Wilkinson B, Vosnesensky A, Smith G, Garcia M, et al. Baculovirus-derived hemagglutinin vaccines protect against lethal influenza infections by avian H5 and H7 subtypes. Vaccine. 1999;17:2265–2274. [PubMed]
18. Bhattacharya P, Grimme S, Ganesh B, Gopisetty A, Sheng JR, et al. Nanodisc-incorporated hemagglutinin provides protective immunity against influenza virus infection. J Virol. 2010;84:361–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Wang CC, Chen JR, Tseng YC, Hsu CH, Hung YF, et al. Glycans on influenza hemagglutinin affect receptor binding and immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:18137–18142. [PubMed]
20. Zeng Q, Langereis MA, van Vliet AL, Huizinga EG, de Groot RJ. Structure of coronavirus hemagglutinin-esterase offers insight into corona and influenza virus evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9065–9069. [PubMed]
21. Harbury PB, Zhang T, Kim PS, Alber T. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 1993;262:1401–1407. [PubMed]
22. Reeves PJ, Hwa J, Khorana HG. Structure and function in rhodopsin: kinetic studies of retinal binding to purified opsin mutants in defined phospholipid-detergent mixtures serve as probes of the retinal binding pocket. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:1927–1931. [PubMed]
23. Terpe K. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;60:523–533. [PubMed]
24. Zwicker N, Adelhelm K, Thiericke R, Grabley S, Hanel F. Strep-tag II for one-step affinity purification of active bHLHzip domain of human c-Myc. Biotechniques. 1999;27:368–375. [PubMed]
25. Tchoudakova A, Hensel F, Murillo A, Eng B, Foley M, et al. High level expression of functional human IgMs in human PER.C6 cells. MAbs. 2009;1:163–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Durocher Y, Butler M. Expression systems for therapeutic glycoprotein production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:700–707. [PubMed]
27. Gupta RK. Aluminum compounds as vaccine adjuvants. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998;32:155–172. [PubMed]
28. Beck I, Gerlach H, Burkhardt E, Kaleta EF. Investigation of several selected adjuvants regarding their efficacy and side effects for the production of a vaccine for parakeets to prevent a disease caused by a paramyxovirus type 3. Vaccine. 2003;21:1006–1022. [PubMed]
29. Herfst S, de Graaf M, Schrauwen EJ, Ulbrandt ND, Barnes AS, et al. Immunization of Syrian golden hamsters with F subunit vaccine of human metapneumovirus induces protection against challenge with homologous or heterologous strains. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:2702–2709. [PubMed]
30. Leenaars PP, Hendriksen CF, Angulo AF, Koedam MA, Claassen E. Evaluation of several adjuvants as alternatives to the use of Freund's adjuvant in rabbits. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;40:225–241. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science