One consequence of gene duplication is that it allows the two copies to subdivide the functions of the ancestral copy (functional specialization or sub-functionalization), or for one copy to acquire a new function (neo-functionalization) while the other retains the original function, thus preserving fitness; but is there evidence for either functional specialization or acquisition of novel functions among
PRR genes during evolution of the angiosperms? The strongest evidence comes from
Arabidopsis, where clock function is best studied.
TOC1 and four other
PRR genes each show circadian oscillations in transcript abundance, with peak abundance occurring at intervals spanning the day starting at dawn with
PRR9, followed by
PRR7,
PRR5,
PRR3, and finally at dusk with
TOC1 (
PRR1) [
4,
5]. As shown in Figure , TOC1 is recruited to the
CCA1 promoter and is a positive regulator of
CCA1 expression, although the molecular details remain incompletely described [
1]. PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5 are recruited to the promoters of
CCA1 and
LHY and negatively regulate their expression [
10]. It is likely that the sequential expression of
PRR9,
PRR7, and
PRR5 contributes to sustained repression of
CCA1 and
LHY expression throughout the day. This indicates that, while the function of these three genes is partially redundant, with normal expression of the three genes the temporal window of
CCA1/
LHY repression is extended. Thus
PRR9,
PRR7, and
PRR5 offer an example of sub-functionalization in the temporal domain. Although the function of the rice (
Oryza sativa) orthologs of
PRR9,
PRR7, and
PRR5 has not been established, there is a similar sequential pattern of expression of
OsPRR73/
OsPRR37 and then
OsPRR95/
OsPRR59, followed by
OsTOC1 (
OsPRR1) [
11].
In
Arabidopsis, the
PRR3 gene offers an example of acquisition of a novel function.
PRR9,
PRR7, and
PRR5 all have a similar role in negatively regulating
CCA1 and
LHY, suggesting that this represents the ancestral function (Figure ).
PRR3 appears, instead, to have acquired a novel and specialized function in the vascular tissue, where PRR3 binds to TOC1 and, in doing so, blocks the interaction of TOC1 with ZTL, the F-box protein that targets TOC1 for proteasomal degradation [
12]. Thus,
PRR3 exhibits a restricted domain of expression and has acquired a novel function, the regulation of TOC1 stability through protein-protein interaction (Figure ). In
Arabidopsis, loss of
PRR3 function confers only a very small shortening of circadian period [
13], which is consistent with the apparent loss of
PRR3 in poplar, without concomitant perturbation of clock function.
There are additional suggestions of evolving function in the
PRR7 lineage. In
Arabidopsis,
PRR7 contributes to the determination of flowering time, although the effects are not large and
PRR7 is not a major determinant of flowering time among natural populations [
14]. In contrast, in the monocots barley and wheat,
PRR7 (
Ppd-H1 and
Ppd-D1, respectively) is one of the major determinants of photoperiod sensitivity and flowering time [
15,
16]. Whether this represents a true acquisition of novel function in the monocots or a loss of function in the eudicots remains uncertain and will require more detailed dissection of the roles of
PRR7 in the flowering pathways of monocots and eudicots.