The future-oriented department chair.
Acad Med. 2004;79:571–577. [PubMed]
The new leader: New demands in a changing, turbulent environment.
J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:79–87. [PubMed]
Development of physician leadership competencies: Perceptions of
physician leaders, physician educators and medical students.
J Health Admin Educ. 2004;21:343–354. [PubMed]
Equipping physicians to lead: Principles for innovation.
Am J Surg. 2000;180:185–186. [PubMed]
Leadership in academic general pediatrics.
J Pediatr. 2007;150:451–452. [PubMed]
Climbing through medicine's glass ceiling.
N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1887–1889. [PubMed]
Women's health and women in academic medicine: Hitting the same
J Womens Health. 2008;17:1453–1462. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the
productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty.
Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:532–538. [PubMed]
A “ton of feathers”: Gender
discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it.
J Womens Health. 2003;12:1009–1018. [PubMed]
Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling
or sticky floor?
JAMA. 1995;273:1022–1025. [PubMed]
Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?
J Manage. 2002;28:177–193.
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Psychol Rev. 2002;109:573–598. [PubMed]
The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and
leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders.
Organ Behav Hum. 2008;106:39–60.
An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research.
Br Med J. 2008;337:404–407. [PubMed]
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
Qualitative research—Grounded theory, mixed methods,
and action research.
Br Med J. 2008;337:2:459–461. [PubMed]
Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing
grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
Sampling in qualitative research: Purposeful and theoretical
sampling; merging or clear boundaries.
J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:623–630. [PubMed]
Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009.
Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. 2nd. New York: Longman; 1999.
Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
Grounded theory, 1984–1994. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1995.
Validity and validation in the making in the context of
Qual Health Res. 2008;18:983–989. [PubMed]
appearance and sex as sources of gender-stereotypic attributions.
Swiss J Psychol. 2006;65:15–23.
Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women.
J Soc Issues. 2001;57:743–762.
Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent
women's ascent up the organizational ladder.
J Soc Issues. 2001;57:657–674.
The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite
management characteristics among college students.
Sex Roles. 1989;20:103–110.
Gender and social influence.
J Soc Issues. 2001;57:725–741.
Gender, status, and leadership.
J Soc Issues. 2001;57:637–655.
The influence of gender-stereotyped perfumes on leadership
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2002;32:815–828.
Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1987.
The measurement of psychological androgeny.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42:155–162. [PubMed]
Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. Handbook of
gender and work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999. pp. 203–222.
Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon?
J Organ Behav. 1996;17:33–41.
The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite
management characteristics revisited.
Acad Manage J. 1989;32:662–669.
Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male
J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:416–427. [PubMed]
Double standards for competence: Theory and research.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:21–42.
Double standards in the evaluation of men and women.
Soc Psychol Q. 1996;59:237–254.
Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite
management characteristics among female managers.
J Appl Psychol. 1975;60:340–344. [PubMed]
Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied
J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:81–92. [PubMed]
Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 1992;111:3–22.
Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:1030–1041.
Status in groups: The importance of motivation.
Am Sociol Rev. 1982;47:76–88.
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits
of counterstereotypical impression management.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:629–645. [PubMed]
To be or not to be (self-promoting): The consequences of
counterstereotypical impression management. In:
, editor. Power and influence in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1988. pp. 287–310.
Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders:
Implications for leadership evaluations.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58:48–59.
Evaluative affect display toward male and female leaders of
Small Group Research. 2005;36:678–703.
Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In:
, editor. The psychology of gender. 2nd. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. pp. 217–241.
Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career
Am Sociol Rev 2004. 2004;69:93–113.
Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 1995;117:125–145. [PubMed]
van Engen ML.
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership
styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men.
Psychol Bull. 2003;129:569–691. [PubMed]
Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from
individual and institutional perspectives.
J High Educ. 2003;74:1–25.
Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 1990;108:233–256.
Two decades of research and development in transformational
Eur J Work Organ Psy. 1999;8:9–32.
Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional
leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature.
Leadership Q. 1996;7:385–425.
Herding academic cats: Faculty reactions to transformational and
contingent reward leadership by department chairs.
J Leadership Stud. 2002;8:79–94.
Physician leadership styles and effectiveness: An empirical study.
Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62:720–740. [PubMed]
Faculty and staff members' perceptions of effective leadership:
Are there differences between women and men leaders?
Equity Excellence Educ. 2003;36:71–81.
The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence.
Leadership Q. 2003;14:807–834.
The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in
precarious leadership positions.
Br J Manage. 2005;16:81–90.
Who will lead?
Physician Exec. 1997;23:37–40. [PubMed]
New ways of understanding and accomplishing leadership in
J Surg Res. 2004;117:177–186. [PubMed]
What skills do physician leaders need now and in the future?
Physician Exec. 2001;27:46–48. [PubMed]
A time for transformative leadership in academic health sciences.
Clin Invest Med. 2007;30:E127–E132. [PubMed]
Leadership and strategic alignment—Getting people on
board and engaged.
J Surg Res. 2001;96:144–151. [PubMed]
Leadership in action.
J Surg Res. 2002;106:225–232. [PubMed]
Eyewitness to leadership.
Am Surg. 2003;69:56–58. [PubMed]
Building our future: A plea for leadership.
World J Surg. 2004;28:445–450. [PubMed]
Leadership values in academic medicine.
Acad Med. 2006;81:20–26. [PubMed]