PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Soc Hypertens. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 11.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2867460
NIHMSID: NIHMS60608

Treating hypertension while protecting the vulnerable islet in the cardiometabolic syndrome

Abstract

Hypertension, a multifactorial-polygenic disease, interacts with multiple environmental stressors and results in functional and structural changes in numerous end organs, including the cardiovascular system. This can result in coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, insulin resistance, and damage to the pancreatic islet. Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for major health problems encountered in clinical practice. Whereas hypertension was once thought to be a medical condition based on discrete blood pressure readings, a new concept has emerged defining hypertension as part of a complex and progressive metabolic and cardiovascular disease, an important part of a cardiometabolic syndrome. The central role of insulin resistance, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, metabolic signaling defects within tissues, and the role of enhanced tissue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity as it relates to hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus is emphasized. Additionally, this review focuses on the effect of hypertension on functional and structural changes associated with the vulnerable pancreatic islet. Various classes of antihypertensive drugs are reviewed, especially their roles in delaying or preventing damage to the vulnerable pancreatic islet, and thus delaying the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Keywords: antihypertensive treatment, islet amyloid, insulin resistance, renin inhibitor, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress

INTRODUCTION

Primary hypertension has complex causes and is considered a multifactorial-polygenic disease that interacts with multiple environmental conditions and stressors, with numerous diverse harmful effects (Table 1 and Figure 1) [1]. It accounts for approximately 80% to 90% of all patients with hypertension and has no single identifiable cause, whereas specific causes of secondary hypertension include various renal (including chronic kidney disease) and endocrine disorders. Another emerging cause of secondary hypertension is obstructive sleep apnea, which may be the most frequent of this latter subset of conditions, partially due to the obesity epidemic (Table 1). Obesity and aging are powerful factors contributing to an increased prevalence of hypertension; however, excessive activity of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), endothelial dysfunction, oxidative-redox stress, and inflammation act synergistically with obesity, insulin resistance (IR), and aging.

Figure 1
The hypertension mandala. Clustering of the cardiometabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factors. IR is central to the development of hypertension and IGT–T2DM, along with multiple metabolic and clinical conditions surrounding the outer portions ...
Table 1
A simple classification of hypertension

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are common comorbidities that are associated with substantially increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [2, 3]. Of patients with newly diagnosed T2DM, more than half have coexisting hypertension, and approximately 50% of patients with hypertension develop T2DM over a 10- to 15-year period [4]. Hypertension is linked to other CVD risk factors, including IR and compensatory hyperinsulinemia-hyperamylinemia, which is associated with multiple metabolic toxicities [5]. A common pathologic abnormality associated with these comorbidities is enhanced oxidative stress and resultant increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), which results in detrimental cellular and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in end organs, including the endocrine pancreas [6].

An important consideration for the clinician is mounting evidence that the various classes of antihypertensive drugs have different metabolic and structural effects, which may ultimately encourage, delay, or prevent the onset of the development of T2DM [7, 8]. Additionally, nonpharmacologic interventions represent an important complementary and essential approach to T2DM prevention [1].

This review discusses the pathophysiologic characteristics of hypertension from metabolic and structural perspectives in the islet, summarizes the effects of major classes of antihypertensive agents on the development of T2DM, and describes pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to reduce the risk for new-onset T2DM in individuals with hypertension.

HYPERTENSION: CLUSTERING OF CARDIOMETABOLIC-CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS

Numerous metabolic abnormalities contribute to and result from hypertension. A characteristic feature of the cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS), T2DM, and hypertension is diminished sensitivity of tissues to insulin, including hepatocytes, adipocytes, endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells (Figure 2) [4, 5, 9] and, specifically, skeletal muscle (Figure 3) [5]. A brief overview of these abnormalities, summarized in Figure 3 [5], has been the focus of recent reviews [4, 5, 7, 9]. An activated tissue RAAS and associated overproduction of ROS contribute to IR. Skeletal muscle resistance to the metabolic actions of insulin is associated with signaling defects: glucose transporter-4 translocation, phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3) and its downstream protein kinase B (Akt)–mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway, and diminished production of endothelial-derived nitric oxide (NO); skeletal muscle changes: increase in type II muscle fibers, increased lipid deposition, decreased sarcolemma mitochondrial numbers, and decreased lipoprotein lipase activity; ROS generation: endothelial dysfunction (endothelial NO synthase [eNOS] uncoupling), tissue remodeling, endothelial-tissue uncoupling, and decreased insulin stimulation of PI3 kinase (PI3K) as well as development of hepatic steatosis and pancreatic islet β-cell loss; hyperinsulinemia-hyperamylinemia: resorption, excretion, and transport defects, SNS activation, RAAS activation–angiotensin II (Ang II) excess, and oxidative stress; Ang II/aldosterone actions: interference with insulin signaling, decreased insulin secretion, and triglyceride accumulation in skeletal muscle, liver, and pancreas; and pancreatic functional and structural abnormalities: altered islet perfusion by increased RAAS activation, formation and deposition of pancreatic islet amyloid, and islet fibrosis.

Figure 2
Brief summary of the major metabolic and structural alterations in hypertension [4, 5, 7].
Figure 3
Counterregulatory roles of insulin and angiotensin II in glucose utilization: the role of oxidative stress [5].

THE CMS and HYPERTENSION

Hypertension is a major component of the CMS, a condition known by several names, including the metabolic syndrome and syndrome X [6]. Important contributors to the CMS, a constellation of risk factors affecting approximately 50 million people in the United States [10], are obesity, genetics, and a sedentary lifestyle [4]. In addition to hypertension, other components include IR (with compensatory hyperinsulinemia-hyperamylinemia),abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia (increased triglyceride levels, small low-density lipoprotein [LDL] particles, low levels of high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol), microalbuminuria/reduced renal function, fibrinolytic and inflammatory abnormalities, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative-redox stress, hepatic steatosis, and hypercoagulability [10, 11]. According to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, when 3 or more readily measured risk determinants are present, a diagnosis of the CMS should be made (Table 2) [10]. This constellation of risk factors is associated with an increased risk for CVD, including stroke, T2DM, CKD, polycystic ovary syndrome, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. These conditions are associated with end-organ structural remodeling of the arterial vasculature, heart, islet, kidney, ovary, and liver.

Table 2
National Cholesterol Education Program Criteria for Diagnosis* of the metabolic syndrome-cardiometabolic syndrome [10]

INSULIN RESISTANCE

IR occurs when the ability of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake and disposal by skeletal muscle is impaired [12]. A strong relationship between IR and hypertension has been identified [5, 13]. Defective insulin signaling occurs in patients with hypertension, and drug-naive patients with hypertension have greater fasting and postprandial insulin levels than age-and sex-matched normotensive individuals regardless of weight (Figure 3) [5, 1215]. However, there is no link between increased plasma insulin levels and secondary hypertension [12, 13]. IR and hypertension coexist in rats with genetic IR [13, 16, 17], suggesting that genetic predisposition contributes to both IR and hypertension [13]. The presence of altered glucose metabolism in normotensive children of parents with hypertension supports this hypothesis [12, 13, 15]. In addition, some persons with coexisting IR and hypertension have specific metabolic genetic defects [18, 19]. There is an increasing body of evidence that increased tissue activation of the RAAS and associated oxidative stress impairs insulin signaling in skeletal muscle and other tissues (Figure 3) [5].

Compensatory Hyperinsulinemia

Normally insulin exerts vasodilatory effects, in part, through activation of endothelial-derived vascular relaxation. IR results in decreased endothelial and vascular smooth muscle metabolic responses to insulin: this results in diminished vasorelaxation responses to insulin and insulin-like growth factor [4,5, 20].

Hyperinsulinemia is intimately linked to IR and hypertension; however, an intact β cell–insulin compensatory secretory axis to IR plays a key role in vasodilation, as well as in glucose transport and homeostasis, because insulin normally has vasodilatory properties [4, 5, 20]. Although the compensatory hyperinsulinemia that results from IR temporarily delays the development of diabetes, as demonstrated in rat studies, it has other effects that may ultimately increase blood pressure (BP) [4]. Hyperinsulinemia promotes reabsorption of sodium and water in proximal renal tubules, leading to volume expansion and BP increase [4], which may amplify SNS activity [12] and may activate the RAAS [21, 22]. However, there is no direct experimental evidence suggesting that corrections in these defects of insulin action will decrease BP; this remains a challenge for the clinician/researcher to prove “cause and effect”. Hyperinsulinemia may also increase the number of angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors [4, 23], stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, contribute to oxidative stress and increased inflammation [5, 7], and promote vascular ECM remodeling [4]. Overwhelming experimental data suggest that the primary pathologic contributors to hypertension are related to decreased vascular sensitivity to the metabolic signaling mediated vasodilatory responses to insulin [5].

Changes in Skeletal Muscle Tissue

In persons with hypertension, IR contributes to altered insulin action in skeletal muscle tissue, which comprises 40% of body mass and is the main site of insulin-stimulated glucose utilization [7, 24]. Skeletal muscle mass and insulin sensitivity decrease in older persons and those with sedentary lifestyles, and consequently, aging and inactivity also increase the risk for IR and hypertension [7,25]. Aging and sedentary lifestyle lead to a reduction in oxidative slow twitch, insulin-sensitive muscle fibers. Further, with hypertension there is vasoconstriction and rarefaction of the microcirculatory vasculature supplying the skeletal muscle tissue and these changes lead to the reduced delivery of insulin and glucose to the skeletal muscle tissue. Finally, in hypertension there is often decreased insulin metabolic signaling leading to diminished insulin sensitivity.[5]

IR in skeletal muscle is associated with increased intracellular lipid and fat between muscle fibers [25]. An accumulation of triglycerides in muscle also occurs as a result of the ability of Ang II to increase the lipid storage capacity of adipose and skeletal tissue [26]. Increased RAAS activity decreases the differentiation of adipocytes, which are insulin sensitive and take up lipids, while increasing central, less differentiated, adipose tissue [2729]. This decrease in mature peripheral adipocytes results in more ectopic lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle, liver, and myocardial tissue. There is also increasing evidence that deficiencies in sarcolemmal mitochondrial function and decreased numbers of mitochondria contribute to insulin resistance in the CMS and T2DM [30].

Lipoprotein lipase, a secretory enzyme highly expressed by skeletal muscle, may play an important role in the link between hypertension and skeletal muscle IR [7]. Mutations of the lipoprotein lipase gene account for 52% to 73% of the total interindividual variation in systolic BP [31]. Increased lipoprotein lipase activity improves insulin sensitivity in transgenic rabbits [32]. Microvascular lipoprotein lipase enzyme activity in rat skeletal muscle decreases by about 50% during aging [33], by 80% in type II fibers compared with type I fibers [34], and by about 90% during sustained inactivity [35]. Thus, genetic or acquired deficiencies in lipoprotein lipase activity appear to contribute to the development of both IR and hypertension.

The link between impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension, and CVD may be stronger than the link found between fasting hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, and CVD [36]. These adverse effects of postprandial elevations in glucose are likely mediated, in part, by hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction resulting from eNOS uncoupling. In concert with this notion, the Diabetes Prevention Program study found a significant (but only modest) relation between fasting insulin and the prevalence of hypertension, systolic BP, and diastolic BP in 3,819 patients that had impaired glucose tolerance [37].

REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES

Patients with CMS and hypertension experience numerous metabolic abnormalities, which can be summarized with the acronym A-FLIGHT-U (Table 3) [4]. These abnormalities are marked by increased tissue levels of ROS, leading to endothelial dysfunction and harmful tissue ECM remodeling [4, 6]. Increased ambient levels of ROS are known as oxidative stress and can result from increased generation or reduced removal of these charged particles. In the CMS, both abnormalities appear to contribute to excess oxidative stress. In addition to providing an important source of ROS, a free-fatty acid increase specifically promotes IR in skeletal muscle and cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic tissue [4, 6].

Table 3
A-FLIGHT-U acronym: multiple metabolic abnormalities associated with hypertension are responsible for the generation of ROS

The increase in vascular ROS may be associated with uncoupling of the eNOS enzyme and allows the endothelium to become a net producer of even more ROS, rather than to be a net producer of the protective (local antioxidant and anti-inflammatory) gaseous NO molecule. In addition to eNOS enzyme uncoupling, there is concomitant remodeling at the endothelial tissue site, resulting in structural endothelial tissue uncoupling and dysfunction because of pericapillary ECM fibrosis in many of the end organs affected by the CMS and T2DM [38,39].

Excess glucose (glucotoxicity) is strongly associated with the impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM of the CMS and is a major contributor to islet redox stress (Figure 4) [6]. Glucose auto-oxidation, glycoxidation, A-FLIGHT-U metabolic abnormalities, the polyol-sorbitol pathway, and a decreased/depleted antioxidant network enzyme system within the β cell and pancreatic islet contribute to islet redox stress with resultant β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis [6]. Additionally, glucose is capable of scavenging endothelial NO, which contributes to the uncoupling of the eNOS enzyme. Over time, both glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity-FFA contribute to the progressive deterioration in glucose homeostasis and β-cell dysfunction. Seldom does either of the toxicities exist alone in the postprandial clinical setting of IR and the CMS and T2DM. Both contribute to the excess islet redox stress associated with the other A-FLIGHT-U abnormalities, having multiplicative adverse effects within the islet on β-cell function [40].

Figure 4
The role of glucotoxicity in the development of islet redox stress and pancreatic islet structural damage β-cell dysfunction [6].

Hypertension is also associated with the production of ROS. Recently, we demonstrated that enhanced vascular membranous nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD[P]H) oxidase enzyme and its various subunits (including RAC-1, RhoA, and GPphox 91-67-47-22) are intricately involved with the development of hypertension in conditions of activated vascular RAAS [6]. This results in the excess production of ROS and oxidative stress in a transgenic hypertensive rodent model that also demonstrates IR in the kidney, heart, and islets [6]. Thus, there is considerable evidence that RAAS-induced generation of ROS contributes to both the development of hypertension, impaired insulin secretion and IR. In summary, ROS begets ROS via a vicious positive feedback cycle and this plays a key role in the pathogenesis of CMS and T2DM (Figure 3) [5].

SIGNALING DEFECTS

Persons with hypertension may be at greater risk for the development of T2DM than normotensive individuals because of an impaired ability for insulin to promote relaxation in vascular tissue and glucose transport in skeletal muscle tissue [4]. Excess Ang II and aldosterone may inhibit insulin action in these tissues, partly by interfering with insulin signaling through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [5]. The effects of Ang II and aldosterone are partially mediated through increased generation of ROS and activation of low-molecular–weight G proteins, such as RhoA and Rac [5]. Enhanced ROS generation and RhoA activation inhibit actions mediated by PI3K/Akt signaling, resulting in decreased endothelial cell production of NO, increased myosin light chain activation (calcium sensitization) with resulting vasoconstriction, and decreased skeletal muscle glucose transport [4, 5]. This mechanism promotes vascular and ECM remodeling due to impairment of the metabolic PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and promotion of MAP/Jak kinase growth and remodeling pathway [4], a process termed the PI3/Akt–MAP/Jak kinase shunt (Figure 3)[4].

RAAS EFFECTS ON THE PANCREAS

In persons with IR, development of diabetes depends on the progressive loss of β cells and the insulin-secreting capacity of the pancreatic islets [7]. The pancreas, like many organs and tissues, has a local RAAS [4143] that appears to affect pancreatic function primarily by altering islet perfusion [44]. Ang II causes vasoconstriction in the endocrine pancreas of animals [41], contributes to the delay in first-phase insulin release in response to glucose in perfused preparations in rats [45], and blunts insulin secretion in healthy persons [46]. Additionally, activation of a local RAAS results in ECM fibrosis and further islet cell destruction related to excess ROS [4143].

STRUCTURAL REMODELING OF THE ENDOCRINE PANCREAS

The human islet pancreas in T2DM is characterized by the histologic findings of islet amyloid, intra- and peri-islet fibrosis, islet adipogenesis, arteriolosclerosis, and atherosclerosis [47]. Furthermore, a recent human case report demonstrated a previously unreported finding that the insulo-acinar-portal islet efferent vessels, which carry pancreatic islet contents (including insulin) to the liver, were involved with both peri-islet fibrosis and peri-islet amyloid deposition. This peri-islet vasculopathy due to fibrosis and amyloid deposition could contribute to the impaired first-phase insulin secretion and impaired glucose intolerance seen early in the development of T2DM in humans [48].

Intra-and peri-islet fibrosis is also a prevalent finding in the obese IR T2DM Zucker rat model, and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) each may attenuate the development of islet fibrosis and associated impaired glucose tolerance [49]. In the transgenic Ren2 model of IR and hypertension, we recently identified with transmission electron microscopy very early peri-islet fibrosis with banded collagen deposition and pericyte-pancreatic stellate cell proliferation, migration, hypertrophy, and activation [50]. Additionally, in the novel human islet-amyloid polypeptide transgenic rat model of T2DM, we were able to identify the concurrent finding of not only intra-islet amyloid, but also very early banded collagen representing intra-and peri-islet fibrosis [51]. These animal models may help us better understand the role of activated islet RAAS and oxidative stress and how these are related to structural remodeling within the islet and the peri-islet or islet exocrine interface of the pancreas in models as well as humans that we now term “isletopathy”[52, 53].

Amylin and Pancreatic Remodeling

A hallmark of T2DM is remodeling of the endocrine pancreas due to the deposition of amylin-derived islet amyloid within the islet [54]. Islet amyloid is present in up to 96% of autopsied patients with T2DM, and amylin is the monomeric substrate responsible for the polymerization, fibril formation, and amyloid deposition [55]. Amylin levels increase in persons with obesity and IR, those with impaired glucose tolerance, and persons with early T2DM [54].

The Physiologic Role of Amylin

Amylin, or islet amyloid polypeptide, is a 37-amino-acid polypeptide (Figure 5) [5456]. Like insulin, amylin (the second β-cell–derived hormone) is synthesized and secreted by islet β cells in response to glucose or nutrient stimuli and contributes to the maintenance of glucose homeostasis [4, 54]. Amylin is a potent inhibitor of gastric emptying and helps control carbohydrate delivery from the small intestine [57]. It inhibits hepatic production and release of glucose after a meal [54] and inhibits glucagon and somatostatin secretion, slowing the secretion of insulin [4]. Amylin contributes to the perception of satiety and may have a site of action within the central nervous system [58]. It has binding sites within the renal cortex [54, 59], where it promotes renin secretion [59, 60]. Amylin is cosynthesized, copackaged, and cosecreted in the insulin secretory granule of the β cell and parallels insulin secretion [4].

Figure 5
The primary structure of human amylin (islet amyloid polypeptide) [55]. Reproduced from Hayden MR, et al. J Pancreas 2005; 6: 287–302 [55]).

Formation and Deposition of Islet Amyloid

Unlike insulin, human amylin is amyloidogenic [4]. Amylin-derived islet amyloid formation and deposition occur in islets in individuals with the CMS, IR, prediabetes, and early T2DM [54]. In addition, islet amyloid and its soluble toxic oligomers (small polymers of islet amyloid polypeptide) contribute to β-cell apoptosis in T2DM (Figure 6) [55]. The oligomers of islet amyloid are responsible for β-cell apoptosis, and not the mature insoluble islet amyloid within the pancreatic islets [61]. Amylin, like other proteins, must fold properly into 3-dimensional structures to carry out its proper functions [55]. In IR, amylin may become unfolded and subsequently misfolded due to endoplasmic reticulum stress and overtax the protective refolding chaperone proteins, giving rise to islet amyloid (Figure 7A–C) [55]. Islet amyloid creates a diffusion barrier, as well as a secretory and absorptive defect, within the islet, and structurally, islet amyloid appears to interfere with trafficking and docking of the insulin secretory granule to the endothelium (Figure 7D) [4, 55, 61].

Figure 6
The progression from unfolded or misfolded amylin to the formation of insoluble amyloid fibrils [55].
Figure 7
Islet structural changes associated with amylin-derived islet amyloid deposition.

Humans normally have approximately 1 million to 1.5 million islets, and under normal conditions, there is a stable combination of replicative, senescent, and apoptotic β cells [54]. In persons with IR, glucose homeostasis continues until about half the β cells are lost or dysfunctional, and additional decrease leads to impaired glucose tolerance and, eventually, overt T2DM [54]. The progressive deposition of amylin-derived islet amyloid may be responsible for the progressive nature of T2DM.

Hyperamylinemia can activate the RAAS independently of and synergistically with hyperinsulinemia and hyperproinsulinemia, further strengthening the links between hypertension, IR, and T2DM [4]. Hyperamylinemia also predicts the future development of hypertension in normotensive children of parents with hypertension and may become a useful marker for hypertension in the future [62]. In summary, hyperamylinemia and amylin-derived islet amyloid seem to play an important role, along with IR and β-cell dysfunction, in the development and progression of T2DM.

T2DM RISK AND SELECTION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY

Clinical outcome studies have shown differences in the development of T2DM with various classes of antihypertensive agents, including thiazide diuretics, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), α-adrenergic blockers, and RAAS inhibitors. Outcome data related to new-onset T2DM, possible mechanisms by which different classes of agents promote or prevent T2DM, and treatment recommendations are summarized in Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6. Table 4 presents the results of major outcome trials [7, 6376]; Table 5 summarizes actions of the different classes of antihypertensive agents that may contribute to their effects on T2DM; Table 6 lists treatment recommendations supported by individual study results [7, 7785]. A network meta-analysis (which accounts for both direct and indirect comparisons between classes of drugs) of 22 randomized clinical trials, involving 143,153 participants, was conducted to estimate the relative odds of developing T2DM with an initial class of antihypertensive drug [86]. With diuretic therapy as the referent (odds ratio 1.0), the odds ratio of developing T2DM was lowest with ARB or ACE inhibitor therapy (0.57 and 0.67, respectively), followed by CCB (0.75), placebo (0.77) and β-blocker therapy (0.90). This robust meta-analysis provides evidence that ARB and ACE-inhibitor therapy are the optimal classes of antihypertensive therapy to potentially avoid the development of T2DM.

Table 4
Results of major clinical trials that investigated the link between antihypertensive drug therapy and the development of type 2 diabetes
Table 5
Effects of the major classes of antihypertensive agents related to the development of diabetes
Table 6
Treatment recommendations based on the effects of antihypertensive agents on new-onset diabetes

THIAZIDE DIURETICS

Clinical Data

Even though there is an abundance of evidence supporting the beneficial effects of thiazide diuretics on cardiovascular outcomes, these agents may accelerate the onset of T2DM in patients with hypertension (particularly when used in high doses) [77, 8793], although older studies often had method limitations [93]. In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attacks Trial (ALLHAT) [70], the odds ratio of developing of developing T2DM at 2 years was significantly lower for lisinopril and amlodipine (0.55, P < .001 and 0.73, P = .006; respectively) than for chlorthalidone [94]. Although the odds ratios remained lower for lisinopril and amlodipine than for chlorthalidone at 4 and 6 years, these differences were no longer significant. A recent analysis of 3 large cohorts, participants in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) I, the NHS II, and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS), found that the multivariate relative risks of incident diabetes in participants using a thiazide diuretic compared with participants not using a thiazide diuretic were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.40) in older women, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.15–1.98) in younger women, and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.07–1.60) in men [78]. A meta-analysis of data from nearly 77,000 participants in major outcome trials found that patients receiving regimens including a thiazide diuretic and a β-blocker were at greater risk for developing diabetes than those receiving other regimens (risk ratio [RR] for alternative therapy, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77–0.86) [95]. It is important to note that even when low-dose diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg) are added to RAAS-blocking agents (losartan) in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome, normal renal function, and impaired glucose tolerance, there may be a worsening of glycemic control [96]. Despite these findings, the development of diabetes has not been associated with cardiovascular outcomes [90, 94]. The landmark Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial found that cardiovascular mortality did not increase in patients who developed diabetes or with preexisting diabetes who were treated with low-dose thiazide diuretics compared with placebo [90]. In addition, the ALLHAT trial also concluded that no direct evidence exists between diuretic-induced diabetes and clinical events [94].

Mechanisms

Thiazide diuretics worsen glycemic control in a dose-dependent fashion by decreasing insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity [77, 8789, 97]. Hypokalemia (and perhaps hypomagnesemia) may play an important role in thiazide-induced glucose intolerance [77, 9799], and deterioration in glucose metabolism occurs even with minimal decreases in serum potassium levels [90]. Patients receiving thiazide diuretics (and β-blockers) have significantly higher plasma fibrinogen levels and lower HDL levels than those receiving CCBs, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs [70, 100].

A potentially important benefit of thiazide diuretics is their antioxidant effects. In a study that analyzed the level of antioxidative protection afforded by the ferric-reducing ability of plasma, patients treated with thiazide diuretics had better protection, shown by higher ferric-reducing ability of plasma levels, than those treated with β-blockers or ACE inhibitors (P < .01) [101].

Place in Therapy

Thiazide diuretics have consistently shown an ability to prevent major cardiovascular events. However in ALLHAT, there was no significant difference between amlodipine and chlorthalidone (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90–1.07) or lisinopril and chlorthalidone (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91–1.08) in the primary end point, combined fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction [70]. Chlorthalidone was superior to amlodipine, the α-blocker doxazosin, and lisinopril in preventing various cardiovascular events, especially heart failure (amlodipine vs chlorthalidone, 10.2% vs 7.7%, respectively; and lisinopril vs chlorthalidone, 8.7% vs 7.7%, respectively) [70, 102]. Patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, who are especially likely to benefit from thiazide diuretic therapy, should be closely monitored for the development of diabetes [78].

Most patients require 2 or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve their BP goals [1]. Because older β-blockers, may lead to the development of diabetes, clinicians should be cautious in prescribing early combination therapy with these agents for patients at increased risk for T2DM [95]. Some researchers advocated early combination therapy with a thiazide diuretic and an ACE inhibitor or ARB because these newer agents may counteract some of the limitations of the thiazide diuretics [7981]. However, controlled outcome trials have not yet assessed these combinations [7].

β-BLOCKERS

Clinical Data

There is substantial evidence that first- and second-generation β-blockers accelerate the onset of T2DM in individuals with hypertension [88, 92, 93, 103105]. In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [105], patients administered a thiazide diuretic, CCB, or ACE inhibitor were at no greater risk for developing diabetes than their untreated counterparts, but the risk for developing T2DM was 28% greater in patients using a β-blocker than in those using no medication (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04–1.57). In the NHS I, NHS II, and HPFS cohorts, multivariate RRs of diabetes in participants using a β-blocker compared with those not using a β-blocker were 1.32 (95% CI, 1.20–1.46) in older women and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.05–1.38) in men [78].

Mechanisms

First- and second-generation β-blockers decrease insulin sensitivity, inhibit first-phase pancreatic insulin secretion (via β2-receptors), decrease peripheral glucose utilization, and decrease insulin clearance [92, 93, 97, 103, 104, 106,107]. They induce weight gain, decrease skeletal muscle blood flow, and may exert a detrimental effect on glycemic control by enhancing α2-receptor–mediated hepatic glucose output [82, 92, 93, 97, 103, 104, 106,107]. Older β-blockers also worsen lipid levels [106].

In contrast, third-generation agents, such as nebivolol and carvedilol, possess vasodilator actions through such proposed mechanisms as NO release, antioxidant effects, β2 agonism, and calcium blockade [108, 109]. These vasodilating agents have beneficial or neutral effects on insulin sensitivity and glycemic control [82, 109111]. Nebivolol, a highly selective β1 receptor blocker, has been shown to increase vascular NO production and reduce NADPH oxidase-mediated generation of ROS [112, 113].

Carvedilol, which is both a vasodilating β-blocker and an α-blocker, increases peripheral blood flow [82]. Third-generation β-blockers also have neutral or favorable effects on lipid parameters [106, 109,111]. Representative older and third-generation β-blockers have demonstrated antioxidant properties, including the ability to scavenge ROS, but third-generation agents have shown these effects more consistently [111, 113116].

Place in Therapy

Although they decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events, first- and second-generation β-blockers increase the risk for new-onset T2DM; subsequently, patients treated with older β-blockers should be monitored for the development of T2DM [78]. Clinical outcome data currently are not available, but the favorable metabolic effects of the third-generation β-blockers may eventually make them the antiadrenergic treatment of choice in patients with the CMS [7, 82].

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS

Clinical Data

Most experts assign the CCBs to an intermediate position between the thiazide diuretics and older β-blockers, which increase the incidence of new-onset diabetes, and the ACE inhibitors and ARBs, which decrease it [7]. Analysis of data from the NHS I, NHS II, and HPFS found no relation between the use of CCBs and risk for symptomatic diabetes in men or older women [78]. However, when asymptomatic cases of diabetes were included, CCBs were weakly associated with risk in older women (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.99–1.23) [78]. In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm, treatment with amlodipine with or without perindopril was associated with a 29% decrease in risk for new-onset T2DM compared with atenolol with or without bendroflumethiazide (Table 4) [63]. It is impossible to determine how much of this difference is attributable to beneficial effects of amlodipine and how much to the detrimental effects of atenolol.

Mechanisms

Twelve-week studies showed that nifedipine controlled-release and cilnidipine improved insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension [64, 117, 118]. This improvement may result from vasodilatory action in insulin-sensitive tissues without SNS stimulation [118], prevention of the inhibition of glucose transporters and glycogen synthase by calcium [7], or various antioxidant effects [7, 119]. Antioxidant effects include inhibition of Ang II- and aldosterone-induced superoxide formation [120, 121], improvement in NO bioavailability [120, 121], and reduction of oxidative stress [122, 123]. CCBs have minimal effects on lipid levels [117, 118, 124,125].

Place in Therapy

The CCBs are attractive candidates for use in combination regimens because they improve insulin sensitivity, have a neutral effect on lipid parameters, and have antioxidant effects. They may be especially beneficial when administered with an RAAS inhibitor, which offers more complete and robust metabolic protection.

α-ADRENERGIC BLOCKERS

Clinical Data

Large outcome trials have not determined the effect of α-adrenergic blockers (α-blockers), such as prazosin, doxazosin, and terazosin, on new-onset T2DM. In 2000, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute discontinued the doxazosin arm in the BP component of ALLHAT after a median follow-up of 3.3 years because there was a 25% greater risk for combined CVD outcomes in the doxazosin group compared with the chlorthalidone group [102]. In a randomized, double-blind study of male veterans with hypertension, patients receiving prazosin were more likely to report adverse events and subsequently withdraw from the study than those treated with hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, diltiazem, or captopril [126]. Commonly reported adverse events with α-blockers include fatigue, sleepiness, nonpostural dizziness, headache, arthralgia, and skin disorders [126, 127].

Despite these concerns, selected patients may benefit from combination regimens that include an α-blocker. In a 16-week study, 35% of 264 patients with impaired glucose metabolism and a history of treatment resistance achieved adequate BP control when doxazosin was added to their regimen [83]. One patient discontinued prematurely due to peripheral edema, but adjunctive doxazosin was generally well tolerated [83].

Mechanisms

α-Blockers increase insulin sensitivity [83, 128]. These agents improve glucose utilization by decreasing sympathetic stimulation [129] and blunt hyperinsulinemia after glucose administration [130]. In addition, α-blockers improve lipid parameters, increasing HDL cholesterol and decreasing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and very-LDL levels [83, 127130]. α-Blockers may have a particularly potent effect on hypertriglyceridemia [127, 131]. Doxazosin inhibits oxidative stress-related proteins [132].

Place in Therapy

Even in patients with the CMS, α-blockers are rarely used as first-line therapy because of safety concerns [7]. However, because of their favorable effects on glycemic and lipid parameters, α-blockers may be beneficial as adjunctive therapy in carefully selected patients [83].

RAAS BLOCKADE

Introduction

The RAAS cascade has several different points at which ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and renin inhibitors can block the formation of Ang II and its subsequent effects (Figure 8). ACE inhibitors limit the conversion of Ang I to Ang II and increase circulating levels of bradykinin, which contributes to local NO generation [133]. ARBs competitively inhibit the binding of Ang II to the AT1 receptor [134]. Renin inhibitors, a new class of recently introduced drugs, block the first and rate-limiting step of the RAAS cascade, the conversion of angiotensinogen to Ang I, by binding tightly to the S1/S3 pocket of renin and the hydrophobic subpocket S3sp (Figure 9) [135, 136]. Results from several large outcome trials conducted with ACE inhibitors or ARBs (Table 4) suggest that RAAS inhibition may be the most effective strategy for preventing or delaying T2DM in patients with hypertension [7].

Figure 8
The RAAS cascade.
Figure 9
Renin inhibitor–binding pockets on the active site of renin [135, 136].

ACE INHIBITORS

Clinical Data

Clinical outcome trials showed that ACE-inhibitor–based regimens were more likely to decrease incident T2DM than regimens involving placebo [65, 66], thiazide diuretics [67], β-blockers [67, 68,70], or CCBs [68, 70] (Table 4). For example, in the recently reported African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension [68], the RR for developing diabetes was significantly lower in patients randomly assigned to ramipril compared with metoprolol (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36–0.78; P = .001) or amlodipine (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31–0.79; P = .003).

A meta-analysis of 7 large randomized controlled clinical trials found a 27% overall decrease in risk for new-onset diabetes with ACE-inhibitor–based regimens (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63–0.84) [137]. Another meta-analysis of 6 trials found a similar risk reduction with ACE-inhibitor–based therapy (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71–0.89) [138]. The Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial demonstrated that rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist, significantly prevented or delayed the onset of T2DM in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose [139]. The ACE-inhibitor ramipril did not significantly decrease the incidence of T2DM or death, but significantly increased regression to normoglycemia at 3 years [140]. It would be interesting to see whether there are synergistic effects of using ramipril and rosiglitazone in combination.

Mechanisms

ACE inhibitors improve insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization through multiple mechanisms. They reduce adipocyte size, which may increase the number of small insulin-sensitive adipocytes [27]. They may increase the percentage of type I fibers in skeletal muscle [141]. They enhance skeletal muscle blood flow, improving insulin delivery and enhancing glucose uptake and metabolism in insulin-sensitive tissues [25, 142, 143].They also improve insulin-mediated glucose uptake by reducing the degradation of bradykinin and increasing the production of NO through their blockade of kininase II and ACE [133, 144]. They enhance vascular sensitivity to insulin and improve endothelial function [145, 146]. ACE inhibitors may prevent or reduce Ang II–mediated interference with insulin-signaling pathways, evidenced by increased glucose transporter-4 protein content in skeletal muscle [147]. They may improve lipid levels by improving carbohydrate metabolism [125]. Their antioxidant effects include suppression of Ang II–induced superoxide formation [120, 121] and reduction in oxidative stress [148, 149]. ACE inhibitors have several pancreatic benefits. They preferentially increase islet blood flow in the endocrine pancreas [45, 150] and protect β cells from functional damage caused by prolonged exposure to high glucose levels, at least in part by decreasing oxidative stress [151]. Moreover, a study in Zucker diabetic fatty rats showed that perindopril attenuated disordered islet structure, diminished islet fibrogenesis, and improved first-phase insulin secretion [49].

Place in Therapy

Because large outcomes trials showed that ACE inhibitors decreased the incidence of T2DM in patients with hypertension, clinicians should consider an ACE inhibitor as the primary treatment for patients with hypertension and other evidence of the CMS, especially when impaired glucose tolerance is present [84]. A limitation of this class is the adverse effect profile, which includes cough, syncope, and, rarely, angioedema [69]. In selecting an antihypertensive agent for a patient, clinicians should weigh the demonstrated effectiveness of ACE inhibitors against the safety and tolerability profile.

ANG II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS

Clinical Data

In major outcome trials, the rate of new-onset T2DM was consistently lower with ARBs than with other treatments, including placebo [7072], hydrochlorothiazide [73], atenolol [74], and amlodipine [75, 76]. Two challenges in interpreting the results of many outcomes trials are that patients often received combination therapy and the comparator may be an agent (eg, β-blocker) that is diabetogenic [84]. Therefore, results of a recent subanalysis of the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial [76] are of particular interest. In the monotherapy subset of the VALUE trial, there was a greater incidence of new-onset T2DM in the amlodipine group (9.9%) than in the valsartan group (7.8%; RR, 0.772; P = .012) [76].

A meta-analysis of 3 randomized double-blind trials that included a total of 29,375 patients with hypertension found that ARB treatment decreased the incidence of diabetes (relative risk reduction, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74–0.86; P < .0000001), although there was a slight increase in risk for myocardial infarction (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01–1.26; P = .041) [152]. A meta-analysis of 5 ARB studies that focused on only new-onset T2DM found a similar decrease in risk for T2DM (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.82) [138]. Thus, currently available data suggest that ARBs and ACE inhibitors have similarly beneficial effects in preventing T2DM [138].

Mechanisms

ARBs improve insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization by means of multiple mechanisms, some of which are common to ACE inhibitors. They increase the number of small insulin-sensitive adipocytes [27]. They may increase the percentage of type I skeletal muscle fibers [141], enhance skeletal muscle blood flow [153, 154], and improve skeletal muscle glucose uptake [21]. Losartan increases serum levels of free insulin-like growth-factor I, which may decrease IR [155].

Telmisartan and irbesartan also improve insulin sensitivity by inducing PPAR-γ activity, an action independent of AT1 receptor–blocking properties [156160]. PPAR-γ activation may mediate the induction and prevent the depletion of adiponectin, an adipose-specific protein that enhances insulin sensitivity [161]. Telmisartan and olmesartan decrease triglyceride levels in rats [159, 162]. However, a similar effect was not observed in human volunteers with IR [160].

ARBs have shown various antioxidant effects. They suppress superoxide production in skeletal muscle [21, 163]. Losartan may decrease oxidative stress and improve endothelial function in rats with salt-induced hypertension [164] and healthy human volunteers with free fatty acid-induced acute endothelial dysfunction [146]. ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, have beneficial effects on the pancreas, preferentially enhancing islet blood flow in rats [150] and improving β-cell function in subjects with IR and abdominal adiposity [160]. In Zucker-diabetic-fatty rats, irbesartan, like perindopril, decreased islet cell ECM fibrosis and oxidative stress and increased β-cell mass, possibly by decreasing oxidative stress and apoptosis and attenuating profibrotic pathways [49]. In addition, in the transgenic Ren2 model of hypertension and IR, an ARB (valsartan) exhibited a significant increase in insulin-mediated glucose uptake compared with untreated animals (P < .05), which indicates that oxidative stress plays an important role in Ang II–mediated IR [21].

Place in Therapy

Large outcome trials showed that ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, decreased the incidence of T2DM in patients with hypertension. Therefore, ARB therapy is appropriate first-line therapy for patients with the CMS, especially when impaired glucose tolerance is present [84]. Ongoing outcome trials, including the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research study [7], the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial [165, 166], and the Telmisartan Randomised Assessment Study in ACE-inhibitor Intolerant Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease [165, 166], will provide additional information on the effects of ARBs on new-onset T2DM and also may identify some differences in efficacy between ARBs and ACE inhibitors. For the present, the better tolerability of the ARBs might influence the choice of initial therapy. Overall, the ARBs offer excellent safety and tolerability, with an adverse-event profile similar to that of placebo [134]. Commonly reported adverse events in outcome trials were headache, edema, angina, and diarrhea [76]. Less frequently reported events were syncope, hyperkalemia (and rarely, hypokalemia), increased serum creatinine levels, and angioedema [71, 72, 76, 167].

Aldosterone Mineralocorticoid Antagonists

Clinical Data

Spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist that has been available for decades, and eplerenone, a selective aldosterone-receptor antagonist more recently introduced, are available for use in the treatment of congestive heart failure [168, 169] and resistant hypertension. Mineralocorticoid blockade has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing total mortality as well as hospitalization for heart failure in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic heart failure and in patients with congestive heart failure following acute myocardial infarction [170, 171]. Sodium retention and volume expansion mediated in part by aldosterone excess are prominent features in low-renin hypertension and the use of these agents in hypertensive diabetic patients, as well as those with resistant hypertension, are emerging [172]. In a recent study, eplerenone was demonstrated to be more effective than losartan in reducing BP in patients with low-renin hypertension typical of T2DM [173].

Mechanisms

The mechanism of action of aldosterone antagonists have been well defined over the years in regards to the myocardium, congestive heart failure and hypertension [168172], and recently there has been increased interest regarding its effect in the CMS [174, 175]. Our laboratory has recently found evidence to support a positive role for the attenuation of NAD(P)H oxidase production of oxidative stress in the myocardium and cardiac remodeling utilizing mineralocorticoid receptor blockade with low-dose spironolactone in the Ren2 model of hypertension, oxidative stress, and IR [176]. Further, our current studies demonstrate abrogation of many islet and pancreatic structural and functional changes in the Ren2 model [50].

Place in Therapy

Aldosterone antagonists should be considered in combination therapeutic management as a second-or third-line choice for RAAS blockade in the treatment of hypertension in patients with T2DM, especially if the current control of BP guidelines is not being attained with therapeutic regimens discussed previously.

DIRECT RENIN INHIBITORS

Introduction

The therapeutic potential of renin inhibition has been investigated for many years, but a new class of orally active, nonpeptide, low-molecular–weight renin inhibitors has been developed [135, 177]. Direct renin inhibitors block the RAAS at its initial point of activation. Aliskiren, first in this new class of antihypertensive drugs, was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with hypertension as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives.

Clinical Data

Safety and efficacy of aliskiren has been demonstrated in phases II and III clinical trials. Once-daily treatment with aliskiren for 4 or 8 weeks has been shown to effectively decrease BP in patients with hypertension [178182]. Additionally, dose-dependent decreases in BP were demonstrated during an 8-week treatment period of aliskiren monotherapy at 150, 300, and 600 mg, compared with placebo, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension [179]. Furthermore, studies of combination treatment with aliskiren and amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, or valsartan were recently published and demonstrated additional lowering of both systolic and diastolic BP with placebo-like adverse effect profiles in patients with hypertension [183185]. Reductions in BP have also been demonstrated with aliskiren monotherapy or aliskiren and ramipril in patients with hypertension and type 1 diabetes or T2DM [186]. Aliskiren showed a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of placebo [179, 182], irbesartan [182], and losartan [181]. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, dizziness, fatigue or weakness, and gastrointestinal disorders [179, 181, 182].

Mechanisms

In vitro studies showed that aliskiren is a potent, tight-binding, specific inhibitor of human renin [187]. Oral administration to sodium-depleted marmosets caused complete inhibition of plasma renin activity and sustained decreases in arterial BP [136, 187, 188]. Oral administration to healthy volunteers induced a dose-dependent decrease in plasma renin activity, blocked the formation of Ang I and II, and decreased plasma and urinary aldosterone levels at doses of 80 mg or greater [85].

The mechanism of action of renin inhibitors differs from those of other RAAS inhibitors in several important ways. Renin inhibitors prevent the formation of both Ang I and II, whereas ACE inhibitors increase Ang I [85] and ARBs increase Ang II [177]. In addition, direct renin inhibitors prevent the reactive increase in plasma renin activity seen with other RAAS blockers [178, 186]. Because renin inhibitors do not increase Ang II levels, they are likely to have more beneficial effects on prothrombotic plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels than ARBs [85, 189]. Unlike ACE inhibitors, renin inhibitors do not affect bradykinin metabolism and thus would not be expected to cause the cough or angioedema seen with those agents [134, 136, 190]. Despite similar decreases in BP, renin inhibition caused a 50% greater increase in renal perfusion than ACE inhibition, suggesting that renin inhibitors may produce a more effective blockade of tissue Ang II formation than ACE inhibitors [191]. Additionally, renin inhibitors could be useful in clinical situations, such as congestive heart failure, for which ACE escape may be a problem.

Place in Therapy

The therapeutic potential of renin inhibitors in preventing or delaying the onset of T2DM is currently unknown. However, given the success of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in reducing new-onset T2DM, it is possible that renin inhibitors will also provide such benefits [182]. Today, many researchers advocate the coadministration of ACE inhibitors and ARBs to intensify RAAS control, but eventually the combination of an ARB and a renin inhibitor may be shown to have similar effectiveness with better tolerability [85]. In fact, 1 study has shown that aliskiren in combination with the ACE-inhibitor ramipril reduced BP in patients with diabetes and hypertension [186]. Additionally, the Aliskiren in the Evaluation of Proteinuria in Diabetes (AVOID) trial was designed to determine the effects of combination therapy with aliskiren and the ARB, losartan, on proteinuria in patients with diabetes and results are anticipated in the near future. Also forthcoming is the Aspire Higher clinical development program, which will include a number trials that will evaluate surrogate markers and clinical outcomes in patients with disorders including hypertension, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart failure, and who are treated with aliskiren as monotherapy or combination therapy.

OPTIMIZING OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION

Clinicians can optimize outcomes in their patients by helping them make necessary lifestyle modifications, adopting a treatment plan focused on achieving current BP goals, and practicing appropriate BP monitoring. They can also implement a global risk-reduction strategy and adopt approaches that encourage patient adherence to the treatment plan. According to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7), BP goals are less than 140/90 mm Hg for the overall population and less than 130/80 mm Hg for persons with hypertension accompanied by diabetes or renal disease [1].

NONPHARMACOLOGIC RECOMMENDATIONS

The JNC 7 emphasizes the need to adopt a healthy lifestyle to help treat hypertension (Table 7) [1]. A recent follow-up to the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study reported that after a median of 3 years, T2DM incidence per 100 person-years was 4.6 in patients who had received active lifestyle counseling and 7.2 in controls (P = .04) [192].Thus, counseling was associated with a 36% RR reduction [192]. Whether the choice of antihypertensive agents has a significant effect on metabolic risk factors or progression to T2DM in patients who adopt lifestyle modifications is currently unknown [7].

Table 7
Lifestyle modifications for managing hypertension recommended in the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (The JNC 7 Report) [1]*

GLOBAL CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK REDUCTION

To delay or prevent T2DM, an aggressive multifaceted treatment approach for patients with hypertension should be adopted. The RAAS acronym was developed to summarize a program for achieving global risk reduction in patients with the CMS, atherosclerosis, and T2DM, but many of its components are also important for diabetes prevention in patients with hypertension (Table 8) [4, 193].

Table 8
A treatment strategy for global risk reduction in patients with hypertension: the RAAS acronym [4, 193]

The Hypertension Writing Group recently shared with the clinical community a new definition of hypertension that alludes to global cardiometabolic risk: "Hypertension is a progressive cardiovascular syndrome arising from complex and interrelated etiologies. Early markers of the syndrome are often present before BP elevation is observed; therefore, hypertension cannot be classified solely by discrete BP thresholds. Progression is strongly associated with functional and structural cardiac and vascular abnormalities that damage the heart, kidneys, brain, vasculature, and other organs and lead to premature morbidity and death." “Other organs,” as can be ascertained from this review article, certainly include the pancreas in relation to the development of T2DM. This review discusses the multiple metabolic functional changes, as well as structural changes, within the pancreatic islet that contribute to the development of T2DM.

Patient compliance with antihypertensive medication is approximately 64%, and adherence to exercise programs is only about 50% [194]. Table 9 lists approaches that may assist clinicians to increase adherence to a global risk reduction program [4, 194].

Table 9
Strategies for increasing patient adherence to a global risk reduction plan for preventing diabetes [4, 194]

CONCLUSION

Persons with hypertension have an increased risk for developing T2DM due to IR, compensatory hyperinsulinemia-hyperamylinemia, and related metabolic abnormalities. The formation and deposition of amylin-derived islet amyloid in the pancreas can diminish islet β-cell function and cause β-cell loss by apoptosis, compounding the risk for T2DM.

The various classes of antihypertensive drugs have different metabolic and structural effects that can impact on the development of T2DM. One must not overlook the clear cardiovascular benefits of low-doses of thiazide diuretics, however, high doses of thiazides may lead to the development of T2DM. First- and second-generation β-blockers promote diabetes, whereas newer vasodilating β-blockers may have more neutral, benign, or protective effects. CCBs decrease incident diabetes in patients with CMS and have intermediate effectiveness between the thiazide diuretics and older β-blockers compared with the RAAS inhibitors. α-Adrenergic blockers offer important metabolic benefits, but a problematic adverse effect profile prevents first-line use in most patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that overcoming IR with agents that interrupt the RAAS, including ACE inhibitors and ARBs, may prevent or delay the development of diabetes. In addition, these are the only agents known to attenuate the pancreatic damage caused by islet fibrosis and may be capable of slowing the progression of islet amyloid deposition by reducing islet oxidative stress, which accelerates polymerization of amylin monomers necessary for the formation of mature amylin-derived islet amyloid fibrils. Renin inhibitors, a new class of drugs introduced into clinical practice, exert their effects at a point upstream from ACE inhibitors and ARBs. This characteristic suggests that when clinical outcome trials are conducted, renin inhibitors may have the potential to also delay the onset of T2DM. In addition to determining the best pharmacologic regimen for their patients with hypertension who may be at risk for developing T2DM, clinicians should help patients make beneficial lifestyle modifications, as well as incorporate a global risk reduction strategy into their practice.

Grant acknowledgement

This research was supported by NIH (RO1 HL73101-01A1), an investigator-initiated grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and the Veterans Affairs Merit System (0018) for James R. Sowers.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572. [PubMed]
2. Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Randall BL, Neaton JD, Brancati FL, Ford CE, et al. Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:13–18. [PubMed]
3. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:434–444. [PubMed]
4. Hayden MR, Sowers JR. Hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin. 2006;1:22–37.
5. Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1597–H1602. [PubMed]
6. Hayden MR, Tyagi SC. Islet redox stress: the manifold toxicities of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and amylin derived islet amyloid in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pancreas. 2002;3:86–108. [PubMed]
7. Stump CS, Hamilton MT, Sowers JR. Effect of antihypertensive agents on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:796–806. [PubMed]
8. Aksnes TA, Kjeldsen SE, Mancia G. The effect of antihypertensive agents on new-onset diabetes mellitus: time to amend the guidelines? Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6:139–147. [PubMed]
9. Abdeen MB, Chowdhury NA, Hayden MR, Ibdah JA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and the cardiometabolic syndrome. J CardioMetabolic Syndr. 2006;1:36–40. [PubMed]
10. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. [PubMed]
11. Whaley-Connell A, Sowers JR. Chronic kidney disease and the cardiometabolic syndrome. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006;8:546–548. [PubMed]
12. Reaven GM, Lithell H, Landsberg L. Hypertension and associated metabolic abnormalities—the role of insulin resistance and the sympathoadrenal system. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:374–381. [PubMed]
13. McFarlane SI, Banerji M, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:713–718. [PubMed]
14. Denker PS, Pollock VE. Fasting serum insulin levels in essential hypertension. A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1649–1651. [PubMed]
15. Grunfeld B, Balzareti M, Romo M, Gimenez M, Gutman R. Hyperinsulinemia in normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents. Hypertension. 1994;23:I12–I15. [PubMed]
16. Cheng ZJ, Vaskonen T, Tikkanen I, Nurminen K, Ruskoaho H, Vapaatalo H, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and salt-sensitive hypertension in spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Hypertension. 2001;37:433–439. [PubMed]
17. Standley PR, Rose KA, Sowers JR. Increased basal arterial smooth muscle glucose transport in the Zucker rat. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:48–52. [PubMed]
18. Roche HM, Phillips C, Gibney MJ. The metabolic syndrome: the crossroads of diet and genetics. Proc Nutr Soc. 2005;64:371–377. [PubMed]
19. Groop L. Genetics of the metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr. 2000;83:S39–S48. [PubMed]
20. Dandona P, Aljada A, Dhindsa S, Garg R. Insulin as an anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic hormone. Clin Cornerstone. 2003 Suppl 4:S13–S20. [PubMed]
21. Blendea MC, Jacobs D, Stump CS, McFarlane SI, Ogrin C, Bahtyiar G, et al. Abrogation of oxidative stress improves insulin sensitivity in the Ren-2 rat model of tissue angiotensin II overexpression. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;288:E353–E359. [PubMed]
22. Lavoie JL, Bianco RA, Sakai K, Keen HL, Ryan MJ, Sigmund CD. Transgenic mice for studies of the renin-angiotensin system in hypertension. Acta Physiol Scand. 2004;181:571–577. [PubMed]
23. Nickenig G, Roling J, Strehlow K, Schnabel P, Bohm M. Insulin induces upregulation of vascular AT1 receptor gene expression by posttranscriptional mechanisms. Circulation. 1998;98:2453–2460. [PubMed]
24. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Hendler R, Felig P, Wahren J. Regulation of splanchnic and peripheral glucose uptake by insulin and hyperglycemia in man. Diabetes. 1983;32:35–45. [PubMed]
25. McFarlane SI, Kumar A, Sowers JR. Mechanisms by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:30H–37H. [PubMed]
26. Strazzullo P, Galletti F. Impact of the renin-angiotensin system on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004;13:325–332. [PubMed]
27. Furuhashi M, Ura N, Takizawa H, Yoshida D, Moniwa N, Murakami H, et al. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system decreases adipocyte size with improvement in insulin sensitivity. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1977–1982. [PubMed]
28. Ailhaud G, Fukamizu A, Massiera F, Negrel R, Saint-Marc P, Teboul M. Angiotensinogen, angiotensin II and adipose tissue development. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24 Suppl 4:S33–S35. [PubMed]
29. Janke J, Engeli S, Gorzelniak K, Luft FC, Sharma AM. Mature adipocytes inhibit in vitro differentiation of human preadipocytes via angiotensin type 1 receptors. Diabetes. 2002;51:1699–1707. [PubMed]
30. Ritov VB, Menshikova EV, He J, Ferrell RE, Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE. Deficiency of subsarcolemmal mitochondria in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:8–14. [PubMed]
31. Wu D-A, Bu X, Warden CH, Shen DDC, Jeng C-Y, Sheu WHH, et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping of human blood pressure to a genetic region at or near the lipoprotein lipase gene locus on chromosome 8p22. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2111–2118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Liu E, Kitajima S, Higaki Y, Morimoto M, Sun H, Watanabe T, et al. High lipoprotein lipase activity increases insulin sensitivity in transgenic rabbits. Metabolism. 2005;54:132–138. [PubMed]
33. Bey L, Areiqat E, Sano A, Hamilton MT. Reduced lipoprotein lipase activity in postural skeletal muscle during aging. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:687–692. [PubMed]
34. Hamilton MT, Etienne J, McClure WC, Pavey BS, Holloway AK. Role of local contractile activity and muscle fiber type on LPL regulation during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metabol. 1998;275:E1016–E1022. [PubMed]
35. Bey L, Hamilton MT. Suppression of skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity during physical inactivity: a molecular reason to maintain daily low-intensity activity. J Physiol Lond. 2003;551:673–682. [PubMed]
36. The DECODE Study Group, on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases? Diabetes Care. 2003;26:688–696. [PubMed]
37. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Hypertension, insulin, and proinsulin in participants with impaired glucose tolerance. Hypertension. 2002;40:679–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Hayden MR, Whaley-Connell A, Chowdhury N, Sowers JR. Role of angiotensin II in diabetic cardiovascular and renal disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;13:135–140.
39. Hayden MR, Stump CS, Sowers JR. Introduction: organ involvement in the cardiometabolic syndrome. J CardioMetabolic Syndr. 2006;1:16–24. [PubMed]
40. Poitout V, Robertson RP. Minireview: secondary β-cell failure in type 2 diabetes—a convergence of glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity. Endocrinology. 2002;143:339–342. [PubMed]
41. Leung PS, Carlsson PO. Tissue renin-angiotensin system: its expression, localization, regulation and potential role in the pancreas. J Mol Endocrinol. 2001;26:155–164. [PubMed]
42. Leung PS, Chappell MC. A local pancreatic renin-angiotensin system: endocrine and exocrine roles. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;35:838–846. [PubMed]
43. Lau T, Carlsson P-O, Leung PS. Evidence for a local angiotensin-generating system and dose-dependent inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin release by angiotensin II in isolated pancreatic islets. Diabetologia. 2004;47:240–248. [PubMed]
44. Carlsson P-O. The renin-angiotensin system in the endocrine pancreas. J Pancreas. 2001;2:26–32. [PubMed]
45. Carlsson P-O, Berne C, Jansson L. Angiotensin II and the endocrine pancreas: effects on islet blood flow and insulin secretion in rats. Diabetologia. 1998;41:127–133. [PubMed]
46. Fliser D, Schaefer F, Schmid D, Veldhuis JD, Ritz E. Angiotensin II affects basal, pulsatile, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in humans. Hypertension. 1997;30:1156–1161. [PubMed]
47. Zhao H-L, Lai FMM, Tong PC, Zhong D-R, Yang D, Tomlinson B, et al. Prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics of islet amyloid in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52:2759–2766. [PubMed]
48. Hayden MR. Islet amyloid and fibrosis in the cardiometabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J CardioMetabolic Syndr. 2007;2:70–75. [PubMed]
49. Tikellis C, Wookey PJ, Candido R, Andrikopoulos S, Thomas MC, Cooper ME. Improved islet morphology after blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in the ZDF rat. Diabetes. 2004;53:989–997. [PubMed]
50. Hayden MR, Karuparthi PR, Habibi J, Wasekar C, Lastra G, Manrique C, et al. Ultrastructural islet study of early fibrosis in the Ren2 rat model of hypertension. Emerging role of the islet pancreatic pericyte-stellate cell. J Pancreas. 2007;8:725–738. [PubMed]
51. Hayden MR, Karuparthi PR, Manrique CM, Lastra G, Habibi J, Sowers JR. Longitudinal ultrastructure study of islet amyloid in the HIP rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Biol Med. 2007;232:772–779. [PubMed]
52. Hayden MR, Sowers JR. Redox imbalance in diabetes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:865–867. [PubMed]
53. Hayden MR, Sowers JR. Isletopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications of islet RAS, islet fibrosis, islet amyloid, remodeling, and oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:891–910. [PubMed]
54. Hayden MR, Tyagi SC. "A" is for amylin and amyloid in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pancreas. 2001;2:124–139. [PubMed]
55. Hayden MR, Tyagi SC, Kerklo MM, Nicolls MR. Type 2 diabetes mellitus as a conformational disease. J Pancreas. 2005;6:287–302. [PubMed]
56. Cooper GJS, Willis AC, Clark A, Turner RC, Sim RB, Reid KBM. Purification and characterization of a peptide from amyloid-rich pancreases of type 2 diabetic patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:8628–8632. [PubMed]
57. Reda TK, Geliebter A, Pi-Sunyer FX. Amylin, food intake, and obesity. Obes Res. 2002;10:1087–1091. [PubMed]
58. Lutz TA, Althaus J, Rossi R, Scharrer E. Anorectic effect of amylin is not transmitted by capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibers. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1998;274:R1777–R1782. [PubMed]
59. Wookey PJ, Tikellis C, Du H-C, Qin H-F, Sexton PM, Cooper ME. Amylin binding in rat renal cortex, stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and activation of plasma renin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1996;270:F289–F294. [PubMed]
60. Cooper ME, McNally PG, Phillips PA, Johnston CI. Amylin stimulates plasma renin concentration in humans. Hypertension. 1995;26:460–464. [PubMed]
61. Butler AE, Janson J, Soeller WC, Butler PC. Increased β-cell apoptosis prevents adaptive increase in β-cell mass in mouse model of type 2 diabetes: evidence for role of islet amyloid formation rather than direct action of amyloid. Diabetes. 2003;52:2304–2314. [PubMed]
62. Kailasam MT, Parmer RJ, Tyrell EA, Henry RR, O'Connor DT. Circulating amylin in human essential hypertension: heritability and early increase in individuals at genetic risk. J Hypertens. 2000;18:1611–1620. [PubMed]
63. Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895–906. [PubMed]
64. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Marks RG, Kowey P, Messerli FH, et al. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2805–2816. [PubMed]
65. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G, et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–153. [PubMed]
66. Vermes E, Ducharme A, Bourassa MG, Lessard M, White M, Tardif J-C. Enalapril reduces the incidence of diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure: insight from the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Circulation. 2003;107:1291–1296. [PubMed]
67. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, Lanke J, Hedner T, Niklason A, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:611–616. [PubMed]
68. Thornley-Brown D, Wang X, Wright JT, Jr, Randall OS, Miller ER, Lash JP, et al. Differing effects of antihypertensive drugs on the incidence of diabetes mellitus among patients with hypertensive kidney disease. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:797–805. [PubMed]
69. The PEACE Trial Investigators. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2058–2068. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997. [PubMed]
71. Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJV, Michelson EL, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet. 2003;362:759–766. [PubMed]
72. Yusuf S, Ostergren JB, Gerstein HC, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al. Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 2005;112:48–53. [PubMed]
73. Lindholm LH, Persson M, Alaupovic P, Carlberg B, Svensson A, Samuelsson O. Metabolic outcome during 1 year in newly detected hypertensives: results of the Antihypertensive Treatment and Lipid Profile in a North of Sweden Efficacy Evaluation (ALPINE study) J Hypertens. 2003;21:1563–1574. [PubMed]
74. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Borch-Johnsen K, Olsen MH, Wachtell K, Dahlof B, et al. Risk of new-onset diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study. J Hypertens. 2002;20:1879–1886. [PubMed]
75. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, Brunner HR, Ekman S, Hansson L, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:2022–2031. [PubMed]
76. Julius S, Weber MA, Kjeldsen SE, McInnes GT, Zanchetti A, Brunner HR, et al. The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial: outcomes in patients receiving monotherapy. Hypertension. 2006;48:385–391. [PubMed]
77. Harper R, Ennis CN, Sheridan B, Atkinson AB, Johnston GD, Bell PM. Effects of low dose versus conventional dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in essential hypertension. BMJ. 1994;309:226–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Taylor EN, Hu FB, Curhan GC. Antihypertensive medications and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1065–1070. [PubMed]
79. Kjeldsen SE, Os I, Hoieggen A, Beckey K, Gleim GW, Oparil S. Fixed-dose combinations in the management of hypertension: defining the place of angiotensin receptor antagonists and hydrochlorothiazide. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5:17–22. [PubMed]
80. Mimran A, Weir MR. Angiotensin-receptor blockers and diuretics—advantages of combination. Blood Press. 2005;14:6–11. [PubMed]
81. Mogensen CE. New concepts in blood pressure-lowering management in diabetic patients: the case for early ACE inhibitor combination therapy with diuretics. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19:S15–S20. [PubMed]
82. Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and the spectrum of glycaemic control. QJM. 2006;99:431–436. [PubMed]
83. Pessina AC, Ciccariello L, Perrone F, Stoico V, Gussoni G, Scotti A, et al. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of alpha-blocker doxazosin as add-on therapy in patients with hypertension and impaired glucose metabolism. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16:137–147. [PubMed]
84. Weber MA. Hypertension, the metabolic syndrome, and the risk of developing diabetes: is it time to change the guidelines? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2004;6:425–427. 460. [PubMed]
85. Nussberger J, Wuerzner G, Jensen C, Brunner HR. Angiotensin II suppression in humans by the orally active renin inhibitor Aliskiren (SPP100): comparison with enalapril. Hypertension. 2002;39:e1–e8. [PubMed]
86. Elliott WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369:201–207. [PubMed]
87. Perez-Stable E, Caralis PV. Thiazide-induced disturbances in carbohydrate, lipid, and potassium metabolism. Am Heart J. 1983;106:245–251. [PubMed]
88. Lithell HO. Effect of antihypertensive drugs on insulin, glucose, and lipid metabolism. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:203–209. [PubMed]
89. Fletcher A, Amery A, Birkenhager W, Bulpitt C, Clement D, De Leeuw P, et al. Risks and benefits in the trial of the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly. J Hypertens. 1991;9:225–230. [PubMed]
90. Savage PJ, Pressel SL, Curb JD, Schron EB, Applegate WB, Black HR, et al. Influence of long-term, low-dose, diuretic-based, antihypertensive therapy on glucose, lipid, uric acid, and potassium levels in older men and women with isolated systolic hypertension: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:741–751. [PubMed]
91. Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, Borgioni C, Gattobigio R, Filippucci L, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 2004;43:963–969. [PubMed]
92. Samuelsson O, Hedner T, Berglund G, Persson B, Andersson OK, Wilhelmsen L. Diabetes mellitus in treated hypertension: incidence, predictive factors and the impact of non-selective beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics during 15 years treatment of middleaged hypertensive men in the Primary Prevention Trial Goteborg, Sweden. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:257–263. [PubMed]
93. Sowers JR, Bakris GL. Antihypertensive therapy and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:969–970. [PubMed]
94. Barzilay JI, Davis BR, Cutler JA, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, Basile J, et al. Fasting glucose levels and incident diabetes mellitus in older nondiabetic adults randomized to receive 3 different classes of antihypertensive treatment: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2191–2201. [PubMed]
95. Mason JM, Dickinson HO, Nicolson DJ, Campbell F, Ford GA, Williams B. The diabetogenic potential of thiazide-type diuretic and beta-blocker combinations in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2005;23:1777–1781. [PubMed]
96. Bakris G, Molitch M, Hewkin A, Kipnes M, Sarafidis P, Fakouhi K, et al. Differences in glucose tolerance between fixed-dose antihypertensive drug combinations in people with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2592–2597. [PubMed]
97. Padwal R, Laupacis A. Antihypertensive therapy and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:247–255. [PubMed]
98. Gorden P, Sherman BM, Simopoulos AP. Glucose intolerance with hypokalemia: an increased proportion of circulating proinsulin-like component. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;34:235–240. [PubMed]
99. Helderman JH, Elahi D, Andersen DK, Raizes GS, Tobin JD, Shocken D, et al. Prevention of the glucose intolerance of thiazide diuretics by maintenance of body potassium. Diabetes. 1983;32:106–111. [PubMed]
100. Papadakis JA, Mikhailidis DP, Vrentzos GE, Kalikaki A, Kazakou I, Ganotakis ES. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on plasma fibrinogen and serum HDL levels in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2005;11:139–146. [PubMed]
101. Skalska A, Gasowski J, Stepniewski M, Grodzicki T. Antioxidative protection in hypertensive patients treated with diuretics. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:1130–1132. [PubMed]
102. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT) JAMA. 2000;283:1967–1975. [PubMed]
103. Pollare T, Lithell H, Selinus I, Berne C. Sensitivity to insulin during treatment with atenolol and metoprolol: a randomised, double blind study of effects on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in hypertensive patients. BMJ. 1989;298:1152–1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
104. Lithell H, Pollare T, Vessby B. Metabolic effects of pindolol and propranolol in a double-blind cross-over study in hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 1992;1:92–101. [PubMed]
105. Gress TW, Nieto FJ, Shahar E, Wofford MR, Brancati FL. Atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Hypertension and antihypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:905–912. [PubMed]
106. Jacob S, Rett K, Henriksen EJ. Antihypertensive therapy and insulin sensitivity: do we have to redefine the role of β-blocking agents? Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:1258–1265. [PubMed]
107. Wright AD, Barber SG, Kendall MJ, Poole PH. Beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs and blood sugar control in diabetes mellitus. BMJ. 1979;1:159–161. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
108. Toda N. Vasodilating β-adrenoceptor blockers as cardiovascular therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther. 2003;100:215–234. [PubMed]
109. Kuroedov A, Cosentino F, Luscher TF. Pharmacological mechanisms of clinically favorable properties of a selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, nebivolol. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2004;22:155–168. [PubMed]
110. Poirier L, Cleroux J, Nadeau A, Lacourciere Y. Effects of nebivolol and atenolol on insulin sensitivity and haemodynamics in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2001;19:1429–1435. [PubMed]
111. Celik T, Iyisoy A, Kursaklioglu H, Kardesoglu E, Kilic S, Turhan H, et al. Comparative effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on oxidative stress, insulin resistance, plasma adiponectin and soluble P-selectin levels in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2006;24:591–596. [PubMed]
112. Oelze M, Daiber A, Brandes RP, Hortmann M, Wenzel P, Hink U, et al. Nebivolol inhibits superoxide formation by NADPH oxidase and endothelial dysfunction in angiotensin II-treated rats. Hypertension. 2006;48:677–684. [PubMed]
113. Mason RP, Kalinowski L, Jacob RF, Jacoby AM, Malinski T. Nebivolol reduces nitroxidative stress and restores nitric oxide bioavailability in endothelium of black Americans. Circulation. 2005;112:3795–3801. [PubMed]
114. Gomes A, Costa D, Lima JLFC, Fernandes E. Antioxidant activity of β-blockers: an effect mediated by scavenging reactive oxygen and nitrogen species? Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14:4568–4577. [PubMed]
115. Horani MH, Haas MJ, Mooradian AD. Suppression of hyperglycemia-induced superoxide formation and endothelin-1 gene expression by carvedilol. Am J Ther. 2006;13:2–7. [PubMed]
116. Fratta Pasini A, Garbin U, Nava MC, Stranieri C, Davoli A, Sawamura T, et al. Nebivolol decreases oxidative stress in essential hypertensive patients and increases nitric oxide by reducing its oxidative inactivation. J Hypertens. 2005;23:589–596. [PubMed]
117. Koyama Y, Kodama K, Suzuki M, Harano Y. Improvement of insulin sensitivity by a long-acting nifedipine preparation (nifedipine-CR) in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15:927–931. [PubMed]
118. Yagi S, Goto S, Yamamoto T, Kurihara S, Katayama S. Effect of cilnidipine on insulin sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2003;26:383–387. [PubMed]
119. McKeage K, Scott LJ. Manidipine: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 2004;64:1923–1940. [PubMed]
120. Lob H, Rosenkranz AC, Breitenbach T, Berkels R, Drummond G, Roesen R. Antioxidant and nitric oxide-sparing actions of dihydropyridines and ACE inhibitors differ in human endothelial cells. Pharmacology. 2006;76:8–18. [PubMed]
121. Rosenkranz AC, Lob H, Breitenbach T, Berkels R, Roesen R. Endothelial antioxidant actions of dihydropyridines and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;529:55–62. [PubMed]
122. Martinez MLL, Lopes LF, Coelho EB, Nobre F, Rocha JBT, Gerlach RF, et al. Lercanidipine reduces matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in patients with hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:117–122. [PubMed]
123. Yasunari K, Maeda K, Nakamura M, Watanabe T, Yoshikawa J. Benidipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, inhibits oxidative stress in polymorphonuclear cells in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2005;28:107–112. [PubMed]
124. Poulter NR, Wedel H, Dahlof B, Sever PS, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Role of blood pressure and other variables in the differential cardiovascular event rates noted in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) Lancet. 2005;366:907–913. [PubMed]
125. Zanella MT, Kohlmann O, Jr, Ribeiro AB. Treatment of obesity hypertension and diabetes syndrome. Hypertension. 2001;38:705–708. [PubMed]
126. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, et al. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men—a comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:914–921. [PubMed]
127. Hobbs FDR, Khan T, Collins B. Doxazosin versus bendrofluazide: a comparison of the metabolic effects in British South Asians with hypertension. Br J Clin Pract. 2005;55:437–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
128. Andersson P-E, Lithell H. Metabolic effects of doxazosin and enalapril in hypertriglyceridemic, hypertensive men: relationship to changes in skeletal muscle blood flow. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:323–333. [PubMed]
129. Bakris GL, Weir MR, Sowers JR. Therapeutic challenges in the obese diabetic patient with hypertension. Am J Med. 1996;101:33S–46S. [PubMed]
130. Dell'Omo G, Penno G, Pucci L, Pellegrini G, Scotti A, Del Prato S, et al. The vascular effects of doxazosin in hypertension complicated by metabolic syndrome. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16:67–73. [PubMed]
131. Lithell HO. Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and the treatment of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:150S–154S. [PubMed]
132. Calo LA, Bertipaglia L, Pagnin E, Davis PA, Sartori M, Semplicini A, et al. Effect of doxazosin on oxidative stress related proteins in essential hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2006;28:181–188. [PubMed]
133. Henriksen EJ, Jacob S. Modulation of metabolic control by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. J Cell Physiol. 2003;196:171–179. [PubMed]
134. Zaman MA, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Nature Rev Drug Disc. 2002;1:621–636. [PubMed]
135. Fisher NDL, Hollenberg NK. Renin inhibition: what are the therapeutic opportunities? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:592–599. [PubMed]
136. Rahuel J, Rasetti V, Maibaum J, Rueger H, Goschke R, Cohen N-C, et al. Structure-based drug design: the discovery of novel nonpeptide orally active inhibitors of human renin. Chem Biol. 2000;7:493–504. [PubMed]
137. Abuissa H, Jones PG, Marso SP, O'Keefe JH., Jr Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:821–826. [PubMed]
138. Gillespie EL, White CM, Kardas M, Lindberg M, Coleman CI. The impact of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2261–2266. [PubMed]
139. The DREAM Trial Investigators. Rationale, design and recruitment characteristics of a large, simple international trial of diabetes prevention: the DREAM trial. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1519–1527. [PubMed]
140. The DREAM Trial Investigators. Effect of ramipril on the incidence of diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1551–1562. [PubMed]
141. Higashiura K, Ura N, Takada T, Li Y, Torii T, Togashi N, et al. The effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist on insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:290–297. [PubMed]
142. Nawano M, Anai M, Funaki M, Kobayashi H, Kanda A, Fukushima Y, et al. Imidapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, improves insulin sensitivity by enhancing signal transduction via insulin receptor substrate proteins and improving vascular resistance in the Zucker fatty rat. Metabolism. 1999;48:1248–1255. [PubMed]
143. Ekelund U. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on arterial, venous and capillary functions in cat skeletal muscle in vivo. Acta Physiol Scand. 1996;158:29–37. [PubMed]
144. Henriksen EJ, Jacob S, Kinnick TR, Youngblood EB, Schmit MB, Dietze GJ. ACE inhibition and glucose transport in insulin-resistant muscle: roles of bradykinin and nitric oxide. Am J Physiology Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1999;277:R332–R336. [PubMed]
145. Feldman RD, Schmidt ND. Quinapril treatment enhances vascular sensitivity to insulin. J Hypertens. 2001;19:113–118. [PubMed]
146. Watanabe S, Tagawa T, Yamakawa K, Shimabukuro M, Ueda S. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system prevents free fatty acid-induced acute endothelial dysfunction in humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2376–2380. [PubMed]
147. Steen MS, Foianini KR, Youngblood EB, Kinnick TR, Jacob S, Henriksen EJ. Interactions of exercise training and ACE inhibition on insulin action in obese Zucker rats. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:2044–2051. [PubMed]
148. Bolterman RJ, Manriquez MC, Ortiz Ruiz MC, Juncos LA, Romero JC. Effects of captopril on the renin angiotensin system, oxidative stress, and endothelin in normal and hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2005;46:943–947. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
149. Yu W, Akishita M, Xi H, Nagai K, Sudoh N, Hasegawa H, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor attenuates oxidative stress-induced endothelial cell apoptosis via p38 MAP kinase inhibition. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;364:328–334. [PubMed]
150. Huang Z, Jansson L, Sjoholm A. Pancreatic islet blood flow is selectively enhanced by captopril, irbesartan and pravastatin, and suppressed by palmitate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;346:26–32. [PubMed]
151. Lupi R, Del Guerra S, Bugliani M, Boggi U, Mosca F, Torri S, et al. The direct effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, zofenoprilat and enalaprilat, on isolated human pancreatic islets. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:355–361. [PubMed]
152. Cheung BMY, Cheung GTY, Lauder IJ, Lau C-P, Kumana CR. Meta-analysis of large outcome trials of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20:37–43. [PubMed]
153. Bergstrom G, Johansson I, Wickman A, Gan L, Thorup C. Brief losartan treatment in young spontaneously hypertensive rats abates long-term blood pressure elevation by effects on renal vascular structure. J Hypertens. 2002;20:1413–1421. [PubMed]
154. Olsen MH, Fossum E, Hoieggen A, Wachtell K, Hjerkinn E, Nesbitt SD, et al. Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy. J Hypertens. 2005;23:891–898. [PubMed]
155. Zandbergen AAM, Lamberts SWJ, Janssen JAMJL, Bootsma AH. Short-term administration of an angiotensin-receptor antagonist in patients with impaired fasting glucose improves insulin sensitivity and increases free IGF-I. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155:293–296. [PubMed]
156. Benndorf RA, Rudolph T, Appel D, Schwedhelm E, Maas R, Schulze F, et al. Telmisartan improves insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension. Metabolism. 2006;55:1159–1164. [PubMed]
157. Schupp M, Janke J, Clasen R, Unger T, Kintscher U. Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g activity. Circulation. 2004;109:2054–2057. [PubMed]
158. Schupp M, Clemenz M, Gineste R, Witt H, Janke J, Helleboid S, et al. Molecular characterization of new selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g modulators with angiotensin receptor blocking activity. Diabetes. 2005;54:3442–3452. [PubMed]
159. Benson SC, Pershadsingh HA, Ho CI, Chittiboyina A, Desai P, Pravenec M, et al. Identification of telmisartan as a unique angiotensin II receptor antagonist with selective PPARγ-modulating activity. Hypertension. 2004;43:993–1002. [PubMed]
160. Nagel JM, Tietz AB, Goke B, Parhofer KG. The effect of telmisartan on glucose and lipid metabolism in nondiabetic, insulin-resistant subjects. Metabolism. 2006;55:1149–1154. [PubMed]
161. Clasen R, Schupp M, Foryst-Ludwig A, Sprang C, Clemenz M, Krikov M, et al. PPARg-activating angiotensin type-1 receptor blockers induce adiponectin. Hypertension. 2005;46:137–143. [PubMed]
162. Okada K, Hirano T, Ran J, Adachi M. Olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II receptor blocker ameliorates insulin resistance and decreases triglyceride production in fructose-fed rats. Hypertens Res. 2004;27:293–299. [PubMed]
163. Shiuchi T, Iwai M, Li H-S, Wu L, Min L-J, Li J-M, et al. Angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker valsartan enhances insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscles of diabetic mice. Hypertension. 2004;43:1003–1010. [PubMed]
164. Bayorh MA, Ganafa AA, Eatman D, Walton M, Feuerstein GZ. Simvastatin and losartan enhance nitric oxide and reduce oxidative stress in salt-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:1496–1502. [PubMed]
165. Yusuf S. From the hope to the ontarget and the transcend studies: challenges in improving prognosis. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:18–25. [PubMed]
166. Teo K, Yusuf S, Sleight P, Anderson C, Mookadam F, Ramos B, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of 2 large, simple, randomized trials evaluating telmisartan, ramipril, and their combination in high-risk patients: the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial/Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND) trials. Am Heart J. 2004;148:52–61. [PubMed]
167. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet. 2003;362:777–781. [PubMed]
168. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:709–717. [PubMed]
169. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1309–1321. [PubMed]
170. Soberman JE, Weber KT. Spironolactone in congestive heart failure. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000;2:451–456. [PubMed]
171. Pitt B. Effect of aldosterone blockade in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: implications of the RALES and EPHESUS studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004;217:53–58. [PubMed]
172. Epstein M, Calhoun DA. The role of aldosterone in resistant hypertension: implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Curr Hypertens Reps. 2007;9:98–105. [PubMed]
173. Weinberger MH, White WB, Ruilope L-M, MacDonald TM, Davidson RC, Roniker B, et al. Effects of eplerenone versus losartan in patients with low-renin hypertension. Am Heart J. 2005;150:426–433. [PubMed]
174. Fallo F, Federspil G, Veglio F, Mulatero P. The metabolic syndrome in primary aldosteronism. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007;9:106–111. [PubMed]
175. Fallo F, Veglio F, Bertello C, Sonino N, Della Mea P, Ermani M, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:454–459. [PubMed]
176. Stas S, Whaley-Connell A, Habibi J, Appesh L, Hayden MR, Karuparthi PR, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade attenuates chronic overexpression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system stimulation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase and cardiac remodeling. Endocrinology. 2007;148:3773–3780. [PubMed]
177. Stanton A. Potential of renin inhibition in cardiovascular disease. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2003;4:6–10. [PubMed]
178. Villamil A, Chrysant SG, Calhoun D, Schober B, Hsu H, Matrisciano-Dimichino L, et al. Renin inhibition with aliskiren provides additive antihypertensive efficacy when used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. J Hypertens. 2007;25:217–226. [PubMed]
179. Oh B-H, Mitchell J, Herron JR, Chung J, Khan M, Keefe DL. Aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent efficacy and sustained 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1157–1163. [PubMed]
180. Strasser RH, Puig JG, Farsang C, Croket M, Li J, van Ingen H. A comparison of the tolerability of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:780–787. [PubMed]
181. Stanton A, Jensen C, Nussberger J, O'Brien E. Blood pressure lowering in essential hypertension with an oral renin inhibitor, aliskiren. Hypertension. 2003;42:1137–1143. [PubMed]
182. Gradman AH, Schmieder RE, Lins RL, Nussberger J, Chiang Y, Bedigian MP. Aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent antihypertensive efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2005;111:1012–1018. [PubMed]
183. Munger MA, Drummond W, Essop MR, Maboudian M, Khan M, Keefe DL. Aliskiren as add-on to amlodipine provides significant additional blood pressure lowering without increased oedema associated with doubling the amlodipine dose. World Congress of Cardiology. 09-02-2006.
184. Jordan J, Engeli S, Boye SW, Le Breton S, Keefe DL. Direct renin inhibition with aliskiren in obese patients with arterial hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;49:1047–1055. [PubMed]
185. Oparil S, Yarows SA, Patel S, Fang H, Zhang J, Satlin A. Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007;370:221–229. [PubMed]
186. Uresin Y, Taylor A, Kilo C, Tschope D, Santonastaso M, Ibram G, et al. Aliskiren, a novel renin inhibitor, has greater BP lowering than ramipril and additional BP lowering when combined with ramipril in patients with diabetes and hypertension. 16th European Meeting on Hypertension. European Heart Journal. 6-12-2006.
187. Wood JM, Maibaum J, Rahuel J, Grutter MG, Cohen N-C, Rasetti V, et al. Structure-based design of aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;308:698–705. [PubMed]
188. Wood JM, Schnell CR, Cumin F, Menard J, Webb RL. Aliskiren, a novel, orally effective renin inhibitor, lowers blood pressure in marmosets and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 2005;23:417–426. [PubMed]
189. Fogari R, Zoppi A, Preti P, Fogari E, Malamani G, Mugellini A. Differential effects of ACE-inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on fibrinolysis and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive postmenopausal women. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14:921–926. [PubMed]
190. Karlberg BE. Cough and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens Suppl. 1993;11:S49–S52. [PubMed]
191. Fisher NDL, Allan D, Kifor I, Gaboury CL, Williams GH, Moore TJ, et al. Responses to converting enzyme and renin inhibition: role of angiotensin II in humans. Hypertension. 1994;23:44–51. [PubMed]
192. Lindstrom J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemio K, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet. 2006;368:1673–1679. [PubMed]
193. Hayden MR, Tyagi SC. Isolated low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C): implications of global risk reduction. Case report and systematic scientific review. Cardiovasc Diabet. 2005;4:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
194. Burke LE, Dunbar-Jacob JM, Hill MN. Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19:239–263. [PubMed]