PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of eidEmerging Infectious Diseases
 
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 October; 15(10): 1668–1670.
PMCID: PMC2866385

West Nile Virus Infection in Plasma of Blood and Plasma Donors, United States

Abstract

This study investigated the association of ongoing West Nile virus (WNV) infections with neutralizing antibody titers in US plasma-derived intravenous immune globulin released during 2003–2008. Titers correlated closely with the prevalence of past WNV infection in blood donors, with 2008 lots indicating a prevalence of 1%.

Keywords: West Nile virus, intravenous immunoglobulins, IGIV, West Nile Virus, viral antibodies, neutralization tests, epidemiology, blood, blood products, viruses, dispatch

West Nile virus (WNV) is a flavivirus endemic to the United States; typically, hundreds of clinical cases of infection occur each year. The observed number of clinical WNV infections as collated by ArboNET (www.cdc.gov) and the incidence of asymptomatic WNV infections as shown by nucleic acid testing (NAT) of the US blood supply (1) indicate that ≈3 million WNV infections occurred in humans during 1999– 2008.

Because the immune system elicits WNV neutralizing antibodies in response to WNV infection, detectable levels of WNV neutralizing antibodies in the blood of persons with previous WNV infection is expected. Consequently, lots of immune globulin-intravenous (human) (IGIV) manufactured from plasma collected in the United States contain WNV neutralizing antibodies (2). Those IGIV lots, each prepared from several thousand plasma donations to ensure a broad spectrum of antibodies, can be used as an epidemiologic tool that enables the surveillance of thousands of persons in a community through analysis of comparatively few samples. In this study, we demonstrated the increasing trend of WNV-neutralizing antibody titers in lots of IGIV.

Comparing these titers with those of persons with confirmed past WNV infection provides an independent measure of the percentage of the US population previously infected with WNV. Several WNV vaccine trials are ongoing or imminent, so information about the prevalence of past WNV infection in the United States is valuable for planning the demonstration of vaccine efficacy. Low incidence and lack of highly WNV-endemic areas in the United States preclude classic vaccine field trials because of study size requirements and cost-logistics difficulties.

The Study

The WNV neutralization titers of several US plasma–derived IGIV products (Gammagard Liquid/KIOVIG; Gammagard S/D/ Polygam S/D; Iveegam EN [Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA]) and plasma samples obtained from US blood donors after a NAT-confirmed WNV infection were determined by an infectivity assay as earlier described (2), adapted to a classical microneutralization format (3). WNV neutralization titers (i.e., the reciprocal dilution of a 1:2 series resulting in 50% neutralization [NT50; detection limits <0.8 for undiluted IGIVs and <7.7 for 1:10 prediluted serum]) are reported as the mean ± SEM. An unpaired t test was used to evaluate whether titer differences between 2 groups were statistically significant.

Using an extrapolation derived from screening the US blood supply for WNV (1), we calculated the average annual number of WNV infections in the United States for 1999–2008. The total number of neuroinvasive cases reported for those years to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through ArboNET was multiplied by 256 (i.e., the factor between all WNV infections and neuroinvasive cases). The cumulative infection rate for each year during 1999–2008 was then calculated by dividing the infections occurring up to a specific year by the US population for that year (determined by US Census Bureau estimates [www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html]).

Although WNV was first introduced into the United States in 1999, only in 2003 did the mean WNV neutralization titers of IGIV lots released to the market start to increase markedly (Figure 1). According to extrapolations from the WNV screening of the US blood supply (1), by 2003, an estimated 0.5% of the US population had been infected with WNV, although most infections were asymptomatic.

Figure 1
West Nile virus (WNV) neutralization titers of US plasma-derived immune globulin intravenous (human) (IGIV) lots by year of production and estimated percentage of the US population with past WNV infection by year. WNV neutralization titers were determined ...

A delay of ≈1 year occurs between the collection of plasma and the release of IGIV lots to the market; thus, the WNV-positive IGIV lots in 2003 reflect the larger number of WNV infections occurring in 2002. Using the same extrapolations from the US blood supply (1), we found that the ≈0.1% annual increments in the proportion of the US population with past WNV infection follow a straight line (r2 = 0.9996), generally paralleled by the mean WNV neutralization titers of IGIV lots. During 2005–2008, when large numbers of lots of a single IGIV product (Gammagard Liquid) could be analyzed, the WNV neutralization titer increased by 3.6 per year (r2 = 0.9793).

US plasma-derived IGIV lots released during 2008 showed variable WNV neutralization titers ranging from 2.8 to 69.8; mean ± SEM titer was 21 ± 1 (n = 256) (Figure 2). Compared with titers shown to be protective in an animal model of WNV infection (equivalent to >21 by the current assay) (2), ≈40% of the 2008 IGIV lots had higher titers.

Figure 2
West Nile virus (WNV) neutralization by US plasma-derived immune globulin intravenous (human) (IGIV) released in 2008 and plasma from donors with past WNV infection (past WNV), confirmed by nucleic acid testing. WNV neutralization titers are shown as ...

Plasma obtained from persons with NAT-confirmed WNV infection had even higher titers; mean ± SEM titer was 208 ± 40 for 30 persons available for testing. When results were corrected for the immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentration in plasma (≈1%), compared with the 10% IGIV preparations, the mean neutralization titer of the plasma samples was ≈100× higher than that of the IGIV lots tested (2,080 vs. 21).

Conclusions

The most comprehensive collation of information about the incidence of WNV infection in the United States is available from ArboNET. When that information is combined with information obtained from the nationwide screening of the blood supply for WNV RNA by NAT (1,4,5), the current prevalence of past WNV in the US population is estimated to be ≈1%.

Busch et al. has noted that large-scale, community-based serologic surveys are hardly feasible because of their expense and because WNV ELISA assays are possibly biased by cross-reactions with other flaviviruses (1). Nevertheless, 7 seroepidemiologic studies have been performed (612). Cumulatively, 5,503 persons were tested for WNV infection by ELISA, and the results have shown highly divergent seroprevalence rates ranging between 1.9% (6) and 14.0% (10).

The use of IGIV lots, each representing the serostatus of several thousand donors in 1 sample, makes seroepidemiology practical (13) because it allows a large donor population to be surveyed by analyzing comparably few samples. The use of a more complex yet functional virus neutralization assay minimizes concerns about cross-reactivity with flaviviruses of other serocomplexes (e.g., dengue virus) that occasionally circulate in the US population. Also, epidemiologic considerations render interference by St. Louis encephalitis virus, a flavivirus within the same serocomplex, highly unlikely (2). The specificity of the neutralization assay was confirmed by testing IGIV lots manufactured from European-derived plasma against tick-borne encephalitis virus, a flavivirus closely related to WNV and circulating in Europe. Although these lots contained high neutralization titers against tick-borne encephalitis virus, only 1 of 20 had a detectable neutralization titer of 5 against WNV (unpub. data).

In this study, we determined that the mean titer of samples obtained during 2003–2008 from persons with a confirmed diagnosis of WNV infection was 100× higher than the mean titers of IGIV lots produced in 2008. This determination provides an independent experimental measure of the frequency of past WNV infection in the general US population, as reflected by the plasma/blood donor community, and the results correlate well with results of previously published theoretical extrapolations (1), which estimated that ≈1% of the population has already been infected with WNV.

The increasing levels of WNV neutralizing antibodies in IGIV lots from US plasma and the particularly high titers in donors who have had a WNV infection suggest the possibility of preparing IGIV products with sufficiently high titers to be useful for WNV prophylaxis or treatment. Several ongoing or imminent WNV vaccine clinical trials stress the practical value of an independent confirmation of extrapolations that estimate the percentage of the US population with past WNV infection. Knowing the percentage of preexisting WNV seroprevalence as well as estimates of the mostly asymptomatic incidence rates (14) can be of vital importance in designing vaccine trials.

Acknowledgments

P. Noel Barrett and Don A. Baker are acknowledged for providing unconditional support and strategic vision for the project reported. We are also indebted to John S. Finlayson for critical review of this manuscript. Critical reagents have been generously provided by Susan L. Stramer and Robert E. Shope.

Biography

• 

Ms Planitzer is writing her PhD thesis on virus antibodies in immune globulins at the Global Pathogen Safety Group of Baxter BioScience in Vienna, Austria, in collaboration with the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Her research focuses on determining functional antiviral properties of immunoglobulin preparations.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Planitzer, CB, Modrof J, Yu M-yW, Kreil TR. West Nile virus infection in plasma of blood and plasma donors, United States. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2009 Oct [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/15/10/1668.htm

References

1. Busch MP, Wright DJ, Custer B, Tobler LH, Stramer SL, Kleinman SH, et al. West Nile virus infections projected from blood donor screening data, United States, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:395–402 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Planitzer CB, Modrof J, Kreil TR West Nile virus neutralization by US plasma-derived immunoglobulin products. J Infect Dis 2007;196:435–40 10.1086/519392 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Ehrlich HJ, Muller M, Oh HM, Tambyah PA, Joukhadar C, Montomoli E, et al. A clinical trial of a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine derived from cell culture. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2573–84 10.1056/NEJMoa073121 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Busch MP, Caglioti S, Robertson EF, McAuley JD, Tobler LH, Kamel H, et al. Screening the blood supply for West Nile virus RNA by nucleic acid amplification testing. N Engl J Med 2005;353:460–7 10.1056/NEJMoa044029 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Stramer SL, Fang CT, Foster GA, Wagner AG, Brodsky JP, Dodd RY West Nile virus among blood donors in the United States, 2003 and 2004. N Engl J Med 2005;353:451–9 10.1056/NEJMoa044333 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Mandalakas AM, Kippes C, Sedransk J, Kile JR, Garg A, McLeod J, et al. West Nile virus epidemic, northeast Ohio, 2002. [PMID: 16318737] Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:1774–7 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Meyer TE, Bull LM, Cain HK Pascua RF, Travassos da Rosa A, Gutierrez CR, et al. West Nile virus infection among the homeless, Houston, Texas. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1500–3. PMID: 18257995 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Schweitzer BK, Kramer WL, Sambol AR, Meza JL, Hinrichs SH, Iwen PC Geographic factors contributing to a high seroprevalence of West Nile virus–specific antibodies in humans following an epidemic. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006;13:314–8 10.1128/CVI.13.3.314-318.2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Schellenberg TL, Anderson ME, Drebot MA, Vooght MT, Findlater AR, Curry PS, et al. Seroprevalence of West Nile virus in Saskatchewan’s Five Hills Health Region, 2003. Can J Public Health 2006;97:369–73 [PubMed]
10. Murphy TD, Grandpre J, Novick SL, Seys SA, Harris RW, Musgrave K West Nile virus infection among health-fair participants, Wyoming 2003: assessment of symptoms and risk factors. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2005;5:246–51 10.1089/vbz.2005.5.246 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Mostashari F, Bunning ML, Kitsutani PT, Singer DA, Nash D, Cooper MJ, et al. Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey. Lancet 2001;358:261–4 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05480-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Michaels SR, Balsama GA, Kukreja M, Anderson C, Straif-Bourgeois S, Talati G, et al. Surveillance for West Nile virus cases in Louisiana 2001–2004. J La State Med Soc 2005;157:269–72 [PubMed]
13. Audet S, Virata-Theimer ML, Beeler JA, Scott DE, Frazier DJ, Mikolajczyk MG, et al. Measles-virus-neutralizing antibodies in intravenous immunoglobulins. J Infect Dis 2006;194:781–9 10.1086/506363 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Samuel MA, Diamond MS Pathogenesis of West Nile virus infection: a balance between virulence, innate and adaptive immunity, and viral evasion. J Virol 2006;80:9349–60 10.1128/JVI.01122-06 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention