PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 21.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2866011
NIHMSID: NIHMS197628

Striatal dopamine modulates basal ganglia output and regulates social context-dependent behavioral variability through D1 receptors

Abstract

Cortico–basal ganglia (BG) circuits are thought to promote the acquisition of motor skills through reinforcement learning. In songbirds, a specialized portion of the BG is responsible for song learning and plasticity. This circuit generates song variability that underlies vocal experimentation in young birds and modulates song variability depending on the social context in adult birds. When male birds sing in the presence of a female, a social context associated with decreased BG-induced song variability, the extracellular dopamine (DA) level is increased in the avian BG nucleus Area X. These results suggest that DA could trigger song variability changes through its action in Area X. Consistent with this hypothesis, we report that DA delivered to Area X weakens the output signal of the avian cortico-BG circuit. Acting through D1 receptors, DA reduced responses in Area X to song playback and to electrical stimulation of its afferent cortical nucleus HVC. Specifically, DA reduced the response to direct excitatory input and decreased firing variability in Area X pallidal neurons, which provide the output to the thalamus. As a consequence, DA delivery in Area X also decreased responses to song playback in the cortical output nucleus of the BG loop, the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium (LMAN). Further, interfering with D1 receptor transmission in Area X abolished social context-related changes in song variability. In conclusion, we propose that DA acts on D1 receptors in Area X to modulate the BG output signal and trigger changes in song variability.

Keywords: birdsong, Dopamine, Globus Pallidus [Pallidum], Motor Learning, Neuromodulation, striatum

Introduction

Cortico–basal ganglia (BG) circuits are thought to promote motor skill acquisition through reinforcement learning (Hikosaka et al., 2002; Graybiel et al., 2005). During reinforcement learning, individuals first explore their environment. Reinforcers shape this variable behavior until it converges on an optimum for a particular context. Thereby, repetition of a successful behavior (exploitation) replaces exploration (Sutton and Barto, 1990; Ishii Yoshida and Yoshimoto, 2002). It remains unclear which neural circuits allow the individual to switch from variable behavior underlying exploration to highly stereotyped behavior during exploitation, and how those circuits mediate the switch. However, changes in neural activity in the BG have been interpreted as representing the neural analog of explore-exploit behavior (Barnes et al., 2005).

Songbirds have a specialized portion of their BG, the anterior forebrain pathway (AFP, Fig 1C), which is needed for song learning and plasticity (Nordeen and Nordeen, 1997; Brainard and Doupe, 2002), but not for adult song production (Bottjer et al, 1984; Scharff and Nottebohm, 1991). This circuit generates song variability that underlies vocal experimentation in young birds (Ölveczky et al, 2005). In adult birds, the same circuit can modulate song variability depending on the social context (Kao et al, 2005; Kao and Brainard, 2006), or provide an instructive signal to guide adaptive changes in vocal output (Kao et al, 2008; Andalman and Fee, 2009). The neural input triggering changes in BG-driven song variability remains unknown.

Figure 1
DA suppresses responses to playback of the BOS in Area X output neurons

In the BG, the neuromodulator dopamine (DA) plays a key role in reinforcement learning (Montague et al., 1996). Because DA delivery in the striatum signals reward prediction errors, it may provide a reinforcement signal to the BG (Schultz et al., 1993; Phillips et al., 2003; Wise, 2004). However, recent studies suggest that DA function in motor learning may go beyond such a reinforcement signal (Salamone et al., 2005; Costa, 2007). In particular, the DA system is involved in the regulation of inter-individual differences in exploration and exploitation behaviors (Frank et al., 2009). Moreover, DA is also involved beyond motor learning in the representation of social cues in mammals (Wang et al, 1999; Anstrom et al., 2009; Aragona and Wang, 2009).

In songbirds, the song-related BG nucleus Area X receives dense dopaminergic innervation from the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Lewis et al., 1981; Bottjer, 1993; Gale et al., 2008). Immunocytochemical data suggests that DA plays a social context-dependent role in the regulation of vocal communication (Heimovics and Riters, 2008). In particular, DA level is increased in Area X of male birds when they sing to females (Sasaki et al, 2006), a social context associated with decreased BG-induced song variability (Kao et al., 2005). Moreover, VTA neurons, possibly including dopaminergic neurons, show singing-related activity that is modulated by social context (Yanagihara and Hessler, 2006) and DA neurons express Fos after social stimuli (Bharati and Goodson, 2006). These results suggest that DA delivery in Area X could trigger changes in BG-driven song variability. More generally, such a mechanism would allow DA to regulate the balance between exploration and exploitation during and after the acquisition of motor skills.

Material and methods

Animals

Adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) were obtained from a commercial supplier and used in accordance with an animal protocol approved by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were housed under a 14/10h light/darkcycle with food and water available ad libitum.

Surgical procedures

In vivo recordings

Each animal was first food deprived for 30 min and then given three intramuscular injections totaling 5–6.5 ml/kg of 20% urethane over 1h. Local anesthetic (1% lidocaine) was injected under the scalp before the animal was placed in a stereotaxic apparatus with the beak at an angle of 64° downward from the horizontal. Small craniotomies were made above the midline reference point, the bifurcation of the midsagittal sinus, and above HVC (used as proper name) and the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium (LMAN) or Area X unilaterally. Lidocaine gel was then applied to the incision at 3h intervals.

Cannula implantation

We infused drugs in the CNS using a combination of osmotic minipumps and cannulas, as in Meitzen et al. (2007). Animals were anaesthetized with 2% isoflorane and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus with a head angle of 64°. Anesthesia was maintained with 1% isoflorane for the duration of the surgery. Local anesthetic (1% lidocaine) was injected under the scalp, and small craniotomies were made above the midline reference point, the bifurcation of themidsagittal sinus, and at 6.5–7 mm anterior, 1.8 mm lateral from the reference point. The head angle was then changed to 0°. Two small bent cannulae (Alzet) were lowered to the surface of Area X (2.5–3 mm deep) and attached to the skull with dental cement. An osmotic minipump (Alzet, length, 17 mm; diameter, 6 mm; filled weight, 0.5 g; model 1002, 14 d delivery) filled with 100 μl of drug solution was then connected to the two cannulae with polyvinylchloride tubing and a Y distributor. The pumps were placed in a custom built backpack strapped to the bird’s back using a harness made from surgical dressing. To mount the osmotic pump in the backpack, we used a 0.65 ml plastic microcentrifuge tube (ISC BioExpress) filled with 250 μl of sterile saline. We threaded the output tube of the pump through a hole in the cap and inserted the pump snugly into the microcentrifuge tube until the lid snapped into place. We sealed the lid and tube extrusion hole using cyanoacrylate adhesive and Parafilm(Fisher Scientific).

In vivo electrophysiology

Recordings

Glass pipettes (TW100F-3, World Precision Instruments) were pulled using a micropipette puller (Model P97, Sutter Instrument Co.), and the tips were blunted to impedances of 5 to 25MΩ. A ground electrode was placed in the cerebellum posterior to the midline reference point. A concentric stimulation electrode (FHC) was placed in HVC (0 mm rostral, 2.4 mm lateral to the midline reference point, 0.5 mm deep). The recording electrode signal was amplified 10x and low-pass filtered at 3kHz (Axoclamp2B amplifier, Molecular Devices), amplified further 100x and high-pass filtered at 300 Hz (model 440, Brownlee Precision). Recordings were monitored using an oscilloscope and an audio monitor. We searched for single-unit neuronal activity in Area X or LMAN using HVC stimulation as a search stimulus. Once a neuron was isolated, the electrophysiological signal was sampled at 20 kHz and spike times and raw traces were stored for further analysis (Spike2, Cambridge Electronic Design). Principal components analysis of the spike shapes allowed clear separation from noise and all extracted units obeyed a refractory period of 1 ms. In recordings in Area X, neurons displaying spontaneous firing above 25 spikes/s (sp/s) are referred to as pallidal neurons given their similarity with identified Area X pallidal neurons recorded at their terminals in the medial portion of the dorsolateral nucleus of the thalamus (DLM) (Person and Perkel, 2007). Moreover, we have shown in a previous study (Leblois et al., 2009) that over 66% of these neurons are antidromically activated from DLM. In contrast, Area X pallidal neurons recorded in DLM never display firing rates lower than 25 sp/s. Hence, Area X neurons displaying a firing rate lower than 25 sp/s are hereafter called putative interneurons.

Electrical stimulation

Recordings were performed during HVC microstimulation (monophasic 0.2 ms single pulses), with various stimulation intensities (10 to 2000 μA). Each pulse of HVC microstimulation saturated the amplifier and occluded spiking activity for 1–2 ms in the recordings, due to the “overshoot” following saturation. Because the duration of this stimulation artifact was much shorter than the fastest responses recorded, it occluded only spontaneous activity and thus did not alter our analysis of evoked firing. Previous studies have shown that stimulation with a monopolar microelectrode at 200 uA activates about 50% of the neurons located in a shell of 0.2 mm outside radius (Ranck, 1975; Tehovnik et al, 2006). These values should be considered with caution because the current intensity necessary to activate a soma or axon at a given distance depends on a number of other variables such as the size of the cell or its biophysical properties (e.g. cellular excitability or axon myelination). In addition, concentric bipolar electrodes greatly reduce current spread, especially for higher stimulation intensities (Bagshaw and Evans, 1976; Follett and Mann, 1986), and estimates from monopolar electrodes thus provide an imprecise upper bound of the activated volume. The volume of the “activated shell” for 200 μA (inside and outside radius: 0.1 and 0.2 mm), is 0.029 mm3, and represents about 10% or less of HVC volume (0.2–0.5 mm3, MacDougall-Shackleton et al, 1998). Therefore, 200 μA pulses applied near the center of HVC through concentric bipolar electrodes are expected to activate fewer than 5% of HVC neurons.

We cannot exclude the possibility that some high amplitude stimulation led to current spread to neighboring structures. However, because of the segregation of the anterior forebrain pathway (AFP) circuit, we believe that occasional activation of neighboring structures does not modify the interpretation of the present data.

Drug injections

All drugs were diluted in a 0.9% saline solution with 0.5% dextran-conjugated Alexa-fluor 488 (3000 molecular weight; Invitrogen). The role of DA in Area X was examined using micro-injection of DA or related compunds (0.5–2 mM, Tocris). Drugs were pressure ejected from glass pipettes (10–20 μmtip diameter) using a Pressure System IIe (Toohey Co.; 50-ms pulses at 10–16 psi). Injected volumes were 20–100 nl. When the recording and drug injections were made in the same structure, we aimed to place the tip of the injection pipette 200–300 μm from the tip of the recording pipette. We recorded 21 neurons in Area X before, during and after DA injections in the same nucleus in 10 birds (1–4 neurons per bird). We recorded 17 neurons in LMAN before, during and after DA injections in Area X in 13 birds (1–3 neurons per bird). When multiple neurons were recorded from the same animal, we waited at least 2h between two consecutive DA injections to make sure that DA was washed out.

In vitro electrophysiology

Preparation of brain slices

Slicing procedures were as described by Farries and Perkel (2000). Briefly, each animal was anesthetized with isoflurane and euthanized by decapitation. The brain was dissected rapidly into ice-cold, oxygenated artificial CSF (ACSF) containing the following (in mM): 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1 NaH2PO4, 16.2 NaHCO3, 11 D-glucose, and 10 HEPES, osmolarity adjusted to 300 mOsm with sucrose. Coronal brain slices (300–450 μm thick) were prepared using a vibrating microtome (Vibratome), and slices were stored at room temperature submerged in bubbled ACSF in which HEPES was replaced with equiosmolar NaHCO3. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All solutions were bubbled with a 95% O2 and 5% CO2 mixture.

Electrophysiological recording

After resting for at least 1 h after sectioning, slices were placed in a recording chamber and superfused with ACSF heated to 28–30°C. Glass pipettes were pulled to a tip of < 2 μm in diameter (Micropipette Puller P-97, Sutter Instrument Co.), filled with 0.9% saline, and had a resistance of 4–8 MΩ. Signals were amplified with either an Axoclamp 2B (Molecular Devices) followed by a Brownlee Precision DC amplifier, or with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular devices). Signals were low-pass filtered at 3 kHz, high-pass filtered at 300 Hz, and digitized at 20 kHz with a Digidata 1322A (Molecular Devices) and stored on a personal computer using pClamp 9 (Molecular Devices). A tungsten bipolar stimulating electrode was placed near the boundary of Area X in a location that distinguishes inputs from HVC versus the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior neostriatum (LMAN), on the basis of a previous description of innervation patterns (Ding and Perkel, 2003). Recording pipettes were placed near and ventral to the stimulating electrode in most cases. The spatial relationship between the stimulating and recording electrodes in the other axes varied. Once a spontaneously active neuron was located, the recording electrode was approached as close as possible to obtain a signal-to-noise ratio > 3. Then, short latency spiking was evoked by electrical stimulation at 0.1 – 0.2 Hz.

Anatomy

Following in vivo recording

At the end of each acute recording experiment, recording sites were labeled by iontophoretic injections of fluorescent dye (5% Alexa-488- or -568-conjugated 10kDa dextranamine in 0.01M phosphate-buffer PB, pH 7.4, ejected by 5 μA DC pulses of 7 s duration, 50% duty cycle for 5 min.). Animals were euthanized by intramuscular injection of sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal) and perfused transcardially with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde as fixative. The brain was then removed, post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24h, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose. 40μm-thick sections were then cut in the parasagittal plane on a freezing microtome and processed for histological examination to verify the location of stimulating and recording electrodes, and drug-injection sites. In addition to gross observation of electrode tracts, the brain slices were visualized using a fluorescence microscope to allow better determination of recording location. A summary of recording locations reconstructed from stereotaxic coordinates and post-hoc histological analysis is presented on Fig. 2.

Figure 2
Location of neurons recorded in Area X and LMAN in vivo, reconstructed from stereotaxic coordinates and post-hoc histological analysis

Following cannula infusion

At the end of cannulation experiments, animals were euthanized by overdose of pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. The brain was then removed, post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24h, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose. 50μm-thick sections were then cut in the parasagittal plane on a freezing microtome, mounted on slides and stained with cresyl violet. Histological examination showed that the cannula tip was in Area X or less than 500 μm away from the edge of Area X in all four birds, and that any lesion due to cannula placement and drug flow was restricted to a region not exceeding 10% of the total volume of Area X. Fig. 10B displays a 50 μm parasagittal brain section showing the track of the cannula used to infuse drugs in the behaving bird.

Figure 10
Infusion of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 in Area X abolishes differences in song variability due to social context

Song recordings

Birds were individually housed in sound isolation chambers (Acoustic Systems, Austin, TX) 7 days before and 20–40 days following the cannula implantation surgery. We continually recorded spontaneous vocalizations using Syrinx software (John Burt, www.syrinxpc.com). In addition, we recorded vocalizations evoked by the presentation of a female by placing a female in the cage for 3–4 min, at intervals > 20 min. Such presentation was performed less than 6 times a day and for at least three days in each condition.

Data analysis

Acute recordings

Spike times were analyzed using Matlab software (version 7.5.0.342, R2007b, MathWorks, Natick, MA). For each cell, we calculated spontaneous firing rate, interspike interval (ISI) distribution, and peri-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) of the response to HVC stimulation and/or to song playback. The average firing rate during song playback was calculated. Spontaneous firing rate was calculated during a window of same duration as the song playback preceding the playback. The difference between the firing rate during and before a given song playback was calculated for each trial and averaged across trials to give a mean song response strength (Solis and Doupe, 1997). Song response strength measurements were used to calculate the discriminability statistic d′, which is used to quantify the selectivity of a neuron for a given stimulus over another (Solis and Doupe, 1997), where the differencebetween the average song response strength (RS) to two songs was normalized by the square root of the average of the variances of the song response strength (σ) measurementsfor the two songs.

dBOSRev=2(RS¯BOSRS¯Rev)σ2BOS+σ2Rev

Analyses of responses to HVC stimulation were performed on PSTHs smoothed as follows. For each trial, the firing-rate time course was determined with 1 ms resolution by convolving the spike train with a Gaussian kernel of width 1 ms (Baker and Gerstein, 2001). The mean and SD of the spontaneous rate were determined over the 100 ms preceding stimulation. A neuron was considered to display a significant response if at least two consecutive bins of the PSTH were beyond limits defined by the spontaneous mean ± 2.5 SD. Responses were often made up of several components (especially in Area X pallidal cells), some inhibitory and some excitatory. We defined the beginning of the response component as the time of the first of two consecutive bins of the PSTH in which the firing rate fell outside significance limits; similarly, the end occurred when two consecutive bins fell back within significance limits. Stimulation response strength, similar to the song response strength but calculated over a short time window (30 ms in Area X, 60 ms in LMAN), was defined as the difference between the average firing rate over the response window following HVC stimulation, and the average spontaneous firing rate over a window of the same duration preceding HVC stimulation. We defined excitation (or inhibition) relative area as the percentage increase or decrease in number of spikes relative to the average number of spikes, across the population of cells, expected in a response window of spontaneous firing. To this end, the area of the PSTH significantly above (or below) spontaneous firing was divided by the population average spontaneous firing rate. The result was expressed as a percentage of the population average spontaneous firing. For LMAN neurons, Area X putative interneurons and pallidal neurons displaying only excitatory responses, the lowest stimulation current intensity evoking a reliable response (at least one additional spike in each trial) was selected for further analysis. For pallidal neurons displaying some inhibition in response to stimulation, the lowest current intensity evoking an inhibitory component in their response was selected for further analysis.

Song sorting and analysis

Songs were sorted and analyzed using custom Matlab programs. Zebra finch songs are highly stereotyped, making them especially well suited for in-depth analysis. The acoustic structure ofsong is arranged in a hierarchy, with 5–50 ms vocal units known as syllables strung together in a stereotyped sequence called a motif. Each song consists of one or several motifs, preceded by introductory notes and separated from each other by <100 ms of silence. We designed a program to sort motifs and songs from all sound files continuously recorded using the syrinx software. Briefly, the program detected putative motifs based on peaks in the cross correlation between the recorded sound file and a clean pre-selected motif. Such putative motifs were then sorted based on their spectral similarity with the pre-selected clean motif, using thresholds set by the experimenter. For motifs for which such analysis did not allow unambiguous distinction, an additional PCA analysis on the spectrograms of putative motifs allowed us to sort motifs from other sounds. This analysis allowed us to successfully sort >90% of the motifs sung by a bird on a given day (assessed by comparing hand sorting with the automated sorting by the program).

Song analysis consisted of determining the fundamental frequency of harmonic stacks and the frequency of the lowest harmonic in all sub-syllabic elements displaying clear frequency modulation. The latter feature is strongly correlated with fundamental frequency for sub-syllabic elements displaying a harmonic stack structure (cf below), and can also be calculated for non-harmonic elements. Fundamental frequency was calculated based on peaks in the auto-correlation function, as in Kao and Brainard (2006). The frequency of the lowest harmonic was estimated as follows. For each sub-syllabic element considered, we selected a time window where the frequency of the lowest harmonic was stable. The spectrogram of the corresponding note was calculated and the frequency of its lowest harmonic was estimated within this time window. To improve the resolution of this frequency estimate, we performed a piecewise cubic spline interpolation of the mean spectrogram around its peak. We evaluated variability in the frequency of the lowest harmonic by calculating the standard deviation of its distribution over all clean renditions of the motif in each condition. The number of motif renditions considered was: 81 ± 38 at baseline, 73 ± 62 during SCH23390 infusion and 57 ± 28 during saline infusion for female evoked vocalizations (range 22–159); 3300 ± 2500 at baseline, 1800 ± 1600 during SCH infusion, and 1800 ± 1100 during saline infusion for spontaneous vocalizations (range 470–5441).

For the sub-syllabic element displayed in Fig. 10, we compared our estimate of the lowest harmonic with fundamental frequency estimates. There was a strong correlation between the results of the two methods (R2=0.98, n=1000 randomly sampled songs).

Both context and treatment might affect the location of the bird when singing and its variability, inducing fluctuations of signal amplitude. To rule out an influence of the location of the bird on song variability, we calculated the correlation between our measure of the frequency of the lowest harmonic and random fluctuations of signal amplitude. We found no correlation between the signal amplitude and the frequency of the lowest harmonic for the sub-syllabic element displayed in Fig. 10 (R2= 0.07, n=1000 randomly sampled songs).

Statistics

Numerical values are given as mean ± SD, unless stated otherwise. Response latency, strength and duration before and after drug injections were compared using a paired t-test. In addition, for each cell, spontaneous activity over multiple trials was compared before and after drug injection using a paired t-test. For the behavioral experiment, CV of the frequency of the lowest harmonic of sub-syllabic elements and relative frequency variability were compared across different conditions using paired t-tests. For each paired t-test applied, we report the associated p-value (the probability of observing the given result, or one more extreme, by chance if the null hypothesis is true), the value of the test statistic (t), and the degrees of freedom of the test (df).

Results

DA decreases song responses in BG output neurons

We first investigated the effects of DA on responses evoked by song playback in Area X pallidal neurons, most of which project to the thalamic nucleus DLM (Leblois et al., 2009). As described previously (Doupe, 1997; Solis and Doupe, 1997; Person and Perkel, 2007; Gale and Perkel, in press), pallidal neurons increased their firing rate in response to playback of BOS, with an average response strength of 8.4 ± 5.1 sp/s (n=13). Other sound stimuli (noise, conspecific song and BOS played in reverse) evoked weaker responses. We measured the selectivity of responses to BOS in pallidal neuron with the discriminability index d′, which averaged 1.6 ± 0.9 (n=10), significantly greater than 0 (p<0.001, t=5.2, df=9).

Injection of DA into Area X suppressed responses to BOS playback in Area X pallidal cells (Fig. 1A). Overall, the BOS response strength after DA injection was significantly lower than under control conditions (from 8.9 ± 5.6 to 2.2 ± 1.3 sp/s, n=7, p=0.01, t=3.5, df=6; Fig. 1D), and the selectivity of the remaining responses was significantly decreased (d′ from 1.4 ± 1 to −0.2 ± 0.4, p=0.02, t=3.2, df=6) and not different from 0 (p>0.1, t=−1.4, df=6). Similarly, injections of the D1 receptor agonist SKF38393 in Area X suppressed song responses in Area X (BOS response strength: from 10.1 ± 3.9 sp/s to 2.9 ± 1.4 sp/s, n=3, p=0.04, t=5, df=2; d′: from 2.1 ± 0.5 to 0.1 ± 1.6, p=0.1, t=3, df=2). Responses returned after washout of the drug in 6/7 neurons following DA (BOS response strength: 9.7 ± 7.6 sp/s, d′: 0.7 ± 1.5) injection and 1/3 neurons following SKF38393 injection (BOS response strength: 5.8 sp/s, d′: −1). In contrast to dopaminergic drugs, injection of saline did not modify the response of pallidal neurons to BOS playback (BOS response strength: from 5.5 ± 4.1 to 6.7 ± 3, n=3, p>0.1, t=−1.3, df=2; d′: from 2.3 ± 3 to 1.6 ± 0.9, p>0.5, t=0.5, df=2; Fig. 1E). Changes in song response under DA were often accompanied by increased spontaneous activity (Fig. 1A, see next section for extensive analyses of changes in spontaneous activity). It is possible that elevated firing rates contributed in some cases to decreased responses in pallidal neurons due to a ceiling effect. Responses to BOS playback were strongly suppressed in Area X pallidal neurons, however, even when spontaneous activity was not affected (n=3/7 under DA and 1/3 SKF; Fig. 1B). Moreover, there was a complete lack of correlation between increase in spontaneous firing rate and reduction in song response (R2=0.002).

In summary, DA injection in Area X of urethane-anaesthetized zebra finches strongly dampened responses of Area X pallidal neurons to song playback.

DA increases intrinsic activity in BG output neurons through D1 receptors

We further examined the effects of DA on spontaneous firing of Area X neurons using a combination of in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological recordings. In vivo, Area X pallidal neurons displayed high spontaneous activity (mean firing rate: 58 ± 15 sp/s, n=24). Spontaneous activity was significantly increased by DA injection in Area X in most pallidal neurons (10/15, Fig. 3A) and decreased in only one neuron. Overall, DA significantly increased spontaneous activity by 5 sp/s (to 63 ± 14 sp/s, n=15, p=0.001, t=−3, df=14), which recovered after washout (60 ± 13 sp/s, p=0.04, t=−2.2, df=14). Concerning putative Area X interneurons, the effect of DA on spontaneous firing rate was not consistent (Fig. 3B). Spontaneous activity was increased in two such cells, increased in one and unchanged in two. In vivo injections of the D1 receptor agonist SKF38393 appeared to have similar effects on pallidal spontaneous activity as DA, increasing spontaneous firing rate in most neurons, although the increase was significant in only 4/9 cells, and the overall change in average firing rate was not significant (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3
DA increases intrinsic activity of Area X output neurons through D1 receptors

In vitro, DA increased the intrinsic firing rate of putative pallidal cells, defined as cells displaying a spontaneous firing rate above 10 sp/s. DA significantly increased the firing rate from 19 ± 8 sp/s to 22 ± 9 sp/s, (n=18, p=0.005, t=−3.2, df=17, Fig. 3D). Because these recordings were made in the presence of the ionotropic glutamate and GABAA receptor blockers kainic acid and picrotoxin, respectively, the effect of DA was likely direct on pallidal neurons rather than through indirect circuit effects. This increase in firing rate was mimicked by application of the D1 receptor agonist SKF38393 (from 19 ± 3 sp/s to 27 ± 17 sp/s, n=11, significant only when the cell with the largest increase was excluded: p=0.001, t=−5, df=8). The effect of DA was blocked by prior application of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (from 19 ± 8 sp/s to 20 ± 10 sp/s, n=7, p=0.2, t=0.8, df=6). The D2 receptor agonist quinpirole had no effect (from 17 ± 6 sp/s to 17 ± 6 sp/s, n=5, p=0.9, t=−0.1, df=4).

These results indicate that DA, acting via D1 receptors, increases the intrinsic spontaneous activity of Area X pallidal neurons.

DA decreases responses in Area X to HVC electrical stimulation

Area X receives auditory input from nucleus HVC. Area X pallidal neurons receive direct excitatory input from HVC as well as feed-forward inhibition via Area X interneurons (Farries et al., 2005). The reduction of song-evoked responses in Area X pallidal neurons might rely on change in the responsiveness of Area X neurons to their direct input from HVC. To test whether DA modulates the responsiveness of Area X neurons to their input from HVC, we recorded the response of Area X neurons to HVC electrical stimulation (see Leblois et al. 2009) before and after DA injection in Area X.

DA suppressed the rapid excitation evoked by HVC stimulation in Area X pallidal neurons (Fig. 4A and B) sometimes revealing or increasing an inhibitory component of the response (Fig. 4A). DA injection suppressed the peak of the population average of responses to HVC stimulation (Fig. 4C). Over all neurons, the average peak response dropped from 363 ± 133 sp/s to 190 ± 103 sp/s after DA injection (n=16, p<10−4, t=6, df=15) and recovered to 357 ± 143 after washout. Moreover, the stimulation response strength over a 30 ms window following HVC stimulation dropped from 49 ± 24 sp/s to 3 ± 23 sp/s (p<10−6, t=10.8, df=15), and recovered after washout to 47 ± 27 sp/s (Fig. 4D). To provide a fuller description of the data, we also examined the relative area (see methods) and duration of the excitatory and inhibitory components of the responses. For each response feature, a t-test revealed a significant change between the baseline and DA conditions. A False Discovery Rate analysis indicates that some of the tests are at the threshold for statistical significance (threshold p value of 0.04). DA decreased both the relative area and the duration of the excitatory components in the response of pallidal neurons to HVC stimulation (excitation relative area: from 112 ± 61 % to 32 ± 27 %, p=10−5, t=6.6, df=15, Fig. 4E; excitation duration: from 18 ± 11 ms to 9 ± 5 ms, p=0.004, t=3.4, df=15, Fig. 4F). These values recovered after washout (excitation relative area: 90 ± 54 %; excitation duration: 16 ± 9 ms). The inhibitory components in response to HVC stimulation were larger and longer in duration after DA injection (inhibition relative area: from 3 ± 5 % to 11 ± 11 %, p=0.03, t=2.4, df=15, Fig. 4G; inhibition duration from 2 ± 3 ms to 5 ± 4 ms, p=0.04, t=−2.1, df=15, Fig. 4H), and recovered after washout (inhibition relative area: 5 ± 7 %; inhibition duration: 3 ± 4 ms). Overall, DA decreased the response of pallidal neurons to HVC stimulation, reducing the excitatory component of the responses and emphasizing their inhibitory component.

Figure 4
DA decreases the response of Area X neurons to HVC stimulation

In putative interneurons, DA decreased the rapid evoked excitation to a lesser extent (Fig. 4I). In these neurons, the stimulation response strength decreased only slightly on average, from 44 ± 44 sp/s at baseline to 23 ± 53 sp/s (n=5, p=0.03, t=4.1, df=3, Fig. 4J), and recovered after washout to 40 ± 45 sp/s. DA did not cause a significant change in the response peak in interneurons (from 373 ± 183 sp/s to 268 ± 256 sp/s).

DA thus reduced the responses of all Area X neurons to HVC electrical stimulation, and the response reduction was more pronounced in pallidal neurons.

DA reduces pallidal neuron response to direct HVC inputs

To dissect the mechanisms by which DA reduces the response of pallidal neurons to song and to HVC electrical stimulation, we studied the effects of DA in an in vitro preparation. Stimulation of HVC fibers innervating Area X led to a rapid and strong increase in firing in Area X putative pallidal neurons (see Materials and Methods). These responses were suppressed by application of the glutamate AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX (Fig. 5A). CNQX strongly decreased the stimulation response strength from 49 ± 13 sp/s to 9 ± 14 sp/s (n=4, p=0.03, t=5.4, df=3, Fig 5B). Stimulation response strength recovered after washout (27 ± 13 sp/s). The response peak also decreased in the presence of CNQX, from 140 ± 40 sp/s to 33 ± 25 sp/s (p=0.02, t=4.7, df=3), and recovered after washout to 85 ± 34 sp/s. Conversely, responses were unaffected by the cholinergic receptor antagonists mecamylamine and atropine (stimulation response strength from 32 ± 19 sp/s to 27 ± 14 sp/s, n=4, p>0.5, t=0.9, df=2; response peak from 92 ± 53 sp/s to 75 ± 51 sp/s, p>0.05, t=1.2, df=2; Fig. 5C). Therefore, responses of pallidal neurons to HVC fiber stimulation in vitro were mediated by glutamate, similar to responses to HVC stimulation in vivo (Leblois et al., 2009).

Figure 5
DA reduces the response of pallidal neurons to their excitatory inputs from HVC

As observed in vivo, DA application also diminished responses of pallidal neurons to stimulation of HVC fibers in vitro (Fig. 5D). Stimulation response strength was decreased from 20 ± 18 sp/s at baseline to 9 ± 8 sp/s under DA (n=8, p=0.01, t=3.5, df=7, Fig. 5E), and recovered after washout (17 ± 15 sp/s). Response peaks also strongly decreased, from 102 ± 40 sp/s at baseline to 54 ±31 sp/s under DA (p=0.002, t=4.8, df=7), and recovered to 84 ± 44 sp/s after washout. In the presence of the GABAA blocker picrotoxin, DA still diminished pallidal responses to HVC fiber stimulation (Fig. 5F). Stimulation response strength decreased from 30 ± 35 sp/s at baseline to 13 ± 19 sp/s under DA (n=13, p=0.01, t=2.3, df=12, Fig. 5G), and recovered to 36 ± 49 sp/s after washout. Similarly, peak response decreased from 94 ± 60 sp/s at baseline to 59 ± 44 sp/s under DA (p=0.02, t=2.6, df=12) and recovered after washout (94 ± 60 sp/s). Therefore, the DA induced decrease in the response of pallidal neurons to HVC stimulation was not solely due to a change in the feedforward inhibition received by pallidal neurons. Instead, DA decreased the effect of direct excitatory input from HVC on the firing of pallidal neurons.

D1 receptors mediate the DA effect on pallidal neuron responses

We then sought to determine the DA receptor type underlying the effect of DA on the response of pallidal neurons to HVC inputs. Prior application of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 blocked the effect of DA on the HVC electrical stimulation excitation of Area X pallidal neurons (Fig. 6A). Over all, the stimulation response strength was unchanged by DA in the presence of SCH23390 (from 29 ± 20 sp/s to 26 ± 26 sp/s, n=9, p=0.9, t=0.06, df=8, Fig. 6C). The response peak was also unchanged (from 134 ± 47 sp/s to 129 ± 52 sp/s, p=0.6, t=0.8, df=8). Moreover, the DA D1 receptor agonist SKF38393 mimicked DA and reduced the response to HVC fibers stimulation in pallidal neurons (Fig. 6B). SKF38393 strongly decreased the stimulation response strength (from 10 ± 10 sp/s to 5 ± 8 sp/s, n=10, p=0.01, t=2.3, df=9, Fig. 6D) as well as the response peak (from 77 ± 37 sp/s to 53 ± 35 sp/s, p=0.03, t=2.7, df=8). Both values recovered after washout (stimulation response strength: 7 ± 12 sp/s; response peak: 59 ± 40 sp/s). On the contrary, the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole did not change either the stimulation response strength (from 21 ± 21 sp/s to 17 ± 17 sp/s, n=5, p=0.3, t=1.1, df=4, Fig. 6E) or peak (from 120 ± 17 sp/s to 117 ± 10 sp/s, p=0.8, t=0.2, df=4) of pallidal responses to HVC fiber stimulation.

Figure 6
DA reduces the response of pallidal neurons to HVC stimulation by acting through D1 receptors

Therefore, the DA induced decrease in HVC-driven responses of Area X pallidal neurons is mediated by D1 receptors.

DA reduces firing variability in Area X pallidal neurons

Because irregular firing in Area X pallidal neurons can drive firing in downstream thalamic neurons in nucleus DLM, we then investigated how DA affected the firing variability of Area X output pallidal neurons in vivo. We compared the variability in ISI duration in three different conditions: in spontaneous firing, in the response to song playback, and in the response to HVC electrical stimulation. In all cases, DA led to an increase in firing regularity as measured by a narrowing of the ISI distribution. Neurons whose firing rate increased after DA treatment displayed a shift in the peak of their ISI distribution (Fig. 7A). More importantly, the ISI distribution was much narrower after DA injection than it was at baseline or after washout, and the shortest and longest ISIs did not occur when DA was applied. Similarly, neurons that did not undergo a change in mean firing rate nevertheless displayed a narrowing of the ISI distribution after DA injection, with fewer short and long ISIs (Fig. 7B). Thus, over the entire population of neurons tested, DA application caused a narrowing of the mean ISI distribution over all Area X pallidal neurons examined (Fig. 7C), and the number of shorter and longer ISI was significantly decreased (ratio of ISIs < 8ms: from 6 ± 4 % to 3 ± 4 %, p=0.005, t=4.8, df=14; ratio of ISIs > 25 ms: from 14 ± 18 % to 6 ± 10 %, p=0.01, t=2.1, df=14). DA application decreased the coefficient of variation (CV) of the ISI distribution in spontaneous activity in all Area X pallidal neurons (from 0.35 ± 0.06 to 0.24 ± 0.06, n=15, p<10−5, t=9.6, df=14, Fig. 7D). The CV recovered after washout (to 0.3 ± 0.05).

Figure 7
DA reduces the variability in the spontaneous and evoked firing of pallidal neurons

DA also decreased firing variability in response to song playback or in response to HVC stimulation. In response to playback of the BOS, the average ISI distribution narrowed (Fig. 7E), shorter ISIs became less frequent (ratio of ISIs < 8ms: from 38 ± 8 % to 10 ± 11 %, p=10−7, t=21.2, df=6), and the ISI CV was decreased (from 0.36 ± 0.07 to 0.2 ± 0.06, n=7, p=0.008, t=3.8, df=6, Fig. 7F) after DA application. Similarly, DA application caused shorter ISIs in response to HVC stimulation to become less frequent (ratio of ISIs < 8ms: from 29 ± 12 % to 9 ± 11 %, p=10−6, t=18.4, df=14, Fig. 7G), and the ISI CV increased over all Area X pallidal neurons (from 0.59 ± 0.1 to 0.42 ± 0.12, n=15, p=0.002, t=4.2, df=14, Fig. 7H).

Overall, DA decreased the spontaneous and evoked firing variability in Area X pallidal neurons in vivo.

DA decreases responses to song playback in LMAN

Each thalamic neuron in nucleus DLM receives a tonic inhibitory input from a single Area X pallidal neuron. Its post-inhibitory rebound properties makes it likely to fire when a series of short ISIs in its pallidal input is followed by a longer ISI (Person and Perkel, 2005, 2007; Kojima and Doupe, 2009; Leblois et al., 2009). Therefore, thalamic firing, and, more generally, information transmission from HVC to LMAN, relies on a high variability in ISI duration of Area X pallidal neurons. Because DA decreases ISI length variability in Area X pallidal neurons, it is expected to impede information transmission along the AFP.

To test this hypothesis, we recorded evoked activity in nucleus LMAN before and after injecting DA in Area X. Consistent with our prediction, we found that DA reduced the response to song playback in LMAN neurons (Fig. 8A). Responses to playback of BOS were suppressed in all LMAN neurons recorded after DA injection in Area X (BOS response strength: 2.6 ± 1.8 sp/s to 0.4 ± 1.1 sp/s, n=10, p=0.0004, t=5.4, df=9, Fig. 8B), and recovered after washout (BOS response strength: 2.2 ± 2.1 sp/s, n=7). Not surprisingly, the selectivity of any remaining responses was also reduced (d′: 1.4 ± 1.0 to −0.3 ± 0.8, p=0.0006, t=5.1, df=9, Fig 8C), and recovered after washout (d′: 1 ± 0.9). In contrast, saline injections in Area X did not modify the strength or selectivity of responses to BOS playback in LMAN neurons (BOS response strength: 2.1 ± 1.6 sp/s to 2.3 ± 1.5 sp/s, n=3, p=0.7, t=−0.6, df=2; d′: 1 ± 1.2 to 1.3 ± 1, p=0.4, t=−0.2, df=2; Fig 8D, E).

Figure 8
DA reduces response to BOS playback in LMAN neurons

Responses of LMAN neurons to HVC electrical stimulation were also decreased after DA injections in Area X (n=6/7; Fig. 9A). Overall, the stimulation response strength was 8 ± 9 sp/s at baseline and 3 ± 5 sp/s following DA injection in Area X, and recovered to 8 ± 7 sp/s after washout (Fig. 9B). Moreover, the response peak was 48 ± 44 sp/s at baseline and 23 ± 20 sp/s under DA, and recovered to 48 ± 34 sp/s after washout (Fig. 9C). These decreases in stimulation response strength and response peak were not significant due to one neuron that showed an increased response after DA was injected in Area X. Interestingly, DA injections in Area X significantly decreased the duration of the response to HVC electrical stimulation in LMAN neurons (from 28 ± 13 ms to 14 ± 10 ms, n=7, p=0.02, t=3.4, df=6, Fig. 9D).

Figure 9
DA injection in Area X decreases the response to HVC stimulation in most LMAN neurons

Spontaneous activity in DLM and in LMAN is expected to decrease following DA injection due to the shorter and less variable length of ISIs in DLM inhibitory input from Area X. Surprisingly, spontaneous activity in LMAN was not affected by DA injection in Area X (from 2.3 ± 1.4 sp/s to 2.3 ± 1.6 sp/s, n=17, p=0.9, t=0.7, df=6), suggesting that LMAN spontaneous activity may not rely on its input from DLM. Alternatively, the relation between spontaneous activity in DLM and in Area X output neurons may be more complex than expected.

Activation of D1 receptors in the BG decreases song variability

Levels of extracellular DA measured in Area X differ in different social contexts (Sasaki et al., 2006). Because DA can modulate the amplitude of the output of the AFP through its effects in Area X, mostly through D1 receptors, it is a good candidate to trigger variability changes depending on the social context. To test this hypothesis, we blocked D1 receptors in Area X in behaving birds by slowly infusing the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 into Area X. To measure differences in variability associated with different social contexts, we measured the frequency of harmonic components of syllables that displayed a clear harmonic structure (Fig. 10A). Consistent with previous reports (Kao et al., 2005; Kao and Brainard, 2006; Sakata et al., 2008), we found that the frequency of the lowest harmonic was more variable when the male sang alone in the cage than when a female was present in the cage. The presence of a female decreased the CV of the frequency of the lowest harmonic (CVFLH) in 12 out of 13 sub-syllabic elements from 4 birds. Overall, the CVFLH was 0.019 ± 0.01 when a male sang alone, and 0.012 ± 0.01 in the presence of a female (p=0.001, t=4.4, df=12; Fig. 10D).

In line with our hypothesis, we found that infusion of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 abolished changes in variability related to social context (Fig. 10C). Indeed, the CVFLH of all sub-syllabic elements considered did not display any change in variability with social context when SCH23390 was infused in Area X (0.020 ± 0.011 when singing alone versus 0.021 ± 0.01 in the presence of a female, p=0.5, t=0.7, df=12; Fig. 10D). Even when considering only sub-syllabic elements showing context-dependent variability before surgery (12 out of 13), no difference was found between the two social contexts (CVFLH of 0.19 ± 0.007 alone versus 0.18 ± 0.008 with a female, p=0.4, t=0.8, df=11). The CVFLH during both social contexts after D1 receptor blockade was not significantly different from the CVFLH in the absence of a female before drug infusion (in presence of a female: p=0.9, t=0.2, df=12; in the absence of a female: p=0.4, t=1, df=12).

As a control, we infused saline in Area X before (1 bird) or after (3 bird) SCH23390 infusion. During saline infusion, the context-dependent song variability was restored, and the CVFLH was significantly lower in the presence of a female (0.014 ± 0.01 versus 0.017 ± 0.01 alone, p=0.02, t=3.9, df=12).

For each sub-syllabic element displaying context-dependent variability in frequency, we compared the SD of the lowest harmonic frequency when the bird was singing to a female relative to the SD of the lowest harmonic frequency when singing alone before surgery. This relative song variability measure was strongly increased under SCH23390 infusion, from 57 ± 16 % to 96 ± 29 % (p=0.0004, t=5, df=11), and partially recovered under saline infusion to 77 ± 23 % (Fig. 10E).

We also calculated the mean CVFLH over all sub-syllabic elements displaying context-dependent variability in frequency in each individual bird. Before surgery, the average per bird CVFLH (n=4) was significantly different in the absence or presence of a female (0.017 ± 0.004 versus 0.010 ± 0.002, p=0.04, t=3.5, df=3). During SCH23390 infusion, no significant difference was found between the two social contexts (average CVFLH of 0.018 ± 0.004 versus 0.016 ± 0.005, p=0.7, t=0.6, df=3). The variability was significantly lower in the presence of a female during saline infusion (average CVFLH of 0.015 ± 0.002 alone versus 0.012 ± 0.002 with a female, p=0.02, t=5, df=3).

In addition, we were able to extract the fundamental frequency from a subset of sub-syllabic elements that exhibited harmonic stack structures. Under control conditions, the fundamental frequency of those 8 elements, from 3 birds, was significantly lower in the presence of a female (0.01 ± 0.003) than when the bird was alone (0.018 ± 0.004; p=0.0006, t=5.8, df=7). When D1 receptors were blocked by infusion of SCH23390 in Area X, there was no longer any difference between the two social contexts (0.02 ± 0.01 versus 0.021 ± 0.006; p=0.6, t=0.5, df=7). The difference in variability was retained after saline infusion in Area X, with a CV of the fundamental frequency of 0.012 ± 0.003 in the presence of a female, and 0.015 ± 0.004 when the bird was alone (p=0.03, t=2.8, df=7).

Other than the changes in song variability, there was an overall trend for mean frequency of the lowest harmonic to increase when a female was present in the cage (9/13 sub-syllabic elements showed an increase, 4/13 a decrease). The frequency was therefore 17 ± 27 Hz higher (+ 0.8 ± 1%, p=0.04, t=2.4, df=12) when a female was present in the cage than when the male sang alone. Although previous studies in zebra finches did not report any change in average song features (Kao et al., 2005; Kao and Brainard, 2006), this increase in frequency is consistent with an increase in fundamental frequency reported in Bengalese finch singing to females (Sakata et al., 2008).

In contrast to the variability measures, changes in the mean frequency of the lowest harmonic induced by SCH23390 infusion in Area X were not consistent among the 13 sub-syllabic elements considered. During SCH23390 infusion, 9/13 sub-syllabic elements sung in the absence of a female displayed an increase in their mean frequency of the lowest harmonic (8/13 in the absence of a female), while 4/13 displayed a decrease in mean frequency (5/13 in the absence of a female). Changes were not significant in either social context (p>0.5, t=−0.3, df=12).

These results indicate that the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 abolished social context-related song variability when infused in Area X without altering average song features.

Discussion

We report here that delivering DA in the BG reduces the output of the AFP, a BG-thalamo-cortical circuit known to regulate song variability. DA acts through D1 receptors to reduce the response to HVC excitatory inputs in pallidal neurons, which provide BG output to the thalamus. Interfering with D1 receptor transmission abolishes social context-related changes in song variability. Our data indicate that DA triggers variability changes in song by modulating the amplitude of the AFP output signal through its action on D1 receptors in Area X.

Mechanisms underlying DA effect in the BG

DA modifies neuronal activity and synaptic transmission in the BG in mammals (Calabresi et al., 2000) and in birds (Ding and Perkel, 2002; Ding et al., 2003). Because the striatum receives the largest DA input in the BG in mammals (Smith and Villalba, 2008), previous studies have concentrated on DA effects on striatal neurons. Endogenous DA reduces responses to glutamate (Kiyatkin and Rebec, 1996, 1999) or to behaviorally relevant stimuli (Rolls et al., 1984; Nicola et al., 2000) mainly by acting on D1 receptors in mammalian striatal neurons. Similarly, in songbirds, D1 receptor activation depresses glutamatergic synaptic current in Area X spiny neurons (Ding and Perkel, 2002). Consistent with this effect, we found that DA decreases the response to HVC glutamatergic input in Area X putative interneurons, possibly including but not restricted to spiny neurons (which are thought not to project out of the nucleus). Area X inhibitory interneurons induce feedforward inhibition on pallidal neurons, shifting single spikes (Leblois et al., 2009). Therefore, the decreased responsiveness of Area X inhibitory interneurons under DA may partially underlie the increased regularity of evoked pallidal firing reported here.

Although DA innervation is much weaker in BG output nuclei than in the striatum in mammals, DA can directly affect the activity of BG output neurons (Kliem et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2009). In vitro, DA increases spontaneous activity and firing regularity in nigral neurons through D1 receptors (Zhou et al., 2009), an effect similar to the effects reported here on avian pallidal neurons. In contrast, Kliem et al. (2007) reported an increase in GABA levels and a decrease in spontaneous activity mediated by D1 receptors in pallidal and nigral neurons in vivo.

All previous studies focused on localized effects of DA in each BG structure, and it is difficult to predict how simultaneous DA release in several BG nuclei would globally modulate information transmission through the circuit. Because Area X includes both striatal neurons and pallidal-like output neurons, our study provides new insight on the integrated action of DA on the BG network as a whole.

DA and social behaviors

DA plays an important role in the modulation of social behavior, including display of social status (Miczek and Gold, 1983), defensive/submissive behavior (Puglisi-Allegra and Cabib, 1997), and mating behavior (Young and Wang, 2004). In particular, DA release in the BG is crucial for pair-bond formation during mating (Wang et al., 1999; Aragona et al., 2003). In songbirds, DA affects the motivation to sing (Schroeder and Riters, 2006), and its role in song regulation is likely dependent on social context (Heimovics and Riters, 2008). Moreover, Sasaki et al. (2006) have shown that DA level in Area X is increased only in male birds singing toward a female, a social context associated with stereotyped song production. Our results suggest that higher DA levels in Area X in the presence of a female may be responsible for the decrease in AFP-driven song variability in this social context.

DA in song learning

BG circuits in general and the AFP in particular are proposed to introduce variability necessary for exploration during motor learning (Graybiel, 2005; Ölveczky et al., 2005). In adult birds, song variability is modulated with social context, and song is less variable when directed to a female than when the same song is sung in isolation (Sossinka and Böhner, 1980). A neural correlate of this behavioral modulation is found in the AFP; firing is reduced and less variable during directed singing in Area X and LMAN (Hessler and Doupe, 1999; Kao et al., 2008). Immediate early gene expression in Area X is also differentially modulated (Jarvis et al., 1998). Lesion or inactivation of the AFP output nucleus LMAN substantially reduces song variability, suggesting that the AFP regulates both developmental and contextual modulation of song (Kao et al., 2005; Ölveczky et al., 2005).

Recent anatomical and physiological data shed light on a loop circuit linking Area X to DA neurons in the SNc and VTA (Gale et al., 2008; Gale and Perkel, in press). Through this circuit, song playback activates dopaminergic neurons, which in turn trigger strong DA release in Area X. Like neurons in the AFP, VTA neurons in adult zebra finches show singing-related activity that is modulated by social context (Yanagihara and Hessler, 2006), though it is unknown whether the neurons recorded were dopaminergic. Extracellular DA level in Area X is higher when adult zebra finches sing to a female, but not when they do not sing or sing alone (Sasaki et al., 2006). Together, these results suggest that the dopaminergic input to Area X could trigger changes in song variability depending on social context. Consistent with these ideas, we have shown that DA decreases the output signal of the AFP through its action on D1 receptors in Area X and that interfering with D1 receptor transmission in Area X abolishes social context-dependent changes in song variability. Moreover, we found that LMAN firing evoked by HVC electrical stimulation was shorter in duration when we applied DA in Area X. Such reduced and more precise AFP activity when DA was delivered to Area X resembles AFP song-related activity during directed singing (Hessler and Doupe, 1999; Kao et al., 2008).

In addition to introducing variability, the AFP may provide patterned signals to guide changes in motor output (Kao et al., 2008; Andalman and Fee, 2009). Such signals would most likely come from HVC and be transformed in the AFP, potentially through DA-dependent mechanisms. Indeed, DA modulates the intrinsic excitability of Area X spiny neurons and the strength of their glutamatergic inputs and is necessary for long-term plasticity of these synapses (Ding and Perkel, 2002, 2004; Ding et al. 2003). Here we show that DA also modulates direct excitatory input from HVC to Area X pallidal neurons. Moreover, we show that DA increases spontaneous activity in pallidal neurons and shortens their ISIs. This ISI shortening is likely to modify information transfer through the AFP (Person and Perkel, 2005; Leblois et al., 2009). In addition to the increased spontaneous activity, the reduction in firing variability under DA in Area X pallidal neurons is likely to reduce evoked and/or spontaneous firing in DLM (Leblois et al., 2009), and is most likely responsible for the decrease in song response in LMAN.

DA and reinforcement learning

Interestingly, reward processing and social interaction processes share common neural substrates (Caldu and Dreher, 2007). In particular, DA release in the striatum signals reward prediction error, and may provide a reinforcement signal to the BG (Schultz et al., 1993; Phillips et al., 2003). As a reinforcer, phasic DA delivery could gradually shape motor behavior, thereby inducing a slow shift from motor exploration to the repetition of a successful behavior (exploitation, Sutton and Barto, 1990; Ishii Yoshida and Yoshimoto, 2002). Here, we highlight another possible role for the DA system in motor learning. According to our results, a change in DA level in the BG might rapidly trigger a switch between exploration and exploitation in learned behaviors. The proposed role of DA in balancing exploration and exploitation by reducing BG output signal is in line with several previous findings. First, DA-regulating genes are responsible for inter-individual differences in exploration and exploitation behaviors (Frank et al., 2009). Secondly, animals treated with drugs enhancing the DA signal such as cocaine or amphetamines induce behavioral stereotypy (Canales and Graybiel, 2000), and a recent study found that cocaine injections leading to stereotyped behavior in rats reduced evoked responses in BG output neurons (Aliane et al., 2009). Finally, differences in movement latency associated with different reward values, possibly reflecting a transition from exploration (when the action outcome is uncertain) to exploitation (when the action outcome is desirable), rely on D1-receptor transmission in the BG in primates (Nakamura and Hikosaka, 2006).

Relation to pathology

The BG are involved in several movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease (Chesselet and Delfs, 1996). In parkinsonian patients and animal models of the disease DA depletion is associated with increased firing variability in the output neurons of the BG (Boraud et al., 2002). The mechanisms described here and that allow DA to modulate firing variability in BG output may be at least partly responsible for these pathological changes.

Conclusion

DA acts on D1 receptors in Area X to reduce firing variability in pallidal neurons, decreasing AFP output. In social contexts associated with increased DA release in Area X, AFP output is diminished, leading to stereotyped song production driven by the monosynaptic HVC-RA pathway. On the other hand, in social contexts associated with low DA levels in Area X, the AFP output signal is enhanced and leads to strong AFP-driven song variability. Such modulation of the balance between exploration and exploitation may be a critical role of DA in motor learning.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Max Sizemore, Abigail Person and Sam Gale for valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grants R01MH066128, R03DC009686 and P30DC004661.

References

  • Aliane V, Pérez S, Nieoullon A, Deniau JM, Kemel ML. Cocaine-induced stereotypy is linked to an imbalance between the medial prefrontal and sensorimotor circuits of the basal ganglia. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:1269–79. [PubMed]
  • Andalman AS, Fee MS. A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12518–23. [PubMed]
  • Anstrom KK, Miczek KA, Budygin EA. Increased phasic dopamine signaling in the mesolimbic pathway during social defeat in rats. Neuroscience. 2009;161:3–12. [PubMed]
  • Aragona BJ, Wang Z. Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent species. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009;3:15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bagshaw EV, Evans MH. Measurement of current spread from microelectrodes when stimulating within the nervous system. Exp Brain Res. 1976;25:391–400. [PubMed]
  • Baker SN, Gerstein GL. Determination of response latency and its application to normalization of cross-correlation measures. Neural Comput. 2001;13:1351–1377. [PubMed]
  • Barnes TD, Kubota Y, Hu D, Jin DZ, Graybiel AM. Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories. Nature. 2005;437:1158–61. [PubMed]
  • Bharati IS, Goodson JL. Fos responses of dopamine neurons to sociosexual stimuli in male zebra finches. Neuroscience. 2006;143:661–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boraud T, Bezard E, Bioulac B, Gross CE. From single extracellular unit recording in experimental and human Parkinsonism to the development of a functional concept of the role played by the basal ganglia in motor control. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;66:265–283. [PubMed]
  • Bottjer SW, Miesner EA, Arnold AP. Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science. 1984;224:901–3. [PubMed]
  • Bottjer SW. The distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the brains of male and female zebra finches. J Neurobiol 1993. 1993;24:51–69. [PubMed]
  • Brainard MS, Doupe AJ. What songbirds teach us about learning. Nature. 2002;417:351–8. [PubMed]
  • Calabresi P, Centonze D, Bernardi G. Electrophysiology of dopamine in normal and denervated striatal neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:S57–S63. [PubMed]
  • Caldú X, Dreher JC. Hormonal and genetic influences on processing reward and social information. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1118:43–73. [PubMed]
  • Canales JJ, Graybiel AM. A measure of striatal function predicts motor stereotypy. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:377–83. [PubMed]
  • Chesselet MF, Delfs JM. Basal ganglia and movement disorders: an update. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:417–22. [PubMed]
  • Costa RM. Plastic corticostriatal circuits for action learning: what’s dopamine got to do with it? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1104:172–91. [PubMed]
  • Ding L, Perkel DJ. Dopamine modulates excitability of spiny neurons in the avian basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5210–5218. [PubMed]
  • Ding L, Perkel DJ, Farries MA. Presynaptic depression of glutamatergic synaptic transmission by D1-like dopamine receptor activation in the avian basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6086–6095. [PubMed]
  • Doupe AJ. Song- and order-selective neurons in the songbird anterior forebrain and their emergence during vocal development. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1147–67. [PubMed]
  • Farries MA, Perkel DJ. Electrophysiological properties of avian basal ganglia neurons recorded in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:2502–13. [PubMed]
  • Farries MA, Ding L, Perkel DJ. Evidence for “direct” and “indirect” pathways through the song system basal ganglia. J Comp Neurol. 2005;484:93–104. [PubMed]
  • Follett KA, Mann MD. Effective stimulation distance for current from macroelectrodes. Exp Neurol. 1986;92:75–91. [PubMed]
  • Frank MJ, Doll BB, Oas-Terpstra J, Moreno F. Prefrontal and striatal dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in exploration and exploitation. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1062–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gale SD, Perkel DJ. Properties of dopamine release and uptake in the songbird basal ganglia. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1871–9. [PubMed]
  • Gale SD, Person AL, Perkel DJ. A novel basal ganglia pathway forms a loop linking a vocal learning circuit with its dopaminergic input. J Comp Neurol. 2008;508:824–39. [PubMed]
  • Gale SD, Perkel DJ. A basal ganglia pathway drives selective auditory responses in songbird dopaminergic neurons via disinhibition. J Neurosci. in press. Received on 10/27/2009. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Graybiel AM. The basal ganglia: learning new tricks and loving it. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:638–44. [PubMed]
  • Heimovics SA, Riters LV. Evidence that dopamine within motivation and song control brain regions regulates birdsong context-dependently. Physiol Behav. 2008;95:258–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hessler NA, Doupe AJ. Social context modulates singing-related neural activity in the songbird forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 1999a;2:209–11. [PubMed]
  • Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H. Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:217–22. [PubMed]
  • Ishii S, Yoshida W, Yoshimoto J. Control of exploitation-exploration meta-parameter in reinforcement learning. Neural Netw. 2002;15:665–87. [PubMed]
  • Jarvis ED, Scharff C, Grossman MR, Ramos JA, Nottebohm F. For whom the bird sings: context-dependent gene expression. Neuron. 1998;21:775–88. [PubMed]
  • Kao MH, Doupe AJ, Brainard MS. Contributions of an avian basal ganglia-forebrain circuit to real-time modulation of song. Nature. 2005;433:638–43. [PubMed]
  • Kao MH, Brainard MS. Lesions of an avian basal ganglia circuit prevent context-dependent changes to song variability. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:1441–55. [PubMed]
  • Kao MH, Wright BD, Doupe AJ. Neurons in a Forebrain Nucleus Required for Vocal Plasticity Rapidly Switch between Precise Firing and Variable Bursting Depending on Social Context. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13232–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kojima S, Doupe A. Activity propagation in an avian basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit essential for vocal learning. J Neurosci. 2009;29:4782–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kiyatkin EA, Rebec GV. Dopaminergic modulation of glutamateinduced excitations of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:142–153. [PubMed]
  • Kiyatkin EA, Rebec GV. Striatal neuronal activity and responsiveness to dopamine and glutamate after selective blockade of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in freely moving rats. J Neurosci. 1999;19:3594–609. [PubMed]
  • Kliem MA, Maidment NT, Ackerson LC, Chen S, Smith Y, Wichmann T. Activation of nigral and pallidal dopamine D1-like receptors modulates basal ganglia outflow in monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:1489–500. [PubMed]
  • Leblois A, Bodor AL, Person AL, Perkel DJ. Millisecond timescale disinhibition mediates fast information transmission through an avian basal ganglia loop. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15420–15433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lewis JW, Ryan SM, Arnold AP, Butcher LL. Evidence for a catecholaminergic projection to area X in the zebra finch. J Comp Neurol. 1981;196:347–54. [PubMed]
  • MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Hulse SH, Ball GF. Neural correlates of singing behavior in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) J Neurobiol. 1998;36:421–30. [PubMed]
  • Meitzen J, Moore IT, Lent K, Brenowitz EA, Perkel DJ. Steroid hormones act transsynaptically within the forebrain to regulate neuronal phenotype and song stereotypy. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12045–57. [PubMed]
  • Miczek KA, Gold LH. Ethological analysis of amphetamine action on social behavior in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) Prog Clin Biol Res. 1983;131:137–55. [PubMed]
  • Montague PR, Dayan P, Sejnowski TJ. A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. J Neurosci. 1996;16:1936–47. [PubMed]
  • Nakamura K, Hikosaka O. Role of dopamine in the primate caudate nucleus in reward modulation of saccades. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5360–9. [PubMed]
  • Nicola SM, Surmeier J, Malenka RC. Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:185–215. [PubMed]
  • Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ. Anatomical and synaptic substrates for avian song learning. J Neurobiol. 1997;33:532–48. [PubMed]
  • Olveczky BP, Andalman AS, Fee MS. Vocal experimentation in the juvenile songbird requires a basal ganglia circuit. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Person AL, Perkel DJ. Unitary IPSPs drive precise thalamic spiking in a circuit required for learning. Neuron. 2005;46:129–40. [PubMed]
  • Person AL, Perkel DJ. Pallidal neuron activity increases during sensory relay through thalamus in a songbird circuit essential for learning. J Neurosci. 2007;27:8687–98. [PubMed]
  • Phillips PE, Stuber GD, Heien ML, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking. Nature. 2003;422:614–8. [PubMed]
  • Puglisi-Allegra S, Cabib S. Psychopharmacology of dopamine: the contribution of comparative studies in inbred strains of mice. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;51:637–61. [PubMed]
  • Ranck JB., Jr Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res. 1975;98:417–40. [PubMed]
  • Rolls ET, Thorpe SJ, Boytim M, Szabo I, Perrett DI. Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 3 Effects of iontophoretically applied dopamine on normal responsiveness. Neuroscience. 1984;12:1201–12. [PubMed]
  • Sakata JT, Brainard MS. Online contributions of auditory feedback to neural activity in avian song control circuitry. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11378–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Salamone JD, Correa M, Mingote SM, Weber SM. Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005;5:34–41. [PubMed]
  • Sasaki A, Sotnikova TD, Gainetdinov RR, Jarvis ED. Social context-dependent singing-regulated dopamine. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9010–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scharff C, Nottebohm F. A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J Neurosci. 1991;11:2896–913. [PubMed]
  • Schroeder MB, Riters LV. Pharmacological manipulations of dopamine and opioids have differential effects on sexually motivated song in male European starlings. Physiol Behav. 2006;88:575–84. [PubMed]
  • Schultz W, Apicella P, Ljungberg T. Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. J Neurosci. 1993;13:900–913. [PubMed]
  • Smith Y, Villalba R. Striatal and extrastriatal dopamine in the basal ganglia: an overview of its anatomical organization in normal and Parkinsonian brains. Mov Disord. 2008;23(Suppl 3):S534–47. [PubMed]
  • Solis MM, Doupe AJ. Anterior forebrain neurons develop selectivity by an intermediate stage of birdsong learning. J Neurosci. 1997;17:6447–62. [PubMed]
  • Sutton RS, Barto AG. Time derivative models of Pavlovian reinforcement. In: Gabriel MR, Moore JW, editors. Learning and Computational Neuroscience: Foundations of Adaptive Networks. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 1990. pp. 497–537.
  • Tehovnik EJ, Tolias AS, Sultan F, Slocum WM, Logothetis N. Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:512–21. [PubMed]
  • Wang Z, Yu G, Cascio C, Liu Y, Gingrich B, Insel TR. Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated regulation of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): a mechanism for pair bonding? Behav Neurosci. 1999;113:602–11. [PubMed]
  • Wise RA. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:483–94. [PubMed]
  • Yanagihara S, Hessler NA. Modulation of singing-related activity in the songbird ventral tegmental area by social context. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:3619–27. [PubMed]
  • Young LJ, Wang Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1048–54. [PubMed]
  • Zhou FW, Jin Y, Matta SG, Xu M, Zhou FM. An ultra-short dopamine pathway regulates basal ganglia output. J Neurosci. 2007;29:10424–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]