PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2864010
NIHMSID: NIHMS187501

Symptom Burden in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Objective

To determine (1) the frequency, severity, and reported course of 7 symptoms in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and (2) the association between these symptoms and patient functioning.

Design

Postal survey.

Setting

Community.

Intervention

A survey that included measures of the frequency, severity, and recalled course of pain, fatigue, numbness, weakness, shortness of breath, vision loss, and memory loss, as well as a measure of community integration and psychologic functioning was mailed to a sample of persons with SCI. One hundred forty-seven usable surveys were returned (response rate, 43% of surveys mailed).

Main Outcome Measures

The frequency and average severity of each symptom was computed, and the frequencies of each type of reported course were noted. Analyses estimated the associations among the symptoms, and between symptom severity and measures of patient functioning.

Results

The most common symptoms were pain, weakness, fatigue, and numbness. All symptoms were reported to remain the same or to get worse more often than they were reported to improve once they began. Pain, weakness, fatigue, and memory loss were the symptoms most closely associated with patient functioning.

Conclusions

Patients with SCI must deal with a number of secondary complications in addition to any disability caused by the injury itself. Of 7 symptoms studied, pain, weakness, and fatigue appeared to be most common and most closely linked to patient social and mental health functioning. Research is needed to identify the causal relationships between perceived symptoms and quality of life in patients with SCI and to identify effective treatments for those symptoms shown to impact patient functioning.

Keywords: Fatigue, Pain, Rehabilitation, Signs and symptoms, Spinal cord injuries

Although secondary complications in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), such as pressure ulcers,1,2 bowel dysfunction,2,3 bladder dysfunction,4 urinary tract infections,5 and obesity,6 as well as a limited number of complications that are related to subjective experience, such as pain and fatigue, have received a great deal of attention in the research literature, the scope and impact of a number of other secondary complications associated with SCI have not yet been the focus of much empirical study.

As indicated above, of the symptoms reported by persons with SCI, pain and fatigue have received the greatest empirical attention. Research on pain, for example, indicates that about one third of patients with SCI report severe pain.7 Research also indicates that pain can have a significant negative impact on the daily functioning of persons with SCI, including psychologic functioning812 and sleep.9,13 Moreover, research indicates that once pain problems develop, they rarely if ever resolve over time and in fact, for shoulder pain, show a tendency to worsen over time.14

Fatigue also is common in patients with SCI.15 Fatigue in persons with SCI has been typically discussed in terms of muscle fatigue and lack of endurance; that is, fatigue among persons with SCI has mostly been viewed as a physical construct1618 caused by weaker muscles that are more easily fatigable because of disuse (or overuse) and nerve damage.16,18,19 Like pain, research indicates that fatigue may have serious adverse impacts in the daily lives of persons with SCI.15,20 However, to our knowledge, no research has examined the extent to which fatigue improves or worsens over time in persons with SCI.

Prior research and our own clinical experience indicate that other symptoms, such as dyspnea (breathlessness), memory problems, vision problems, numbness, and perceived weakness, are reported by persons with SCI. Dyspnea has been reported in 24% and 6% of users and nonusers of motorized wheelchairs, respectively, in 1 sample of persons with SCI,21,22 and presence of dyspnea has been associated with level of injury.23,24

Concerning potential memory problems, the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) reported that 28% of patients with acute SCI had at least a minor brain injury, with 12% reported to have cognitive or behavioral changes associated these injuries.25 Kreutzer et al26 performed neuropsychologic testing in 30 consecutive SCI patients with no obvious traumatic brain injury and found problems in visual learning, verbal learning, visual organization, and attention.27,28

Sherman et al29 reported a case of traumatic optic neuropathy documented by magnetic resonance imaging in a man with T4 paraplegia after a motorcycle crash who denied any loss of consciousness. Vaccaro et al30 similarly reported a case of delayed cortical blindness in a patient with a C1 burst fracture (that resolved somewhat after cervical fusion). These case reports are consistent with our clinical experience that some patients with SCI report significant problems with their vision. However, to our knowledge, the frequency of vision problems and the potential impact of these problems on functioning have not yet been systematically examined in patients with SCI.

The subjective sensation of numbness can also be reported by persons with SCI, particularly at or below the level of injury, because of nerve damage or dysfunction. In a previous survey study of 84 community residents with SCI and chronic pain, 44 (52%) reported numb sensations, and 15 of these (18% of the sample) reported that the numb sensations were severe.31 As with most other symptoms that could be experienced by patients with SCI, the association between numb sensations and patient functioning has not been adequately studied.

Finally, perceived weakness has also been reported to be a common problem in patients with SCI.3234 However, to our knowledge, its frequency and association with patient functioning relative to other symptoms, such as pain and fatigue, have not yet been examined in samples of patients with SCI.

Although a great deal of research has studied a number of secondary medical conditions in persons with SCI, such as pressure ulcers and bladder and bowel dysfunction, less research has studied the many other symptoms often reported by patients with SCI. There is especially a lack of empirical information about the frequency and severity of symptoms such as dyspnea, memory problems, visual problems, numbness, and perceived weakness in persons with SCI. Moreover, the associations between these symptoms and measures of patient functioning have not yet been systematically examined. In addition, although some information about the course of pain in persons with SCI is available,19 very little, if any, information is available concerning the course of other symptoms when they occur, either in the long (ie, since onset) or short (ie, over the past 6mo) term. Therefore, we do not know if fatigue, memory loss, vision loss, numbness, and shortness of breath tend to improve, stay the same, or get worse when and if they develop in persons with SCI. If research shows that these symptoms improve after they develop, then clinicians can use this knowledge to inform patients that any problems with symptoms such as weakness or fatigue may be expected to resolve on their own. On the other hand, if research shows that these symptoms do not resolve on their own or even get worse over time, then this knowledge can be used by clinicians as an indication for effectively treating such symptoms as soon as possible when they are reported. Knowledge about the natural course of symptoms is also helpful for clinical researchers; any symptoms that are shown to be consistently associated with poor quality of life (QOL) and that either do not resolve or get worse over time should be targeted for treatment development, especially when and if there is a lack of effective treatments for these symptoms.

The primary purpose of this study was to increase our knowledge about the nature and impact of a number of symptoms commonly reported by persons with SCI. Specifically, we sought (1) to determine the relative frequency and severity of pain, fatigue, numbness, weakness, shortness of breath, vision loss, and memory loss, in a sample of persons with SCI; (2) to examine the extent to which these symptoms are reported to have a tendency to improve or resolve, get worse, or stay the same over time; and (3) to estimate the associations among the symptoms and the associations between the severity of these symptoms and both community integration and psychologic functioning in a sample of persons with SCI.

Based on previous research, we developed a number of hypotheses regarding the analyses about which we are reporting. First, we anticipated that the frequency of pain would be around 80% in this sample, based on the findings from a previous study that used a similar sample.35 We were also interested in exploring the frequency of other symptoms reported by the sample. We did not make any hypotheses concerning their specific frequency, because the frequency of occurrence of these symptoms had not been reported by previous researchers. In addition, we predicted that most respondents would report that their pain either remained stable or got worse over time, given that pain in persons with SCI is relatively refractory.14 Again, however, because of the lack of previous research on the natural course of other symptoms, we did not make any hypotheses concerning the reported course of weakness, fatigue, numbness, memory loss, vision loss, or dyspnea. Finally, because each symptom plays an important role in patient functioning, we predicted that the severity of each symptom would show independent (ie, when controlling for the other symptoms) associations with patient functioning.

METHODS

Subject Characteristics

Participants for the current study completed a survey study that focused on pain in persons with SCI.14 As described in our previous report of this sample,14 questionnaires were mailed to 339 persons with SCI in waves from September 5, 2002, to June 25, 2004, and surveys were returned from September 12, 2002, to August 13, 2004. A primary source of subjects for this study was the University of Washington MSCIS database, and therefore most surveys (320 [78%]) were sent to persons in Washington State. Other sources of data subjects included persons who learned about the study via word of mouth from study participants or from contact with one of the study investigators in their clinical practices. Each questionnaire was accompanied by a consent form and a cover letter inviting the potential study participants to participate in the study. Subjects were paid $25 for completing and returning the consent forms and survey. The study procedures were approved by the University of Washington Human Subjects Review Committee.

Measures

The survey assessed demographic information (age, education level, employment status, race and ethnicity, marital status) and descriptive information about the SCI (time since SCI, SCI level). Survey respondents were also asked about the presence, severity (on 0 [none] to 10 [very severe] numeric scales), and course over the long and short terms (whether each symptom had become worse, become better, or stayed the same since its onset; whether it had become worse, become better, or stayed the same in the past 6 months) of 7 symptoms that they might be experiencing: pain, weakness, fatigue, numbness, memory loss, vision loss, and shortness of breath. These symptoms were selected based on (1) our clinical experience that at least some persons with SCI report experiencing these and (2) previous research that indicates that these are indeed reported by patients with SCI.

All participants were asked to complete a measure of community integration and psychologic functioning. The 13-item Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ)36 was used to assess community integration. The 3 integration domains of the CIQ include activities in the home (eg, meal preparation, housework), social activities (eg, leisure activities with others), and productive activity (eg, employment status). Evidence supports the reliability,37 discriminant validity,36 and construct validity36 of the CIQ scales.

We used the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental health scale38 to assess psychologic functioning. This measure has shown reliability and validity.38 The mental health scale is scored so that it has a possible range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health.

Analyses

The response rate to the survey and basic demographic and descriptive information about the respondents were examined first to describe the sample. Next, the frequency (rates of respondents who provided a response of “1” or more when rating the severity of each symptom) of each symptom and the average severity (both for all participants who rated the symptom on the 0–10 scale and also only among those who endorsed the symptom—ie, rated the severity as being at least “1”) were computed for each of the 7 symptoms for descriptive purposes. The frequencies of each course type (worse, the same, better) associated with each symptom since onset and during the past 6 months were also computed to determine the extent to which each symptom is perceived to change over time.

Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between the severity ratings of each symptom to determine the extent of overlap among these ratings. A very high level of overlap (eg, correlation coefficients of .50 or higher among the ratings) would suggest a possible factor that might be contributing to symptom reporting, such as depression or somatization, whereas lower coefficients would suggest that there are unique factors that contribute to the experience and reporting of each symptom. Correlations were also computed between the symptom severity ratings and the criterion measures (3 subscales of the CIQ, SF-36 mental health scale) to estimate the associations between symptom severity and patient functioning. The association between symptom severity and patient functioning was initially examined by computing correlation coefficients between each severity rating and the measures of each functioning domain. To control for the increased risk of type I error rates associated with multiple tests, a Bonferroni adjustment was used (.05/28 tests = .0018) for determining whether an association was statistically significant.

Finally, 4 regression analyses were performed with the 4 measures of functioning as the criterion variables and the 7 symptom severity ratings as predictors entered as a block (ie, at the same time) to determine the extent to which each of the symptoms contributes independently to the prediction of the 3 community integration domains and psychologic functioning. Age, sex, and duration of SCI were controlled for in these analyses, because symptoms are likely to increase in frequency with age in the general population; both age and sex have been found to be associated with both community integration and mental health in SCI samples,39,40 and the duration of SCI could be related to both the development of symptoms (eg, shoulder pain14) and the criterion variables.

RESULTS

Response Rate and Participant Characteristics

Of 339 surveys mailed, 27 were returned because the potential participant was no longer at the address on record, 2 were returned with information indicating that the subjects were deceased, 1 was returned with a note indicating that the patient was hospitalized and could not participate, and 2 potential participants wrote to say that they declined participation. Of the 309 possible surveys that might have been completed and returned (ie, excluding the 27 incorrect addresses, 2 deceased persons, and 1 unavailable person), we received 147 surveys with complete data (representing 48% of surveys that could have been returned and 43% of surveys mailed).

The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of the study subjects was 48.8±13.0 years (range, 21–88y). As previously reported,14 there was a wide degree of variability in the number of years since SCI (mean, 16.6±10.4y; range, 3.2–57.4y). The most frequent single cause of SCI was a motor vehicle collision (40.8%). Other causes included a fall (17.0%), a sports injury (7.5%), diving (7.5%), a gunshot wound (2.7%), or one of a variety of other causes (24.5%). The levels of injury reported by participants were C1-4 (15.6%), C5-8 (34.7%), T1-5 (10.2%), T6-12 (32.0%), and L1-S4/5 (7.5%). Thirty-nine percent of respondents reported that they had a complete injury, 50% reported that the injury was incomplete, and 11% reported that they did not know if their injury was complete or incomplete.

The majority (74.8%) of respondents were men, consistent with the higher frequency of males in the SCI population. Most (89.2%) of the survey respondents reported their ethnicity as white, with the remainder reporting their ethnicity as Native American (6.1%), Hispanic (3.4%), Asian or Pacific Islander (3.4%), or black (1.4%). The respondents reported having attended vocational or technical school (7.5%), having had some college (29.9%), being college graduates (27.9%), or having attended graduate school (19.0%). Relatively few (8.8%) had only a high school education or General Educational Development certificate, and only 6.8% reported that they did not graduate from high school.

Respondents to this survey were compared with nonrespondents on all demographic variables. The only significant difference to emerge was for education level; respondents to the current survey reported a higher frequency of having completed college or attended graduate school (46.9%) than persons who responded to the previous survey but not the current one (33.9%) ( equation M1 test=5.96, P<.05).

Frequency and Course of 7 Symptoms

The most common symptoms reported by the survey respondents were pain (84%), fatigue (67%), numbness (66%), and weakness (64%) (table 1). Shortness of breath (34%), vision loss (27%), and memory loss (27%) were reported less frequently. The most severe symptoms were pain (with 35% reporting pain levels of ≥7 on the 0–10 scale; sample mean severity rating, 4.71±3.14) and numbness (38% reporting numbness levels of ≥7 on the 0–10 scale; mean severity rating, 4.41±3.91). Weakness and fatigue were also reported as severe by a substantial subset of participants (both 18%; mean severity ratings, 3.21±3.08 and 3.23±2.89, respectively). Shortness of breath, memory loss, and vision loss were reported as less severe, on average.

Table 1
Frequency and Course of 7 Symptoms in the Sample of Patients With SCI

All 7 of the symptoms were more often reported as staying the same (range, 24%–60%) or getting worse (range, 21%–69%) rather than getting better (range, 3%–35%) since the onset of the symptom. During the past 6 months, symptoms tended most often to be perceived as staying about the same (range, 53%–82%). When change did occur during the past 6 months, the symptoms were more likely to get worse (range, 14%–39%) than to improve (range, 0%–13%). In short, according to the respondents’ recollections, little change seems to occur in symptom severity once symptoms begin, but when change does occur, symptoms are more likely to get worse than to get better.

Associations Among the Symptom Severity Ratings

Strong correlations were found between fatigue and weakness (r=.63), fatigue and shortness of breath (r=.52), and shortness of breath and weakness (r=.52). All but 3 of the other associations between the symptom ratings were in the moderate range (r range, .20–.49), with the exceptions of the associations between memory loss and imbalance (r=.13), memory loss and numbness (r=.13), and memory loss and shortness of breath (r=.16). Overall, there was relatively little overlap among the symptom ratings, with the strongest association only indicating about 40% of variance shared between ratings of fatigue and weakness.

Associations Between Symptom Severity and Patient Functioning

The zero-order correlation coefficients between the symptom severity ratings and the 4 criterion measures of functioning used in this study are presented in table 2. These analyses indicate that the symptoms reported by this sample were more closely linked to psychologic functioning and social integration than they were to home competency or productive activity. In addition, the symptoms that were most closely associated with these domains of functioning were pain, weakness, fatigue, and memory loss. All statistically significant correlations were negative, indicating that the greater the symptom intensity, the lower psychologic functioning and social integration. Numbness, vision loss, and shortness of breath were only weakly and nonsignificantly associated with the measures of functioning.

Table 2
Correlation Coefficients Between Patient-Rated Symptom Severity and Measures of Patient Functioning

Consistent with the correlation analyses reported earlier, the regression analyses indicated that symptom ratings did not contribute significantly to the prediction of the CIQ home competency scale or the CIQ productive activity. On the other hand, as a group, and controlling for age, sex, and SCI duration, the 7 symptoms were significantly associated with both the CIQ social integration and SF-36 mental health scales (table 3). As a group, the symptoms explained 23% of the variance of the CIQ social integration scale over and above statistically significant contributions of age, sex, and duration of SCI. Pain, weakness, memory loss, and vision loss all made independent and statistically significant contributions to the prediction of social integration in the multivariate analyses; fatigue showed a nonsignificant (P=.052) trend for making an independent contribution to the prediction of social integration.

Table 3
Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting CIQ Social Integration and SF-36 Mental Health Scale Scores From 7 Symptom Severity Ratings

The regression analysis predicting the SF-36 mental health scale indicated that the symptoms explained 25% of the variance in this criterion measure over and above the contributions of age, sex, and duration of SCI. In this analysis, pain and memory loss made independent and statistically significant contributions, whereas the contributions of fatigue (β=−.19, P<.10) and vision loss (β=.17, P<.10) did not reach statistical significance (see table 3). In summary, the regression analyses indicated that when controlling for age, sex, duration of SCI, and each of the other symptoms, pain and memory loss made significant and independent contributions to the prediction of both social integration and psychologic functioning. Furthermore, weakness and vision loss made significant and independent contributions to the prediction of social integration, and fatigue showed a nonsignificant trend toward making an independent contribution to the prediction of both social integration and psychologic functioning.

DISCUSSION

This study provides new information concerning the frequency and severity of a number of symptoms and their association with functioning in persons with SCI. As predicted—and consistent with previous research—pain was very common (84%) and was reported to be more likely to stay the same or to get worse than to resolve or improve both since the onset of the symptom and within the past 6 months. We also found that each of the other 6 symptoms assessed were endorsed by at least some of the respondents. Of these, the most common were weakness, fatigue, and numbness (endorsed by about two thirds of the sample); memory loss, vision loss, and dyspnea were endorsed by about one third of the sample. Like pain, once these other symptoms develop, they are reported to be more likely to stay the same or get worse than to resolve or get better. These findings have significant implications for the assessment and treatment of symptoms in persons with SCI.

Vision loss, in particular, is rarely reported as a direct consequence of SCI and yet, of the 27% of respondents who endorsed this symptom, 69% reported that it has become worse since onset, and 39% reported worsening vision over a relatively short time period, 6 months. The rate of vision difficulties in our sample is particularly notable given the low prevalence of vision problems reported in epidemiologic studies (usually <3%).4143 Further study is needed to determine the extent to which the high rate of perceived vision problems in our sample is the result of medical conditions associated with aging (eg, presbyopia, cataracts, glaucoma) or associated medical conditions (eg, diabetes mellitus) or if there are additional conditions found in SCI, such as autonomic dysreflexia or postural hypotension, that could potentially be impairing vision in this population.

The frequency, severity, and refractory nature of pain reported by participants in this study provide additional support for the growing body of research indicating that pain is a serious problem among many persons with SCI.7,14 These findings support the need to develop more effective treatments for pain in persons with SCI. On a positive note, a review of the literature suggests that researchers may be now responding to this need. For example, recent pilot studies have reported on the potential efficacy of a number of innovative treatments, including electric oscillating field stimulation,44 magnet therapy,45 cognitive behavioral therapy,46 transcranial electric stimulation,47 exercise,48 hypnotic analgesia,49 and a number of medications such as gabapentin,50,51 lamotrigine,52 and amitriptyline.53 Much of this preliminary work is promising, although none of these treatments appears to produce a marked decrease in pain in all study participants. Our findings support the importance of this work to develop effective treatments for SCI-related pain or at least examine ways of combining existing treatments that have moderate efficacy, on average, into regimens and treatment protocols that could have a significant clinical impact on pain and suffering.

Although not as frequent or severe as pain in this sample, fatigue was also very common, was significantly linked to measures of patient dysfunction, and was reported to be very refractory among those who reported it. This finding underscores the potential negative impact that fatigue may have on the lives of many persons with SCI. Although there are some studies15,54 that have noted fatigue as a problem in SCI populations, very little is known about the nature, course, or treatment of fatigue in persons with SCI. The current findings, when considered in light of the limited research on SCI-related fatigue, suggest that such research is urgently needed.

Other symptoms and complaints, such as weakness, numbness, memory loss, vision loss, and shortness of breath, have not been previously systematically studied in samples of persons with SCI. The current findings indicate that, of these other symptoms, weakness and numbness are the most common, but that weakness and memory loss are most closely linked to important functioning domains. Thus, although numbness may be relatively common, it may not be particularly problematic for most patients with SCI. On the other hand, although memory loss was endorsed only by a little more than a quarter of participants, it showed a strong association with both mental health and social integration. Readers should keep in mind, however, that prevalence rates of cognitive problems in the general population, particularly memory loss, show a large variability in epidemiologic studies (probably because of differences in samples and assessment procedures), ranging from a low of 3.2% to as much as 53.8%.5559 Thus, one cannot assume that the memory problems, or even the other symptoms, reported by participants in this sample are necessarily related to SCI.

Of course, patient-reported symptoms are not the only factors that contribute to decreased patient functioning. Previous research has identified a number of predictors of both psychologic functioning (eg, recent urinary infections,60 spasticity,61 bowel problems,61 receiving family care,60 catastrophizing,62 preinjury history of depression,63 marital status,61 employment status61) and community and social integration (eg, pain,64 neurologic classification and injury level,65 locus of control,64 family support66) in subjects with SCI. As a group, this research is consistent with biopsychosocial models of functioning in persons with SCI, which argue that biologic, psychologic, and social factors all can contribute to patient functioning. Patient care and functioning are likely maximized when clinicians assess and then treat as appropriate each of the biologic, psychologic, and social problems or issues that may be contributing to dysfunction in any one patient. Perhaps pain, weakness, fatigue, and memory loss might be considered an important (but not the exclusive) part of addressing the biologic portion of the whole person with SCI.

Study Limitations

There are a number of limitations of this study that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, we only measured 2 primary domains of functioning (community integration, psychologic functioning). Although the measure of community integration used in this study, the CIQ, has evidence of good reliability and validity,36,37 it has been criticized given that scoring favors respondents who (1) have able-bodied friends over those whose friends are not able-bodied, (2) spend more time with friends than family, and (3) tend to do household activities alone rather than with others.67 It is possible that some of the symptoms that did not evidence significant associations with the criterion variables used would show significant and strong relationships with other functioning or QOL domains or with other measures of community integration or psychologic functioning. Future research on the nature, scope, and impact of symptoms in persons with SCI should therefore assess additional functioning domains, such as physical functioning, social role functioning, and participation, and examine the association between these symptoms and community integration and psychologic functioning assessed with different measures.

A second limitation of the current study is that only some secondary complications—those focusing on perceived symptoms—were assessed and not other secondary complications common to persons with SCI such as spasms, bladder and bowel dysfunction, pressure ulcers, insomnia, and obesity, among others. Thus, we were not able to determine the relative contribution of the symptoms studied to patient functioning over and above any effects of these other complications. Also, we did not examine any of the signs associated with the secondary complications to help verify and quantify the extent of these problems. Future researchers should include measures of additional secondary complications to examine their relative frequency, severity, and potential role in patient functioning.

It is also possible that some study participants may have been confused about the consequences of SCI (eg, paralysis) and the symptoms we assessed (eg, weakness or numbness). To the extent that such confusion occurred, the associations between the symptoms and functioning, in particular, may be overestimated. Future researchers could potentially control for extent of paralysis in the analyses when measures of this are available. Similarly, the domains of pain and other symptoms are multidimensional; they consist not only of magnitude, which was assessed in this study, but can include spatial, quality, and temporal components. Simple 0-to-10 magnitude estimates do not provide a thorough evaluation of these symptoms. On the other hand, the fact that significant effects emerged for pain and some of the other symptoms at all, despite this limitation, supports the importance of these symptoms as they relate to patient functioning. Nevertheless, future research could examine how the location(s) of these symptoms, their quality, and their frequency might moderate the associations between symptom severity and QOL or even themselves show significant direct associations with measures of patient functioning.

Another limitation concerns the cross-sectional nature of the data, which makes it impossible to draw causal conclusions regarding the potential impact of symptoms on patient functioning. It is possible, for example, that higher levels of psychologic dysfunction may make patients more aware, or more ready to endorse, symptoms such as pain or memory loss.

A number of factors limit the potential generalizability of the findings. For example, the respondents came from 1 geographic region and received initial care at the same center. Also, as a group, the respondents reported a higher level of education than the nonrespondents. Finally, although the response rate of 48% (of possible surveys that could have been returned) to our survey is standard for this type of study, it still represents only a subgroup of the population. Additional research in other SCI samples is necessary to determine the generalizability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the study’s limitations, the current findings: (1) replicate previous research concerning the frequency and refractory nature of pain in persons with SCI; (2) indicate that other symptoms, such as weakness, fatigue, and numbness, are very common; and (3) indicate that a number of these symptoms, including pain but also weakness, fatigue, memory loss, and vision loss are associated with measures of social integration and psychologic functioning. Research is needed to replicate these findings in other samples of persons with SCI. A better understanding of the types of symptoms persons with SCI experience and their frequency, severity and impact on day-to-day functioning is an important step toward identifying effective treatments and improving the QOL of those living with SCI.

Acknowledgments

Supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health (grant no. P01 HD33988), National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, US Department of Education (grant no. H133N00003), and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, (grant no. 1 U01 AR52171-01).

We thank Amy Hoffman, MS, Emily Phelps, BS, Kristin McArthur, BS, Lindsay Washington, BA, Laura Nishimura, BS, Silvia Amtmann, BS, and Kevin Gertz, BA, for assistance with data collection and management. We also thank Masuo Koyasu, PhD, and the Division of Cognitive Psychology in Education, Graduate School of Education, Kyoto University, for providing the physical resources that made the completion of this study possible, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this study.

Footnotes

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

Contributor Information

Mark P. Jensen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Carrie M. Kuehn, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Dagmar Amtmann, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Diane D. Cardenas, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.

References

1. Caliri MH. Spinal cord injury and pressure ulcers. Nurs Clin North Am. 2005;40:337–47. [PubMed]
2. Liem NR, McColl MA, King W, Smith KM. Aging with a spinal cord injury: factors associated with the need for more help with activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1567–77. [PubMed]
3. Chen D, Nussbaum SB. The gastrointestinal system and bowel management following spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2000;11:45–56. [PubMed]
4. Jamil F. Towards a catheter free status in neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a review of bladder management options in spinal cord injury (SCI) Spinal Cord. 2001;39:355–61. [PubMed]
5. Garcia Leoni ME, Esclarin De Ruz A. Management of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9:780–5. [PubMed]
6. Buchholz AC, Bugaresti JM. A review of body mass index and waist circumference as markers of obesity and coronary heart disease risk in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:513–8. [PubMed]
7. Ehde DM, Jensen MP, Engel JM, Turner JA, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain secondary to disability: a review. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:3–17. [PubMed]
8. Anke AG, Stenehjem AE, Stanghelle JK. Pain and life quality within 2 years of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1995;33:555–9. [PubMed]
9. Budh CN, Hultling C, Lundeberg T. Quality of sleep in individuals with spinal cord injury: a comparison between patients with and without pain. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:85–95. [PubMed]
10. Rintala DH, Loubser PG, Castro J, Hart KA, Fuhrer MJ. Chronic pain in a community based sample of men with spinal cord injury: prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:604–14. [PubMed]
11. Rintala DH, Hart KA, Priebe MM. Predicting consistency of pain over a 10-year period in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:75–88. [PubMed]
12. Störmer S, Gerner HJ, Gruninger W, et al. Chronic pain/dysaesthesiae in spinal cord injury patients: results of a multicentre study. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:446–55. [PubMed]
13. Biering-Sørenson F, Biering-Sørenson M. Sleep disturbance in the spinal cord injured: an epidemiological questionnaire investigation, including a normal population. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:505–13. [PubMed]
14. Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: a survey and longitudinal study. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:704–12. [PubMed]
15. McColl MA, Arnold R, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Frankel H. Aging, spinal cord injury, and quality of life: structural relationships. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1137–44. [PubMed]
16. Gordon T. Fatigue in adapted systems. Overuse and underuse paradigms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;384:429–56. [PubMed]
17. Shields RK. Muscular, skeletal, and neural adaptations following spinal cord injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32:65–74. [PubMed]
18. Stein RB, Chong SL, James KB, et al. Electrical stimulation for therapy and mobility after spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res. 2002;137:27–34. [PubMed]
19. McComas AJ, Miller RG, Gandevia SC. Fatigue brought on by malfunction of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;384:495–512. [PubMed]
20. Gerhart KA, Charlifue SW, Menter RA, Weitzenkamp DA, Whiteneck G. Aging with spinal cord injury. Am Rehabil. 1997;23:19–25.
21. Grandas NF, Jain NB, Denckla JB, et al. Dyspnea during daily activities in chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1631–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Spungen AM, Grimm DR, Schilero G, et al. Relationship of respiratory symptoms with smoking status and pulmonary function in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002;25:23–7. [PubMed]
23. Ayas NT, Garshick E, Lieberman SL, Wien MF, Tun C, Brown R. Breathlessness in spinal cord injury depends on injury level. J Spinal Cord Med. 1999;22:97–101. [PubMed]
24. Spungen AM, Grimm DR, Lesser M, Bauman WA, Almenoff PL. Self-reported prevalence of pulmonary symptoms in subjects with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:652–7. [PubMed]
25. Go BK, De Vivo MJ, Richard JS. The epidemiology of spinal cord injury. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG, editors. Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the model systems. Gaithersburg: Aspen; 1995. pp. 21–51.
26. Kreutzer JS, Barth J, Ellwood MS, et al. Occult neuropsychological impairments in spinal cord injured patients [abstract] Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:764–5.
27. Davidoff G, Morris J, Roth E, Bleiberg J. Closed head injury in spinal cord injured patients: retrospective study of loss of consciousness and post-traumatic amnesia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:41–3. [PubMed]
28. Davidoff G, Thomas P, Johnson M, Berent S, Dijkers M, Doljanac R. Closed head injury in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: incidence and risk factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:869–72. [PubMed]
29. Sherman AL, Cardenas DD, Swedberg S. Management of traumatic optic neuropathy with coexistent spinal cord injury: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1012–4. [PubMed]
30. Vaccaro AR, Urban WC, Aiken RD. Delayed cortical blindness and recurrent quadriplegia after cervical trauma. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:535–9. [PubMed]
31. Jensen MP, Hanley MA, Turner JA, Cardenas DD. Pain and other sensations in persons with spinal cord injury: frequency and association with depression and pain interference. Psychologica. 2004;37:129–43.
32. Castro MJ, Apple DF, Jr, Staron RS, Campos GE, Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle within 6 mo of injury. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:350–8. [PubMed]
33. Thomas CK, Tucker ME, Bigland-Ritchie B. Voluntary muscle weakness and co-activation after chronic cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:149–61. [PubMed]
34. Capoor J, Stein AB. Aging with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16:129–61. [PubMed]
35. Turner JA, Cardenas DD, Warms CA, McClellan CB. Chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: a community survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:501–8. [PubMed]
36. Sander AM, Fuchs KL, High WM, Jr, Hall KM, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M. The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;8:1303–8. [PubMed]
37. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempl R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8(2):75–87.
38. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln: Quality Metric Inc; 2000.
39. Kaplan CP. The community integration questionnaire with new scoring guidelines: concurrent validity and need for appropriate norms. Brain Inj. 2001;15:725–31. [PubMed]
40. Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of Community Integration Questionnaire studies. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12(6):74–91.
41. Rothe NK, Sjoloe AK, Jensen H, Borch-Johnsen K, Rosenberg T. The prevalence and incidence of visual impairment in people of age 20–59 years in industrialized countries: a review. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2003;10:279–91. [PubMed]
42. Buch H, Vinding T, Cour M, Appleyard M, Jensen GB, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among 9980 Scandinavian adults: the Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:53–61. [PubMed]
43. Maberley DA, Hollands H, Chuo J, et al. The prevalence of low vision and blindness in Canada. Eye. 2006;20:341–6. [PubMed]
44. Shapiro S, Borgens R, Pascuzzi R, et al. Oscillating field stimulation for complete spinal cord injury in humans: a phase 1 trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:3–10. [PubMed]
45. Panagos A, Jensen M, Cardenas DD. Treatment of myofascial shoulder pain in the spinal cord injured population using static magnetic fields: a case series. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27:138–42. [PubMed]
46. Ehde DM, Jensen MP. Feasibility of a cognitive restructuring intervention for treatment of chronic pain in persons with disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49:254–8.
47. Capal ID, Dorrell HM, Spencer EP, Davis MW. The amelioration of the suffering associated with spinal cord injury with subperception transcranial electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:109–17. [PubMed]
48. Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:34–43. [PubMed]
49. Jensen MP, Hanley MA, Engel JM, et al. Hypnotic analgesia for chronic pain in persons with disabilities: a case series. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2005;53:198–228. [PubMed]
50. Ahn SH, Park HW, Lee BS, et al. Gabapentin effect on neuropathic pain compared among patients with spinal cord injury and different durations of symptoms. Spine. 2003;28:341–6. [PubMed]
51. Levendoglu F, Ogun CO, Ozerbil O, Ogun TC, Ugurlu H. Gabapentin is a first line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Spine. 2004;29:743–51. [PubMed]
52. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Bach FW, Johannesen IL, Jensen TS. Lamotrigine in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2002;96:375–83. [PubMed]
53. Cardenas DD, Warms CA, Turner JA, Marshall H, Brooke MM, Loeser JD. Efficacy of amitriptyline for relief of pain in spinal cord injury: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2002;96:365–73. [PubMed]
54. McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, Lawson N, Savic G. Aging, gender, and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:363–7. [PubMed]
55. Coria F, Gomez de Caso JA, Minguez L, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Claveria LE. Prevalence of age-associated memory impairment and dementia in a rural community. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:973–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Graham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, et al. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997;349:1793–6. [PubMed]
57. Koivisto K, Reinikainen KJ, Hanninen T, et al. Prevalence of age-associated memory impairment in a randomly selected population from eastern Finland. Neurology. 1995;45:741–7. [PubMed]
58. Lopez OL, Jagust WJ, DeKosky ST, et al. Prevalence and classification of mild cognitive impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: part 1. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1385–9. [PubMed]
59. Ritchie K, Artero S, Touchon J. Classification criteria for mild cognitive impairment: a population-based validation study. Neurology. 2001;56:37–42. [PubMed]
60. Haran MJ, Lee BB, King MT, Marial O, Stockler MR. Health status related with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2290–5. [PubMed]
61. Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1433–9. [PubMed]
62. Turner JA, Jensen MP, Warms CA, Cardenas DD. Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Pain. 2002;98:127–34. [PubMed]
63. Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, et al. Depression following traumatic spinal cord injury. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25:55–61. [PubMed]
64. Donnelly C, Eng JJ. Pain following spinal cord injury: the impact on community integration. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:278–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1485–91. [PubMed]
66. Song HY. Modeling social reintegration in persons with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:131–41. [PubMed]
67. McColl MA, Davies S, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The Community Integration Measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:429–34. [PubMed]